@@xcomfan they learned about what Brexit meant along with us. In fact I believe even expert started to analyse and understand what Brexit meant along with the Brexit process ("process")
And that is completely understandable. There is no clear line in the Brexit process, no actual progress. MPs can vote "No" all they want, No-Deal comes for the UK all the same. At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if, on the last day before the Brexit date, whether that is April 12th or not, they get cold feet and revoke Artikel 50.
Next on Brexit- -Welsh MPs attempt to reawaken the Red Dragon for advice on what to do. -Ian Blackford caber tosses the Mace into the Thames. -Labour MP lights Boris Johnson's hair on fire, turns out he's actually bald and he covered up his head with a bunch of hay.
@@dgarrard100 Additionally, Parliament voted and affirmed that strange women lying ponds distributing SWORDS is not a proper form of deciding government.
Division between the parliamentarians and the society that are _supposed_ to be representing. 2/3 of MPs represent constituencies that voted to leave the EU. This should not be an issue to deliver Brexit. More people want to leave with a WTO Brexit (no deal) than want to stay part of the EU. They have to have No Deal as the default option and actually do it, with any deal being an optional extra. We need to genuinely pursue leaving with a WTO Brexit as the only valid and possible option now according to the EU, British voters and for the sake of democracy. The fact they are legislating to remove the purest for of Brexit is a total fucking disgrace that the people will never forgive the political establishment for. The ERG are the only group that actually represent the majority of voters, yet make up a tiny part of parliament and the government. UKIP resurgence here we come.
France: "Either come up with a plan, or we will veto any extension request." UK: "Our plan is to ask for more time to come up with a plan." France: ...
They will give her an extension. We are not leaving on the 12th of April.The thing is, this prooves that the EU needs the UK, and is bowing down to us in hopes that the UK revokes Brexit.
@@lovejetfuel4071 The EU does not need the UK. Brexit is just a load of hassle for them, so having more time to arrange things is fine, although they've sorted most things, unlike the UK. Ultimately, the EU will be fine. The UK won't be fine.
This won't stop a No Deal Brexit, The EU won't renegotiate the withdrawal agreement and May's deal has already proven three times to be crappy. If the EU doesn't agree to the extension then we either leave with No Deal or cancel Brexit.
The EU will renegotiate the withrawal agreement if a long extension has been approved and different so-called red lines are decided. (f.e. if the UK wants to stay in the customs union and/or common market, a different withrawal agreement is needed)
I think you answered your own statement with the very last line. If The EU doesmt agree to the extension then we (leave with no deal or) cancel Brexit. The part in brackets is what they are ruling out so just read the rest.
ö. . , id like to argue that the government are the undecided, its obvious they want yo stay, so they have to work against what they want, while attempting to cancel it because theyre worried about losing their money, that is not, not the public
Russell Smith Russell Smith correction 51% of British people: We want to leave but we have no idea how 48% of British people: We don't want to leave at all. Government: Leaving will screw up the economy etc how do we stop this ^.^
Russell Smith aha thanks for being respectful man finally someone who wants a discussion. I respectfully disagree tho leave doesn't mean leave. The referendum was advisory, I can ask you "do you want a million quid" and you answer "yes" doesn't mean I now have an obligation to give you a million quid. It was just a question. Furthermore how does a no deal brexit deal with the Irish backstop? I'll admit I'm not very knowledgeable in that area but I'm pretty sure that a no deal would cause a problem there that can't simply be ignored
Anyone else impressed that TLDR can get the graphics done so quickly? I'd still be working on the first slide. Surely they are excused the odd mistake.
UK: An important political decision cannot be passed if there is no clear majority Also UK: Lol I guess if 51.9% of the voters in this non-legally binding referendum tell us to leave we have no other choice
Dixiklo9000 All the major parties all had in their manifesto that they would uphold the result of the referendum... I don’t understand how remainers are trying to say that THE LARGEST REFERENDUM TURNOUT IN UK HISTORY should not be respected
I'm sick of hearing "in the nation's interest". It is a meaningless phrase, since both sides have a completely different idea of what is in the nation's interest.
I think that we can all agree that "a" deal is better than "no" deal, even if by some slide of hand it isn't May's deal at least the people would know where the country is going.
Ok, just a comment for the first 20 seconds: what a time we live in that it has to be stated what HOUR was the vid made in, because the situation changes so rapidly. Strong and stable leadership, right here :D
I don't understand why there hasn't been cross party negotiations in the first place. Brexit affects everyone, so logic would imply all political parties (as all elected mps have constituents they represent) would be involved. Guess the Tories now can lay blame on Corbyn if all goes tits up, which judging by previous form, is a given.
May left it to the last minute, I speculate on purpose in order to force her deal through. But as her deal has been heavily rejected this clearly hasn't worked, regardless of her motives. Cross party negotiations are easier to do with more time and this would have resulted in a softer brexit which I suspect isn't what May wants. By leaving it late it's harder to get a cohesive plan together and a hard brexit scenario is more likely.
The problem is blame. Regardless of your opinion and belief, there should never be a sense of blame. If you're working on a team project; you may have different opinions or beliefs and you work together to find the best solution to a problem. It doesn't matter if that doesn't work in the end; just that you planned, debated and came to the best decision at the time. The government has an extremely poor mindset where they don't want to accept blame for certain decisions and this can prevent decisions that may be the superior option. This creates a toxic, childish environment to work within and this is a fundamental problem in politics.
@@lachyt5247 Since you seem to make reference to the (american?) federal government I assume you want to generalize to the concept of government in general. In that case I'd like to inform you, that this is not a general rule. Not only is bipartisan deliberation in commitees an important part of parliamentary work around the world, there have been cases in which coalitions included more parties then were needed to achieve majority. Most notably the swiss government which typically includes members from all relevant parties in parliament. The concept in general is called Consociationalism, the approach that as many voices as possible should be heard.
The house deciding the timetable. The house takes control of the extension discussion. How much longer until Theresa May is made to leave? At this point, MPs are voting more to take control from the government than they are to actually deal with Brexit.
We are long past the point where the only reason for theresa may still being in office is the simple fact that no one wants that hot bloody mess that is brexit, because it's career suicide.
How do you legally stop a 'no-deal' scenario unilaterally without accepting the only possible deal? How is it not clear to parliament, that the EU determines if it will be a hard deal or not when the deal on the table is voted away. The EU won't come back with a different deal but it's like they're counting on being able to leverage the EU. The same EU who has clearly expressed time and time again: "Just get on with it, we're done."
