No. The buck stops iwth the CEO. The old CEO should be held liable. Again, another CEO throws the subordinates under the bus. The CEO is responsible for the direction, and the culture (by extension the people of the company). If he/she fails to fix these problems, the problem rests ultimately with them. If they can't accept resonsibility, they don't deserve the large paycheck.
maybe the cure is to have a NATIONWIDE instruction TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES to absolutely IGNORE any report made by hertz concerning "stolen" cars.
Well their clerical errors play a big part in my car rental decisions…
3,000+ clerical errors? Lies!
Who the hell would rent from Hertz at this point?
No. The buck stops iwth the CEO. The old CEO should be held liable. Again, another CEO throws the subordinates under the bus. The CEO is responsible for the direction, and the culture (by extension the people of the company). If he/she fails to fix these problems, the problem rests ultimately with them. If they can't accept resonsibility, they don't deserve the large paycheck.
So how dose a company have 230 clerical errors? GTFOH
Because it is a company run by people. People make mistakes. Were you born yesterday? This isn't a new phenomenon.