Exposing a Content Thief Stealing Videos with AI
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 чер 2024
- UA-cam is about to get a lot more dystopian
Patreon: / abyssoft
Sponsorships: abyssoft@clovertalent.gg
Business: abyssoftbusiness@gmail.com
Become a member of the community!
Discord: / discord
Twitch: / abyssoft
Twitter: / abyssoft
American Bar article that cites ChatGPT
www.americanbar.org/groups/jo....
Thaler v. Perlmutter case
www.documentcloud.org/documen...
Googles Stance on AI
developers.google.com/search/...
My original video:
• Why The Biggest CHEATE...
My other video they stole edited footage from:
• How Speedrunners DESTR...
Sylvain's Deviantart the AI ripped off
www.deviantart.com/sylvain-t/...
Music
Vividity
@vividity
Novadrome
officialnovadrome.com/
/ realnovadrome
@officialnovadrome
Footage
Normally I put footage credits here, but since the AI used footage I already edited I'm not going to credit it, instead go check out these awesome Mario Karters
Abney
/ abney317
@abney317mk
Matthias
/ mk64mr
/ @mk64mr - Ігри
Robots are literally trying to run me out of a job, consider supporting me on Patreon or becoming a member here on UA-cam: www.patreon.com/abyssoft
4:05 You need to squeeze in Eric Rick into every video from now on. It'll definitely get you all of the views.
Is it ok if I take inspiration and make a “he dodged everything” meme video? I was thinking just clipping game play where I dodge stuff.
@@frosticle6409 This sounds hilarious, but you don't need my permission for it 👌
People used to participate in UA-cam because they loved it. It’s all about cash for you, huh?
@@Martin0 Some people do UA-cam as a hobby, and some people do it as a job because they like it and can earn a living off of doing something they like. There's nothing wrong with either of those. Heck, there's nothing wrong with doing UA-cam solely for the money, either as long as it's done legitimately.
Stealing other peoples' work and trying to frame it as one's own however is not legitimate, whether on UA-cam, or anywhere else.
So let me get this straight: people are cheating…at exposing cheaters…and you’re exposing them. Wow what a world
If you would have told me this was the follow up video I'd be doing to my video on the Habtrio I never would have believed you.
next AI exposing this video
@@AbyssoftI can't till your next video of where you breakdown the AI copy of this video.
The only way this could get worse is if the AI makes a video using this video's script.
@@joshuamunn2410 i love alarmists that don't understand what they're scared of
as a teacher: Yes, that is EXACTLY how we feel, often followed by "if You copy, then at least don't also copy the spelling errors!"
Your literally stealing content anytime you post any video of Nintendos IP. They arent running you out of job. All your doing is stealing others content and passing it off as your own. Make a video without Nintendo's Intellectual Property. Its not hard to speak into a mic if thats what you call a "job". AI is just getting rid of useless people like you that are literal leeches to real creators like the people who made the game Mario Kart.
I've never copied someone else's work, but I have used ai to cheat. What I do is, I change what the ai gave me to make it sound more like I wrote it, while still keeping the information correct. Sometimes I don't like what ai gave me, so I just write it all myself.
As a future teacher. I'm taking the time to learn code, so I can better understand and maybe even use AI to better moderate its use in a classroom. AI is here for good. It's just like the use of internet and later smartphones in the classroom. Learn it now and if you have the skills try making AI programs to catch unethical use of AI in classrooms.
@@ego-lay_atman-baysee... That's kind of a gray area. I liken it to the use of paraphrasing but how do you properly paraphrase an AI while still giving the proper credit to the original writers? What defines using AI properly to assist you in research and documentation, versus the overuse of AI and not doing your own work?
If only UA-cam had a way for users to review and rate content.
I don't know whether to like this comment, because i agree. Or to dislike that doesn't show up to *not* prove a point.
UA-cam got rid of dislikes for political reasons because when you could see that a certain political figure was 90%+ disliked in organic online ratings, people could kinda put 2 and 2 together and realize it was basically impossible for them to fairly win an election.
Yea...maybe some kind of reverse like. A hate. With a hand pointing down. Eh, who knows. Maybe someday.
Maybe a star system! That should’ve been there since the start.
they tried this in 2016
it went to shit
That fact that we have two instances of this happening means there's a high chance there are many other AI copycat videos running amuck just waiting to be revealed. Sadly, I don't think UA-cam will do anything about it.
Stay tuned
These type of videos are rampant in the space and science portion of UA-cam.
@scaryjam8 I report any video with non-human voice over or the smallest hunt of ai
@@ShadowEclipse777 that's absurd.
the complexity of the copies and of detecting them is only going to get more complicated, this type of tech while it seems advanced is actually still in its infancy
Plagiarism is like cheating, and this dude tried to cheat with as little of the human element as possible.
