We in the UK have no real idea of gun ownership on the scale the Americans have. We have always had strict laws governing gun ownership but even then we have had gun related deaths. The Americans have basically always had guns, their constitution has the 2nd Amendment, guaranteeing the right to bear arms. I don’t think it’s possible in America to deny guns to the criminal element so any gun ban only affects the law abiding. Two different countries. Two different gun cultures.
I don't think you've researched this topic or know what your talking about. the second amendment was never meant to give individual rights to own guns. The corrupt lobby, a right wing Supreme Court and the NRA constantly push, pay off and promote anti gun legislation and propaganda that pushes the idea that gun laws and bans don't work. When the assault weapon ban was in effect for 10 years, mass shootings went way down and then rose back up when it was lifted. This proves gun bans DO work but the Republicans and the Supreme Court refuse to implement anoth3r federal ban. Other countries with mental health issues don't have mass shootings daily due to their absent gun culture and strict legisaltions. The UK may have a few gun related deaths but nowhere near the level in the United States. It's asinine and ignorant to say to never have bans or even gun laws because the criminals will still get the weapons.
We say the Germans love their cars, the Americans can go on about all this BS about protecting their "family"...the main reason is , they love their guns.
@@whentherebelcomeshome7564 if nobody has a gun, you intentionally weaken people. People aren't only attacked by other people with guns. They're attacked by far more things.
@@whentherebelcomeshome7564 Well, You're out of line but you're right, If i had guns, I would definitely hand over my guns if it meant no children, man or woman will have to get hurt again..but its not gonna happen, me giving up my guns will not prevent people from getting hurt since im not the one out here shooting people for no reason.
Countries with the Highest Rates of Violent Gun Death (Homicides) per 100k residents in 2019 El Salvador - 36.78 Venezuela - 33.27 Guatemala - 29.06 Colombia - 26.36 Brazil - 21.93 Bahamas - 21.52 Honduras - 20.15 U.S. Virgin Islands - 19.40 Puerto Rico - 18.14 Mexico - 16.41
Top 10 Countries with Highest Gun Ownership (Civilian guns owned per 100 people): United States - 120.5 Falkland Islands - 62.1 Yemen - 52.8 New Caledonia - 42.5 Serbia - 39.1 (tie) Montenegro - 39.1 (tie) Uruguay - 34.7 (tie) Canada - 34.7 (tie) Cyprus - 34 Finland - 32
Semiautomatic shotguns can fire as fast as one can pull the trigger, yes. However, high capacity magazines for such shotguns do not exist as far as I’m aware. Most aren’t even box magazine fed but have an internal tube magazine that can only fit a finite amount of shells. Five or six at most. Maybe some can fit more, idk. So, yes, you can say rate of fire is whatever, but it’s not realistically achievable because of loading/reloading constraints.
Lol that’s the most stupid comment I have ever heard. A psyco with a knife is 1000 times less dangerous than the same one with a fucking semi-automatic rifle. So what the hell are you even talking about.
@hauntingjulio thatl start with less government intervention. It's the combination of government and corporations working together to fk literally every small business owner and employee over. If employees want more wage they import cheaper workers, if a small company doesn't blow up growth wise too fast or with new innovative technology bigger corporations in that field will try to beat out competitors creating a monopoly, although monopolies are illegal if you fund both political parties theyl look the other way until news media put you on blast. When that happens your company breaks up but you still own it so essentially it does nothing but create the illusion of competition.
Fun fact for you, the top 48 killers for the United States are all food and health related deaths. Which just to number 48, is over 40 million deaths. Number 47 is people falling, with 200 thousand people dying from falling. Number 50 is people dying in motor vehicle accidents at 190 thousand. And then finally, number 52 is gun related deaths including suicides with 180 thousand recorded deaths. Then the entire rest of the list is medically related and food related. From 52 all the way to 100. All but 3 of the top 100 killers in our country are caused by poor health and poor food. Should it be illegal to be fat and unhealthy?
But he did answer the question he brought up statistics by the FBI and CDC. Piers morgan made false statements and this guy countered them. Just because you don’t like his answer doesn’t mean he didn’t answer them
@@TariqKhan-xt5qsthe question was how is kinder eggs illegal because of safety but firearms are not illegal? Show me the answer, yes he stated the statistics math guy, but why? Firearms are the reason the sandy hooks and everything happened, not kinder eggs dummy, why are they still legal after all those shootings? Show me his answer, tag the time
Ah yes the UK... where knife bans have worked a treat and you get 2 years in jail for calling a horse gay. Yes a shining example of why we should ban guns
7,390 of all traffic accidents, involved a driver who was under the influence in 2019 here in America, resulting in 505 deaths, and 1944 injuries. Piers, are you willing to give up alcohol and your car, in the name of alcohol and car violence. I assume you are a responsible user of both, but should we take that privilege away because of some reckless behavior of others?
What makes this even funnier is the UK is one of the safest countries to drive and alcohol is culturally more prevalent/the drinking age is lower. The US is a broken & failed state.
@@Mondaysunday24I wouldn't say a failed state, life is actually pretty good over here, all the mass shootings are actually the exception. But we do have our problems, many infact. We should learn to love each other, not hate each other
Your a idiot you can't take away the means when there are more guns then people in the US and criminals don't follow laws and get there guns off the street and they do have guns in England but only the criminals have them people in the US have a 2nd amendment right to bear arms to protect us from a tyrannical government and people are not just gonna give up there guns its not gonna happen ......
@@jakobedonald8586 Ok so let's do it like this, you want to kill people and you choose to to walk into a building/street with lots of people and kill as many people as you can before you get taken down, which weapon would you rather have? A knife or a gun?
Exactly, we shouldn't dictate how the Brits run their country, they shouldn't do the same. It's ok to have an opinion on the matter, but don't voice it as if you are completely right, voice it as an opinion.
I always love asking gun ban enthusiasts to explain the failure of prohibition and drug bans, but how telling outlaws they cant have guns because we have them outlawed will work and watching them tuck their tails and run.
Easy: it’s about reducing, not bringing it to zero. No one in their right mind will think a ban on drugs or anything will bring related incidents to 0. But it’s makes it harder and happen at a smaller scale.
@@mrphil2159 It does nothing. Before the ink dries on the ban paper the criminals have already set up their new contacts. Seriously? You actually think a ban makes things harder and happen o n a smaller scale? I was dealing with law enforcement on a trip to Tennessee years ago talking about the drug empires and illegal drugs, banned, are one of the most profitable businesses out there. Drugs are trafficked and sold readily anywhere. The only thing your little bannies do is make law abiding decent citizens like me have to pay more or be prevented from legally obtaining a gun. I worked with a convicted felon on a job two years ago and he told me "I get all them guns, but I get em off the street cuz they're cheaper. I can get anything I want. Bans and buy backs are the biggest joke and criminals laugh the hardest.
