"But won't the industry run out of money over these DEI projects before the modern audience is made?" That's the gamble. Can gamers bankrupt the industry into having new gaming giants before BRIDGE creates the "modern audience" and turn us into a group of "old men yelling at clouds?"
Its like being afraid there wont be any Restaurants anymore because a Major Fast Food company is gone. But hey, who sweeps in and trys to buy Ubisoft Shares now that their Idiotic DEI crusade is catching up with them ? Tenchent. Its almost like there is a connection...
Considering that globalist investors pumping and buying out these bust gaming companies have virtually infinite cashflow because they own majority of the world's industries that all of humanity heavily rely on, the entire gaming industry is likely too big to fail over ESG-DEI failures.
USSR tried really hard to make a "new soviet man" and failed, so I'm pretty sure BRIDGE's efforts won't bear fruit either, but USSR lasted for ~70 years, so we better buckle up.
If there was any doubt about the lack of sense of reality within the minds of Seethe Baby and people associated with them... Well, for me... all doubts were set to ZERO from the start.
This guy would lose his mind if he knew that Mel Brooks is Jewish. He doesn’t understand blazing saddles as well calling it a western when it was a satirical take on the western.
That is most likely the point OP; for something to go wrong so everyone can use their pre-prepped "cops bad" arguments and stories. Literal sacrifices for the cause.
That is how they reproduce. They do so by turning people into Ideological Cookie Cut-outs. I'd like to say it is a Gestalt Consciousness buuuuuuut... It is pretty much explainable as : dozens of brains trying to operate cohesively in One Body. Like systemized Multiple Personality Disorder.
Even visually there is little diversity to them. Mentally though.....all have same programming and the moment any of them strays a little bit they are going to be destroyed by their own folk.
Because they ARE the same. They all think the same way, do the same things, preach the same rhetoric, not a thought in their head is their own: they are mouthpieces for ideology and nothing more. What they look like has almost nothing to do with it.
I was mentally prepared for the Sweet Baby Bullshite, but nothing could have steeled me for how grating it was going to be listening to this guy smacker his lips into the microphone every sixty seconds. Kirsche’s a trooper.
A lot of what's been happening makes more sense when the writers admit they write games and movies with the intention of picking a fight with the audience
Ye. They believe they are at war for the soul of the nation. A grade A moral panic, fueled by ideologues, sophists and well meaning "useful idiots" in culture and media.
One of the big giveaways of a scammer is they speak in relative and abstract terms. A legitimate endeavor can and will post hard numbers on demand. So when they say “we reject short term profits for long term gains,” these companies *should have* pushed back with “how long is short term?” Because then they’d learn that Sweet Baby and their ilk considers a decade to be short term and a generation long term, far different from the fiscal quarter and annual/biannual profits these companies think in. This stuff would be dead in the water if the game companies answering to their beck and call realized DEI/BRIDGE is Lord Farqhuad going “some of you will die but that’s a price I’m willing to pay.”
“The guy that’s been in the movie industry, making wildly successful and thought-provoking movies is wrong and you should hire me to do it right!” - the guy who has ONLY worked on the most disastrous, profit lost games of all time 🎩 🐍 no step on snek!🇭🇰🇺🇸
I can't even find this person's credit list anywhere. I don't even know what they have done. I have to assume, nothing, or at least nothing big enough to earn a credit? I just get a phd from Edmonton lol. This person is just posturing. It's all performative. Their only goal is to push a cultural agenda. They don't care about any of this stuff.
"These are the kind of stories that make ME feel real." 1. Why do you need a story in order to _feel_ real?! Why are you putting the responsibility of your existence on fiction!? 2. Why is it about you? If you are making a product for an audience to consume, the product can't be about you, it has to be about the audience. If you are selling entertainment to the audience, you need to make the audience entertained or you fail!
I genuinely don’t understand how they misunderstood Django: Unchained that bad. Especially when mentioning how Django treated other slaves, when he had only ever been gentle or sympathetic with slaves except for two instances: The first was when he was playing the character of a ruthless black slaver in order to infiltrate the plantation that held his wife, and the second was for Steven, Samuel L. Jackson’s character, who he hated because he was ACTUALLY the type of person who Django pretended to be in the first instance. These people are so disingenuous or divorced from reality that it’s actual insanity.
I wonder what his opinion is on Robert Downey Jr. Character Playing an Australian actor desguised as a black American Sergeant in Vietnam War. They will miss the parody of Pretentious Hollywood actors who have no personality and and Producers who only care about money and power and stick to "RDJ is super racist and appropriating black culture in the movie".
So, something important to remember about these huge firms is that most of the money they spend isn't actually theirs. A lot of it comes from long term invstment schemes, with pensions representing the largest singlesource. Hundreds of millions of people across the western world have collectively placed trillions into these firms in the hope that in 20, 30, 50 years the fund will pay them a retirement. In many cases people don't even pick where, they get whatever their employer has signed up for. The US regulator even removed the 80% funded target for active schemes because so many were falling short of asset-to-liability goals that it was threatening to create a trust problem in a system responsible for managing $35trillion
Yup! It's barely reported on by anyone with reach. I wish someone with a loud voice will call them on it. I have $$ in it too. But am also putting some in companies I want to support personally on the side. I'm fully aware and hopping this scheme crashes that would sadly lead to Most if not all the pensions in the west going bankrupt. Which we're close to right now. Thanks to most governments around the world pumping fake money into the world.
On one hand we have a movie legend. On other delusional they/them working for failing consultancy agency that need blackmail to recieve any work offer and even that wasn't enough to save them a client.
@@CloudyWolf713 It means you get to make up shit about a work and have your take be treated just as valid as what the creator of said work has to say about it and its themes. Think of it as the literary equivalent of seeing shapes in clouds.
@@Delashaw6667 I personally don't know if it's true, but hearing people describe it, that's how it sounds lmao, but the scenes I saw on YT from it look so goofy I have no idea if it's serious or not, considering that these days racism against a certain race "doesn't exist" I wouldn't be surprised if it is, but I never felt like watching it
@@noone12748 I'd suggest to watch a film review of it; to get a better understanding. OK, so the film is about a black guy dating a white chick and they go to meet the woman's family. It's a very stereotypical country side home that looks like the mansions of the 1800's. I'm gonna skip a lot and just say the family led him there to steal his body because the black body is better or something and does brain transplanting to do it. All of the producers film's about race specifically black.
One thought I had while watching: They make everything a spectrum to blur lines. That helps them undermine the position/beliefs/identify of others and assert their own.
@@DakkaBert in their psyche categorization itself is an act of discrimination because the moment one thing can be defined and separated from another it necessarily means the two things are not equal because they're not the same thing
@@PeterDanielBerg That is unless it's something they can separate and cram into the nebulous term "whiteness" with the express intent to discriminate in furtherance of some "greater good" such as reinstating segregation, forgoing non-discriminatory hiring practices, "Give me money because skin," and getting the first black guy on a game cover for the 50th time. The four greatest goods ever conceived, really.