Well, the legal options are: Revoke Article 50 Accept what ever deal the government can negotiate with the EU Exit with No Deal So we can take the No Deal off the table, then decide the EU deal is not acceptable, so revoke Article 50. And because the referendum was not legally binding, legally we can. And if you want to hold the results of the referendum that closely to your heart, remember that the Leave campaign broke campaign laws.
@@Coldheart322 even if the referendum was legally binding parliament could still revoke article 50, it would simply then have to enact it again at a later date , it was rushed anyway, which is why it's revocation or doubling by other means has became inevitable. & revoking article 50 would not mean the end of brexit, far from it.
@@Marcusjnmc It can't revoke in bad faith as per the ECJ decision if it revokes it must be an intentional and unequivocal decision to remain, to make it not look like bad faith their would at least have to go through the motions of letting grass roots campaigning build up from scratch again so they can claim they were forced into it. Of course most of the leave voters will be dead by then and they are being replaced by mostly remainers so if they did actually have the balls to do it that would be it pretty much.
perhaps they can take a short holiday in Spain... No, wait, Italy.... Oh, shit. Maybe somewhere outside the the EU would be more sensible at the moment.
Probably, he spends every day of his work in there. You get used to MP's names and constituencies and habits over time. Do this for enough years and you'll probably remember most faces/names by heart.
@@Madhattersinjeans I don't think it is only because he got "used to it" - I think it is John Bercow's commitment and dedication to his job, that results in his knowledge and his ability to memorise and deliver it correctly - that kind of dedication comes from his personal hard work and being grounded because of good upbringing. I just recently found out that his father was a taxi driver - that in itself is a decent indicator to know the well grounded background for people of John Bercow's age group.
@@thec-m the 1993 one was fine, once properly counted the government were ahead anyway by one vote so Boothroyd's was discarded. The previous vote requiring a speaker to vote was 1990.
Referendum 2016. The choice on the ballot paper, Stay or Leave the EU. There was nothing about making rubbish deals. Our MPs ratified Article 50 making our vote law, so wtf are they doing. May stated that, deal or no deal we would leave on 29.3.19, so wtf is she playing at. With the EU running this country our MPs had but one task on their 'to-do' list, Brexit. What an utter F**K UP. God help us all because these bastards won't.
@Daedalus well, uk politics doesn't seem to stable and healthy, neither does social cohesion in the country. I wouldn't call it collapse but the eu is weathering the storm a lot better then the uk, which is exactly the opposite of what was predicted by the leave camp would happen.
They earn it though, this is a valuable resource and it is a lot of very hard work. I just hope they can keep the momentum going with something else when this brexit nonsense is done with.
@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 what exactly is stable politics any good for ? when politics becomes too stable you get unopposed majorities that don't have to actually answer to anybody, or entrenched opposed camps that only ever have any interest in discrediting the other, a split parliament that Actually has to work across the house in the interests of all people of the nation is in my eyes an extremely good thing.
@Daedalus the government represents the people. Pretty normal way to organise anything involving large numbers of people. If you do not like what your government does in europe, elect a government that does represent whatever it is you want. This stuff isn't rocketscience.
@@danib577 I'm tired of all of this and I have a good nights sleep and only watch the videos, I don't make them. At the end of the day there is clear intent to compromise the United Kingdom with a bad EU deal and May's insistent pursuit of this is perplexing so much so that I can only to come to the following conclusions a) She's been bribed by big business to keep the UK in the EU b) She knows something that we don't about No Deal (very doubtful) c) She's insane.
@Tsanko Tsankov Did it say that on the ballet? Or do you think maybe some people thought you’d be able to negotiate new trade deals before destroying all the one’s you had?
Keep up the good work guys! You are my go to news outlet for brexit and I cannot wait for your up,lads so I can get caught up with everything that’s happened
@@lachyt5247 Well done you came on a video you don't like just to be a bitchy little snowflake and then you got owned. Keep making the world a better place one arrogant comment at a time brother.
Thank you, guys. I was unable to follow the news yesterday, but your video provided a great summary to what lollies like a very lengthy and complicated process.
What about a detailed video on the Good Friday agreement? With the specific effects of a no deal Brexit on it. Attempt #7 (get a little sleep first though ^^)
@@GrasshopperKelly Why next Wednesday? Sure a video about the Good Friday agreement online on Good Friday would be fitting. But if you have a other more fitting reason then sure share it.
At what point are people going to stop and say; Ok, we made a mistake, time to cancel this whole mess and return to the drawing board and try again when we have actual plans on the table for how to do this.
Mine voted for the People's Vote. But we'll lose her if there's another election, because we've been Gerrymandered and will now be two Tory constituencies rather than one Labour one.
Unless one is in Buckingham, since until Bercow resigns as the Speaker, only extreme fringe groups like the racist (as admitted by their former leader Griffin) BNP and the Christian Party (who hold one extreme policy of outlawing all religious beliefs that aren't Christian (including atheist views)) will run against him, effectively making his seat unopposed. And most of Buckingham won't vote for those groups, no matter how bad things might get.
I wanted to let you know how grateful I am for your videos. I married a Brit and got my citizenship in 2011. We are currently living outside of the UK and news about Brexit is hard to come by here. Your channel keeps me up to date on all the news. Thank you so much for the great reporting and please keep it up even after Brexit!
I'm Patreoning on the condition that you get some rest when all this is done, sir, good gracious. The sacrifices you are making truly astonishing and we thank you for them.
Unless it's the Brexit vote, because obviously the difference was so marginal we should have another vote. And then another one. Until it's 51% against and then it'll be fine.
How are people resigning because the two parties are working together shows what some peoples true agendas are and it’s not in the interest of the people
The fact that it is now known that the NHS and the government have failed to stockpile enough vital medication for a no deal, and so many MPs still voted for a no deal, shows they don't give a s*** about the people.
To give them some slack, I think that it is only part of the reason. Other reasons include that they believe the labour party has deliberately caused disruption to cause chaos within the Tories party, May has shown to be weak begging the opposition for help, thirdly going against the majority of her own cabinet 14 voted for no deal, 10 against. Whether these are legitimate reasons are up for you to decided but I thought I'd shed some light on the situation.