As a American i would say if you are not living in this country then why should it matter to you what we do or what iur laws are. Worry about all the stabbings that occurred last year alone in the United Kingdom.
UK is above Czech on the world freedom index by the way so maybe get your facts correct before typing. Also its unfair to compare to Switzerland or nordic countries as they’re basically utopias lmao
@@sirgo0se97 Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha that is a good one. You can ask Tommy Robinson about "freedom" in UK. That government doesn't even trust the people with common handguns. Compare to Czech Rep. that has 600 year old tradition of commoners posses and carry all sort of firearms. Longer than ANY country on the globe. It's why so easily repelled Crusaders that had only cold arms and "shining armor", more than once. With the exception of short period recently when France and Britain sold Czechoslovakia to Hitler despite signed Defence Treaty. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_Czech_Republic#:~:text=In%20the%20Czech%20Republic%2C%20firearms,having%20a%20clean%20criminal%20record.
Ranking of Countries by Quality of Democracy..University of of Wurzburg. Rate from the "FULL" (or "Working") democratic countries to the least in this group beginning with Denmark and ending with Barbados at no.34. (The UK takes the place 17). The next group is the so-called "FLAWED" (or "Deficient") democratic countries with Israel at no.35 ending with Liberia which is at the end of this list at no.81. The USA is amongst this group. It is placed at no.1. (The next group would be the "Hybrid" democracies starting with Kenya) So all-in-all, the USA proudly takes place no. 36 in these 2 groups. You will find other tables (CNBC, Politics Stack Exchange, The Guardian, Vanderbilt University, Harvard Kennedy School etc etc) which differ, but they all have one thing in common.The UK is placed approx. no.18 as a "FULL" democracy, The USA is placed at approx. no.30 as a "FLAWED" democracy. Look up the differences between ""full" (or "working") and "flawed" (or "deficient") and why this is so. The USA...land of the Free. I suggest Americans who think this is all BS, open your eyes and inform yourselves.
France has higher homicide rates than the UK. Germany has less than both of them. But I wouldn't like to live in some districts of London or Glasgow, Paris or Marseilles, Frankfurt or Berlin. PS Regarding the Czech Republic, it is regarded (along with the USA) as a "flawed" democracy...the UK, despite the problems it has, as a "working" democracy.
You should do research before making such an ill-informed assumption. Contrary to popular belief there are requirements you have to meet to buy a gun, you have to be 18 (or 21 for a handgun) then have a least 200-1000 USD wait on your federally required FBI background check (NICS) to be done sign a 4473, then you might get a gun as a gun store can still refuse a sale. Seriously if you think it is that easy go buy one.
Piers got owned here. This guy was prepared with facts but i think it was too soon. People are emotional can process his facts. Maybe should have waited.
Northeastern states with strong laws end up victims of the infamous “iron pipeline,” the route traffickers use to bring guns up from southeastern states with weak laws. The evidence tells a simple story about porous borders: Out of all guns showing up at crime scenes after crossing state lines, four out of five come from states that lack good background check laws. Notable strong law states like Illinois and Maryland remain plagued with high gun violence in their biggest cities-in large part because they’re targeted by traffickers. Indeed an outsized share of likely trafficked crime guns recovered in Illinois begin their journey in states with weak laws. And Virginia, which had weak gun purchase laws until 2020, has long been the top supplier of crime guns into Maryland. At the other end of the scale, states like New Hampshire, Vermont, and Rhode Island have unusually low gun death rates compared with their somewhat weaker policies, in part because they are buffered by robust laws among other states in the region.
Yes, to be rude, distort facts and yell at his own guests to shut up when they are talking and he cant accept the fact that we know more than he does. Cockroaches have a purpose too, and so do maggots.
I know a guy I used to work with who’s daughter was killed by her partner with her own gun and his second daughter committed suicide with a gun BUT STILL DEFENDS GUNS BEING THAT READILY AVAILABLE!!! MAKE THIS MAKE SENSE!!!
I know a guy who eats his dinner with a KNIFE and fork, yet his neighbour was stabbed by a knife in a house robbery and his mate cut his finger while opening a crisp packet, but the guy continues to eat with a knife! HOW DOES THAT MAKE SENSE?
Knives have a number of normal purposes for example cutting vegetables/meat/other things when cooking dinner. The primary purpose of this item is not to kill even though it can be used to. A gun has one real purpose and one purpose only. To kill something. Let's put it another way; if tomorrow we banned guns, most people would have no change to their daily lives, on the other hand if we ban knives then we suddenly lose a lot of other functionality. This is just a rehash of the vehicle death argument. Same point same flaws.@@namelastname8872
This guy is aweful. Paris attacks, the argument was referring to Uk gun crimes. Hes uses one example in another country co paring it to one mass shooting every week on average across america. His arguments are flawed, unsubstantiated and weak.
1:50 i have a lego book and it says that in the older pirate sets, the small canons could throw a round 1x1 block but those small lego canon had to be unfunctional to avoid kids choking on the block, but they won’t restrict guns, kind of ironic
UK shouldnt be talking about US weapon politics bc of a lack of experience, we should talk about how there is no well equip citizen in the UK to take down an armed gunman… with a gun. we have plenty of good citizen shootings that kill a potential mass shooter, but the media doesnt want to talk about that.
The UK doesn’t need guns to take down a mass shooter because almost nobody has guns. Most criminals don’t use them because access isn’t as free as in the US. Hence no guns needed. The problem of the US is that they think they need guns to protect themselves. But by using guns to do that every unstable or evil person can have a gun, too. You see the issue here?
Since when were citizens supposed to take out gunmen? That’s the job of law enforcement. Not to mention of course the UK lacks experience, because we don’t have school shootings every couple of weeks.
@@mrfoxly6833 "Since when were citizens supposed to take out gunmen? That’s the job of law enforcement." Lol. Tell that to the thousands of people killed by gunmen because the police couldn't get there fast enough.
If you want to argue against the use of guns in a different country than yours than make sure you’re educated enough to make a solid argument that doesn’t fall apart with one sentence
The number of people killed with a knife in England and Wales in 2021/22 was the highest on record for 76 years. Around four in 10 homicides were committed using a knife or sharp instrument in the year to March 2022, some 282 in total.Feb 9, 2023.....just thinking if one had a gun those knife homicides rates would be way lower.
And thank God for that. It's pretty telling when the people who actually know anything about guns want to keep them, and the people who know nothing about them want to ban them. Try listening to a Democratic congress person argue against guns. They speak gibberish, because they are completely ignorant. And they're supposed to be the informed ones making the decisions. The average lib on the internet is even worse.
