Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at: / discord Music used in this video: Honkai Star Rail - Aberrant Receptacle #chess #ChessBut
After he says "Mission accomplished" I stop the video Sometimes I go to an older video and; place my cursor after he says "Mission accomplished" and press play then I cry
That guy must really like mangoes. There are two mangoes in their name, and an image of mango in their profile picture. And now, they suggest a challenge about mangoes.
Have not watched the video through yet: This challenge is actually easier than the drawback because your opponent doesn’t KNOW what your drawback is lol.
Do you think it's a language thing? Is he changing his interpretation to make the challenges easier or harder? Is it just farming engagement thru comments?
I interpreted it as "Every third move must be a king move", so moves 3, 6, 9, 12... This was more like "Every sequential set of three moves must have a kind move", so a kind move in 1-2-3, king move in 4-5-6... And there's also "There can never be three moves in a row without a king move", so after two non-king moves, a king move is forced. Are there other interpretations?
Yeah there's usually _an_ interpretation that doesn't match. But usually his interpretation is sensible, and it's about question writers not leaving in loopholes with ambiguous wording!
My explanation is that all comments are good comments for the algorithm. The algorithm doesn't care if it's positive or negative, it just sees a comment as a comment. And I'm guessing Simp knows this, and is using it to grow the channel
I genuinly think a "set of three moves" was supposed to be any set of three consecutive moves starting at any chosen one, which you'd have lost by move 5. It distinguishes itself from the challange "move the king every third move" by not forcing you to play a king move on let's say move 9 specifically if you've played one on move 8. I know your interpretation of the latter one is looser too though, basically the same as I would give for this one.
As others have pointed out, (1,7,11) and such are also sets of 3 moves. It never said sets of 3 consecutive moves. So the strictest interpretation only allows for 2 non-king moves at the start of the game. Personally, I say this one's on the challenge's wording for lacking clarity. Be careful when wishing on a monkey's paw or when issuing simp a challenge.
challenge failed. it was not "1 in 3 moves is a king move" it was "every third move" which means that if you have moved a non-king twice, you must move a king. those "get four moves" were just failing the challenge.
Honestly, not sure how to feel about the new outro! Cause it's cool but, we've had the other for YEARS! Of course. .... There's also the fun that comes from possible copyright threat on both those things so. Yeah, copyright safe outro.
@@ramonmullerrodrigues5822 Regardless of the copyright issue, the copyright free outro he picked is horrendous, there surely is better copyright free music he could use. The background visuals also seem off for this kind of channel.
2:35 that's a cowardly interpretation of the challenge. Once every three moves means that there shouldn't be three consecutive moves without a king move
@@-ZH yes but that's clearly not the intended challenge, otherwise the poster would say the king has to have moved sometime in the last 3 moves this is the challenge interpretation people would complain about in the comments
After he says "Mission accomplished" I stop the video
Sometimes I go to an older video and; place my cursor after he says "Mission accomplished" and press play
then I cry
Such a classic outro
grow up
1:36 We’re lucky that this guy isn’t exactly very aggressive.
The next move: Very aggressive.
That blunders an outro
Maybe best opening, but bad closing. Video skipped
No, it's a brilliant move for engagement
Why are people still complaining about the outro? He's already explained in the QnAs and with that last challenge that the old one isn't coming back.
@@danwar2489 Because I stopped watching the videos about 3 videos ago, hence "Video skipped"
@@danwar2489 which qna?
That guy must really like mangoes. There are two mangoes in their name, and an image of mango in their profile picture. And now, they suggest a challenge about mangoes.
Can confirm. In the discord server they pretty much only talk about mangoes all the time.
If we can’t have the old outro back, could you at least change to a different one? I don’t think the current outro fits very well
Yeah, it's too intense for a chess video outro.
Have not watched the video through yet: This challenge is actually easier than the drawback because your opponent doesn’t KNOW what your drawback is lol.
And sure enough, mission accomplished.
He always manages to interpret the challenges slightly different from how I expected...
Do you think it's a language thing? Is he changing his interpretation to make the challenges easier or harder? Is it just farming engagement thru comments?
His interpretation is exactly how I interpreted it…
I thought his interpretation was spot on.
I interpreted it as "Every third move must be a king move", so moves 3, 6, 9, 12...
This was more like "Every sequential set of three moves must have a kind move", so a kind move in 1-2-3, king move in 4-5-6...
And there's also "There can never be three moves in a row without a king move", so after two non-king moves, a king move is forced.
Are there other interpretations?
@@TlalocTemporalThe challenge says "every set of 3 moves". So moves 1,2,3 are a set, one of them must be a king move. Same with moves 4,5, and 6 etc.
I miss seeing Mashiro-tan from 'Engaged to the Unidentified' at the end of your videos but I'll still watch you cuz you're pretty cool I guess...
Bro fr gave out the full government name and everything 💀🙏
Holy, I had Star Rail open in the background, and when the video started, I got confused about why it was playing music if it was muted.
"Mangos? He sure does"
1:34 coward.
100 rated chess, but it drawback chess. You must reveal your challenge to your opponent.
The best opening, and the worse outro.
There is an interpretation where he loses the challenge.
By interpreting every set of 3 moves as (1,2,3)(2,3,4)(3,4,5)(4,5,6) etc.
If we go a step further, they don't even need to be consecutive. (3, 8, 14) is also a set of three moves.
@@Marco-ti8sx That would mean Simp can only move non king piece twice in the entire game
Yeah there's usually _an_ interpretation that doesn't match. But usually his interpretation is sensible, and it's about question writers not leaving in loopholes with ambiguous wording!
fuck it. Only move the king. Figure it out.
