“Kill Napoleon Bonaparte!” - Napoleon Clip (2023)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 січ 2024
- Watch the official clip from Napoleon! Available now on Digital.
A personal look at the French military leader’s origins and swift, ruthless climb to emperor, viewed through the prism of Napoleon’s addictive, volatile relationship with his wife and one true love, Josephine.
© Sony Pictures - Розваги
Is the lesson we’ve learned here that bitter old Englishmen shouldn’t be allowed to make films about the most famous French military commander in history?
He’s not a historian . He’s a director that tells stories. I don’t understand why people are upset about a fictional movie .
@@joelogan6286people are upset because it disrespects a well respected and reasonably inspirational historical figure . It’s really stupid how people come to say what you’re saying. It’s obvious. Why is kingdom of heaven (directors cut) not universally hated for the same reason ? Because it captures the spirit and respects the legendary figures in the movie (Baldwin and Saladin). It shows the characters the respect and humanity that they were described with by others. Napoleon does none of this. It is both inaccurate (as was KoH) and disrespectful/reductive (as KoH certainly was not).
@@joelogan6286 the real story is way more interesting than watching an Englishmen shit on the memory of Napoleon
@@joelogan6286oh amigo o gênero do filme é "histórico" e não "ficção científica".
oh friend, the genre of the film is "historical" and not "science fiction".😊
@@Player-unknown93 But how are people supposed to know that? Every person who is not an admirer of history would assume that this is the great Napoleon. It sets a precedent for future films about historical figures and their stories that could shape their place in history because a director decided to get a bit creative
I used to think that this movie was a tragedy.. But now I realize it's a comedy..
Nice Joker reference 😂
All I have....are negative reviews!
If you view it more as a comedy it’s more watchable
the part when he falls off the stairs reminds me of the Joker perssecution
Nice reference lol. 😂
I love how the French army always respected and followed Napoleon until their end. Those guys didn't want France to go back to the old days and Napoleon always took care of his soldiers to the greatest extent that he could.
Leaders who were former military members tent to have a better relationship with Soldiers then leaders who weren't, they know how the average Soldier feels and what problems they face, this movie is still a disgrace to Napoleon thoe.
r u napoleon?
@@tiagomonteiro130
@@tiagomonteiro130this movie portrays Napoleon as an old, cowardly, bitter man when in reality he was charismatic, highly loved, highly intelligent, and a brilliant leader overall. Ridley is just a bitter old Englishman and should have never made this multi million dollar pile of crap!
The French Revolution accomplished nothing and was destructive
@@gusfring6887 Scott made one of the best movies one french napoleonic ages ; the duellists. It was his first film. A pictural movie with painting references inspired by a true history of two french hussards. See this film if you do not know.
0:49 Napoleon quoted "Oh f*ck." while falling down the stairs
Hahahahahahahaha omg
If the French dub says 'oh p*tain* that would be hilarious 😂
I would do same thing so can we blame him ?
I almoast died of laughing! hahahaha
Honestly, this scene could have passed in a batter movie. It’s a good balance of ridiculousness and history that would fit well in a movie that was actually coherent.
Scene *
@@biggbimpworld1318 sorry this was posted in that 1 am mode of thought, fixed now
Could fit in a Death of Stalin-esque version of the coup
People often mention how evil he was after Russia, but if that were true, why would men follow him after, even willing to help him regain power without a single soldier shooting him after orders from their king? I don’t think an evil man would be alive after all of that, that’s why I respect the absolute fck out of Napoleon
@@GetoffmearseHitler also had loyal followers after his death. People will follow what/who they think is right.
Ridley Scott made Blackhawk Down. One of the most faithful military movies of all time. Seriously it’s 1 to 1 with the book.
Then makes…this. This must have been an intentional hit piece on Napoleon
Actually it wasn't accurate since the UN forces that rescue the US forces were actually Malaysian and not Indian. Furthermore, some Malaysian Peacekeepers died rescuing those US soldiers yet the film omitted their contribution but instead portray the peacekeepers just transporting the injured. Naturally, Malaysian weren't please their soldiers weren't given respect for their help in that movie.
