Observation: Kapil Dev, Imran Khan, Shakib Hassan are regarded as greatest cricketers/all rounders that India, Pakistan and Bangladesh respectively have produced. The rest are hailed as the greatest ever in cricket history.
Kallis played almost twice the number of test matches as Sobers. In total he took 60 more wickets than Sobers and scores 4000 more runs. Sobers batting and bowling averages are both better than Kallis.
Problem with kallis vs sobers is that kallis did not win as much as sobers teams. So on that basis sobers was the greatest. ALSO sobers was a better fielder and bowl spin and pace! SOBERS WAS KING!!
Since an allrounder should have the highest batting average and lowest bowling average it makes sense to just calculate the difference and see who has the highest score. This would be the top 10 using this method based purely on what the players actually achieved in weight of numbers (Test matches only) 1.Sobers 23.75 2.Kallis 22.72 3.Imran 15 4.Miller 14 5.Jadeja 13 6.Pollock 9 7.Shakib 6 8.Gregory 5.81 9.Botham 5.14 10.Hadlee 4.87
Gary sobers will always be number 1 There's a mystification with Kallis great batsman but his bowling stats don't add up 166 tests for 292 wickets, that's less than 2 Wickets a match Not impressive
Jacques Kallis' stats in all forms of the game makes for jaw-dropping stuff. He scored over 10000 runs and took over 250 wickets in BOTH forms of the game, which adds up to over 500 wickets and over 20000 runs. Get your facts and stats straight my friend!
I don't know of anyone who witnessed Sobers in action who doesn't regard him as the greatest cricketer they have ever seen. I would have considered putting Imran ahead of Kallis, taking into account the former's captaincy and extraordinary record as captain (batting average over 50, bowling average of 22). But I think ranking Kallis ahead of Imran is also plausible. The Hadlee/Kapil decision is tricky. I think Hadlee was the better overall cricketer, but since he wasn't really a match-winning batsman, I can see why people would want Kapil rated higher as an all-rounder.
@@fruitopia6798 Indeed, I undersold him slightly - he was just that good. Perhaps the only knock against him is that even in his batting prime, he didn't make 100s at the same rate as someone like Botham. That said, someone who averages 50+ is obviously a very valuable batsman even if he isn't making a lot of 100s. Btw I think your comment about Cairns is fair, but there is a widespread view that Kapil was a much better batsman than his average suggests. I once found myself arguing with someone who insisted that Kapil was *obviously* a better batsman than Imran. While I still don't think this is a particularly plausible view, I grant that someone like Kapil batting at 6 and 7 with a weak tail might be forced to chase quick runs in such a way that isn't conducive to having the best possible batting average.
Come on IK is not better than JK. Batting at #4 45 test centuries batting, fielding and bowling. If it was not for strong SA bowling line up JK would be first change bowler instead he was #5 bowler in the team and still took 289 wickets.
Three categories of Allrounders. Batting all rounder, bowling all rounder & Quality Vs Quantity all rounder. Among Batting All rounders Sobers was the greatest as he was truly one of greatest test bstsman of all times. Among bowling All rounders Imran was greatest as he was amongs one of the Best bowlers of all times. Quality vs quantity all rounder Kapil Dev Greatest bcoz he is the only player with 4,000 runs + 400 wickets. He is neither here nor their bcoz of poor difference in average of bowling & batting. Truly greatest All rounder ever Sobers & Kallis as runner up.
@@realtalkmediatv3153 😅😅😅 is that all you got You people are deluded 10k plus runs in both formats 200 plus wickets and catches in both formats None of your greats can compare to kallis record and all you got is " he played lon kwakwakwakwka that's all you sound like
Sobers wickets per match is better .His average with the bat is better . Catches per match is superior. Go look at old videos of Sobers and Kallis in the field and you would then be convinced that Sobers was the best ever to play the great game called CRICKET.