You need to be clever to get away with shit these days…..this idiot isn’t clever
Not very Tod Todgers of them
They started the plagiarism already in second gear
Your literally stealing content anytime you post any video of Nintendos IP. They arent running you out of job. All your doing is stealing others content and passing it off as your own. Make a video without Nintendo's Intellectual Property. Its not hard to speak into a mic if thats what you call a "job". AI is just getting rid of useless people like you that are literal leeches to real creators like the people who made the game Mario Kart.
4:01 Hadrich, habrich, the habrick, hamrik, hedrik, after Hebert, Eric Rick, the Hab. Haa.
lmao
ah my favorite speedrunner-found-cheater, The Hab
The Han sounds like a cool name honestly
Hab
Ha is my favorite
mf named eric rick
As a former teacher, yeah, that's pretty spot on for how it comes across when students copy poorly.
😂
I got halfway through marking one assignment before coming across a particular phrase seemed very familiar.
I checked through what i had already marked. Found that exact same line. All they had changed was the name on the top (and possibly the font, it was about 2 years ago).
This is why i only mark work when the majority of students have returned it, and do it in one sitting whenever possible.
We have turnitin, but i am sure there are plenty of ways around it. Ai and tracking is already an arms race, set to only get worse for teachers (and students, cos we don't know what they don't know if we cannot give them reliable feedback).
@@turbo8628Oh man; one major education instituion did use the AI Tracking for TurnItIn, but it was turned off after due to poor reaction.
Teach them how to copy better - its an extremely valuable skill in todays business world.
@@turbo8628Some possible reasons why someone may try to cheat, is that they may not have understood the topic, or just procrastinated (or just have some disability that makes it hard for them to start, or remember all the information they learned in class). I personally think ai can help. I personally use ai responsibly, such as, I read over what the ai gave me, correcting some things that I know, changing wording to make it sound more like me while still keeping the information correct, and sometimes just rewriting a whole section when I don't like it. If I were to copy off someone else, I would do the same thing. Because of that, I feel that it might be good to go over how to copy responsibly at the beginning of the year, just in case someone didn't understand the topic, and they're too scared to go to the teacher.
I just love how the AI just gave up trying to say his name and just went with “Ha”.
Dude thanks to you for giving me creddits (i'm the artist who have done the toad used in his miniature), hope youtube will be doing something for you and the others creators that have been in similar situations, like, giving you back their vews
If you click the link to the AI video it says it was taken down by a DMCA, did you file? And would you be up for sharing the email address on file for them if you did?
@@Abyssoft hey, yep that's me, what did you mean by "did you file" ? i'm a little bit lost here ^^'
@@Sylvain-T oh, I was just asking if it was you that issued the DMCA and not an impersonator, I'm likely doing a follow up video to this about the problem at large.
Did UA-cam provide you with an email for the rip off account when you filled out the paper work? I'd like to contact them myself
@@Abyssoft ok, so, yes that's me who did the DMCA, i hope that's not a problem for you, i didn't get any email but i've received a notification on my youtube account, i can provide you a screenshot of it if you want ? Via discord ?
The abuse of synonyms is crazy
“Micro-turbos” LMFAOOO
Brought to you by the same genius that probably made shit like “Small fast-goes” and “in this video, we will….” And “…..in conclusion,…”
AI: throw the script through a thesaurus and call it good.
AI : fling the lines through a lexicon and name it acceptable
Fake Intelligence: launch the words into a dictionary and state it is fair.
@@N0AHOfficial
Artificial Intelligence: input the words into a lexicon and affirm its fairness.
@@berrystarcreations mechanical intellect: shove thy text through a wordbook then deem it's qualified.
2:56 bro this is 10 year old me trying to reword a wikipedia article for school lmao
4:53 Wow! I recognize this footage because it is from my own DexDrive save from decades ago, truncated just before I cleared the wall. Karl Jobst used the footage under fair use at 14:37 on one of his vids (linked from one of my playlists.) Obviously you used it under fair use as well, but the AI vid's usage is dubious at best.
And this wouldn't be the first time my stuff has been taken. One web site in the 90s took my Mario 64 rabbit glitch and translated it into Spanish word for word. Nintendo Power took my Frappe Snowland lap skip discovery when I posted it on their BBS. These incidents were partially influential in why I made my own site, to help give credit where it is due.
But even that didn't stop thieves. One of my Smash Bros. 4 discoveries was stolen in more recent years, among many of the older SMB2 findings but that's a story for another day.
It seems I can't make a Mario Kart video without you being involved in some way ;)
You should definitely mention that people shouldn't brigade the thief's video because posting any comments, even negative ones, and giving downvotes do nothing but increase a video's engagement factor and make it more likely to be recommended to others. All you do is help a video by posting a comment and voting.
a dislike actually has a negative effect, especially when a video reaches like 40-50% dislikes it's over and nobody will get it recommended
@@_Ludwig__ So that's false.
Whats your source on that?
