Such a wild event. If it was in a work of fiction, no one would believe it could happen. He just comes back and says “yeah, I’m in charge again” and everyone just agrees lol.
Funny thing: it IS a work of fiction. In reality, things didn't happen like that at all. Starting his return, Bonaparte had won over many soldiers with a simple tool: money. Then, at Laffrey, he had around 1200 peasants in front of him; if the opposing soldiers started to shoot, the peasants would take the bullets, not Bonaparte.
@@MelerionTheFirst It wasn't so much charisma, as much as everyone then serving the obviously castrated bourbon restoration was shitting themselves at the idea of a mass revolution in favour of napoleon by the populace, who loved him for his land and legal reforms (which where being overturned by the king). They weighed their options and probably thought serving in his inner circle was a much better option to their head on a pike from an angry populace. They where also keenly aware that the common solider loved Napoleon for again, his victories, military reforms (Napoleonic France was one of the first armies to introduce a meritocracy in their officer class) and again his land reforms which favored veterans. It definitely was charisma in terms of how he projected his public image, but I think by this point privately many in his inner circle had dubious loyalties to say the least, with the possible exception of Ney, and where their more to save their own power and social position than out of any personal loyalty to Napoleon.
Early in his career, right after a victory, a French soldier stated, “He’s not like the other Generals, he’s covered in mud and blood!” This was after Napoleon had jumped in to replace a man shot through the eye that was aiming and loading a cannon. He continued to shout orders while operating the cannon. That’s a leader
I knew a Greek man we used to work together, his name was Napoleon. His father's, grandfather's, grand grand father's and so on until the generation back in centuries where his ancestor happened to be a proud soldier of Napoleon Bonaparte and ever since they were naming their boys Napoleon. Has to be some devotion and admiration towards the man.
Les Bonaparte étaient des "collabos" et étaient très mal vus en Corse. (ils collaboraient avec les Français à qui Gênes avait vendu la Corse). Les Français avaient envoyé 30 000 hommes sur l'île afin de contraindre les Corses à payer leurs impôts...
It was a Ridley Scott movie, not a Joaquin Phoenix movie. Joaquin is an amazing actor, and did a good job with what he was presented. But whatever it was that he was presented with, it wasn’t Napoleon.
One of the best films in history. This film by Sergei Bondarchuk is still considered in Hollywood as a kind of illustrated manual on how to shoot a truly epic and lively movie with huge masses of people. However, today they don’t know how to shoot like that - everything is replaced with effects, doll-like pop modern faces and a green screen. The era of mediocrity.
Vous avez bien raison. Le film tout récent réalisé par Ridley Scott avec Joaquin Phoenix dans le rôle de l'Empereur n'est vraiment pas à la hauteur de celui de Sergei Bondarchuk.
Dude had an entire era named after him. I saw his portrait in a nightclub in Bangkok. I'm from India and even in our history, Hyder Ali of Mysore kingdom used to maintain contact with Napoleon Bonaparte to coordinate against the English. His effect on the world was mind blowing. I have read a biography of his a long time ago but I don't remember this scene. I wish someone like Conn Iggulden would cover Napoleon the way he covered Genghis or Caeser.
Simon Scarrow did a very good book series on Napoleon and The Duke of Wellington. They are well worth a read. I moved on to them after I read Conn Igguldens books which are fantastic too.
This scene is from his return out of exile to Elba. Where the reinstated monarchy send a small army to intercept him, they ended up joining him instead.
A lot of film enthusiasts lament the fact that Kubrick never made his Napoleon film. I always direct people to this movie, an outstanding achievement that has stood the test of time, like the man himself.
@@LeeRenthlei Waterloo was no comeback. St. Helena was no comeback. I suppose his body being brought back to Paris and placed in a beautiful cherry wood coffin in Invalides is a type of comeback. While I certainly enjoy French history and such riveting Napoleon bios as that of Schom, et al, Napoleon's was a wasted life that wasted millions of other lives. His legacy left some accomplishments for the French people but was not done peaceably. You can say he led the last great French army. After all, France has not won a "Super Bowl" since. LOL.
It is a wonderful movie scene, but not fully accurate. It summarizes the encounter close to Laffrey, where a Battalion sent to arrest Napoleon turned to his side after he addressed them, and the later event at Auxerre, where Marshall Ney arranged to meet Napoleon for the same purpose. No sword was surrender or returned.
Yes, and remember that THAT commander is who gave the order to SHOOT Napoleon. Napoleon had a Jesus-like capacity to forgive (because he just wanted to move on and have a stronger army, so he forgave that man for the sake of a stronger & unified army, when he could have easily ordered him executed for doing what HE tried to do to HIM). WOW. WHATTA MAN INDEED.
Napoleon Bonaparte is one of the only great men in history to exist in a vaccum, that is to say without him nobody else would have led France to imperium as he did. Napoleon single handedly altered the tajectory of human history without anyone else who could have filled that role
He was also not the son of the nobility or from a Wealthy family he was literally a random dude that changed the world forever, but he was also mounted on the powerful spirit of the french revolution
@@StraussBR He was son of nobility, but a very poor (for a nobility) noble family It took most of the family finances to send him to france in a military school, feat which was not exactly possible for most of the third estate While I agree he wasn't exactly much before his rise, he still had some luck at birth. And for sure, he went far above what anyone else would've thought possible from his birth.
As a Pole (someone Polish, from Poland) I must say we kind of worship him, do we? I mean, he litterally established the Duchy of Warsaw and after the wars ended there was this thing called the "Napoleonic Spirit" where Poles living in Prussia Russia and Austria thought Napoleon was some sort of eldritch angel sent by the catholic God to grant Poland independence and to curse the partitioners. He also designed our flag which I think is pretty cool.
@@GolovanJot Client state is better than annexation to be honest He also kind of allowed us to do our thing as long as we sent atleast 10 thousand men every year to support his empire so
Le Pen la moitié si c'est la fille seulement, le reste... c'est tout le regiment qui ouvre le feu tellement leur conviction patriotique c'est du papier maché par le fion
@@rylodinson6100 ouais, parce que Marine Le Pen c'est une femme justement. L'autre moitié ils l'enverrons aux cuisines réglementaires.... (ça fait sexiste, mais c'est de l'époque)
So are you telling me that the man that almost subjugated a whole continent was a charismatic and military genius and not a weirdo like the man in Ridley Scott's movie? Impressive.
Truly, who could have imagined this? There's a quote that such people do not comprehend. "It is more honorable to be raised to a throne than to be born to one. Fortune bestows the one, merit obtains the other." And such men as rise to become emperors do not do so by random chance alone. That movie is a monstrosity. Looking back on history, there are all sorts of incredible figures - El Cid, Saladin, Napoleon, Alexander etc. who are all complex and interesting people. The Ridley Scott's of the world would like to present all of them as if they were just a panoply of awkward invalids to make themselves feel better. It's sad.
Its been about a decade but if memory serves correct...... in that scene the mounted man was sent to kill or capture. Steely eyed Napolean called on his troop's faith in France and in him. Once the lad feinted at the thought of shooting his hero, all of the others rushed leave the mounted general's side. Of course, they knew each other and had great respect for each other. At this moment Bonaparte knew he needed Generals and by sparing this one's life in glorious manor, he knew he had his second
@Bender B. Rodrigues Well, we can't completely blame Ney. Napoleon was very absent that day and Ney was only the bravest of the brave, not the smartest of the smart. On the other side Wellington was partout. Always present and showing himself when needed. That contrast in leadership on that day made a lot of difference. And the arrival of the Germans too. Besides, very few of the Corsican's commanders were executed after the 100 days. Ney was. (edit) During his trial, his lawyer tried to save him by declaring that he was now Prussian (his hometown had become German at the time) but Ney interrupted him by saying: "Je suis Français et je resterais Français!" A truly brave man.
@@wellesmorgado4797 If I were to offer my own view of the situation, it seems as though Napoleon had given up after the harsh rains during the night of 17th June 1815 before the grand Battle of Waterloo. When on the 16th Michel Ney failed to stop Wellington's forces from regrouping at Qatre Bras, I recall reading in Bernard Cornwell's historical book Waterloo that Napoleon lost his temper at the failure to overrun the coalition and told Ney, "With this, you've lost France!"
@@theaerotrooper Yes, it was probably a very big strategical blunder failing to prevent the regrouping. But it also might be, in part, a blame deflecting technique. During the main battle nothing was really decided & the old Napoleon might have snatched victory from the jaws of defeat. But that old Napoleon was nowhere to be found...
Easily the most dramatic moment of the journey came the following day a few hundred yards south of the town of Laffrey, where Napoleon encountered a battalion of the 5th Line in a narrow area between two wooded hills on what is today called La Prairie de la Rencontre. According to Bonapartist legend, Napoleon, standing before them well within musket range, with only his far smaller number of Imperial Guardsmen protecting him, threw back his iconic grey overcoat and pointed to his breast, asking if they wanted to fire on their Emperor. In testament to the continuing power of his charisma, the troops threw down their muskets and mobbed him.118 Napoleon had previously been informed by two officers of the pro-Bonapartist attitudes of the demi-brigade, but a single shot from a royalist officer could have brought about a very different outcome. Savary, who wasn’t present, told a slightly less heroic version, in which Napoleon’s conversational style and habit of question-asking saved the day. The Emperor approached; the battalion kept a profound silence. The officer who was in command ordered them to aim their muskets: he was obeyed; if he had ordered Fire we cannot say what would have happened. The Emperor didn’t give him time: he talked to the soldiers and asked them as usual: ‘Well! How are you doing in the 5th?’ The soldiers answered ‘Very well, Sire.’ Then the Emperor said: ‘I’ve come back to see you; do some of you want to kill me?’ The soldiers shouted ‘Oh! That, no!’ Then the Emperor reviewed them as usual and thus took possession of the 5th Regiment. The head of the battalion looked unhappy.119 When Napoleon himself told the story he said he had adopted a jovial, old-comrade attitude towards the troops: ‘I went forward and held out my hand to a soldier, saying, “What, you old rascal, were you about to fire on your Emperor?” “Look here,” he answered, showing me that his musket was not loaded.’120 He also put the success down to having his veterans with him: ‘It was the bearskin helmets of my Guards which did the business. They called to memory my glorious days.’121 Whether Napoleon had been declamatory or conversational at that tense moment, he showed great nerve. Laffrey also represented a watershed, because for the first time regular soldiers, rather than peasants or National Guardsmen, had come over to his side. (Napoleon by Andrew Roberts)
c'est dommage qu'il soit allé à la guerre en Russie. répété le sort de nombreux dirigeants d'Europe, qui ont vu leur fin sans gloire dans les étendues de la Russie
Even here in the Philippines,which is geographically far from Europe and France.Napoleon is still influential name we knew about French history..what a great man.Vive l'empereur or in Philippine words "Mabuhay ang Emperador!"
