Such an interesting conversation, they should invite Pordan Jeterson Edit: after seeing so many variations I am now always unsure what his correct name is
Actually what makes it so amazing is that its not only absurd. The way it was escalating into leftside jordan trying to convince rightjordan to the fact that everything should be show and entertaintment, that there is no point on trying to make the world a better place and all that, and finally near the end rightjordan explaining by taking the position of what leftjordan was proposing, turned the tables and showed what it actually feels like. I mean. Fuck, man. Its a lot. I was expecting to be just humorous but he constructed a whole narrative here.
Cousin Justin bro that’s disgusting have some respect u sexist! Btw Sara you’re super beautiful, I would love to take you out some time, you look like u have a really nice personality I think we’d connect
For a second I thought it was real, I doubted my mind of the editing. Scary by weird. I never seen two patersons. Paterson would dislike this as it is postmodernism. Yeah, it's a funny joke. Light hearted.
Considering in his critique of the Communist Manifesto, that is exactly what he recommends people do. Upon having an idea, you should never take it for the truth immediately, but should assault it with every argument and contradiction you have, to ensure that it is as true as you believe it to be. Or as he said it: "Every idea you've ever had, is wrong."
Soon there's going to be so much JP on the net, that you'd be able to deep fake every ludicrous statement from him without much editing, especially if you add him reciting his books.
I love how not only does it make sense in a way that it sounds like an actual conversation. But it also feels like both of them have distinct personalities about them. Genius Editing!
Well, let's say there are many conversations, say, like you might think of communicating with someone, okay? That's a conversation. But say there is a matrix of many conversations, and you can do this, you can clump them into groups. Based on various topics, let's say. And then you can rank them based on metrics of quality. We do this all the time. And, I think from that... You know Carl Jung....
...who thought of this? Who found the time to make it? How are these people not receiving awards for this? Thank you, heroes of the internet. Thank you.
@@DCoWorld Mmh... Considering that this was made by an AI makes it less cool somehow... I hope that was not the case. I appreciate human effort put into these kind of things. Also, if AIs are actually this good at creating content, tli think that could be dangerous. This could be spelling the end of human creativity, and the cap of it. Little by little we will rely upon AIs more and more until nothing new will be created anymore and we'll just get remixes of things done in the past. I guess we could argue that this is was has been happening already, but I don't think that's quite right. Humans do recombine old stuff to create new, but we tend to add something special every now and again (Last Samurai is not just another Dances with wolves, as it is not just another Pocahontas... and even Avatar, for as boring as it is to me, has something new to offer to this formula). Anyways... I'm rambling. Merry Xmas.
@@DCoWorld well, I didn't mean to be conspiratorial or anything. I was just expressing my sadness at the prospect of being witnesses of the death of human creativity; but if, as you suggest, AIs are indeed aware now and making decisions, that sounds cool. That could be the next step in evolution. We gave birth to a new kind of real intelligence and now it will be its turn to do what it considers best, just as we've done for thousands of years. Exciting :)
What made it funniest for me was the fact that I could see two people arguing like that. The editor was able to keep JBP alive in there and also maintain two consistent personalites. Very nice!
Now imagine Jordan Peterson sitting at home watching this, nodding and saying mmmhm..... -25k likes? This is appearantly the funniest thing I've ever said...
I first watched this right when it came out and the source interviews were fresh in my mind. I returned every few months or so for the past five years (it's been that long!!!) and the meaning changes every time. This truly belongs in the UA-cam Hall of Fame.
When Jordon pauses in the middle of a discussion, I always thought it was because he was thinking carefully. But now I know that this.. this is whats going on in his head in those moments.
Much of that is owed to the fact he is actually not directing those offenses at the person that's in front of him and in this video not only he's made to look like he is but he is the one that's on the receiving side of the fake fit of rage as well. So yeah, i guess thats why its so amazing
When Peter Jordanson says, "Brilliant, brilliant book," he's acknowledging Jordan Peterson's book. When he says "First of all, poorly written," he is addressing the 12 Rules For Life, which is only an inspiration for Jordan Peterson's book. Peter Jordanson is attacking the inspiration for the book, not the book itself.
"Well really, it's quite a complex issue. First you have to define what you mean by pounds. One could easily lift a 50 pounds in paper money, yet struggle with a bag of concrete."
I beg to differ, Jordans thoughts are very much driven by financial gains and making the ends justify the means. He's a very disturbed man and he's propagating his destructive disposition into his awaiting audience. That's not a good thing.
when Carl Jung said "face your shadow," this is what he meant. edit: also Nietzsche when he said "if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."
+Lackey Shaysu I think we might see the best debate history has ever seen if you got Dave Rubin and Jordan Peterson vs Rave Dubin and Peter Jordanson in one room.
Film Buff 92 more like? what the fuck are you talking about that’s exactly how it doesn’t go you imbecilic idiot fuck. It was right in the original comment it didn’t need your dumbass backwards response.
And he even matched their outfits the whole time. I can't believe how much of a coincidence it must've been, but to spot it and make it this good, this is really art.
@Dylan [Smith] Nah most people aren't equipped to actually engage with the alt-right. Not saying they're intellectual powerhouses or anything, but they've been practicing their bullshit points in the mirror for years so they can at least present themselves as being knowledgeable. Most people don't know the real facts by heart and can't fact check their false claims on the spot. And by going into the dirty details of most of their points is just going to make it look like you're doing mental gymnastics to the average person, while speaking in simple platitudes like the alt-right does is going to appeal to young teens and people who identify as centrists. That and a myriad of other argumentative tricks and a lot of people will find themselves on the losing side of a debate with an alt-righter. They're extremely intellectually dishonest and are perfectly happy to bubble under the surface of youth culture while people like you reinforce the idea that they themselves want to push: that they aren't a big deal. You can find posts in ar discords and forums about "hiding your power level" and defaulting to "im joking" and "im memeing" as a defense so they can always claim plausible deniability. And this is effective af. The AR are the ones who turned the "ok" hand sign into a white power symbol just by agreeing to meme it into one, the AR made everyone talk about their "it's okay to be white campaign" and very few people who talk about it even mention the AR origin of the phrase and just focus on the content of the phrase while ignoring the intentions. I'm not saying the AR is the biggest problem the country's facing today, far from it, but they aren't to be underestimated. Especially when we're talking about the effect they've been having on the youth.