@@starlinguk Oh but they tried you know like they tried with giving money to the company with no ferries, they set aside money to stockpile medications in the warehouses that they don't actually have. Course I could have told them that this would be the case Britain is a modern economy with just in time logistics systems much of the warehouse space was redeveloped as it's far more costly to warehouse in bulk when you have IT systems that can handle doing everything just in time.
"No deal" being the default if no other arrangement is decided upon, "legally preventing no deal" can only be done by coming to another arrangement. Enacting a new law to prevent no deal is enacting a law to legalise ignoring the result of the referendum.
"is enacting a law to legalise ignoring the result of the referendum." It's already legal to ignore the result of the referendum, seeing as it was advisory.
If that was true, why is "revoke a50" and "new referendum" motions voted down over and over again? 70% majority would have gotten either of those passed without a problem.
Jason They fled or refused to take positions of leadership because they always knew it was impossible to deliver. Nigel Farage fucking resigned from UKIP leadership immediately after the referendum, which should have been a glorious moment for him and his party... Jacob Rees Mogg equally has no designs on the PM's job bc he also knows Brexit can't be delivered and prefers to score political points by criticising the government instead.
@Blood A second referendum or even a general election would be democracy. If you trust the public more than the current Parliament, you should want one of those. If you don’t, I don’t see why you’d trust a 2% margin generic “Leave” vote from two years ago more than one taken today. Probably because you know remain voters would actually turn out knowing that Brexit could actually happen, and a vote better reflecting the public’s desires would reject “Leave”, even if it was still done two years ago.
Thank you so much for this update. It's quite hard to follow these events yourself and actually understand what they mean, even on tge day when it's happening. Will definitely support you. ❤️
I don't think EU will be giving another short extension. In fact i am certain that there will be no short extension. And i have a doubt that MP's will accept the EU terms so long extension is probably unlikely. If there is not gonna be any extensions, then April 12 is gonna be the day that UK leaves the EU.
And it will be without a deal. Due to shared incompetence MP, government & PM got what they never wanted. The people sitting on the platform just watching.
I salute the commitment and hard work TLDR puts into producing these videos - MUCH RESPECT. Having said that, these videos would not be half as interesting without John Berkow - the man is an absolute LEGEND!
I find it amazing that you pump out these videos concerning brexit in this short time and they are actually getting better and more informative all the time. Keep up the good work and I really like the inclusion of the debate footage and you pointing out stuff.
Talked to most of the population have ya. Selfishness? You mean voting on a basis of sovereignty? While "Most of you" voted to be financially and economically secure. Sounds like some self preservation shit to me which is pretty selfish as well. Guess we are all selfish. Welcome to the funny pages of history fellow clown.
Everybody's talking about the 4 March/April goof... no one's saying a thing about 4:21 ?? I mean, that's the limpest "Orda orda" I think I've ever heard from Bercow... my dude... is he feeling okay?
Considering how MPs seem to change their minds on brexit at opportune times for them, it seems quite hypocritical of May to keep referring to the "will of the people" on a 3 year old referendum that was "won" by somewhat tight margins, and not allow the people to change their minds. Just chiming in with an outside perspective, and I think it would overall be a loss for the rest of the EU to see the UK leave our union.
Your content really helps me a lot to understand Brexit especially since I work in news and I need to catch up with what I missed and what I don't understand. Thank you!
@@FartInhalerSlamPoetry You do realised that I don't work for the British news mate? I work in Asia and trust me; no one understands what the heck is going on with Brexit 😂
@@Cortanakya I work for a news outlet in Asia and Europe is quite far away from us. So, we have to try and understand British laws, the significance of EU, etc. So it's not especially easy for us to digest it and make the audience understands due to the complexity of the topic. 😅
It is very easy to understand the strong desire not to end up in a No Deal solution. I also have a very strong desire not to end up there. But if the UK is to leave, and the current deal is not acceptable, and bits of it need changing, I’m not sure telling the EU that we will never agree to a No Deal is the best way of getting them to agree any changes. If I was an EU negotiator I would now refuse to agree to any changes we propose as I would know we couldn’t use our ultimate weapon.
Nobody ever has proposed a realistic alternative to the backstop. I understand why some people don't like it... but without an alternative, what should be done?
The EU also dont want a No Deal, because their economy is strongly entangled with the British. If the UK leave the EU with a No Deal it wont just hurt them, but also export giants like Germany. I am no expert in Brexit, im only repeating what i heard german experts say.
@@Pyriold the alternative is very simple, it's simply also extremely unpalatable to the conservatives as they've spent years garnering a support base around anti immigration policies, retain free movement & a close partnership with europe as we exit participation in european governance.
1ultronix1 I think that is correct. A No Deal is a Not Good Deal for either side. I think the current Deal is better for the EU than it is for UK, in some areas. I don’t think it is 100% a poor deal for us, only about 5% is. But if we want to tweak that final 5%, so that we both have some sort of deal, forbidding a No Deal is not, in my view, the best way to achieve this.
In the case this bill becomes law, the PM is being asked to wrestle the EU with their hands tied to her back. It will only leave a few options. This is, in case the EU does not allow for any extension and insists on its deal, then May will be faced with three options. A) Accept the deal on the table (what the Pairlament has rejected numerous times), B) Have a NO Deal at hand (what will be then illegal to accept) or C) to Revoke Art. 50 and participate in the EU elections (what would mean Brexit would not happen any time soon). So in essence Pairlament is left with the option: "accept the deal" or "revoke art 50 for the time being". So what is it going to be?🤔
Let me get this right - a law was passed by parliament that said we leave on 29th Mach 2019 - which has been ignored. A law is being passed which says we cannot leave without a deal - and it has to be obeyed. I think they are making it up as they go along.
They are trying to save face and not explicitly say to their citizen's "well you voted for brexit which was a very shitty plan to begin with because literally all our solutions where flat out worse than where we started, so we are just going to go ahead and say no because you guys are really fucking stupid". Obviously you can see how doing such a thing would pretty much end a career, even if it is the only logical choice. So they are instead playing chicken hoping that it is the EU who will cancel the thing, so they can save face and put "blame" on the EU. But the EU understood this and now they are essentially forcing the UK to either accept their stupidity or collapse because of it.
I can say with absolute certainty that if your videos didn’t exist, I would have genuinely no clue what was going on.
Even MP's have no idea what is going on
I understand it but i could never summerise it like this. FP
They sure are synthetic and knowledgeable.