@@Darxide23 no it isn't
@@_Ludwig__ lmao no, I remember extra credits horrible video, 2 of them actually. Would get recommended a lot, despite having like 90% dislikes.
My heart goes out to Eric Hamsandwich for the besmirchment of his name.
I'd reccomend filing a copyright claim against the video to be honest. Its a longshot dont get me wrong but its probably a good idea since the plaigarism is so blatant
I've spoken with a lawyer, can't say much beyond that right now.
Yeah, had I been in your shoes, I would have immediately filed a DMCA takedown. “I’ve spoken with a lawyer” is definitely a valid alternative (possibly the best course of action you can take). I hope this works out for you!
@@PaulFisher In general, it is wise to speak to a lawyer before filing a DMCA takedown. You are required to make specific statements under penalty of perjury, and can be sued for damages (i.e. lost ad revenue) if you file an invalid DMCA takedown. You could even be criminally prosecuted if the takedown is fraudulent, but that's rather uncommon in practice.
(Side note: If you happen to be a UA-cam content creator, and you've gotten a "real" copyright strike, not a Content ID claim, then you may also want to speak to a lawyer about whether it's valid and what remedies might be available if it is not.)
@@Abyssoftthankfully ai generted media can't be monetized under us law, a comic book already got pulled for using pure ai imagery, bring that up in court
@@shinyrayquaza9where are you getting that info? All I can find is they can't be copyrighted which isn't the same thing
AI is completely overrunning UA-cam.
There are channels that have hundreds of thousands of subscribers, predominantly just reading manga and showing panels. While this might be a passion project for someone reading a script, it’s blatant plagiarism on top of an obvious cash-grab for AI to be used to do so.
Videos read by AI that don’t create original content don’t deserve to be on UA-cam, and at the very least should be demonetized.
It doesn’t really matter which method they used, but because of how sloppy and obviously plagiarized it is, they didn’t really give it much thought either. These types of things need a hard stop put in very soon, it is so egregiously boring and lazy.
You're right.
This A.I has to stop.
I say we take down A.I.
I don’t care how the A.I. lovers feel about it, I just think it needs to be gone ASAP
@@havocadvent2A.I. is a valuable tool for people,maybe not the help you know or would expect,but A.I. really did something here.I don't think we are getting rid of it any soon.
@emptyglass7867 wait whaaaat??? That’s actually pretty awful I didn’t even know that existed
Maybe they could do with ai what they did with the reddit story reading channels that blew up readonly a few years ago
I've run into a lot of AI as narration on videos. Even if those are made legitimately, it's still very offputting as pronunciations are often wrong and the emotions are flat. It makes the whole thing feel lazy. The video you found is on another level and I hope they get smacked down promptly.
mfw my voice naturally sounds like an ai 💀
@@SundreeOFFICIALmaybe put a bit of personality into your voice then?
Of course they're lazy. They're made to make quick cash .
The worst ones are the ai what ifs for anime’s specifically dragon ball
Some names in dragon ball are just Japanese puns or straight up Japanese words so the ai would call a character something else like gohan fried rice and it sound so silly but annoying
@@monkepopbloon2307 hahahaha God that sounds terrible. And if people complain about it in the comments, I'm sure the YT algorithm likes that engagement. Gohan Fried Rice for everyone
This is kinda infuriating. On UA-cam nowadays there is a chance that your video gets stolen either by low effort reaction channels who add nothing to the original video and just copy and paste it next to their face cam without crediting nobody or it gets ripped off by AI. Both of these methods of content theft are getting more and more common by the day and UA-cam is doing very little to prevent or reverse theft.
Even worse is just how many people are not only content with this slop, but actively encourage it just because the tech has benefits that they're never gonna capitalize on. They're fine with doing nothing about the worst parts of AI just because they want their dumb presidents playing games videos.
Just put them with the dozens reddit post-reading videos. Lazy and greedy af.
God this is the future huh. Endless seas of auto-generated soulless AI sludge. Thanks techbros
Only if people stop supporting actual content and move entirely to fake shit
@@BJGvideos Seeing how a large chunk of our current population is incapable of avoiding browser toolbar mayhem and defenseless against obvious clickbaits it's only a matter of time until we get to a stage where UA-cam can't ignore this anymore.
@@Mosethyoth Not sure why that would lead to real people somehow not making real content though. Or why anybody would watch soulless bullshit. We have a choice to watch things.
I like AI stuff, but like using it to deplete work and just be lazy is stupid
Also thank the UA-camrs who are just using it for goofy trends, it’s like the one thing I kinda hate that jacksfilm is doing with his channel
Oh! I know this! So knowing how got works, what they probably did is rip the script using the transcript feature, removed the timestamps, then told ChatGPT to "reword the script" this is why words are swapped around and mini is now micro.
ChatGBT is technically against Copyright infringement but they suck at enforcing it
Can we get an AI debunking an AIs video?