@@Michael-wo4wc Alright I’m not sure if you're memeing or not because these are textbook alt-right talking points. I didn't appreciate your attempt to reframe the conversation to get me to defend a strawman I strongly don't believe in: that other identity groups aren't as toxic as the alt-right. They are. But the conversation topic is about the alt-right. Groups like Hotep and ISIS are just as toxic to the young minds of their targets as well. They're also much less effective at branding as the alt-right is, which was again, the topic of the conversation: the alt-right's ability to brand. So stop trying to reframe the topic to anything but the alt-right. Instead of going with my initial inclination that you're either an alt-right sympathizer with good intentions at best or an alt-righter badly attempting to hide their power level at worst, I’m going to do for you what you wouldn't do for me and assume you have no horse in the race for one side or the other. I’m not going to play the minority victim game in the same way that you tried to play the white victim game. I'm going to assume that you, like me, just want to get to the bottom of what’s real. So let's get to it. *The Inevitability of Identity Politics In A Multiracial Society* I agree with this assertion in the same way that I agree there would be a lot less theft if we removed everyone's hands. Of course in order to have Identity Politics related to race in a society, there needs to be multiple races or at least the perception of multiple races. However, even in a single racial society, identity politics will still exist. There will still be men and women, gays and straights, atheists and theists, cis and trans, democrats and republicans, older generations and younger generations. Even without race all of these identity dividers will exist. It's not sad, it's just reality. *The Alt-Right Makes You Sad, But What Makes Me Sad Is The Thousands Of White Cities That Turned Black Or Brown And Are Now Unsafe Shells Of Their Former Glory* This is a baseless claim that I’m not going to accept without any proof. Proof I doubt you're willing to provide, because it's gonna take a lot more than a single link to objectively prove this statement. You're only using this to virtue signal and try and claim a moral high ground over me. Are we interested in what's real or what you believe? Abandon this point unless you have the facts and data to back it up, without that it's baseless propaganda. *America Has A Drastic Difference In IQ and Crime Rate In Regards To Whites, Browns, and Blacks, With IQ Starting At The Top For Whites And Scaling Down Through Browns To Blacks, While Crime Rate Scales Down At Whites And Increases from Browns To Blacks* So your logic is that race and IQ are clearly linked with a propensity to commit crime. You’ve linked together all of this stuff as being related, but you missed one crucial factor: wealth. According to your list, wealth also scales with it being the highest for whites, medium for “browns” (from henceforth, “browns” is gonna refer to Hispanic), and is the lowest for blacks. People who live in poverty often can only access homes with abnormal amounts of lead in them in the paint or in the water. Intake of lead at an early age is indicative of a propensity toward violence later in life, and a lower IQ. Not to mention, pregnant mothers ingest and breathe in the lead, and this combined with other poor prenatal care practices linked with poverty such as poor nutrition results in a lower IQ. One of the best ways to raise your IQ is by education, but if you're living in a poor community the schools in your district are highly likely to be shitty and underfunded, particularly in regards to after school programs, which keep kids and teens from getting involved in crime or from becoming single parents. You can't fuck Tammy if you're at soccer practice. If you're going to class hungry everyday, you’re not getting the most out of an already sub par education and you're much more likely to make bad decisions. This cycle repeats itself just as violently on the kids of people in these situations due to generational wealth. There are plenty of studies that show that economic mobility is dependent on the economic standing of your parents. Chance are if you're born rich, you stay rich, chances are if you're born poor, you stay poor. Tracing the lineage of your average black American today back to just their grandparents has them living in Jim Crow era, redlining era, separate but equal era. They weren't living in times in which getting a strong foothold on the economy was viable for most blacks, and generational wealth is now reflected in the current black population. We can mitigate this by addressing the problem and getting the government involved to reverse the trends. We saw this happen in the 60s and the number of black Americans making enough to be considered middle class has doubled to almost 50% since then. In other words, poverty is much more indicative of your IQ than race is, and poverty is also more indicative of your propensity to commit crime. A dumbfuck low IQ Rockefeller isn't gonna grow up and decide to rob a liquor store because he's just that stupid, but even the brightest high IQ black kid living in a fucked up environment is gonna have to take a drink of water at some point, and he's gonna be surrounded by adults and his peers who’re doing shady shit. Inb4 the twin studies meme: don't say it, link it. Not an article about it, link the study itself. But my point for this has already been stated: poor prenatal care can cause you to have a lower IQ. Also P.S: look up the median age of your average white person, hispanic person, and black person. White people have less young people among their populations while hispanics and blacks have more. When you control for age, the crime rates become a lot more similar (the difference disappears between hispanics and whites) because young people are more likely to commit crime than older people. *There Are Studies The Show Neighbors Are More Mistrustful Of Each Other In Multiracial Societies* Accepting this to be true without digging any deeper into logical questions like “where were these studies conducted, in what manner, and by whom,” I’m not surprised. This is called consciousness of kind, it is a mental appendix in that it is an evolutionary brain tick that fools you into arbitrarily identifying with people that look like you. It usually doesn't last past the first conversation you have with someone, because at that point if they look like you and they're a douche, you’ll cease to identify with them. But if they look nothing like you and you find common ground, you will begin to identify with them. This isn't something to succumb to, it's something to rise above like kids who are afraid of the monsters in their closet. Merely fear of the unknown we are perfectly capable of rising against but only if we acknowledge that the feelings of togetherness we feel when we see a stranger that looks like us isn't real. To remind you of this: the grand majority of people who are murdered in America are murdered by someone of their own race. Another point to make here is that interaction leads to trust, you are unlikely to trust someone you've never interacted with. Social gatherings between neighbors have been declining ever since the television came about, so this “mistrust” between neighbors can almost certainly be applied to the fact that many people probably don't know their neighbors.
@@Michael-wo4wc *But Guess What Group Of All Is Least Tribal? Whites* This is pure opinion, pure speculation, and you're gonna have to give me some hard data if you wanna back it up. Otherwise I’m dismissing it as a feeling you have because it 100% *is* just a feeling you pulled out of your ass. We're not interested in your feelings, we're interested in what’s real. *The Alt-Right Is Just One Pro-White Political Movement Meanwhile There Are Thousands Of Hispanic, Black, Jewish, And Asian Groups; But You Don't Attack Them* There goes the reframing again. You don't know what I attack, but if you reframe it this way it makes white people into a victim. Nice attempt at the victim game, but it's ultimately futile. The Alt-Right isn't just a pro-white movement, it's a pro-white anti-everyone else movement. And it isn't the only one of its kind. That's also besides the point, because the Alt-Right itself isn't so much the issue, but its that their ideas very slyly seep into the minds of unsuspecting ignorant people like yourself, and as you go on to innocently parrot their talking points, you normalize their views and shift the Overton window further and further toward objectively fascist concepts. You can do all of this without ever identifying as Alt-Right and believing yourself to be the least racist person on Earth. Now, to address the thousands of other identitarian groups: name me ten from each racial group you’ve listed since there are thousands of them and the tangible effect they've had on society and political discourse that is equivalent to the Alt-Right’s in the past decade and maybe I’ll start worrying about them too. For now, I’m more concerned about an ideologically subversive group that targets people who are a part of the largest ethnic group in the country that holds the most seats in the house, the senate, the supreme court, and the president’s cabinet. *Left’s Cultural Marxist Anti-White Villainization. Everything Wrong In The World? White Man’s Fault* This is the part that makes me think you're not serious. I love the cultural marxism meme. You do know that empty phrase was coined