Reacting To Vaush's Genocide Debate w/ Sitch & Adam, DoomerPolitics
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2022
- Destiny joins Sitch & Adam, DoomerPolitics as they review Vaush's controversial genocide debate...
Date: 5 Jun, 2022
Follow Destiny
►STREAM - www.destiny.gg/bigscreen
►DISCORD - discordapp.com/invite/destiny
►REDDIT - / destiny
►INSTAGRAM - / destiny
►MERCH - shop.destiny.gg/
Sitch & Adam Show
► / psasitchdaily
Check Out My Amazon: www.amazon.com/shop/destiny
Buy My Merch: shop.destiny.gg/
#Destiny
GENOCIDE IS IMMINENT, BUY GUNS, SHOOT THEM - Vaush Masks Off In Insane Debate ►ua-cam.com/video/LUSv32HtHJ4/v-deo.html
DID DESTINY SEND YOU? - Vaush SHUTS DOWN Mid Debate, Accuses Rose Of Being Bad Faith ►ua-cam.com/video/kg_n2CMCR_M/v-deo.html
Why don't you make the music in the intro even louder next time? I was still able to hear Destiny speak.
TIMESTAMPS PLOX
Mr. August sir please we are thirsting so hard for timestamps, if there are no chapters it still would be a huge improvement
This is very obsessive
August timestamps plss!!!
I love that Destiny doesn’t just join the others in wildly dog pilling on Vaush. He was forced to defend Vaush when it came to honest good faith discourse. Props to you Mr Destiny 😎
Even though they were saying things that destiny says and some of which they literally got from destiny, he’s just being contrarian because he can’t handle anyone agreeing for too long
@@shockwavesyndrome6433 If you think he is just being contrarian, you are so lost.
yeah, this was supposed to be the utmost example of sprite driven content but he did steelman qquite a few of vaush's arguments
It just does how brain lit they are. It took them 30 min, and they still really don't get it, that there a difference between caring as a motivation and caring as a means of acceptance.
@@RanEncounter maybe he’s an insane person who forgot that he originated the arguments they were making about vaush
Destiny’s chat was so negative about sitch and Adam even though they agreed on 90% of the points during the show and overall agree on 70-80% of their political views. People calling them reactionaries is so dumb. They literally just try to not straw man conservatives (even though I think Adam is too generous to them a lot).
Centrists may be the most hated group in all the spectrum. It's hilarious.
I try to avoid using the word "reactionary" now. It's soooo overused.
@@Corvid- I think a lot of that has to do with how many people hide behind calling themselves cEnTrIsT. It gets tiring talking to "centrists" espousing patently biased viewpoints and worldviews who try to avoid criticism by pretending to be moderate.
@@rollingr0ck centrism doesnt mean you dont hold bias tho, its mostly "let me actually take a look at this topic and form a view thats devoid of the groupthink of any particular side" basically why centrists lean left or right.
Probably had something to do with how ultra charitable they were to Trump, and how they got defensive when Destiny pointed out the right does the same shit they mock the left for. I wouldn’t call them reactionary, but these two clearly have a blind spot when it comes to the right.
Thanks a lot for going onto sitch and adam! Really enjoyed having you as a guest there!
For all the people upset that this is only 4 hours long, the full 11 hour and 55 minute podcast is available on Sitch & Adam’s channel.
Adam and Sitch's channel
@@stevetoth7136 Adam and stitch*
@@shockwavesyndrome6433 *Lilo and Stitch
There was also an additional 30 minutes that was cut off 😂
destiny talked about vaush more in a day then vaush tanked about him in a month
I enjoy listening to Sitch and Adam once in a while, I think they lay down the centrist positions pretty well and are overall chill dudes.
Edit; to people dismissing my ,,centrist" label I feel the need to point out that America (socially) is very left-leaning. Sure, Adam may be a light-flavor of a conservative in California, but his opinion on abortion, the lgbt community, religion etc are very liberal in countries east of Germany. I think my label is 100% justified, if we judge their views from the prism of world-politics.
Sitch is fine. Adam genuinely is like a 13 IQ knuckle dragger. I've never once heard him share a unique thought that wasn't the dumbest shit you've ever heard in your entire life.