@@MrTerrorist irl there were both Malaysian and Pakistani troops to rescue them
@@MrTerrorist I haven't watched the movie in a while, but I remember them mentioning Pakistani forces and according to Wikipedia, they also mentioned Malaysian forces, both as part of the UN rescue convoy. Criticism about dismissing the role of the Pakistani/Malaysian forces came from both countries, not just Malaysia. But it isn't surprising that the film focused on Americans, as introducing new factions at the end of the movie would have disrupted the narrative pacing, even if it would have been more accurate. There's also the merging of individuals into single characters, which is often done in films to reduce the narrative noise when there are too many characters/actors involved in the plot. Some relatively small logistical decisions were changed.
Besides that the film is a reasonable portrayal of the events, seemingly far better than Napoleon. That being said I wouldn't treat any piece of media as historical fact. I find criticising movie accuracy a bit pointless because it is not advisable (nor possible) for directors to perfectly recreate history or even other works of fiction. Accuracy often gets in the way of an entertaining story, disrupting pace, etc.
@@MrTerrorist I said accurate to the book.
no I am sad that we could have Black Hawk Down in napoleonic era, instead we got a romantic comedy in costumes
This is giving Monty Python but with a $120 million budget 😂
Lol😂😂
Ah yes because you were there
In reality the eyewitnesses described a different scene: the deputies attempted to attack Napoleon, between him and them some grenadiers intervened who made the general reach the exit by making him pass over their heads, passing him from hand to hand, as the fans during concerts with rock stars throwing themselves from the stage. The minimum height to become a grenadier was, I think, 180cm, Napoleon was 165cm tall and then quite slim. Less spectacular scene than in the film, but that's how it is.
What do you mean “pass over their heads” and “passing him from hand to hand”
@@Ma1q444They lifted him up above their heads and passed him between each other
@@JohnCena-le1jjLike hot potato?
thats probably even more spectacular and hilarious. but nope. history is boring !!
@@delta5-126 they did crowd surfing
1:16 this film was so bad that this was funny
"Theyre trying to kill me"
"Theyre trying to kill him"
*hits someone at the door aggressively*
Its like its out of a sitcom
@@rainbowchap6973😭😭
With the tons of information available about this historical event and Ridley Scott comes around and fails miserably
My idol is Napoleon. I have studied Napoleon, I love his history. I don’t know what kind of mad man Ridley Scott is but Joaquin Phoenix portrayed him like a scumbag clown. Sure, after the coup, after, propaganda spread that Napoleon was stabbed or the 500 attempted to stab him, and one grenadier even got his sleeve ripped in the ordeal and received a pension. Napoleon is portrayed in this as a sad, desperate power h hungry nutter.
his father was a mudder
and his mother was a nutter
Careful, we got someone who was actually there when this happened in that chat.
Worst movie they could ever make on Napoleon
Joaquin had the look for this role but wasn't commanding enough with his persona.
Your idol is a deranged delusional tyrant who seized a powerful military from a lost and confused nation, waging total war ending in total defeat at the cost of millions of lives?! You must also idolize Hitler then.
The problem with this movie is that Ridley Scott tried to fit his entire adult life into a movie. Needed to show his rise to power as a general 1799-1804. THEN the second movie would show him emperor, 1804-1815.
Nah, better move would be 1799-1804, 1805-1812, then 1812-1815x alternatively. 1799-1804 Rise of Napoleon, 1805-1809 Rise of an Empire, 1809-1814 Fall of an Empire, 1815 Napoleons Return
Phoenix is one of the greatest actors alive. So the fact he sucks so bad in this film just shows what a terrible director Scott has become. You can give him hundreds of millions of dollars and the very best actors, and he'll still find a way to make it awful.
Phoenix is good, but I would question his breadth. What is Phoenix famous for?? Self abusing and loathing men who have tragic demises often. He played Johnny Cash, Joker, and Emperor Commodus, they're all similar archetypes of self-abusing men who are tragic in some sense. They should not have casted him, he doesn't play the part of a deliberately inspiring and rousing man, in control of his fate. Phoenix is more of the tragic loser who is thrust into path he never asked for.
@@maaz322I think it is more that you haven't seen enough of his work instead of the actor's "breadth". Check out Buffalo Soldiers or We Own the Night as two quick examples - if you want to see him play charismatic characters who aren't "tragic losers". He's really good at those too.
