The King of Kings' Speech [Bible slavery]
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 бер 2012
- So, who would most likely be responsible for Leviticus 25:44-46, a Lord of Love, or a demonic Satan? (Read on...)
---------------
website and blog: www.nonstampcollector.com
twitter: / nonstampnsc
BUY ME A COFFEE: www.buymeacoff.ee/nonstampNSC
PATREON: / nonstampcollector
-----------------
By their fruits shall ye know them: and think of how many thousands, or millions of lives have been utterly ruined by the fact that that passage exists in a piece of scripture that a whole bunch of people think has something to do with morality.
Slavery is just about the easiest human rights issue imaginable, and the bible gets it wrong. What an embarrassment. In fact, practically any human being who has ever been born and survived to the age of 8 or so could come up with a better and more ethical set of instructions on how to behave and run a society than the bible. It would not have ownership of PEOPLE as part of its core tenets.
Why did humanity have to wait thousands of years for the Emancipation Declaration? Couldn't Yahweh have delivered it himself? Couldn't Jesus? Peter? Paul? Nup - no one gave a shit about that sort of thing. Not when there were people keeping their foreskins, water to be walked on, and women speaking in churches!!
Script and music and performance and drawings etc (everything) by ME!!
If you haven't seen The King's Speech (Best picture Oscar winner, 2011), then you won't get this.
Sorry to the non-native English speakers or those who'd like to translate it - sometimes the ideas that come to me just don't lend themselves to subtitling or even voice-over.
---------------
website and blog: www.nonstampcollector.com
twitter: / nonstampnsc
-----------------
The Irony is that according the the bible, Lucifer had nothing to do with these commands. It was all according to Gods plan.
This is what the video is all about. an "all loving" god cannot be that rude (in the eyes of theists) so it must be the devil..... But most theists will say "out of context" even if the full context is given.
TheThore Given that there ever will be or ever was a context that slavery is ok. Makes me fucking sick someone can actually think in the modern day that Slavery is ok in some context. Disgusting. Obviously this was written by man to justify slavery. What other way to tell everyone that owning slaves is ok then saying it came from god, the moral authority that is always perfect!
Or they'll say "lOoK aT tHe OtHeR vErSeS" and that God made slavery slightly better... but almost all the versus are for the Israelite slaves only... not for the foreign slaves...
Or they'll just outright ignore the versus they don't like and continue saying "gOd NeVeR cOnDoNeS sLaVeRy" despite repeatedly quoting Exodus 21 and Leviticus 25:44-46 verbatim.
That's the whole point of the video.
You're not saying anything clever, you're just regurgitating something that was deliberately made obvious
@@JohnSmith-xf1zu If ever a well hidden nazi cult creeps from the shelters, and in their bible are instructions for gas chambers, they will justify it as a humane command, to be read in the context of industrial genocide, usually by burning people alive at the time. In that nazi bible, Eichmann would be the prophet of compassion, and IG Farben would be lead by angels.
Being a Christian doesn't give you the right to never have your religion made fun of, to ANY level of disrespect.
Well said.
“That which can be asserted with no evidence can be discarded with no evidence.”
Religion shouldn’t have privileged immunity, because religion is a truth claim.
Also keep up your great work.
Another way of putting it is 'the truth is more important than your right to not be offended'
@Urrcreavesh I like that too
Agreed. I will gladly accept their criticisms of atheism too
@Urrcreavesh Well *_I_* care about your feelings - our Lord Jesus Christ commands it of us Christians, the majority belief system, in our democracy
NonStampCollector, this “God” character of yours is completely inconsistent! In this video, he‘s trying to end slavery, but in other videos, he loves it. I’m beginning to suspect he isn’t real at all!
We just can't understand god's work
I'm loving this stereotypical comments
@@isaacnikolic3228 lmao.
You realize this is quoting the Bible right?
Yeah I think that’s what the message of the video and all the other videos nonstampcollector has made boils down too that god isn’t real and is inconsistent.
I think these videos are just overcompensation, but you know, deep down in your heart, you actually do collect stamps.
what does it mean to collect stamps? I speak english as a Second language.
It means exactly what it says. It's not an expression.
It's just a clever name to mock religious simpletons who claim that *atheism* is a *religion*. Therefore, according to this logic, NOT collecting stamps IS a hobby.
So, he is a NonStampCollector.
No AdHominem wow! Very clever. Just like his vids.