God I wish he was over here to talk some sense into these people they just sign a carry gun WITHOUT a permit in to law so anyone can just walk with a gun around here
what's wrong with that? Why should I need the governments permission to ensure I continue to exist? Why should I be beholden to the government for my life and my safety? Permits only exist to make it harder for normal people to own guns; far more people would have them if these permits didn't put people off of the idea. Your argument has no logic.
2 hot blooded guys had a heated spar. Scenario 1: they didn't have gun Scenario 2: both had guns How more likely the scenario 2 would result in death compared to scenario 1 ?
I believe we all should own multiple weapons. I carry at least four weapons with me at all times. For example, when I go shopping I always bring my bankcard, ID, along with my Dessert Eagle, rifle with laser scope and at least two 9mm Smith and Wesson pistols. I also like to wear my Trump hat.
Yeah, if they are properly educated on the topic, then sure hear em out. Same with us, unless we know what we are talking about, we shouldn't do the same
id like to have a discussion with him one day. hes comes off this morally high ground where he believes that hes right and no one else can have an opinion.
No one brought up the data on how many innocent lives were saved by law abiding people using guns for self defense. And the fact that states with the most restrictive gun control have the most gun violence.
I feel the need to clarify a few of his points, while yes all of his points verged on absolute nonsense, these are specifically bias wording or just 1. “Aimed rounds” and “firing rounds” are different. Most mass shooters don’t care about aim nor long term damage to their gun. The Firing Rate for an AR-15 actually maxes out at 2 rounds per second, meaning they can finish off a 30 round magazine in 15 seconds, and depending on reloading time, 100-120 rounds per minute . The entire purpose of using a gun like the AR-15 to barrage the crowd with bullets without the inconvenience of needing to aim. 2. When compared to other semi-automatic guns like hunting rifles, the bullets used in AR-15 cause significantly more damage to surrounding organs/tissue, leaving victims with a significantly higher chance of death. 3. I recognize it’s been a few years but wowee is he wrong. Gunshot wounds have been the leading cause in school age children and teen deaths in the US every year since 2020, coming in above car accidents, overdoses, anaphylaxis, cancers, starvation, etc. 4. The number he did provide in regards to deaths was purposefully misleading, sneaking in the modifier “accidental” when talking about the number of children killed. In reality, accidental firearm deaths only account for 4% of gun related deaths in children in 2021.
I'm only going to comment on your first two points 1. "The entire purpose of using a gun like the AR-15 to barrage the crowd with bullets without the inconvenience of needing to aim." Wouldn't you want a fully automatic weapon to barrage a crowd with bullets without having to aim? 2. "When compared to other semi-automatic guns like hunting rifles, the bullets used in the AR-15 cause significantly more damage to surrounding organs/tissues, leaving victims with a significantly higher chance of death." When you say "hunting rifle," what gun are you referring to? The word "hunting rifle" refers to a wide range of rifles, and if you actually knew anything about guns, you would know that the AR-15 is a rifle used for hunting. For your other statement, I'm assuming that when you say "significantly more damage to surrounding organs/tissues," you are referring to losing blood. Well, most people die from loss of blood when being shot by a gun instead of the initial gunshot, and let me tell you, most semi-automatic rifles used for hunting are more deadly than an AR-15.
After seeing all the school shootings in the US now, I would like to hear from Dan if his sentiments about this being "an Islamist" attack still stands true
@@Moose_King_05and how many mass shootings has Australia had since, also Australia remains on of the most free countries, guns I guess aren’t everything to them
@@TheEscapedSCPAustralia has actually had one or two since. Yes I know it's not a lot. But it has still happened. That being said, mass shootings were never a problem to begin with in Australia, so there was no need for extreme restrictions. Australia is a privileged country. It is far from free. An unarmed civilian population has absolutely no rights. Only privileges granted by an over reaching government. Nothing more.
@@Zripas I don't, what's your point? When other people complain about how I want to live my life that is when I complain, like trying to restrict my guns.
@@keonyang3332 Then be happy with daily mass shootings in your country. You wanted this, you can have it. Rest of the world will have perfect example of what happens when you give free rain over gun ownership.
@@Zripas I mean the rest of the not a perfect example more like a good example of a bad example. Also even in the US we don't have free rain over what firearms we can get, your ignorance speaks for itself .
@@keonyang3332 You literally have people with full army arsenal in their sheds just because they can buy as many guns as they want with little or no background checks... So yes, there is free rain over what firearms you can get. I could bet that you are not even aware that you can get gun in america legally without any background checks, right?
The American people has the constitution which has the 2nd Amendment, guaranteeing the rights to bear arms. This started right after we kicked the Brits butts and the reason is protect our right, live with with.
I was hoping when we sent Piers home he would concentrate on UK laws. See if you can ban knives and vans over there. We fought two wars so we wouldn't have to listen to Brits tell us how to live in the States.
Uk laws aren't in as such dire needs to be fixed unlike yours... The US OBVIOUSLY has a far worse gun problem than the UK, but not only that.. the US also has a worse knife problem than the UK... which a lot of you yanks tend to forget.
@@ChasingFeelzthe US overall has a worse violence problem, yes, almost entirely due to the prevalence and proliferation of gangs and cartels. Which our government helped fund and organize. But of course we shouldn't be armed. Our government wouldn't do anything bad right?
Piers kinder comparison is compelling. Those are directly marketed towards kids though & any a parent irresponsible enough to allow a child access to a firearm would most likely violate a gun control law.
Well not necessarily the child can use a firearm but that child has to prove that he/she is responsible to use one to the their parent like with a phone. That child can also use it for hunting and sporting (and if the event arises self defense), there was a 9 year old girl a few years ago that was professionally shooting for sport, that just goes for show that it's the person behind the gun not the gun itself.
@@keonyang3332 You misunderstood. I'm saying any parent negligent enough to leave a firearm easily accessible for a child is most likely not going to comply with regulations. What happened with the 9 yr old?
@@shelbyrybinski8519 Oh she wasn't 9 she was 10 from the news report (my were facts somewhat wrong) and she is doing pretty well I think she'll (Shyanne Roberts) be 18 this year from what I heard, could be wrong. (ua-cam.com/users/shyanneroberts)
@keonyang3332 I think you misinterpreted that I'm against kids being taught how to use firearms. I'm not lol. What I'm wondering is why you mention this girl. Did she use one for self-defense, sport, accident?
@@shelbyrybinski8519 sport, but my point is that if you teach a child about responsibility of an firearm we wouldn't need to worry to much about accidental discharges from a child.
This goes back to 1776. Brits will always envy American's freedom. Peter Ustinov, a British (of Russian background) said on AMERICAN national TV. "Yes, you have right to defend yourself - with a musket. That's how it was intended to be". 1) Not his Constitution, he's only British Subject with hardly any rights. 2) He was using TELEVISION, not goose quill, parchment and ink - “as it was intended to be”. 3) He forgot his King ended in the nuthouse in 1776.
