TOP CUSTOM CARDS OF THE WEEK #7 - Some Crazy Hero Cards | Card Review | Hearthstone

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 429

  • @daniellim6034
    @daniellim6034 6 років тому +585

    Plot Twist: The wrong Hemet was intentional to generate more comments about said wrong Hemet.

  • @TheMajorStranger
    @TheMajorStranger 6 років тому +506

    10:05 wrong Hemet editor, He's talking about 5 mana 6/3 battlecry: destroy a beast from Goblins and Gnomes

    • @Wotplaya4
      @Wotplaya4 6 років тому +14

      GvG really? Poor hemet... he's actually from the classic set

    • @cjandaa1
      @cjandaa1 6 років тому +129

      CalvinAz no he's not

    • @TheMajorStranger
      @TheMajorStranger 6 років тому +18

      Nope, google it bro, That's why he's not played while right now otherwise Taunt Druid and Beast hunter wouldn't be the most played right now.

    • @Wotplaya4
      @Wotplaya4 6 років тому +32

      TheMajorStranger oh wtf you're right... feels weird tho... since he was one of the tutorial bosses... and I guess it's been a while lol

    • @m.rachman1288
      @m.rachman1288 6 років тому +6

      nope it is gvg

  • @jamesteavery0
    @jamesteavery0 6 років тому +146

    Greater polymorph would make adventures pretty easy.

    • @Parallaces
      @Parallaces 6 років тому +57

      It would obviously fail on them, just like sideshow spelleater and alexstraza.

  • @drumlineking07
    @drumlineking07 6 років тому +35

    I think Golden Retriever could work if instead it said "Discover a golden copy of a card in your deck"
    Alternatively, it could be from your opponent's deck or maybe a combination of cards from both decks.

  • @haenno_
    @haenno_ 6 років тому +22

    I think Water Nova (3:43) could be balanced if you give it that "spelldamage counts twice" effect. So you can deal 2 damage to all enemies in a specific situation cause you still need the totem.

  • @gavincam3849
    @gavincam3849 6 років тому +227

    If the Doctor Boom Hero doesn’t cost 7, I’m suing Blizzard

    • @livedandletdie
      @livedandletdie 6 років тому +44

      Dr. Boom MAD Scientist will cost 11 mana just to piss you off.

    • @loganmcvey3339
      @loganmcvey3339 6 років тому +7

      It does cost 7, people confirmed it by zooming in enough.

    • @Remmeeee
      @Remmeeee 6 років тому

      Logan Mcvey i hope this comment was a joke, just like the zooming in stuff 😂

    • @sedfer411
      @sedfer411 6 років тому

      How the fuck did this comment get 150 likes?

    • @rhysbarrett5449
      @rhysbarrett5449 6 років тому +1

      @@sedfer411 Dr. Boom is Dr. 7

  • @thatguy-gi4bk
    @thatguy-gi4bk 6 років тому +213

    Showed the wrong version of hemmet during the greater pômorph part

  • @Parallaces
    @Parallaces 6 років тому +39

    Rush.
    During your opponent's turn, this card is a random mage secret.
    That effect means it'll be a minion again on your turn without having to specify it. Clean and simple.

    • @OmegaA1000
      @OmegaA1000 6 років тому +5

      you end up with a different card since it can attack the moment it is played

    • @someordinarymemer9182
      @someordinarymemer9182 6 років тому +5

      can't go face. My tempo mage is ruined

    • @liamjones2131
      @liamjones2131 6 років тому +4

      OmegaA1000 Or improve it,
      4/3, at the end of your turn place a *random* mage secret on the field.

    • @Gravekeeperx
      @Gravekeeperx 6 років тому +3

      Liam Jones Too snowbally, too strong, and doesn't feel like the same card anymore.

    • @0IIIIII
      @0IIIIII 6 років тому

      It’s unbalanced and weird. Proof that Reddit is full of retards with no life

  • @ZackBogucki
    @ZackBogucki 6 років тому +1

    Get Ragt! is definitely a nightmare for balancing without creating an RNG-heavy tool for burn mage. If the trigger was something like "If your opponent has at least 3 minions, deal 8 damage to a random enemy," it would mitigate the chance of it going face and keep it as a board control tool first and foremost, while also having that Ragnaros flavor.