I do collect stamps, but only for the carbon. To keep that from entering the atmosphere. Never burnt any qurans or bibles, for the same reason.
No AdHominem Not collecting stamps is in the process of becoming an expression. Like "an offer you can't refuse" did in the 70's. When it evolved in a few years, from a salesman's lie, to a death threat.
How people look/read past this stuff and still maintain belief ....BLOWS.... MY....MIND....
Andrew C Well, most of them come up with some kind of excuse. Such as: "We don't follow the Old Testament". Some others try to justify these verses...
That's just the thing: they don't read it. They have isolated verses read to them on Sunday morning (no need for context there, naturally). They are spoonfed isolated verses in pre-printed bible study booklets on Wednesday night which give simplistic answers to leading questions so they will reach the conclusion the bible study leader wants them to reach. They buy crocheted and framed wall hangings with life-affirming verses on them. What extremely few Christians ever do is just sit down and read the Bible straight through, whole chapters at a time, with an eye to gaining even the most basic understanding of what all of it says.
So if they haven't read it or had it read to them, it will never challenge their beliefs.
Indoctrination can destroy the best of us, I remember reading all the horrible Quran verses and still stayed a believer until I evaluated everything
Most people don't look at it
Most people even don't know that there are such stuffs in bible, and some know but they say it's for ancient Israel lol
First christian: "I wonder why Jesus never condemned slavery?"
Second christian: "Are you crazy? He would have been crucified!"
(Rimshot)
Like Seneca was?
Yahweh's endorsement of slavery is only one of the many, many vile aspects of the Bible. Why anyone of conscience feels the need to use this as a book of moral instruction is beyond me.
Bible and Koran Cagematch!
We're still waiting for you to publish a better one
@@MarcillaSmith But for some reason, the author isn't returning our calls...
@@leyrua Physicians have a creed which is relevant here, and that is "do no harm." To wit: eliminating a book which derives its moral foundations from blood sacrifice, racism, genocide, slavery, murder, and vicarious atonement is already a step in the right direction without even the need to discuss its replacement (which, by the way, any basically sane and moral person could easily do).
@@dolnick7 Well, if there's any "basically sane and moral person" present who would care to discuss its replacement...
The cut to the angels reaction killed me lmao. I love them
live slug reaction 😂
•O•
These videos are very powerful. I cannot see how Christians could rebut them since you're directly quoting from the Bible.
They do, often. By saying things like:
"You're taking the bible out of context."
"Slavery at the time the Bible was written was not like the slavery of black people in America. They were more like servants and their owners HAD to treat them well."
"God undeestood that his people would change over the centuries. At the time, slavery was appropriate because they didn't have the sMe knowledge that we do today. God is wise."
These are the more common ones I've heard from Christian apologists. This isn't about logic or reasonable discourse. They fear death. Being wrong would mean they have to accept that they don't actually know for sure they will live forever. Maybe at least some of them feel that way.
damsra aus
you dont make sence ??????/
by the way this is problem for jewish becuase they believe whats written is put untell judment day
ahmad jundi2 what?
Usually with replys turned off
Don't forget that using the bible's passages are ways in which Lucifer tried to make Jesus fail his fast
You'd have to ask them, between texts, whether they think there are any cultural contexts in which owning slaves would be OK. Then smack over the head with Leviticus. OUCH!
You should do a video about Deuteronomy 22:28-29. This is the passage where the rapist gets to marry his victim.
It's even worse than we think. God knows everything, including the version NonStampCollector would make. Yet he still decided to divinely inspire this version. Amazing
I love this comment 😂 an all knowing God would know that people would question his authority when it cane to modern moral vs ancient barbaric practices 2000 years from now. And yet it seems to me that nowhere in the Bible does it mention that the old Testament is incorrect, especially since Jesus even said that he came to fulfill the law (referencing the old testament). You'd think that maybe he'd be helpful in everyday life if he's all knowing
Yea, considering the fact that many people consider the serpent who tempted Eve in the Garden of Eden was telling the truth about what the apples would do to them, whereas the YHWH lied about it and later admitted it, and considering he led them to intelligence whereas YHWH wanted to keep humans as dumb beasts, I'd say this is not what happened. Satan doesn't need to help YHWH to look like an asshole. He's doing just fine by himself.
I always wondered if the devil was actually the hero of the story, promoting free will and an education. Unfortunately God started slandering him after that... 🤔
If free will is impossible without allowing evil, and evil is defined as whatever God doesn't like... it reasonably follows that God doesn't like free will.