I'm reminded of this quote of Anton Ego from Ratatouille: "In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face, is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is probably more meaningful than our criticism designating it so."
fuck no, that bit in ratatouille is easily the worst part of the movie by far, it's a completely one-sided view of the entire genre of criticism this part is just a massive self report from someone who does not put care and work in their critique. god this is bad
It’s just a generic kids movie lesson, like everyone is special or good deeds will be rewarded. Of course you shouldn’t just swallow these things wholesale and act as if reality reflects these things 100%, but I assume the sentiment of not treating your judgement as the most important thing that everyone should adhere to is genuinely just fine. Lots of people need to learn that these days.
@@dairoleon2682 what the hell are you talking about, being a critic is quality control in itself, you're meant to point out the good and the bad, explain why the bad is bad and why the good isn't bad, because you're invested into it and want to see more of the good and show to people how you can avoid the bad by explaining the whys and hows what even are you on about?!
@@jujuteuxOfficial I'm talking about how actual quality control personnel in hard fields (such as maintenance and engineering) are held to standards whereas mere critics are not. Just like with psychotherapy, there's no penalty for being bad at being an art critic, which is the entire point of the monologue at the end of Ratatouille and how you get dipshits like wine snobs who just make shit up and can't even be called out on it.
Same. The Last Jedi was the last time I thought something new would be good, without waiting to hear from a YTer who's seen it and whom I trust. I didn't even go to see Top Gun Maverick until I heard how good it was; because anymore, GOOD movies subvert my expectations.
In the movie "Little Nicky" (2000) his roommate is a failed actor and when Nicky needs to go back to hell they need to kill him to do this. The roommate ends up doing it while yelling something like "Damn you Patrick Swayze!! Stop stealing my roles!!" A delusional failed actor who somehow thinks that if just PS didn't exist HE would get all those roles. This dude gives off that EXACT energy. He thinks that if there was a QT sizd hole in the universe HE would be able to step right in there.
@@williansnobre Yeah, sadly, if the internet didn't exist in the first place, they wouldn't be able to pull something like this, but because of the nature of the internet, they also can't fully complete the demoralization process
The Sweer Babu individual's presentation was a trip.... person seems to reaalllly have an obsession with Quentin Tarantino. Nice work breaking down the Sweer Babu silliness, Foxu.
Okay. Let's see if I'm keeping accurate notes on how to do movie good™, according to Sweet Baby's best and brightest. - Django Unchained is tastelessly 'edgy' because Tarantino has no personal experiences to draw from, misunderstands character growth by neglecting that positive experiences can be impactful, and beats his characters down because his mentality is steeped in white supremacy and patriarchy. Despite the movie being set in one of the most well-documented and widely discussed eras in American history, despite the movie itself taking a gritty, unflattering lens to the practice of slavery and to slaveowners, and despite Tarantino catching flak from race grifters for making it. - If you're white, you can only tell 'edgy' stories if they're inherently self-effacing. - You cannot tell a good story if your team isn't diverse. It's just not possible. - You can want to destroy someone's creative work because you think the worst of their character but not hate them fundamentally. - White directors cannot make substantive movies about pivotal points in human history if they haven't experienced it firsthand. - The audience was apparently not meant to empathize with Django, despite Schultz being a static character and despite Django's perspective literally defining the movie. Also his dialogue was bad. - Django was never unleashed. The entire ending arc of the movie never happened. - Django isn't a western, satire or black comedy. It's a blacksploitation movie. He's also not a tortured hero because white characters exist, and because he didn't find/rally 'his people'. - The good genre understands that it earns its freedom bit was incomprehensible. I've got nothing. Even this guy can't keep up with the shit he's peddling. - Mel Brooks was actually a cultural visionary that made subversive statements as a commentary that holds true to this day. - Tarantino is white, and has not earned the right to make satirical material around the concept of slavery. Worse, his movie about slavery fails to be about slavery and is even dismissive of it wholesale because it doesn't portray it in the way Sweet Baby prefers. - Django is a weak and ineffectual character because the movie never, ever puts him on equal footing with white characters or its main villain. - Django hates his own people because he's a white supremacist icon. L o l. - White people cannot make movies about black people or involving the experiences of black people unless they 'set their ego aside', because they'll only ever produce material that's self-flattering or self-serving otherwise. - White people must use their inherent privilege to platform black people for superficial reasons. They can help, but they can't feel good about it. - White people have no perspective on history because other groups have claimed exclusive ownership over them. White people never helped fight slavery, nor were there people in the south that didn't regard slaves instrumentally/cruelly. - Blazing Saddles isn't subversive enough because Mel Brooks didn't use his white privilege to platform native americans, only black people. - Native Americans should apparently seek the help of a 'black nonbinary critic' to help them write from their own perspective, despite 90% of this video 'essay' establishing that people cannot go beyond their lane. - This guy is shocked that people don't like what he says, and is further appalled that there are people who just refuse to engage with him on any level. Most importantly: - Do not under any circumstances actually watch the movies you're intending to critique. ...That's enough distilled brain rot for me, today. At least there's justice in knowing that nothing he's touched will ever make as much money as Tarantino has from Django Unchained.
Deep Space 9 is one of my all-time favourite shows, and I'm pretty convinced Cameron never actually watched it lol. DS9 is a great example of how anyone can watch this series and really connect with it. For example, I don't need to be black or a father or a boy to relate to Ben and Jake's relationship and various stories and arcs in the show, and Season 4 Episode 2's The Visitor is so powerful, I challenge anybody of any identity not to cry during that episode. I dare you.
Kirsche continues to be the female foxu woman version of me...I was saying similar shit on Sunday when I was streaming Minecraft and someone was talkin about the Minecraft movie with me in chat. (Notably the "profit isn't the goal, it's brainwashing enough kids and idiots to thier ranks)
Fun fact, one of Tarantino's earliest inspirations were 'black-ploitations' films from the '70s that he use to watch in the theater as a child. This is why he made his lesser known 'Jackie Brown', because he has a deep reverence for that culture. So to allude that Tarantino could have ulterior motives shows the chip on this 'persons' shoulder.
"Telling stories that are subversive with authenticity" has got to be one of my favorite word salads. But of course, we do not speak the same language as them.
On the blacksploitation thing, Cameron clearly doesn't know what the term means, the same way he doesn't understand what the term "Genre" means. That's probably why you're confused, because what he's saying doesn't make any sense.
It's all false virtue & projection. Rocksteady is currently dampening & depositing in their diapers at the moment, as are SBI, because there's a push to bring back Batman as some sort of financial counterweight to offset Sushi Squad's abject failure.
@@Unapologeticweeb "Vulnerable Narcissism", like Jussie Smollett. They have all the self-centeredness of regular narcissists, but they want to be seen as martyrs. Really creepy, manipulative people. If you encounter one IRL, avoid him or her like the plague.
The hashtag is #aonobe : ashamed of nothing, offended by everything. The derived slur is 'nobe. Mainstream it, because it is a succinct descriptor of everything fucking wrong with Leftists.
@@Manganinja99 It would've broken containment at some point anyway. Think about how many of these people have gotten jobs in tech, media, and generally infesting most corporate HR structures.