@@xcomfan they learned about what Brexit meant along with us.
In fact I believe even expert started to analyse and understand what Brexit meant along with the Brexit process ("process")
And that is completely understandable. There is no clear line in the Brexit process, no actual progress. MPs can vote "No" all they want, No-Deal comes for the UK all the same.
At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if, on the last day before the Brexit date, whether that is April 12th or not, they get cold feet and revoke Artikel 50.
The 4RD of March?!... someone needs sleep.
There was a fantastic clip on the daily show from CNN that showed that America was in 21th place in math.
Fourd?
4rd of Aprach!
Yep I tought the same ^^
I even Stopped the Video and Checked the Date because I tought UA-cam offered me a Month Old Video xD
The Copper Bill 10:43
Next on Brexit-
-Welsh MPs attempt to reawaken the Red Dragon for advice on what to do.
-Ian Blackford caber tosses the Mace into the Thames.
-Labour MP lights Boris Johnson's hair on fire, turns out he's actually bald and he covered up his head with a bunch of hay.
@@dgarrard100 Additionally, Parliament voted and affirmed that strange women lying ponds distributing SWORDS is not a proper form of deciding government.
- They actually find a use for Mark Francois after trying and failing with Andrew Bridgen
-MPs vote on a petition by the UK Gambling Association to decide whether to decide on the leave or remain question by tossing a coin
Just another day in British parliament!
I'm all for bringing back Owain Glyndwr and the Welsh Dragon for some old fashion saxon slaughter
"DIVISION!!"
Yeah, that just about sums it up, really.
Ingrid Van Waes awesome, another place to shoot up besides D.C.
CLEAR THE LOBBY!
Division between the parliamentarians and the society that are _supposed_ to be representing. 2/3 of MPs represent constituencies that voted to leave the EU. This should not be an issue to deliver Brexit. More people want to leave with a WTO Brexit (no deal) than want to stay part of the EU.
They have to have No Deal as the default option and actually do it, with any deal being an optional extra. We need to genuinely pursue leaving with a WTO Brexit as the only valid and possible option now according to the EU, British voters and for the sake of democracy. The fact they are legislating to remove the purest for of Brexit is a total fucking disgrace that the people will never forgive the political establishment for.
The ERG are the only group that actually represent the majority of voters, yet make up a tiny part of parliament and the government.
UKIP resurgence here we come.
France: "Either come up with a plan, or we will veto any extension request."
UK: "Our plan is to ask for more time to come up with a plan."
France: ...
Sort of like asking a genie for more wishes.
@@Carl-hs420a Worth a shot?
"9 days before brexit and nobody knows what's gonna happen..."
No truer words were ever said.
Thank you for keeping the bits of him saying "Ordaaah! Ordaah!"
This is so much more drama than any pay-per-view drama on TV...
Best sitcom currently on. It's like Niles from "The Nanny", but all the time, and all characters are Niles! :D
Nel This has more plot twists and turns than Breaking Bad lol
I (not english) always thought that it was paperview lol
Artur Kania Hahah I see how you came to that conclusion 😂 it does sound like “paperview” when spoken out loud
JayJay5244 better than porn.
Europe, "It's the Final Countdown."
8 days to go.
They will give her an extension. We are not leaving on the 12th of April.The thing is, this prooves that the EU needs the UK, and is bowing down to us in hopes that the UK revokes Brexit.
@@lovejetfuel4071
The UK is NOT needed, its appreciated if not currently.
@@lovejetfuel4071 The EU does not need the UK. Brexit is just a load of hassle for them, so having more time to arrange things is fine, although they've sorted most things, unlike the UK. Ultimately, the EU will be fine. The UK won't be fine.
Love JetFuel The EU is not bowing down. Keep on dreaming.
@@lovejetfuel4071 my god, in what world fo you live in?
This won't stop a No Deal Brexit, The EU won't renegotiate the withdrawal agreement and May's deal has already proven three times to be crappy. If the EU doesn't agree to the extension then we either leave with No Deal or cancel Brexit.
The EU will renegotiate the withrawal agreement if a long extension has been approved and different so-called red lines are decided.
(f.e. if the UK wants to stay in the customs union and/or common market, a different withrawal agreement is needed)
I think you answered your own statement with the very last line. If The EU doesmt agree to the extension then we (leave with no deal or) cancel Brexit.
The part in brackets is what they are ruling out so just read the rest.
Cancel Brexit it is. It was an insane idea from starters.
And it _would be fine_
@@Baccatube79 and then that isn't democracy, is it.
Pretty sure you meant April 4 on the intro screen. Unless Brexit has broken time itself.
It might have, at this point.
time has been broken. we are fairly far behind at this stage
I'm expecting to see a police box appear during one of the parliament live streams at this point.
4th as well, not 4rd xD
It feels like it has gone on for hundreds of years.
Britain: We British want to make our own decisions!
Then they can't decide how to exit the EU.
Er-hum...there is "a little bit of resistance", mate....
ö. . , id like to argue that the government are the undecided, its obvious they want yo stay, so they have to work against what they want, while attempting to cancel it because theyre worried about losing their money, that is not, not the public
Lol, 100 internet points to you!
Russell Smith Russell Smith correction
51% of British people: We want to leave but we have no idea how
48% of British people: We don't want to leave at all.
Government: Leaving will screw up the economy etc how do we stop this
^.^
Russell Smith aha thanks for being respectful man finally someone who wants a discussion. I respectfully disagree tho leave doesn't mean leave.
The referendum was advisory, I can ask you "do you want a million quid" and you answer "yes" doesn't mean I now have an obligation to give you a million quid. It was just a question. Furthermore how does a no deal brexit deal with the Irish backstop? I'll admit I'm not very knowledgeable in that area but I'm pretty sure that a no deal would cause a problem there that can't simply be ignored
Anyone else impressed that TLDR can get the graphics done so quickly? I'd still be working on the first slide. Surely they are excused the odd mistake.
David Panton they most likely have a template and a programme formula.
@@tj4234 Also a lot of experience by now.
I can't stop thinking about "4rd March". 1. "4rd" and 2. it's not even March
I love this channel
I love fate/zero
@@g7297 fate/zero both seasons 10/10 for me :D
@@g7297 Never read it.
I'm addicted to these Brexit videos and I'm not even British.