If you really want the best all-rounder,where is Clive Rice,Ian Botham and those guys who played against each other in the best all-rounder competition?????????
Kapil is No. 6 & Imran Khan No. 3 Is this some kind of Joke ??? I mean 434 wickets & 5,248 runs in Test Cricket and you believe Imran is better All-rounder than Kapil No Kidding 🤣🤣🤣
No one is kidding here, you haven't seen the stats of these players. Wickets are not everything, "bowling average, batting average, wicket ratio, economy rate, conditions, performance & win matters. In test, Jimmy and Broad have taken more wickets than Wasim and Glenn McGrath, that means they are better than Wasim and Glenn? Nope average, economy, conditions & performance matters. Imran khan batting avg In test: 37.69 In ODI: 33.41 Imran khan bowling avg In test: 22.81 [ 21: 5w & 6 : 10wc ] In ODI: 26.61 [ 3 : 4w & 1: 5w ] Imran khan economy In test: 2.54 In ODI: 3.89 Imran khan wickets ratio in test (2.54) Imran khan wickets ratio in ODI (1.18) Imran khan batting avg as a captain In ODI: 34.91 In test: 52.34 Imran khan bowling avg as a captain In test: 20.27 In ODI: 29.01 Imran khan economy as a captain In test: 2.46 In ODI: 4.10 Imran khan wickets ratio as a captain In test: 2.63 In ODI: 1.11 Imran khan POM awards In test: 8 In ODI : 13 Imran wins as a captain In test %63.63 In ODI %57.46 Trophies as a captain 2 times Austral asia cup winner 1 time ODI wc winner 1 ACC asia runner up 1 WCOC runner up Kapil dev batting avg In test: 31.5 In ODI: 23.7 Kapil dev bowling avg In test : 29.54 ( 23: 5w & 2: 10w ) In ODI : 27.45 ( 3: 4w & 1: 5w ) Kapil dev economy In test: 2.78 In ODI: 3.71 Kapil dev wickets ratio in test : 1.91 Kapil dev wickets ratio in ODI : 1.14 Kapil dev batting avg as a captain In test: 31.72 In ODI: 30.66 Kapil dev bowling avg as a captain In test: 26.35 In ODI : 26.24 Kapil dev bowling economy as a captain In test : 2.61 In ODI : 3.70 Kapil dev wickets ratio as a captain In test : 1.91 In ODI : 1.24 Kapil dev POM awards In test: 4 In ODI: 11 Kapil dev wins as a captain In test: %36.36 In ODI: %54.16 Trophies as a captain 2 times ACC asia cup winner 1 time ODI wc winner
Where is Chris Cairns, he had a better Test batting and bowling average than Kapil Dev, his ODI stats were also amazing. Kapil Dev scored only 1 ODI century, Cairns got 4 in about the same number of matches at a much better average. If you look even further and analyze their home and away performances Cairns is consistently better. If you're going to rate Kapil Dev at 6 you are looking more at longevity than achievements. Respect to Kapil Dev who once held the record for Test wickets but he got those records by playing a lot of matches rather than superior performance, he once played a 3 Test series against Australia without taking a single wicket. By the time he broke Hadlee's record he had played nearly 50 more matches. How does he not rate in the top 10? And surely Jadeja has to rate a few places above Ben Stokes?
My ten all time fav all rounders 1 Gary sobers 2 Jacque kallis 3 imran khan 4 kapil dev 5 Ian botham 6 Richard hadlee 7 shawn pollock 8 flintoff 9 Sakib ul Hasan 10 Ravinder Jadeja 11 Ben stokes as his bowling record is mediocre infront of his batting record Im not putting miller , Vinoo mankad etc as haven't watched them , also klusner was more of a one day player ,
No one comes close to SOBERS. The Stats are there for all to see !!!, plus Sobers was one of the greatest fielders of all times, plus he could bowl great medium fast, and slow left arm spin deliveries, did I mentioned that he had the batting World record of 365* for a very long time!!! it is only biasness, and ignorance could cause any knowledgeably Cricket fan to deny him this Title.