That would have been a great comedy routine for this video, maybe next time.
@@Abyssoft get a whole AI inception going. Then it'll be nothing but AIs debunking more AIs debunking other AIs.
Woganog mentioned in the replies to his comment that the people who stole their videos also stole a video exposing them, so honestly, who even knows. Funnily enough, automating to such an extent and potentially screwing up like that might actually be worth risking to the thiefs, as opposed to wasting extra time to check. A video is a video. The likelyhood of a video being any more self destructive for them to steal than anything else they do or even have much of a chance to change the amount of veiws they get, or whatever they are after, is probably marginal, so it's not worth it to the thiefs to vet the video's contents.
@@dimetime35c this would be semi usefull because, a it clogs the ai content creators up. b it could provide researchers a way to fast id the ai by disecting the resulting data. lastly it would actually improve ai as well too at the risk of creating a worse problem.
Not only do they steal but they steal in THE laziest way possible holy crap man
In this case, the use of AI is irrelevant imo. It's strictly a copyright issue, AI was just one of the tools used because it makes it even simpler than ever if you aren't trying to create quality content. You could submit a copyright takedown on the video and hope the YT algorithm lottery is in your favor, though I dunno if it's worth the effort to play whack-a-mole with random content thieves.
YT has never cared about stuff like this and likely never will, unfortunately.
Especially since the only AI part of this other than transcription and text to speech (which have been around for decades) is the unproven possibility (however likely) that the transcript was rewritten by ChatGPT.
And oftentimes when it seems to care it targets legit content. An example of that would be Sciencephile A.I. who as a science channel it has 2 appeals: the memes and the loquendo presentation to seem like made by computer.
Sadly UA-cam's algorithm is unable to recognize parody from the real thing, so it was constantly targeted as AI mass-made content.
AI is relevant, bc the person who copied the video can argue that he used prompts with an AI to make an "original" video
The problem with appealing to copyright is that his original video is *technically* copyright infringement - it uses Nintendo's copyrighted characters in a video without their permission. It's just not enforced. 80% of the internet is unenforced copyright infringement - practically every meme falls under this. The DMCA is a broken document that is not built for the internet, and I don't think more copyright is the answer (which is what a lot of anti-AI people want).
@@cinthiaMP I mean we have literally no evidence an AI was used to change the wording around. Gut could have just fed it through google translate once or twice and that would have changed the wording.
I have seen people steal my SpeedRuns and make them into UA-cam shorts. It is basically a regular occurrence to get at least one video stolen at one point
IIRC, you can set the videos on UA-cam to not be able to be "remixed" in shorts.
@@freebrickproductions that won't stop people from screen recording the videos using 3rd party software
I’ve noticed this too. There’s too many videos with voiceovers that just don’t sound right… dialect and mannerisms that don’t sound human.
To be fair some of those may just be people with awkward deliveries.
Looking forward to the AI video of this video exposing AI duping videos.
Inception! 😊
Got a laugh out of the AI trying players' names. Best of luck taking this down, man
Maybe my humor is broken, but the compilation of the ai's pronunciation of Eric Habrich's name had me rolling.
T H E H A M
I like how Haverick gradually devolved into “Hubert”. XD
And then "Ha".
Once you start looking closely, you'll notice that there's a LOT of this trash on UA-cam nowadays. And a lot of people seem to be none the wiser.
Its flooding shorts too, its so infuriating
As a content creator, this is extremely scary.
Not just because content can get stolen, but eventually made content will lose its credit, for the possibility of it being AI-generated.
Artists have been fighting against this stuff for a year now, and the only response the internet had every time was "lol cry more and get a real job. Horses went out of style when cars were invented even though cab drivers are still a thing."
I already don't trust images on social media anymore. I have to do further research to prove if what I'm seeing is real or generated.
@@Mrhellslayerzi disagree, i've seen plenty of opposition to AI art online. There certainly are a lot of those "Here's how to make money ripping others off with AI in 5 easy steps" types, but i've honestly seen less of them than people opposed to AI art.
Could you imagine if an AI ripped off this exact video. So that an AI rips off a video about an AI ripping off a video
Imagine how badly the guys name would get messed up😂
One way could be to put permanent watermark in your video but change its position over the course. Also place the watermark in such a position that it doesnt disturb the viewer but will cover key information if it was cut out of the video.
Perfect. People who try to plagiarize will be in for a rude awakening.
I'm pretty sure some stealers have been TRAINED for stuff like that. NES multicarts are a great example of this.
That reminds me of the old days, where people had a watermark
in any of the four corners to catch shameless reuploaders
I hate to be "that guy", but artists have struggled with thieves removing watermarks long before AI started stealing their art. Reaction channels still run rampant, random leach companies will abuse copyright regardless, and techbros have been controlling the conversation for a year now. A watermark won't fix this for content creators at all.