Dumpster fires have been quite entertaining lately
Green KC - That must be schadenfreude 😋
Do Europeans think the Trump-Mueller drama is as interesting as I, a Mexican-American, find the Brexit debacle?
UK: An important political decision cannot be passed if there is no clear majority
Also UK: Lol I guess if 51.9% of the voters in this non-legally binding referendum tell us to leave we have no other choice
1.4 MILLION PEOPLE
in NL such impactful decisions (like for instance, changing the constitution) require 2/3rd (66%) of the votes to pass.
Dixiklo9000 All the major parties all had in their manifesto that they would uphold the result of the referendum... I don’t understand how remainers are trying to say that THE LARGEST REFERENDUM TURNOUT IN UK HISTORY should not be respected
Ollie Young
Let’s just have a 2nd referendum them
@@samgarvey5669 than third and forth
I love how the Speaker's, John Bercow, hair grows wilder with every scene. His hair represents the state of his sanity.
Plot twist: tomorrow he is going bald!
And, for some reason "Allah" at 8:04
I'm sick of hearing "in the nation's interest". It is a meaningless phrase, since both sides have a completely different idea of what is in the nation's interest.
Actually no they both know what is in the nations interest just one side is more concerned what is in the disaster capitalists interest.
@Cropper /s ?
@Cropper it doesn't matter how many times you copy/paste that, it's still bollocks.
Mad araH I don't think the nation can even agree on who is part of it, considering the amount of support for local independence movements.
I think that we can all agree that "a" deal is better than "no" deal, even if by some slide of hand it isn't May's deal at least the people would know where the country is going.
Ok, just a comment for the first 20 seconds: what a time we live in that it has to be stated what HOUR was the vid made in, because the situation changes so rapidly. Strong and stable leadership, right here :D
Yeah but the other guy looked weird eating a bacon sandwich.
Hear, hear, ear, ear, ear, ...
Yeah it might be more stable than the us president!
@@tmarritt
LOL! 😂 🤣 😅
And these incompetents are the very people that Brexiteers want to give the keys to the entire kingdom
I don't understand why there hasn't been cross party negotiations in the first place. Brexit affects everyone, so logic would imply all political parties (as all elected mps have constituents they represent) would be involved. Guess the Tories now can lay blame on Corbyn if all goes tits up, which judging by previous form, is a given.
The same reason Brexit happened in the first place. A broken parliament.
Because May wanted to control it and went ahead on her own.
May left it to the last minute, I speculate on purpose in order to force her deal through.
But as her deal has been heavily rejected this clearly hasn't worked, regardless of her motives.
Cross party negotiations are easier to do with more time and this would have resulted in a softer brexit which I suspect isn't what May wants.
By leaving it late it's harder to get a cohesive plan together and a hard brexit scenario is more likely.
The problem is blame. Regardless of your opinion and belief, there should never be a sense of blame. If you're working on a team project; you may have different opinions or beliefs and you work together to find the best solution to a problem. It doesn't matter if that doesn't work in the end; just that you planned, debated and came to the best decision at the time. The government has an extremely poor mindset where they don't want to accept blame for certain decisions and this can prevent decisions that may be the superior option. This creates a toxic, childish environment to work within and this is a fundamental problem in politics.
@@lachyt5247 Since you seem to make reference to the (american?) federal government I assume you want to generalize to the concept of government in general.
In that case I'd like to inform you, that this is not a general rule. Not only is bipartisan deliberation in commitees an important part of parliamentary work around the world, there have been cases in which coalitions included more parties then were needed to achieve majority. Most notably the swiss government which typically includes members from all relevant parties in parliament. The concept in general is called Consociationalism, the approach that as many voices as possible should be heard.
Just an honest question as a non-brit:
WHAT?!
The house deciding the timetable.
The house takes control of the extension discussion.
How much longer until Theresa May is made to leave? At this point, MPs are voting more to take control from the government than they are to actually deal with Brexit.
We are long past the point where the only reason for theresa may still being in office is the simple fact that no one wants that hot bloody mess that is brexit, because it's career suicide.
I hadn't considered that, but you're probably right.
@@ithemba Just about. The only person who seems to want the chair is Boris, who isn't exactly popular outside of the hardliners.
I've never voted Tory and never will. Neither will I ever vote Labour.
How do you legally stop a 'no-deal' scenario unilaterally without accepting the only possible deal? How is it not clear to parliament, that the EU determines if it will be a hard deal or not when the deal on the table is voted away. The EU won't come back with a different deal but it's like they're counting on being able to leverage the EU. The same EU who has clearly expressed time and time again: "Just get on with it, we're done."
You stop it lgally by forcing a revoke of brexit entirely. Which has been the most likely outcome all the time anyway.
Well, the legal options are:
Revoke Article 50
Accept what ever deal the government can negotiate with the EU
Exit with No Deal
So we can take the No Deal off the table, then decide the EU deal is not acceptable, so revoke Article 50. And because the referendum was not legally binding, legally we can.
And if you want to hold the results of the referendum that closely to your heart, remember that the Leave campaign broke campaign laws.
@@Coldheart322 even if the referendum was legally binding parliament could still revoke article 50, it would simply then have to enact it again at a later date , it was rushed anyway, which is why it's revocation or doubling by other means has became inevitable. & revoking article 50 would not mean the end of brexit, far from it.
@@Marcusjnmc If the referendum had passed 51.9 - 48.1 to remain we'd still not have heard the end of brexit.
@@Marcusjnmc It can't revoke in bad faith as per the ECJ decision if it revokes it must be an intentional and unequivocal decision to remain, to make it not look like bad faith their would at least have to go through the motions of letting grass roots campaigning build up from scratch again so they can claim they were forced into it. Of course most of the leave voters will be dead by then and they are being replaced by mostly remainers so if they did actually have the balls to do it that would be it pretty much.
Thank you for all your hard work on keeping us informed!
It's been 10 minutes since you uploaded has anything changed since then?
Hahaha
Yes, a 360° turn of events unfolded
Max the Atheist yes, but it was hit by a 180° turn five minutes later
A valid question for an invalid situation.
Parliament are voting on a motion to return to their primordial homes in the Themes
Some dedicated coverage so far. Thanks for all the hard work in explaining things
You guys need a vacation and some rest.
The guys have to be commended for their hard work. A well deserved lengthy vacation with plenty of rest is due.
perhaps they can take a short holiday in Spain... No, wait, Italy.... Oh, shit. Maybe somewhere outside the the EU would be more sensible at the moment.