@@tannerhamilton6025 Sad and true. If only they could've been quarantined to Tumblr, imagine what a better world we could have. However, instead of commercial space travel and colonies on Mars, the 21st century has people who don't know what a woman is, and who don't "feel real" unless works of fiction are centered around their exact and idiosyncratic, self-centered self. 😑
@@tannerhamilton6025 It was concentrated in there, but there already were plenty examples of it leaking into real word at the time. I wish I was a good archivist and had realized so much of the news articles and videos that were being shared at the time would end up getting much harder to find over time.
You know, it is funny. I recall some of the Rings of Power cast commenting during the season 1 promo stuff about how their show will be a generation's introduction to the LotR works. And that show takes a very liberal view of canon and lore, and every group of people is very cosmopolitan.
Me and my roommate had a whole conversation about this an hour ago, we're black men and we don't give a fuck about representation and diversity, it's been there our whole lives and it never mattered to us, we care about GOOD STORIES REGARDLESS OF WHO TELLS THEM AND WHAT ETHNICITY THEY ARE! WE DON'T CARE
"You only know you've made a mistake until after it's happened." The perfect way to describe Sweet baby inc being let into the industry. This person's trauma is that some pink haired Barista gave them too much WHITE whipped cream on their latte
The "modern audience" is the generation growing up on this, they take a short term loss for long term gain. And politicized remakes are their way of erasing the past. So true. Kirsche is brilliant at this.
> 1 year ago > 122 views > 1 comment > 6 likes Yeah, I think we're in for some hot takes. Like, dumpster fire hot. Got any marshmallows? Edit: Alright, so it's like half a day later. Comments are already turned off. Kinda sad I missed the flames.
"So called Montreal" Out of this entire diatribe, this sentence really stood out to me. Sweet Baby Inc wouldn't even exist if "So called Montreal" never existed.
oh my god The Shining is so good! it is the only horror movie I love watching because it's not jump scares, it's not loud noises, it's psychological horror! like you don't know sometimes what is real and what is in a character's head in the movie and I really love that and there's so many iconic scenes and quotes from it
That complaint about progressive games not making money under capitalism... that's the best "we need communism" argument I have seen in a while: "I need communism so I can make propaganda games for the state" - I doubt they will be allowed to make games about fat people with vitiligo and ugly women under communism either though. Have you seen Socialist Realist art? It's generally all very idealistic in how it portrays it's citizens. Also... fat people don't exist under communism.
Octavia Butler was not writing about the modern world. Likr Tolkien, there was no allegory. She wrote about what people would be forced to do to survive in a universe with much much more powerful and/or technologically advanced alien races/forces to contend with. Her main character was usually a black woman, mostly because she was a black woman, and thinking what she'd do in those situations was easier. She wasn't suffering from "death of the author" so much as "murder of the author" by the type of people who would work for Sweet Baby Inc.
Any potential losses like Ubisoft are merely part of the ongoing process of refining the messaging and strategy; investors being upset are just investors thinking that they now require a different approach. Those investment giga-firms obviously have a diversified portfolio with their hands in necessities like water and electricity, and of course there are other non-market-based ways to get your money without asking. How much capital do they have left in reserve to push societal change? Probably effectively infinite over the long run.
If it was a process, it's been 4 years, they still try to spread their " message", using the same ineffective "strategy". They haven't been refining anything
@@brendanboomhour7606 Hey, this kind of stuff doesn't get made in a week. Plus one of the strategies is saturation, even if it means a company is sacrificed. Is that not why old franchises are constantly being dug up to be modified? It's so that it is the only thing remaining for future generations. Whether it makes money or not is irrelevant.
@@brendanboomhour7606 [Huh, did YT eat my comment again?] Hey these things don't get made in a day. Part of the strategy is saturation too, remember? That's why old franchises are constantly being dug up to be modified, so that future generations will only see them and not the originals. Whether it makes money is completely irrelevant.
@@Xhaleon and yet, that's still failed, I think the only remakes I've even heard of that weren't pokemon, were Resident Evil, and those apparently didn't change that much story-wise. Every other remake that the wokies may have had a hand in where they have actual influence, I've seen nothing about, only really seen new IPs that immediately flopped, like Forspoken, and Concord, or that other one that was apparently taxpayer funded that I don't care enough about to try and remember the name of
This is why it's such a massive boon that indie games exist. If AAA companies aren't willing to create a good product and only focus on propaganda, indie developers will make good games to fill that void and get profit off it while the AAA companies suffer. Capitalism has issues, but this is one case of it being amazing.
The INSANE irony of them trying to lecture people about "not being uncomfortable that not every story is yours to own" while trying to insert themselves into every story.
That guy and his "de-arrest" thing, how the hell is that not glowing NEON GREEN levels of Fedposting? "Go on, break the law guys, it's risky but well worth the price." and he works for SBI.
who would have thought... warhammer 40k was wrong, the tyrannids and gene stealer are not in the 41st millenium but the 3rd... we need the emperor quick... Their hive mind is expanding, and like tyrannids, we might be surrounded.
He's a literary "ARMCHAIR QUARTERBACK" He's willing to CRITIQUE all these movies = all the directors works, all their messages, all their efforts . . . But he won't write the movies, Direct the cast . . . He won't choose the actors . . . The dialogue,story,allegory Etc . . ."becauseitwouldbeproblematic" because then, other's could CRITIQUE & Criticize HIS WORK ! ! ! = HE IS AN ARMCHAIR QUARTERBACK!!!
I feel like they guy didn't watch Blazing Saddles...he maybe watched one or two clips on Twitter. He definitely forgot the bit at the end where the movie makes fun of very effeminite gay men like himself.
dude thought Django was supposed to be a horror film. It wasn't, therefore his premise is wrong, and his conclusions are irrelevant. Media literacy for the win.
Note that "not under capitalism" part really means "not in a system where customers choose". No econ system where choice is an option would people buy this retrograde nonsense. So they want to force us to buy this stuff or pay for it through taxes or some other nonsense.
Every time he says "good genre" I get the feeling he's talking in Marxist newspeak where the way he's using it is different from how we would normally use it.
You’re not looking at this right. The point is not to create the audience, it’s to create the business. It’s years of tax incentives and favorable loans to replace people who don’t eagerly fall in line. The financial bias will kill companies that don’t fall in line because they simply have higher operating costs. And the ideologically compliant will be the ones training the next wave of employees.
Which, in turn, get crushed by the foreign competitors who are not saddled with boat anchors. So no, this _still_ won't work as described. You have to go further; you have to actively destroy competitors that you cannot subvert, and choke off access to competitors that you cannot destroy, and good luck doing that when both digital and physical mobility still exists.
But for all the wrong reasons. Mel Brooks was challenging the racial tensions while making a parody, it succeeded because it was both hilarious and cutting satire. This person could only focus on his white power fetish.
I would love to see this dude actually try to debate Tarantino about his films and ethics. $5 says that the dude shuts down within the first 5 minutes because he can’t actually back up anything he says.