Not how it really went down. But what a great moment in history. France. Napoleon the year the era. Perfection. In human events. I'm a marine I would of followed him blindly. He was a true leader of men s hearts. A man's man.
@@no-one9484 and look at our "smart" world now where nobody follows anyone. Stuck in cocoons on our phones, ranting about we are so individualistic, as our societies degrade around us.
Dans cette scène tout le charisme d'un vrai leader qui ne se cache pas derrière ces soldats. Napoléon n'a jamais eu peur de la mort ni de montrer l'exemple.
@@enguerranddupaty90 Laisse, il fait parti des personnes qui ne connaissent rien à l'Histoire avec un grand "H", et qui sont incapables de prendre du recul sur leur présent. Difficile à raisonner, perds pas ton temps. Vive l'Empereur !
"The ideas that underpin our modern world-meritocracy, equality before the law, property rights, religious toleration, modern secular education, sound finances, and so on-were championed, consolidated, codified and geographically extended by Napoleon. To them he added a rational and efficient local administration, an end to rural banditry, the encouragement of science and the arts, the abolition of feudalism and the greatest codification of laws since the fall of the Roman Empire. " -Andrew Roberts, British historian.
@@WolverineXOXO Napoleon was a progressive. He was opposed to the conservative politics of his time. All of the reforms mentioned in the above comment were directly opposed by the conservative and traditionalist rulers of his time. Your comment is fairly ironic, in that you are taking the side of conservatism and traditionalism, just as Napoleon’s opponents did.
@@broksholk4771 Napoleon came about because the situation needed a Napoleon. The French Revolution had disgressed into tyrannical murder. Such does not represent Conservatism.
Eine der großartigsten Szenen aus diesem beeindruckenden Spielfilm, auch phantastisch gut gespielt. Das einmalige CHARISMA von Napoleon I. wird hier gut dokumentiert. Sein nie abreißender Kontakt zum "einfachen Soldaten", vermochte die hohe Kampfmoral seiner Truppen kaum erschüttern. Die Bedeutung des menschlichen Willens - gerade im Krieg - wird hier sichtbar!
napoleon war wohl eigentlich ein guter Kerl und die meisten normalen Menschen mochten ihn.. Nur eben der Adel, der mochte ihn nicht!! wahrscheinlich wohl eben deswegen!
@@Knebebelmeyer ER paßte eben nicht in das "alte System" - und schuf sich daher ein neues ! Als "Kind der Revolution" bekam NAPOLEON dafür unerwartete Machtmittel ausgehändigt.
@@kaiguleikoff7742 Eigentlich brachte er Ordnung und Richtung zu einer Revolution die den Verstand verloren hatte. Seine Rolle war anscheinend die Revolution zu verbreiten und die Ancien Regime schwere Schaden hinzuzufügen.
@@bpeper1365 NAPOLEON rettete die Französische Revolution vor dem Untergang - durch Einführung seiner Autokratie. Dadurch trug ER dazu bei, die bürgerlichen Ideen der Revolution über ganz Europa zu verbreiten - mit der Kaiserkrone auf dem Haupt. Die ganze Widersprüchlichkeit von Geschichtsentwicklung kann an NAPOLEON gut erklärt werden.
Not shown in this scene, the wheelbarrow Napoleon used to transport his enormous ballsack. Stood in front of hundreds of men all pointing their guns at him, he opened his coat and told them to go ahead and kill him if they wanted to. This happened more than once with army after army sent to arrest him joining his cause.
Essa cena aconteceu exatamente assim. Luís XVIII cometeu a burrice de mandar o Exército Francês capturar/matar Napoleão que retornava do primeiro exílio, justamente o grupo armado que mais adorava o antigo imperador. E assim ele entrou sem resistência em Paris e iniciou o Governo dos Cem Dias, tentando um acordo com as potências europeias para reconhecer a restauração do Império. Mas os líderes do Velho Continente formaram a aliança que derrubou definitivamente Napoleão em Waterloo, após vários confrontos menores.
Mark my words: they are going to make Joaquin Phoenix appear meek and cuck the shit out of him in the modern movie. The appetite of the culture war cannot be satiated it would seem
@@styxrakash4639 well no - which culture war are you talking about? there is nothing woke or color in this movie. Are you sad there is no angle for a culture war?
@@styxrakash4639 This historical drama's already badly inaccurate. Napoleon never led a single cavalry charge in his life- and he never fired on the Pyramids. That- in a film made by Ridley Scott, of all people- is a stunner. Any hope for a quality film work on Napoleon resides with Steven Spielberg- who's currently at work on a mini- series on the Emperor.
@@timl7935 MACRON un chef ??? 😂😂😂manipulé pour organiser la destruction du pays sous toutes ses formes J’ai le champagne 🥂 au frais dès fois qu’il lui arriverait une bricole .......
@@barbt.9211 Everyone has his own favorite I suppose. For variety of reasons. Militarily Napoleon was good, but there were some equally good if not better. My personal best is Jan Zizka. Czech general who never lost a battle, always fought against superior forces, both in numbers and equipment, and was winning battles even when he got blind as result of the wounds.
@@deepakarya5102 you got it wrong. Napolean marched in to Moscow with 500000 soliders 7 months later he returned to France with 35 soliders, some historians say it was 250 soliders.
@@abeninan4017 i know that..i am not saying Russia wasn't his blunder....his military tactics were still out of this world..even Hannibal got defeated, but still wasn't he genius ?
100 days were interesting and added to the legend of Napoleon, how he returned and took the hearts of the entire army once again. But the ending was inglorious, at Waterloo and then dying like some refugdeee at St Helen. I wonder how well he was guarded, and why nobody offered to rescue him. Some of the American privateers for example, we know that the US fought against the Brits also. Napoleons return for 100 days was a great gamble but not a dumbass move. He sensed the coalition falling apart. Emperor Alexander of Russia was having none of his alkies bs
A british captain called Thomas Cochrane tried to pick him up and take him to south america to be emporer, but napoleon was already too ill when cochrane got to saint helena. again, you wouldnt beleive it if it was fiction.h
I read that there were rumors that some in the coalition wanted to relocate him from Elba to somewhere more remote like St Helena. It may have also motivated Napoleon to try to regain power.
It's funny how in every movie he is portrayed as short when we know he was average for the time at 1.65 m tall. The French metric system said 1.55 m, people misunderstood, and even after it was confirmed as a mistake it was too late! They still teach it wrong in school today! This world is full of funny mistakes like that...
Not just that, his Imperial Guard was always beside him which consisted of men who at minimum were 6'4 (this was an actual requirement) which made him kinda small looking in comparison
I mean, La Grande Armée was actually faster than most armies at the time due to the corps system and a decent organization, so they were able to move across the continent faster than most enemies (which played into Bonaparte's strategy of decisive battles)
Ну это верно! Наполеон мог пошутить со смертью, отваги ему хватало! И на Аркольском мосту со знаменем в руках под картечным огнем, и в Яффе, когда с больными чумой солдатами здоровался за руку! Великий был человек!
@Miguel Lopez Nieto read your own nome bro. Where do you think “Miguel” and “Lopez” came from? That “indigean language” is Portuguese, a latim language, same origin as your name
@@JediMik я могу назвать только пару имён которые могут сравниться с этим весёлым Корсиканцем, к примеру Ленин, Сталин, Жуков (если считать только военные заслуги), так же я бы кинул сюда ещё Петра первого, Суворова и Кутузова, но последние два отличились только как хорошие военные.
Давайте поклонимся режиссёру Сергею Бондарчуку за создание этого шедевра. В то время никто не мог снимать батальные сцены как он. Никто не мог выразить актёром такие эмоции как он. Никто не был так популярен в этой ипостаси как он. Слава памяти великого советского режиссёра!
@@nous93 Hitler Français. Carrément. Et que pensez-vous donc de la République, qui pour s'installer au pouvoir aura tué plusieurs millions de Français ? (les Vendéens sont loin d'être les seuls) Napoléon n'a déclaré la guerre a aucun Etat Européen. Mais sans doute aurait-il fallut qu'il laisse la France aux Coalisés pour que votre Morale puisse y trouver son compte ?
Величайший европейский лидер всех времён! Современные политики европы просто меркнут по сравнению с Наполеоном. Русский император Александр 3 неистово завидовал Наполеону, возможно это и стало причиной войны 1812 года. Которая много где в России освещается неполно и многие факты умалчиваются. Наполеон легендарная личность. Желаю Франции нового Бонапарта.
Александр III? Его зависть стала причиной войны 1812 года? Вы что-то путаете. Вам, вероятно, говорили о зависти Александра I. Не от большого ума говорили.
@@ВладимирВладимирович-т3ж клим ссаныч с профессором-расчленителем соколовым большим умом никогда не отличались, однако в уши нагадили многим интернет-пользователям
@@sid_asid То есть война началась все-таки из-за зависти? Экономика и политика тут ни при чем, только зависть? Хочу услышать мнение эксперта с мировым именем.