Tell that to the bloody commons.
Dantaniean I feel like someone should start a gofundme page for a holiday for these lads after Brexit.
I have never seen anyone in my life work as hard as the people at TLDR! You need a long holiday! I'd say 1 year off...
"This is clearly not the end of the process..." that's the part I could figure out for myself actually!
Bless you guys
Does the speaker remember the name of every constituency and every MP for each constituency?
Probably, he spends every day of his work in there. You get used to MP's names and constituencies and habits over time.
Do this for enough years and you'll probably remember most faces/names by heart.
Yes he does, he has talked about it himself in HoC behind the scenes videos.
@@Madhattersinjeans Two MPs failed to do it properly last night, and they're also supposed to work there all of the time.
MPs can't spend all of their time in London when they have their own constituency business to do.
@@Madhattersinjeans I don't think it is only because he got "used to it" - I think it is John Bercow's commitment and dedication to his job, that results in his knowledge and his ability to memorise and deliver it correctly - that kind of dedication comes from his personal hard work and being grounded because of good upbringing. I just recently found out that his father was a taxi driver - that in itself is a decent indicator to know the well grounded background for people of John Bercow's age group.
Public: None of us was in the house where it happened,
the House where it happened,
the House where it happened...
I will only watch this channel until the 100,000th Brexit video (due in 2050).
The 1993 Betty Boothroyd vote was found to be a miscount and her vote was expunged. That put it back to a vote in 1990.
In 1990? So they took the results of a previous vote instead of the more recent one with the miscount? Or did they hold another vote after?
Carl-Michael he means the last time there was an actual 50/50 split was in 1990 rather than 1994
*1993
@@thec-m the 1993 one was fine, once properly counted the government were ahead anyway by one vote so Boothroyd's was discarded.
The previous vote requiring a speaker to vote was 1990.
Referendum 2016. The choice on the ballot paper, Stay or Leave the EU. There was nothing about making rubbish deals. Our MPs ratified Article 50 making our vote law, so wtf are they doing. May stated that, deal or no deal we would leave on 29.3.19, so wtf is she playing at. With the EU running this country our MPs had but one task on their 'to-do' list, Brexit. What an utter F**K UP. God help us all because these bastards won't.
And the circus continues. TLDR is prob making a bank out of this mess. At least someone is gaining something out of this situation.
Remeber when the brits were so sure that the EU would collapse with brexit? Who is collapsing now lmao
@Daedalus well, uk politics doesn't seem to stable and healthy, neither does social cohesion in the country.
I wouldn't call it collapse but the eu is weathering the storm a lot better then the uk, which is exactly the opposite of what was predicted by the leave camp would happen.
They earn it though, this is a valuable resource and it is a lot of very hard work.
I just hope they can keep the momentum going with something else when this brexit nonsense is done with.
@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 what exactly is stable politics any good for ? when politics becomes too stable you get unopposed majorities that don't have to actually answer to anybody, or entrenched opposed camps that only ever have any interest in discrediting the other, a split parliament that Actually has to work across the house in the interests of all people of the nation is in my eyes an extremely good thing.
@Daedalus the government represents the people. Pretty normal way to organise anything involving large numbers of people.
If you do not like what your government does in europe, elect a government that does represent whatever it is you want.
This stuff isn't rocketscience.
Uh, did you mean April instead of March in the intro?!!!
I think he was tried, because the text said 4rd
Well considering the text says "March 4rd", I think they are way too tired at this point.
It's hard to make an episode/day of a soap opera..
@@danib577 I'm tired of all of this and I have a good nights sleep and only watch the videos, I don't make them. At the end of the day there is clear intent to compromise the United Kingdom with a bad EU deal and May's insistent pursuit of this is perplexing so much so that I can only to come to the following conclusions a) She's been bribed by big business to keep the UK in the EU b) She knows something that we don't about No Deal (very doubtful) c) She's insane.
@@LowPolyPixel I thought it was my birthday today but apparently it's march 4rd today, not april 4th so no birthday for me ):
The "referendum " was LEAVE OR REMAIN, NOT-DEAL OR NO DEAL
@Tsanko Tsankov Did it say that on the ballet? Or do you think maybe some people thought you’d be able to negotiate new trade deals before destroying all the one’s you had?
Keep up the good work guys! You are my go to news outlet for brexit and I cannot wait for your up,lads so I can get caught up with everything that’s happened
lmao dude you seriously need to get some sleep
@@lachyt5247 Well done you came on a video you don't like just to be a bitchy little snowflake and then you got owned. Keep making the world a better place one arrogant comment at a time brother.
What the hell happened here lol all I said was Jack needs some sleep cus' he was up at 4am again finishing a video.
Oh hey Jono
@Sven Tempest
Nah mate, forget town crier, messenger pigeons is where it's at.
Guillotine lmao whatup Stan
The fact that you need to introduce a TLDR on political news in such a fashion really shows how dire the situation is…
Thank you, guys. I was unable to follow the news yesterday, but your video provided a great summary to what lollies like a very lengthy and complicated process.
Brexit will go through only when the speaker will shout *ORDEEEER* no more than once.
in the end this needs to come back to a public referendum. thats the only democratic solution left. give us the choice of deal, no deal, or stay.
What about a detailed video on the Good Friday agreement?
With the specific effects of a no deal Brexit on it.
Attempt #7
(get a little sleep first though ^^)
it would be fitting if they would upload that video on the 19th of April. then it will be Good Friday.
@@sirBrouwer or next Wednesday...
@@GrasshopperKelly Why next Wednesday?
Sure a video about the Good Friday agreement online on Good Friday would be fitting.
But if you have a other more fitting reason then sure share it.
@@sirBrouwer it was signed on the 10th of April 1998
Yes please
At what point are people going to stop and say; Ok, we made a mistake, time to cancel this whole mess and return to the drawing board and try again when we have actual plans on the table for how to do this.
Study your local MPS & vote them out at your next local election they are not worth the money we pay them SIMPLE
Mine voted for the People's Vote. But we'll lose her if there's another election, because we've been Gerrymandered and will now be two Tory constituencies rather than one Labour one.
I definitely will the local treason party member has been consistently voting against protecting this country from the disaster capitalists.