@@Shadowh8ter iT’S tHe NEo MaRXiSts
@@Shadowh8ter Ngl Adam seems low IQ most of the time but he does have his moments
I thought the same until Adam started talking about what he believes like the call between trump and brad raffenspurger was just talking about election number and denying the pressure trump was putting on raffenspurger.
@@error_3498 I have such a vivid memory of him arguing about how kids as young as like 12 should be able to vote on politics, and the conversation somehow flowed to "If a child came up to you and was like hey I'm from the future, you shouldn't do this thing because it'd cause problems for you would you listen to him?" and Adam was like "Well yeah if the kids makin sense then why not".
The echo discourse was the best content destiny has had in months.
It's hard to argue with this take
The part where everybody goes "hmmmmmm" in unison was downright spiritual.
They were trying to find the echo amongst them
Destiny still has not made a commentary on the economy, inflation, and gas prices
@@exiledhebrew1994 well it’s not like those are the most important political topics to most Americans right now.
I can’t wait for the CRT debate with Sitch and Adam.
Whatever side of the debate you fall on, this would be an epic watch
@@matthewdougherty8814 How often does Destiny even talk about CRT? I feel like the debate wouldn't be that entertaining because Destiny isn't that passionate about it
@@comeatmebro8120 true, I think he is very talented and given time to prepare he could put up a good fight against sitch who is well read on the topic. I think he and sitch would be an interesting match based on how they both value accurate reading of sources and not just picking quotes.
Snore
Wasn't Destiny against it because of some cringe things he read about it?
A Rags and Destiny crossover. This is a strange reality but I can accept it.
They already had a crossover though.
@@tjs1212 when was that?
@@matthewpeterson2317 EFAP 188, Destiny went on to talk about EEAAO
@@tjs1212 Hey, the more the merrier :)
Does rags do anything content wise or?
>Sitch & Adam
>edited video is 4.5 hours long
yeah sounds about right
Lol the total stream was over 12 hours long
Too short
Can’t wait for you to complete a 12 hour stream with Sitch and Adam
*Adam and sitch
@@Witchunter0090 S class best class.
@@Witchunter0090 SSSSSsSSSSsSSSS
@@crazykubla ksssskskssskskss
@@Witchunter0090 *sitch and adam
S 👏 CLASS 👏 IS 👏 THE 👏 BEST 👏 CLASS 👏
A Team pities the foo
D-CLUB, DUDE
*soundboard* : CORRECT!
Hope Adam sees that Destiny made it "Sitch and Adam" in the title
Doesn't August choose the titles for the videos?
@@proudtobeme1ashkente Pretty sure, I feel like when he was talking with Lauren, and when she brought up the comments on destiny's videos, even destiny was surprised by the title of the video, or maybe the thumbnail, I can't remember
August confirmed S class
im not even watching this video, im watching the entire Adam and Sitch livestream... yes, it takes me a couple of days
TRUE
Adam and Sitch? Don’t you mean Sitch and Adam?
@@thegwangster9097 destiny titled the stream "on adam and sitch" this proves that adam and sitch is the SUPERIOR name.
God bless your brain cells.
These are great. It lasts days & reduces the craving for shorter videos
Hard agree, I would argue they are even more enjoyable
Finally, I was waiting for this crossover.
"dehumanizing people used to be so uncommon"
History called, it wants you to know about the red scare
And history in general
@@WeaponizedAutismiii true, but usually idiots like the dude who said that (Adam?) Like to pretend 1950s America was some uniquely humane and civil place when it was anything but if you know history
And the Red Terror.
The Red Scare was right to a large degree. The Soviets played the long game by infiltrating Universities and colleges though on top of funding Hollywood, Unions, and social causes they thought would cause as much violence or problems as possible. That's how we got here really. China picking up where they left off didn't help.
@@johnnyboy2537 We were literally having teaching pledge their allegiance or get deported, it was absolutely far overboard lmao
it was awesome seeing Destiny on Sitch and Adam! Hopefully he goes on more!
4 hours of Vaush circlejerk let's freaking go!