One of the best films ever made. Someone uploaded it on UA-cam, and I love how Ney throws the sabre on the ground and the Old Guard member just hands it to Napoleon. Funny to me, I don’t know why
Franchement ce serait sympa une série a gros budget sur les épopée de la vie de Napoléon. Mais manque de budget (voir les réalisations française ces dernières années) et pression idéologique d'une partie de la gauche cela n'aboutira jamais. Bien dommage mais ce film était bien, la première fois que je l'avais vu malheureusement, comme tous les film il a pu montré en long et en large, toutes les Batailles de Napoléon. Faut que la France immite les Turcs comme avec la série du siècle magnifique.
@@arthi4022 Ouais mais j'ai peur du délire woke US, comme mettre des minorités. Je suis pas contre la diversité mais sur un film série qui se repose sur des plans historique où il n'y avait pas de multi culturalisme contexte de l'époque oblige, c'est juste pas possible autant des films/series de divertissement je m'en fous bien que dommage ( Ex The witcher) mais sur Napoléon ça passe pas ce serait offensant insultant réécriture de l'histoire. Et cela s'applique pour presque toutes les périodes de l'histoire, où il n'y a plus de débat.
@@le_draffar5370 “Un film série qui se repose sur des plans historique (sic) où il n'y avait pas de multi culturalisme“... la France etait deja un empire transcontinental et donc multiculturel a l epoque.
Ça me fait rire tous ces gens qui disent vive l'empereur. Aujourd'hui les français sont tous égoïste en ne pensant qu'à eux . C'est toujours "ma liberté , mes droits ...." mais bizarrement j'entend jamais " pour mon pays " Franchement j'aimerai bien que demain que il y ait une vrai guerre que la conscription soit relancé pour voir le nombre réel de volontaire prêt à mourir à pour la France. Perso je suis sur que la très très grande majorité de français aujourd'hui refuseront de se battre et iront faire leur sport favori , manifesté dans la rue pour dire qui veulent pas se battre parce qu'ils ont piscine ou le bac blanc à bosser 😂😂
L'une des plus grosses erreurs de Napoléon a été d'envahir l'Espagne. Ça a été un véritable bourbier sans fin où il a épuisé des ressources militaires en vain. Sinon ça reste le plus grand virtuose des tactiques et stratégies militaires de son temps.
"Sinon ça reste le plus grand virtuose des tactiques et stratégies militaires de son temps" Non. ça n'était pas un grand stratège (au sens de Grande Stratégie). Sinon il n'aurait pas finit à Sainte Hélène. Bismarck était un grand stratège, par exemple. Les grands stratèges meurent dans leur lit, après avoir bâti et consolidé un état ou un empire. Et ce n'était pas toujours un très bon tacticien, beaucoup de ses victoires auraient pu très mal se terminer et n'ont connu une issue heureuse que grâce à des gros coups de chance ( Marengo par exemple, qui sans l'arrivée in extremis de Desaix pour lui sauver la mise aurait tourné à la déroute). Certains de ses officiers étaient eux de très grands tacticiens, comme Davout (sans Davout, à Austerlitz les choses auraient pu très mal se terminer). Et beaucoup des ses batailles étaient de sanglants match nuls, remportés grâce à ses gros bataillons et la qualité de l'outil militaire dont il disposait (Eylau, Borodino, Wagram). Napoléon a même connu des défaites terribles et peu glorieuses (Leipzig). Napoléon était par contre très bon dans l'art opérationnel, ou "art opératif". C'était surtout un grand maître de la propagande, il a su bâtir sa légende, et les commentaires le prouvent une fois de plus. On peut aussi s'interroger sur la baraka de Napoléon, ça ne m'étonnerait pas qu'il y ait de l'occultisme derrière tout ça ( cf Jean-Paul Franceschi de la chaîne Supraconscience).
Deve ter vivido muitos momentos gloriosos com o exército francês, já que pouparam-lhe a vida mesmo depois de ter perdido batalhas decisivas e praticamente arruinar a liderança da França no cenário europeu.
E quem meteu a França no topo da Europa?Napoleão,quem trouxe a gloria à muito tempo perdida da França?Napoleão,quem foi o general que mais venceu batalhas na história?Não é César,Genshis Kan,Oda Nobunaga,Cao Cao,Alexandre o Grande mas sim Napoleão Bonaparte.Mesmo que tenha perdido a guerra contra Inglaterra Áustria Prússia Rússia Portugal e mais alguns,foi ele que fez a França que não chegava aos pés da Inglaterra na super potência da época,tendo conquistado e expandido a muito mais a França que hitler com a Alemanha Nazi.
c'est dommage qu'il soit allé à la guerre en Russie. répété le sort de nombreux dirigeants d'Europe, qui ont vu leur fin sans gloire dans les étendues de la Russie
Ça me fait rire tous ces gens qui disent vive l'empereur. Aujourd'hui les français sont tous égoïste en ne pensant qu'à eux . C'est toujours "ma liberté , mes droits ...." mais bizarrement j'entend jamais " pour mon pays " Franchement j'aimerai bien que demain que il y ait une vrai guerre que la conscription soit relancé pour voir le nombre réel de volontaire prêt à mourir à pour la France. Perso je suis sur que la très très grande majorité de français aujourd'hui refuseront de se battre et iront faire leur sport favori , manifesté dans la rue pour dire qui veulent pas se battre parce qu'ils ont piscine ou le bac blanc à bosser 😂😂
@@emmanuel3490 je trouve que tu exagere un peu Ok les Français sont plus un frein envers la France qu'autre chose mais elle est quand même 5eme puissance mondiale et il y a des tas de gens qui voudraient défendre leur pays (moi y compris)
Après tu as parfaitement raison avant la France était 1ere puissance mondiale les Français était fière de leur pays Et maintenant tout le monde s'en fout de la france on dirait qu'ils ignorent que ce pays est super badass et qu'il a forgé l'histoire
Говорю, как русский фетишист много французского, Наполеон был действительно великий человек, во многом я считаю его своим кумиром. Жаль что его ждала такая незавидная участь, в дали от своей Родины, Армии, Жены(Мария-Луиза), Сына, Жозефины, Семьи...
Really? The guy was defeated multiple times, and while he built a sizeable empire, several others conquered larger domains, some of which endured far longer (such as the Mongols and Persians), and there are several commanders who remained undefeated for life, despite fighting in numerous battles. He accomplished a lot for certain, but calling him the greatest glosses over the accomplishments of others, and his own shortcomings.
@@michaelt.5672 Well we might want to consider that Napoleon was at the time of firearms and all of Europe was specifically targeting France to restore the monarchy. All of Europe united is a formidable force to recon with! Not to diminish the Accomplishments of the Mongols or Persians or anyone else's but the difference is that the whole continent was not against them so they were able to take down nations one by one not fighting all at the same time! I m not sure if we can call Napoleon the greatest general but he sure remains in the league of the greatest generals of all time!
@@michaelt.5672 he survived many coalitions with very few losses in terms of battles. The whole time, there was organized opposition against him. I don’t know if he’s nessesarily the greatest, and his empire wasn’t massive, but he was very good
@@michaelt.5672 This kind of thing comes up in discussions of who was the greatest boxer of all time, too. Rocky Marciano won 49 fights and never lost, but if you put him in the ring with Muhammad Ali, who won 56 fights and lost 5, you could argue "Well, Rocky Marciano clearly had a better record, he defended his title successfully, he was never defeated, he had a similar number of wins" but it completely glosses over the competition he faced. Muhammad Ali fought George Foreman, Joe Frazier, Larry Holmes, Ken Norton, Earnie Shavers, Sonny Liston, he simply had so many more MUCH tougher opponents than Rocky Marciano. It's the same with Napoleon. When you look closely at what Napoleon accomplished, he turned around seemingly lost battles, like Marengo and Wagram, he was able to pull off impossibly clean victories against larger forces commanded by as accomplished men as himself, like when he surrounded General Mack's 45 000 man army with 30 000 men because he knew that Mack would fall for a distraction and not move from his position and Napoleon was able to dangerously split his men and surround him, winning a battle against a larger force without firing a shot (Mack surrendered his 45 000 man army), or the time that Napoleon drew the combined Russian/Austrian force at Austerlitz into attacking his deliberately weakened flank, which was only saved by Davout's miraculous arrival after a 2 day forced march from Vienna, and the result of which caused so many territorial concessions from Austria that a 1000 year long empire, the Holy Roman Empire, effectively no longer existed and was dissolved by Francis I who was then only Emperor of Austria after that. His military reforms now form the basis of the world's premier militaries: he invented the corps system, where a large army was divided into smaller armies that were self-sufficient and mobile and intended to be able to arrive to assist another corps after a single day of fighting, this allowed him to cover more ground, gather more supplies, acquire more accurate and complete intelligence on the enemy's position, and even pin them down for long enough for reinforcements to arrive and turn the tide. This allowed seemingly impossible feats such as the surrounding of Mack and the double victory of Jena-Auerstadt. You could say "Yeah but Alexander the Great was never defeated. Hannibal set the record for the most men killed in a single day of combat for 2000 years. Genghis Khan took over almost the entire solar system" but it specifically declines to recognize just how much the odds were stacked against Napoleon for literally every major power in Europe to declare war on him, sometimes simultaneously, and still easily win victories against them.
@@jacktattis Is Wellington known for pioneering a code akin to the revolutionary progressive Napoleonic Code? Or is he simply known for being a killer dressed in uniform like all other soldiers?
@@jacktattis All wellington had to do was wait for Marshal Soult to stop pillaging the countryside and show up for a battle, the french troops in spain were demoralized, hungry and dying by the dozen through diseases alone, he also ran away from spain with his army when he was losing
Ça me fait rire tous ces gens qui disent vive l'empereur. Aujourd'hui les français sont tous égoïste en ne pensant qu'à eux . C'est toujours "ma liberté , mes droits ...." mais bizarrement j'entend jamais " pour mon pays " Franchement j'aimerai bien que demain que il y ait une vrai guerre que la conscription soit relancé pour voir le nombre réel de volontaire prêt à mourir à pour la France. Perso je suis sur que la très très grande majorité de français aujourd'hui refuseront de se battre et iront faire leur sport favori , manifesté dans la rue pour dire qui veulent pas se battre parce qu'ils ont piscine ou le bac blanc à bosser 😂😂
@@emmanuel3490 slt mec , pour info j'ai donné 10 ans de ma vie à la France , j'ai servi dans la Marine Nationale , j'ai fait 2 conflits , j'ai représenté la France dans les nombreux pays que j'ai pû visiter . Belle journée à toi 👍
They were a combination of new recruits and veterans, the latter, who, coincidentally, once served under Napoleon's command. The recruits were too frightened or intimidated, whereas the veterans respected and honoured their once-exiled commander. The common soldier and officer alike couldn't bring themselves to bear of shooting the same commander that gloriously lead them to victory for many years.