  • @saffrontart7905
    @saffrontart7905 4 роки тому +1

    2:50
    Golden Retriever should be epic and a have:
    Battlecry: Discover a golden copy of a card from your deck.

  • @OsvaldoChannel1
    @OsvaldoChannel1 6 років тому +10

    Get Ragt gets 6 stars for design just for the amazing wordplay

  • @tobiaskjaer6035
    @tobiaskjaer6035 6 років тому +6

    Golden retriever should be changed to: BATTLECRY: draw a card. Turn it into a golden card.

  • @fgregerfeaxcwfeffece
    @fgregerfeaxcwfeffece 6 років тому +1

    Roca the wall would make fatigue warrior great again!
    For that end you could even remove the "draw a card" and just make the spell cost zero and not instacast. This way it's much slower but stronger for specifically that archetype.

  • @Gabriel64468
    @Gabriel64468 6 років тому +2

    Malygos+Water Nova: 9 Mana deal 5 damage to the entire enemy board and put a 4/12 into play.
    Seems like that would be really good in a burn oriented Shaman deck, though maybe it is missing some of the support around it.
    Such a deck would almost certainly also be running Thalnos for draw+spelldamage and you can roll totems, which should be enough to make it a good tool against aggro/midrange decks, and against control decks you should have a good MU already if there is some kind of OTK you can setup with Malygos (yes using Malygos for the clear combo would then take that away, but it gives Malygos flexibility), but with ancestors call gone and emperor also not in standard I am not sure how you would go about trying to OTK with Shaman currently.
    As I said: Seems like it is missing some support cards, but seems really fun

  • @Anechoic
    @Anechoic 6 років тому +53

    Faceless reaper is not like Trogg Gloomeater. If a 3/4 attacks the Faceless reaper it becomes a 3/6 and both minions survive.

    • @Pistolsatsean
      @Pistolsatsean 6 років тому +35

      He was saying that to highlight that it is worse than trogg gloomeater, which is not played therefore its really weak.

    • @wejwyj2230
      @wejwyj2230 6 років тому

      Tim_Logik It reminds me of Black avatar from Yu-Gi-Oh with same gimmick and guess what, it sees zero play because it gets blown up before you even get to the battle phase

    • @Aces00
      @Aces00 6 років тому

      Wejwyj And that just goes to show how different YGO is from Hearthstone

    • @wejwyj2230
      @wejwyj2230 6 років тому

      Ace Yeah, Yu-Gi-Oh relies a lot on synchro and xyz plays instead of just rng

    • @adamxue6096
      @adamxue6096 6 років тому

      You mean "The Wicked Avatar" ?
      Well yes the card saw no play, but that was because OCG versions of god cards, wicked cards blah blah sucked shit.
      It was also bad because it can only really be done with well, tributing 3 monsters, and if you run a deck that spam monsters?
      You might as well do with some cards that had much better resistence to effects/damage.
      That said, the wicked avatar was a hilarious card that says this cards atk is equal to the highest atk on the field plus 100.
      So it was pretty much just about the best beatstick you ever would get.
      That said, Kaijus, emperors, blah blah. (Or go one step lower you have BLS Envoy of beginning(Which can either just banish a card, or if it kills a monster it can atk again. It also has 3k atk), which is like, having one dark type and one light type die in the game and you can summon him for ABSOLUTE FREE(Well you would need to banish those two monsters but like, special summon...) and he sees ZERO PLAY nowdays.)
      Wickeds, gods, whatevers, these cards don't see play simply because there are way more powerful choices.
      PS: The other two wicked cards, one was a Wicked Dreadroot a 4k/4k beatstick that would have all other monsters on the field halving their stats, yes, yours as well, it sucked. The other one Wicked Eraser is basically when it gets blown up either by your opponent or whatsoever, you can blow up everything on your opponents board.
      But like, Wicked eraser is like so much harder to do than just bringing out a Mirror Force Dragon, and guess what, Mirror Force dragon still, doesn't see play, even though its effect is like better, and you only needed to just pop a Fang of Critas on Mirrorforce, instead of tributing 3 monsters which is kind of a pain in the ass.
      None of those saw really much play, well, Mirror force sees play ofc, but not the dragon.
      It just turned out that card advantage is really important.
      Oh and yeah cards that doesn't have resistance or can't stop effects will sucks in YuGiOh.
      Wicked Avatar has like slight resistance as to your opponent can't activate trap cards for two turns.
      The worst part of it? You bring out Wicked Avatar be like YES
      Your opponent casually brings out No101 silent honor ark and equips your lovely card as its xyz material.
      Or bounce it back into the deck, making your work kind of just wasted with a simple Castel.
      Either way, it sucks for a reason, and the reason is there are better cards.