No truly creative person would ever a) wish another creative person's work to be "critiqued out of existence"; b) want to deliberately offend others, regardless of whether those others are "the right people" or not (and who decides who the right people to offend are??); or c) want to burn the industry they work in to the ground. Truly creative people know in their hearts that if ONE creator succeeds, we ALL succeed. These people hate. They HATE, recklessly and completely. They are blinded and corrupted by that hate. And they will not stop on their own, any more than the Nazis would have stopped killing people who weren't Nazis, they need to BE stopped. Thanks for the video, liked and shared.
For the poor commenter from chat who asked why they make everything in a spectrum, I here you buddy. It took me about 300 pages to explain top to bottom. It's deep on epistemology and it's where their morals are sourced too.
I have actually watched Django unchained, I watched not too long ago, (I think 4 years ago) in what I think is the Danish version equivalent of college? I don't know, it's the school you go to after you reach 18 until you 21. anyway one day the class decided we were going to watch a movie and we looked up movies and we found a cowboy movie and that was Django unchained, I was really not interested because I don't watch many modern movies and if I wanted to watch a cowboy movie I would watch a Clint Eastwood movie. but I decide to watch from afar and oh my god in the first 10 minutes or 20 basically when he's in the dark Forest and first gets rescue I got immediately captivated this movie was not pulling punches and I love it for it. like this movie at some times felt like a documentary combined with an action cowboy movie and also some comedy. and I am not scared of saying this, this movie, Django unchained, is up there with "the good, the bad, and the Ugly" as some of the best cowboy movies ever! anyway to kind of talk about the guy we f****** watching, he has clearly not watch it or is not willing to talk about what happened, yeah the guy is captured and forced into slavery but before that he has a love interest and they are separated (I can't remember exactly how?) but I think it's because he is going to one plantation and she's going to the other or staying rather. anyway and he makes it his mission not to get revenge but simply saving her and maybe some of the other slaves (his main goal is honestly just her) but then after some stuff that happens they decide they are going to kill the big bad guy, the one in all the memes and they succeed but the Bounty Hunter dies and Django is captured again. but uses a trick he learned from the Bounty Hunter to get free and then go to the plantation and kills all of the slavers and saves the slaves and his beloved and the movie it ends around here if I remember correctly from my memory and it is a pretty summarized what I just said. but it's amazing when you watch it and there's such a good chemistry between the German doctor slash Bounty Hunter and Django and final thing I'm going to say about the movie all the way down here in the bottom, usually don't care too much about a black protagonist, most because I don't watch movies like that I watch cartoons and anime but I really rooted for Django and this might be the best black people focused movie I've ever seen! so it's funny he is not talking that positive about it
"But won't the industry run out of money over these DEI projects before the modern audience is made?"
That's the gamble.
Can gamers bankrupt the industry into having new gaming giants before BRIDGE creates the "modern audience" and turn us into a group of "old men yelling at clouds?"
Its like being afraid there wont be any Restaurants anymore because a Major Fast Food company is gone.
But hey, who sweeps in and trys to buy Ubisoft Shares now that their Idiotic DEI crusade is catching up with them ?
Tenchent.
Its almost like there is a connection...
Considering that globalist investors pumping and buying out these bust gaming companies have virtually infinite cashflow because they own majority of the world's industries that all of humanity heavily rely on, the entire gaming industry is likely too big to fail over ESG-DEI failures.
It's really easy.
Keep your money in your wallet
USSR tried really hard to make a "new soviet man" and failed, so I'm pretty sure BRIDGE's efforts won't bear fruit either, but USSR lasted for ~70 years, so we better buckle up.
@@an2qzavok it's not a question of if they'll last
It's a question of what they'll take down with them
Go get em crazy Fox lady.
Everyone has a skin color, because skin is not transparent.
Shes crazy... as a fox!
...
I'll see myself out.
Definitely not the same crazy as these weirdos haha
lol. so funny. shes so sexy and funny
@@MoparNewport i dont get it. how do you mean?
De-arrest\Unarrest. A.K.A. Interfering with an Arrest and Obstruction of Justice. Which can get you sent to jail.
dont worry, somebody will de-arrest u .....maybe.
wont be me tho...not that stupid.
If there was any doubt about the lack of sense of reality within the minds of Seethe Baby and people associated with them... Well, for me... all doubts were set to ZERO from the start.
It sounds like one of those stupid tiktok challenges. F around and find out.
Could also be charged with accessory after the fact.
It can also get you sent to your maker 😂
This advice is like daring a friend to touch a cops gun. Its only going to end badly
This is advice is from and for people who don't have to fear the cops because they're members of a protected class.
This advice would probably be ground zero for a wrongful death civil suit if someone actually takes this advice...
@@2142jerbo But would only be the author responsible or those who spread his ill advise via repost as well?
This guy would lose his mind if he knew that Mel Brooks is Jewish. He doesn’t understand blazing saddles as well calling it a western when it was a satirical take on the western.
That is most likely the point OP; for something to go wrong so everyone can use their pre-prepped "cops bad" arguments and stories. Literal sacrifices for the cause.
what suprises me is how can they all look so different yet all be exactly the same stereotype.
they are what they write all the same and unwell
That is how they reproduce. They do so by turning people into Ideological Cookie Cut-outs. I'd like to say it is a Gestalt Consciousness buuuuuuut... It is pretty much explainable as : dozens of brains trying to operate cohesively in One Body. Like systemized Multiple Personality Disorder.
Even visually there is little diversity to them. Mentally though.....all have same programming and the moment any of them strays a little bit they are going to be destroyed by their own folk.
Because they ARE the same. They all think the same way, do the same things, preach the same rhetoric, not a thought in their head is their own: they are mouthpieces for ideology and nothing more. What they look like has almost nothing to do with it.
The irony is that the more they try to look different from one another (let alone the rest of us) the more the look the same.
I was mentally prepared for the Sweet Baby Bullshite, but nothing could have steeled me for how grating it was going to be listening to this guy smacker his lips into the microphone every sixty seconds. Kirsche’s a trooper.
She really is! His gross lip-smacking was making me sick.
A lot of what's been happening makes more sense when the writers admit they write games and movies with the intention of picking a fight with the audience
Ye. They believe they are at war for the soul of the nation.
A grade A moral panic, fueled by ideologues, sophists and well meaning "useful idiots" in culture and media.
"...and make sure to grab for the officers weapon regularly."
One of the big giveaways of a scammer is they speak in relative and abstract terms. A legitimate endeavor can and will post hard numbers on demand. So when they say “we reject short term profits for long term gains,” these companies *should have* pushed back with “how long is short term?” Because then they’d learn that Sweet Baby and their ilk considers a decade to be short term and a generation long term, far different from the fiscal quarter and annual/biannual profits these companies think in.
This stuff would be dead in the water if the game companies answering to their beck and call realized DEI/BRIDGE is Lord Farqhuad going “some of you will die but that’s a price I’m willing to pay.”
“The guy that’s been in the movie industry, making wildly successful and thought-provoking movies is wrong and you should hire me to do it right!”