What people today don’t understand about Napoleon is that the French Army of the coalition wars was different from other armies. Most European armies of the time consisted of a combination of serfs (or semi-serfs) and mercenaries, with the officers drawn from the ranks of the nobility who owned the land worked by those serfs. The French army also consisted of peasants, but those peasants were free landowners who owned the soil they worked, and the officers of that army weren’t aristocrats, but also the sons of peasants whose families owned the soil they worked on. They might be peasants, but they felt like lords, and in a way they were. More, the war they were fighting secured their own property, if France expanded, their own families‘ wealth might expand; if the Coalition won, it wouldn‘t and worst case they might have to become serfs again. As a result, this army was extremely motivated and well-led, and Napoleon personifies the qualities of that Army. Moreover, to the vast majority of people, he personified a stare of affairs where not only was France powerful, but they themselves were personally free and (relatively) wealthy. That‘s why he was worshipped like a god even a century after his death, and that‘s the crucial difference between the last French Kings, and the first French Emperor.
Such a wild event. If it was in a work of fiction, no one would believe it could happen. He just comes back and says “yeah, I’m in charge again” and everyone just agrees lol.
@Fleur Thank you, Lord Varys
Charism from 1 to 100
Funny thing: it IS a work of fiction.
In reality, things didn't happen like that at all.
Starting his return, Bonaparte had won over many soldiers with a simple tool: money.
Then, at Laffrey, he had around 1200 peasants in front of him; if the opposing soldiers started to shoot, the peasants would take the bullets, not Bonaparte.
Cough Cough Benito Mussolini Cough Cough Italian Social Republic
@@MelerionTheFirst It wasn't so much charisma, as much as everyone then serving the obviously castrated bourbon restoration was shitting themselves at the idea of a mass revolution in favour of napoleon by the populace, who loved him for his land and legal reforms (which where being overturned by the king). They weighed their options and probably thought serving in his inner circle was a much better option to their head on a pike from an angry populace. They where also keenly aware that the common solider loved Napoleon for again, his victories, military reforms (Napoleonic France was one of the first armies to introduce a meritocracy in their officer class) and again his land reforms which favored veterans. It definitely was charisma in terms of how he projected his public image, but I think by this point privately many in his inner circle had dubious loyalties to say the least, with the possible exception of Ney, and where their more to save their own power and social position than out of any personal loyalty to Napoleon.
Early in his career, right after a victory, a French soldier stated, “He’s not like the other Generals, he’s covered in mud and blood!”
This was after Napoleon had jumped in to replace a man shot through the eye that was aiming and loading a cannon. He continued to shout orders while operating the cannon. That’s a leader
I dont see that anywhere
well he was an artillery officer after all
That's what is written at least ;)
He got bayoneted through the leg at toulon and led a charge at arcole Bridge!
Ele é um carniceiro, isso sim, revolucionário de merda
Fun fact. This happened not just once but multiple times. The French king kept sending armies against Napoleon and all of them joined him.
Que trolls
Ah yes the armies I keep sending are simply being charisma checked, I know, I'll send some more!
An army can only lead by respect.
bro has that aura fr fr
Ovvio, insieme a Napoleone andavano a derubare mezza europa
I knew a Greek man we used to work together, his name was Napoleon. His father's, grandfather's, grand grand father's and so on until the generation back in centuries where his ancestor happened to be a proud soldier of Napoleon Bonaparte and ever since they were naming their boys Napoleon. Has to be some devotion and admiration towards the man.
Les Bonaparte étaient des "collabos" et étaient très mal vus en Corse. (ils collaboraient avec les Français à qui Gênes avait vendu la Corse). Les Français avaient envoyé 30 000 hommes sur l'île afin de contraindre les Corses à payer leurs impôts...
Yeah, there was a Greek man named Napoleon in my neighbourhood too.
@onoma eponimo not Corsican?
@@amaharra8569 he was mostly italian
@onoma eponimo 😂😂😂
3 minutes that are better than the whole Ridley Scott movie...
Confirmo
Joaquin Phoenix wasnt that Good
True !
It was a Ridley Scott movie, not a Joaquin Phoenix movie. Joaquin is an amazing actor, and did a good job with what he was presented. But whatever it was that he was presented with, it wasn’t Napoleon.
@@Ludovicus1769agreed. Joaquin is not to be blamed here
One of the best films in history. This film by Sergei Bondarchuk is still considered in Hollywood as a kind of illustrated manual on how to shoot a truly epic and lively movie with huge masses of people. However, today they don’t know how to shoot like that - everything is replaced with effects, doll-like pop modern faces and a green screen. The era of mediocrity.
Pensé que estaba solo en el mundo con tu mismo pensamiento.
Title of film??
@@noobtextwritergamer"Waterloo" (1970)
Vous avez bien raison. Le film tout récent réalisé par Ridley Scott avec Joaquin Phoenix dans le rôle de l'Empereur n'est vraiment pas à la hauteur de celui de Sergei Bondarchuk.
Le film de Ridley Scott n' est même pas à la hauteur de la version avec Clavier
Considering how soldiers were trained to obey orders without question and immediately, it's remarkable that nobody fired when the order was given.
No i'm french and he says "if you want to kill me ! SHOOT !" thats mean soldier doesn't want to kill him
It was Napoleon, if nobody else was firing and you fired everyone would beat you up for killing the emperor
@@mickgordon9980 VIVE L'EMPEREUR
@@NoahGNC but the Maréchal told his crew to fire ("FEU!")
@@lokmanlablan Frère il a pas dis ça.
Dude had an entire era named after him. I saw his portrait in a nightclub in Bangkok. I'm from India and even in our history, Hyder Ali of Mysore kingdom used to maintain contact with Napoleon Bonaparte to coordinate against the English. His effect on the world was mind blowing.
I have read a biography of his a long time ago but I don't remember this scene. I wish someone like Conn Iggulden would cover Napoleon the way he covered Genghis or Caeser.
Hyder Ali died in 1782. Napoleon became emperor in 1804.
Simon Scarrow did a very good book series on Napoleon and The Duke of Wellington. They are well worth a read. I moved on to them after I read Conn Igguldens books which are fantastic too.
This scene is from his return out of exile to Elba. Where the reinstated monarchy send a small army to intercept him, they ended up joining him instead.
Or cover the Napoleon wars similar to how he covered the wars of the roses
@@rudranshsharma7453 😂😂😂😂
A lot of film enthusiasts lament the fact that Kubrick never made his Napoleon film. I always direct people to this movie, an outstanding achievement that has stood the test of time, like the man himself.
Well, he might not pick up the ladies, but he sure knows how to pick up the boys.
Doesn't pick up swords either
With ladies he can only have temporary pleasure
But with the boys he can conquer the world (Europe)
@@iPodiMaster yes, breasts are simply marvelous. But they shall pass. Only the glory of France, that is eternal :)))
@@Serby665 holding breasts is fun but have you considered holding sword
@@iPodiMaster that was temporary too though
Hats off to the soldier who picked you the sabre and offered it to Napoleon, all for the glory.
Old Guard probably on he's side since the start
А перед солдатом ,упавшим в обморок снимите?😊
This is 10x better than the scene in the new sh*tty movie
Even though he lost at the end but for me this is the greatest comeback in history.
He was amazing but no...there was no comeback
@@olliefoxx7165 learn your history
@@LeeRenthlei Waterloo was no comeback. St. Helena was no comeback. I suppose his body being brought back to Paris and placed in a beautiful cherry wood coffin in Invalides is a type of comeback.
While I certainly enjoy French history and such riveting Napoleon bios as that of Schom, et al, Napoleon's was a wasted life that wasted millions of other lives. His legacy left some accomplishments for the French people but was not done peaceably.
You can say he led the last great French army. After all, France has not won a "Super Bowl" since. LOL.
@@Gablesman888 island of Elba was a comeback.
@@Gablesman888 the comeback is the one in the scene, not after
His ability to pick up a sword and hand it to its owner is just beyond belief
It is a wonderful movie scene, but not fully accurate. It summarizes the encounter close to Laffrey, where a Battalion sent to arrest Napoleon turned to his side after he addressed them, and the later event at Auxerre, where Marshall Ney arranged to meet Napoleon for the same purpose. No sword was surrender or returned.
What’s so amazing about picking up a piece of metal & handing it back to someone?
Yes, and remember that THAT commander is who gave the order to SHOOT Napoleon. Napoleon had a Jesus-like capacity to forgive (because he just wanted to move on and have a stronger army, so he forgave that man for the sake of a stronger & unified army, when he could have easily ordered him executed for doing what HE tried to do to HIM). WOW. WHATTA MAN INDEED.
@@Aven-Sharma1991 General Salute, Present Arms = Take my weapon and kill me with it.
@@Aven-Sharma1991 You Are Jealous With Napoleon
Napoleon Bonaparte is one of the only great men in history to exist in a vaccum, that is to say without him nobody else would have led France to imperium as he did. Napoleon single handedly altered the tajectory of human history without anyone else who could have filled that role
He was a very useless man .he succumbed in Spain at battle of Bailen .😂
"single handedly": Which hand, left or right one?!?
He was also not the son of the nobility or from a Wealthy family he was literally a random dude that changed the world forever, but he was also mounted on the powerful spirit of the french revolution
@@StraussBR he changed the world for worse.
Useless man,
@@StraussBR He was son of nobility, but a very poor (for a nobility) noble family
It took most of the family finances to send him to france in a military school, feat which was not exactly possible for most of the third estate
While I agree he wasn't exactly much before his rise, he still had some luck at birth.