@@Mrhellslayerz Exactly. Similarly, pirated copies of NES games & NES multicarts from back in the late 80s-early 90s tended to remove the copyrights on them.
This is so bizarre to witness, yet absolutely makes sense. People are already copying videos, so using AI to do with 5% of the effort is the logical next step.
Fortunately we're still able to discern AI generated stuff from human made, but that is not going to be the case forever.
I'm not sure if YT are going to start doing something to address this issue, but I also think it might be too late anyway. Really not looking forward to having YT flooded with more shitty AI slop.
"Ha! He wouldn't acknowledge lying on camera, as he wasn't a virgin" 💀
The fact there are so many grammatical errors that not even ChatGPT would make is especially telling
And the worst part is that nothing will ever be done about it. And in a couple years this will be accepted as unfortunate reality rather than something we could have stopped and nipped in the bud.
Could but didn't.
Even then it's mainly masses that just are the partial contributors
Plagiarism is definitely the copyright rule to use to back your DMCA takedown of the copy . The case you quoted only takes away some of _their_ copyright, not yours . As an all out mangled copy, they will have as little stance as the people who uploaded stolen movies mirrored left to right years ago .
The part with Eric's name took me out 😂 But it's unbelievable that we have reached this point now. Content farms were bad enough already, but this is a new level of bullshit.
Part of the issue is that video essay style videos are much easier to rip off than other types, since what makes a video essay unique is the "essay", and we all know that AI is good a writing essays at this point. For other forms of content, like animation (especially 3D animation), complex edits, and vlogs, it is much more difficult to rip someone off, as the work needed to produce a ripoff would be almost as hard, if not harder, than the work it took to make the original video. The problem with these AI video essays is it is super simple to just feed the script to a program and have it pump something out that is similar and then make an AI voice for it, and the edits for a lot of video essays tend to be more simple and use footage that is publicly available and easy to obtain, making it harder for UA-cam to recognize that content as "yours".
Indeed. It's a shame how many people in the comments are using this to confirm their biases about how A.I is innately bad and will ruin all creative fields etc. Talk about throwing the baby out with the bathwater. This is fundamentally a copyright/theft issue imo, with A.I being the method; it shouldn't be taken as an indictment of A.I in general.
I mean it seems kinda bad at essay writing too… or maybe the plagiariser is just horrible at re-wording stuff.
I find it kind of amusing going through UA-cam shorts and seeing just how much AI spam content there really is. I'm at the point where 9/10 times I can spot an AI video from presentation alone.
AI can only handle scripts and still images, maybe the voiceover too if you can find a good TTS program (not that the average AI video bothers with a good one). The editing and underlying content all have to be handled by a human. The poor presentation that AI generated videos are known for is all of the parts that can't be ripped from someone else or shoved through an AI being given the absolute bare minimum of effort by the human behind them.
If they had the skill and motivation to properly edit and format their video, they would also have the skill and motivation create their own content and wouldn't bother with AI generated plagarism.
As someone who has known people who dealt with ripping other people's videos for cyberbullying. This is worse and if not more deplorable.
As a computer programmer AI is coming for all our jobs including mine
Same with artists, receptionist and more
If we dont regulate this youll find all of our jobs being affected by it in a few years if not sooner
I think it's a bit cynical to say so because the reality is we aren't sure what sort of limitations AI has especially in the coming years of advancement. That being said its entirely possible and I hope you are wrong for everyone's sake.
@@ngcf4238 3 or so years ago AI was just like a "that's cool" thing
Now it's coming for real jobs
I don't wanna be cynical but it is concerning at the very least
AI won't stop learning, it's able to learn 24 hours a day 365
We might find a situation where labor jobs are all that's available
Of course I hope that doesn't become true
As a computer programmer, you’re a fool
If you think software engineering is about writing code, then you're probably not a software engineer. Even if AI was writing 99% of my code, I'd be far from out of a job. I'd simply be able to focus on more important things.
There's always a contrarian because it's the internet
Cuz automation has never cost jobs before.............. EVER
Ya if you optimize everything and have AI writing your code you might just see your department shrink from 5 devs too 1
But who cares long as you are a contrarian on the internet
If it's something to assist with a creatively motivated work like Joel Haver that's one thing. It's basically doing the rotoscoping for him, but he's deciding color, doing love acting, compositing, script writing, etc. But AI doing the writing, composition, or illustration process for someone is bullshit, especially if it's trained on other people's art without permission.
I remember Kyle Hill discussing about this as well, more specifically the space related channels, he also mentioned they tend to copy the channel icon style (which in this case was black and white colored theme).
The most scary part is: You may not even know if it's AI generated or not, as they tend to be better at creating/ripping off stuff.
Documentary channels and stuff like that are hard to detect, even worse because ai gets stuff wrong and they could just be spouting nonsense that people will believe
I can't get over the fact that they used a fucking _Dennis Prager_ AI voice.