- the guy who has ONLY worked on the most disastrous, profit lost games of all time
🎩
🐍 no step on snek!🇭🇰🇺🇸
I can't even find this person's credit list anywhere. I don't even know what they have done. I have to assume, nothing, or at least nothing big enough to earn a credit? I just get a phd from Edmonton lol.
This person is just posturing. It's all performative. Their only goal is to push a cultural agenda. They don't care about any of this stuff.
the Tarantino tirade is actually wild
A portfolio speaks louder than the resume.
He's boiling over with envy of Tarantino's skill and success. All the SBI people are boiling balls of envy.
All that presentation managed to convince me of is that you can talk for a half-hour about several movies you haven't actually seen.
All while being unable to count. Dude has three pillars of "genre" and the second one is two different things.
Also, you can yap for hours and not say anything meaningful
"These are the kind of stories that make ME feel real."
1. Why do you need a story in order to _feel_ real?! Why are you putting the responsibility of your existence on fiction!?
2. Why is it about you? If you are making a product for an audience to consume, the product can't be about you, it has to be about the audience. If you are selling entertainment to the audience, you need to make the audience entertained or you fail!
Ikr, that's such a bizarre and creepy comment. . . like he doesn't feel real except through fiction. 🤯
I genuinely don’t understand how they misunderstood Django: Unchained that bad. Especially when mentioning how Django treated other slaves, when he had only ever been gentle or sympathetic with slaves except for two instances: The first was when he was playing the character of a ruthless black slaver in order to infiltrate the plantation that held his wife, and the second was for Steven, Samuel L. Jackson’s character, who he hated because he was ACTUALLY the type of person who Django pretended to be in the first instance. These people are so disingenuous or divorced from reality that it’s actual insanity.
They are mad that one of the best characters is a white guy, and one of the most evil is a black dude so they seethe that is not anti-white enough.
I wonder what his opinion is on Robert Downey Jr. Character Playing an Australian actor desguised as a black American Sergeant in Vietnam War. They will miss the parody of Pretentious Hollywood actors who have no personality and and Producers who only care about money and power and stick to "RDJ is super racist and appropriating black culture in the movie".
The media illiteracy crowd is media illiterate? How ironic.
They don't understand storytelling, whether it be from a writing or in-iniverse standpoint
So, something important to remember about these huge firms is that most of the money they spend isn't actually theirs. A lot of it comes from long term invstment schemes, with pensions representing the largest singlesource. Hundreds of millions of people across the western world have collectively placed trillions into these firms in the hope that in 20, 30, 50 years the fund will pay them a retirement. In many cases people don't even pick where, they get whatever their employer has signed up for. The US regulator even removed the 80% funded target for active schemes because so many were falling short of asset-to-liability goals that it was threatening to create a trust problem in a system responsible for managing $35trillion
Yup! It's barely reported on by anyone with reach. I wish someone with a loud voice will call them on it. I have $$ in it too. But am also putting some in companies I want to support personally on the side. I'm fully aware and hopping this scheme crashes that would sadly lead to Most if not all the pensions in the west going bankrupt. Which we're close to right now. Thanks to most governments around the world pumping fake money into the world.
"He hasn't earned the right to laugh."
Bold to assume he's the one that gets to decide that
On one hand we have a movie legend. On other delusional they/them working for failing consultancy agency that need blackmail to recieve any work offer and even that wasn't enough to save them a client.
"We are not meant to identify with Django, we are supposed to watch him".
Yes, that's how stories work.
"The Death of The Author" and its consequences have been a disaster for reading comprehension.
"The Author is dead, long live the Party's Critic."
It's not the original work's fault, it's the interpretation that the author is somehow responsible for people's insane interpretations.
They all learned from armchair philosopher teachers who could never believe that sometimes a red door is just a red door
I’m still not entirely sure what that phrase means.
@@CloudyWolf713 It means you get to make up shit about a work and have your take be treated just as valid as what the creator of said work has to say about it and its themes. Think of it as the literary equivalent of seeing shapes in clouds.
Foxu on a roll! I admire your strong work ethic!
Sees terrified black guy from get out:
"Yeah that's literally me, frfr"
Isn't that movie racist or something?
@@noone12748 are you talking about the film, or the writer/producer?
@@Delashaw6667 I personally don't know if it's true, but hearing people describe it, that's how it sounds lmao, but the scenes I saw on YT from it look so goofy I have no idea if it's serious or not, considering that these days racism against a certain race "doesn't exist" I wouldn't be surprised if it is, but I never felt like watching it
@@noone12748 I'd suggest to watch a film review of it; to get a better understanding.
OK, so the film is about a black guy dating a white chick and they go to meet the woman's family.
It's a very stereotypical country side home that looks like the mansions of the 1800's.
I'm gonna skip a lot and just say the family led him there to steal his body because the black body is better or something and does brain transplanting to do it.
All of the producers film's about race specifically black.
@@Delashaw6667 Yeah see, it sounds really sus to me lmao, but I might check a review of it
Remember when GamerGate was about Zoey Quinn offering "intimate compensation" to male journalists willing to give her game a good review?
One thought I had while watching: They make everything a spectrum to blur lines. That helps them undermine the position/beliefs/identify of others and assert their own.
true, erasing definitions makes it harder to define exactly what they're doing
@@DakkaBert in their psyche categorization itself is an act of discrimination because the moment one thing can be defined and separated from another it necessarily means the two things are not equal because they're not the same thing
@@PeterDanielBerg That is unless it's something they can separate and cram into the nebulous term "whiteness" with the express intent to discriminate in furtherance of some "greater good" such as reinstating segregation, forgoing non-discriminatory hiring practices, "Give me money because skin," and getting the first black guy on a game cover for the 50th time.
The four greatest goods ever conceived, really.
I'm reminded of this quote of Anton Ego from Ratatouille: "In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face, is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is probably more meaningful than our criticism designating it so."
fuck no, that bit in ratatouille is easily the worst part of the movie by far, it's a completely one-sided view of the entire genre of criticism
this part is just a massive self report from someone who does not put care and work in their critique.
god this is bad
It’s just a generic kids movie lesson, like everyone is special or good deeds will be rewarded. Of course you shouldn’t just swallow these things wholesale and act as if reality reflects these things 100%, but I assume the sentiment of not treating your judgement as the most important thing that everyone should adhere to is genuinely just fine. Lots of people need to learn that these days.
@@jujuteuxOfficial Way to announce that you don't understand the difference between criticism and quality control.
@@dairoleon2682 what the hell are you talking about, being a critic is quality control in itself, you're meant to point out the good and the bad, explain why the bad is bad and why the good isn't bad, because you're invested into it and want to see more of the good and show to people how you can avoid the bad by explaining the whys and hows
what even are you on about?!
@@jujuteuxOfficial I'm talking about how actual quality control personnel in hard fields (such as maintenance and engineering) are held to standards whereas mere critics are not. Just like with psychotherapy, there's no penalty for being bad at being an art critic, which is the entire point of the monologue at the end of Ratatouille and how you get dipshits like wine snobs who just make shit up and can't even be called out on it.