And for sure, he went far above what anyone else would've thought possible from his birth.
As a Pole (someone Polish, from Poland) I must say we kind of worship him, do we?
I mean, he litterally established the Duchy of Warsaw and after the wars ended there was this thing called the "Napoleonic Spirit" where Poles living in Prussia Russia and Austria thought Napoleon was some sort of eldritch angel sent by the catholic God to grant Poland independence and to curse the partitioners.
He also designed our flag which I think is pretty cool.
As a polish from Brazil I confirm That.
@@henriquewoinarski4617 É verdade que os Católicos Polonêses acreditam que Napoleão foi enviado por Deus de alguma forma?
Uhh not like it was free lol, still a client state to France, so no different really
@@GolovanJot Client state is better than annexation to be honest
He also kind of allowed us to do our thing as long as we sent atleast 10 thousand men every year to support his empire so
@@CaliCracksGaming Which is pretty standard levy for empires.
Vous imaginez la même scène avec Manuel Valls, François Hollande, ou Emmanuel Macron, Melechon, Le Pen...la moitié du regiment execute l'ordre.
la moitié t'es sympa ^^
Combien executent l'ordre, je ne sais pas. Ce don je suis sûr, c'est que certain n'attendront pas l'ordre pour tirer.
Le Pen la moitié si c'est la fille seulement, le reste... c'est tout le regiment qui ouvre le feu tellement leur conviction patriotique c'est du papier maché par le fion
la moitié ? ha ha, trop gentil ^^
@@rylodinson6100 ouais, parce que Marine Le Pen c'est une femme justement. L'autre moitié ils l'enverrons aux cuisines réglementaires.... (ça fait sexiste, mais c'est de l'époque)
So are you telling me that the man that almost subjugated a whole continent was a charismatic and military genius and not a weirdo like the man in Ridley Scott's movie? Impressive.
Truly, who could have imagined this? There's a quote that such people do not comprehend. "It is more honorable to be raised to a throne than to be born to one. Fortune bestows the one, merit obtains the other." And such men as rise to become emperors do not do so by random chance alone.
That movie is a monstrosity. Looking back on history, there are all sorts of incredible figures - El Cid, Saladin, Napoleon, Alexander etc. who are all complex and interesting people. The Ridley Scott's of the world would like to present all of them as if they were just a panoply of awkward invalids to make themselves feel better.
It's sad.
Its been about a decade but if memory serves correct...... in that scene the mounted man was sent to kill or capture. Steely eyed Napolean called on his troop's faith in France and in him. Once the lad feinted at the thought of shooting his hero, all of the others rushed leave the mounted general's side. Of course, they knew each other and had great respect for each other. At this moment Bonaparte knew he needed Generals and by sparing this one's life in glorious manor, he knew he had his second
That general is actually Marshal Michel Ney.
@Bender B. Rodrigues Well, we can't completely blame Ney. Napoleon was very absent that day and Ney was only the bravest of the brave, not the smartest of the smart. On the other side Wellington was partout. Always present and showing himself when needed. That contrast in leadership on that day made a lot of difference. And the arrival of the Germans too.
Besides, very few of the Corsican's commanders were executed after the 100 days. Ney was.
(edit) During his trial, his lawyer tried to save him by declaring that he was now Prussian (his hometown had become German at the time) but Ney interrupted him by saying: "Je suis Français et je resterais Français!" A truly brave man.
@@wellesmorgado4797 If I were to offer my own view of the situation, it seems as though Napoleon had given up after the harsh rains during the night of 17th June 1815 before the grand Battle of Waterloo. When on the 16th Michel Ney failed to stop Wellington's forces from regrouping at Qatre Bras, I recall reading in Bernard Cornwell's historical book Waterloo that Napoleon lost his temper at the failure to overrun the coalition and told Ney, "With this, you've lost France!"
@@theaerotrooper Yes, it was probably a very big strategical blunder failing to prevent the regrouping. But it also might be, in part, a blame deflecting technique. During the main battle nothing was really decided & the old Napoleon might have snatched victory from the jaws of defeat. But that old Napoleon was nowhere to be found...
Этим генералом всадником был его же бывший маршал Мишель Ней
Napoleão era tão carismático que até o Seu Madruga tava lutando por ele.
Fd que a cena é 100% real
era o Bolsonaro ali?
@@kfaedicoes era teu pai
@@walysonaugusto2442 por isso que ele sumiu
@Miguel Lopez Nieto How can you call Portuguese an indigenous language?
Easily the most dramatic moment of the journey came the following day a few hundred yards south of the town of Laffrey, where Napoleon encountered a battalion of the 5th Line in a narrow area between two wooded hills on what is today called La Prairie de la Rencontre. According to Bonapartist legend, Napoleon, standing before them well within musket range, with only his far smaller number of Imperial Guardsmen protecting him, threw back his iconic grey overcoat and pointed to his breast, asking if they wanted to fire on their Emperor. In testament to the continuing power of his charisma, the troops threw down their muskets and mobbed him.118 Napoleon had previously been informed by two officers of the pro-Bonapartist attitudes of the demi-brigade, but a single shot from a royalist officer could have brought about a very different outcome. Savary, who wasn’t present, told a slightly less heroic version, in which Napoleon’s conversational style and habit of question-asking saved the day. The Emperor approached; the battalion kept a profound silence. The officer who was in command ordered them to aim their muskets: he was obeyed; if he had ordered Fire we cannot say what would have happened. The Emperor didn’t give him time: he talked to the soldiers and asked them as usual: ‘Well! How are you doing in the 5th?’ The soldiers answered ‘Very well, Sire.’ Then the Emperor said: ‘I’ve come back to see you; do some of you want to kill me?’ The soldiers shouted ‘Oh! That, no!’ Then the Emperor reviewed them as usual and thus took possession of the 5th Regiment. The head of the battalion looked unhappy.119 When Napoleon himself told the story he said he had adopted a jovial, old-comrade attitude towards the troops: ‘I went forward and held out my hand to a soldier, saying, “What, you old rascal, were you about to fire on your Emperor?” “Look here,” he answered, showing me that his musket was not loaded.’120 He also put the success down to having his veterans with him: ‘It was the bearskin helmets of my Guards which did the business. They called to memory my glorious days.’121 Whether Napoleon had been declamatory or conversational at that tense moment, he showed great nerve. Laffrey also represented a watershed, because for the first time regular soldiers, rather than peasants or National Guardsmen, had come over to his side. (Napoleon by Andrew Roberts)
Thank you
Thank you!
c'est dommage qu'il soit allé à la guerre en Russie. répété le sort de nombreux dirigeants d'Europe, qui ont vu leur fin sans gloire dans les étendues de la Russie
Even here in the Philippines,which is geographically far from Europe and France.Napoleon is still influential name we knew about French history..what a great man.Vive l'empereur or in Philippine words "Mabuhay ang Emperador!"
Correct, akala maliit isya pero normal raman diay sia
Bonifacio read his works and also he is popular here too
Thank you from France 🇫🇷 🤝🇵🇭
@@qtndvn9327Same as much different a color of nation flag. 🇫🇷🇫🇷🤝🇵🇭🇵🇭
Read who stopped him then , the famous red coats that’s who
Not how it really went down. But what a great moment in history. France. Napoleon the year the era. Perfection. In human events. I'm a marine I would of followed him blindly. He was a true leader of men s hearts. A man's man.
В реальности думаю кто-нибудь выстрелил бы из солдат и всё
@@Трансформацияличности-я8б éoq?
Following another man blindly is not a very smart way of living.
@@no-one9484 and look at our "smart" world now where nobody follows anyone. Stuck in cocoons on our phones, ranting about we are so individualistic, as our societies degrade around us.
A Marine would follow a can of soup blindly!
Dans cette scène tout le charisme d'un vrai leader qui ne se cache pas derrière ces soldats.
Napoléon n'a jamais eu peur de la mort ni de montrer l'exemple.
Vive l'empereur!!!
Pas jusque là
@@salamyier3628 et pourquoi pas ???
@@enguerranddupaty90 Laisse, il fait parti des personnes qui ne connaissent rien à l'Histoire avec un grand "H", et qui sont incapables de prendre du recul sur leur présent. Difficile à raisonner, perds pas ton temps.
Vive l'Empereur !
👍👍👍
@@leduoanime9156 merci et d’accord avec toi
Vive l’empereur
"The ideas that underpin our modern world-meritocracy, equality before the law, property rights, religious toleration, modern secular education, sound finances, and so on-were championed, consolidated, codified and geographically extended by Napoleon. To them he added a rational and efficient local administration, an end to rural banditry, the encouragement of science and the arts, the abolition of feudalism and the greatest codification of laws since the fall of the Roman Empire.
" -Andrew Roberts, British historian.
@@WolverineXOXO "You will own nothing (not even yourself) and you will be happy."
Yeah but no. If He saw todays europe He whould not be happy
@@WolverineXOXO Napoleon was a progressive. He was opposed to the conservative politics of his time. All of the reforms mentioned in the above comment were directly opposed by the conservative and traditionalist rulers of his time. Your comment is fairly ironic, in that you are taking the side of conservatism and traditionalism, just as Napoleon’s opponents did.
Quite true. And a decade of war.
@@broksholk4771 Napoleon came about because the situation needed a Napoleon. The French Revolution had disgressed into tyrannical murder. Such does not represent Conservatism.
It is much better than 2023 napoleon
Waterloo 1970 movie accurate than Napoleon 2023
Eine der großartigsten Szenen aus diesem beeindruckenden Spielfilm, auch phantastisch gut gespielt.
Das einmalige CHARISMA von Napoleon I. wird hier gut dokumentiert. Sein nie abreißender Kontakt zum "einfachen Soldaten", vermochte die hohe Kampfmoral seiner Truppen kaum erschüttern.
Die Bedeutung des menschlichen Willens - gerade im Krieg - wird hier sichtbar!
👍
napoleon war wohl eigentlich ein guter Kerl und die meisten normalen Menschen mochten ihn..
Nur eben der Adel, der mochte ihn nicht!! wahrscheinlich wohl eben deswegen!