I can definitely agree that it seems someone used AI to rip off your video, and I'm really sorry that happened. Hearing the edited script reminds me of an assignment in high school where we had to paraphrase quotes from a source and read out our examples. Its a shame that they didn't choose to provide their own opinoins or unique telling of events instead of blatantly copying your video. Even if they felt like the technical explanations weren't needed (which I disagree with) they could've found a better way to tell the story rather than just cutting things out. And, of course, they didn't even bother to at least credit their inspiration. Hopefully this doesn't happen again and the UA-cam community finds a reasonable solution.
Eric Rick, The Hab... Haa.
Why is it when machines mess up, its so satisfying.
AI-based true crime channels like Mysterious 7 are particularly rampant right now
this is reminding me of a Folding Ideas video (i believe the one about the mikkelsen twins?) in which he details a scheme some people do where they hire someone to ghost write a book for them, hire someone else to narrate it as an audiobook, all for dirt cheap, & then post it on amazon. they flood the market with complete trash. this is like if those assholes used AI and plagiarism for every step of the process, so now it’s stolen and completely incomprehensible trash! gotta love innovation :)
I'm getting so sick of these fake AI videos, they ruin everything...
In the Transcript Menu you can click on the three dots and turn off the timestamps, so it's even easier to copy and paste video scripts.
It's really sad to see that people abuse this feature.. hope youtube will do something against this
Well that popular download script can download CC since day 1 so you can't stop them anyway. In fact doing so does more harm than good. The actual solution to this IMO is that something needs to be changed on copyright law enforcement so these cases (which are already violating the law but punishing them is HARD) can be punished appropriately. It's not easy but at least it won't do unnecessary harm to the preservationists, journalists, or even Internet as a whole.
@@voidmain7902 Yeah, I also never meant to say that youtube should do something against the feature, no, I rather meant that youtube should do something about these video stealers
We need LegalEagle and other legal UA-camrs to cover your case and maybe even covering various laws in various legal areas (e.g. US, China, UK) in case of the AI copy being made outside of the US.
Well first you'd need to prove an AI was being used. Then you'd need to show why an AI changes any part of the law. An AI is just a tool. Even if an AI was used it doesn't hold the rights of a person so an AI cant hold a copyright on material it produces. Only a person can hold copyright on material an AI produces. Meaning that Even if an AI made 100% of the vide, you'd still just go after whoever was the person that uploaded it.
Asking for legal counsel from a UA-cam lawyer (if we can even call LegalEagle that) is like taking medical advice from a TV doctor.
@@dkosmari i was thinking as it could give publicity
@@dkosmariWe can call him that, as he’s a practicing lawyer.
@@RenSako When did he last defend a client? He clearly doesn't even understand the Constitution or legal precedents. I've seen at least a dozen different lawyers facepalm at the nonsense he spouts.
literally a minute in and the thumbnail alone gives it away lmfao
I wonder if UA-cam was never not dystopian
I just saw Johnny2Cellos complaining about a similar problem happening to him a couple days ago. Seems like low effort plagiarism is becoming more easy for people to pull off on UA-cam.
I think AI should be handled like sponsors in videos - clearly labeled, and noted what it is used for
I agree AI can be a fantastic tool for all sorts of things. But people can just be unscrupulous when it comes to try and gain any form of fame
It would be great for artists to learn from, especially if drawn from CONSENTING CONTENT and not stolen stuff. I'd love to be able to input my writing and see what comes out so I could analyse it, but the problem is finding a program that won't steal my writing or use someone else's stolen work.
Ai, when it comes to art, is roundabout piracy legally speaking. It is legal to make "parodies" that mix and match the content, but the content must show that it is a parody and not the original product which the ai normally fails to mention.
Y'see what happened was they told a high-school student to write about the topic "in their own words" and then used that (The student's essay got an A- btw)
Yeah, crap like that. It's why I would rather add my own personal writing tics in there when writing essays rather than be "professional"(A.K.A. look like an emotionless human being with not a single hint of even *the most microscopic bit* of a personality).
This crap is why I avoid everything that uses machine voices.
8:48 there are (technically though barely illegal) tools to download a video, and they generally include subtitles in text form as a setting. The consistency is to be doubted, as I only know this from docs and haven’T tried it, but I can reasonably assume it’s just polling subtitles
9:46 again likely yt_dlp
So I watched this yesterday and today I found an ENTIRE CHANNEL full of these stolen IA videos, I can't believe it how uncanny this feels
I know it’s so stupid it’s like AI and green screen kids are teaming up lol
The scary part is AI is going to keep getting better, and harder to tell genuine content, from generated. I don't like AI. I usually watch ymfah's challenge runs, but his last upload was an AI discussion between some tv personalities. I couldn't tell they were generated voices, already.
I don't like the idea of just typing into a prompt and out pops infinite content. All you need is an idea, and bam, you have what you want. I think it can be a great idea iterator: show me pictures of a house made of pasta, and then you go off that to make your own, on your own.