Can already tell this is going to be a banger vod.
I see this is chat's first time with sitch and Adam
This guys faith in Kelly Ann Conway is wild to me
The #Vaush problem is as follows... Vaush can now never afford to be rational otherwise the fan-base he's amassed will literally kill him. XD
HELL yeah a cool unbiased vaush coverage with doomer and sitch wooo
🤣sure
4 hours this is gonna be a great video to rot my brain to
every "panel" with doomerpolitics has a dude that has the exact same voice as him
I laughed at someone's theory that they are an alter ego of demonmama.
Not sure what I find more entertaining: this reaction crossover I've long awaited for or live chat coping with EFAP style reaction.
I'm legit surprised, all day I've only read one comment here about them pausing a ton. I thought the Pauses were going to be a theme in this comment section for sure.
I don't have enough brain cells to sacrifice for a 4 hour Vaush content dump, but God damn it I can't resist
I don't like any of you. Well Destiny is a bright guy and he beat up the fraud David Pakman. Just didn't let that punk get away with his usual b.s.
I think all the Bernie supporters are not only fools to believe Bernie works for you, complete morons. You keep getting pissed when he sells out, but after a few months Kyle's, cenk, David's got you backing the geezer. Nothing but talk. 45 plus yrs of talk.
I finished off a bottle of Smirnoff to this. Helps the medicine go down, so to speak.
Now you can ensure those brain cells never come back
When you have zero brain cells you have nothing to lose.
@@cultreader9751 how's that going so far?;
I like the longer format I'm a truck driver prefer these. appreciate you
Check sitch and adam they have 6-12 hour streams every Sunday.
Thank you for your service
@@beardedraven7285 agreed. I stick them on and listen as I commute to and from work. Destiny + sitcb and Adam roughly covers my chilled commute time for the week.
I just can't decide whether Vaush actually believes what he's saying, if he's just exaggerating what he thinks is the truth, or if he's just grifting at this point.
On one hand, he said in the past lying to better the cause should be done. And the other he has been in politics long enough to maybe see how Americans hate socialist. Both hands he is lying for his betterment.
@@ocin129ocin129 man I didn’t think about how untrustworthy he really is. I didn’t like him before but I truly don’t understand how he has a fan base at all, HE WILL LIE TO YOU FOR HIS POLITICAL GAIN
His views are so inconsistent and extreme that if it was discovered/revealed that he was just a right-wing troll it wouldn't shock me at all. Unfortunately I don't see that being true, so he's more likely just an extremist grifter.
@@ericfisher4736 what about him seems right wing??
@@tomasroque3338 I was saying that it wouldn't shock me to find out he was a right-winger that is taking an exaggerated leftist position in an attempt to troll the left. It would be similar to what Steven Colbert did when he had The Colbert Report, just with opposite parties. Nothing about him would seem right-wing because (in this scenario I made up) he's playing a left-wing character.
I really like Adam and Sitch (the objectively correct order), but Adam can be really dumb sometimes. I hate when he gets passive aggressive, like when him and Destiny were arguing, and he said something along the lines of "maybe you'll actually listen to the call". He gets really triggered and it makes it impossible for anyone to really engage with him
It's ok if Sitch is there to calm him down tho
@@error_3498 Yeah, it's entertaining and Sitch usually just laughs to clear the air, or trolls him a little until Adam starts laughing and chills a bit. I like Adam a lot, he just shouldn't take disagreements so personally
@@Terrbearr428 yea Adam can get super triggered especially if he thinks the outher person is lying
If only he could keep his cool like Sitch
I like them too, but Adam's elephant not only controls him it's mating season for it.
I honestly think he's just trying to bait destiny into a debate later.
>tfw i was namedropped in this convo multiple times
all of my takes are good
you should have gone on, Dev
@@ZauTa not my show man, and too many cooks
@@ShortFatOtaku I'd actually love to see a conversation between you and Destiny (girl's name). Dunno how that would happen or what it would be about but it sounds fun.
Random aside Dev but now that Elon Musk has been shown beyond a shadow of a doubt to be a CCP shill, are you going to make a video about how people were right to hate him, they just picked all the wrong reasons?
