Anyone else watch so many of these that you hear Eric's voice in your games? "I think I'm spoiled for choice here." "I do need to be careful." "I think there's a tricky line here." "I do need to be mindful of my time."
Eric, I've been watching your channel for years now, and more than any other streamer, the work you've put into chess shows. I don't know if it was gimmick at first, but the manner in which you analyze games as you play them, it's like you've reached a whole other level of thinking.
Love Eric and his content, but if you like these speedrun games and master level analysis, you should check out Danya(Daniel Naroditsky), he has a lot more speedruns and he's a brilliant coach, if you like Eric you'll love him too
That second endgame was so tense, I really like how these games always feel so relatable and natural, especially at this level where the play can be quite decent but then you get down to 30 seconds and show us all why you’re the IM making the speed run and we’re the audience. Bravo Eric, keep up the great work
Its awesome how some of these opponents put up these good fights. Must feel awesome to go toe to toe with Eric Rosen and hold your own as a 1700 rated player
@@wsemenske yeah some people just need their time and have bad intuition. I'm not a 1700, but almost everyone can crumble under pressure and once you made the first blunder they just keep rolling in
@@wsemenske suggesting the first guy was cheating is crazy, when they had a bunch of time they missed a few winning moves, and made a couple of errors, there's no way they were cheating lol, 1800s are just actually somewhat decent at chess
@@wsemenske, not weird. What's weird is that you don't seem to understand that people need time to think. Especially, when they lack experience. Playing with low time is a different skill. Also, who's silly enough to cheat at chess but stays at 1700 ELO? Stupid and baseless claims about cheating only make the problematic situation worse.
32:05 As a 1650 elo player, I feel very proud of myself for finding Ra6. I am less proud of the fact that I had to scroll up the page to read the field a6 of the table, instead of knowing it by heart :(
After many years without playing chess I had a chance game with a friend which re-awakened my interest. Wanting to improve led me to your speed run series which has been so instructional and TOTALLY INSPIRING for me and I'm sure for many other. Now a keen follower of your streams and video releases - keep up the great content. Loving the great chess journey once again.....
The games have definitely been getting more complicated in the last few episodes. Rosen is now into territory where I would get eaten alive, I expect, but I can learn a lot from these games. Remarkable how flat the eval was in game 1 for nearly the whole game. There have also been real time pressures in a few recent games. Rosen will have to be more careful with the time, even if it means explaining more of his thinking during the review instead of during the game.
at 46:18 you're talking about how deep you are in the tactical line and i wanna promote this where here to learn after all and its just like you said how dangerous some position can be if your not carefull keep up the good work :)
@@tvens1 depends on opponent's move, but I would expect to take the rook or pawn.. it looks like this is winning some material and not getting in bad position at the same time..
Phew! These 1600-1700 players seem bloody tough. I've been thinking of biting the bullet and starting to play online myself, but it looks a lot harder out there than I thought.
It's also nice to note that while they are tough, Eric is handicapping himself by taking time to explain the moves and not playing his main openings, so in reality you'll have better chances of holding your own when you play
at clip 31:54, Moves played Qe2 but if White Queen moves to b3 will it be better? 1> Qb3, [all moves other than Kf7] , Ne7, Qxe6 2> Qb3, [if black king moves to f7], Qb7, Qxa1 3> Qb3, Qb7.... Nc7 [black King h7 or h8] When white queen secure b7, black probably would like to pair the rook [unfortunately bishop had no good squares] White Queen b7, IF Bb6 [blunder after Nxb6, axb6, Rxa8 ] Bishop g5/h4 will be hunted by pawns
Toward the end of the video it was beneficial to take us through the longer engine line when the mate was a real possibility. You do great with your analysis, finding the balance between explaining something a human might go for and avoiding several lengthy obscure lines that a "super" GM likely wouldn't find! maybe a few mins
At 39:04 I was proud to spot Queen d5, "forking" both rooks and the Queen and thus forcing the exchange of Queens, and Black doesn't have the time to take the knight on b4. Then you have a pretty chill, although admittedly quite positional queenless endgame being two pawns up.