I really don't like how it just samples and smooths between things it picks out. It seems like plagiarism. "But artists do that, too!" No, they look at someone else's art, and find their own understanding of it.
I'm reminded of Mother's Basement. Five years ago, a Brazillian UA-camr took his videos (among others) and translated them. The same issues happened here. They were translations without taking into account whether the sentences made sense. And that's likely because Google Translate was used compared to ChatGPT. The bigger issue is Plagiarism, though we can't entirely divorce this plagiarism from the fact that AI was used to automate the processes that the accused didn't have to do.
I'm much more lenient with the translation cases, with those you can at least very well argue that it might be a well-meaning but poor attempt at just genuinely trying to share videos they like with other people who don't speak the original language.
I've read my fair share of poorly translated manga and although I knew the translations were ass I still appreciated it as I could at least try and get a tiny bit of understanding to what's going on.
That voice is either TTS, or perfectly mimics the style used by the "10 surprising facts about cats (#7 will destroy your understanding of reality)" types of creators. I swear I've heard that voice talk about cats before.
Let’s get this to the front page. I for one am appalled that someone would do this. Let’s get UA-cam to see this clear theft of honest work.
When are people gonna start taking action against this AI bullshit? Its already become extremely problematic, and has brought us nothing but mildly amusing dialogue re-writes.
Theres a reason stories about AI taking over have been told for ages.
Someone needs to put a stop to this nonsense by all means necessary.
You should be less worried about AI and more worried about what people will use AI to do.
@DarkGob but if the AI was gone the problem would be solved, scummy people is a problem that can never be fixed, AI theoretically should be.
@@TheRealSuperKirbyIf you take away all knives in the world, there won't be any stabbing. But would it solve the problem itself or would it just remove the symptoms?
@notaginger4888 knifes can help us in countless situations, all AI does is encourage people to be lazy in even more ways than we already are.
@@TheRealSuperKirby "AI can help us in countless situations, all knives do is encourage people to be lazy in even more ways than they already are. Who needs to cut stuff when you can tear it apart with your strength?". I mean, AI is nothing more than a simple tool. I agree that we need to make some laws about AI and copyright, but banning AI just because there are hacks that use it in frivolous ways is plain luddism.
This is just absurd at this point AI already steals art but videos now too?! we seriously need to set boundaries for AI
Cuz nothing is sacred, nothing is special, everything is the lowest common denominator cuz some think it's the best
A human can be.
I'm sure laws and rules will be set eventually, all of this will reach a fever pitch at some point and the only people who really like all this bullshit AI stuff is techbros in the Silicon Vally. The majority will get stuff set in place eventually.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised the guy stealing everything with AI wouldn't proofread a single thing it made.
"we have a focus on showing content that's high quality"
I searched for an image of a screaming cat and got an AI generated one that had a human mouth....
So much wrong with what they're doing, but worst of all is that they did almost nothing that actually runs afoul of creators' only effective offensive tool-- copyright laws. If they were more careful about which assets they lifted - avoiding yours & others' edits and graphics - it would just be a lazy knock-off of your idea. UA-cam needs to get on top of this new tier of garbage ASAP. As usual, low-effort bottom-feeding remains profitable because the video hosting sites don't have appropriate or adequate policies and tools to discourage it.
AI's been trained to do so much cool shit but it still can't give a little more enthusiasm in the voice over 🤣
This is ridiculous! I hate the idea of people working hard to make a video only to have it stolen by someone
This is nuts ! And it will take years to get laws passed against it … just awful what ppl will do for a quick buck !
It's illuminating to see what happens when AI is trained on a small number of sources. Usually the people behind these things get a lot of plausible deniability because they scrape enough content that it's hard to prove who they're stealing from at any given time, but to me, this proves that AI is not capable of original work.
We anthropomorphize AI because it's called AI, but it's just a fancy search engine. It interprets your keywords and spits out snippets of other people's content it thinks is relevant. The only difference is it doesn't list its sources. The fact that people are trying to pass this stuff off as their own work is baffling to me.
I do think it has its uses. "Summarize this article I wrote in just a few sentences." But creating things should not be one of them.
Tell that to all the UA-cam channels that turn Wikipedia articles into 10 minute videos lol.
An obvious and blatant attempt at ripping off a video beat-for-beat is proof AI is not capable of original work?
C'mon. This was a shitty thing to do on the copier's part, but don't put down all AI just because you chose the worst possible example of an AI making original work -- an instance where the AI was literally instructed to copy someone else's work.
The AI did exactly as instructed. Don't blame the tool for the hand wielding it. That's like saying because you used a pencil to trace someone else's drawing, pencils can never be used to create original art.
"it's just a fancy search engine. It interprets your keywords and spits out snippets of other people's content it thinks is relevant."
That isn't remotely close to how it works. That's a common disinformation version of how it works.