by fear mongerers that would go on to form the actual nazi party, right? Whatever. Can you just explain to me what cultural marxism means to you? Also, I love the complete rational disconnect in the Alt-Right's logic. You say they're more on the side of truth than I wanna admit? Okay. Well the Alt-Right loves to take credit for making the world the way it is today, that Western Society rose and saved the world from our savage selves. And that this was all thanks to white men, because all the other races don't have high enough IQs, they're too stupid and violent to have any impact on the world outside of destroying themselves and others. Yet the Alt-Right cries whenever white men get blamed for any negative aspect of the current state of the world they themselves are always trying to take credit for shaping. I don't understand. The majority of extremely powerful national superpowers for the last two centuries have had white leaders. Pretty much every policy in existence in America right now was put into effect by a majority of whites. White people make up the majority of “western nations.” The Alt-Right loves to tell other races to get their shit together and accept responsibility for their actions, but they never wanna do the same for the evils of white history and they individually aren't even responsible for any of it, there shouldn't be any reason to deny it but they do. Because that's how deep their whiteness is attached to their sense of identity. They don't even wanna acknowledge that poor innocent freedom loving whites could've ever done anything wrong in the past. The Alt-Right isn't on the side of truth, they're on the side of whatever makes white people look best and everyone else look worse. And they'll present whatever half truths they have to you so you can repeat their surface level fool’s talking points like a machine gun, which forces someone like me to write an essay to debunk it all. But because most people are fools, they're gonna come away with the foolish talking point without doing any research of their own or engaging with any of the nuance of what they're saying. *If You Want To End Identity Politics And Promote Individualism, Start With Black Women Who Vote Like 99% In Unison While Attacking The Most Freedom Loving Group Of White Men* Okay so, I never said I wanted to end identity politics. Mostly because I don't think it's possible as I stated earlier. I wanna mitigate it by debunking victim narrative bullshit like this. Black women vote 99% in unison on what issues in what states? I’m having a hard time believing black women in California feel the same way about gay marriage as black women in Alabama. If you're just talking about party lines, have you ever considered that one party over the other has stronger policies that favor the plight of many black women (like birth control initiatives, education, police brutality, healthcare) while the other party doesn't. I just love the framing here: 99% of black women are a hive mind and the poor innocent freedom loving white males are having their freedom loving ideas attacked. As if the hive mind of black women doesn't love freedom and isn't actively trying to increase their own level of freedom via the policies they support. “Freedom” is a vague virtue that's easy to spit out and virtue signal with, but it's more complicated than that. Sure I’m free to buy a Maserati and drive it down the freeway with the top down but only if I have the economic ability to do so. Your level of “Freedom” in this world is dictated entirely by class and your economic standing. So it doesn't surprise me that a minority of the poorest people in the country progressively fighting to increase their own individual economic freedoms might come into ideological contention with the majority of the wealthiest people in the country fighting to conserve a system that’s already benefits them and gives them more freedoms than others whether they realize it or not. So it doesn't surprise me that the poor freedom loving white men might feel so attacked when black women bring their grievances to the marketplace of ideas. Naturally if it ain't broke, don't fix it, so any progressive ideas echoed by black women around the country are just going to be considered an attack on whiteness by privileged white men. Especially when you throw some good ol’ fashioned fear mongering in like “thousands of white cities have gone to shit because of the blacks and the browns” and tell them everything they wanna hear, like that they're the most virtuous, non-tribal, peaceful, freedom loving people on Earth. I don't mean to come off as harsh and rude to you, because I really don't wanna perpetuate your victim narrative. But I hope that after reading all this shit, you come away at least questioning the legitimacy of what you've heard and seen from the AR and AR sympathizers and useful idiots for the AR that may not be affiliated, but are even more effective at getting their ideas to spread than an actual self identified member. If you haven't actually looked into a talking point, don't bring it up here at the digital water-cooler just so you have something to say and a victim narrative to feel nice and victimized by.
Seeing Jordan Peterson out of context, acting like he is and talking about having 4 affairs with intelligent, beautiful women to himself is truly amazing and holy crap this is better than most movies
@Joaquín Jiménez Thank you, you beautiful being! That's the video and it's not on his channel, it's here on Shamien ua-cam.com/video/TZ6H3AZGnTo/v-deo.html
There is a kind of weird genius in this. The people making these kinds of videos have revolutionized the genre of montage, and they (this guy, for example) have a particular talent for it that nobody knew existed before now.
There are other people that can do that. some of them aren't very good though. ua-cam.com/users/Abu5ernamevideos ua-cam.com/video/onkLFOKyhXQ/v-deo.html
Jordan Peterson - Successful book writer - Great with women - Works out - Considered a genius - Plays the game Peter Jordanson - Loser - Rejected by women - In bad shape - Not considered an intellectual - Doesn’t play the game Who's side are you on?
That’s one of the most brilliant things I’ve ever seen. Peterson is such the perfect character to use for this mock-up. I was crying, I was laughing so hard.
Such an interesting conversation, they should invite Pordan Jeterson
Edit: after seeing so many variations I am now always unsure what his correct name is
Lmfaoooo my stomach
Don't forget Jeter Pordanson
I flat out forgot his real name for a sec
@@UltraPenguin720 or Tejer Dorpanson
Pordan Jeterson and Jeter Pordanson are busy in a meeting with Peter Jordan.
When you read a book and they stop labeling the characters.
Accurate af
what is lebeling?
@@nefelibata4190 labeling
When you're watching Watership Down.
Lmao
I love how they obviously hate each other, but neither yells or interrupts the other.
Passive aggressive
666 likes I'm scare
Its called etiquette.
True intellectuals will know.
It's so Canadian.
The moment you realize you're going insane is when you start finding some deep profound meaning in this conversation.
Same bro
Actually what makes it so amazing is that its not only absurd. The way it was escalating into leftside jordan trying to convince rightjordan to the fact that everything should be show and entertaintment, that there is no point on trying to make the world a better place and all that, and finally near the end rightjordan explaining by taking the position of what leftjordan was proposing, turned the tables and showed what it actually feels like.
I mean. Fuck, man. Its a lot. I was expecting to be just humorous but he constructed a whole narrative here.
ik plz help
holy shit bro you saw it too lmao!!!! @@anabellarivolta
there wasnt really anything "left wing" about that it was just random nonsense. he didn't say anything about economic systems.
This is undeniably impossible to top. This is content.
it's up there, with others: ua-cam.com/video/dOOQ1ZCeMY4/v-deo.html
456 likes for having a pussy
Now 563
How many men have you put in graves?
Cousin Justin bro that’s disgusting have some respect u sexist! Btw Sara you’re super beautiful, I would love to take you out some time, you look like u have a really nice personality I think we’d connect
@@Euphoriasmotion2011 r/woooosh
its scary how well edited this is
For a second I thought it was real, I doubted my mind of the editing. Scary by weird. I never seen two patersons. Paterson would dislike this as it is postmodernism. Yeah, it's a funny joke. Light hearted.
it's impressive to behold...
Who says it’s edited
It's very awkward at times though. Some of it is good when they don't overdo it and it feels natural.
Yeah for sure, the reactions are spot on.
When things got heated, I got scared and started tidying up my room.
I hope you made your bed.
hahahahahahahah
hahahahhahahahahahahhaa
hahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahha
@@evening_awning hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahahahah
How in all hell did I miss this for 5 years?! This is gold content. I'm in stiches.
I’m wondering the same damn thing
Same 😂
Same
Same 😂😂 I’m so glad the algorithm found me worthy
Meanwhile the rest of us have watched it a dozen times since it came out, lol
"I've had 3 affairs and they were all successful"
That killed me 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Aren't I a great guy???
That was the greatest line ever 🤣
"and I've never been caught"
"it's like.. cool, you know..."
I imagine Jordan actually having these conversations in his head.