"How to get shot, any% speedrun" - the manual.
When you fail out of film school twice and make a power point presentation that shows exactly why. Thanks, I hate it.
Recent media has failed to subvert my expectations. I no longer expect it to be good.
Same. The Last Jedi was the last time I thought something new would be good, without waiting to hear from a YTer who's seen it and whom I trust. I didn't even go to see Top Gun Maverick until I heard how good it was; because anymore, GOOD movies subvert my expectations.
In the movie "Little Nicky" (2000) his roommate is a failed actor and when Nicky needs to go back to hell they need to kill him to do this. The roommate ends up doing it while yelling something like "Damn you Patrick Swayze!! Stop stealing my roles!!"
A delusional failed actor who somehow thinks that if just PS didn't exist HE would get all those roles.
This dude gives off that EXACT energy.
He thinks that if there was a QT sizd hole in the universe HE would be able to step right in there.
We don't hate SBI, we only want it critiqued out of existence.
we dont hate SBI enough
This fox is doing more journalism than all most major website combined.
Kirsche's rant about The Ring was glorious.
Honestly I feel the same way about the original original Godzilla.
Good story tellings universal.
Aside from physical slavery, there is something called mental slavery.
Where you are brow beaten into believing an ideology.
The internet is an obstacle to that
@@noone12748on the wrong hands it is a tool for it instead of an obstacle
@@williansnobre Yeah, sadly, if the internet didn't exist in the first place, they wouldn't be able to pull something like this, but because of the nature of the internet, they also can't fully complete the demoralization process
@@noone12748it's also a tool for that look at the amount of people who swallow without thinking anything online news sites like the Guardian says
@@noone12748 The classic two-sided sword.
The Sweer Babu individual's presentation was a trip.... person seems to reaalllly have an obsession with Quentin Tarantino. Nice work breaking down the Sweer Babu silliness, Foxu.
Okay. Let's see if I'm keeping accurate notes on how to do movie good™, according to Sweet Baby's best and brightest.
- Django Unchained is tastelessly 'edgy' because Tarantino has no personal experiences to draw from, misunderstands character growth by neglecting that positive experiences can be impactful, and beats his characters down because his mentality is steeped in white supremacy and patriarchy. Despite the movie being set in one of the most well-documented and widely discussed eras in American history, despite the movie itself taking a gritty, unflattering lens to the practice of slavery and to slaveowners, and despite Tarantino catching flak from race grifters for making it.
- If you're white, you can only tell 'edgy' stories if they're inherently self-effacing.
- You cannot tell a good story if your team isn't diverse. It's just not possible.
- You can want to destroy someone's creative work because you think the worst of their character but not hate them fundamentally.
- White directors cannot make substantive movies about pivotal points in human history if they haven't experienced it firsthand.
- The audience was apparently not meant to empathize with Django, despite Schultz being a static character and despite Django's perspective literally defining the movie. Also his dialogue was bad.
- Django was never unleashed. The entire ending arc of the movie never happened.
- Django isn't a western, satire or black comedy. It's a blacksploitation movie. He's also not a tortured hero because white characters exist, and because he didn't find/rally 'his people'.
- The good genre understands that it earns its freedom bit was incomprehensible. I've got nothing. Even this guy can't keep up with the shit he's peddling.
- Mel Brooks was actually a cultural visionary that made subversive statements as a commentary that holds true to this day.
- Tarantino is white, and has not earned the right to make satirical material around the concept of slavery. Worse, his movie about slavery fails to be about slavery and is even dismissive of it wholesale because it doesn't portray it in the way Sweet Baby prefers.
- Django is a weak and ineffectual character because the movie never, ever puts him on equal footing with white characters or its main villain.
- Django hates his own people because he's a white supremacist icon. L o l.
- White people cannot make movies about black people or involving the experiences of black people unless they 'set their ego aside', because they'll only ever produce material that's self-flattering or self-serving otherwise.
- White people must use their inherent privilege to platform black people for superficial reasons. They can help, but they can't feel good about it.
- White people have no perspective on history because other groups have claimed exclusive ownership over them. White people never helped fight slavery, nor were there people in the south that didn't regard slaves instrumentally/cruelly.
- Blazing Saddles isn't subversive enough because Mel Brooks didn't use his white privilege to platform native americans, only black people.
- Native Americans should apparently seek the help of a 'black nonbinary critic' to help them write from their own perspective, despite 90% of this video 'essay' establishing that people cannot go beyond their lane.
- This guy is shocked that people don't like what he says, and is further appalled that there are people who just refuse to engage with him on any level.
Most importantly:
- Do not under any circumstances actually watch the movies you're intending to critique.
...That's enough distilled brain rot for me, today. At least there's justice in knowing that nothing he's touched will ever make as much money as Tarantino has from Django Unchained.
"tarantino thrives off of people not liking him" what the actual? Maybe outside of 2 movies I see lots of praise for tarantino.
And most of his fans (at least where I live) are rabid and you better not cross them.
Attempting a "de-arrest" sounds like a stupid way to get shot.
I have another word for “de-arrest”: accessory after the fact.
I prefer "co-conspirator".
Deep Space 9 is one of my all-time favourite shows, and I'm pretty convinced Cameron never actually watched it lol. DS9 is a great example of how anyone can watch this series and really connect with it. For example, I don't need to be black or a father or a boy to relate to Ben and Jake's relationship and various stories and arcs in the show, and Season 4 Episode 2's The Visitor is so powerful, I challenge anybody of any identity not to cry during that episode. I dare you.
"But won't the industry run out of money over these DEI projects before the modern audience is made?"
Hope springs eternal
This creature does not know what makes a movie. Keep being based Fox
I think he likes to eat bannanas for the shape.
That antifa document is reaching delulu levels not even I can manage.
Kirsche continues to be the female foxu woman version of me...I was saying similar shit on Sunday when I was streaming Minecraft and someone was talkin about the Minecraft movie with me in chat. (Notably the "profit isn't the goal, it's brainwashing enough kids and idiots to thier ranks)
Ceiling bird chirps at 22:20. This is so far beyond parody.
Oh sweet Jesus 😂
This guy would lose his mind if he knew Mel Brooks at all.
Yup, Mel is not as un-pc as Lloyd Kaufman (you know, the Troma-boss) but close enough.
Fun fact, one of Tarantino's earliest inspirations were 'black-ploitations' films from the '70s that he use to watch in the theater as a child. This is why he made his lesser known 'Jackie Brown', because he has a deep reverence for that culture. So to allude that Tarantino could have ulterior motives shows the chip on this 'persons' shoulder.
"Telling stories that are subversive with authenticity" has got to be one of my favorite word salads. But of course, we do not speak the same language as them.
"Subversive with authenticity"? So... being fake as hell?
On the blacksploitation thing, Cameron clearly doesn't know what the term means, the same way he doesn't understand what the term "Genre" means. That's probably why you're confused, because what he's saying doesn't make any sense.