@@Dave-rd6sp Two people enter the same Google query, they get different results. Search engines don't even really search keywords anymore. They try to interpret what you mean. It's functionally no different than how an LLM works.
could be really worth reaching out to leonard french as he is a copyright attorney on youtube that may look into it!
I had somebody in my group at uni working on a group essay. I had volunteered to assimilate all 6 people's works before handing in the final product. I noticed that, in addition to his part being far shorter than what we were expecting, it didn't answer the question. The way was based around a UK supermarket and, when I Googled the first sentence of his part, up came a page from that supermarket's own website which was almost identical, even down to word order. I copied the website text into Word and right-clicked any word that was different from his essay and, sure enough, the first synonym was always exactly what he put. I couldn't let the rest of the group suffer for his actions, so I reported the evidence privately but also told him what I'd noticed and gave him a chance to rewrite it. He refused, so I stayed up the night before the due date and write his part myself. He was out of the university 3 weeks later.
Also, I have a law degree and studied intellectual property and the way people will steal entire videos, repost them and quote text straight from the statue about fair use, claiming that it's "commentary" is absurd. I even saw someone do this with a music video - nothing contributed by them, just the video, citing the US copyright statue (despite the original video being by a Scottish band) and claiming that they were"commenting" on the work.
I can't get over the change from "He Fooled Everyone" to "He Dodged Everybody!" He dodged them? What, like a ninja?
well we're at a point now where someone could potentially put a whole automated tool chain together - where all you need to do is show the system a video - and say to it - "make me a similar video that I can upload to get similar amounts of views" and the system will do it. And if thats not quite possible yet - we're only months away from it. Kinda crazy really.
And yet people defend and justify it with no care how shady or disingenuous they are.
I agree creators having to disclose uses of AI for content creation is probably a good first step, at least until something more effective is found/made/implemented.
“the hab” is killing me
"as I'm literally competing with robots for my livelihood"
welcome to the future, homeboy
also remember this is something someone from the general public has done with ai. just imagine what has been going on behind closed doors with ai..
"Should AI be able to-"
No. The answer is no. There's no such thing as moral AI content generation and there never will be.
only creators can understand this....editing and creating original contents is very time consuming and a huge effort, there is passion on every video, the thinking process, the script, etc....being stolen like this is not acceptable
This seems like they put the entire script through an online paraphrasing tool. And yes, those exist and have since before ChatGPT was made public.
4:43 Imagine revealing that you cheated and you happened to be a virgin too!
Seriously, what does that have to do with anything? 🤣
A.I. Would not have anything to rip-off, if it was’nt for human talent and imagination. What Will happen when there are no more human content creators?.
Why would there be no more human content creators? Why would an entire species just stop making content?
@@BJGvideosHi welcome to the human race; where war is waged for the pettiest reasons, create trash islands spanning entire country-lengths, and endanger animals for horny freaks to pleasure themselves! We you hope you continue to be amazed at just how awful people can be to anything with a pulse, because we seem to be good at ignoring that fact.
@@BJGvideosWhat they mean is what will happen when humanity no longer exists. Its often theorized that the ais would regurgitate the same stuff to each other until the internet no longer exists.
Man that’s so bad. I hate it. I don’t really know what kind of policy would work to prevent this kind of thing but I hope google are taking this stuff seriously
There is also download captions tools that download captions. Then they probably insert it into rewrite software.
I know UA-cam doesn't have any policies, but I reported the bot's account, and the video, for impersonation. It is impersonating the concept of 'being the source of that video'. There wasn't anything relevant under the Report button, and I was afraid that just clicking "Other" wouldn't let me explain why the video is contentious (something that Google is often guilty of, if you try to report something on Google Discover).
If UA-cam doesn't like the report system being used in that way, they should suck less at moderation. They should give more of a shit about what Fair Use is (and is not), and look beyond the surface of transparent grifts like this.
I liked that you touched on the laws and yt policies.
Also, the people who copied (and basically stole) your content post content under different accounts and platforms. Best keep an eye out
There's likely going to be a part 2 for this video
Hell yeah, expose these losers 👏🏽
Eric "the rib" Ha. Is a great pro wrestling name.
This is starting to feel like an SCP or creepypasta with how things that are very much not human are pretending to be human and getting small pieces wrong.
Or some story about code compilers intentionally editing code, I don't remember what it was but it was some story about computers slowly testing out how they would edit things and take over, one tiny change at a time.
This (this video, not the AI video being referenced) is a really well made video. I remember watching your videos a while ago.
On an unrelated note, you sound like text to speech too.😂
You've made it fam. The robots are jealous of your video making prowess.
There's a Premiere plugin that can autoedit a video. They'd still need to download the clips, but that plugin can edit for you.
This reminds me of a meme where a student stole an essay and replaced the words with synonyms. The teacher ended up seeing "unused york city" on that student's paper