I am certain that this is a faithful depiction of his internal struggles
Pujordan Badjonkerson!
That's not hard to imagine
I imagined! now what?
Considering in his critique of the Communist Manifesto, that is exactly what he recommends people do.
Upon having an idea, you should never take it for the truth immediately, but should assault it with every argument and contradiction you have, to ensure that it is as true as you believe it to be.
Or as he said it: "Every idea you've ever had, is wrong."
Jordan Peterson just shared this on his Instagram HAHAHAHA he watched it
He posted it yesterday but your comment is a oneonth old, wth is going on !!!!!
@@oussamanechnache7133 yeah what the fuck he predicts the future
Oussama Nechnache
He's a time traveler.
wait he has an instagram ? help i cant find him
@@catgormon7108 @jordan B. Peterson
6 years later and still solid gold. great job on a well executed video. thank you for sharing your creativity. made me laugh out loud even still.
The most empty but complicated conversation ever.
Every his lecture is complicated haha 😅
That's pretty much JP in a nutshell
@@ingnewton Nutshell by alice in chains in mtv's unplugged is awesome
@@SalamiNinjaful Mike Awesome was an ECW wrestler who sadly killed himself a few years ago.
Literally every conversation ever
The fact this sounds like a genuine conversation is scary
Both have their own personality, it's the best fake interview out there
Seriously.
It’s a good video maker
The editing is simply brilliant. 😂🤣
Soon there's going to be so much JP on the net, that you'd be able to deep fake every ludicrous statement from him without much editing, especially if you add him reciting his books.
“I could lift 50 lbs”
“Noooo, I don’t think so.” lol
Time stamp??
4:36~ 😂
@Green Space That's really entertaining
Hahaha UA-cam just showing what CNN ABC does all the time. Taking conversations out of context. They’re a joke
Lol that's just too much
I love how not only does it make sense in a way that it sounds like an actual conversation. But it also feels like both of them have distinct personalities about them. Genius Editing!
This is the best conversation I have ever seen. Roughly speaking.
It's at least in the top 10, anyways.
LOL, the "roughly speaking" is perfect
Your comment is self evidently hilarious!
Depends upon what you mean by "best conversation"
Well, let's say there are many conversations, say, like you might think of communicating with someone, okay? That's a conversation. But say there is a matrix of many conversations, and you can do this, you can clump them into groups. Based on various topics, let's say. And then you can rank them based on metrics of quality. We do this all the time. And, I think from that... You know Carl Jung....
“brilliant book”
Next second
“Poorly written”
the duality of man
"Poor grasp of life. Second of all... You have no-idea what the hell you're talking about."
Jordan Peterson: *Damn! hmm hummm. He might have a point*
"Arguably the greatest non-fiction book of the 20th century"
He was being sarcastic 😂
"Poorly written.. at best"
I have to agree with Jordan Peterson on this one, honestly.
No I agree more with Peter Jordanson.
You’re both wrong. Jeter Pordanson would set you two straight!!!
@@owenpalmer757 consider the lobster tho bro
I changed my mind, Peter son of Jordan is clearly more right
Clean your room bucko
...who thought of this?
Who found the time to make it?
How are these people not receiving awards for this?
Thank you, heroes of the internet. Thank you.
Couldn't have said it better mate. 😂
A.i editing can do so much and this is just the start
@@DCoWorld Mmh... Considering that this was made by an AI makes it less cool somehow... I hope that was not the case. I appreciate human effort put into these kind of things. Also, if AIs are actually this good at creating content, tli think that could be dangerous. This could be spelling the end of human creativity, and the cap of it. Little by little we will rely upon AIs more and more until nothing new will be created anymore and we'll just get remixes of things done in the past.
I guess we could argue that this is was has been happening already, but I don't think that's quite right. Humans do recombine old stuff to create new, but we tend to add something special every now and again (Last Samurai is not just another Dances with wolves, as it is not just another Pocahontas... and even Avatar, for as boring as it is to me, has something new to offer to this formula).
Anyways... I'm rambling.
Merry Xmas.
Burps!@£%
@@DCoWorld well, I didn't mean to be conspiratorial or anything. I was just expressing my sadness at the prospect of being witnesses of the death of human creativity; but if, as you suggest, AIs are indeed aware now and making decisions, that sounds cool. That could be the next step in evolution. We gave birth to a new kind of real intelligence and now it will be its turn to do what it considers best, just as we've done for thousands of years.
Exciting :)
You either die a Jordan Peterson or you live long enough to see yourself become a Peter Jordanson
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
Lmaaaooo
Good one
Underrated comment right here!
omg that is priceless. Thank you.
Jordan Peterson made some fair points but Peter Jordanson's ideas are clearly more realistic.
Peter Jordanson a bitch tho
That's nearly the exact opposite of what Hick N said!
Nailed it
@@a.douggoodwin610 Well Hick N is a hillbilly so I wouldn't take him too seriously.
@@Asimo44 Lmao Hick N!
The unstoppable force vs the immovable object
More like the unstoppable force vs the unstoppable force.
ua-cam.com/video/WXYuqrO8LLo/v-deo.html
Jordan peterson is a gas lighting hypocritical con artist and he has tricked you.
@Aesthetic Decision explain
Greetings, I see you've ended up here too :D
@@lichtishlogistics or the immovable object vs the immovable object...
5 years and this still one of the best videos on youtube
Tyler Fischer impersonation is also amazing
"All the women are rejecting you?"
Moment of silence
With a sad face "Right"
Lol yeah that part was gold
So good, lol
"so u wanna play that game?"
This actually put me on the floor laughing. His look! Lol
TOOBASED
Jordan Peterson absolutely *DESTROYS* Jordan Peterson.
Peter Jordanson*
@@BallyBoy95 him too
only Jordan Peterson can destroy Peter jordanson..
*AND LOGIC*
I know right
You are now at the peak of the editing hierarchy...
I need 5% of those skills...damn!
0:48 Peak Lobster Posture on Editing Skillz.
That was on point
M Dogg perfect comment
10/10 head lobster
What made it funniest for me was the fact that I could see two people arguing like that. The editor was able to keep JBP alive in there and also maintain two consistent personalites.
Very nice!
Jordan Peterson: *exists*
Peter Jordanson: "Finally, a worthy opponent!"
It should be vice versa
Our discourse will be LEGENDARY ✊
pordan jeterson : am i a joke to you
LOOOOOOOOL!
Our debate will be legendary.
Now imagine Jordan Peterson sitting at home watching this, nodding and saying mmmhm.....
-25k likes? This is appearantly the funniest thing I've ever said...
Paul Kojack I dm this to him don’t worry
and then he deconstructs it with the use of post-modernist ideas *roughly speaking
This cracked me up
@@Victorius post modernism is freaking usless
Man, that's so fuuunnny :)))))))))))), i'm dying
Jordan Peterson's frequent usage of that indirect 2nd person is what made this so great. Like holy shit, the editing here is genius.
Good observation.
That's the best way to explain how this works, my mum just thought he must have been a dick to who he's talking to
well thank you i pride myself on my editing skills!!!
This is how Greeks talk in a hypothetical term, using the indirect 2nd person. Surely, he has learned from the fathers of philosophy.