The problem is Ridley Scott. The same thing happened when he tried to make Robin Hood. He had some of the very best actors in the business and hundreds of millions - and still churned out mediocrity.
Ridley Scott should never be allowed to direct a history movie again
You shouldn't watch it then
I thought the same thing after Gladiator.
@@Levi-zr4dq I didn't
Why not?
0:48
It was worth the price of admission just to see those two seconds, I remember that taking everyone off guard in the theater lol
1:36 that little look he gave him when he said I’ll kill him like “What? I have to sell this, just go with it.”
I mean rather than making a speech if he just said "They tried to kill Napoleon." Those Guards would instantly go in there to bash those politicans heads open just because they 'think' about harming Napoleon :D
By the looks of the comments, a percentage of people dont like this scene (or the film.) But could we give Pheonix creadit when its due? For me its him falling down the stairs before instantly getting back up and running. Good job to him.
Those were stunt stairs. They go through a lot of training.
ooof that extra looking right into the lens and then shuffling back to make space for camera crew at 2:22
I'm so glad people are catching onto how much of a turd Ridley Scott has become. Every movie he makes now is just a hot take on history where every male character is either a coward or a complete bastard.
Ridley Scott literally depicts Napoleon as a brave leader who rides headfirst into battle, saber in hand. That is the opposite of portraying as a coward, especially when his enemies in the movie never lead their men in battle.
you dont know what you were talking about an he were tiny
And some people are catching on to what a total loser Napoleon was, despite European narratives of glory and triumph. Nothing more than a deranged delusional demagogue of a tyrant who seized a powerful military from a lost and confused nation, waging total war ending in total defeat at the cost of millions of lives.
He didn’t didn’t lead his men in charges like that, but he was still without doing that@@horsemann7354.
@@horsemann7354 His Napoleon is nothing like the real life man. Where is the charisma, the magnetic attraction? He instead appears more like a military autist, highly gifted for battle, but incapable of charming anyone. And then we have the battles, that happened nowhere near how they are depicted in the film.
I love the "They tried to kill me!" *points* "They tried to kill him."
They should’ve made the battle of Waterloo better like the movie of war and peace.
agree
My first problem with the movie is that they would try to squeeze Napoleon's whole eventful life in 2 to 3 hours. However, watching this short scene would show that there are other issues with the movie. You can hate Napoleon, but do not deny his genius and charisma. Here, he is made to look like an incompetent buffoon.
Love how Lucien, the president of the chamber, hit the deputies from his podium😂
Now that's a movie when the cameraman is being pushed around too😮😅🎉😊
Wasn't Murat the one who led the troops in?
0:50-I love that how he yells ‘Oh f-k!’ in English! 🤣🤣🤣
I love how the whole damn movie is English lol. They couldn't even use a French accent at least 🙄
@@waynedugger7697 Agreed! I mean, I didn’t expect Joaquin, Phoenix to learn French overnight, but Jesus Christ this movie was lazy!
@@KHoltzie lol I'm such a history buff.. and so disappointed in this
@@waynedugger7697 I know I feel like they could’ve pumped a little more authenticity into it, I think Scott just got lazy
@@waynedugger7697 i’m still going to go see it anyway, I don’t like that word of mouth thing, I have to see it with my own two eyes for a genuine inference
Not even kidding, when it became apparent that this movie wasn't as serious or historically accurate, I saw 2 people walk out. I enjoyed it though, it was super funny.
What is Napoleon doing in Britain?!?
Richard Sharpe would never allow this to happen
Not soldiering.
He only saw boney in the show
A man who loses the king’s colours loses the king’s friendship.
@@ConfusedRevolutionary I have a cousin at horse guards and I have friends at court.
Portrayed Napoleon like a wuss, horrible movie
2:06 when he is walking back up and backup has arrived. That’s powerful
As French. This anticipated movie is a huge letdown. Really out of context from the History Facts. I remember when I was in high school. We had a test subject about Napoleon Bonaparte and his conquest. I couldn’t fail it
As French. This anticipated movie is a huge letdown. Really out of context from the History Facts. I remember when I was in high school. We had a test subject about Napoleon Bonaparte and his conquest. I couldn’t fail it
I dont understand what you wanted him to do here.
@@Dukeybookey In this particular scene he’s about to make a "Coup" which means he was planning to overthrow the Republic Constitution.