@@bigbrainenergyguy he already did one. It was pretty fucking embarrassing.
Steven it's time for your daily dose of vaush drama
When most people say "let's not make this political" or "don't make this about politics." What they're really trying to say is "just agree with me because I'm right and don't argue with me about it."
Someone was arguing with me the other day about how "Jordan Peterson is philosophical, not political. In fact he argues for LESS politics, which is good!"
And I was like ?? Less politics what does that even mean lmao
The Fortress is slowly becoming the Donner Party...
Starving? Who's starving? There's fresh meat everywhere!
Didn't expect this this to be so entertaining damn!
Check out the sunday stream this week then.
damn when Adam said that Honesty in media thing a chatter said "Honesty in media is the new ethics in videogame journalism" and that's so fucking TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Adam & Sitch just sounds better tho.
Anyways more Destiny/A&S content.
Sitch and Adam sounds faster
Clearly an A-team shitpost S-class = best class
my public high school's sex ed also taught shadow partners. That is a way more common idea than people like to think
Eh, if you're trying to illustrate how STDs spread it CAN be valid, but it does get used in a lot of weird ways.
@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor STDs are not that big of a deal. Most of the common ones have treatments or vaccines and they aren’t typically life ruining. Not every STD is HIV and even people with HIV now have comparable life spans to the average population. Be safe, use protection if you’re having casual sex and hooking up, get yourself and your partners tested, normalize getting regularly tested, but there’s no need for the fearmongering. Just teach people safe sex habits.
@@Adam-tu1lk I don't see what that has to do with teaching people about how they spread.
@@Adam-tu1lk plus I don't think _you_ get to decide how big of a deal it is if I get a disease.
@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor I don't but most ppl think they're like these permanent black marks upon your health. They are not and we should teach people about the risks, symptoms, how to get tested, and treatment options instead of trying to them away from having sex.
Couldn’t take them seriously after they disagreed that men are praised for high body counts and women aren’t… that’s just objectively true and they need to disagree
"Should type 1 diabetics be allowed to live"
"No" 🗿
Crazy chemistry here please do more of this🙏
As far as the sex ed in school. We did a thing here where most of the class had cups of water, a couple ppl had like vinegar or something. You would mix two cups together then separate them out. That was "having sex". You would do this 3 times. Then they'd put an indicator in and if it changed pink that meant you got an STD. Everyone always had an STD.
Not the most stupid way of presenting STDs and how they propagate but I still think sex Ed has A LOT more to teach than protection, stds and how a human gets into existence. It's unfortunate that the psychological part is always left out and people get to learn the consequences much later in their life.
Is the lack of timestamps a way to force more watchtime?
who the fuck is doing timestamps for a 4 and a half hour video where there's a pause every 5 seconds to address a new topic
@@JPEGBLACK Someone who's getting paid like 20k a month to run this channel. Stop being a simp.
@@JPEGBLACK The dude who gets paid to edit, upload and add timestamps. That's who
@@JPEGBLACK it shouldnt be 4 and a half hours in the first place. the whole point of this channel is to pare down content for people who don't watch the stream, not upload half of the entire vod.
Excuse me, the VOD is over 11 hours so this is barely more than 1/3 of it
Yooo let's go i never thought I'd see a Sitch and Destiny collab.
25:00 vaush said gop wouldn't care if that happen not that they were going to do it there.
Yes. The completely miss the point.
It's not they WILL round up the gays, it's that they don't care if that outcome happens on the backs of their initial policy.
Poor rags not getting included in the title
I grew up in a conservative Christian environment and there was plenty of pressure on guys to not have sex before marriage, it was in no way all pinned on girls. Even with a boy contributing to a pregnancy, a conservative Christian parent would expect you as the father to take care of that child. So the fear of a pregnancy is a disincentive for premarital sex for guys in a conservative Christian environment.
No shot are you gonna honestly claim that that pressure and shame was equally distributed
Destiny vs Sitch and Adam on CRT debate when? My fav YTbers digging into eachother sounds uber fun.
Couldn’t edit out the annoying stuff at the beginning with them fiddling with settings?