Unless one is in Buckingham, since until Bercow resigns as the Speaker, only extreme fringe groups like the racist (as admitted by their former leader Griffin) BNP and the Christian Party (who hold one extreme policy of outlawing all religious beliefs that aren't Christian (including atheist views)) will run against him, effectively making his seat unopposed. And most of Buckingham won't vote for those groups, no matter how bad things might get.
I wanted to let you know how grateful I am for your videos. I married a Brit and got my citizenship in 2011. We are currently living outside of the UK and news about Brexit is hard to come by here. Your channel keeps me up to date on all the news. Thank you so much for the great reporting and please keep it up even after Brexit!
The last days of the British government
I can definitely see the government crumbling with this
this one anyway, I really don't see it lasting the full term
Kuulpb the day the cookie crumbled
I'm Patreoning on the condition that you get some rest when all this is done, sir, good gracious.
The sacrifices you are making truly astonishing and we thank you for them.
Oh I get it now, when it's a majority of 1 everything is golden .... right.
Dumocrusay! /Brexiteer
1 or 50 more is still more
Unless it's the Brexit vote, because obviously the difference was so marginal we should have another vote. And then another one. Until it's 51% against and then it'll be fine.
Wait you mean that the berixt vote of 2016 thatalso only barely passed wasn't democratic? Hmmmm?
The idiots replying to this thinking 1.5+ million is not a significant majority. But think 1 is. Haha idiots.
I never really realised how quickly you get your videos out, it’s incredible!
Is everyone excited to participate in EU elections?
Thanks for your great work on this! Very grateful to have these summaries so quickly!
How are people resigning because the two parties are working together shows what some peoples true agendas are and it’s not in the interest of the people
The fact that it is now known that the NHS and the government have failed to stockpile enough vital medication for a no deal, and so many MPs still voted for a no deal, shows they don't give a s*** about the people.
To give them some slack, I think that it is only part of the reason. Other reasons include that they believe the labour party has deliberately caused disruption to cause chaos within the Tories party, May has shown to be weak begging the opposition for help, thirdly going against the majority of her own cabinet 14 voted for no deal, 10 against. Whether these are legitimate reasons are up for you to decided but I thought I'd shed some light on the situation.
Well labour is trying to stop Brexit which is truly against the people
@@TheZombieslayer2002 yes the will of 14%..
Sooo agenst. (Pionts at 6 million petition to just cancel Brexit.)
@@starlinguk Oh but they tried you know like they tried with giving money to the company with no ferries, they set aside money to stockpile medications in the warehouses that they don't actually have. Course I could have told them that this would be the case Britain is a modern economy with just in time logistics systems much of the warehouse space was redeveloped as it's far more costly to warehouse in bulk when you have IT systems that can handle doing everything just in time.
"No deal" being the default if no other arrangement is decided upon, "legally preventing no deal" can only be done by coming to another arrangement. Enacting a new law to prevent no deal is enacting a law to legalise ignoring the result of the referendum.
"is enacting a law to legalise ignoring the result of the referendum."
It's already legal to ignore the result of the referendum, seeing as it was advisory.
@@PGraveDigger1 It could be argued that our entry into the EEC was not legal either.
It would be so much easier if Cersei was there.
I keep hoping the dragons will appear.
Correction: MP's pass vote to stop brexit (they're working on that now).
It's almost like parliament are 70% remainers or something.... Oh wait.
All leave supporters fled the scene when the results came in or where voted out in the election.
@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 out of curiosity why did they flee? Which MPs are you thinking of?
If that was true, why is "revoke a50" and "new referendum" motions voted down over and over again? 70% majority would have gotten either of those passed without a problem.
Jason
They fled or refused to take positions of leadership because they always knew it was impossible to deliver.
Nigel Farage fucking resigned from UKIP leadership immediately after the referendum, which should have been a glorious moment for him and his party... Jacob Rees Mogg equally has no designs on the PM's job bc he also knows Brexit can't be delivered and prefers to score political points by criticising the government instead.
@Blood A second referendum or even a general election would be democracy. If you trust the public more than the current Parliament, you should want one of those. If you don’t, I don’t see why you’d trust a 2% margin generic “Leave” vote from two years ago more than one taken today. Probably because you know remain voters would actually turn out knowing that Brexit could actually happen, and a vote better reflecting the public’s desires would reject “Leave”, even if it was still done two years ago.
Thank you so much for this update. It's quite hard to follow these events yourself and actually understand what they mean, even on tge day when it's happening. Will definitely support you. ❤️
My prayers go out to the history students of the future, good luck remembering all this shit
It'll get condensed. Do you really think history was as neat and simple as it looks from today?
I don't think EU will be giving another short extension. In fact i am certain that there will be no short extension.
And i have a doubt that MP's will accept the EU terms so long extension is probably unlikely.
If there is not gonna be any extensions, then April 12 is gonna be the day that UK leaves the EU.
And it will be without a deal.
Due to shared incompetence MP, government & PM got what they never wanted.
The people sitting on the platform just watching.
I salute the commitment and hard work TLDR puts into producing these videos - MUCH RESPECT. Having said that, these videos would not be half as interesting without John Berkow - the man is an absolute LEGEND!
@hoodiewoman louisiana I agree.
I find it amazing that you pump out these videos concerning brexit in this short time and they are actually getting better and more informative all the time. Keep up the good work and I really like the inclusion of the debate footage and you pointing out stuff.
if Diane Abbot had her way we would have left on the 32nd April
Then she would say I misspoke I meant er um the 39th
She remembers because it's her birthday 😜😜😜
Thanks for keeping us in the Know with easy to understand
Yo Britain, you really going to write history with Brexit. Gonna be a Joke for hundreds of years, but still.
Most of us don't want this but some twats do and are willing to be a joke for their selfishness
We hope not buuut
This whole circus will be used in the educational system for many decades to come
@AzerGhost16 We sure are having a lot of fun on our side, half the brits really are a very "special" case
Talked to most of the population have ya. Selfishness? You mean voting on a basis of sovereignty? While "Most of you" voted to be financially and economically secure. Sounds like some self preservation shit to me which is pretty selfish as well. Guess we are all selfish. Welcome to the funny pages of history fellow clown.
Well done getting these videos out so quickly. Can't believe how much of a shambles this whole situation is
It is in the running of being the greatest embarrassment of the entire history of the United Kingdom of Britainnia and Scotland
@@haruhisuzumiya6650 Scotland is in the UK, and we voted to remain that way... Its the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.
these videos became a part of my morning routine, this is so much thrilling (and really sad)
Everybody's talking about the 4 March/April goof... no one's saying a thing about 4:21 ?? I mean, that's the limpest "Orda orda" I think I've ever heard from Bercow... my dude... is he feeling okay?
