Chess On Women's Day
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at:
/ discord
🎵 Music used in this video:
Xomu - Last Dance:
• Xomu - Last Dance
Xomu - Walpurgis Night
• Xomu - Walpurgis Night
#chess #ChessBut
Simp is not a coward. Instead, he's a fool for ending his own video.
I agree. The video should have ended when he moved the bishop to h3. The opponent’s knight couldn’t capture it since it was pinned in place by his new queen
@@DharshM0Nah, that's fine, if a capture exposes the enemy king, it's still a capture. I also believe Simps primary goal was to deliver checkmate by moving the Queen next to enemy King, where Queen is protected by another piece. Thus it can be captured, yet still checkmate.
Simp ended his video on his last move though
@@danielhoang289 Being within range and being able to capture is not the same
The ultimate choice we will all have to make someday: to be a fool, or to be a coward
@@wendellgutierrez761 Sounds like fake Sun Tzu quote, NGL
Sacrificing a woman, so that you will be able to immediately take an opponents piece on the back rank and receive a new, younger woman should be called the Leonardo DiCapture
Brilliant move, sir
Just take the queen, he might resign
totally not a coward
Simp is not a coward
Simp is not a coward
Technically, simp can still take the queen since that square is control by white king so it should be legal.
Not taking the queen is cowardly.
4:45 The queen is defended! Just take it and wait for resignation
"nothing controversial here" was very funny when the knight was pinned
It was pretty funny, but I feel like that's within the spirit of the rules. Like the only way to give checkmate was with a piece that's attacked by a pinned piece, or with a piece that's attacked by the king but defended.
@@JivviWrong. Checkmate with a pawn, or a discover checkmate that puts a piece in danger or by moving a pawn.
That's three ways that are completely legal according to the challenge. Very hard to pull off though.
@@plzletmebefrank True, discovered checkmate could definitely do it too. Nice catch. I feel like checkmate with a pawn comes under what I meant about a piece attacked by the king, since a pawn would also have to be defended to give checkmate. Promoting a pawn to give mate on the back rank could also do it, since it's a pawn when it moves, but a piece when it gives mate.
@@Jivvipawn checkmate would work because pawns are exempt fron the rules (otherqise challenge is failed move 1)
This game looks like a genuine 100 rated.
“This knight can capture my bishop”
Lol, lmao.
Dude did not acknowledge the pin lol
Mission accomplished! Pawns should be exempt from rules, even if they change gender.
So even when you change your gender you're still what you're born with?
@@Bennie_Tziek you're still you, no matter your gender
I knew there will be comments calling this sexist
Just joking.
It is no longer a pawn, but a piece.
@@Bennie_Tziekyou were always the gender you prefer, but your past is still there. doesn't change anything, though.
How are you supposed to checkmate your opponent if your piece can always be captured? You either have to create some kind of discovered checkmate or checkmate with a pawn. Right?
Yep.
or you can checkmate by snuggling a defended piece up next to their king (probably in the endgame)
i also see pawn changes gemder checkmate.
Or moving up next to the king checkmate
checkmate with queen, rook or bishop near the king. King can take it, but then it is dead.
Technically, a defended piece shouldn't be allowed to move to check the king unless the opponent has non-king pieces or pawns to take the attacker with, though. If the piece is defended, the king isn't allowed to take it by game rules, so it wouldn't be a square where the piece could be taken for the challenge rules.
“Absolutely nothing controversial about this move” sure thing, simp. lol
You had bishop takes queen likely followed by a resignation.
Kill a woman on International womens' day? Simp would never.
That game was actually hilarious. Just the right amount of blunder, coincidences, and "not controversial" moves.
We were thouroughly entertained. Misison accomplished. ^^
Rare instance of the opponent blundering a "queen" instead of a "woman"
on international women's day, women are not blundered, they are crowned (and then blundered)
3:56 this breaks the rules. It's not about the square being controlled; It's about your piece being able to be captured. That knight is hard-pinned and can't capture the bishop.
Which is why he claimed that it wasn't controversial at all.
womp womp
If a piece can never move to a squre it can not be captured, then a piece can never move to checkmate. Only a pawn or a pawn promotion can result in checkmate. This was basically impossible.
There are also discovered checks and checkmates.
and resignations.
like - capture the queen with the bishop (legal move, opponent can recapture with the king) but he may resign.
@@lukecox6317If the king is in check and some piece can capture the piece moved last, then it is not checkmate. Because, by definition, there are no valid moves from a checkmate.
@@EliasHasle discovered checks and checkmates by definition aren't delivered by the piece that moves. If a knight moved out of the way of a queen and onto a square under attack, and the queen is what delivers checkmate, then it is valid.