I love when Adam and sitch have videos with or about destiny. They ended up leading me to his content. all around good people to watch
uch, i don't like adam that much
@Carl Mencia still better than Rags
@@cultreader9751 Rags has grown on me a bit but yeah I agree sometimes he can come off as a bit condescending
@@comeatmebro8120 That’s kinda his shtick tho
Sitch and Adam*
We were just talking about the lock and key analogy in one of my classes today and it comes up in this video (I’ve seen this video before, but am rewatching it)
Hey Mr or Ms editor, just a heads up the intro music is way too loud for anyone not using headphones! You catch like every 5th word someone says.
I highly suggest to ALL editors after you are done editing a video (which 99.9% of us do with headphones only) that you give the video a quick listen through your speakers as well to see how the audio mixing sounds on speakers as well. Because a large chunk of viewers will be listening through speakers.
four hours of Vaush arc content, sign me in
4 hours not working on the manifesto
"Watch the video while working on the manifesto, you little bitch." - A Starling
1:22:15 Adam and Sitch, Lilo and Stitch. It just works.
I've been waiting for this
Destiny on the Sitch & Adam Show is based, I have to watch this.
Childhood is a magical time period. Disillusion is inevitable. Might as well make some fun memories with theater like Christmas.
No fun just hard facts because that’s what makes a totally not psycho kid
I’m still conflicted on this. What if your 6 year old child comes to you and says “dad, Bobby said Santa Claus is not real. Is that true?”. I think I would have a hard time blatantly lying to my kid
@@alexd4566 Why not? teach them the importance of socially shared myths early. If they accept everything is made up and is a lie they'll go down some gay nihilist path.
@@sameash3153 Why would they go with a gray nihilist path? Seems like a very black and white take from you. No way I would ever lie straight up to my kid even for "Santa". You can easily talk and teach about socially shared myths and still say the truth.
@@RanEncounter Because it's funnier that way. And my post did imply telling the truth, it just stressed that you should play along while still acknowledging the truth and not just taking a "yeah we lied to you, sorry" approach.
''Vaush, Vaush, Vaush.'' - Destiny, probably.
SPRITE DRIVEN
"VOWSH." - Destiny, definitely.
Wait... "I would argue that all of cultural evolution is meant to serve biological evolution" what the fuck? Insane
It's not a genocide if they do it south of the border there it's called a
genocidio
RIGHT IN MY FEEEEED
RIGHT IN MY SNEEEEED
@@joki2371 Chuckpilled.
im so tired of reading the name "vaush" i just wanna enjoy sane conversations with sane people
Watch more academic debates
Agreed
I like it when they yell at each other.
no you dont
@@nipnop4954 This exactly. All these UA-camr 'debates' are really just pop debates that are mostly entertainment with little educational substance cuz most UA-camrs are idiots who think they're smarter and more knowledgeable than they actually are. Debates involving experts in their fields are actually where the real educational content is at. Intelligence Squared Debates do a decent job with covering a broad range of topics and involving an organized, semi-formal format. And even these debates are Step 1 of 1,000; most learning about a topic can only be done through reading.
How many streamers does it take to figure out audio issues
huh, these guys really don't think that religious people see men who have premarital sex as being inherently less bad than women who have premarital sex? Maybe it will be better explained this way: the act of premarital sex is seen as inherently bad and definitely frowned upon. But if you are a woman/girl who is no longer a virgin you are seen as forever tarnished by that fact. You have taken something from your future husband, and in extreme cases are seen as no longer marriageable. But if you are a man who has premarital sex then you are definitely told that you are sinning and should stop, but if you do stop, people will probably just say that you had a "wild phase" before you found the right girl and that's kinda the end of it.
For a Republican Adam seems to be weirdly unaware of pretty well-known Republican beliefs and actions.
when did adam call himself a republican
8:30 to skip the tech issues that SOMEONE should've edited out *cough* August *cough*
That was entertaining though.
Nah it was good banter
That gave me some jay flashbacks
Four and a half hours, HOLY SHIT!