It's amazing some people get along without liberal use of the subjective "you"
I first watched this right when it came out and the source interviews were fresh in my mind. I returned every few months or so for the past five years (it's been that long!!!) and the meaning changes every time. This truly belongs in the UA-cam Hall of Fame.
“Some losers lose all the time,”
“Which is the side you occupy.”
Ouch
*Bold* of you to assume I'm playing a game I can lose
Lmfao
From wich interview is that part?
Which interview is that part from
And all the women are rejecting you
“It’s a great book”
Ten seconds letter
“Very poorly written”
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
How do you think we got 50 Shades?
Peter Jordanson tried using sarcasm, but Jordan Peterson didn't understand the sarcasm, so Peter Jordanson had to try to make things clear again.
**later
He's obviously being sarcastic :)
I'm nominating this for best video of 2018.
It’s pretty funny
This should have been in UA-cam rewind.
Almost pissed myself laughing
Clicked on it by mistake
Woah! Didn’t expect to see you here hahaha
I’ll seconded that motion.
Bro, I never comment on anything at all but this is SOOOO GOOOD, I laughed so much, a piece of art. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I see Jordan Peterson and I see Peter Jordanson but where is Pordan Jeterson?
Vs Son of Dan Porjeter
Adam Jensenson... the year is 2027...
Shen bapiro ate him
Engaging in rough and tumble play with Porter Jedanson.
@@JPDillon Sorry to inform you but Porter Jedanson was killed by a lobster while swimming
Peter Jordanson: You aren’t in very good shape
Jordan Peterson: Screw you
Lol
Someone needs to go get their chiky nuggies
Peter Jordanson
3:51
xD
When Jordon pauses in the middle of a discussion, I always thought it was because he was thinking carefully. But now I know that this.. this is whats going on in his head in those moments.
This is what thinking carefully looks like.
Jordan Peterson is an idiot.
you deserve an award for that comment (sarcasm, moron)
Broly Cancer if this man is an idiot then we have a world full of idiots. (and maybe we do)
@@M1sterE321 this is literally the same guy who called atheism a religion.
I never saw an edit so well done! What the heeeeellll!!!!
Loved it!
this is how black holes are formed
Lol
Lol.. good 1
This is how matter and anti-matter equal zero.
Peterson's personality is already a black hole...
@@arnoelful Leaving Uncle Matter alone, with no one to love him.
I hope Jordan Peterson some day sees this.
King Dippy he probably will
Uhhhh he just did.
Jon Lee any reaction from him yet? I'd love to see that.
totally, and his reaction must be recorded
King Dippy h
This is 10 times funnier when you realise Jordan Peterson has watched and enjoyed this.
did he? is it on record somewhere? would love to see the reaction
Cyrano ua-cam.com/video/TZ6H3AZGnTo/v-deo.html
Did Peter Jordanson watch it too?
Did he really?!
@@moonspoon2333 HAHHA I love Will Witt
This deserves an award, it’s genuinely a masterpiece in editing.
"Some losers lose all the time, and that's the side you occupy." Brutal!
FATALITY!
JenoPaciano and all the women are rejecting you.
something about jordan peterson critizising himself is the funniest shit ever.
I absolutely love JBP. And this was funny as [censored]. XD
That’s why they made it.
Much of that is owed to the fact he is actually not directing those offenses at the person that's in front of him and in this video not only he's made to look like he is but he is the one that's on the receiving side of the fake fit of rage as well. So yeah, i guess thats why its so amazing
@@Tricolorrr533 did you just explain that he actually isn’t talking to himself?
@@MalAnders94 i explained why i believe it's so funny as the commenter above us couldn't especifically pinpoint the reason. May i lend you my glasses?
“All the women are rejecting you?” “Right” “It’s you” 😆
i am dying everytime i listen to this xD
Jordan Peterson got absolutely destroyed. HAHA
@@dreadfulmouse nah, Peterson did great, now Peter Jordanson, on the other hand, got completely annihilated in this debate
I felt that...
"The thing is its complicated.."
"Yeah yeah, all the women are rejecting you?"
It's the "yep" that get me 💀😂
“Brilliant brilliant book...”
2 seconds later
“First of all poorly written...”
Poorly written... AT BEST.
oof!
Second of all: You don't know what the hell you're talking about.
Actually, Peter Jordanson was talking about the 12 rules of life in the second quote
When Peter Jordanson says, "Brilliant, brilliant book," he's acknowledging Jordan Peterson's book. When he says "First of all, poorly written," he is addressing the 12 Rules For Life, which is only an inspiration for Jordan Peterson's book. Peter Jordanson is attacking the inspiration for the book, not the book itself.
I know right, what a hypocrite
When you and your bro choose the same character in street fighter
Olin Scharm *Mortal Kombat
Holy shit
Yes
Ryu and evil Ryu?
Best !
"I've had issues with harassment, child abuse, but I can lift 50 pounds"
"50 pounds is quite alot"
"That's just too much!"
...we don't need to address this issue....
"Well really, it's quite a complex issue. First you have to define what you mean by pounds. One could easily lift a 50 pounds in paper money, yet struggle with a bag of concrete."
@@chady025 no it's not, 50 pounds it's like....
@@quantumleap4023 they would both weigh the same amount but the paper would be far harder to lift due to the fact that it is less compact
So, much, TIME. Thanks for this, your a superstar, funny as hell!
An immovable object VS an unstoppable force
LMFAOOOOOO im dead
An immovable force VS an unstoppable object
An immovable object will not move duh, but the unstoppable Force will just bounce off of it. If that makes sense . Sorry for broken eng
An unstoppable move VS an unobjectable force
Excellent comment! It's so Peterson, hahahaha!
I bet Jordan's thoughts in his head are quite similar to this.
Nic B. Real fans will understand
Lmao
I beg to differ, Jordans thoughts are very much driven by financial gains and making the ends justify the means.
He's a very disturbed man and he's propagating his destructive disposition into his awaiting audience.
That's not a good thing.
@@PitchUpCampsiteReviews jesus man can't take a joke lmao
tf out of here pseudo psychologist
Can't take advice from things which refuse to show themselves
when Carl Jung said "face your shadow," this is what he meant.
edit: also Nietzsche when he said "if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."
Haha nice one
brilliant
Your *P E R S O N A* doesn't shout "intellectual".
FORTY SIX AND TWO JUST AHEAD OF ME!!!!!
Yessss
I'm a huge Jordan Peterson fan, but this is the funniest thing that I've seen in a loooong time. Bravo! Long live freedom and long live great humor!!
Please go read a book and stop following this clown 🤦♀️
This is some schizophrenia level geniousness.
I have that all the time
Tokero I don’t think he did friend.
I have schizophrenia and I think I'm pretty dumb
I'm dumb and I dont have schizophrenia so I think you're right
@@noninvasive_rectal_probe8990 hi
I lost it at: "First of all: some losers lose all the time. Which is the side you occupy."
lol this comment is making me lose it
2:50
"Well... the thing is, like most things, it's complicated." 😂
@@CassTeaElle yeah yeah
well I could lift 50 lbs!
Most people: I've gained muscle.
Jordan Peterson: I've gained musculature
I've grown muscle fibers in response to a systematic challenge of my physical abilities*
To me that's something stupid people would say to sound smarter lol, just making the words bigger and more obscure
@@vinnieg6161 Jordan Peterson in a nutshell
@@blowfishfootman not really, when you're an author and an academic for more than 20 years your vocabulary becomes pretty perfect I imagine...