16:12 you mention you dont want to trade queens, but you may have missed the fork! Qb4 Qxb4 Rxb4 Nd3 and black wins back the exchange, up a pawn and -1.0
Thank you for saying the name and rating of your opponents as I requested. It is helpful. I will add that I much prefer your games versus players rated over 1700 since those are the ones that give me the most problems and who I face most often. Good to see that they even give you a good challenge too. But unlike you, I usually lose to them (especially those over 1800). With your guidance I think my score against those players will improve.
Manage your time, you're getting waayyyyyy toooo closer losing because of time. Gotta keep the win streak alive to master, who would of thought undefeated is prime entertainment now on these! Keep it going! We're all rooting for ya!
> Engine supports Rxd6. Probably, but with this layout, we viewers do not see the engine analysis you are looking at. So I had to use my local chess program to analyze. By the way, 25...Be6 is bad, but instead of 26. Ba4 the white could play 26. Ndxe4! (dxe4 27.d5). Also, the bar jump after 32.Qd2 is not due to 32...Nd3 (as I thought while watching) but due to 32...N6h4 preparing Re6.
Ciao Eric. The guy from superspeed who you played some time back swears by the italian gambit to the extent that when engins play that opening white always wins (according to him). Do you agree with this? Immediate d4 instead of c3 first. Thanks for the content.
Hello everybody i just noticed that at 21:52 the eval bar shifts somewhat in favor of black and after analyses it's -1,4 and the move to play after Qd2 is N6h5 instead of Ne6 not saying it would be easy findable but definitly interesting PGN: [Variant "From Position"] [FEN "3rr1k1/1pq2pp1/p2N1n1p/P1Pp4/1P1Ppn2/1B5P/Q4PP1/3RR1K1 b - - 0 1"] 1... Rxd6 2. cxd6 Qxd6 3. Qd2 N6h5
At 3:35 am i mistaken or arent you winning a pawn after b5 and after a4xb5 a6xb5 if the bishop takes then you can sack the dark square bishop and win the rook? I dont know if anyones gonna see this just thought it was a cool idea😁
It's always a pleasure to watch those games. Opponents are roughly my level so I find those games very helpful too. Somehow it's reassuring to watch mister Rosen having a tiny bit of trouble against 1600-ish opponents. If someone plays solid, there's not much we can do, right ? A big takeaway for me is : no italian for me. Noooo sir, no no no. ( I love my 1.e4 though ). Thanks, and have a good day everyone.
A wonderful instruction! I am learning a lot just by hearing your thoughts. Thanks a lot! Needless to say: I have been at the edge of my seat for the last couple of episodes. Signed: "ELO in the low 500s".
Eric could you consider switching to 15+10 games now that you're higher elo? Or maybe 10+5 but either way time is less of a concern and opponents don't just time out
Perhaps I’m confused by the pre moves, but at the very end of the second game, with your Queen on F7, protected by a pawn on E6, you move the pawn to E7, leaving the Queen undefended. Couldn’t Black have taken the Queen instead of moving to H8?
This second game shows a typical psychological mistake of playing quickly and trying to win on time, when you have a lot of time and your opponent does not. By playing quickly and trying to flag him you are throwing that advantage out of the window.
The idea is that you have to manage your time before it comes to an end. It's just harsher conditions. You don't question 5 min versus 10 min time controls, right? So, with +0 you just get less time overall.
@@a_wild_Kirillian You don't know how long the game is going to last. You can only manage your time over a fixed set of moves. Not over an open-ended set of moves. It's crazy.