The only People who consider this are Militant Atheists who suffer Reading Comprehension. For one Thing, it is not said to be an Apple. For another, it was not "The Tree Of Knowledge", and they were not Dumb Beasts before partaking of it. It was The Tree Of The its result was Shame and Guilt, not"Intelligence".Which isn'teven the same as"Knowwledge"anyway.
As for God Lying, no, he didn't. The silly they didn't Die routine is idiotic given that They did eventually Die, and Evangelicals view them as Immortal prior to this and a Day need not be 1000 Years. There is also the Fact that Judicial Penalties can be Commuted. Which is the more Traditional View. You see, the Death Penalty was not something that just Automatically happened. Rather, it has to be applied. Just because God decided not to Kill them doesn;'t mean He Lied.
But these aren't Things I expect people here to grasp.
@@skwills1629 Sure, make it a fig, but the tree is still called the Tree of Knowledge. Meanwhile, the Christian god itself mentions in Genesis 3 as it faces the two humans that now they “must not be allowed to reach out... and take also from the Tree of Life and eat, and live forever.” (Genesis 3:22), so yes, the deity did lie, as it is essentially saying Adam and Eve would have lived forever if they ate from the Tree of Life, regardless of eating from the Tree of Knowledge, so the warning that they would surely die from eating from the Tree of Knowledge would be fallacious both by the sheer time it took for the two humans to die (for the thousand years a day apologetics, I would wonder why your deity had such a human conception of time while supposedly making the universe and commanded the humans to allocate one day and not a thousand years for the sabbath; it becomes even more ridiculous to imagine your deity needing a rest after spending its equivalent of like 1.42 seconds of its time making the whole universe; I sure wonder how it even communicated with humans with such a different conception of time so that the prophets listening to it would not straight up turn to ash from old age) and by the fact that even if we assume the fig or whatever caused them mortality, (which is not even certain because the deity only mentions what the snake mentioned, that humanity “has now become like one of [us (the Christian deity)], knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:22), as the direct consequence of eating the fruit), they could have counteracted the mortality from eating from the Tree of Life, so technically the most important cause of mortality would be them being banned from eating from that tree. In any other context, if you ingest a substance from
a bottle labeled “you will surely die if you drink this” as an 8-year-old kid and then you die like a hundred years later calmly in your sleep because the teacher forbade you from eating the green pill that supposedly will not make you die due to the contents of the bottle, just how seriously would you take the warning on that bottle? All the negative consequences besides knowledge that happened for Adam and Eve are conducted by the Abrahamic deity. One does not have to be a militant atheist to conclude that the piece of apologetics you presented that is more serpentine than the actual snake talking is fallacious as hell.
@@skwills1629 source of what you said with the tree?
Still every single bible says that it was the "fruit of knowledge" or tree or whatever that the abhramic god made forbiden.
What does that mean? Your sky daddy didnt wanted eve and adam to gain knowledge or else "they will become like god"
Stick your religious prooaganda in your skull. This is an atheist channel.
@@theice5663 That doesn't mean Christians, or people of any religious persuasion, aren't allowed to comment on it. That's free debate, which is a good healthy thing. If all the commentators on this channel shared the same view, the comments would be boring as hell.
For a minute I was like "Awwww, Satan's being a bro" but then he just had to mess with it >:(
Bad Satan! *Sprays him with a holy water bottle
Hahahaha
As a Christian, I was raised in a Christian family, actively involved in our Church, devoted (for years) to the love and wonder of the all powerful God I was introduced to as a child. Defender of the great book, the Bible, where I got all my moral stories of love and forgiveness and personal sacrifice for a better cause.
As a Christian, I am fucking FURIOUS that a group of atheists has taught me more about the Bible then I learned in 25+years of "faith".
I'm almost heartbroken by my deception.
The look on the face of the angels cracks me up every time.
hahahhahah yeah totally
Just excellent satire! ..........except that it's all true - well done NSC - we miss you
what annoys me is that this is what christians are gonna say happened now
so THAT'S what happened
Jean Luc Picard may I just say I always thought you were 'earl grey... hot'
I want the same drugs Yahwe had please.
Been there man, not a fun ride XDDD
Eyes both within and without! EYES BOTH WITHIN AND WITHOUT!
Revelations was a fun chapter.
The devil made him do it? That explains everything. I can now forgive this god and join his religion next week.