@@blowfishfootman your just mad he's smarter than you
So much work went into this. 🏆
I've always liked Jordan Peterson, but Peter Jordanson makes some VERY compelling arguments.
Yeah, I don't know what side to be on.
*Stands up abruptly* Pordan Jeterson is right!
+Lackey Shaysu
I think we might see the best debate history has ever seen if you got Dave Rubin and Jordan Peterson vs Rave Dubin and Peter Jordanson in one room.
@@briddenattech I uhhGREE
😂😂😂😂😂😂
"Yeah yeah. All the women are rejecting you?"
"... ... ... right."
ITS YOU
His shadow is a brownshirt, man...... For real.....
“My gums are in perfect shape. Right there, something impressive to behold”
Truly impressive. Roughly speaking.
lol reminds me of Dennis from It's Always Sunny
Well it depends on what you mean by “impressive” you know it’s complicated like all things
This is actually one of the more sane conversations I've heard lately. Well done.
Peter Jordanson: "Brilliant Book."
Also Peter Jordanson: "Poorly written."
I feel like this when it comes to Naruto or most other big name anime/manga.
It's sarcasm
It was a brilliant book! (Although it was poorly written)
What makes you think you just don't hate the succesful?
This conversation is exactly his situation
Jordan Peterson OWNS and HUMILIATES Jeter Pordanson with facts and logic
Ben Shapiro and Jordan Perterson intellectually GENOCIDES their OPPONENTS and basically you're fucking stupid
dont forget KID
The Immovable Object VS. The Unstoppable Force
More like the unstoppable object versus the immovable force
Playing world of warcraft much?
Film Buff 92
more like? what the fuck are you talking about that’s exactly how it doesn’t go you imbecilic idiot fuck. It was right in the original comment it didn’t need your dumbass backwards response.
@@DylanZapf-dm4mh it's called a joke
@@scriabinismydog2439 He's fun at parties
This is still a better conversation than most other podcasts.
"All the women are rejecting you? "
"..... right "
It's you
Thats the side I occupy
so its' YOU
Saw this and then he said it
That's my favorite part, starting with the side of the losers comment. It works REALLY well.
My heart is with the poor men whose wives have been finessed by Peter Jordanson.
leo arnstein Peter Jordansons motto: Lay down curved with your back arched
it puts a different context behind his famous quote "attack! like this: with your foot out"
Imo that was Jordan Peterson
when your girl smell like lobster you know the jordanson has visited.
"If I hit a woman-- I mean REALLY hit her-- I could do some serious damage!"
_-Jordan Peterson_
This needs Roe Jogan in the background saying...
"Yeah"
"Thats crazy man"
"How dare you!"
Jamie pull that shit up
Ever heard of DMT?
I read it with his voice
"A buddy of mine....."
This was amazing - i need more of this series.
Dude this is next level. I'm literally in tears.
In order to go even more next level...
Joey Diaz Meets Joey Diaz
Joey Diaz meets Doey Jiaz
This guy gets it Hahaha
"Your persona doesn't shout intellectual."
"Screw you!"
This is amazing and i haven't found anything that's consistently funny for a long time
And he even matched their outfits the whole time. I can't believe how much of a coincidence it must've been, but to spot it and make it this good, this is really art.
"Compare yourself to who someone else is today" Brilliant, Brilliant
Just to clarify, I'm on the side of Peter Jordanson, Jordan Peterson is a sham
That's not so good.
@Dylan [Smith] Nah most people aren't equipped to actually engage with the alt-right. Not saying they're intellectual powerhouses or anything, but they've been practicing their bullshit points in the mirror for years so they can at least present themselves as being knowledgeable. Most people don't know the real facts by heart and can't fact check their false claims on the spot. And by going into the dirty details of most of their points is just going to make it look like you're doing mental gymnastics to the average person, while speaking in simple platitudes like the alt-right does is going to appeal to young teens and people who identify as centrists. That and a myriad of other argumentative tricks and a lot of people will find themselves on the losing side of a debate with an alt-righter. They're extremely intellectually dishonest and are perfectly happy to bubble under the surface of youth culture while people like you reinforce the idea that they themselves want to push: that they aren't a big deal. You can find posts in ar discords and forums about "hiding your power level" and defaulting to "im joking" and "im memeing" as a defense so they can always claim plausible deniability. And this is effective af. The AR are the ones who turned the "ok" hand sign into a white power symbol just by agreeing to meme it into one, the AR made everyone talk about their "it's okay to be white campaign" and very few people who talk about it even mention the AR origin of the phrase and just focus on the content of the phrase while ignoring the intentions. I'm not saying the AR is the biggest problem the country's facing today, far from it, but they aren't to be underestimated. Especially when we're talking about the effect they've been having on the youth.
@@Michael-wo4wc Alright I’m not sure if you're memeing or not because these are textbook alt-right talking points. I didn't appreciate your attempt to reframe the conversation to get me to defend a strawman I strongly don't believe in: that other identity groups aren't as toxic as the alt-right. They are. But the conversation topic is about the alt-right. Groups like Hotep and ISIS are just as toxic to the young minds of their targets as well. They're also much less effective at branding as the alt-right is, which was again, the topic of the conversation: the alt-right's ability to brand. So stop trying to reframe the topic to anything but the alt-right.
Instead of going with my initial inclination that you're either an alt-right sympathizer with good intentions at best or an alt-righter badly attempting to hide their power level at worst, I’m going to do for you what you wouldn't do for me and assume you have no horse in the race for one side or the other. I’m not going to play the minority victim game in the same way that you tried to play the white victim game. I'm going to assume that you, like me, just want to get to the bottom of what’s real. So let's get to it.
*The Inevitability of Identity Politics In A Multiracial Society*
I agree with this assertion in the same way that I agree there would be a lot less theft if we removed everyone's hands. Of course in order to have Identity Politics related to race in a society, there needs to be multiple races or at least the perception of multiple races. However, even in a single racial society, identity politics will still exist. There will still be men and women, gays and straights, atheists and theists, cis and trans, democrats and republicans, older generations and younger generations. Even without race all of these identity dividers will exist. It's not sad, it's just reality.
*The Alt-Right Makes You Sad, But What Makes Me Sad Is The Thousands Of White Cities That Turned Black Or Brown And Are Now Unsafe Shells Of Their Former Glory*
This is a baseless claim that I’m not going to accept without any proof. Proof I doubt you're willing to provide, because it's gonna take a lot more than a single link to objectively prove this statement. You're only using this to virtue signal and try and claim a moral high ground over me. Are we interested in what's real or what you believe? Abandon this point unless you have the facts and data to back it up, without that it's baseless propaganda.