@@shrekxrohankishibe We are just the opposite, we feel uncomfortable in areas with no guns. Remind us all those liberal "Gun Free Zones" where people die, like say WTC on 9/11. You said: "lot of us in Europe don’t consider owning a gun a “right”" Actually lot of us in Europe do. I came from European country that has the longest tradition of commoners owning and carrying guns, over 600 years, that's longer than any country on the planet.
We in the UK have no real idea of gun ownership on the scale the Americans have. We have always had strict laws governing gun ownership but even then we have had gun related deaths.
The Americans have basically always had guns, their constitution has the 2nd Amendment, guaranteeing the right to bear arms. I don’t think it’s possible in America to deny guns to the criminal element so any gun ban only affects the law abiding. Two different countries. Two different gun cultures.
Right on.
I don't think you've researched this topic or know what your talking about. the second amendment was never meant to give individual rights to own guns. The corrupt lobby, a right wing Supreme Court and the NRA constantly push, pay off and promote anti gun legislation and propaganda that pushes the idea that gun laws and bans don't work. When the assault weapon ban was in effect for 10 years, mass shootings went way down and then rose back up when it was lifted. This proves gun bans DO work but the Republicans and the Supreme Court refuse to implement anoth3r federal ban. Other countries with mental health issues don't have mass shootings daily due to their absent gun culture and strict legisaltions. The UK may have a few gun related deaths but nowhere near the level in the United States. It's asinine and ignorant to say to never have bans or even gun laws because the criminals will still get the weapons.
We say the Germans love their cars, the Americans can go on about all this BS about protecting their "family"...the main reason is , they love their guns.
@@mikefraser4513 protecting their family is part of the reason but yes we love our guns, 'merica.
@@mikefraser4513What he said! ☝️☝️
This guy's shifty eyes are killing me.
eyes to right is innovative answer and to the left are lying ones. You are RIGHT!!!!. its not a debate its about gun money business
See, then Obama's body guards just need couple of those with shifty eyes". No need for slingshots.
Lmfao he really does !! 😂
If nobody has a gun nobody can be killed by a gun.
And no one can defend themselves with one either. Leaving people vulnerable and in more danger.
@@Moose_King_05 IF NOBODY HAS A GUN ...
@@whentherebelcomeshome7564 if nobody has a gun, you intentionally weaken people. People aren't only attacked by other people with guns. They're attacked by far more things.
@@Moose_King_05OK. What do You think? Would there be less people killed by guns if nobody had a gun?
@@whentherebelcomeshome7564 Well, You're out of line but you're right, If i had guns, I would definitely hand over my guns if it meant no children, man or woman will have to get hurt again..but its not gonna happen, me giving up my guns will not prevent people from getting hurt since im not the one out here shooting people for no reason.
wow this is six years old and were already in a bloodbath at the beginning of 2023.
As a European, I would just say an American just being an American
And European being European. Always asking Americans for help with their guns. Every war.
@@1stsampan Which war? There aren't any wars in Europe except Ukraine and Russia
@@gamingwithcyt3925 You must be living in igloo if you never heard of WW I, WW II or the Balkans war. BTW,. there's no war in Russia. Last was WW II.
@@1stsampan Are you actually dumb? WW2 ended just short of 80 years ago when we still had guns in UK
@@1stsampan There is a war in russia and ukraine LMAO
Any restriction of the individual right to self defense is complicity with the attacker.
Piers so want to pull his hair and slap him 🤣🤣
"Choking on candy is one of the top five causes of childhood mortality in the USA . . . . "
Then stop feeding your kidds so much goddam candy!!
Countries with the Highest Rates of Violent Gun Death (Homicides) per 100k residents in 2019
El Salvador - 36.78
Venezuela - 33.27
Guatemala - 29.06
Colombia - 26.36
Brazil - 21.93
Bahamas - 21.52
Honduras - 20.15
U.S. Virgin Islands - 19.40
Puerto Rico - 18.14
Mexico - 16.41
Puerto Rico isn't exactly a country, but your point is made.
Top 10 Countries with Highest Gun Ownership (Civilian guns owned per 100 people):
United States - 120.5
Falkland Islands - 62.1
Yemen - 52.8
New Caledonia - 42.5
Serbia - 39.1 (tie)
Montenegro - 39.1 (tie)
Uruguay - 34.7 (tie)
Canada - 34.7 (tie)
Cyprus - 34
Finland - 32
@@Stuff857 what is your point? We have less gun related deaths then others. Plus I like collecting.
@@Stuff857 Well, not all Americans have guns...some have 2 or 3.
@@mikefraser4513
But assuming 2a gets used for the intended purpose, they can pass them to neighbours.
Did this guy actually say that a hunting shotgun can shoot 60 rounds a minute? Where can I get one of those?
30 people with 2 shot per shotguns duh !!!!! simply maths !!!!
Any modern semi automatic shotgun can do it he’s obviously not talking about your grandpas pump
Semiautomatic shotguns can fire as fast as one can pull the trigger, yes. However, high capacity magazines for such shotguns do not exist as far as I’m aware. Most aren’t even box magazine fed but have an internal tube magazine that can only fit a finite amount of shells. Five or six at most. Maybe some can fit more, idk. So, yes, you can say rate of fire is whatever, but it’s not realistically achievable because of loading/reloading constraints.
No, he said a semi automatic hunting rifle.
@@super_happy_alien509 🤣brilliant post....made me chuckle
Man, this guy is good. Of course, he is going up against Piers Morgan.
You’re right! Good at whataboutism and dog whistles.
good at what....?
@@gibsonrickenbacker6317 Simpleton.
A couple of guys broke into my house last week armed with candy-bars. (Mine was locked-up)
@@jeddiajones4570good at bullshiting
If people want to stop mass shootings, start with the heart and mind, not the gun
Probably less poverty in the US would probably help that
Lol that’s the most stupid comment I have ever heard. A psyco with a knife is 1000 times less dangerous than the same one with a fucking semi-automatic rifle. So what the hell are you even talking about.
well the nashville shooter was dismissed from the military FOR MENTAL HEALTH and still LEGALY purchased the 7 guns they then used against a school
@hauntingjulio thatl start with less government intervention. It's the combination of government and corporations working together to fk literally every small business owner and employee over. If employees want more wage they import cheaper workers, if a small company doesn't blow up growth wise too fast or with new innovative technology bigger corporations in that field will try to beat out competitors creating a monopoly, although monopolies are illegal if you fund both political parties theyl look the other way until news media put you on blast. When that happens your company breaks up but you still own it so essentially it does nothing but create the illusion of competition.
or maybe take away the guns because shootings are caused by guns. not obvious enough?!?!
32k gun deaths, with context or otherwise, is too much.