  • @XFrozenAshX
    @XFrozenAshX 6 років тому +43

    "I really like this design and it should be in the game sometime along these lines!"
    "Design! - 1 Star!"
    ... That's not how this is meant to work...

  • @raver377
    @raver377 6 років тому +5

    queen of pain with a different name etc could be an awesome theme wise card for a monk hero in theory as monks or atleast tank monks in wow have the ability to stagger damage which this represents realy well in my opinion

  • @AmberSixtyFour
    @AmberSixtyFour 4 роки тому +4

    It would be interesting if Greater Polymorph read "Turn an enemy into a sheep" so you could polymorph a minion if you wanted.

  • @azazelop5223
    @azazelop5223 6 років тому +20

    In case you haven’t heard it from the other 500 comments, you used the wrong hemet at 10:05

  • @dakotakade3547
    @dakotakade3547 6 років тому +3

    8:56 LOL yeah because we REALLY need Shudderwock to start giving them overload cards and locking people out of the game. Yeesh.

  • @jonasboel2473
    @jonasboel2473 6 років тому +3

    Orzam could make a good single player enemy, but should be “overload effects both players”

  • @toughmantough2492
    @toughmantough2492 4 роки тому +1

    "Madam Black, ridiculously overpowered"
    *looks at galakrond* man how the times have changed :p

    • @kholdstare1672
      @kholdstare1672 4 роки тому

      Meanwhile, Secret Passage is mercilessly mocking Trump for saying that 4 mana is too cheap for draw 3...

  • @danielvuurman
    @danielvuurman 6 років тому +1

    I think the overflow could be a cool mechanic for an adventure boss that ramps you

  • @0ctaviaPony
    @0ctaviaPony 6 років тому +1

    make it so the illusionist transforms back after the secret is triggered. This A: Keeps the Illusionist as a threat, through giving it an attack and the chance to get in multiple secrets and B: Gives the opponent the opportunity to deal with the threat on their turn.

    • @laurasullivan77
      @laurasullivan77 5 років тому

      Hey you've been unbanned from free ham sandwich day

  • @Liverator
    @Liverator 6 років тому +1

    a better way to make water nova would be a 2 mana spell that deals 3 damage to a minion and 0 damage to adjacent minions.
    Without spell damage, it's darkbomb, with spell damage, it can kill that 3 mana 3/3 that gets 1/1 when you attacks and can kill a 2/1 that's nearby

  • @Possesed_Toribash
    @Possesed_Toribash 6 років тому +2

    Orzam Stormbinder is a really good idea if the future of heartstone reaches a stage where you battle to keep your mana intact and disrupt the opponents mana pool

    • @johnmonger1059
      @johnmonger1059 6 років тому

      It's definitely lore friendly since there are things like manaburn in Warcraft. I wonder why opponent mana disruption is not a mechanic in game already, I guess there are the cards that increase mana costs for the opponent. Destroying a mana crystal or overloading a mana or two could be meta defining, not game breaking, if implemented properly.

  • @kamildank
    @kamildank 6 років тому +6

    "A card that draws a specific Shudderwo.. *COUGH* Card"

  • @AntoineBandele
    @AntoineBandele 6 років тому +4

    Where is this art coming from?