@@Knebebelmeyer ER paßte eben nicht in das "alte System" - und schuf sich daher ein neues !
Als "Kind der Revolution" bekam NAPOLEON dafür unerwartete Machtmittel ausgehändigt.
@@kaiguleikoff7742 Eigentlich brachte er Ordnung und Richtung zu einer Revolution die den Verstand verloren hatte.
Seine Rolle war anscheinend die Revolution zu verbreiten und die Ancien Regime schwere Schaden hinzuzufügen.
@@bpeper1365 NAPOLEON rettete die Französische Revolution vor dem Untergang - durch Einführung seiner Autokratie. Dadurch trug ER dazu bei, die bürgerlichen Ideen der Revolution über ganz Europa zu verbreiten - mit der Kaiserkrone auf dem Haupt. Die ganze Widersprüchlichkeit von Geschichtsentwicklung kann an NAPOLEON gut erklärt werden.
Not shown in this scene, the wheelbarrow Napoleon used to transport his enormous ballsack. Stood in front of hundreds of men all pointing their guns at him, he opened his coat and told them to go ahead and kill him if they wanted to. This happened more than once with army after army sent to arrest him joining his cause.
There's never being a better movie about him. A larger than life man deserves a larger than life movie! This was awesome!
possible one of the most bad ass things that has actually happened
Essa cena aconteceu exatamente assim. Luís XVIII cometeu a burrice de mandar o Exército Francês capturar/matar Napoleão que retornava do primeiro exílio, justamente o grupo armado que mais adorava o antigo imperador. E assim ele entrou sem resistência em Paris e iniciou o Governo dos Cem Dias, tentando um acordo com as potências europeias para reconhecer a restauração do Império. Mas os líderes do Velho Continente formaram a aliança que derrubou definitivamente Napoleão em Waterloo, após vários confrontos menores.
Olha rapaz, vim ver o vídeo e acabo recebendo uma aula de história. Muito Obrigado!
@DANIEL explique melhor então
@DANIEL sem dúvida. O enem está logo ali.
Napoleão tomou um tiro na bunda não foi à toa
Cadu Sindona Can anyone explain(In English, I can't understand this language)- why is the world history so Euro-centric?!
Rod Steiger performed the greatest portrayal of Napoleon Bonaparte ever- and it doesn't look as though even Joaquin Phoenix will change that.
Да, наверное лучшее изображение Бонапарта в кино.
Lets reserve the judgement for after watching the movie - I can't wait to watch it!
Mark my words: they are going to make Joaquin Phoenix appear meek and cuck the shit out of him in the modern movie. The appetite of the culture war cannot be satiated it would seem
@@styxrakash4639 well no - which culture war are you talking about? there is nothing woke or color in this movie. Are you sad there is no angle for a culture war?
@@styxrakash4639 This historical drama's already badly inaccurate. Napoleon never led a single cavalry charge in his life- and he never fired on the Pyramids. That- in a film made by Ridley Scott, of all people- is a stunner.
Any hope for a quality film work on Napoleon resides with Steven Spielberg- who's currently at work on a mini- series on the Emperor.
« « « On ne conduit le peuple qu’en lui montrant un avenir ; un chef est un marchand d’espérance « « « NAPOLÉON
Macron n'est pas un chef donc.
@@timl7935 MACRON un chef ??? 😂😂😂manipulé pour organiser la destruction du pays sous toutes ses formes J’ai le champagne 🥂 au frais dès fois qu’il lui arriverait une bricole .......
@@dominiquetortrat2956 Un chasse-neige sur une piste de décollage en hiver un matin ou un soir... Un conducteur "alcoolisé" c'est vite arrivé ein
Genialne.
True dat. Je cherche un vrai chef...de cuisine, qui peut préparer mon dîner!
Greatest field general of all time, nobody is even close.
👍👌
Oh, I think there were some equal, even better, just less known.
А.В Суворов!!!!!!!
Не проиграл о отличие от Б.Наполеона ( хотя я тоже им восхищаюсь) - ни одного сражения.....
@@yarpenzirgin1826 many good generals, probably Alexander the great
Was the best, but take in account the number of battles Napoleon was
The best.
@@barbt.9211 Everyone has his own favorite I suppose.
For variety of reasons.
Militarily Napoleon was good, but there were some equally good if not better.
My personal best is Jan Zizka.
Czech general who never lost a battle, always fought against superior forces, both in numbers and equipment, and was winning battles even when he got blind as result of the wounds.
Napoleon Bornapate was, and still the greatest Army General the world has ever had
Alexander The Great is turning in his grave right now.
Facts
@@Godsson32128 After Alexander the Great 👍🦁
@@realrembrandt8273cap
U Forget hte Greatest - Aleksandr Suvorov !
I see that Napoleon has acquired a Haoshoku Haki already
this is a Kiai
Is real name is Napoléon D Bonaparte is a D, the real life joy boy. 😆
@@manucharo181 LMAOO no wonder XD
Yes, Napoleon D'Bonaparte
@@LeGrandConsilium ahahaha true XD
No otaku
Highly charismatic and a military genius🔥
You haven't seen his return after the Russian invasion.
@@abeninan4017 yes I have seen the Six days' campaign and that just put him above any modern General
@@deepakarya5102 you got it wrong. Napolean marched in to Moscow with 500000 soliders 7 months later he returned to France with 35 soliders, some historians say it was 250 soliders.
@@abeninan4017 i know that..i am not saying Russia wasn't his blunder....his military tactics were still out of this world..even Hannibal got defeated, but still wasn't he genius ?
@@abeninan4017but still, he managed to burn the Moscow.
C'est beaucoup mieux que Ridley Scott 😊
Não fazem filmes como antigamente- filme perfeito esse
Carrément, avec ridley Scott c est "oh ma Josephine tu m excite 🤤🤤"
@andyr6495 oui un peu comme toi,fini à la pisse de chacal en rut 😊
100 days were interesting and added to the legend of Napoleon, how he returned and took the hearts of the entire army once again. But the ending was inglorious, at Waterloo and then dying like some refugdeee at St Helen. I wonder how well he was guarded, and why nobody offered to rescue him. Some of the American privateers for example, we know that the US fought against the Brits also.
Napoleons return for 100 days was a great gamble but not a dumbass move. He sensed the coalition falling apart. Emperor Alexander of Russia was having none of his alkies bs
A british captain called Thomas Cochrane tried to pick him up and take him to south america to be emporer, but napoleon was already too ill when cochrane got to saint helena. again, you wouldnt beleive it if it was fiction.h
Even though napoleon lost in the end, just like Cleveland fans, they still love their team
I read that there were rumors that some in the coalition wanted to relocate him from Elba to somewhere more remote like St Helena. It may have also motivated Napoleon to try to regain power.
В то время Франция была более пьяной, чем Россия
Wasn't there a full British garrison and two warships tasked to watch him 24/7?
a great movie. Rod should have won an Oscar
It's funny how in every movie he is portrayed as short when we know he was average for the time at 1.65 m tall. The French metric system said 1.55 m, people misunderstood, and even after it was confirmed as a mistake it was too late! They still teach it wrong in school today! This world is full of funny mistakes like that...
He was short. Mozart was short. Madison was short. Height does not define greatness.
Not 1. 65 m but 1.69 m
@@macollectant5942 Oh sorry I confused the average height with Napoleons height! Right so he was a little bit above average for his time!
Bloody English
Not just that, his Imperial Guard was always beside him which consisted of men who at minimum were 6'4 (this was an actual requirement) which made him kinda small looking in comparison
We were taught about napoleon in childhood at our school. A great general.Love from 🇮🇳
💕👍
Who cares
@@nikhilniki9333 i cared
Care you own country, indian man. Your country is sick enough.
@@DaGyi lmao retards like these make my day
The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.
-Sun Tzu, Art of War
Charisma : 100
Luck : 20
Agility: 0
Mani lunghe: 200 😂😂😂😂
I mean, La Grande Armée was actually faster than most armies at the time due to the corps system and a decent organization, so they were able to move across the continent faster than most enemies (which played into Bonaparte's strategy of decisive battles)
Ele não tinha medo da morte. Esse é um grande poder carismático.
Ростом мал,а людей угробил тьма!!!! Горит в аду
Ну это верно! Наполеон мог пошутить со смертью, отваги ему хватало! И на Аркольском мосту со знаменем в руках под картечным огнем, и в Яффе, когда с больными чумой солдатами здоровался за руку! Великий был человек!
@Miguel Lopez Nieto With this name and talking about indigean language. So stupid. Loser!
@Miguel Lopez Nieto , falou pouco, mas falou merda.
@Miguel Lopez Nieto read your own nome bro. Where do you think “Miguel” and “Lopez” came from? That “indigean language” is Portuguese, a latim language, same origin as your name
MARSHAL NEY: I have an army!
NAPOLEON: I have a Napoleon.
Один из самых интересных и великих людей в истории человечества.
Величайших друг!!
@@АлмасКоянбаев-ц5ф ну, был же ещё Рим…
@@bigmek4051 А причём тут Рим ?
психопат. у нас в истории России таких полно
@@JediMik я могу назвать только пару имён которые могут сравниться с этим весёлым Корсиканцем, к примеру Ленин, Сталин, Жуков (если считать только военные заслуги), так же я бы кинул сюда ещё Петра первого, Суворова и Кутузова, но последние два отличились только как хорошие военные.
I am Armenian and i have absolute respect for Napoleon
О, привет
Vives nos frères et soeurs d'Arménie ! 😀👍👍
потому что не теряли свободу, не цените её
Vive la France et vive L'EMPEREUR !🔵⚪🔴
Votez le Z POUR PLUS DE BONAPARTISME !
@@bababxl4356 t'a raison ✊🏻🇲🇫
👌👍
@@bababxl4356 Je comprend pas la référence, c'est quoi le z ?
@@_Usaco Zemmour 😔
Vive l'Empereur, vive Napoléon 1er
A jamais le meilleur des Français de tous les temps🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷👍👍🇫🇷🇫🇷
Italofrancese prego. 😉👌🏻
@@MarcoFariello VIVE LA FRANCE
BEN VOYONS
Viva gli Stati Uniti d'Europa.