I know it isn't this video but "you just outlawed cross dressing" is still the funniest thing ever to me
darkside12s but it is took directly from the bible :s
TheLonelyGoomba. Stuck between 2 pipes
The simplicity of the animation.. Reminds me of the early seasons of South Park. Awesome!
The apologetics used to rationalize slavery in the Bible are practically a circus act.
In the other video on slavery by NSC, the comment section is filled to the brim with some really incredible attempts to dismiss forced labor slavery as being anything advocated by the Bible God.
Even when confronted with the passage as found in Deut 20, where God commands that nations be made forced labor slaves (not simply indentured servants), the apologetic is that this particular law was only temporary and therefore magically doesn't count.
They'll deny Deut 20 to the death.
This is what happens when one weds themselves to a "holy book".
All evidence must be made to conform to the preferred conclusion, which in this case, is the believer's conclusion that God did not condone forced labor lifetime slavery.
Actually, Atheists who attack The Bible are more wedded to their own "Holy Book", mainly Videos or Websites like these. Historians, including Non-Christian Historians, would Tell You Slavery was not the same Institution in Antiquity as it was in the Antebellum South, and those same Historians would say Biblical Laws about Slavery are in fact better than those of other Lands of the Time and that Slavery was often Humane. Dismissing this as Mental Gymnastics or mere excuses is Rather evidence that You are far more concerned with Mocking Christians than with Facts.
Especially since You make no effort to grasp this "Holy Book" is actually several Books, Christians do not typically see it as a Rule Book, and Christians Historicallyt Opposed Slavery, and were the First to do so. And I don't just mean the Transatlantic Variety. I mean in Late Antiquity.
@@skwills1629 HC! It's better slavery from the omni benevolent god! And "slavery was often humane"... No no, this is not mental gymnastics, you're just showing everybody how awful your moral, and the bible moral at it, is. Oh and if god said slavery is ok and you opposed it, you better be prepared for hell.
BTW every atheist knows it is a set of books, this is usually pointed out because Christians see it as a Rule Book (capital letter just like you, see?)
@@caioporto9234 - You've just Proven my Point. I dint say "It was a better kind oif Slavery because Omni god said so", and not addressing my Actual Statements, and instead Twisting them, reveals this is about You being Evil and Tearing others down.
By the way, Christians do not View The Bible as a Rule Book. That;s how Atheists Like You say They see it. Literally No Christian Says This about The Bible.
Also, No Christian says Opposition to Slavery leads You to Hell either.
Nor does The Bible say "If You don;t support Slavery, You Go to Hell".
You're just Lying about it.,
@@skwills1629 No, it says if you don't follow god's rule you go to hell.
Yes many do. I've heard it again and again "the bible is 100% correct and must be followed" = rule book. You just have to go to other NSC videos (EDIT: comment section), specially the quiz one, to witness it first hand. Or you can just live in your bubble.
"Biblical Laws about Slavery are in fact better than those of other Lands of the Time "... Biblical Laws about Slavery = omni benevolent god said so, better than those of other Lands of the Time = better kind of slavery. You said historians'd say that, but it' all just the same: horrible moral values.
"You being Evil and Tearing others down" Oh yeah! I'm EVIL LOL
@@caioporto9234 - This is a Lie.
*No, it says if you don't follow god's rule you go to hell.
*
Its God capital G. It is used as a name. And no, The Bible does not say "If you don't follow gods rules you go to Hell". You are an idiot. This isn't even a Rule. Its a Legal Code from the Nation State of Israel.
*Yes many do. I've heard it again and again "the bible is 100% correct and must be followed" = rule book*
Saying The Bible is 100% Correct and Must be Followed does not mean it is a Rule Book, and Christians also don't actually say that either. Many Christians do believe The Bible is Inerrant, and believe that its Teachings must be followed, but they do not view it a a List of Rules to Obey, which is what a Rule Book is. And no one can See the Book Of Ruth as a "Rule Book". What"Rules" are in The Book Of Ruth?
. *You just have to go to other NSC videos (EDIT: comment section), specially the quiz one, to witness it first hand. Or you can just live in your bubble.
*
What You mean is, I Should go see Christina saying something else entirley that You Misrepresent to mean that.
I['ve seen it before. The most recent Paulpogia Video I saw claims a Christian Apologist tells us to e Dishonest. I watched the Video then read The Transcript, and He never said to be Dishonest. Paullogia Lied. As did those in his Comment Section. But according them, He is telling You how to Deceive People.