    • @julianchavez1816
      @julianchavez1816 4 роки тому +1

      I know I am 2 years late but it’s from Reddit

  • @mdtegra
    @mdtegra 6 років тому +6

    Suggestion: Instead of rating the balance by stars it would be better if you rate them on a scale from underpowered to balanced to overpowered

  • @muotes
    @muotes 6 років тому +1

    I'd actually love to run greater polymorph in elemental control mage. counters paladins and quest warrior, and is generally good against any control deck

  • @SlumpGod1997
    @SlumpGod1997 6 років тому

    Queen of pain doesn’t seem to delay the damage, the text makes it look like you just take the damage and that many cards are shuffled into your deck

  • @VictouffeVideos
    @VictouffeVideos 6 років тому +3

    The last card is still a ounter to bakku/Genn decks, by negating their effects.

  • @yoshikoizumi7851
    @yoshikoizumi7851 6 років тому +1

    8:48 I would say change the Battlecry to "Draw 2 Overload cards from your deck" and change the Ability to "Passive: Whenever you Overload, your enemy overloads for 1 Mana"
    this way the card getting is way less broken and the Passive is not OP anymore, pretty balanced imo

  • @8-bitjazzfusion525
    @8-bitjazzfusion525 6 років тому +2

    They should change the Water Nova to read: Deal 0 damage to all enemies twice. (or three times, if that doesn't balance it)

    • @tcoren1
      @tcoren1 5 років тому

      8-Bit Jazz and Jazz Fusion if it is twice it probably shouldn’t damage the hero. Malygous my friend

    • @gido230
      @gido230 5 років тому

      @@tcoren1 it's written on minion so idk

  • @fuibancontafake3057
    @fuibancontafake3057 6 років тому +57

    10:05 What kind of Mistake is this Jens? You need some sleep.

  • @crunchytoast6007
    @crunchytoast6007 6 років тому +5

    You could double spell damage affects for water nova, so if you had say a twilight zealot and spell damage totem it would deal 4 to all and if you have the legendary from boomsday project it’s deal 8 to all. Still not really good or maybe even good at all but I feel it’s a good way to buff it if blizzard wants it or something like it in the game.

    • @DetectiveAndrey
      @DetectiveAndrey 6 років тому

      Crunchy Toast Then it would be overpowered.

    • @crunchytoast6007
      @crunchytoast6007 6 років тому

      Detective_Andrey how so

    • @WarriorF7
      @WarriorF7 6 років тому

      One word... Thalnos...

    • @crunchytoast6007
      @crunchytoast6007 6 років тому +2

      WarriorF7 ya that means it’s 2 mana deal 2 to all draw a card for a two card combo I don’t feel like that’d be over powered by any means

    • @WarriorF7
      @WarriorF7 6 років тому

      That's the problem: you can deal 2 damage to all minions using two cards AND drawing one

  • @chaosmastermind
    @chaosmastermind 6 років тому

    They need to make Mass Polymorph: 6-8 mana mage spell, Turn all opponent's minions into 1/1 sheep tokens. That'd show those damn Hadronox Druids and Cube Locks. While still being bad against aggro, like token druid, paladin, and bloodlust shaman.

  • @VomicaEmanio
    @VomicaEmanio 6 років тому

    I would change the Illusionist in one way (other that the change Trump mentioned that meant it would be able to attack on your turn). I would add "after the Secret is triggered, Silence this minion" which means you're paying 4 mana for a 4/3 which will turn into a random Secret every turn until the opponent triggers it, at which point it becomes a normal 4/3 (which the opponent CAN kill during the same turn)

  • @carthagegaming5545
    @carthagegaming5545 6 років тому

    One thing with madam black... If you are playing 'control rogue' you are likely to run into an issue of fatigue or burning cards with the combo. Yah the draw power is insane but it severely limits your plays. I'd actually lower the design score because of how extreme it will be, a bit like that mage weapon, Aluneth.

  • @momokisslove5850
    @momokisslove5850 6 років тому +2

    is this a bad change? 0:19 battlecry:transform this minion to a random mage secret and add effect summon this minion

    • @ZackBogucki
      @ZackBogucki 6 років тому

      I'd love to see that as a deathrattle instead of a battlecry, and bump the cost up to 5 or 6. Without a silence or secret removal, it would be an infinite alternating stream of decent minions and random secrets. Almost like a Mage Sherazin.