There were almost no ODIs when Sobers played and far fewer Tests. So if we’re looking at stats Sobers batting average was better and so was his bowling average. Plus Sobers was WI captain for many years and was THE superstar of the game in the 1960s. For all those reasons Sobers is rightly No.1. And to be clear Kallis was a great great allrounder, he is Sobers’ only real challenger for the title of “the greatest.”
Where is Afridi? 8000 odi runs with excellent strike rate? Fastest odi century in his time, 395 odi wickets , a big number of five wicket halls? None of the all-rounders in the list have more odi runs or more odi wickets than him
Kapil should be ahead of Hadlee & Botham ahead of Imran. Kapil has more wickets than Hadlee & double runs with bat. My top 5: Kallis Sobers Botham Kapil Imran
They will tell you stats doesn't matter That's the only way they discredit this man He is truly an all rounder Many of the players is either a batter who can bowl or a bowler who can bat Kallis did both effortlessly then there's the 200 plus catches in both formats Truly King Kallis
i think it is high time to give more weightage to multi format players. There are several examples of ATG players in one format really struggling or not up to the mark in other format. Yuvaraj Singh, Laxman, Bevan, Border, Jayawardene, Langer, Pujara, Rahane, and a lot other comes to mind. This shows that there is no guarantee that an ATG player who had played only 1 format would automatically have become ATG in other format too had he played the other format. Based on that, it is time to keep aside hearsay and hype and place some brilliant all rounders like Kallis, ,Pollock, Kapil ,Botham , etc over Sobers.
If we look at Tests only they are very similar in batting and bowling averages, the major diff is that Sobers bowled a lot more than Kallis, at times he opened the bowling and per match bowled almost twice as many overs as Kallis who was more of a part-time support bowler in a team with some of the greatest bowlers ever. Of course Kallis played ODI and T20i as well compared to only Tests for Sobers, but we cannot judge players on which era they born into, I rate them equal.
If your analysis is based on the opinion of great cricketers who saw both of them play and/or played with or against them, it's Sobers. Chappeli regards Gary as the best batsmen he has ever seen .. never mind what he could do as bowler, fielder or captain.
No. Kallis was better - a much better batsman and almost as good a bowler. Kallis and Sobers are well clear of the others. I think Kapil and Imran should be 3 and 4 (or 4 and 3) because the excellence of their captaincy distinguished them from their rivals Hadlee (the best bowler but worst batsman of the lot) and Botham (a great match winner but a rubbish captain).
My fav all rounder flintoff klusener Cris Carnes razzak .
Observation: Kapil Dev, Imran Khan, Shakib Hassan are regarded as greatest cricketers/all rounders that India, Pakistan and Bangladesh respectively have produced. The rest are hailed as the greatest ever in cricket history.
Kallis is king of allrounders
No, Sobers is undoubtedly a tad better than Kallis
@@sanjaydamle6194 Kallis is better
@@sanjaydamle6194 Kallis is far better than sober or any west Indies player. Stop staying in nostalgia.
Stats
Kallis played almost twice the number of test matches as Sobers. In total he took 60 more wickets than Sobers and scores 4000 more runs. Sobers batting and bowling averages are both better than Kallis.
If it's about all round cricket than no one even miles close to great kallis. He is one and only
Mike Proctor was one of the best. Definitely in top 10.
KING KALLIS. HE DOMINATED EVERY AND ALL ATTACKS WITH THE BAT AND TOOK NEARLY 300 TEST WICKETS. HE IS THE KING.
Problem with kallis vs sobers is that kallis did not win as much as sobers teams. So on that basis sobers was the greatest. ALSO sobers was a better fielder and bowl spin and pace! SOBERS WAS KING!!