@@RAFAELSILVA-by6dy , you only have to keep your time in level with the opponent. And you don't have to know how many moves the game will be if you never spend unnecessary amounts of time on finding the best moves. You have to optimize and sacrifice to manage the risk of less predictable game length. That's just a different style of play. And it's not really open-ended: you can reliably count on the game ending in 60 moves with like the first 10 moves of the opening when you don't really think. And for most rankings that'll be 30-40. In 5+0 min blitz that gives you 15 seconds for one move on average (your time + your opponent's time). It's a focus on the overall consistent efficiency. Less forgiving than increment. If you promote a queen in the endgame and lose on time, it's not the problem of the time control not giving you increment to accomplish your win there. It's the problem of you not being fast and accurate enough throughout the whole game to eventually beat your opponent in this case. Yes, you can't predict the future and know exactly how much time you need to spend. And that's just what you learn to deal with. You only need to be better than your opponent in the current game.
EDIT: Deleted my incorrect comment. I was fooled by watching the premove at 42.01 and thinking it was an actual move made in response to Kg7. Guess I need to be more attentive to what is going on at these speeds! D'oh! 🤣 Kudos to Eric. This is an epic series, but is costing me sleep!! 😁
Anyone else watch so many of these that you hear Eric's voice in your games?
"I think I'm spoiled for choice here."
"I do need to be careful."
"I think there's a tricky line here."
"I do need to be mindful of my time."
Absolutely! LOL! I find myself actually speaking out loud. My wife keeps asking “who are you talking to?”
We could make a bingo card out of them lol
@@frightenedsoul It's fun to mentally check them off.
A couple more:
"I think I'm happy to _____"
"Ok, my opponent is taking some time."
@@James-ts8tc “ I should note that _____”
“I think there’s a lot of compensation”
@@James-ts8tcwhat other ones can u think of 😂
Eric, I've been watching your channel for years now, and more than any other streamer, the work you've put into chess shows. I don't know if it was gimmick at first, but the manner in which you analyze games as you play them, it's like you've reached a whole other level of thinking.
Love Eric and his content, but if you like these speedrun games and master level analysis, you should check out Danya(Daniel Naroditsky), he has a lot more speedruns and he's a brilliant coach, if you like Eric you'll love him too
Crazy title Eric
Hints of Sly Stallone's early days...
mamma mia, my-a queen! 🤌
Redundant title
@quazzydiscman sly stallone 💀💀
Italians are crazy; 🤭
That second endgame was so tense, I really like how these games always feel so relatable and natural, especially at this level where the play can be quite decent but then you get down to 30 seconds and show us all why you’re the IM making the speed run and we’re the audience. Bravo Eric, keep up the great work
Congrats on 140+ win streak! Those last 2 games were CLOSE! This series just gets better and better.
11:40 that moment when you play a move and instantly realize that it's a blunder 😅
👍🏽
Its awesome how some of these opponents put up these good fights. Must feel awesome to go toe to toe with Eric Rosen and hold your own as a 1700 rated player
They put up insane moves, but can't make any moves once lower than 30 sec, weird...
@@wsemenske yeah some people just need their time and have bad intuition. I'm not a 1700, but almost everyone can crumble under pressure and once you made the first blunder they just keep rolling in
@@wsemenske exactly my thoughts
@@wsemenske suggesting the first guy was cheating is crazy, when they had a bunch of time they missed a few winning moves, and made a couple of errors, there's no way they were cheating lol, 1800s are just actually somewhat decent at chess
@@wsemenske, not weird. What's weird is that you don't seem to understand that people need time to think. Especially, when they lack experience. Playing with low time is a different skill. Also, who's silly enough to cheat at chess but stays at 1700 ELO? Stupid and baseless claims about cheating only make the problematic situation worse.
as an italian with extremely high intensity when I watch eric, I approve of this title
If my Italian friends are any indication, the qualifier "when I watch Eric" doesn't belong in that sentence
tbf everyone is intense compared to Eric :D
I really appreciate how you explain things clearly and calmly.thank you.
Eric you're a gift that just keeps on giving, thank you very much for all your hard work, I appreciate it tremendously. 🔥🔥🔥
11:40 As a 1000 elo player, I feel very proud of myself for noticing that blunder before Eric.
Yeah, I get it. There is a problem, though: it's much easier to judge the board correctly when you're not playing yourself.
@@a_wild_KirillianWhy you think this is?