This guy sounds exactly like every gay stereotype ever
Reminds me of the "this is a homosexual man, and this is a (bundle of sticks)"
because these people only see demographics, they dont have real personalities aside from their demographic
You *_CAN'T_* sympathize, that's *_WHY_* everything you write *_HAS_* to be self-inserts, because if it's not you, you can't enjoy it
It's all false virtue & projection. Rocksteady is currently dampening & depositing in their diapers at the moment, as are SBI, because there's a push to bring back Batman as some sort of financial counterweight to offset Sushi Squad's abject failure.
Easily one of the most true things about the movement, so many have shown minimal ability to feel empathy without narcissism
I wonder if there is a certain personality flaw that has all of these traits like say narcissism
Maslov's hierarchy pegs guys like this as level three or four, tops.
@@Unapologeticweeb "Vulnerable Narcissism", like Jussie Smollett. They have all the self-centeredness of regular narcissists, but they want to be seen as martyrs. Really creepy, manipulative people. If you encounter one IRL, avoid him or her like the plague.
1:26:09 "the waco kid" is gene wilder's character in Blazing Saddles.
Forever victims
The hashtag is #aonobe : ashamed of nothing, offended by everything. The derived slur is 'nobe. Mainstream it, because it is a succinct descriptor of everything fucking wrong with Leftists.
*Tumblr and it's consequences have been a disaster for Mankind.*
If only they didn't ban the NSFW content on there maybe just maybe things would be different. The great migration to Twitter was the worse thing ever.
@@Manganinja99 It would've broken containment at some point anyway. Think about how many of these people have gotten jobs in tech, media, and generally infesting most corporate HR structures.
@@tannerhamilton6025 Sad and true. If only they could've been quarantined to Tumblr, imagine what a better world we could have. However, instead of commercial space travel and colonies on Mars, the 21st century has people who don't know what a woman is, and who don't "feel real" unless works of fiction are centered around their exact and idiosyncratic, self-centered self. 😑
@@tannerhamilton6025 It was concentrated in there, but there already were plenty examples of it leaking into real word at the time. I wish I was a good archivist and had realized so much of the news articles and videos that were being shared at the time would end up getting much harder to find over time.
Eh. Sweet Baby already got away with literal murder. It is built on the corpse of Alec Holowka after Zoe Quinn second hand killed him.
Remember, the main character in Get Out saves himself by picking cotton.
What did Peele mean by this?
Dude doesn’t even know that Tarantino’s Django is a remake of an Italian spaghetti western. What a dork.
It's not a remake (despite the Franco Nero-cameo), it's loosely based on ideas from the original.
@@stevekramerf242 a lot of Tarantino’s films rip ideas from other flicks.
@@dondonpachi1205 Yeah, I know and he never denied that, since he is a big fan of cult films.
You know, it is funny. I recall some of the Rings of Power cast commenting during the season 1 promo stuff about how their show will be a generation's introduction to the LotR works. And that show takes a very liberal view of canon and lore, and every group of people is very cosmopolitan.
Me and my roommate had a whole conversation about this an hour ago, we're black men and we don't give a fuck about representation and diversity, it's been there our whole lives and it never mattered to us, we care about GOOD STORIES REGARDLESS OF WHO TELLS THEM AND WHAT ETHNICITY THEY ARE! WE DON'T CARE
"You only know you've made a mistake until after it's happened." The perfect way to describe Sweet baby inc being let into the industry.
This person's trauma is that some pink haired Barista gave them too much WHITE whipped cream on their latte
I feel like this dude just wrote his own version of Mein Kampf... telling us all his struggles with the "white problem"
The "modern audience" is the generation growing up on this, they take a short term loss for long term gain. And politicized remakes are their way of erasing the past. So true. Kirsche is brilliant at this.
The moment I saw the cow ring I knew he was a fruit.
> 1 year ago
> 122 views
> 1 comment
> 6 likes
Yeah, I think we're in for some hot takes. Like, dumpster fire hot. Got any marshmallows?
Edit: Alright, so it's like half a day later. Comments are already turned off. Kinda sad I missed the flames.
8세기 북유럽을 무대로 바이킹의 이야기를 다루는데 흑인이 등장하지 않았다는 이유로 비난하는 것이 sweet baby가 하는 일이다
Mental illness is a spectrum
Gender is a spectrum
Genre is a spectrum
Is there anything that's not a spectrum?
"hwuiteness"
Even Spectrum the internet company is on the spectrum. Nothing is safe from the trum.
spectrum
50 shades of grey. lol
Criminality ig
"So called Montreal"
Out of this entire diatribe, this sentence really stood out to me. Sweet Baby Inc wouldn't even exist if "So called Montreal" never existed.
its a safe bet that he was "touched" as a child. that's his trauma
I mean that's pretty obvious since he has they/them pronouns
oh my god The Shining is so good! it is the only horror movie I love watching because it's not jump scares, it's not loud noises, it's psychological horror!
like you don't know sometimes what is real and what is in a character's head in the movie and I really love that and there's so many iconic scenes and quotes from it
That complaint about progressive games not making money under capitalism... that's the best "we need communism" argument I have seen in a while:
"I need communism so I can make propaganda games for the state" - I doubt they will be allowed to make games about fat people with vitiligo and ugly women under communism either though. Have you seen Socialist Realist art? It's generally all very idealistic in how it portrays it's citizens. Also... fat people don't exist under communism.
Yeah, but REAL communism was never tried before. :D
Octavia Butler was not writing about the modern world. Likr Tolkien, there was no allegory.
She wrote about what people would be forced to do to survive in a universe with much much more powerful and/or technologically advanced alien races/forces to contend with. Her main character was usually a black woman, mostly because she was a black woman, and thinking what she'd do in those situations was easier.
She wasn't suffering from "death of the author" so much as "murder of the author" by the type of people who would work for Sweet Baby Inc.
This Guy needs some steak, and a whiskey... Good Gods, how do these people exist...
My Brain Hurts just from listening to whatever they are.
There's nobody more racist than the people who see racism in everything.
This Cameron Wild guy sounds like he literally worked on every single sweet baby woke travesty
Any potential losses like Ubisoft are merely part of the ongoing process of refining the messaging and strategy; investors being upset are just investors thinking that they now require a different approach. Those investment giga-firms obviously have a diversified portfolio with their hands in necessities like water and electricity, and of course there are other non-market-based ways to get your money without asking. How much capital do they have left in reserve to push societal change? Probably effectively infinite over the long run.
If it was a process, it's been 4 years, they still try to spread their " message", using the same ineffective "strategy". They haven't been refining anything
@@brendanboomhour7606 Hey, this kind of stuff doesn't get made in a week. Plus one of the strategies is saturation, even if it means a company is sacrificed. Is that not why old franchises are constantly being dug up to be modified? It's so that it is the only thing remaining for future generations. Whether it makes money or not is irrelevant.
@@brendanboomhour7606 [Huh, did YT eat my comment again?] Hey these things don't get made in a day. Part of the strategy is saturation too, remember? That's why old franchises are constantly being dug up to be modified, so that future generations will only see them and not the originals. Whether it makes money is completely irrelevant.
