What D&D Alignment is Spiderman? (Andrew Garfield)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 сер 2024
- Today we take a look at the Amazing Spiderman movies!~ This was a surprisingly controversial spiderman that people either tolerated or hated. Personally, I thought he was fine, but a little weird and bizarre. Hope you guys enjoyed No Way Home
Writers: Stuart and Cinemafreak
Editor: Xthedarkone
TheLoadingCrew is a husband and wife team made up of 2 independent artists. The husband Stuart is in charge of the UA-cam channel and producing video content while the wife Alexandria produces the Web Comics Momma CQ and Jelly Realms Adventures.
On this channel we play Pokemon Tabletop Adventures, Pathfinder, and a few other games with some of our friends like Xthedarkone, Lady_nanaki, megami33, hbi2k, and MasakoX of Team Four Star. Please be sure to Like, Subscribe, and share on Social Media.
If you want to follow us feel free to follow on us on Twitter or Twitch. You could also hang out with us on our Discord server or find our convention Schedule on our website at LoadingCrewCrafts.com. While you are there, pick up a plushie of our RPG themed jellyfish.
Like what you see? ► Subscribe / theloadingcrew
Discord ► / discord
Twitch ► / theloadingcrew
Our Twitter ► / loadingcrew
Our Website ► www.loadingcrewcrafts.com/
Our Patreon ► / theloadingcrew
#dnd #spiderman #nowayhome - Ігри
Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man is actually a pretty accurate modernization of Stan Lee's original run of the comics. Peter was kind of a massive dickweed in that series.
Yeah, he was sus
As someone who has read over 250 issues of the Amazing Spider-man comics yeah Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man is actually the most comic accurate adaptaion of the Spidey to be on screen.. Tom Holand's Spider-man oddly acts more like Miles Morales from the Ultimate Spider-man comics
Tbh spiderman in the very first comics started out a massive asshole for a few issues before Ben dies and he reevaluates his life, so this version does follow that idea of having peter being irresponsible for quite a while rather than quickly having to change.
I think the issue is that he continues being an asshole even after Ben's death, which feels like it undervalues the moment that is meant to be THE turning point. The moment when he changes from selfish asshole, to a man who wants to prevent further tragedy.
@@Lunacorva It's also the Issue that Peter is NOT Responcible for his uncle's Death. The robber tripped and dropped the gun. And Ben REALISTICALLY, would have backed away and not jumped for it like a fucking idiot! Ben killed HIMSELF. It's the same bullshit that's in Man of Steel, where in original superman lore his father dies of Cancer, a disease, something that even with all of Superman god's like power, he can't stop to save his father. But in Man of Steel, his father, for literally no reason, commits suicide because he wanted Superman to keep hidden and NEVER reveal himself to the world, aka to NEVER be a Hero and save others.
Both situations, the father and uncle kill themselves. The hero has NOTHING to do with it, and has no Responcibility. With for Superman was just upsetting, but for Spiderman was a down right fucking plothole and rage inducing. It's the core tenet of EVERY version of Spiderman, EVERY copy, Comic Book, Video Game, Spin Offs, Movies. Cartoons. ALL of them, have Peter's actions lead to his uncle's death. But in these movies, his actions did NOT lead to uncle's death.
Topped with all the other bullshit stuff that happens, and his complete assholeness, and never following good morals. I hate this incarnation of Spider Man over every other version I have ever seen. Even the original old school first ever cartoon Spider Man is a BETTER person than this little shit head.
@@Jirodyne Uncle Ben did what was morally right from the perspective of his morals, "If you can help people, you have a moral obligation to do those things!" that's why he jumped to stop the criminal even though his life was on the line
@@almas4663 "If you can help people, you have a moral obligation to do those things!"
If he did nothing and the Robber got away, no one would have been hurt. Sure, money would have been stolen, but no one would have lost their lives.
His action endangered not just his OWN Life, which we see he lost, but by struggling with the gun, could have killed the Robber, or even a nearby innocent civilian.
What Ben did was wrong. But also doesn't account for the underline issue. Namely, Ben made his own choice, and got himself killed. Peter had NOTHING to do with his Death, with is a Core Issue of the character 'Spider-man'.
It would be like having Superman, be someone who wasn't Clark Kent, and wasn't from Krypton, and was just a normal, every day human.
It changes the character so much, that aren't even that character anymore. And that's what happened here. They created a Plothole. For Spider-man to be who he is as a character, he has to be responsible for "Someone's" Death. For Spiderman, it's his Uncle. For Miles in the Spiderverse Movie it's his Evil Uncle. For Spider-Gwen, it's the Death of her best friend peter parker.