@@lukecox6317 But the challenge didn't say "attacked", it said "can be captured". If moving it causes the opponent to have to move the king or block with another piece, by definition that piece did not move some place it can be captured, unless that "some place" is next to the king on an escape route for it.
3:02 King: Honey, I must tell you that as my dear wife and the queen of this nation you are...
3:36 ...replaceable. Goodbye!
I was hoping for a monotone unexcited "the r ooooooo k"
I love when he brakes the rules on the last turn.
Can you play more drawback chess?
☝ I second this!
Why is he so fascinated with people's cats?
I wonder how many people saw that
that bishop to h3 move was 100% cheating since the knight cannot take because the pin, it would literally be an illegal move
now do the pieces really can't phisically move or do they just honor the king too much to take?
it was not cheating, the challenge doesnt say when the opponent has to capture
@Sol, That was the joke, yes
He noticed that so I'll let him pass
“To a square where they “can” be captured”. 100% cheating. But that is what this channel is now. Cheating the challenges. Makes it much less interesting.
Mission failed successfully
So the moral of the story is: Don't call yourself stupid, Think twice.😎😏
I've never wanted chess simp to break the challenge rules so bad.
Thank you for the checkmate, it was satisfying.
I mean, alternatively, taking the queen and hoping for a resignation might have worked as well. The king can attack the bishop after all.
3:45 => this is almost a "oh no my queen" moment.
4:00 => well... there IS something controversial about the knight being pinned... but I'll let it slide.
on 3:53 you should've added the "MM" batch next to your rating
King should be exempted, hard to imagine he would go to attacked square
I'd say that's a win
I agree
Mission failed succesfully.
Tbh it was more satisfying that Simp broke the rules to deliver checkmate than stick to it
ANTI SPOILER BARRIER
I would call the challenge “Chess, but you are trying to play Antichess/Giveaway”
My thought: capture queen with bishop, pawn takes c5, push h5 pawn until it can capture knight which can't move due to being pinned, then capture knight to have 2 queens. If they still don't surrender and haven't moved king to safety, checkmate with Qf1 ending the video.
Ofc, that leaves 5 turns for them to do something about it, but a 100-rated player couldn't possibly do anything meaningful in that time, right?
The thing on the left is actually pretty good lol
Isn't checkmate impossible with this challenge? Since whichever piece you put the king in check with has to have been moved to a space that he can capture on. I guess maybe a discovered checkmate still works, but that's so difficult to do with the restriction
Looks to me that the black king killed off his queen in order to remarry.
I'll allow it. Maybe, conceptually, the game checks for Checkmate before the challenge checks for "is this piece in range of capture by an enemy piece?".
Actually, come to think of it, I really am okay with always taking advantage of mate-in-1 opportunities regardless of challenge rules, unless the challenge is to deliver checkmate in a specific way. Like, you got all the way up to "you can choose to win the game immediately" within the challenge rules. Go win it.
Man, that was a very hard challenge
The Magnus opening by the opponent
couldve mached the pawn forward to capture the knight and promote
I think we can very safely say this game has NEVER happened before
4:02 actually that knight can't take the bishop because it is pinned, so that move is illegal and the video should have been ended here
I'm inclined to believe the Simp is aware of that and that's why he made a long ironical explanation of why it is "definitely legal according to the rules".
Stick to the challenge and play it out! I'd like to see the endgame with the restrictions, that's what's interesting.
I thought of this like 30 seconds into the video... How would you ever force a checkmate under these conditions?
The least controversial video on youtube? This chess player just won a game of chess without making any controversial moves even a little bit, on international women's day.
Could have just taken his queen and forced a resigns... didnt haffa bail THAT early
At least he win this one.
Certified MM moment
Since you previously said you don't let women fight, that would mean you don't play with Queens, so the achievement would instead have to be called something like "Succession of Viziers".
My favorite ending
technically a checkmate in this challenge is literally impossible (unless i'm missing something), since your pieces must always land on squares where the opponent can capture, so the enemy could always just capture the piece checking the king. Another strategy would have been to take his queen to try and provoke a resination
Checkmate with pawn or pawn promotion would work.
By the way: It's actually impossible within this challenge to do any Checkmate except a pure Pawn Checkmate [edit: or a discovered Checkmate, I guess], because if you can only move your Pieces to positions where they can be taken on the next move, you can never inescapably Check his King with them - there's always going to be the option to take out any of the threatening Pieces.
Except for checkmates where the checkmating piece is right next to the king while being defended by another piece. However, setting that up would be rather difficult.
All squares next to the king are valid squares too, even if king cannot take it back because it's defended. Same rule than the pinned knight.