Napoléon le plus grand français de tous les temps
1m73 🤔
@@zhahahaha1 et la moyenne française en 1800 était de 1,64....donc
Anche il piú grande ladro di tutti i tempi 😂😂😂
Le plus grand français était corse …..
@@geca9594 Se lui non avesse riunito l'Italia una prima volta non avreste avuto il vostro paese !
I remember,He said once, " If you want to shoot the emperor, you may stand forth "
Давайте поклонимся режиссёру Сергею Бондарчуку за создание этого шедевра. В то время никто не мог снимать батальные сцены как он. Никто не мог выразить актёром такие эмоции как он. Никто не был так популярен в этой ипостаси как он. Слава памяти великого советского режиссёра!
Imagine how much of a legend napoleon msutve been
"Dał nam przykład Bonaparte, jak zwyciężać mamy!"
"lol" „Naucz się pisać cudzysłów bo napisałeś coś zupełni innego.”
@@Paullopicarr a co to dyktando, wolna pisownia ze słownikiem durniu
The retreat from Moscow?Great win,ask his frozen soldiers.
@kalispera2505 Keep crying Brit always get carried by your stronger allies imaooooo
Amazing summary! Napoleon's charisma truly shines in this short, powerful video!
Уважаю Францию и великую французскую нацию. 🇰🇬🤝🇨🇵
ты националист? Это не модно.
@@MotralCombat Ты хотя бы знаешь определение слова националист? 🤦
@@azabolotovich8752 все нации равны, а тот кто взывает к величию, тот националистический пёс
Superbe, juste superbe
This movie was SO much better than the new one.
Ridley Scott really got the new one wrong. How very disappointing given his record.
Quel grand Napoléon, il en faudrait un nouveau pareil qui arrive en France pour remettre l'ordre.
*Quel grand homme
Perso je ne tient pas au retour du Hitler français qui a trouvé le moyen de se mettre en guerre permanente contre toute l'Europe et même au-delà.
Et il faudrait que les Français arrêtent d'attendre un chef pour qu'enfin, il y en ait un qui puisse surgir de la masse...
@@nous93 Hitler Français. Carrément.
Et que pensez-vous donc de la République, qui pour s'installer au pouvoir aura tué plusieurs millions de Français ? (les Vendéens sont loin d'être les seuls)
Napoléon n'a déclaré la guerre a aucun Etat Européen. Mais sans doute aurait-il fallut qu'il laisse la France aux Coalisés pour que votre Morale puisse y trouver son compte ?
@@nous93 C'est une mauvaise comparaison...
Величайший европейский лидер всех времён! Современные политики европы просто меркнут по сравнению с Наполеоном. Русский император Александр 3 неистово завидовал Наполеону, возможно это и стало причиной войны 1812 года. Которая много где в России освещается неполно и многие факты умалчиваются. Наполеон легендарная личность. Желаю Франции нового Бонапарта.
Александр III? Его зависть стала причиной войны 1812 года? Вы что-то путаете. Вам, вероятно, говорили о зависти Александра I. Не от большого ума говорили.
@@ВладимирВладимирович-т3ж клим ссаныч с профессором-расчленителем соколовым большим умом никогда не отличались, однако в уши нагадили многим интернет-пользователям
Тупиздень,почитай письма Наполеона императору России. "Дорогой брат,почему ты мочишь?".
@@sid_asid То есть война началась все-таки из-за зависти? Экономика и политика тут ни при чем, только зависть? Хочу услышать мнение эксперта с мировым именем.
@@ВладимирВладимирович-т3ж facepalm
One of the best films ever made. Someone uploaded it on UA-cam, and I love how Ney throws the sabre on the ground and the Old Guard member just hands it to Napoleon. Funny to me, I don’t know why
Probably because of the awkward silence
I adore this movie every scene is so spectacular.
Franchement ce serait sympa une série a gros budget sur les épopée de la vie de Napoléon. Mais manque de budget (voir les réalisations française ces dernières années) et pression idéologique d'une partie de la gauche cela n'aboutira jamais. Bien dommage mais ce film était bien, la première fois que je l'avais vu malheureusement, comme tous les film il a pu montré en long et en large, toutes les Batailles de Napoléon. Faut que la France immite les Turcs comme avec la série du siècle magnifique.
ca va arriver avec ridley scoot, peut etre joaquim phoenix en napoleon. certe ca ne sera pas francais, mais c'est ridley scott...
👍
@@arthi4022
Ouais mais j'ai peur du délire woke US, comme mettre des minorités. Je suis pas contre la diversité mais sur un film série qui se repose sur des plans historique où il n'y avait pas de multi culturalisme contexte de l'époque oblige, c'est juste pas possible autant des films/series de divertissement je m'en fous bien que dommage ( Ex The witcher) mais sur Napoléon ça passe pas ce serait offensant insultant réécriture de l'histoire. Et cela s'applique pour presque toutes les périodes de l'histoire, où il n'y a plus de débat.
Rohlala... ces gauchistes, toujours de leur faute, du CNC au grand remplacement...tout, je vous dis
@@le_draffar5370 “Un film série qui se repose sur des plans historique (sic) où il n'y avait pas de multi culturalisme“... la France etait deja un empire transcontinental et donc multiculturel a l epoque.
Сколько раз смотрю - столько раз слёзы наворачиваются❤❤❤
Vive l'Empire Français Vive l'Empereur 🇨🇵🇨🇵
Ça me fait rire tous ces gens qui disent vive l'empereur.
Aujourd'hui les français sont tous égoïste en ne pensant qu'à eux .
C'est toujours "ma liberté , mes droits ...." mais bizarrement j'entend jamais " pour mon pays "
Franchement j'aimerai bien que demain que il y ait une vrai guerre que la conscription soit relancé pour voir le nombre réel de volontaire prêt à mourir à pour la France.
Perso je suis sur que la très très grande majorité de français aujourd'hui refuseront de se battre et iront faire leur sport favori , manifesté dans la rue pour dire qui veulent pas se battre parce qu'ils ont piscine ou le bac blanc à bosser 😂😂
Уникальный случай в истории! Наполеон беспорно великая историческая личность!
I agree with you. It’s like Putin is the great nonentity of our time.
Ну да, угробил без толку кучу французских солдат и в итоге все просрал в Ватерлоо)
А Франция снова стала монархией)
@@NikolayDPR Без идиота и тут не обойтись.
@@NikolayDPR Ну обосрать можно кого угодно. Так ведь произошло со всеми велики людьми если посудить.
@@MrDonGeorgeO
Не вижу величия в тех, кто развязывал войны, в том числе - с моей страной.
Qui,comme moi,veut devenir un Napoléon Bonaparte.Ce leader charismatique m'étonne beaucoup.🎉🎉🎉
L'une des plus grosses erreurs de Napoléon a été d'envahir l'Espagne. Ça a été un véritable bourbier sans fin où il a épuisé des ressources militaires en vain.
Sinon ça reste le plus grand virtuose des tactiques et stratégies militaires de son temps.
Ну и не надо было идти на Россию
Merci Talleyrand
👌👍
Russie
St Domingue
Espagne
=FAIL
"Sinon ça reste le plus grand virtuose des tactiques et stratégies militaires de son temps" Non. ça n'était pas un grand stratège (au sens de Grande Stratégie). Sinon il n'aurait pas finit à Sainte Hélène. Bismarck était un grand stratège, par exemple. Les grands stratèges meurent dans leur lit, après avoir bâti et consolidé un état ou un empire. Et ce n'était pas toujours un très bon tacticien, beaucoup de ses victoires auraient pu très mal se terminer et n'ont connu une issue heureuse que grâce à des gros coups de chance ( Marengo par exemple, qui sans l'arrivée in extremis de Desaix pour lui sauver la mise aurait tourné à la déroute). Certains de ses officiers étaient eux de très grands tacticiens, comme Davout (sans Davout, à Austerlitz les choses auraient pu très mal se terminer). Et beaucoup des ses batailles étaient de sanglants match nuls, remportés grâce à ses gros bataillons et la qualité de l'outil militaire dont il disposait (Eylau, Borodino, Wagram). Napoléon a même connu des défaites terribles et peu glorieuses (Leipzig). Napoléon était par contre très bon dans l'art opérationnel, ou "art opératif". C'était surtout un grand maître de la propagande, il a su bâtir sa légende, et les commentaires le prouvent une fois de plus.
On peut aussi s'interroger sur la baraka de Napoléon, ça ne m'étonnerait pas qu'il y ait de l'occultisme derrière tout ça ( cf Jean-Paul Franceschi de la chaîne Supraconscience).
les bons vieux films à l'anciennes ça c'est la bonne époque !
C’est ça bravo 🎊 l’histoire qui se répète le monde est petit !
I wish I knew more about this incredible man
Won't be hard, there are few historical figures with so much written about
Jefferson better
"Read"
Deve ter vivido muitos momentos gloriosos com o exército francês, já que pouparam-lhe a vida mesmo depois de ter perdido batalhas decisivas e praticamente arruinar a liderança da França no cenário europeu.
Sim
E quem meteu a França no topo da Europa?Napoleão,quem trouxe a gloria à muito tempo perdida da França?Napoleão,quem foi o general que mais venceu batalhas na história?Não é César,Genshis Kan,Oda Nobunaga,Cao Cao,Alexandre o Grande mas sim Napoleão Bonaparte.Mesmo que tenha perdido a guerra contra Inglaterra Áustria Prússia Rússia Portugal e mais alguns,foi ele que fez a França que não chegava aos pés da Inglaterra na super potência da época,tendo conquistado e expandido a muito mais a França que hitler com a Alemanha Nazi.
@@potatolover1513 Meu zovo
c'est dommage qu'il soit allé à la guerre en Russie. répété le sort de nombreux dirigeants d'Europe, qui ont vu leur fin sans gloire dans les étendues de la Russie
@@ЮрийАфанасьев-г7х Sim, it's true.
That's what happens when you treat your fellow countrymen according to MERIT and not birth. The world needs this more than ever.