The key point being, that their inaction/action caused the Death of something they loved very much, which motivates them to never let anyone else experience what they had, and become a superhero.
@@Jirodyne If Peter didn't had that argument with Ben, and ran off - Ben wouldn't needed to go out looking for him.
If Peter would've stopped the robber in the first place - none of it would've happened.
It's his fault mostly, not Ben's. Ben tried to do the right thing - to stop the criminal, to prevent the future robs, to commit justice
Andrew's Peter-Man is my favorite. There's something about the performance, you know?!
Ikr
The spider man was great the story and script not so much I hope he gets a 3rd film hi deserve it
Theloadingcrew: “Please tell me that he’s the most interesting character”
Me who has seen no way home: hahahahahaha
Yes. He is the best character
Andrew is so underrated honestly. His Spider-Man is quick, witty, and entertaining. He has the best combat with his acrobatic focused fighting style as opposed to Toby throwing hands and Tom being reliant on gadgets or gimmicks. His Peter Parker is also great with his nerdy ness and teen angst coming through beautifully. He does some legally and morally…questionable acts, yet the imperfection in his character is so well done. Just my two cents.
I totally agree all the spidermen are soo unique and cool
I think you were a bit too hard on Peter seeking revenge in the first movie (not the alignment changes, just the personal judgement). Tobey basically did the same in Spiderman 3 and he was a way more experienced spiderman at that point.
That may be true but he was also the under the influence of Venom the entire time.
Garfield is definitely my favorite Spider-Man.
Can we agree the first movie had a nat 20 Stan Lee cameo?
I actually rather like this punkish rebel of a Spiderman. He's more relatable to someone like me, since id probably do a lot of the same things if I got super powers and I know who killed a loved one. Plus it presents a greater less predictable learning curve. I personally love the Amazing movies. No matter how dumb the second one is.
Yeah, Dr. Connors's personality and motivations change due to, quite literally, Lizard Brain.
Well in my personal opinion, Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man in no way home was, to me, the objectively best one
Damn that part of TASM where Spiderman yelled at JJJ that his Pradas were at the cleaners along with his Hoodie and fuck you flip flops is definitely Neutral Good.
that took me a second but I got a laugh. thank you
This Spider-Man is a lot more realistic in my opinion. This is exactly what would happen if you gave a naive teenager too much power, just look at what happens to child stars in real life.
Spiderman was written as a hero teens could relate to but the in-canon Spiderman eventually became an adult that formerly teen fans could also continue to love. The MCU just wants to keep reaping in the new fans... so totally Disney of them, like new fans will stay after they (once they become older fans) also start getting the middle finger to them.
NOT REALLY A SPOILER BUT STILL FROM A GUY WHO WATCHED NWH
Andrew was definetly the most adorable of Spiders in the movie and a least in my theater his reveal had the biggest applauses from the crowd. Someone even shouted, "we love you Andrew". That was so heartwarming.
People are starting to appreciate Andrew as spidey and that makes me very happy
@@jackcouch8322 It`s like with Hayden Christensen as Ankin. I like how people can calm down after a decade or two.
For me this spiderman version is a what if : Spiderman was a DC property.
Everything feels so grim a dark , I was expecting a Batman's parents dying scene.
Ironically, this is what makes it more accurate to the comics.
Marvel comics have always been grittier with more flawed characters, DC comics have always been shinier with more idealistic characters.
@@ohwowitsthatguy9154 Yeah people that say that Marvel is too much light and DC to much dark probably only know the two from the movies
Great video.
I hope this is no spoiler since it was in the trailers but if death characters can come back in No Way Home I feel that we missed a chance to see a villain or at least antagonist Spider-Man.
Just imagine that Andrew-Spidey was trying to help fix the multiverse only to encounter a suddenly alive Gwen... And from that point on he tries to save her even if he puts the multiverse in danger.
...
Anyways... Another possible future alignment analisis could be of the Netflix series Inside Job, it has some funny and cool moments.
From what I understand... yeah, you're basically right. He's basically one of the best parts of the movie besides Ock and I love it.
Spoilers for No Way Home:
My girlfriend hated AG Spider-Man but the moment in No Way Home where he awkwardly apologised to Max because he wasn’t black made her full on giggle-snort so maybe AG was held back by the writing and tone of his series more than anything else.