Fun fact for you, the top 48 killers for the United States are all food and health related deaths. Which just to number 48, is over 40 million deaths. Number 47 is people falling, with 200 thousand people dying from falling. Number 50 is people dying in motor vehicle accidents at 190 thousand. And then finally, number 52 is gun related deaths including suicides with 180 thousand recorded deaths. Then the entire rest of the list is medically related and food related. From 52 all the way to 100. All but 3 of the top 100 killers in our country are caused by poor health and poor food. Should it be illegal to be fat and unhealthy?
True but most of em are "self deletions," so um yeah.
2/3rds of those are suicide.
80% of the 1/3rd are gang violence.
Would you prefer suicide disembowelment Japanese style?
most are pistols not even rifles
Let’s be real here I don’t Stan for peirs but bring him to America and debate these people
He was basically doing that on CNN
my man didnt even answer the questions, he was just rumbling around with kids choking on toys and suicide when the interview is about guns 😅
Typical Republican.
But he did answer the question he brought up statistics by the FBI and CDC. Piers morgan made false statements and this guy countered them.
Just because you don’t like his answer doesn’t mean he didn’t answer them
@@TariqKhan-xt5qsthe question was how is kinder eggs illegal because of safety but firearms are not illegal? Show me the answer, yes he stated the statistics math guy, but why? Firearms are the reason the sandy hooks and everything happened, not kinder eggs dummy, why are they still legal after all those shootings? Show me his answer, tag the time
He seemed like probably the worst person to debate this.
@@jackkrauss yeah its hard to debate a pro gun campaigner, ofcos he’s gonna go against it
Ah yes the UK... where knife bans have worked a treat and you get 2 years in jail for calling a horse gay. Yes a shining example of why we should ban guns
its impossible to ban knives...how would you work in a kitchen?!
but it IS possible to ban guns...or at least strengthen the laws ....
7,390 of all traffic accidents, involved a driver who was under the influence in 2019 here in America, resulting in 505 deaths, and 1944 injuries. Piers, are you willing to give up alcohol and your car, in the name of alcohol and car violence. I assume you are a responsible user of both, but should we take that privilege away because of some reckless behavior of others?
What makes this even funnier is the UK is one of the safest countries to drive and alcohol is culturally more prevalent/the drinking age is lower. The US is a broken & failed state.
Cars don’t go on mass killing sprees lad😂
@@Mondaysunday24I wouldn't say a failed state, life is actually pretty good over here, all the mass shootings are actually the exception.
But we do have our problems, many infact. We should learn to love each other, not hate each other
That's rather interesting. In 2021 48,830 people were killed by firearms according to CDC.
@ToTheMaxGaming1 you think guns shoot themselves 😅
excellent keep shouting eachother y`all
Here's an equation for you! if a "good guy with a gun" shoots another "good guy with a gun" how many "good guys" do you have left?
lol zero on more than one level. Nice one 👍
you're not smarter than a 5th grader !!!
this is over your head!!
"IF" asteroid hits the Earth you don't need gun control.
two Guys one with a gun wound
Susanna nailed it. Take away the means
Your a idiot you can't take away the means when there are more guns then people in the US and criminals don't follow laws and get there guns off the street and they do have guns in England but only the criminals have them people in the US have a 2nd amendment right to bear arms to protect us from a tyrannical government and people are not just gonna give up there guns its not gonna happen ......
So people can start stabbing in America?
Or hammering people to death?
@@jakobedonald8586 I've yet to hear of someone going into a church, school or club armed with a (or 2) knives, and cause a massacre.
@@jakobedonald8586 Ok so let's do it like this, you want to kill people and you choose to to walk into a building/street with lots of people and kill as many people as you can before you get taken down, which weapon would you rather have? A knife or a gun?
America Only country where Candy 🍭🍬 is more lethal than gun🤣
Welcome to America
😂
The campaigner looks like a horrible surprise you’ll find in Kinder egg chocolate. What a joke. He’s not even answering the questions
Dan did a good job trolling the troll!
My man looked like he hadn't slept in years
Ah yes, because criminals follow laws.
75-90% of the people who do mass shootings buy their guns legally. So yes
God, you know these guys are detached from reality when Piers Morgan of all people is talking more sense.
What right does piers actually have to get get involved with Americans and there politics 😂
Nice echo chamber their buddy
Exactly, we shouldn't dictate how the Brits run their country, they shouldn't do the same. It's ok to have an opinion on the matter, but don't voice it as if you are completely right, voice it as an opinion.
25,000 people die each year result of eating candy.
Trying to get this man to understand this ,is like trying to get Donald Trump to accept he did lose the 2020 election. he’ll never admit this…
True🤣
Also hilary clinton in 2016
Do you practice being a willfully ignorant simpleton?
*accept
@@chrisroberts2115 Thanks.corrected
Piers, "how many bullets, just for people who know nothing about guns" so clearly that'd include him 😂
Welcome to America
Counter argument with Knife🤪🤪... I stay in Philly, have to meet this legend.
Norway is not in the EU
the kinder egg vs gun should be enough to shut up any lunatic.
She had the freaking best arguments. Hats off to her!
He tore into Pierce and that other muppet, made them look bad in their own show XD
People need an ar-15 to hunt in case the deer fire back
That's how you know it's a "good" deer!🤣
Simpleton.
I came at me !!!!!!!!!!!!! it was self defence.
I always love asking gun ban enthusiasts to explain the failure of prohibition and drug bans, but how telling outlaws they cant have guns because we have them outlawed will work and watching them tuck their tails and run.
Gun ban has worked in Australia, that hasn't had a mass killing since.
Easy: it’s about reducing, not bringing it to zero. No one in their right mind will think a ban on drugs or anything will bring related incidents to 0. But it’s makes it harder and happen at a smaller scale.
@@mrphil2159 It does nothing. Before the ink dries on the ban paper the criminals have already set up their new contacts. Seriously? You actually think a ban makes things harder and happen o n a smaller scale? I was dealing with law enforcement on a trip to Tennessee years ago talking about the drug empires and illegal drugs, banned, are one of the most profitable businesses out there. Drugs are trafficked and sold readily anywhere.
The only thing your little bannies do is make law abiding decent citizens like me have to pay more or be prevented from legally obtaining a gun. I worked with a convicted felon on a job two years ago and he told me "I get all them guns, but I get em off the street cuz they're cheaper. I can get anything I want. Bans and buy backs are the biggest joke and criminals laugh the hardest.
@@iamjustsobody3991 Wikipedia says otherwise.
As a American i would say if you are not living in this country then why should it matter to you what we do or what iur laws are. Worry about all the stabbings that occurred last year alone in the United Kingdom.
You should also worry about stabbings. The homicide rate in the US is higher than the UK.