According to History books, he made it but apparently not the case in this scene
bro idk why but i laughed at the part where he said ""they tried to kill me" and his brother says "they tried to kill him"
The thumbnail says it all.
Ridley Scott goofed-up on this one.
I gotta hand it to the guy- Napoleon was all intellect, he was a smart small MFer…every battle is won BEFORE its ever fought! ✊🏻🇫🇷
Napoleon wasn't actually small. He was actually an imposing figure.
5'6" isn't what i call small.. i was honestly thinking he was shorter than that to be honest.
@@KingsStreamWhat??? You don’t think 5’6 is small???
@@KHoltzietodays standards?? Nope
@@KingsStream We’re not talking about today though we’re talking about back then, at least I am
2:01 look closely. You can see the light swirching off. Indeed odd for the time. Didnt know bulb existes back then.😅
Woah, can't believe I didn't notice such a noticeable mistake
@@a_balloonThat's a glitch in the video, not the movie.
@@thepreacher7399 oooh that makes sense
It's like John Wayne playing Genghis Khan. Wasn't the best choice for that part. In Napoleon, I feel like I am watching Johnny Cash playing the part.
Joaquin Phoenix is a comedic actor genious
I’m gonna go see this one tomorrow-my only qualm with it is that I wish they’d a used more French actors and dialogue…it just doesn’t feel as authentic as it should with him speaking in English all the time! 🤷🏼♂️
Please don't waste your time and money. Worst possible movie made on Napoleon
That too Queens English yikes
@@1hasanraza i’ll take that into consideration, what did this get on rotten tomatoes???
don't mind the stupid negative reviews on social, it's actually a good movie (the best made on Napoleon so far). There are downsides of course (nothing on his immense heritage with regards to culture, politics, law, egyptology etc. nothing on the campaigns of Italy and Spain either, and the portrayal of his relationship with Josephine is a bit awkward), but the 4 battle scenes are great, so are the settings and the costumes) and it depicts a more human Napoleon than any other film. Can't wait for the director's cut version on apple +
@@townsley2 I know, I hear what you’re saying and I totally agree, I’m not really one for that word of mouth shit, I’d rather go see the film myself and draw my own inferences!
cant wait to get this on 4k bluray........... a masterpiece.....!!!!!
protect the VIP mode be like
Lord Larys helped Napoleon stage his coup d'Etat!
History Buffs (UA-cam channel) is going to tear Ridley Scott a new one 😂😂😂
You mean they should tear into the historians who taught you about Napoleon and his "conquests" and not his total defeat. They taught you wrong, because they did not teach you about all the massive disasters and all the wars that Napoleon lost as enemy troops marching down the streets of Paris, France under military occupation, a once juggernaut French military in shambles, a generation's worth of French boys lying in mass graves, France losing territory, France forced to pay massive war reparations, France forced to accept the hated Bourbon Monarchy, as Napoleon dies a broken defeated man on a forsaken island. Who should get torn a new one?
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators still Ridley. He in fact told historians to "get a life"
@@mahaliadoesitbest2294 Just ignore the pathetic military results and call it a triumph, too cowardly to face an ugly truth.
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators yeah....I'll send you the link when History Buffs uploads the recap. Ridley might retire afterwards lol
@@mahaliadoesitbest2294 The self denial is way too personal. I mean are you still grieving that your great great great great great French grandfather got hacked to pieces by Spanish guerrillas or something? Only to have France lose the Peninsular War, and the Napoleonic Wars overall as enemy troops march down the streets of Paris. Is that what you do not have the courage to yet admit, that so many French boys died horrible deaths in total defeat? So why don't you justify all the French death and suffering by telling yourself how Napoleon improved the Civil Code for the world, especially the reinstating slavery and the slave trade in his laws, that was certainly noble and enlightening.
Bro’s like oh F*ck when falling down
I have to go see this movie-I want to look down and see Josephine’s surprise! 😏😏😏
At 2:02 the window in the center of the shot suddenly goes dark, as if an electrical light is turning off. Anyone know what's going on there?
That's just a video artefact ig
Такой эпизод действительно произошëл с Наполеоном Бонапартом в реальности. Ридли Скотт в данной сцене ПОЛЬСТИЛ Наполеону. Если герой Хоакина Феникса вырвался из толпы и не дал себя разорвать на куски, то настоящий Наполеон Бонапарт оказался в заложниках у совета пятисот и чуть было не погиб, еслиб не поддержка военных откликнувшишся на зов его брата.