He’s certainly warmer in NWH, expressing fondness for the other characters and acting genuinely heroic for the entire time he’s on screen - emphatically agreeing with Peters 1 & 2 about curing the villains rather than killing them, I’d say Peters 1-3 probably all end that movie on lawful good
for me Garfield is the best part of NWH He needs another movie
“POOR PETER PARKER”!!!!
(Picked-a-Pack-of-Pickled-Peppers)
(We all thought of this Joke)
Can you do the d&d Alignment of Tim, Brian, Alex, and Jay from marble hornets
Congrats he was arguably the most compelling in no way home
I hated the first Amazing movie with a passion to the point where I turned it off one-hour into it. Never saw the second film.
I saw NWH this weekend. Andrew Garfield is without a doubt one of the best parts of the entire movie. The dude's acting is above almost everybody else's with MAYBE the exception of Dafoe (and holy shit, somebody got the memo that Willem Dafoe is 1000x more terrifying with the mask off - I'm saying no more on that).
Garfield deserved better during his run. The writing and directing did him dirty. Now personally, I thought he would had been a better Harry than Peter; but at this point I just want to see the guy get some other major long-lasting role in a series somewhere that I have an interest in. Unfortunately my only experience with him right now is NWH, the first-half of Amazing Spider-Man, and... the Daleks in Manhattan two-parter from Doctor Who (and holy shit again, thank God his American accents have vastly improved since then... oof).
I say give TASM a second chance. I think if you calibrate your expectations around the idea this is a younger, more more morally grey Spider-Man that more actively struggles with “Great Power comes Great Responsibility.” rather than being shocked into it, I think you’ll like it far more.
Also, if you want more Andrew Garfield, go to Netflix and watch “tick, tick…BOOM!” unless you absolutely despise musicals, because otherwise it’s a masterful film. Garfield delivers an EVEN BETTER performance in that movie than in NWH, it’s crazy.
Ngl, I absolutely love the electro fight (even the itsy bitsy spider part)
On Peter forgetting to pick up Aunt May because he’s with dr Connors I’d give that chaotic good. He broke a promise to do a good thing for one person sure, but he broke it because he was helping do something good for potentially millions of people.
Andrew's version of Peter has always, unquestionably, been my favorite. I grew up watching Tobey, but in all honesty, I enjoyed the darker take on Spider-Man's story. Andrew also managed to perform obviously chaotic evil acts without being overly-cringey about it, like Tobey did in Spider-Raimi 3. And despite what people think, I believe Andrew plays a perfect *nerd* Peter. He just doesn't go over the top like Tobey's version did.
Hey, can someone explain to me how revenge is a Chaotic Evil aligned action? I would have put the "looking for a family member's killer for revenge as a Chaotic Neutral or even True Neutral act because it is a reasonable first reaction. Peter isn't doing it for some sadistic pleasure, but for closure and what he views as an act of justice.
Revenge doesn't care who gets hurt in the process. It's personal and often sadistic. More often that not, someone looking for revenge is willing to go to any lengths to achieve it. And in the end, it consumes the person seeking it with anger, causing them to lash out at, well, anyone and everyone. It does not listen to reason. It always ends in pain and death. Those who seek revenge often cause the pain or death of those they love, if not themselves, as the anger blinds them. It's questionable as to whether or not they'll even succeed in getting revenge, as well. And if they do, well, it's not a proper resolution being sought. It's death to satiate bloodlust. It's murder.
Revenge only hurts people, and the person it hurts the most is the one who seeks it.
He who seeks revenge digs two graves.
Very personal take on why:
If you admit revenge is _kind_ of a "right"... then you cannot talk down those you have wronged when they demand to have theirs, and any person who has ever do truly heinious acts is owe a punishment; and since it would be *really* hard to go through life without ever commiting actions which would require punishment under this "revenge is okay" policy... most people would agree revenge = bad.
Honestly I don’t vibe with it either. Sure, Peter isn’t seeking Ben’s killer for any noble reason, but it’s not like he has made any absolute commitment to murder the guy in cold blood, and he’s at least stopping some legitimate crime on the way. Peter at this point is an angry, grieving kid, not a committed killer.
@@ohwowitsthatguy9154 agreed. Peter might have broken the guys ribs, but he isn't a murderer. he would have done a little more than just tie him up with webs like the other guys he caught, but he would still just end up tying him up and throwing him away to the cops
@@spiceyicey I would say that, in fairness, at that point in the story Peter was on the knife’s edge on whether he would kill that guy, but by the end of the movie it’s pretty clear he wouldn’t, no matter how tempting. Because like most people, when Peter Parker is in a bad way, his friends and loved ones bring him back to a better version of himself.