@@Xhaleon and yet, that's still failed, I think the only remakes I've even heard of that weren't pokemon, were Resident Evil, and those apparently didn't change that much story-wise. Every other remake that the wokies may have had a hand in where they have actual influence, I've seen nothing about, only really seen new IPs that immediately flopped, like Forspoken, and Concord, or that other one that was apparently taxpayer funded that I don't care enough about to try and remember the name of
Effectively infinite since the same people behind them are the same people behind the Federal Reserve and IMF.
That constant lip smacking starting around 17:00 was killing me.
I've never seen such a delusional fanfiction for several films this dude clearly didnt watch
The fact that these people with no sense of reality or survival are able to make living out of these kinds of "Work" is fucking mind blowing.
He is in it's simplist of terms
Advocating Genocide
This is why it's such a massive boon that indie games exist. If AAA companies aren't willing to create a good product and only focus on propaganda, indie developers will make good games to fill that void and get profit off it while the AAA companies suffer.
Capitalism has issues, but this is one case of it being amazing.
The INSANE irony of them trying to lecture people about "not being uncomfortable that not every story is yours to own" while trying to insert themselves into every story.
That guy and his "de-arrest" thing, how the hell is that not glowing NEON GREEN levels of Fedposting? "Go on, break the law guys, it's risky but well worth the price." and he works for SBI.
This man clearly lives a miserable life
who would have thought... warhammer 40k was wrong, the tyrannids and gene stealer are not in the 41st millenium but the 3rd... we need the emperor quick... Their hive mind is expanding, and like tyrannids, we might be surrounded.
He never looks at the camera, except for quick glances
He's a literary "ARMCHAIR QUARTERBACK" He's willing to CRITIQUE all these movies = all the directors works, all their messages, all their efforts . . .
But he won't write the movies,
Direct the cast . . . He won't choose the actors . . .
The dialogue,story,allegory
Etc . . ."becauseitwouldbeproblematic" because then, other's could CRITIQUE & Criticize HIS WORK ! ! ! = HE IS AN ARMCHAIR QUARTERBACK!!!
I'll make a character however the fuck I want to make them.
They literally can't run out of money is the thing.
I feel like they guy didn't watch Blazing Saddles...he maybe watched one or two clips on Twitter. He definitely forgot the bit at the end where the movie makes fun of very effeminite gay men like himself.
Lil bro with the nose ring wants to walk about what makes "good fiction" when he works for Sweet Baby LMAO
dude thought Django was supposed to be a horror film. It wasn't, therefore his premise is wrong, and his conclusions are irrelevant. Media literacy for the win.
To be fair, the original Django from 1966 has some horror-influences. But I doubt this "guy" even knows that movie.
Note that "not under capitalism" part really means "not in a system where customers choose". No econ system where choice is an option would people buy this retrograde nonsense. So they want to force us to buy this stuff or pay for it through taxes or some other nonsense.
"You WILL Consume our Products."
"You WILL NOT criticize them"
"You WILL Pay for Them"
"You WILL enjoy them"
Every time he says "good genre" I get the feeling he's talking in Marxist newspeak where the way he's using it is different from how we would normally use it.
You’re not looking at this right.
The point is not to create the audience, it’s to create the business.
It’s years of tax incentives and favorable loans to replace people who don’t eagerly fall in line.
The financial bias will kill companies that don’t fall in line because they simply have higher operating costs.
And the ideologically compliant will be the ones training the next wave of employees.
Which, in turn, get crushed by the foreign competitors who are not saddled with boat anchors.
So no, this _still_ won't work as described. You have to go further; you have to actively destroy competitors that you cannot subvert, and choke off access to competitors that you cannot destroy, and good luck doing that when both digital and physical mobility still exists.
Only thing he (she/they/it?) got right is that Blazing Saddles is a great film. "He said the sheriff is near!"
But for all the wrong reasons. Mel Brooks was challenging the racial tensions while making a parody, it succeeded because it was both hilarious and cutting satire. This person could only focus on his white power fetish.
I would love to see this dude actually try to debate Tarantino about his films and ethics. $5 says that the dude shuts down within the first 5 minutes because he can’t actually back up anything he says.
No truly creative person would ever a) wish another creative person's work to be "critiqued out of existence"; b) want to deliberately offend others, regardless of whether those others are "the right people" or not (and who decides who the right people to offend are??); or c) want to burn the industry they work in to the ground. Truly creative people know in their hearts that if ONE creator succeeds, we ALL succeed. These people hate. They HATE, recklessly and completely. They are blinded and corrupted by that hate. And they will not stop on their own, any more than the Nazis would have stopped killing people who weren't Nazis, they need to BE stopped. Thanks for the video, liked and shared.
His new biography : "COWARDS REVENGE"
I cannot stress enough how psychotic this "Dearresting" concept is. It's NOT that hard to be a NORMAL person and follow the damn law, for God's sake!
Not only is this very informative but Kirsche is also giving great movie recommendations
For the poor commenter from chat who asked why they make everything in a spectrum, I here you buddy. It took me about 300 pages to explain top to bottom. It's deep on epistemology and it's where their morals are sourced too.
I have actually watched Django unchained, I watched not too long ago, (I think 4 years ago) in what I think is the Danish version equivalent of college? I don't know, it's the school you go to after you reach 18 until you 21.
anyway one day the class decided we were going to watch a movie and we looked up movies and we found a cowboy movie and that was Django unchained, I was really not interested because I don't watch many modern movies and if I wanted to watch a cowboy movie I would watch a Clint Eastwood movie.
but I decide to watch from afar and oh my god in the first 10 minutes or 20 basically when he's in the dark Forest and first gets rescue I got immediately captivated this movie was not pulling punches and I love it for it.
like this movie at some times felt like a documentary combined with an action cowboy movie and also some comedy.
and I am not scared of saying this, this movie, Django unchained, is up there with "the good, the bad, and the Ugly" as some of the best cowboy movies ever!
anyway to kind of talk about the guy we f****** watching, he has clearly not watch it or is not willing to talk about what happened, yeah the guy is captured and forced into slavery but before that he has a love interest and they are separated (I can't remember exactly how?) but I think it's because he is going to one plantation and she's going to the other or staying rather.
anyway and he makes it his mission not to get revenge but simply saving her and maybe some of the other slaves (his main goal is honestly just her)
but then after some stuff that happens they decide they are going to kill the big bad guy, the one in all the memes and they succeed but the Bounty Hunter dies and Django is captured again.
but uses a trick he learned from the Bounty Hunter to get free and then go to the plantation and kills all of the slavers and saves the slaves and his beloved and the movie it ends around here if I remember correctly from my memory and it is a pretty summarized what I just said.
but it's amazing when you watch it and there's such a good chemistry between the German doctor slash Bounty Hunter and Django
and final thing I'm going to say about the movie all the way down here in the bottom, usually don't care too much about a black protagonist, most because I don't watch movies like that I watch cartoons and anime
but I really rooted for Django and this might be the best black people focused movie I've ever seen! so it's funny he is not talking that positive about it