@@PauGarraf Defended by what? Okay, by pawns, maybe. If it's defended by another piece, that piece needs to have landed somewhere where it could have been taken. I _guess_ it could still happen if the opponent made a mistake somewhere along the lines, but you can't build a strategy around that.
Yeah, this time the (not pawns) is very much required^^
4:03 how can a pinned knight capture on that field? ;P
Noooo, not my catttt
You can actually wait take the queen because the king can still take back, triggering a resignation is also an idea...
That's what a coward would do
Honestly it is intensely gratifying to see someone who played like that not get a free win just because of the challenge. 1. h3? 2.h4?? 3.h5??? Come on.
Hmm I think Bh3 was illegal because the knight was pinned so it couldn't actually capture the bishop 🤔
Yay, new hard challeng
I laughed.
How are you supposed to beat a 100 with this challenge when they will 95% of the time capture whenever given the chance?
checkmate is literally impossible. if it is a checkmate they cannot capture any pieces legally.
Wasn't the checkmating move illegal? His queen was not under attack when he captured the knight
I guess capturing should be exception
Yeah I think unless specifically stated as part of the challenge (e.g you must checkmate with a knight) you are allowed to break the rules if it is checkmate. Besides this was near impossible otherwise.
I would argue that the captures can be exempted from rules since the challenge explicitly states that you can only MOVE to squares that opponent can capture on
Capture is also a move. The challenge however doesnt say WHEN opponent has to capture, you just have to provide the piece.
Video 92 of asking simp to play fps chess
Why didn’t you just say “F**k the rules” when taking that knight with your queen?
you made a fool out of yourself
is it even possible?
he had enough of this sh*t
Why end the game? The queen can be taken. However move 13 was a fail anyway.
hilarious
Truly a100 rated game 😂
Dude why didn’t you take the queen????
Successfully failed...
Cheating with an other woman on Women's Day sounds bad.
On another side, he let her woman dies before getting a new one, so technically, it's not really cheating.
ANTI-SPOILER BARRIER
Capture isn't just a move, right?
Checkmate can only be with a pawn.
*technically* it was! Just slightly prettier.
or a discovered check
Technically the king can take pieces that check it (up close), even when pieces are defended; that square is still controlled by the king
@@Gugnar678 I would argue not. If the only way to take a piece is with an illegal move, that piece cannot be taken.
@@Gugnar678
Nice idea but the challenge specifically says "where they can be captured by your opponent", so since capturing the piece with the king would be against the rules I don't think this works as a loophole
Wait why didn't he take the queen?
I consider challenge completed, because if a piece had to be capturable in a square they move to it would be impossible to checkmate and win. An exception should've been made for this.
missing "fuck the rules" days
3:59 His knight cannot capture because he is pinned to his king by your queen. You blundered your video.
3:59 technically he can't, since he's pinned by the queen
The challenge doesnt say when your opponent has to capture
@@kingyodah5415the challenge says “Chess, but you can only move pieces (not pawns) to a square where they can be captured by your opponent.”
And last time I checked, a piece can’t be captured by a pinned piece.
@@wittingcave5591thats why i said the challenge doesnt say WHEN your opponent has to capture. The challenge doesnt say if it has to be in next move or 10 moves later. Your job is to keep a piece on a square where it can be captured. Once a piece is unpinned it can capture and THAT matters.
@@kingyodah5415 If you want to stretch the words that badly, then I can see at least one way to just ignore the challenge.
@@kingyodah5415 I understand the sentiment, but by that reasoning every single square on the chess-board is OK. Because in the future there can be a position where the square you want to go to is attacked.
What I mean is this. The knight is pinned, so it cannot capture on that move. You argue that once the king moves the knight could capture, so it's OK.
Now imagine a different situation. Play knight h6 on the first move. I argue that once the pawn on d2 moves, the bishop could capture, so it's OK by the same reasoning.
Anyhow, I personally am completely okay with Simp loosening up on the rules there in this case, but it did contradict the original phrasing. There's been plenty of times where he interpreted challenges harder than they were worded.
What a fool, ending your own video -- you could have taken the queen and continued the game.
That was literally Impossible unless oponent resigns. I mean you cannot get checkmate in a square where you can be captured
The knight is pinned on move 13, u r a cheater and a coward.
If this comment disappear, I'm getting problem on youtube rn for some reason
Lmao this challenge sounds "fun'
I feel as though you should make the transphobic argument of that was a pawn not a piece just because it calls itself a queen it is still a pawn and therefor mission accomplished.
terrible
you lost the challenge dislike unsub
First.
I fully support simp being allowed to make an "illegal" move if it literally wins him the game because even though the video ends he already won so I always say it's fair game especially for challenges so impossible as this one that if you can get to a mate in one position then I think he deserves the win