Legendary collab, but wish there was less ads
Premium is worth bro
less aids lol
i really hope to see more of all these guys, also is that the same rags who was a conservtive anti sjw furry dude from the old days?
Yeap
“Furry”
@@yanhuideng8263 He is actually a furry, he confirmed it on Efap.
Adams audio seems deeper and more bass heavy on his own stream. Pretty sus Adam!
Any way to make the music in the intro louder?
I don't trust the media, but I will believe everything in Kelly Ann's book.
I was so confused why he kept citing her book like it was evidence of what did or didnt happen in Trumps admin
@@MrWane1 ya shes batshit insane. that’s like citing the MyPillow guy or Alex Jones
Because having literal TDS to the point where you repeat shit said on MSNBC is totally in line with reality lmao
I haven’t read her book but since her book is a tell all published after her time at the White House (i.e she has less to lose) the assumption is that her words are more truthful. Idk if they are but that’s the implicit assumption made.
Same can be said about destiny. he watched them lie about Kyle Rittenhouse over and over again, but he called trump fascist for saying they are the enemy of the people. yea I think they are the enemy of the people if they continue to lie to the people. Which ultimately has helped perpetuate violence against the American people.
I am 50 minutes in and I disagree with a lot of what everyone is saying in this video. However, it seems to be a good discussion and dissection overall, good video.
what did you disagree with?
based
I mean the summary of this video is vaush is crazy and the majority of those in the right, conservatives not even the most right of ppl, is not trying to kill the lbgtq
I didnt expect Adam and sitch to have so much in common with the EFAP podcast
I found Adam And Sitch and EFAP at the same time because Sitch was on the episode I was watching that UA-cam showed me. so they've always been connected for me.
Don't like EFAP (i have a life) but I love Mauler
@@AKABattousai yeah they seem to be similar in some ways :P
@@crazymonk27 one of the running jokes in their back and forths was the episode count on EFAP and the sitch and Adam show.
There isn't a huge overlap because one is politically focused and the other is media focused. But they do colab sometimes like the Hasan drama and jay exci with the chair streams from Hasan.
@@AKABattousai I was thinking more about how they both go on and on reacting to videos while pausing them for so long that you start to feel bored like a kid in the backseat during a cross country road trip with nothing to do.
Lol RIP to Rags not being in the video title.
What? No 12 hour version?
Get your celery sticks and orange soda. This is gonna be a good watch, gamers 😎
i got regular sodie pop :D
My drink is green and my snack is orange.
*brushes Dorito dust off fingers*
Is it bad that I hope your comment is an Oneyplays reference?
@@cultreader9751 it is my friend ;)
LETS GAME
The intro music was WAY too loud!
the music hurt my ears🧓👵👵👵👵
@@fawaz2771 nah, I literally just couldn't hear what Destiny was saying over the music lmao
"The audio could have been mixed better in the intro" might have been better I guess
Editor bro, what is game
Why don't you also mention Rags in the title?
Wasn't expecting for you to join Stitch and Adam's show. Cool
they are one of the best "perceived right" political commentators that actually don't have a circlejerk of yes men. i sometimes watch tim pool and he has some decent theoretical takes sometimes, but it just feels so fake seeing them agree with and play off each other in such a fake and self-masturbatory way. crowder and sargon/lotus are even worse
the only thing that id say that might be bad about adam & sitch is that they act very humorous. but at least it makes otherwise stressful topics more digestible and entertaining
@@wtrflsh it’s called sitch and Adam comedy show, they like their politics and try to dunk on each other and argue all the time but you know they’re really close, it’s always a pretty cozy stream.
@@2xRainb0w i mean i agree. the humorous part is most likely intended for a reason. it definitely is more chill than the constant panic narrative on other channels.
but fact is that adding humor can weaken the political power your statements and arguments have because its "too casual". From how i see it, there aren't a lot of good political commentators, otherwise destiny might've never turned into one - so its not too crazy for people to be starved for a "savior".
Back in my catholic school sex ed was about how contraceptives are not actually that good and that abstinence was the best lol
Religious education should be abolished tbh.