    • @momokisslove5850
      @momokisslove5850 6 років тому +1

      Zack Bogucki yeah that's close to what I first thought but I realized that use (5/6 mana) and get 3 mana for free everytime it dies (and that's super op because mage has really good secrets)

    • @ZackBogucki
      @ZackBogucki 6 років тому +1

      Yeah it would definitely be a ton of value for one card, even though the secrets being picked randomly would make them worth a bit less than their full mana cost.
      Your battlecry suggestion seems much more reasonable, even if it's less flashy! Reminds me of that old 4/2 Shaman weapon that summoned a 4/2 elemental when it broke.

  • @sleepysnorlax9384
    @sleepysnorlax9384 6 років тому +2

    Please add a flavour rating so if it's badly designed you can still rate it as an interesting idea

  • @strider2175
    @strider2175 6 років тому +52

    So I've been wondering for a while... did Trump lose a bet or something? What's with the outro?

    • @noahkarlsson2034
      @noahkarlsson2034 6 років тому +2

      Where can you find it?

    • @TheCzenczi
      @TheCzenczi 6 років тому +31

      he is a mad man thats why

    • @ollikuu
      @ollikuu 6 років тому +15

      Chen Not just a madman, he's THE madman.

    • @frozenstar8050
      @frozenstar8050 6 років тому +26

      It's the best outro in the world, simple as that. Never change it.

    • @fredriddles1763
      @fredriddles1763 6 років тому +1

      Not my favorite outro...

  • @desperadoshao9733
    @desperadoshao9733 5 років тому

    for the golden retriever, like its a dog and dogs may make mistakes, so the battlecry can be 50% draw a golden card from your deck, 50% discard it

  • @Nerdnumberone
    @Nerdnumberone 6 років тому

    Water Nova (0 mana shaman spell that deals 0 to all enemy minions) seems potentially powerful if you can find playable spell damage minions for your deck, rather than JUST relying on a totem roll. If you can make a deck with Malygos in Shaman, you have a 0 mana flamestrike +1. Looks like a card that would either see no play, or help make a new archetype viable.
    For Orzam Stormbinder, I wonder if the "overload your opponent too" mechanic could be useable as a single time effect on another card (like a spell effect, battlecry, or secret). Think of it as being similar to Loatheb or Saboteur, but with a more significant effect as it doesn't just affect a single option, but multiple ones. Theoretically, one could do some massive combo to keep casting it multiple times (a definite concern), but it would be very difficult and require juggling bounce and copy cards while overloading yourself. Maybe keep the card legendary to make it harder to pull off. If it's a battlecry and says "both heros suffer this card's overload," it wouldn't do anything with shudderwock, which lacks an overload.
    Greater polymorph also semi-counters odd/even decks as they lose the boosted hero power they bought by severely limiting their deck building options. Probably still not worth the cost. Some other decks suffer minor disruptions when their vanilla hero power is lost. Rogues have often included weapon-synergy cards in decks with few weapon cards, relying on their hero power. Using this card in these situations probably wouldn't justify the 6 mana cost like it would against death knights, but it might mean that the card isn't completely dead against these decks.
    I wonder if it would be interesting to have hero cards that weren't legendaries, allowing you to have two copies of one (likely with battlecry effects). How about a "bodyguard hero" who has limited max health (anywhere from 5-15) and a different hero power, but with a deathrattle that return you to your previous hero, like a multi-stage boss. You essentially you're sending out a mini-boss. Are there any "neutral" heroes? That could also be an odd idea.

  • @tvftw1
    @tvftw1 6 років тому +1

    2:20 QoP as a rare...if you had 2 of them in play simultaneously, you'd be pretty screwed

  • @JMSginoclave
    @JMSginoclave 6 років тому +7

    You know, Trump, it's hard to take these seriously, as most of your ratings are either: "I don't think this is OK, 1 star" OR "Seems cool, 5 stars"
    There's a range of how unbalanced or weak something is/isn't, and how interesting a design is/isn't.
    One's usually supposed to use all the range of stars one has decided to rate the cards in, yo.

    • @JMSginoclave
      @JMSginoclave 6 років тому

      Kyle Witcosky For once, yeah. He still says merits and demerits to quite a couple cards and follows to disregard the side he does not favor and goes "1/5 star(s)" though.