@@al87221 You serious?
32:05 As a 1650 elo player, I feel very proud of myself for finding Ra6.
I am less proud of the fact that I had to scroll up the page to read the field a6 of the table, instead of knowing it by heart :(
Great photo with those giant trophies and a tiny you standing in front haha.
After many years without playing chess I had a chance game with a friend which re-awakened my interest. Wanting to improve led me to your speed run series which has been so instructional and TOTALLY INSPIRING for me and I'm sure for many other. Now a keen follower of your streams and video releases - keep up the great content. Loving the great chess journey once again.....
WOW… Great game..! I love how composed and patient you are. Waiting for the perfect time to strike, whether 5:00 on the clock or 9 seconds… Amazing..!
I really appreciate your attitude and positivity when you play.
Damn, I am just in awe of how well you play under pressure. Less than 20 seconds to go and you just ripped that last opponent apart. Super impressive.
I'm Italian. I've lived in basements, attics but never intense.
😮💨
very nice
but maybe you did. in the past?
The games have definitely been getting more complicated in the last few episodes. Rosen is now into territory where I would get eaten alive, I expect, but I can learn a lot from these games. Remarkable how flat the eval was in game 1 for nearly the whole game. There have also been real time pressures in a few recent games. Rosen will have to be more careful with the time, even if it means explaining more of his thinking during the review instead of during the game.
I like how you don't rush your moves when you're down in time and still win, I tend to almost run out of time when that happens.
The series is getting more and more exciting. Thanks Eric for the informative commentry
I vary between 1650-1750 and it feels good to watch these guys battle you hard. Gives me hope that someday I could get to the 2000’s
with the time pressure, eric could still see the blunders/make tactics to win material wow
thank you for the daily uploads eric 🙏🙏 winding down at the end of the day watching your videos is awesome ❤
at 46:18 you're talking about how deep you are in the tactical line and i wanna promote this where here to learn after all and its just like you said how dangerous some position can be if your not carefull keep up the good work :)
Holy moly that second game was crazy cliffhanger. I didn't think you were going to pull that off. Incredible.
13:50 wasn't ND3 good move, forking rook and a pawn? Or am I missing something? :)
@@tvens1 depends on opponent's move, but I would expect to take the rook or pawn.. it looks like this is winning some material and not getting in bad position at the same time..
Incredible games. Middle games and end games like that are why chess is so fun to watch and play
Phew! These 1600-1700 players seem bloody tough. I've been thinking of biting the bullet and starting to play online myself, but it looks a lot harder out there than I thought.
It's also nice to note that while they are tough, Eric is handicapping himself by taking time to explain the moves and not playing his main openings, so in reality you'll have better chances of holding your own when you play
at clip 31:54, Moves played Qe2 but if White Queen moves to b3 will it be better?
1> Qb3, [all moves other than Kf7] , Ne7, Qxe6
2> Qb3, [if black king moves to f7], Qb7, Qxa1
3> Qb3, Qb7.... Nc7 [black King h7 or h8]
When white queen secure b7, black probably would like to pair the rook [unfortunately bishop had no good squares]
White Queen b7, IF Bb6 [blunder after Nxb6, axb6, Rxa8 ]
Bishop g5/h4 will be hunted by pawns
I’m patiently waiting on the pic update to the gigachad Eric which he used for his titled Tuesday vid today.
That is when he reaches 3500
@@joostvanrensyea that’s why I’m patiently waiting. I’d love for his speedrun account to surpass his actual account.
45:00 The post-mortem for game 2 neglects to mention why Qd7 was a game losing blunder by white
Thanks for this series of videos. Very enjoyable and instructive.
Toward the end of the video it was beneficial to take us through the longer engine line when the mate was a real possibility. You do great with your analysis, finding the balance between explaining something a human might go for and avoiding several lengthy obscure lines that a "super" GM likely wouldn't find!
maybe a few mins
At 39:04 I was proud to spot Queen d5, "forking" both rooks and the Queen and thus forcing the exchange of Queens, and Black doesn't have the time to take the knight on b4. Then you have a pretty chill, although admittedly quite positional queenless endgame being two pawns up.