I will say I do like that he sutured his gunshot wound with a web bandage which is actually a thing that ancient doctors used to do using spider webs too suture wounds because of spiderwebs natural antiseptic properties. In fact I wish more people would bring note to this in the comics, TV shows, and other movies.
All I can think of while watching this is the Spoilers Ahead video. Which just gives me belly laughs.
Andrew Garfield actually would be a decent collage aged Spider-Man where he’s less of a geeky loser and more confident.
Ah yes, Spider-Man snaps Gwen’s neck with the concrete floor
I do like the 3 live action Spider-Mans, for different reasons.
I feel Sam Rami's, is more of a nerd shy guy, I liked how Spider-Man's problems effect Peter Parker, and the difficulty finding a balance.
I like Garfield's Spider-Man because it's what I think a Teenager getting Superpowers, getting a little cocky, coming up with a good quip, and being a superpowered teen. Not to mention he built the web shooters.
I like Holland's Spider-Man, he finds a balance I like between the goofy teen nerd, and quick talking Spider-Man. His suit has emotive eyes.
Please do a D&D Character Alignment for the characters of Doom Patrol.
PLEASE
Yes please.
@@NoirRaven I’m talking about the DC series Doom Patrol on HBO Max.
I always thought Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man had potential. Yeah he is a bit of a dick at first but thought it can lead to great development. Where he starts to go off into the classic Spider-Man route after several endeavors and wrong moves that put him now on the right path.
Also felt like the most underrated moment was in 2 after Gwen’s death. Where flash approached Peter, Peter lashing out, and Flash saying he gets Peter’s feelings. IDK I felt like that could of been a start to friendship there. The once bully now wanting to help and say he gets the feeling. Might have lead to something later on but oh well.
Toby did straight up murder that guy in the original before they made flint the killer
true!
Having seen no way home, and being asked if Andrew Garfield is good but can't say spoilers, I have no comment, see y'all in 2 weeks when I do!
In my opinion amazing Spider-Man is the second best Spider-Man after no way home. Sure, in the beginning he's not likeable AND THAT'S THE POINT. Sure, he starts using his powers for personal gain and revenge but so did Tobey's spidey. The only difference is Andrew took longer to find the person who killed Ben. He doesn't become Spider-Man until the bridge scene where he finally realises what Ben meant.
But amazing Spider-Man 2 is the absolute worst movie ever. It had so much going in, it should of been split into 2 movies, it tried to answer questions no one was asking AND THE IDEA TO BASICALLY MAKE PETER 'THE CHOSEN ONE' SPITS IN THE FACE OF WHAT THE SPIDER-MAN IDENTITY STANDS FOR!!!
It's weird how for me, this are my least favorite Spider-Man's movies scripts, but at the same time, Andrew Garfield is my favorite actor and probably had the best performance over all. I just really wish he was casted for the Tobbey MacGuire films, and vice-versa.
I’m early and good job TheLoadingCrew
It is kinda stupid that the alignment system marks Revenge as automatically evil. Could use more nuance, but I suppose the nuance is up to the DM lol
Vengeance against actual evil, personal reasons or not should be chaotic good or chaotic neutral
Because revenge is evil. Hurt for the sake of hurt accomplishes nothing but catharsis for the individual.
Without too many spoilers, Garfield needs to be in the Venomverse It just makes too much sense and would give his Spiderman an amazing arch
And now we wait for the alignments and analysis of NWH
Spoilers for no way home but I think Andrew might have one of the best scenes in the movie
perfect!!
Andrew was actually my favorite spider man.
this version of Uncle Ben's death is probably my favourite. Nat 20.
If you think this version of the lizard was odd you should see what the animated series spiderman was doing with him.
20:09 haha wouldnt that be crazy
20:16 lol
I like Garfield as Spider-Man. Hes energetic, snarky, and always has a quip ready. As Peter though, Garfield i think lacked at playing as Peter.
This right here, playing Spider-Man is a balancing act between Peter Parker and the hero. If you lack in one area it detracts from the other in my opinion. I also don't like darker Renditions of characters.
I’ll be honest- I adore Toby’s Peter. He’s so good at playing the type of nerdy guy that Pete is supposed to be. I do think Andrew is a great Spidey, making more quips than any spidey out there. I just think he’s way too ‘cool’ for being Peter. Tom does a really good job of combining the elements of his predecessors.