    • @zacnyberg641
      @zacnyberg641 6 років тому

      Jay Well I think trump forgot that spell damage shaman used to be a powerful thing. That water nova could work in even shaman.. put a few spell damages in case

  • @ChakraX2
    @ChakraX2 6 років тому

    With Dr. Boom, greater polymorph is awesome because it gets rid of that rush passive

  • @funnikids2581
    @funnikids2581 6 років тому +1

    Queen of Pain +Togwaggle+ Floating Watcher

  • @ZeRedSpy
    @ZeRedSpy 6 років тому

    I like Water Nova quite a bit, it can be used with some early spell power or saved up for a big Maligos turn. Plus, Shatter exists, and is a terrible card, so the fact that it is just a combo piece isn't terrible at all.

  • @Serenity23582
    @Serenity23582 6 років тому +12

    Can someone please define trump's definition of the design category? 'Cause honestly the idea of those lower rated cards was awesome (eg. Golden Retriever)

    • @michaelbailey797
      @michaelbailey797 6 років тому +4

      that shit would be broken. just put 1 golden card in your deck and its a automatic draw it. not fair

    • @TheMoocow2009
      @TheMoocow2009 6 років тому +17

      He was pretty clear about why he didn't like the design of Golden Retriever. Golden cards are intended to be purely optional cosmetics. Golden Retriever would practically force you to craft certain key cards as golden to use it properly, which is horrible news for anyone who doesn't want to spend too much money on the game. It also means you can only use those specific golden cards for best results, so you'd have to refrain from using the cool golden epic you just unpacked into your deck if it's not something you want to fetch with Golden Retriever. It completely misses the point of golden cards in a way that transforms them from a harmless cosmetic to a dust sink that hurts the game experience as a whole. It should've gotten 0 stars for design.

    • @Serenity23582
      @Serenity23582 6 років тому +3

      You just pointed out the obvious. I just wanna know the criteria of the category design. Because I thought it would just rate based on creativity or good idea for a mechanic and not on how positive/negative the card is for the meta or a player

    • @leof.2695
      @leof.2695 6 років тому +5

      The idea of those cards were cute, but Trump is rating the cards based on how well they would fit the game and how fun it would be to play them, and there's nothing fun about a card that rewards richer players by design.

    • @8bit_pineapple
      @8bit_pineapple 6 років тому +2

      A well designed card is one that blizzard could/should add to the game.

  • @TheSimMax
    @TheSimMax 6 років тому +2

    "appropriate, hilarious, fits right into the hearthstone!"
    xD i just can't right now :P :P

  • @SquishyEggo
    @SquishyEggo 6 років тому

    I think The Illusionist can work IF you already have secrets on the board. And hey you might get lucky a double secret might be just what you need for win condition.

  • @Akuyosen
    @Akuyosen 4 роки тому

    The "Water Nova" would have been great as a card to add with the 4 mana 5/7 spell damage dragon

  • @somyso3634
    @somyso3634 6 років тому

    "Suprise, insect" 😂😂😂. Funniesr shit ever

  • @SuperYtc1
    @SuperYtc1 6 років тому

    Greater polymorph should also transform the board into 1,1, sheep. Then it might get a chance to be played without being too slow.

  • @Linkfan001
    @Linkfan001 6 років тому +1

    How is Greater Poly not just as disruptive and broken as Stormbinder? If you added a hero card to your deck, you probably built it and play it with that card in mind. Same can be said of the class hero powers. Easiest example I can think of is any kind of control Hunter or Warrior gets absolutely annihilated by being turned into a sheep. No more 2 damage if you want to kill them quicker. No more building beast to outvalue. Warrior loses all of their armor gain or swatting of insects. Even worse, there is no real counter to being sheeped other than playing your hero card or Sulfuras after they sheep, which never happens.
    I don't really like disruptive battlecry/spell cards in Hearthstone, specifically because you can't feasibly counter them, other than not playing the deck type the hate card was meant for. They are ultimately very tricky to balance and you have to do so in a tasteful and clever way. Loatheb and Dirty Rat are good examples to look to for disruptive cards. Simple, not permanent, can fail, good bodes. Skulking Geist and Eater of Secrets are not a great ones to look to. Too permanent, no counterplay, low failure rate, worthless to run without teching in mind.
    Just my 2 cents.