I mean.... Do you think people should be allowed to pick what school their kids go to _at all?_
@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor I don't care, this 'tarded free market idea of "competition" and "choice" should have never mixed with education at all. I'd like for the only school a parent should be able to pick for their kids be the one that's closest to them, since ideally ALL schools should be good.
@@diegoseba12 That's very authoritarian of you.
True. Religious and private schools are dogsh"t and should be abolished. Force wealthy people and christian dipsh"ts to actually fund and care about public schools.
Catholics are Catholics. Christians who are not Catholic don’t receive a Catholic education. Catholics have a belief about contraception. That doesn’t mean all other religious people share their viewpoint.
The Hobby Lobby case was specifically about birth control, not plan B
Damn I saw a 4hr 30min video from Destiny and thought it was his manifesto…
This is just way too long for me to watch without timestamps.
Moderates always have the chillest discussions.
Moderate is a relative and simplistic term, no one agree's what it means.
Moderate in what regard? I consider destiny to be atleast very lefty in America
Moderates have no backbone, they stand for nothing and will bend in front of any dictatorship and collaborate to eradicate a resistance to such dictatorship
Holy shit is that Rags??? The guy that roasts Jaystation??
I may disagree with Destiny's opinions like 99% of the time, but I absolutely detest the dishonesty of Vaush*
What game is this? looks fun
EDIT: Found it, it's "V rising"
Thx for the edit mate
I’ve gone from binging old Hitchens CSPAN interviews to binging Sitch and Adam.
It’s been interesting to watch real long form intellectual debates transfer from the tube to the UA-cam.
Nice, now I have something to get me thru 1/3 of my shift tomorrow
Thanks for helping me survive a 5 hour train ride and the walk home though listening to this I really didnt want to.
This was one of the most interesting conversations I've listened to in a while; usually I can't sit through multiple hours of something like this, but even the disagreements were more substantive and engaging than usual. We came dangerously close to a triple digit IQ convo in a few places, careful lads!
Until the moment that Adam guy talked, sure!
Then it was literally NoBullshit tier, lol
It can never get to even 50 IQ range because Vaush is in the call
@@asimplewizard the Adam hate is unreal he agrees with destiny 90% of the time
and then he says you could actually see the trump phone call from a different point of view
Suddenly he's some low IQ buffoon
@@asimplewizard Adam is normally fine but good god, when he goes off the deep end he full sends it.
@@unclegruber5703 Idk man, I've been watching this community since prefap when they all just made independent videos.
I've always thought Adam was particularly annoying to listen to.
Rags rides the line for me, but I respect he's got a thought process behind his views and is open to views from all sides.
Great collab! Adam and sitch have their own biases but seem to always have some good honest discourse and balance each other well, you were a great addition destiny!
Guys what's the instrument that the editors uses in the beginning of the video I been looking for it for a while help me guys
The new intro card is KINO
Uhh.. So, I'm around the same age as Destiny. My public school (Fort Worth, Texas) taught nearly the exact same things he talked about (shadow partners, grotesque images of genitalia, how having multiple partners ruins your ability to have intimate relationships moving forward - they used a bruised apple to explain it).
I don't think think the dogshit explanations of sex are only isolated to Catholic schools.
How many years ago was that though?I'm younger than destiny and my sex ed in Houston wasn't anything like he described. We watched a video explaining the biological process, stds (some of the common ones, how they are spread & how to avoid catching them), and contraception. We were advised the only surefire way to avoid pregnancy and stds was abstinence (which is true), but they didn't tell us that is what we should do. Never heard of this shadow partner or bruised apple thing. That's wild that you got that in a public school.
Same and I went to public school in New Jersey
@@barneystinson2781 So thinking back on it. I had two sex-ed talks.
The first one was in PE (general population of students) and we were were split-up by sexes for that day. It was probably fifth grade - so 1998? All students got this one (in comparison to the 2nd one which I'll discuss below).
This was the one that said abstinence-only, bruised apples, shadow partners, and didn't at all talk about contraceptives. Some of it was a video, which was the STD portion (i.e. grotesque images with no discussion whatsoever about the treatment of STDs, which led me to believe STDs were permanent), and showed the male anatomy. The female It did not talk *at all* about the female anatomy, or how sex was performed (which.. caused one of my friends to have sex incorrectly/anal).