"Shall we vote". 😉
I always thought "Napoleon was a Joker", but Now I KNOW "Napoleon is the JOKER" 🤣🤣🤣🤣
If I was the president I'd send a commando to take care of Ridley Scott.
I will say, the set design, outfits, and acting was really great in this movie.
This whole scene looks like something Horrible Histories would do for one of their news skits
Say what you want about him, Napolean saved the ancient antigies of eqypt from being destoryed. the rosette stone was found because he wanted to perserve the history of egypt
By losing the best of the French Navy in a meaningless invasion what was the first of multiple military disasters for Napoleon, you forgot to mention that part. Because people like you want to ignore the disaster and try to attribute something positive, like a coward who can't face an ugly truth.
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators Napoleon was a General and not an Admiral. The loss of the fleet at the battle of the Nile is a Navel loss and is the fault of the Admiral in charge, same as Trafalgar.
The same as you can't blame the King or a us president for a loss if the commander on the ground or at sea is the one directing the battle.
@@imperatorsteve Commenter forgot to mention the whole, DISASTER of a DEFEAT part, which is what Egypt was for Napoleon. Napoleon lost the best of the French navy in failed invasion, as Napoleon abandoned his army when things were going terrible, went back to France, pretended that he had conquered Egypt to the French public when Egypt was not subdued, and then manipulatively blamed Kleber for Napoleon's mess and ultimate French defeat in Egypt. Commenter forgot to mention that part, that Napoleon failed to control the area longterm and gave Napoleon enormous undue credit for saving ancient Egyptian history. Because we all know what a great legal scholar and building inspector that Napoleon was, as well as a great Ancient Egyptian Historian.
@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators you missed the bit that had the French navy been victorious then the French troops could count on resupply in a hostile region while the French pacified the locals.
Without the fleet there was no chance of resupply or reinforcement.
Yes it became a great propaganda point for Napoleon when he abandoned the dieing army, but it doesn't change the fact that had the fleet admiral done their job and won the battle of the Nile things could have turned out differently
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictatorsImagine having such a SAD and BORING life you make an entire burner account to dickride a shitty director for a shitty movie. It's not about whether or not Napoleon was a good person or a good commander it's about HISTORICAL INACCURACIES.
I think the movie kind of captures the spirit of the man and doesn’t look as bad as people say from the clips… I wouldn’t be surprised if it was bad.
i enjoyed the movie tbf
same@@mykosumo9478
The clips are fine, but the movie in its whole was just not good
i like the fact where he had like 50 old guard on stand by at the door
It's a comedy. I picked up on that in the beginning, and I loved it. Excellent movie.
He is no Rod Steiger!
Few are.
I liked Napoleon, sure it was a little much with the sex and love interest and yes the battle scenes were at most subpar, but I think in the end it was a good movie if you see past all the inaccuracies, I mean I do enjoy a good movie and want them to be as historically accurate as possible. I view this as I view many movies, would I watch the entire thing from start to finish after seeing it in the movie theater? No, I wouldn't, but would I watch the scenes of battles on UA-cam? Yes, I will.
Great. Now we know the scope of Scott's achievement when it's the battle scenes that we care about.
2:00 where did that light come from?
the old guard were badass
Napoleon's brother is a G
When the british make a movie about the french Emperor that kicked their ass for more than 20 years straight all by himself.
That makes no sense because the Brits won in the end xD and before you mention it yes i know about the coalition. But it was still Wellington who won waterloo.