Really grateful for this series.Thanks!
You know you’re a 90s baby if you wore long sleeve shirts that just said Basketball on them
I love watching your videos at bed time, it’s calming 😃
Great win that second game Eric
16:12 you mention you dont want to trade queens, but you may have missed the fork!
Qb4 Qxb4
Rxb4 Nd3 and black wins back the exchange, up a pawn and -1.0
always so happy to see another speedrun upload :)
Thank you for saying the name and rating of your opponents as I requested. It is helpful.
I will add that I much prefer your games versus players rated over 1700 since those are the ones that give me the most problems and who I face most often. Good to see that they even give you a good challenge too. But unlike you, I usually lose to them (especially those over 1800). With your guidance I think my score against those players will improve.
Manage your time, you're getting waayyyyyy toooo closer losing because of time. Gotta keep the win streak alive to master, who would of thought undefeated is prime entertainment now on these! Keep it going! We're all rooting for ya!
Amazing, thank you Eric!
at 40:36 after Qa6 what do you do after Rxa7?
> Engine supports Rxd6.
Probably, but with this layout, we viewers do not see the engine analysis you are looking at. So I had to use my local chess program to analyze.
By the way, 25...Be6 is bad, but instead of 26. Ba4 the white could play 26. Ndxe4! (dxe4 27.d5).
Also, the bar jump after 32.Qd2 is not due to 32...Nd3 (as I thought while watching) but due to 32...N6h4 preparing Re6.
@eric-rosen what percent of the ideas you gain during your game reviews, do you then utilize in future games?
Eric you are grandmaster for us, youtube fans :)
really nice videos, keep up the good work 😃
My favorite series
Great video again! Have you considered to make the search +-50 elo to make the opponents more consistent?
Bravo Eric !
This episode has reminded me to go from 700 elo to 1000 and just enjoy chess. I'm never dedicating time to get to this point. lol
10:49 Nxe4 would be a beautiful move for white, no?
Ciao Eric. The guy from superspeed who you played some time back swears by the italian gambit to the extent that when engins play that opening white always wins (according to him). Do you agree with this? Immediate d4 instead of c3 first. Thanks for the content.
Love the series
Hello everybody i just noticed that at 21:52 the eval bar shifts somewhat in favor of black and after analyses it's -1,4 and the move to play after Qd2 is N6h5 instead of Ne6 not saying it would be easy findable but definitly interesting
PGN:
[Variant "From Position"]
[FEN "3rr1k1/1pq2pp1/p2N1n1p/P1Pp4/1P1Ppn2/1B5P/Q4PP1/3RR1K1 b - - 0 1"]
1... Rxd6 2. cxd6 Qxd6 3. Qd2 N6h5
At 3:35 am i mistaken or arent you winning a pawn after b5 and after a4xb5 a6xb5 if the bishop takes then you can sack the dark square bishop and win the rook? I dont know if anyones gonna see this just thought it was a cool idea😁
Nevermind he said it 30 seconds later😂😂
At 14:20 could Nd3 have forked the rook and pawn?
It's always a pleasure to watch those games. Opponents are roughly my level so I find those games very helpful too.
Somehow it's reassuring to watch mister Rosen having a tiny bit of trouble against 1600-ish opponents. If someone plays solid, there's not much we can do, right ?
A big takeaway for me is : no italian for me. Noooo sir, no no no. ( I love my 1.e4 though ).
Thanks, and have a good day everyone.
A wonderful instruction! I am learning a lot just by hearing your thoughts. Thanks a lot! Needless to say: I have been at the edge of my seat for the last couple of episodes.
Signed: "ELO in the low 500s".
Eric could you consider switching to 15+10 games now that you're higher elo? Or maybe 10+5 but either way time is less of a concern and opponents don't just time out
Co-asks, promise we'll watch and you'll manage to continue explaining well while also comfortably converting against the 1800s going up
Perhaps I’m confused by the pre moves, but at the very end of the second game, with your Queen on F7, protected by a pawn on E6, you move the pawn to E7, leaving the Queen undefended. Couldn’t Black have taken the Queen instead of moving to H8?