Atheists like You always Claim this or that is what someone said when they Really idn't.
Misrepresentation iss all part of the proccess.
*"Biblical Laws about Slavery are in fact better than those of other Lands of the Time "... Biblical Laws about Slavery = omni benevolent god said so*
What I said was, The Laws regrading Slavery in The Bble were better than those of other Regions of the Time Period they were Produced. Not "Omni god said so". You are proving my point about Misrepresentation.
, *better than those of other Lands of the Time = better kind of slavery. You said historians'd say that, but it' all just the same: horrible moral values.
*
Slavery was actually the best alternaitive. The other Two Options were Execution or Imprisonment. Prisons in ANtiquity were little better than Puts in the Ground. Unsanitary environments one could easily Die in from Malnutrition and DIsease as it lacked Sanitation.
Most Slaves were actually Prisoners of War or else those who had cited Crimes not serious enough to warrant execution, or those who owed Money. And Slavery was not permeation in most cases, even for those not of Israel.
Contrary to how most atheists like You out it. Then again Most Atheists Lie Yu say only a Jewish Slave was Freed fare 7 Yers, and if a Slave is not Jewish they could be Kept for Life, not Realising Israel was not "Jewish".
You Simpy don't Understand the Biblical Texts at all.
Slavery allowed You actual Survival and a more Healthy Life in the Open than did Imprisonment or Execution.
Also, I am not a Fundamentalist Caricature. I View The Biblical Texts as Products of their Time, whose Principles are to be Lerned from but whose Historical Context must be considered.
You do not.
*"You being Evil and Tearing others down" Oh yeah! I'm EVIL LOL
*
You have proven You are Evil by Your Dishonesty.
Thank you for this. I love the silence at the end. It gives you a moment to let the horror sink in.
Never have I read my bible more
The angles face gets me every fucking time
🤣 emoji would
You do get, don't you, the reference to the Oscar Award winning film of 2011, right?
Or did you have the same comment for that film?
I like your angels.
I like your face
I like this statement
I like mac n cheese
Been rewatching several of these vids recently.
This one was deviously hilarious! 😂
From what I've learned from the Bible, I'm convinced that if any of it is real (it's not though), then God and Satan are actually the same person. So it's not so much a Trinity but a Quadrinity.
Joyous tears flow from every video nonstamp makes. Nonstamp for president. :)
Yeah, the law was pretty nuanced. That passage also includes a statement that if an owner causes the loss of an eye and/or tooth, then he must let the slave go free. So it's a challenge: if the slave is nimble, he has to try to align the blow so as to lose only a tooth/eye, and then stay alive. The master has to try to NOT hit the slave in the eye/tooth, and if he beats him unconscious, he must try to keep him alive for a day or so to avoid murder charge. Sounds pretty compassionate to me!
OUT OF CONTEXT!!!!!!!!!
I know for a fact that they read their own bible. my dad is a pastor and he's smart enough not to read the bible to them on Sunday's. because I don't believe he believes the lies in the bible. me and him have gotten into to many arguments about the bible. so I know it really makes him second guess his bible. but they still believe and he still takes their money. sorry but I'm just being honest. how the fuck they still go is beyond me. I damn show am not going.
I meant to say that they don't read their own bible.
When you go to church regularly you learn remarkably little about the bible.
I'd love to see Christians reacting to these videos.
Loved it, great video.
I thought this was a joke but I looked up the Leviticus scripture at the end and...Holy crap!
thank you and please continue your great job.
I got a 60 sec ad from the church of latter day saints 🙄
Great vid! Only problem I had with it was that it implied that this passage is not 100% on character for god.
Love the King's Speech parody!
That eye pop at 3:11 is great🤣🤣🤣
fkn laughed my ass off at the angels face at 2:31 hahaha
You prob already did this one, but what about Adam and Eve disobeying God's command to not eat from the tree of knowledge. If they didn't know right from wrong, and they ate from the tree, how did they know it was wrong to disobey a command?
The greatest knowledge they get from that fruit, is that the husband and wife that lived together discovered they were naked!
Well, there is this old darkmatter vid. ua-cam.com/video/3m0YYy9lqqs/v-deo.html
@@billyjoejimbob75 he did an Adam and Eve video where instead of an apple tree it was a disgusting bog or something. I can link it you if you want?