Why does UK have far less freedom and higher homicide rate than countries with great firearms freedom, like Czech Rep. or Switzerland?
UK is above Czech on the world freedom index by the way so maybe get your facts correct before typing. Also its unfair to compare to Switzerland or nordic countries as they’re basically utopias lmao
@@sirgo0se97 Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha that is a good one. You can ask Tommy Robinson about "freedom" in UK. That government doesn't even trust the people with common handguns. Compare to Czech Rep. that has 600 year old tradition of commoners posses and carry all sort of firearms. Longer than ANY country on the globe. It's why so easily repelled Crusaders that had only cold arms and "shining armor", more than once. With the exception of short period recently when France and Britain sold Czechoslovakia to Hitler despite signed Defence Treaty. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_Czech_Republic#:~:text=In%20the%20Czech%20Republic%2C%20firearms,having%20a%20clean%20criminal%20record.
@@1stsampan Well that is what happens when you talk to a goose. Lol
Ranking of Countries by Quality of Democracy..University of of Wurzburg.
Rate from the "FULL" (or "Working") democratic countries to the least in this group beginning with Denmark and ending with Barbados at no.34. (The UK takes the place 17).
The next group is the so-called "FLAWED" (or "Deficient") democratic countries with Israel at no.35 ending with Liberia which is at the end of this list at no.81. The USA is amongst this group. It is placed at no.1. (The next group would be the "Hybrid" democracies starting with Kenya) So all-in-all, the USA proudly takes place no. 36 in these 2 groups.
You will find other tables (CNBC, Politics Stack Exchange, The Guardian, Vanderbilt University, Harvard Kennedy School etc etc) which differ, but they all have one thing in common.The UK is placed approx. no.18 as a "FULL" democracy, The USA is placed at approx. no.30 as a "FLAWED" democracy.
Look up the differences between ""full" (or "working") and "flawed" (or "deficient") and why this is so.
The USA...land of the Free.
I suggest Americans who think this is all BS, open your eyes and inform yourselves.
France has higher homicide rates than the UK. Germany has less than both of them. But I wouldn't like to live in some districts of London or Glasgow, Paris or Marseilles, Frankfurt or Berlin. PS Regarding the Czech Republic, it is regarded (along with the USA) as a "flawed" democracy...the UK, despite the problems it has, as a "working" democracy.
answer straight, where are your eyes looking lmao
I dont agree that guns should be banned all together but it cant be as easy as getting guns as getting skittles
It’s not as easy
You should do research before making such an ill-informed assumption. Contrary to popular belief there are requirements you have to meet to buy a gun, you have to be 18 (or 21 for a handgun) then have a least 200-1000 USD wait on your federally required FBI background check (NICS) to be done sign a 4473, then you might get a gun as a gun store can still refuse a sale. Seriously if you think it is that easy go buy one.
its not at all as easy as going in to buy skittles bro 💀
Is it really that easy? Well probably in certain element but then it's probably easy to get other things too.
@@elijahreeves4890 I know I hate these analogies. Like buying skittles requires a background check lol.
Piers got owned here. This guy was prepared with facts but i think it was too soon. People are emotional can process his facts. Maybe should have waited.
The most deaths by firearms in the USA are Democrat states with the toughest gun laws
Northeastern states with strong laws end up victims of the infamous “iron pipeline,” the route traffickers use to bring guns up from southeastern states with weak laws. The evidence tells a simple story about porous borders: Out of all guns showing up at crime scenes after crossing state lines, four out of five come from states that lack good background check laws.
Notable strong law states like Illinois and Maryland remain plagued with high gun violence in their biggest cities-in large part because they’re targeted by traffickers. Indeed an outsized share of likely trafficked crime guns recovered in Illinois begin their journey in states with weak laws. And Virginia, which had weak gun purchase laws until 2020, has long been the top supplier of crime guns into Maryland. At the other end of the scale, states like New Hampshire, Vermont, and Rhode Island have unusually low gun death rates compared with their somewhat weaker policies, in part because they are buffered by robust laws among other states in the region.
No one give a shit were in the US people get shot ... it need to stop ,, everywere ..
"ignore the evidence and make your own"
@@tanner1122 different mentality.
Its amazing now in 2023 how lonf it took morgan to catch up
Ahh this is Pier’s purpose 😂
He's paid to say this, but I believe deep down he believes otherwise.
Yes, to be rude, distort facts and yell at his own guests to shut up when they are talking and he cant accept the fact that we know more than he does. Cockroaches have a purpose too, and so do maggots.
I'm not behind every thing he says, but here I am. I am Canadian, we have gun violence here but but not like the U.S.
Proud to be an American 🇺🇸 and not a anti gun, government lover Brit. 🇬🇧
I know a guy I used to work with who’s daughter was killed by her partner with her own gun and his second daughter committed suicide with a gun BUT STILL DEFENDS GUNS BEING THAT READILY AVAILABLE!!!
MAKE THIS MAKE SENSE!!!
I know a guy who eats his dinner with a KNIFE and fork, yet his neighbour was stabbed by a knife in a house robbery and his mate cut his finger while opening a crisp packet, but the guy continues to eat with a knife! HOW DOES THAT MAKE SENSE?
@@namelastname8872
Crisp packet? It’s called “bag of chips”
Youre from overseas… your comment doesn’t matter lol..
@peter187peter187 If the opinions of people from overseas don't matter to you, why are you watching a clip of "Good Morning Britain"?
@@namelastname8872 facts
Knives have a number of normal purposes for example cutting vegetables/meat/other things when cooking dinner. The primary purpose of this item is not to kill even though it can be used to. A gun has one real purpose and one purpose only. To kill something. Let's put it another way; if tomorrow we banned guns, most people would have no change to their daily lives, on the other hand if we ban knives then we suddenly lose a lot of other functionality.
This is just a rehash of the vehicle death argument. Same point same flaws.@@namelastname8872
The american guy sure moves his eys a lot
This guy is aweful. Paris attacks, the argument was referring to Uk gun crimes. Hes uses one example in another country co paring it to one mass shooting every week on average across america. His arguments are flawed, unsubstantiated and weak.
Same with yours. I don't see much of a difference.
@@keonyang3332 your comment doesnt make any sense
@@Heneling uhhh yeah, true. My point was pretty much "don't give up your guns" but yeah I commented on the wrong comment
I can't be trusted with guns, end of. Simply cannot be trusted. Think I'll stick to Kinder Eggs.
Bro looked around him like a cartoon character trying to tell a lie 😭
1:50 i have a lego book and it says that in the older pirate sets, the small canons could throw a round 1x1 block but those small lego canon had to be unfunctional to avoid kids choking on the block, but they won’t restrict guns, kind of ironic
Legos do not have a right that shall not be infringed.