I then had one more sex-ed class 2-3 years later. However, ONLY the honors students had access to it. We were told not to tell our parents about it. However, we were told that we could leave if we thought our parents would be against it, or if we weren't comfortable.
It was performed by planned parenthood, and it was supposedly the last year that planned parenthood was going to be allowed into the schools.
It was super useful. It showed how contraceptives worked, was a more honest discussion about how sex is both biological but your feelings are tied to it, etc. They did the condom on a broomstick thing (to show how stretchy it is), and talked about how to correctly roll it on the penis.
I wish everyone had had access to the 2nd one.
@@lordsneed9418 Is that in relation to this? "how having multiple partners ruins your ability to have intimate relationships moving forward - they used a bruised apple to explain it"
I'd argue that the thing that ruins intimate relationships (girlfriends, close friends, family) has less to do with the amount of sexual partners you have had and more on everything else - technology and social media dividing our attention, weakening of social ties (religion and local community are less important), the ability to move around more easily, in general life being sped up and more complicated.
I mean, the vibe they gave was that if you had sex once before marriage, that you were basically damaged forever and would never have a normal relationship (also, that you should immediately shun a partner if you find out they have had sex before). This is weird considering that most people have had somewhere around 5 sexual partners.
@@lordsneed9418
1) You're ascribing to me some pretty extreme points that I have never once said. You're either intentionally or unintentionally strawmanning me, and I don’t know which
a) “number of prior sexual partners has no effect on your ability to form long lasting relationships”
b”) “But it's just as wrong to say that no matter how many sexual partners and relationships you have, that on average has no detrimental effect on your ability to form a lifelong relationship."
I never once said either of these two points ^
In fact, my response to you opened with, "I'd argue that the thing that ruins intimate relationships (girlfriends, close friends, family) has less to do with the amount of sexual partners you have had and more on everything else". The key words there are "less to do", which means that I am openly acknowledging that they have some effect.
I even reclarified that the thing I thought was bad about the first sex-ed was that they said the extreme. That having more than one sexual partner in your life necessarily caused issues. They didn't say it *could* have an effect. They said that it necessarily would, which I completely disagree with.
2) "...if you have sex once before marriage means you'll never have a normal relationship is a gross exaggeration and wrong." If I had to sum up the general idea of what I thought they were trying to convey, it would be this sentence. Also, let me just clarify a definition, "intimate partners" doesn't just mean sexual/marital partner. They basically said it would seep into every part of your life, like how a bruise on an apple, although invisible on the outside, eventually leads the apple to being rotten to the core.
Just to end the fictional argument:
Whereas I am proposing the model : " number of prior sexual partners does have an effect on your ability to form long lasting relationships , and attention-dividing aspects of modern living also has an effect on your ability to form long lasting relationships.”
-I fully agree with this statement.
Again..
1. I do think that a greater number of partners can definitely have an effect on your ability to have intimate relationships.
2. I also think that the opposite is true. That the inability to form intimate relationships can lead to a greater number of sexual partners.
Thirdly...I think that they can not only directly feed into each other, but also into themselves.
If I were to give you some sort of point that you could disagree with me on it would probably be this..
I think that it's more likely that a persons inability to form intimate relationships has a relationship (causation) to the amount of sexual partners they have (versus the opposite). The exact reasons as to why they have problems forming intimate relationships would determine if that means the person has a high number (your example of some sexual trauma cases) or a low number (incels). I would also think that this metric would just be an overall better indicator on whether the person is, "bruised".
Actually, incels are probably a good group to point towards as most likely having lower scores of relationship satisfaction (in comparison to those that have had multiple partners), despite them having a "low body count."
Lastly, when I talked about, technology, lifestyle, religiosity, community, etc., my point was just that it damages people's ability to form intimate relationships (does this by: leaving us with a crappier set of tools for managing people/relationships, it being easier to view digestible media than spend time with people, fewer structures that tie us physically together, etc.).
Big sitch and Adam fan, big rags fan, like destiny. Love this
There was an echo during the ordinary gamers podcast too