He who? NonStamp or Darkmatter? The one where Jeff put the tree out in the middle of nowhere?
@@billyjoejimbob75 it was non stamp but it's a similar idea to jeff
God better be Awesome ! , because I've seen 👀enough logical answers on the internet that I haven't a clue why anyone would ever become a Christian or go to church .
This channel is criminally underrated
you're going to make me cry
This makes it look as if YHWH didn't intend to say this.
The OT revels in it, it is absolutely part of every book.
darkside12s Oh really? Then how come these words exactly are recited in the Bible?
When are you going to make more videos, they are so awesome!
the only problem with this is that it propagates the belief that satan is somehow a near-equal to yahveh, and not an instrument of his will.
That’s the entire point - look at some of the other comments and you’ll see what I mean. The fact is that originally, Yahweh was the one who wrote and said this, without any such influence by Satan. This video is parodying that by making Satan almost equal in power to God, so that it almost makes sense than the actual book, in a weird twisted way.
Satan, being the avatar of evil, is shown in these videos regularly outsmarting and gaining the edge over an all-powerful god of creation who is all-knowing and benevolent, turning his own kind actions into evils that plague the world. Compared to the original Bible though, it actually makes more sense despite the fact that Satan is on par with God, since it explains why God in the Old Testament and the Bible is frequently depicted as such a megalomaniacal sociopath who has killed people by the millions for not simply believing in him.
By making Satan a kind of being that is the same power level as God, if not an even more powerful being than Yahweh himself, it gives more reason to hate Satan and to respect God because in the end he’s not entirely at fault because he’s either at worst incompetent or at best trying to stave off Satans influence. However, in order to believe that Yahweh is truly an all-powerful god of creation with none to rival him in power, you have to acknowledge the fact that God has committed atrocities of a high account, leaving no one to blame but Yahweh himself for his actions.
This all in all leaves Christians to accept that either that God isn’t truly all-powerful or all-knowing, or that God isn’t truly as benevolent and compassionate as said Christians usually depict him.
That being said though, what Christians believe is not at all influenced or waived by me. I personally believe that most Atheists or Deists though created by Christianity, and for good reason too.
@@datwitchyswordfanyou're kind of missing the forest for the trees. these videos tend to debate against christianity using their own scripture as the framework.
this video differs in that it's using popular belief instead of recorded dogma.
“How about a worldwide pandemic, haven’t had one of those in a while” lol
The Bible. The inerrant Truth, and Word of the Lord...
I liked the little fanfare you added
I love the Avengers music in the background
You could make a seriously awesome sitcom with these characters!
3:50 angel pog face
one of your best efforts!
ahh, thank you for your input Scribe. i have seen lately some devices that help people with stuttering by delaying what they hear, and since i had "cured" my stuttering the same way ( sorta) as a child i had assumed that all stuttering was because of the same reason. still hopefully between what i said and what you have said hopefully these comments will help should another stutter wanders across them. thanks again Scribe.
A somber theme in these videos: The bible can only makes sense if you accept that the incarnation of evil consistently outwitted the benevolent omniscient god writing it.
Thank you for sharing another example of an morally questionable passage from the bible.
Yeah, taking slaves is 'morally questionable' to say the least. No, streak that, it's actually not questionable.
lmao I got an ad for the christian chat app "yesheis"
Thank you your great man!!!
So God says slavery is part of his plan. We the people in 2020 says slavery is wrong. God gets angry at us for disobeying his perfect plan thus sends us to hell. We can't win! 🤷
It has so many contradictions...
Those who shave their beard go to hell, but those who don't shave their beard _also_ go to hell.
One's first instinct might be to think that women might be safe from this particular contradiction, but they get screwed over by other verses.
NonStampCollector I think you don't give God enough credit for the bad things the he says in the bible. I mean, I get what you're doing but Yahweh has no excuse for what he says in the bible. He's just horrible.
The fact that the crossed out words should have been used shows how inhumane it is.
7. a) Corrals throw salt from the water and bind it in their structures.
b) Salt is bound at the ground of the oceans and moved via tectonics back to the continents
c) (Sorry, i´ve forgotten this one.) If seas dry out, the salt also comes back to the land. (thats how we get a salt stock)
i love cartoons of religion
He's been a great help... 😂
I remembered this video and used these verses in a comment fight about weather bible slaves were indentured servants.
Wait, is that Toon Town music I hear in the background?
0o0
gasping face.