  • @alexandersong5753
    @alexandersong5753 5 років тому +2

    2:25 now they added this card... well they changed to name of a current card to this... rip mistress

  • @Ninjoth
    @Ninjoth 6 років тому

    Queen of Pain with the treachery would be neat.

  • @samueltsao664
    @samueltsao664 6 років тому

    In my opinion, water nova, would be super over powered, its a great cycle card with auctioneer, and great turn 9 clear with maly, but any spell power built into the deck adding a 0 mana aoe would be really strong

  • @kenpallicer658
    @kenpallicer658 6 років тому

    super interesting video and nice editing

  • @Spanner1971B
    @Spanner1971B 6 років тому +9

    The Illusionist.
    Charge. Battlecry: Lose Charge

  • @normal6483
    @normal6483 6 років тому +5

    Would Greater Polymorph make the enemy hero count as a Mage, and thus affect their discover pool and various "non-rogue cards" & "cards from another class" effects?

    • @joaquinelias7092
      @joaquinelias7092 6 років тому +2

      Usarnavon You can only discover 1/1 sheep, definitely

  • @phwoggy.
    @phwoggy. 6 років тому +1

    OMG I got a golden Shudderwock from a pack a month ago so, 'Draw a certain Shudderwock', is so true xD

  • @mrpotatoe9714
    @mrpotatoe9714 6 років тому +146

    #BringBackDarkestDungeon

    • @anonofyesterday4650
      @anonofyesterday4650 6 років тому +13

      I second that. Especially now that the new dlc and patch arrived and shaken up the stun meta.

    • @mrpotatoe9714
      @mrpotatoe9714 6 років тому +5

      Share this around folks

    • @bzzinyo
      @bzzinyo 6 років тому +3

      mr potatoe yesssssssssssssssss

    • @Minihood31770
      @Minihood31770 6 років тому +2

      The colour of value!

    • @henrylangham6428
      @henrylangham6428 6 років тому

      Amaz is playing it currently. It's on his channel.

  • @jamesnixon6192
    @jamesnixon6192 6 років тому

    What sucks about the 0 mana deal 0 damage is there is no way to stick that concept in to odd shaman (so you can get the spell power consistently)

  • @Mr_Maiq_The_Liar
    @Mr_Maiq_The_Liar 5 років тому +1

    Just give the illusionist charge and battlecry can’t attack this turn.

  • @richardreed1337
    @richardreed1337 4 роки тому

    For the illusionist it should say: whenever the secret is revealed turn back to the illusionist.

  • @Junebug89
    @Junebug89 6 років тому

    Oh man did people not understand the point of the hero card battlecries. They're supposed to make up for the fact that you aren't doing anything on that turn, so you don't get completely run over tempo-wise. Drawing cards does not fix that tempo problem! They're also not supposed to be stronger than the entire effect of a normal card with that cost...
    I like that warrior legendary as a deathrattle for the n'zoth synergy. It also adds some small potential for counterplay, people can try burning off your armour before killing it.

  • @saltinecracker3237
    @saltinecracker3237 6 років тому +1

    why not change 'get ragt' to '3 mana: when your opponent plays 3 cards in one turn, deal 8 damage to a random enemy'

  • @jonathanc8845
    @jonathanc8845 5 років тому

    Golden Retriever: Discover a copy of a random card in your deck to your hand. It is golden.

  • @Victor-hy3ju
    @Victor-hy3ju 6 років тому

    First card is obviously able to attack after it transforms into its minion form.

  • @romantroshkin3142
    @romantroshkin3142 6 років тому

    Really liked Ozram Stormbringer. I want disruptive cards

  • @HaroWorld1
    @HaroWorld1 5 років тому

    Water nova combos well with the 1 spell damage totem

  • @akif160
    @akif160 4 роки тому

    Greater polymorph is turnimg your opponents heropower into paladins, in some cases, its good for them
    Edit: sheep are also beast so it could be good with hunter

  • @Bruh-el9js
    @Bruh-el9js 6 років тому +1

    golden retriever with kingsbane would be straight up broken

  • @cattenit2797
    @cattenit2797 6 років тому

    Greater polymorph would make your hero susceptible to a poison attack... Poison weapon or any poison minions would one hit you since you become a minion instead of a hero card

    • @leof.2695
      @leof.2695 6 років тому

      A hero can be a minion TYPE (like demon) but it can't be an actual minion.