When simp says he's great at math because he's Asian, he means arithmetics. This reasoning don't apply to logic and set theory
RIP outro
i will literally fight chess simp in a normal game to get the last outro back
Didn't work last time someone tried
You should try the “peanuts” opening next
what does it mean?
@@vladthemagnificent9052 peanuts
Good grief!
6. Ke1
COWAAAAAAAARD
No testosterone
Bravo Simp! One of your best!
2:28
no, the "set" of moves resets continuously
Hidden code: Subscribe or all Mangoes You'll Eat Are sour (THAT SOUNDS LIKE A CURSE)
jokes on you I sacrifice some homeless guy down the street to the mango god every night, thus the curse won't work.
100 rated guy from Vietnam mirror match.
"if you'r watching me for a while" i'm on the fake simp train now. it explains outro
My explanation is that all comments are good comments for the algorithm. The algorithm doesn't care if it's positive or negative, it just sees a comment as a comment. And I'm guessing Simp knows this, and is using it to grow the channel
@mattevans4377 That's why you gotta unsuscribe and just not watch until the old outro is back
@@Desslosh Controversial opinion: I don't care about the outro.
Feel free to do what you want though, it's a free world (or should be)
@@Dessloshgrow up
as soon as I heard "4 5 6" I immediately thought of squid game
I genuinly think a "set of three moves" was supposed to be any set of three consecutive moves starting at any chosen one, which you'd have lost by move 5. It distinguishes itself from the challange "move the king every third move" by not forcing you to play a king move on let's say move 9 specifically if you've played one on move 8. I know your interpretation of the latter one is looser too though, basically the same as I would give for this one.
Breaking news: {3, 4, 5} not a set somehow.
how about "each check lets you capture/sacrifice a piece or pawn"
It said once EVERY set of three moves. (11,12,13) and (12,13,14) are also sets of three moves.
As others have pointed out, (1,7,11) and such are also sets of 3 moves. It never said sets of 3 consecutive moves. So the strictest interpretation only allows for 2 non-king moves at the start of the game.
Personally, I say this one's on the challenge's wording for lacking clarity. Be careful when wishing on a monkey's paw or when issuing simp a challenge.
I have a different interpretation where he needs to move his king on move 5
MAAAAAAAAAASHIROOOO
2:07
QxB !!
All he needed to title the video was “bongcloud is best opening”
Between 6. e1 and 2. e2 it's 4 moves... challenge lost (no king movement in 3. 4. and 5.)
Good noon, everyone.
Subscribe or all mangoes you’ll eat are sour.
Dislike every video until the outro gets fixed
W new intro
Where is the correct outro
challenge failed. it was not "1 in 3 moves is a king move" it was "every third move" which means that if you have moved a non-king twice, you must move a king. those "get four moves" were just failing the challenge.
reread the challenge
that's exactly what it says
literally "once every set of 3 moves"
Bring back the outro, if you're "not a coward"
Honestly, not sure how to feel about the new outro! Cause it's cool but, we've had the other for YEARS!
Of course.
.... There's also the fun that comes from possible copyright threat on both those things so.
Yeah, copyright safe outro.
Simp should do a video/post talking about the copyright threat.
@@ramonmullerrodrigues5822 Regardless of the copyright issue, the copyright free outro he picked is horrendous, there surely is better copyright free music he could use. The background visuals also seem off for this kind of channel.
I'm loving the new intro!
Your not just wrong your stupid
Me too!!!
Cheats on the rules, so challenge is invalidated, but UA-cam engagement is going great I suppose.
u actually lost bc on the set of moves 25, 26, 27, therefore u lost the challenge
Technically, (1,7,19) is also a set of three moves. So, only two non-King moves allowed
If the old outro isn't coming back you should at least get a different new intro that's better
This outro sucks
Skipped straight to the outro. Illegal move ❌
I'm gonna unsub if the outro doesn't change back.
Oh, the king shouldn't move backward, don't be a coward.
I hope you leave
And we might not resub so better change it quick
Can't wait for all these guys to unsub so I don't have to read all these entitled whiners' comments anymore
@camsy83 simp and a coward
bending rules, not very manly
I don't know why everyone loves the old outro so much
Day 2 of asking commenters not to be dicks about the outro
I'd literally be okay with the outro if it means we get to still hear the music. Idc about the anime part, even if it's now iconic for you.
Were there always hidden messages related to the challenge?
yes
@vladthemagnificent9052 dang I'm blind.
2:35 that's a cowardly interpretation of the challenge.
Once every three moves means that there shouldn't be three consecutive moves without a king move
Those who know
is he playing with 100 elo guys? boring ngl
love the outro
*posts your doxx*
Betrayal
Your not just wrong your stupid
Mission failed, Didn't move your king on move 14 while you hadn't moved it on move 11, 12 or 13
You failed the challenge on move 5, every set of three moves means every set, and the set of 3, 4, and 5 has no king move.
Isn't a set usually 1, 2, 3 then 4, 5, 6?
It's every 3 sets of moves, the first set is 1-2-3, the next set is 4-5-6, etc. He moved King on move 2 and 6, so he's fine.
@@crushme2233
There is an interpretation where he loses the challenge.
By interpreting every set of 3 moves as (1,2,3)(2,3,4)(3,4,5)(4,5,6) etc.
@@-ZH yes but that's clearly not the intended challenge, otherwise the poster would say the king has to have moved sometime in the last 3 moves
this is the challenge interpretation people would complain about in the comments