@@reposter6434 It was Blucher who won Waterloo, Wellington had already lost. If you don't believe me, just go see for yourself, I'm getting tired of people that say ''ahah france bad, england won''
@@gggo1789 He hadn't already lost what do you mean xD The French couldn't take the farms on the flanks, but after a long battle, they managed to take the centre farm which allowed them to push up their artillery. But by that point, the Prussians managed to flank around the French. In a desperate attempt, Napoleon tried to break through the British lines but miserably failed losing all of his elite units to the British musket fire. Now explain how he already lost? I have done the courtesy of linking a video. Hopefully, this will help you better understand ;) ua-cam.com/video/nDZGL1xsqzs/v-deo.html
@@reposter6434 Epic History TV already explained that this is an old and inaccurate video. After the failed (and uncommanded) charge of Marshal Ney, Napoleon was back to the battlefield after suffering a serious stomach ache, witnessing most if not his entire cavalry scattered and wounded, almost completely out of combat. After losing La Haye Sainte to the french, Wellington's army and morale were decreasing and decreasing from the losses (losses that are not mentioned in this video because as the channel said, it's inaccurate). Seeing an opportunity to march in Brussel, Napoleon sent in his Vieille Garde to crush and tear down the rest of the (mostly) routed british infantrymen. By this time, Wellington had written in his Memoirs of the battle that he had considered it a defeat. Fortunately for him, Marshal Blucher's troops arrived at his left flank, by then Napoleon's troops were already sent and he wasn't able to stop them from advancing. The Vieille Garde, not being informed of the prussians' arrival and fearing an encirclement, went in a complete rout and retreated, suffering extremely heavy casualties. You know the rest I believe, btw try not to use the ''xD'' emoji on these types of serious debates, it doesn't really serve any purpose except trigger me.
@@gggo1789 Even if the video is slightly inaccurate without Wellington and his army the Prussians wouldn't of won the battle? So how can you say it was a Prussian victory and not a British victory? If anything they were both victorious as without the two armies Napoleon would have won. My problem isn't the fact the Prussians helped alot, my problem is you trying to give credit to one man that's the problem and trying to justify the involvement of the Prussians as a Prussian only victory. If the "xD" offends you then my apologies. I used it because I think it's funny how you can't accept that it was both a Prussian and British victory. Anyways Wellington held his ground in the hopes that the Prussians would get to flank on time. It wasn't blind luck, it was all planned.
I see Jocker cosplaying...😢
frankly I really liked this film, I know people gripe about the accuracy, but if anything to me it made napoleon feel more human.
Frankly, there are much better movies about Napoleon's life (for example: 2002 with Christian Clavier)
This honestly wouldn't be out of place in a Monty Python sketch...
Average high school student government be like
Least corrupt student government:
Something that nobody should do is joke about the French military, just because of one big defeat all of their major victories are forgotten
I actually saw the movie and I was surprised that in the scenes of the Battle Of Waterloo they didn't include the multiple attacks on the farmhouse even though it was one of the most important parts of the battle I hope that in the the extended edition (directors cut) they have it in
As far as I can tell this is the only remotely accurate part of the film and that’s not saying much because it only gets a few things right. Napoleon really was at first rejected by the delegates and his brother really did point a dagger at him to motivate the hostile takeover. Obviously it wasn’t as satirical as it was here and obviously the soldiers didn’t just march in and form a a firing squad immediately but it was the only part of the film that made me go “at least they got that right somewhat”.
How did we go from the Duellists to this?
Scotts work on the Duellists gave me such high hopes for Napolean.
Shame.
Ridley Scott is just old. Thats all
He got woke and old@@adamszabo2874
this scene is fantastic. I have rarely seen such a beautifull scene. Ridley is great. Joachim superb.
Old guard looking good
The fact that this movie is in Elglish language , is hilarious
It wouldn't have gotten much international attention if it was filmed in French
im not french and even i feel offended by this movie.
General Hux sounding ahh dude
Reminded me of Caesar's assassination.
I don't care what anyone says I love this movie and I will never ever hate this movie.
Your lonely pal.
terrible movie in lots of ways ..i feel sorry for joachim pheonix as he is a great actor ..but ridley scott came out himself and said even though the movie isnot accurate it,s still just a movie ..duuurgh WHAT ? he must think people are stupid ..when it is an historic movie ,,these days people would like to see accuracy not just thrown together piffle ..ridley scotts attitude towards the audience prompts me to give a lowly 3/10 film is crap most battle scenes shot in the dark and total lack of respect for others by scott time for him to retire 👎
The fact that the movie has alot of Old Guards, Its hilarous
Amazing movie
He was corsican, not french i believe
Yes, he was Corsican Italian.
Corsica was a part of France, and even though he was raised as a Corsican, he choose to be French. What you choose to be is worth more than what you were.
Garbage movie. Portrayed one of the greatest military generals as some incompetent turd who just achieved everything by luck.