  • @harkharring2572
    @harkharring2572 6 років тому +3

    Greater polymorph should also make them have 1 health and a 1 attack weapon. Like Jeraxxus.

  • @pollyphemeus
    @pollyphemeus 6 років тому +1

    One thing about greater polymorph. " they aren't ENTIRELY reliant on their hero card to win the game." Do you even play the same game I do?

  • @jakobmuntinga8861
    @jakobmuntinga8861 6 років тому

    But 6:16 is a combo not a battle cry which should be considered in the cost

  • @clappykrabby1951
    @clappykrabby1951 6 років тому

    I would kinda like to see a card like Madam Black just because it would help buff Tess Greymane

  • @senpaiwhy5197
    @senpaiwhy5197 6 років тому

    So about Roca the wall I do think I should stay as death rattle because well it could go two ways you can get more armor the longer it is alive on the other hand you could take a lot of damage and by the time it dies you could have little to no armor but as i said it can go both ways

  • @danielhakimi
    @danielhakimi 6 років тому

    Given Spirit Claws, wouldn't it be interesting to use Water Nova and support Spell Damage shaman?

  • @guardianeifie
    @guardianeifie 6 років тому

    Why not just give The Illusionist Charge? That would make it less wordy for the "be able to attack on your turn" and better (since it's 4 to face when it's played as well)

  • @sindyyeh6180
    @sindyyeh6180 5 років тому +1

    Your hero power becomes bag = your hero power becomes the Paladins

  • @luigigaminglp
    @luigigaminglp 6 років тому +1

    UA-cam just gave me the 0.03% treatment D: No Thumbnail 5 me D:
    Saw you showing renounce

  • @parkerwicht800
    @parkerwicht800 6 років тому

    greater polymorph should be an effect on a nuetral minion like most tech cards. gluttonous ooze skulking geist exc...

  • @TheBlueEspeon
    @TheBlueEspeon 6 років тому

    The polymorph hero card also hits Baku.

  • @benjaminbrat6150
    @benjaminbrat6150 5 років тому

    Maybe The Illusionist should be a 3/3 with charge.

  • @justanoman6497
    @justanoman6497 6 років тому

    water nova:
    remember arcane blast? Could be a route
    I feel your design rating is excessively affected by your balance consideration. It almost makes having two separate ratings moot.

  • @Simeon-Lev
    @Simeon-Lev 6 років тому

    Lol for nervous sapling, if you have no deck and run auctioneer, you can get infinite jade idols

  • @duwekapak
    @duwekapak 6 років тому

    I will definitely craft Madam Black!

  • @g.zoltan
    @g.zoltan 6 років тому +3

    Prepare for the reupload!

  • @shanedancer3895
    @shanedancer3895 6 років тому +11

    Wrong Hemet at 10:06

  • @HUKSAV
    @HUKSAV 6 років тому

    2:50 how about "win the game if donate more, than your opponent" card?

  • @yjk92
    @yjk92 6 років тому

    I would be fine with getting water nova with hagatha because most of the times I have way too many cards in the hand to play shudderwock and I would love to get 0 mana spells at that point.

  • @gneoz7238
    @gneoz7238 6 років тому

    Give water nova 2x spell damage. So if a minnion have +1 spell damage. Water nova gets 2 damage.

  • @filipdraber52
    @filipdraber52 6 років тому

    Trump, do you yourself go to the weekly card design contest on the subreddit and cast your votes? I find it peculiar that you give the contest winners such low ratings (from repeated winners, too), and sometimes the post on the contest itself might have some extra info or buffs/nerfs that might affect the card’s design or balance (case in point: the original post with the Camera Bot, pardon the spelling, had The Tape’s Cost reduced to (4)).

  • @kingme40k
    @kingme40k 6 років тому

    Thank you, Trump! Very cool!

  • @WolfBergMenace
    @WolfBergMenace 6 років тому

    Golden Retriever ... I have a golden frost lich, that would be useful

  • @egisxvx
    @egisxvx 6 років тому

    If water nova delt damage to the enemy hero, you could otk