That was from the movie. The Kings Speech
Thanks. I have enjoyed this polite and educational exchange.
Why did the red guy rewrite the text at the last minute?
I guess god needed to blame someone so he told the story as so devil did this :) but nah god is this satanic by himself
nice one, i think it really got the point across yeah :)
And Christians will say "THAT WAS IN THE OLD TESTAMENT" ... Okay but the bible also says God never changes but stays the same. Okay, so with that logic then I suppose he's also okay with modern day slavery as well.
Kings speech was a great fucking movie
I like your handle: NonStampCollector. It really makes you wonder when you see Christians proudly gathering with their holy book, do they ever bother to read the damn thing?
What does "years of zero" mean? And i still don´t understand the "The 95% confidence intervals"-part.
That was just......... SPLENDID!!!!!!
Honny, respect is earned.... not granted...
that you can't tell them is perhaps the single greatest indicator that something is wrong there.
Rhe first written text that argues in favour of emancipation of slavery was written in ancient Greece by Stoics.
2. b) Formation of a star
Gas-clouds contract more and more, the pressure in the center grows and also the temperature. When the temperature is high enough, the process of fussion starts and creates a balance between gravity and the internal energy-output. The star begins to shine.
This rocks!! Love it.
Even for a parable it is a callous thing to say. "The suffering doesn't matter only that you do your job and only after you die will you be rewarded."
In all history slavery has been the fate of those who lose wars. Even the bible states so Deuteronomy 21:10-14, Deuteronomy 20:14, the only apparent laws protecting slaves are stated Deuteronomy 23:15-16, Exodus 21:26-27, Exodus 21:20-21. Now part of this argument is due to the language in the bible the more recent "revisions" change it to be PC
I'm kinda confused, by what the point of the video was can someone clarify
8. A result after the flood? How should the water cause the whole himalaya to rise rapidly?
9. Really unlikely that seeds of plants would fall to torn down trees, stay there while the trees float in the flood-water, don´t fall down because of gravity, waves or the massive rain, and than, after the land is dry again, fall down and grow. (and not one time, millions of times)
10. In relation to the massive amount of animals and supplies, it was a small ship.
44 Thy bond servant also, and thy bondmaid, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you: of them shall ye buy servants and maids.
45 And moreover, of the children of the strangers that are sojourners among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you which they begat in your land: these shall be your [a]possession.
"Oh but the bible teaches against slavery too!"
I agree, but which passages do you think the slavers were looking at for the last 2,000 years? Modern Christianity has proven how easily people can ignore passages that disagree with them.
"The devil can site scripture for his purposes", and that's the scripture's fault as much as it is the devil's.
That's true. Bottom line, until they give a rigorous definition of the word "kind", they will always be able to weasel out of an argument. I once tried (with minor success) defining it for them in a way they would not like, and then asking them to refute it by defining it for themselves. I defined a kind as identical lifeforms, like 2 bacteria after one splits. therefore my parents did not bring forth after their own kind, because I am different from both of them, thus a new kind.
I wonder if this is a reason why most nations did not like the people of the Bible back then. The ones that think these things today. Without naming names of course, I don't want to be called antisemitic.
-->
6. Much of the animals need specific environment-conditions to survive, such as cold areas for arctic-animals.
7. Most of the sealife would die, because the flood would mix saltwater and freshwater.
8. With the highest mountains covered by water, it would be extremely could at the surface of that ocean. (maybe good for the penguines, but bad for the camels)
9. Noah would have to save the plants to, which means that he would have to plant them afterwards by himself.
-->
2a) You forget, that the materials have been very hot while the planets formed. Clumps of magma will stick together.
a2) In a swirl we have no objects which could stick together. Its just a example how the rotating disk forms.
The rotation of the planets is a result of the faster moving particles at the outside, and the slower moving particles at the inside... can´t explain that with that few words.
Which planetary objects do you mean, because there are different reasons for "wrong" rotation.
Oh, I was refering to Satan, the character of NonStampCollector.
Assuming you're referring to the genealogies given in the OT, you could read the following article: reasons . org / articles / the-genesis-genealogies
Still perfect in 2021
c) The video claims, that material for the layers we find came from that crack. So you disagree?
d) As far as i understood, the video speaks about the mid-oceanic-rifts. Which rifts did you mean?
e) And you know why? Because the water would emit its temperature to the atmosphere. -> cooking earth
The heat doesn´t just disapear.