Total garbage.
That joker fall and run lel
So many people commenting without really knowing or caring to understand the history. It’s fair because you can’t expect the ordinary joe to care, I’m sure they just came to see good movie, which objectively in my opinion it is not history aside.
Hate this movie with my heart
Blud did most likey not even watch the movie anyways shut up
Josephloera, it seems that you didnt watch this shit movie.
It was a great film,people just listen to what the media says without watching the film themselves
Archiburges, this time the Media say the truth. It is a Shit movie. Nearly everything in this film was wrong. Even the Soundtrack was Shit. Ridley Scott didnt give a f... for a good Napoleon movie, He is laughing about positiv comments.
The way it was written an the timeline is utter garbage but it is still nice to look at cinema wise an the battle scenes.
Trailer looks badass , but the movie was horrible and made him look week.
This film is a new "fury", despite having a bad and completely inaccurate story, it is an incredible cinematographic work
The squid thing shows up and everything gets balanced when it's not
This movie was such overrated garbage. Seems like an incoherent collage hacked together by an art student the night before the project is due.
As French. Couldn’t agree more. This is so out of context. They screwed it up
Now I’m interest on Duke of Wellington journey through Europe
Shut the fuck up its a good movie if your so pissed off how about you watch 1970 waterloo dumb bitch i know half of the movie is napoloen fucking his wife but bro you don't gotta be angry
This movie was supposed to be a nutshell of napoleon. I don't get why people don't understand that.
@@lizardo667 "This movie was supposed to be a nutshell of napoleon."
Well, if it was supposed to be that, it failed, even at that very limited objective. Disastrously so. Are you seriously defending this pile of dogshit of a movie?!
@@antred11 Yeah i am, cause its my opinion. I liked the movie. So stop being a whiny putz and allow me to express my opinion of a movie that i liked.
Napoleon is an excellent movie. Ridley Scott did a great job!
Eat my ass
it is indeed !
Only 2 explanations: You're ironical or you're british
@@theimmortalgrenadier3851 It has nothing to do with identity politics, not everyone is as biased as you are.
@@RidleyScottOwnsFailedDictators Identity politics? Not enough IQ to get my comment. Brits have a huge rivalry against french so if he likes the film it's probably coz it portrayed Napoleon like some lunatic, incompetent, lucky and uncharismatic dwarf. Lol you probably went to watch Barbie and the New peter pan film and consider them to be the greatest films in the last dozen of years. Give me a break
No mentally sane person with any common sense and historical knowledge enjoyed this mess of a pathetic film
Can i just say. As an English person. I am fully aware this film does miss a lot of campaigns napoleon had, battles.. important battles missed and other rather important details missed.
This is an English made film. While it does miss a lot of key points, it is a fictional film. And it does a good job of being accurate.. mostly.
Napoleon was a dictator. Yes. But i dont think anyone could dispute his cunning mind, he was also decent at war strategies. He propelled his country into a major power. Pissed of us English (and lets be honest thats war matters the most) and grabbed the attention of half the world. Love or hate him. The man has legendary accolades
McCron should bar Ridley Scott and Phoenix from going back to France lol
this movie sucks, it's just british propaganda about Napoleon
Nah it's not
@@sleem-pc9kzyes it is
For the people complaining about historical accuracy: This is not a documentary. Its a Hollywood film.
Bro dont act as if these movies dont have an impact on the memory of history. Hollywood is a propaganda agency for what US dummies want to hear
... about a historical figure.
@@VRichardsn theres no such thing as a "historically accurate" Hollywood film. Everyone should know that by now.
@@TWagnusThere are lots of Hollywood movies that are historically accurate. There's a difference in taking some liberties for entertainment purposes and completely just making up whatever tf you want
@@shekelman2265 fair
Ridley Scot: the cocktail of demise on historical accuracy
Omfg I’m sorry but the way he tilted his head and sword when “threatening” to kill his brother was honestly hilarious 😂😂
0/10, 0/20 !
Esse golpe de 18 Blumario 1799 foi epico. Era Napoleao, Roger ducos,Saiers..
this just shows the tension between englishmen and frenchmen
Ist das bei 2:01 ein belichtungsfehler?
I thought there was going to be more action in the film, I didn’t pay to be back in school and watch a history lesson with some action