Dude, nothing is more important than your health. Get some rest!!!
Thanks for all the work
If they can't agree on a deal then no deal is the only choice. The problem is them. They've had 2 or 3 years to agree on something.
Bless you for explaining so succinctly every single time. You're doing an amazing job.
JFC, this process makes me feel like the U.S. Legislature is almost functional by comparison.
The only issue i see here is that they are voting as if the EU would accept anything they decide.
Brexit: Breaking Physical boundaries since 2016th
Why MPs stand after question? What does it signify?
So early to the video that it hasn't been processed in any other resolution than 360p and says "No Views" 😅
Considering how MPs seem to change their minds on brexit at opportune times for them, it seems quite hypocritical of May to keep referring to the "will of the people" on a 3 year old referendum that was "won" by somewhat tight margins, and not allow the people to change their minds.
Just chiming in with an outside perspective, and I think it would overall be a loss for the rest of the EU to see the UK leave our union.
Just get the Queen to fix this mess....
linuxares If this were Australia the Governor General would’ve sacked the Parliament by now and called another election.
The Queen is at the centre of the mess.
The queen is just a tourist attraction
No. She'd just go off her head. Much like the rest of England.
Love the longer content, thanks!
Honestly, before this channel I could not get my head around brexit. I feel like I can understand it a lot better now. Thank you :)
Why do they tell "yeaaaahhh" every time someone is done talking?
To show support and approval, because they are not supposed to clap their hands.
Fantastic channel. Needs more exposure
Come on guys. MPs just didn't know what they were voting in triggering Article 50
Your content really helps me a lot to understand Brexit especially since I work in news and I need to catch up with what I missed and what I don't understand. Thank you!
"I work in news....I don't understand"
Accurate summary of the main stream media.
@@FartInhalerSlamPoetry You mean being honest and admitting that they don't have all the facts? Didn't think that one through, did you Calburno...
@@FartInhalerSlamPoetry You do realised that I don't work for the British news mate? I work in Asia and trust me; no one understands what the heck is going on with Brexit 😂
lmao the brits dont understand shit of whats going on with brexit and criticize you that live on the other half of the planet
@@Cortanakya I work for a news outlet in Asia and Europe is quite far away from us. So, we have to try and understand British laws, the significance of EU, etc. So it's not especially easy for us to digest it and make the audience understands due to the complexity of the topic. 😅
3:03 - If only the mics weren't hanging from the ceiling, that'd be the perfect time to drop them.
It is very easy to understand the strong desire not to end up in a No Deal solution. I also have a very strong desire not to end up there. But if the UK is to leave, and the current deal is not acceptable, and bits of it need changing, I’m not sure telling the EU that we will never agree to a No Deal is the best way of getting them to agree any changes. If I was an EU negotiator I would now refuse to agree to any changes we propose as I would know we couldn’t use our ultimate weapon.
Nobody ever has proposed a realistic alternative to the backstop. I understand why some people don't like it... but without an alternative, what should be done?
Bingo! They couldn't have done better if they were working for Junker.
The EU also dont want a No Deal, because their economy is strongly entangled with the British. If the UK leave the EU with a No Deal it wont just hurt them, but also export giants like Germany.
I am no expert in Brexit, im only repeating what i heard german experts say.
@@Pyriold the alternative is very simple, it's simply also extremely unpalatable to the conservatives as they've spent years garnering a support base around anti immigration policies, retain free movement & a close partnership with europe as we exit participation in european governance.
1ultronix1 I think that is correct. A No Deal is a Not Good Deal for either side. I think the current Deal is better for the EU than it is for UK, in some areas. I don’t think it is 100% a poor deal for us, only about 5% is. But if we want to tweak that final 5%, so that we both have some sort of deal, forbidding a No Deal is not, in my view, the best way to achieve this.
No worries on getting the speaker video done. You guys are run off your feet, and I know that I really appreciate your continued effort here. 👍🏻
This video took longer to make than the legislation took to pass! Politics is crazy!!!
In the case this bill becomes law, the PM is being asked to wrestle the EU with their hands tied to her back. It will only leave a few options. This is, in case the EU does not allow for any extension and insists on its deal, then May will be faced with three options. A) Accept the deal on the table (what the Pairlament has rejected numerous times), B) Have a NO Deal at hand (what will be then illegal to accept) or C) to Revoke Art. 50 and participate in the EU elections (what would mean Brexit would not happen any time soon).
So in essence Pairlament is left with the option: "accept the deal" or "revoke art 50 for the time being".
So what is it going to be?🤔
Just leave already.
You messing around is doing you more damage than no-deal itself.
Once again a great and informative video, thanks!
The close vote results really nerve wrecking! Same vote= WOWWW
Let me get this right - a law was passed by parliament that said we leave on 29th Mach 2019 - which has been ignored.
A law is being passed which says we cannot leave without a deal - and it has to be obeyed.
I think they are making it up as they go along.
MP’s bent on giving up sovereignty to a foreign power...... leaving the EU without a deal is the best possible deal.
someone needs to change the deal please
Great Scott Marty, we've gone back to the future!
11:32 The folder says "Copper Bill" instead of "Cooper Bill". Thought I misread it but noticed on the second look.
Well then!
No deal is ruled out and the EU-exit agreement is ruled out too!
Why keep up the charade if MPs decided by omission to remain?
@@EricLing64 Except donkey can carry water
And donkeys can play in central midfield for Manchester United
Remaining would require the prime minister to revoke article 50. I can't see her doing that.
They are trying to save face and not explicitly say to their citizen's "well you voted for brexit which was a very shitty plan to begin with because literally all our solutions where flat out worse than where we started, so we are just going to go ahead and say no because you guys are really fucking stupid". Obviously you can see how doing such a thing would pretty much end a career, even if it is the only logical choice. So they are instead playing chicken hoping that it is the EU who will cancel the thing, so they can save face and put "blame" on the EU. But the EU understood this and now they are essentially forcing the UK to either accept their stupidity or collapse because of it.
Revoking article 50 has to be done prior to April 12th so you can arrange elections for the EU parliament. I don't see this for various reasons.
Thank you for your dedication!