@@awakeningfaithTV neither do guns wdym
@@awakeningfaithTVyou know it’s an amendment
UK shouldnt be talking about US weapon politics bc of a lack of experience, we should talk about how there is no well equip citizen in the UK to take down an armed gunman… with a gun. we have plenty of good citizen shootings that kill a potential mass shooter, but the media doesnt want to talk about that.
The UK doesn’t need guns to take down a mass shooter because almost nobody has guns. Most criminals don’t use them because access isn’t as free as in the US. Hence no guns needed.
The problem of the US is that they think they need guns to protect themselves. But by using guns to do that every unstable or evil person can have a gun, too.
You see the issue here?
Since when were citizens supposed to take out gunmen?
That’s the job of law enforcement.
Not to mention of course the UK lacks experience, because we don’t have school shootings every couple of weeks.
@@mrfoxly6833 "Since when were citizens supposed to take out gunmen? That’s the job of law enforcement." Lol. Tell that to the thousands of people killed by gunmen because the police couldn't get there fast enough.
@@CheesecakeXIII That wouldn’t be a problem if the gunmen didn’t have guns to begin with.
You cannot argue with a pro gun apologist.
Sure about that? The anti guns ppI are the fooIs here though
If you want to argue against the use of guns in a different country than yours than make sure you’re educated enough to make a solid argument that doesn’t fall apart with one sentence
Someone called and complained to my job and said I looked real miserable out there
The number of people killed with a knife in England and Wales in 2021/22 was the highest on record for 76 years. Around four in 10 homicides were committed using a knife or sharp instrument in the year to March 2022, some 282 in total.Feb 9, 2023.....just thinking if one had a gun those knife homicides rates would be way lower.
Good point. I think the American did great in the interview.
England had conceal/carry permits for handguns until 1953 when they were banned!!
Or maybe way higher, since the perpetrator would also have a gun :)
You’re not going to change gun nuts, mind about anything involving firearms. There’s no point don’t even bother cause they’re not going to listen.
And thank God for that. It's pretty telling when the people who actually know anything about guns want to keep them, and the people who know nothing about them want to ban them. Try listening to a Democratic congress person argue against guns. They speak gibberish, because they are completely ignorant. And they're supposed to be the informed ones making the decisions. The average lib on the internet is even worse.
Jokes on you Piers, I can order as many Kinder Surprise Chocolate eggs as I want with the power of the internet. 🇺🇸
God I wish he was over here to talk some sense into these people they just sign a carry gun WITHOUT a permit in to law so anyone can just walk with a gun around here
In Arizona they can set at a bar with a gun on their hip. I never allowed that when I owned bars but it's not illegal. Ridiculous
He never answer a single question.
you're a fool !!
@@pepsiwarren2957 Drunk people in a bar carrying guns. What could possibly go wrong?
what's wrong with that? Why should I need the governments permission to ensure I continue to exist? Why should I be beholden to the government for my life and my safety? Permits only exist to make it harder for normal people to own guns; far more people would have them if these permits didn't put people off of the idea. Your argument has no logic.
I fucked my knee but I was down to 170 lbs and a five minute mile
What planet is that gay on. America will never learn.
2 hot blooded guys had a heated spar.
Scenario 1: they didn't have gun
Scenario 2: both had guns
How more likely the scenario 2 would result in death compared to scenario 1 ?
So I'm supposed to give up my firearms because someone else might get into a heated argument?
I believe we all should own multiple weapons. I carry at least four weapons with me at all times. For example, when I go shopping I always bring my bankcard, ID, along with my Dessert Eagle, rifle with laser scope and at least two 9mm Smith and Wesson pistols. I also like to wear my Trump hat.
Moron.
Is this serious?
@@Paul-wz7xp No, he's a moron.
No it's not serious
Why not outfit your vehicle with M2 and probably have a Javelin just in case you want to kill a tank as well as lots of humans???
As a euro I agree guns should DBE allowed
Piers Morgan is right why can they get these guns! Unreal the gaslighting! It’s just common sense
Modified with a bump stock, it can fire 400 rounds per minute or more
😂 with the right paperwork and paid taxes… its even more!!!
Zero.
except those are illegal. Everywhere in the states.
@@twlowe19 so are shootings
@2:46 exactly.
The Brits love to conflate correlation with causation
It’s always funny when people who aren’t Americans wanna talk American politics and have no clue what they are talking about
Yeah, if they are properly educated on the topic, then sure hear em out.
Same with us, unless we know what we are talking about, we shouldn't do the same
id like to have a discussion with him one day. hes comes off this morally high ground where he believes that hes right and no one else can have an opinion.
Bullshit. So does the small dicked, cowardly gun lover.
Which one?
@@Woodbug-b7t the tub of lard with the jowels.
@@keekwai2I call bullshit
Reid is looking fine.
Just the comment I'm looking for
One time agree with piers strongly
Ar-15 is 700-900 rpm
They ban SWEETS and they allow GUNS.
Tell me again how forward-thinking and advanced USA are...
No one brought up the data on how many innocent lives were saved by law abiding people using guns for self defense. And the fact that states with the most restrictive gun control have the most gun violence.
DISGUSTING gun rules
what rules?
When Piers was still a Journalist
I feel the need to clarify a few of his points, while yes all of his points verged on absolute nonsense, these are specifically bias wording or just
1. “Aimed rounds” and “firing rounds” are different. Most mass shooters don’t care about aim nor long term damage to their gun. The Firing Rate for an AR-15 actually maxes out at 2 rounds per second, meaning they can finish off a 30 round magazine in 15 seconds, and depending on reloading time, 100-120 rounds per minute . The entire purpose of using a gun like the AR-15 to barrage the crowd with bullets without the inconvenience of needing to aim.
2. When compared to other semi-automatic guns like hunting rifles, the bullets used in AR-15 cause significantly more damage to surrounding organs/tissue, leaving victims with a significantly higher chance of death.
3. I recognize it’s been a few years but wowee is he wrong. Gunshot wounds have been the leading cause in school age children and teen deaths in the US every year since 2020, coming in above car accidents, overdoses, anaphylaxis, cancers, starvation, etc.
4. The number he did provide in regards to deaths was purposefully misleading, sneaking in the modifier “accidental” when talking about the number of children killed. In reality, accidental firearm deaths only account for 4% of gun related deaths in children in 2021.
I'm only going to comment on your first two points 1. "The entire purpose of using a gun like the AR-15 to barrage the crowd with bullets without the inconvenience of needing to aim." Wouldn't you want a fully automatic weapon to barrage a crowd with bullets without having to aim? 2. "When compared to other semi-automatic guns like hunting rifles, the bullets used in the AR-15 cause significantly more damage to surrounding organs/tissues, leaving victims with a significantly higher chance of death." When you say "hunting rifle," what gun are you referring to? The word "hunting rifle" refers to a wide range of rifles, and if you actually knew anything about guns, you would know that the AR-15 is a rifle used for hunting. For your other statement, I'm assuming that when you say "significantly more damage to surrounding organs/tissues," you are referring to losing blood. Well, most people die from loss of blood when being shot by a gun instead of the initial gunshot, and let me tell you, most semi-automatic rifles used for hunting are more deadly than an AR-15.