Did I just hear Eric curse? hahahaha 19:20
8:20 d4 c4 Nd5 and you get outpost on on c3
What about white play h4 around 6:30min
This second game shows a typical psychological mistake of playing quickly and trying to win on time, when you have a lot of time and your opponent does not. By playing quickly and trying to flag him you are throwing that advantage out of the window.
i hope these never end
Well said 🙂↕️
Am I the only one who begins each episode by scrolling to the end to see if the win streak is still going? :D nice series!
yes
Mama mia, that was a spicy video!
I feel a bit sorry for these poor opponents who are sure they’re going to win on time. 😂
What an interesting episode. I think we might run into the first draw.
Ive only watched the first game but it was so nice, shame how it ended.
These were some exciting games!
those italians can be intense, especially if they pickpocket you :D
Thanks 🙏
What a great first game!
Thought this video was named after my grandpa's funeral where there was a brawl between his wife, ex wife, and their daughters
Thanks
This is the problem with chess without increment. I'll never understand the idea.
The idea is that you have to manage your time before it comes to an end. It's just harsher conditions. You don't question 5 min versus 10 min time controls, right? So, with +0 you just get less time overall.
@@a_wild_Kirillian also analog clocks with increment are a little tricky to make lol.
@@a_wild_Kirillian You don't know how long the game is going to last. You can only manage your time over a fixed set of moves. Not over an open-ended set of moves. It's crazy.
@@RAFAELSILVA-by6dy , you only have to keep your time in level with the opponent. And you don't have to know how many moves the game will be if you never spend unnecessary amounts of time on finding the best moves. You have to optimize and sacrifice to manage the risk of less predictable game length. That's just a different style of play.
And it's not really open-ended: you can reliably count on the game ending in 60 moves with like the first 10 moves of the opening when you don't really think. And for most rankings that'll be 30-40. In 5+0 min blitz that gives you 15 seconds for one move on average (your time + your opponent's time).
It's a focus on the overall consistent efficiency. Less forgiving than increment.
If you promote a queen in the endgame and lose on time, it's not the problem of the time control not giving you increment to accomplish your win there. It's the problem of you not being fast and accurate enough throughout the whole game to eventually beat your opponent in this case.
Yes, you can't predict the future and know exactly how much time you need to spend. And that's just what you learn to deal with. You only need to be better than your opponent in the current game.
Cool video bro
I see that pinewood derby award!
overpowering speedrun
at this point im just watching this to see profile pic updates
Could you play the Evan's gambit next time (in response to ...Bc5)
As an italian person, i feel really intensified
Two hard fought Italians? 🪠👨🔧🟥🪠👨🔧🟩
very good. :D :D
heart rate monitor this time?? :D :D
Mental ❤❤
Interesting opponents.
More love from India you and vishy are my favourite
EDIT: Deleted my incorrect comment. I was fooled by watching the premove at 42.01 and thinking it was an actual move made in response to Kg7. Guess I need to be more attentive to what is going on at these speeds! D'oh! 🤣
Kudos to Eric.
This is an epic series, but is costing me sleep!! 😁
King is forced to h8 after Qf7+ so no Kxf7 there
@@TheSlogan78 thanks for putting me right! I edited out my mistaken comment. 👍
Can you get a fake Mario moustache that you can wear when you play the Italian? But not in a racist way, because Mario is a good guy.
Sweet games
Here, have a trophy! 🏆
Well done! Probably just need to pay a bit more attention to your time during the middle game.
14:02, why not knight to D3 ?
Eric is a fearless counter attacker, he just need to improve his pure attacking skills.
Always moooooore
Chess is so cool cos it litterally jus a board game u can make a livimg off of ( if ur good ha)
Sometimes I like the video before having watched it 😅
Perfect just in time for bed 😊