Since an allrounder should have the highest batting average and lowest bowling average it makes sense to just calculate the difference and see who has the highest score.
This would be the top 10 using this method based purely on what the players actually achieved in weight of numbers (Test matches only)
1.Sobers 23.75
2.Kallis 22.72
3.Imran 15
4.Miller 14
5.Jadeja 13
6.Pollock 9
7.Shakib 6
8.Gregory 5.81
9.Botham 5.14
10.Hadlee 4.87
Gary sobers will always be number 1
There's a mystification with Kallis great batsman but his bowling stats don't add up 166 tests for 292 wickets, that's less than 2
Wickets a match
Not impressive
I agree with you and is not so impactful.
He was in the team mainly as a batsman . His bowling was a. Bonus
Jacques Kallis' stats in all forms of the game makes for jaw-dropping stuff. He scored over 10000 runs and took over 250 wickets in BOTH forms of the game, which adds up to over 500 wickets and over 20000 runs. Get your facts and stats straight my friend!
@sharonmartin4036
Not impressive as a bowler 166 tests
For 292 wickets is poor for an allrounder
That's 1.6 wickets a match this should align you
I don't know of anyone who witnessed Sobers in action who doesn't regard him as the greatest cricketer they have ever seen. I would have considered putting Imran ahead of Kallis, taking into account the former's captaincy and extraordinary record as captain (batting average over 50, bowling average of 22). But I think ranking Kallis ahead of Imran is also plausible. The Hadlee/Kapil decision is tricky. I think Hadlee was the better overall cricketer, but since he wasn't really a match-winning batsman, I can see why people would want Kapil rated higher as an all-rounder.
Imran Khan was actually a little better than that, In 48 Tests as captain he averaged 52.34 with the bat and 20.26 with the ball
@@fruitopia6798 Indeed, I undersold him slightly - he was just that good. Perhaps the only knock against him is that even in his batting prime, he didn't make 100s at the same rate as someone like Botham. That said, someone who averages 50+ is obviously a very valuable batsman even if he isn't making a lot of 100s. Btw I think your comment about Cairns is fair, but there is a widespread view that Kapil was a much better batsman than his average suggests. I once found myself arguing with someone who insisted that Kapil was *obviously* a better batsman than Imran. While I still don't think this is a particularly plausible view, I grant that someone like Kapil batting at 6 and 7 with a weak tail might be forced to chase quick runs in such a way that isn't conducive to having the best possible batting average.
No R. Ashwin is astonishing.
I've seen Sobers and Kallis live. Sobers is unmatched.
Come on IK is not better than JK. Batting at #4 45 test centuries batting, fielding and bowling. If it was not for strong SA bowling line up JK would be first change bowler instead he was #5 bowler in the team and still took 289 wickets.
Gary sobers is undoubtedly the best allrounder of all time.
Don Bradman & Gary Sobers are the first two picks in any world 11.
Kallis,sakib and jaysuriya r lot better than sobers.
Sobers goat is kallis he said himself I heard him bro
Why
KALLIS no 1 always
No Ashwin, Flintoff and 'Sir' Ravindra Jadeja?
Heath streak, an unsung hero
No flintoff on the list? He had huge impact on cricket
Three categories of Allrounders.
Batting all rounder, bowling all rounder &
Quality Vs Quantity all rounder.
Among Batting All rounders Sobers was the greatest as he was truly one of greatest test bstsman of all times.
Among bowling All rounders Imran was greatest as he was amongs one of the Best bowlers of all times.
Quality vs quantity all rounder Kapil Dev Greatest bcoz he is the only player with 4,000 runs + 400 wickets.
He is neither here nor their bcoz of poor difference in average of bowling & batting.
Truly greatest All rounder ever Sobers & Kallis as runner up.