I think 34k/year is too low. We should ramp it up to several hundred thousands to cleanse our society from undesirables.
Exactly what Nazis thought... So you do you, just keep rest of the world out of it.
After seeing all the school shootings in the US now, I would like to hear from Dan if his sentiments about this being "an Islamist" attack still stands true
What is the point for these liberal chancels where only the opposition is allowed to talk what a joke
so for guns to be legal helps the to decrease the crime?
Americas gun laws are shocking to me here in Australia. Thank his we changed our gun laws after 1 mass shooting in 1996 🙏😥
And you gave up all human rights and freedoms permanently.
@@Moose_King_05and how many mass shootings has Australia had since, also Australia remains on of the most free countries, guns I guess aren’t everything to them
@@TheEscapedSCPAustralia has actually had one or two since. Yes I know it's not a lot. But it has still happened. That being said, mass shootings were never a problem to begin with in Australia, so there was no need for extreme restrictions.
Australia is a privileged country. It is far from free.
An unarmed civilian population has absolutely no rights. Only privileges granted by an over reaching government. Nothing more.
AMERICANS DON'T EVER GIVE UP YOUR GUNS.
Then don't ever complain about mass shootings...
@@Zripas I don't, what's your point? When other people complain about how I want to live my life that is when I complain, like trying to restrict my guns.
@@keonyang3332
Then be happy with daily mass shootings in your country. You wanted this, you can have it. Rest of the world will have perfect example of what happens when you give free rain over gun ownership.
@@Zripas I mean the rest of the not a perfect example more like a good example of a bad example. Also even in the US we don't have free rain over what firearms we can get, your ignorance speaks for itself .
@@keonyang3332
You literally have people with full army arsenal in their sheds just because they can buy as many guns as they want with little or no background checks... So yes, there is free rain over what firearms you can get. I could bet that you are not even aware that you can get gun in america legally without any background checks, right?
Piers when he used to have his senses working perfectly 👌 look how he's turned into in 2024
That's like saying in the u s because of obesity should take away the food😂😂😂😂 2nd amendment for everyone
The American people has the constitution which has the 2nd Amendment, guaranteeing the rights to bear arms. This started right after we kicked the Brits butts and the reason is protect our right, live with with.
You mean Constitution drawn up in 1791. You people are backwards 🤪
The Brits still have their little feelings hurt because a group of Armed Hillbillies kicked their butts in 1776.
Hillbillies with a lot of French help.
Say we never had the right to arms then it’s going to be like uk knife killings every minute
Piers should stay out of American politics.
He has more sense than American politicians though.
American politics are pretty dumb tbh, not all the law and etc but most of it are dumb
With belt fed, 400 rpm cycle
Never heard of a belt-fed semi-automatic rifle
I was hoping when we sent Piers home he would concentrate on UK laws. See if you can ban knives and vans over there. We fought two wars so we wouldn't have to listen to Brits tell us how to live in the States.
Uk laws aren't in as such dire needs to be fixed unlike yours... The US OBVIOUSLY has a far worse gun problem than the UK, but not only that.. the US also has a worse knife problem than the UK... which a lot of you yanks tend to forget.
@@ChasingFeelz The UK has a much larger gun problem than the US because your citizens dont have any guns to defend themselves with. bahhh bahhhh
@@ChasingFeelzthe US overall has a worse violence problem, yes, almost entirely due to the prevalence and proliferation of gangs and cartels. Which our government helped fund and organize. But of course we shouldn't be armed. Our government wouldn't do anything bad right?
@@Moose_King_05 I think the general public being armed causes more harm than good... but that's just my opinion.
@@ChasingFeelz statistically incorrect and hundreds of millions of innocent people dead from their own governments is proof of that.
You can buy a kinder egg tho
Ya but toys are separated from the chocolate is not the same
Two anti British people on ITV have to go
Usa have gun shops on every corner it crazy
The British are coming
Tell the idiots to stay the hell home. We have enough morons here already.
It would be better
Piers kinder comparison is compelling. Those are directly marketed towards kids though & any a parent irresponsible enough to allow a child access to a firearm would most likely violate a gun control law.
Well not necessarily the child can use a firearm but that child has to prove that he/she is responsible to use one to the their parent like with a phone. That child can also use it for hunting and sporting (and if the event arises self defense), there was a 9 year old girl a few years ago that was professionally shooting for sport, that just goes for show that it's the person behind the gun not the gun itself.
@@keonyang3332 You misunderstood. I'm saying any parent negligent enough to leave a firearm easily accessible for a child is most likely not going to comply with regulations. What happened with the 9 yr old?
@@shelbyrybinski8519 Oh she wasn't 9 she was 10 from the news report (my were facts somewhat wrong) and she is doing pretty well I think she'll (Shyanne Roberts) be 18 this year from what I heard, could be wrong.
(ua-cam.com/users/shyanneroberts)
@keonyang3332 I think you misinterpreted that I'm against kids being taught how to use firearms. I'm not lol. What I'm wondering is why you mention this girl. Did she use one for self-defense, sport, accident?
@@shelbyrybinski8519 sport, but my point is that if you teach a child about responsibility of an firearm we wouldn't need to worry to much about accidental discharges from a child.
This goes back to 1776. Brits will always envy American's freedom. Peter Ustinov, a British (of Russian background) said on AMERICAN national TV. "Yes, you have right to defend yourself - with a musket. That's how it was intended to be". 1) Not his Constitution, he's only British Subject with hardly any rights. 2) He was using TELEVISION, not goose quill, parchment and ink - “as it was intended to be”. 3) He forgot his King ended in the nuthouse in 1776.
Not really. A lot of us in Europe don’t consider owning a gun a “right”
@@shrekxrohankishibe Indeed, lot of people feel good to be just subjects with no rights. And they do as they are told, by liberal media.
@@1stsampan nope. We genuinely don’t care about guns. In fact, most of us are quite uncomfortable in areas with guns
@@shrekxrohankishibe We are just the opposite, we feel uncomfortable in areas with no guns. Remind us all those liberal "Gun Free Zones" where people die, like say WTC on 9/11. You said: "lot of us in Europe don’t consider owning a gun a “right”" Actually lot of us in Europe do. I came from European country that has the longest tradition of commoners owning and carrying guns, over 600 years, that's longer than any country on the planet.
@@1stsampanSwitzerland was an influence on our forefathers for the Second Amendment!!
The smartest american 😂
The smartest woman 😂