Um..... Did you read any of the og stan lee Spiderman comics ? Becouse peter is nothing like toby's Spiderman and more like andrew's Spiderman
This is a great video explaining it
ua-cam.com/video/ANj5GvXTuJU/v-deo.html
@@Drippy_Venom Are you referring to his early comics? Because that isn’t Spider-Man. That will have been when they were still figuring out his character. I mean, in his early comics, Batman used guns
@@Drippy_Venom Peter Parker has evolved past og Stan's run and while I will give credit to Andrew's version of Spider-Man for adapting that of SM most people have grown to love Peter Parker and Spider-Man after Stan's original run.
Admittingly I haven’t read most of the comics. But I’ve watched many of the movies and cartoons Spidey is in. I’m sure that my own bias is coming into play here, but that’s just my interpretation of each of the live action incarnations of Spidey/Pete.
18:16 More of a "head smashed against concrete" than "snaps neck" but sure.
I would love for you do Hajime from Arifureta with it's second season starting in January
One thing I can say about Andrew spiderman that is very comics accurate is that his life is fucking miserable. Spiderman is all about Peter Parker facing constant adversity and still coming out on top, no matter how hard it is
If I was Peter I wouldn’t stop the robber. Dude had a gun and the cashier was a asshole. That’s neutral to me
Still need to watch Amazing 2... It's probably not a "Good" movie by conventional standings, but if Garfield's in NWH (No spoilers from anyone please) Then I still need to watch it... And the Venom Duology... fuck, that's three movies before I can go see the newest Spider-Man movie!
I’m planning to watch NWH tomorrow
Could you do an alignment video on Cayde-6 from the games and comics?
Spoiler free review of No Way Home:
It was a perfect film.
In terms of what was promised, what was delivered, and how it was executed:
It absolutely nailed it. It is EXACTLY what you hope for when you see a crosover.
Re: "X" being the best character in NWH...
From this Amazing fan, the answer is unequivocally, "YES!"
all the good scenes for TASM were pretty much cut out and left as deleted scenes. I highly recommend looking them up
I think Tobey was a better Parker than he was spidey, and Garfield was a better spidey. But Tom Holland is the total package.
Also Curt Conners is neutral good. While Conners does have a personal stake in repairing people's bodies, that does not detract from the noble intent of his research. Lizard's entire plan is to force a mutation on the entirety of society, which is lawful evil.
Just watched No Way Home! Spectacular movie!
Just saw the most recent movie. It was VERY good. Highly recommend.
Andrew was for sure the best character in the movie!
Thank you! I'm going to watch Spider-Man No Way Home today, but I hadn't seen Andrew Garfield version. This was a godsend.
HAHAHAH!! perfect!
Andrew is the best. No disrespect to the others, but I felt a bigger connection with Andrew’s spider man than I’ve done with the other two.
Isn't taking away someone's free will considered evil? I feel like transforming the human population into lizard people without their consent is evil. Lawful Good for Connors, neutral or chaotic evil for the Lizard
Do a video on Hellsing Ultimate
you ever heard of a book series called, "the black prism"
it seems like the kind of thing you would be into it.
Those books are great man
My opinion is that Andrew Garfield was very good, but he was put into badly written movies and a gritty Spider-Man which... just... no. *Spoilers, at least my opinion about AG* Is he the best character in No Way Home? No, but he is damn good. Gave the character an arc it desperately needed, he now feels complete.
He is in the top 5 best character in no way home, maybe top 3..... yeaaaaahhh
Andrew Garfield is my favourite Spider-man!
I can confirm andrew garfeild was the best part of no way home
Lol I have great news for you about Andrew in NWH
funny enough he is
What did Stuart mean when he said that Spiderman tried to make his webbing grounded?
@@domine2693 Thank you
While I can't say in all honesty that Andrew Peter is the best character in no way home he is much improved
in no way home... Andrew is (drum roll please!!)… the best, his arc got completed by the movie and they treated him with respect instead of making jokes at his expense, if you see this comment I will take a pin for this information.
I got disagree that belongs to Toby and Tom in my opinion. I just love when a older wiser Spider-Man gets to act as an older brother to a younger Spider-Man. Toby is the perfect Peter and Spider-Man as he honestly found a balance between Peter and Spider-Man that Andrew completely misses in his first movies and Tom is still trying to find which makes sense with him as Tom is still a kid who had support for a decent amount of time as is run as Spider-Man but he's now back to square one all alone with no one in his corner now.