*America Has A Drastic Difference In IQ and Crime Rate In Regards To Whites, Browns, and Blacks, With IQ Starting At The Top For Whites And Scaling Down Through Browns To Blacks, While Crime Rate Scales Down At Whites And Increases from Browns To Blacks*
So your logic is that race and IQ are clearly linked with a propensity to commit crime. You’ve linked together all of this stuff as being related, but you missed one crucial factor: wealth. According to your list, wealth also scales with it being the highest for whites, medium for “browns” (from henceforth, “browns” is gonna refer to Hispanic), and is the lowest for blacks. People who live in poverty often can only access homes with abnormal amounts of lead in them in the paint or in the water. Intake of lead at an early age is indicative of a propensity toward violence later in life, and a lower IQ. Not to mention, pregnant mothers ingest and breathe in the lead, and this combined with other poor prenatal care practices linked with poverty such as poor nutrition results in a lower IQ. One of the best ways to raise your IQ is by education, but if you're living in a poor community the schools in your district are highly likely to be shitty and underfunded, particularly in regards to after school programs, which keep kids and teens from getting involved in crime or from becoming single parents. You can't fuck Tammy if you're at soccer practice. If you're going to class hungry everyday, you’re not getting the most out of an already sub par education and you're much more likely to make bad decisions. This cycle repeats itself just as violently on the kids of people in these situations due to generational wealth. There are plenty of studies that show that economic mobility is dependent on the economic standing of your parents. Chance are if you're born rich, you stay rich, chances are if you're born poor, you stay poor. Tracing the lineage of your average black American today back to just their grandparents has them living in Jim Crow era, redlining era, separate but equal era. They weren't living in times in which getting a strong foothold on the economy was viable for most blacks, and generational wealth is now reflected in the current black population. We can mitigate this by addressing the problem and getting the government involved to reverse the trends. We saw this happen in the 60s and the number of black Americans making enough to be considered middle class has doubled to almost 50% since then. In other words, poverty is much more indicative of your IQ than race is, and poverty is also more indicative of your propensity to commit crime. A dumbfuck low IQ Rockefeller isn't gonna grow up and decide to rob a liquor store because he's just that stupid, but even the brightest high IQ black kid living in a fucked up environment is gonna have to take a drink of water at some point, and he's gonna be surrounded by adults and his peers who’re doing shady shit.
Inb4 the twin studies meme: don't say it, link it. Not an article about it, link the study itself. But my point for this has already been stated: poor prenatal care can cause you to have a lower IQ.
Also P.S: look up the median age of your average white person, hispanic person, and black person. White people have less young people among their populations while hispanics and blacks have more. When you control for age, the crime rates become a lot more similar (the difference disappears between hispanics and whites) because young people are more likely to commit crime than older people.
*There Are Studies The Show Neighbors Are More Mistrustful Of Each Other In Multiracial Societies*
Accepting this to be true without digging any deeper into logical questions like “where were these studies conducted, in what manner, and by whom,” I’m not surprised. This is called consciousness of kind, it is a mental appendix in that it is an evolutionary brain tick that fools you into arbitrarily identifying with people that look like you. It usually doesn't last past the first conversation you have with someone, because at that point if they look like you and they're a douche, you’ll cease to identify with them. But if they look nothing like you and you find common ground, you will begin to identify with them. This isn't something to succumb to, it's something to rise above like kids who are afraid of the monsters in their closet. Merely fear of the unknown we are perfectly capable of rising against but only if we acknowledge that the feelings of togetherness we feel when we see a stranger that looks like us isn't real. To remind you of this: the grand majority of people who are murdered in America are murdered by someone of their own race.
Another point to make here is that interaction leads to trust, you are unlikely to trust someone you've never interacted with. Social gatherings between neighbors have been declining ever since the television came about, so this “mistrust” between neighbors can almost certainly be applied to the fact that many people probably don't know their neighbors.
@@Michael-wo4wc *But Guess What Group Of All Is Least Tribal? Whites*
This is pure opinion, pure speculation, and you're gonna have to give me some hard data if you wanna back it up. Otherwise I’m dismissing it as a feeling you have because it 100% *is* just a feeling you pulled out of your ass. We're not interested in your feelings, we're interested in what’s real.
*The Alt-Right Is Just One Pro-White Political Movement Meanwhile There Are Thousands Of Hispanic, Black, Jewish, And Asian Groups; But You Don't Attack Them*
There goes the reframing again. You don't know what I attack, but if you reframe it this way it makes white people into a victim. Nice attempt at the victim game, but it's ultimately futile. The Alt-Right isn't just a pro-white movement, it's a pro-white anti-everyone else movement. And it isn't the only one of its kind. That's also besides the point, because the Alt-Right itself isn't so much the issue, but its that their ideas very slyly seep into the minds of unsuspecting ignorant people like yourself, and as you go on to innocently parrot their talking points, you normalize their views and shift the Overton window further and further toward objectively fascist concepts. You can do all of this without ever identifying as Alt-Right and believing yourself to be the least racist person on Earth.
Now, to address the thousands of other identitarian groups: name me ten from each racial group you’ve listed since there are thousands of them and the tangible effect they've had on society and political discourse that is equivalent to the Alt-Right’s in the past decade and maybe I’ll start worrying about them too. For now, I’m more concerned about an ideologically subversive group that targets people who are a part of the largest ethnic group in the country that holds the most seats in the house, the senate, the supreme court, and the president’s cabinet.
*Left’s Cultural Marxist Anti-White Villainization. Everything Wrong In The World? White Man’s Fault*
This is the part that makes me think you're not serious. I love the cultural marxism meme. You do know that empty phrase was coined by fear mongerers that would go on to form the actual nazi party, right? Whatever. Can you just explain to me what cultural marxism means to you?
Also, I love the complete rational disconnect in the Alt-Right's logic. You say they're more on the side of truth than I wanna admit? Okay. Well the Alt-Right loves to take credit for making the world the way it is today, that Western Society rose and saved the world from our savage selves. And that this was all thanks to white men, because all the other races don't have high enough IQs, they're too stupid and violent to have any impact on the world outside of destroying themselves and others. Yet the Alt-Right cries whenever white men get blamed for any negative aspect of the current state of the world they themselves are always trying to take credit for shaping. I don't understand. The majority of extremely powerful national superpowers for the last two centuries have had white leaders. Pretty much every policy in existence in America right now was put into effect by a majority of whites. White people make up the majority of “western nations.” The Alt-Right loves to tell other races to get their shit together and accept responsibility for their actions, but they never wanna do the same for the evils of white history and they individually aren't even responsible for any of it, there shouldn't be any reason to deny it but they do. Because that's how deep their whiteness is attached to their sense of identity. They don't even wanna acknowledge that poor innocent freedom loving whites could've ever done anything wrong in the past. The Alt-Right isn't on the side of truth, they're on the side of whatever makes white people look best and everyone else look worse. And they'll present whatever half truths they have to you so you can repeat their surface level fool’s talking points like a machine gun, which forces someone like me to write an essay to debunk it all. But because most people are fools, they're gonna come away with the foolish talking point without doing any research of their own or engaging with any of the nuance of what they're saying.