Truly a profound moment in history
that never happened lol
Eagle of france, God of war Napoléon
Vive Napoleon vive l'empereur 👍
Glory to Napoleon. Long live Napoleon. Long live France
Vive la France 🇨🇵👍
👏👍
Best country ever 🇨🇵
Ça me fait rire tous ces gens qui disent vive l'empereur.
Aujourd'hui les français sont tous égoïste en ne pensant qu'à eux .
C'est toujours "ma liberté , mes droits ...." mais bizarrement j'entend jamais " pour mon pays "
Franchement j'aimerai bien que demain que il y ait une vrai guerre que la conscription soit relancé pour voir le nombre réel de volontaire prêt à mourir à pour la France.
Perso je suis sur que la très très grande majorité de français aujourd'hui refuseront de se battre et iront faire leur sport favori , manifesté dans la rue pour dire qui veulent pas se battre parce qu'ils ont piscine ou le bac blanc à bosser 😂😂
@@emmanuel3490 je trouve que tu exagere un peu
Ok les Français sont plus un frein envers la France qu'autre chose
mais elle est quand même 5eme puissance mondiale et il y a des tas de gens qui voudraient défendre leur pays (moi y compris)
Après tu as parfaitement raison avant la France était 1ere puissance mondiale les Français était fière de leur pays
Et maintenant tout le monde s'en fout de la france on dirait qu'ils ignorent que ce pays est super badass et qu'il a forgé l'histoire
Napoleon Bonaparte. You are my idol. ✋
👍👍
Говорю, как русский фетишист много французского, Наполеон был действительно великий человек, во многом я считаю его своим кумиром. Жаль что его ждала такая незавидная участь, в дали от своей Родины, Армии, Жены(Мария-Луиза), Сына, Жозефины, Семьи...
Proper movie and accurate, unlike the RS nonsense.
He remains the greatest general in the history of mankind statistically speaking
Really? The guy was defeated multiple times, and while he built a sizeable empire, several others conquered larger domains, some of which endured far longer (such as the Mongols and Persians), and there are several commanders who remained undefeated for life, despite fighting in numerous battles.
He accomplished a lot for certain, but calling him the greatest glosses over the accomplishments of others, and his own shortcomings.
@@michaelt.5672 Well we might want to consider that Napoleon was at the time of firearms and all of Europe was specifically targeting France to restore the monarchy. All of Europe united is a formidable force to recon with! Not to diminish the Accomplishments of the Mongols or Persians or anyone else's but the difference is that the whole continent was not against them so they were able to take down nations one by one not fighting all at the same time! I m not sure if we can call Napoleon the greatest general but he sure remains in the league of the greatest generals of all time!
@@michaelt.5672 he survived many coalitions with very few losses in terms of battles. The whole time, there was organized opposition against him. I don’t know if he’s nessesarily the greatest, and his empire wasn’t massive, but he was very good
@@michaelt.5672 This kind of thing comes up in discussions of who was the greatest boxer of all time, too. Rocky Marciano won 49 fights and never lost, but if you put him in the ring with Muhammad Ali, who won 56 fights and lost 5, you could argue "Well, Rocky Marciano clearly had a better record, he defended his title successfully, he was never defeated, he had a similar number of wins" but it completely glosses over the competition he faced. Muhammad Ali fought George Foreman, Joe Frazier, Larry Holmes, Ken Norton, Earnie Shavers, Sonny Liston, he simply had so many more MUCH tougher opponents than Rocky Marciano.
It's the same with Napoleon. When you look closely at what Napoleon accomplished, he turned around seemingly lost battles, like Marengo and Wagram, he was able to pull off impossibly clean victories against larger forces commanded by as accomplished men as himself, like when he surrounded General Mack's 45 000 man army with 30 000 men because he knew that Mack would fall for a distraction and not move from his position and Napoleon was able to dangerously split his men and surround him, winning a battle against a larger force without firing a shot (Mack surrendered his 45 000 man army), or the time that Napoleon drew the combined Russian/Austrian force at Austerlitz into attacking his deliberately weakened flank, which was only saved by Davout's miraculous arrival after a 2 day forced march from Vienna, and the result of which caused so many territorial concessions from Austria that a 1000 year long empire, the Holy Roman Empire, effectively no longer existed and was dissolved by Francis I who was then only Emperor of Austria after that.
His military reforms now form the basis of the world's premier militaries: he invented the corps system, where a large army was divided into smaller armies that were self-sufficient and mobile and intended to be able to arrive to assist another corps after a single day of fighting, this allowed him to cover more ground, gather more supplies, acquire more accurate and complete intelligence on the enemy's position, and even pin them down for long enough for reinforcements to arrive and turn the tide. This allowed seemingly impossible feats such as the surrounding of Mack and the double victory of Jena-Auerstadt.
You could say "Yeah but Alexander the Great was never defeated. Hannibal set the record for the most men killed in a single day of combat for 2000 years. Genghis Khan took over almost the entire solar system" but it specifically declines to recognize just how much the odds were stacked against Napoleon for literally every major power in Europe to declare war on him, sometimes simultaneously, and still easily win victories against them.
U haven heard of Subotai my friend
2:06 Imagine if that goes farther and the movie ends with Napoleon bleeding out from getting impaled by a sword
From America I salute the Emperor Napoleon
Poor man you do know Wellington beat all the Marshalls sent against him and Napoleon at Waterloo And yet your military academies all studied a failure
@@jacktattis Is Wellington known for pioneering a code akin to the revolutionary progressive Napoleonic Code? Or is he simply known for being a killer dressed in uniform like all other soldiers?
@@dnpjj I have no idea but he certainly stuffed your hero in a grand fashion
@@jacktattis All wellington had to do was wait for Marshal Soult to stop pillaging the countryside and show up for a battle, the french troops in spain were demoralized, hungry and dying by the dozen through diseases alone, he also ran away from spain with his army when he was losing
Vive l'Empereur , vive la grande Armée et gloire à la France éternelle ✊✊👍
👍👌
♥️♥️♥️👍👍👍
Ça me fait rire tous ces gens qui disent vive l'empereur.
Aujourd'hui les français sont tous égoïste en ne pensant qu'à eux .
C'est toujours "ma liberté , mes droits ...." mais bizarrement j'entend jamais " pour mon pays "
Franchement j'aimerai bien que demain que il y ait une vrai guerre que la conscription soit relancé pour voir le nombre réel de volontaire prêt à mourir à pour la France.
Perso je suis sur que la très très grande majorité de français aujourd'hui refuseront de se battre et iront faire leur sport favori , manifesté dans la rue pour dire qui veulent pas se battre parce qu'ils ont piscine ou le bac blanc à bosser 😂😂
@@emmanuel3490 slt mec , pour info j'ai donné 10 ans de ma vie à la France , j'ai servi dans la Marine Nationale , j'ai fait 2 conflits , j'ai représenté la France dans les nombreux pays que j'ai pû visiter .
Belle journée à toi 👍
Le soldat il s évanoui, Napoléon a le fluide royale, ça lui va tellement bien 🤣🤣😍😍🇫🇷🇫🇷✨✨
A great movie!🇫🇷
Name of this movie?
Napoleon to przykład tego że silny, przywódca to silny Naród!!!
My w naszym kraju też takiego mieliśmy
Józef Piłsudski 🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱
Bonaparte to Legenda ❤️
że jak? Bonaparte to Legenda, ale jak najbardziej negatywna. Tylu ludzi co zginęło pod jego rozkazami...
@@KanTrocero Liberals Fak q of
Nie porównuj wielkiego rewolucjonisty z kontrrewolucjonistą, którego przed upadkiem ocalił tylko CUD
*Napoleon Returns*
Entire French Army: We're so back :DDD
Waterloo: Prank em John
J'ai beaucoup aimé ce film mais à cause de son échec commercial (entre autres) on a jamais eu le potentiel masterpiece de Kubrick sur le sujet
Великий человек,хоть я русский и он воевал с нами я считаю его величайшим человек в истории
Он мог бы стать "великим", если бы не погибали другие люди?
Суворов с Кутузовым на небе : " И зачем нам такие потомки"
Нельзя не согласиться.Величайший.Во всём.
What's incredible is that this didn't happen just once. It happened several times
The equivalent scene in Ridley Scott's version looked like a parody.
Agree
01:30
Poorly trained soldiers.
The emperor himself orders them to shoot, and they faint.
They were a combination of new recruits and veterans, the latter, who, coincidentally, once served under Napoleon's command. The recruits were too frightened or intimidated, whereas the veterans respected and honoured their once-exiled commander. The common soldier and officer alike couldn't bring themselves to bear of shooting the same commander that gloriously lead them to victory for many years.
@@tavariskaiser6742
conditioned or acquired reflex
And a touch of "Well, I'm not going to be the first one to pull a trigger!"
@@donwild50 good solder doesn't thing
Napoleon: Want to do it a second time, boys?
French soldiers: HELL YEAH!
Longa vida ao grande Imperador Napoleão.
No doubt that his real name is Napoleon D. Bonaparte with such a haki
Haha
What people today don’t understand about Napoleon is that the French Army of the coalition wars was different from other armies. Most European armies of the time consisted of a combination of serfs (or semi-serfs) and mercenaries, with the officers drawn from the ranks of the nobility who owned the land worked by those serfs.
The French army also consisted of peasants, but those peasants were free landowners who owned the soil they worked, and the officers of that army weren’t aristocrats, but also the sons of peasants whose families owned the soil they worked on. They might be peasants, but they felt like lords, and in a way they were. More, the war they were fighting secured their own property, if France expanded, their own families‘ wealth might expand; if the Coalition won, it wouldn‘t and worst case they might have to become serfs again.
As a result, this army was extremely motivated and well-led, and Napoleon personifies the qualities of that Army. Moreover, to the vast majority of people, he personified a stare of affairs where not only was France powerful, but they themselves were personally free and (relatively) wealthy. That‘s why he was worshipped like a god even a century after his death, and that‘s the crucial difference between the last French Kings, and the first French Emperor.
Longue vie à l'empereur