@@zachbahamutson5477 I meant best arc, I prefer Tom Holland actually, as I feel the things that were complained about were fixed, and he just did things I felt were amazing for his character, Tom Holland however, is only just starting his arc, as I feel that he made a choice, but we haven't seen him burden the full weight of his actions, not yet, he might have a good start for an arc, but is only preparing to start. Hope I explained my opinion better for this! ALSO DAMN I was a snot nosed prick a year ago.
@@aclaymushroomwithaberet7084 okay I can agree with you on that. He had one of the best character arcs, and Tom has the potential to have one of the best but that's if they don't mess him up. Anyways sight tension did you know that originally in the Rammi films Peter was going to make mechanical web shooters to help with his organic ones as apparently they would be more globby when they came out.
@@zachbahamutson5477 huh, you know wh6y they changed it?
@@aclaymushroomwithaberet7084 no clue but someone in the background probably said that having both organic and mechanical web shooters was stupid and it probably snowballed from there. I say it would have been ingenious allowing Peter to have all the positives of organic webbing, including organic webbing being safe to use as bandages on open wounds, and the positives of mechanical web shooters such as being able to coat your web in some sort of conductive gel.
Please do Madara Uchiha
Have you done Alucard from Hellsing Ultimate?
Garfield was a great Spider-Man; he was way too "cool" as Peter, though.
In my opinion, Andrew is a better Spiderman than Toby, but he is a worse Peter Parker.
Andrew is the best character in the movie
🔥🔥🔥
8:07 good one 😆😆😆
So like I know its entirely your video and my response is not ment to criticize you but rather bring up an interesting conversation.
I feel as though a goof few of blpeters beginning actions that had been marked as evil could have been seen more as neutrals as they provoked by an event that would make him good and are only seen as evil due to slight enjoyment being felt. I mean just because someone enjoys the crack of someone else's face doesn't make them evil when they only target those who deserve it. Like in that scene with him toying with one of the men he believed to be who he was looking for when the cop arrived I'd say the way he was speaking was more akin to an impulsive kid still in grief. Him chastising the cop for his job sounds more like someone who has control of the situation but has yet to realize what that's suppose to feel like. Almost like a child who won an argument with there parent that they never imagined they'd win. Not knowing what to say next they stammer and speak on topics a little more outside of there control if that makes sense.
Thoughts? anyone else?
as far as I see it, Tobey makes the best Peter parker, since he is a awkward geek, while Andrew Garfield makes the best Spider-man, since he is a bit of a smack-talking, sassy trickster. That is what I have always loved about spider-man, ever since I was a child. He is an everyday nerd, but once he dons the suit, he becomes sassy, confident and talk smack back to pretty much anyone. I have unfortunately no opinion on the Tom Holland spider-man, since I dropped off the MCU train before rise of ultron (with the exceptions being venom and spider-man: into the spider-verse, but I don't think that those are part of the MCU). Just lost interest....
.......that unfortunately means that I have not seen all of your MCU videos...sorry about that.
Wow age of ultron? You didn't even watch one by accident? Not judging by the way, most people seem to dip out after endgame. Which dang, you missed end game?
@@RetroIsaac all true. the only exceptions were venom and into the spider-verse
@@TheGamingEngi Man...well if you want any recommendations, Thor Ragnorok and Gaurdians 1 and 2 were great. You'll probably like them.
YEEEEEESS GOBLIN SLAYER
I heard he slays goblins
Garfield is the best Spider-man in no way home. Just my opinion.
DR COX LOVED SPIDER MEN
Ahem. He was the best character in the movie. Well, one of the best anyway.
top three spiderman. that's for sure
Garfield is the best in NWH
evil gang
I think Andrew's tried too hard to be serious, and it hurts the films in my opinion. They aren't terrible, and neither is his performance, but I do not like that he abandoned the promise to Captain Stacey to keep his daughter safe, which he made while the man was dying. Promises like that, especially to a character like Spider-man, are important.
20:09 Spoiler!
Funnily enough, he was one of the best
Why? Why such a dark set spider man? This makes me feel good not watching those two movies now.
Skateboarding is way too cool for Peter. He's the mega nerd, he doesn't do anything cool.
I do agree but this Peter feels for close to the dickish Peter of the o.g. comics. I do think Andrew was a good spiderman, just this movies themselves arnt good
My dad described the problem with these movies perfectly when they came out
They have an amazing spiderman, but an AWFUL peter parker
The Amazing Spider-Man was one ding away from being Chaotic Evil. No wonder people hate this iteration.
:)