*If You Want To End Identity Politics And Promote Individualism, Start With Black Women Who Vote Like 99% In Unison While Attacking The Most Freedom Loving Group Of White Men*
Okay so, I never said I wanted to end identity politics. Mostly because I don't think it's possible as I stated earlier. I wanna mitigate it by debunking victim narrative bullshit like this. Black women vote 99% in unison on what issues in what states? I’m having a hard time believing black women in California feel the same way about gay marriage as black women in Alabama. If you're just talking about party lines, have you ever considered that one party over the other has stronger policies that favor the plight of many black women (like birth control initiatives, education, police brutality, healthcare) while the other party doesn't. I just love the framing here: 99% of black women are a hive mind and the poor innocent freedom loving white males are having their freedom loving ideas attacked. As if the hive mind of black women doesn't love freedom and isn't actively trying to increase their own level of freedom via the policies they support. “Freedom” is a vague virtue that's easy to spit out and virtue signal with, but it's more complicated than that. Sure I’m free to buy a Maserati and drive it down the freeway with the top down but only if I have the economic ability to do so. Your level of “Freedom” in this world is dictated entirely by class and your economic standing. So it doesn't surprise me that a minority of the poorest people in the country progressively fighting to increase their own individual economic freedoms might come into ideological contention with the majority of the wealthiest people in the country fighting to conserve a system that’s already benefits them and gives them more freedoms than others whether they realize it or not. So it doesn't surprise me that the poor freedom loving white men might feel so attacked when black women bring their grievances to the marketplace of ideas. Naturally if it ain't broke, don't fix it, so any progressive ideas echoed by black women around the country are just going to be considered an attack on whiteness by privileged white men. Especially when you throw some good ol’ fashioned fear mongering in like “thousands of white cities have gone to shit because of the blacks and the browns” and tell them everything they wanna hear, like that they're the most virtuous, non-tribal, peaceful, freedom loving people on Earth.
I don't mean to come off as harsh and rude to you, because I really don't wanna perpetuate your victim narrative. But I hope that after reading all this shit, you come away at least questioning the legitimacy of what you've heard and seen from the AR and AR sympathizers and useful idiots for the AR that may not be affiliated, but are even more effective at getting their ideas to spread than an actual self identified member. If you haven't actually looked into a talking point, don't bring it up here at the digital water-cooler just so you have something to say and a victim narrative to feel nice and victimized by.
This remains one of the funniest damn things I've ever seen. Holy cow. I'm crying and my abs hurt. Bloody brilliant. :*D
"All the women are rejecting you."
(Sinister smile)
..silence
"Yea."
(Broken)
..this is a masterpiece.
3:00
@S billings That's called being gay
Seeing Jordan Peterson out of context, acting like he is and talking about having 4 affairs with intelligent, beautiful women to himself is truly amazing and holy crap this is better than most movies
Loool
Have your 1000th like sir
Watch Being John Malkovich. It gets weird.
"It's like 'cool,' ya know?"
My two brain cells arguing before waking up
3:48
2:46
😂😂👌🏽
Gold 😂
@@Shtf132 this has happened to me every day the last 2 weeks. Racing thoughts
I love Dr. Peterson, and this is a work of art.
sounds like an AI having a conversation with another AI
Because it kinda is
He's calling Peterson an npc
Yeah, I don't know what they're talking about lol.
Am I alive?
Sounds like an AI talking to itself
Jordan Peterson: _outstanding move_
Peter Jordanson: _outstanding move_
movestanding out
outmoving stand
stand movingout
moved outstandingly
@@alexeydenisov1863 IS THAT A JOJO REFERENCE?
PLEASE SOMEONE MAKE HIM WATCH THIS
@Joaquín Jiménez where is his video reaction lol
@Joaquín Jiménez Thank you, you beautiful being!
That's the video and it's not on his channel, it's here on Shamien
ua-cam.com/video/TZ6H3AZGnTo/v-deo.html
Thats not reaction its barely anecdotal
@@DaedricGamingHD Yeah but the original comment was about making him watch the video when he already did
Ye but the way the comments are strucktured lead me to belive he actully reacted to the vid rather than asked once by a i'm guessing jornalist
LOL thanks for the laughs I subbed as you helped me feel good.
I lost it when he called himself "kid"
I hope you find "it" again soon, my friend.
Hope you find it! GOOD Luck!
Godspeed you find it soon.
Have you found it yet?
It's cool if you didn't find it yet after two months. Keep searching!
There is a kind of weird genius in this. The people making these kinds of videos have revolutionized the genre of montage, and they (this guy, for example) have a particular talent for it that nobody knew existed before now.
Yeah its called hours of boredom
There are other people that can do that. some of them aren't very good though.
ua-cam.com/users/Abu5ernamevideos
ua-cam.com/video/onkLFOKyhXQ/v-deo.html
Not true! Plenty of people do this!
@@SylasTheGreat It's the quality, not the quantity.
@Ezra Milos That's what the doctor said when your mother was impressed when you were born
When a forcible move meets an objectionable stoppage.
For the win, best comment of 2019 so far!
Yo I fucking CRIED at this comment 😂😂
I haven't laughed so hard in a while 😂 thank you
To the person who made this... I absolutely love you.
Ha dude it's made so well
@Ty Thomas Boxing Training Guess what, I've had three affairs in the last years and they've all been successful, I haven't got caught.
@@RadioactiveSand im a good guy
Someone should show it to JP
Straight to the top of the UA-cam dominance hierarchy.
Tyson Mohr A true alpha male red pill gamer video
Next level comment ths
Won't matter until it's at the top of all possible dominance hierarchies
Due to competence though, not power. Remember this.
@@donrogers7227 Exactly man. Exactly
Jordan Peterson must react to this.
ua-cam.com/video/TZ6H3AZGnTo/v-deo.html
And tell us how it relates to a mythical story
@@mortyk182 ope, whaddaya know.
Meme review
Morteza MIM Thank you for sharing that I wanted to see his reaction as well
How have I only just stumbled across this absolute gem of a funny. Ive got tears rolling down my face. 😂😂😂
Jordan Peterson is so smart that he can out-talk even himself.
Jordan Peterson D E S T R O Y S Peter Jordanson
At the same time he's also so bad he loses an argument with himself...
@@warbler1984 He is the glass
Congratulations, you played yourself
or he's so stupid that he loses even to himself....
"Some losers lose all the time, which is the side you ocupate..."
Fantastic line
I will use this quote on someone before I die.
I accidentally read lobsters instead of losers.
@@elgatocapibara lobsters lose to humans all the time. So... still fits.
@@zasta7 not for long...
@@jmb8989 good idea🗿
Jordan Peterson
- Successful book writer
- Great with women
- Works out
- Considered a genius
- Plays the game
Peter Jordanson
- Loser
- Rejected by women
- In bad shape
- Not considered an intellectual
- Doesn’t play the game
Who's side are you on?
Pordan Jeterson
Jeter Pordanson
Chad Peterson vs Virgin Jordanson
You forgot the most impressive feat of Jordan Peterson. The man has gums in perfect shape!
U forgot that the first one have coronavirus
That’s one of the most brilliant things I’ve ever seen. Peterson is such the perfect character to use for this mock-up. I was crying, I was laughing so hard.
Did anyone else notice that these two look really similar?
They even have very similar voices!! Almosr identical!!
Wtf no they look completely different from each other
your just racist and think all white people look the same
Right? I thought I was the only lobster that noticed
Ik that's why I'm calling fake.
This Fight Club sequel looks awesome
“Tough luck for me, but i could lift 50 pounds”
“No.. i don’t think so”
MASTERFUL
That's just too much Hahahaha
Dying here
@@gerardo49078 NO ITS NOT
I'm following Peter Jordansen from now on . Subbed .