Yet kallis has by far the best record amongst them FOR an all-rounder kallis has 200 plus catches in both formats as well
@@shaheempashua6924he played more matches than all of them so what do you expect
@@realtalkmediatv3153 😅😅😅 is that all you got You people are deluded 10k plus runs in both formats 200 plus wickets and catches in both formats
None of your greats can compare to kallis record and all you got is " he played lon kwakwakwakwka that's all you sound like
Sobers wickets per match is better .His average with the bat is better . Catches per match is superior. Go look at old videos of Sobers and Kallis in the field and you would then be convinced that Sobers was the best ever to play the great game called CRICKET.
Absolutely Perfect 🎉🎉
If you really want the best all-rounder,where is Clive Rice,Ian Botham and those guys who played against each other in the best all-rounder competition?????????
Justified👌
Kapil is No. 6 & Imran Khan No. 3
Is this some kind of Joke ???
I mean 434 wickets & 5,248 runs in Test Cricket and you believe Imran is better All-rounder than Kapil
No Kidding 🤣🤣🤣
No one is kidding here, you haven't seen the stats of these players. Wickets are not everything, "bowling average, batting average, wicket ratio, economy rate, conditions, performance & win matters. In test, Jimmy and Broad have taken more wickets than Wasim and Glenn McGrath, that means they are better than Wasim and Glenn? Nope average, economy, conditions & performance matters.
Imran khan batting avg
In test: 37.69
In ODI: 33.41
Imran khan bowling avg
In test: 22.81 [ 21: 5w & 6 : 10wc ]
In ODI: 26.61 [ 3 : 4w & 1: 5w ]
Imran khan economy
In test: 2.54
In ODI: 3.89
Imran khan wickets ratio in test (2.54)
Imran khan wickets ratio in ODI (1.18)
Imran khan batting avg as a captain
In ODI: 34.91
In test: 52.34
Imran khan bowling avg as a captain
In test: 20.27
In ODI: 29.01
Imran khan economy as a captain
In test: 2.46
In ODI: 4.10
Imran khan wickets ratio as a captain
In test: 2.63
In ODI: 1.11
Imran khan POM awards
In test: 8
In ODI : 13
Imran wins as a captain
In test %63.63
In ODI %57.46
Trophies as a captain
2 times Austral asia cup winner
1 time ODI wc winner
1 ACC asia runner up
1 WCOC runner up
Kapil dev batting avg
In test: 31.5
In ODI: 23.7
Kapil dev bowling avg
In test : 29.54 ( 23: 5w & 2: 10w )
In ODI : 27.45 ( 3: 4w & 1: 5w )
Kapil dev economy
In test: 2.78
In ODI: 3.71
Kapil dev wickets ratio in test : 1.91
Kapil dev wickets ratio in ODI : 1.14
Kapil dev batting avg as a captain
In test: 31.72
In ODI: 30.66
Kapil dev bowling avg as a captain
In test: 26.35
In ODI : 26.24
Kapil dev bowling economy as a captain
In test : 2.61
In ODI : 3.70
Kapil dev wickets ratio as a captain
In test : 1.91
In ODI : 1.24
Kapil dev POM awards
In test: 4
In ODI: 11
Kapil dev wins as a captain
In test: %36.36
In ODI: %54.16
Trophies as a captain
2 times ACC asia cup winner
1 time ODI wc winner
Where is Chris Cairns, he had a better Test batting and bowling average than Kapil Dev, his ODI stats were also amazing. Kapil Dev scored only 1 ODI century, Cairns got 4 in about the same number of matches at a much better average. If you look even further and analyze their home and away performances Cairns is consistently better. If you're going to rate Kapil Dev at 6 you are looking more at longevity than achievements. Respect to Kapil Dev who once held the record for Test wickets but he got those records by playing a lot of matches rather than superior performance, he once played a 3 Test series against Australia without taking a single wicket. By the time he broke Hadlee's record he had played nearly 50 more matches. How does he not rate in the top 10? And surely Jadeja has to rate a few places above Ben Stokes?
being a fast bowler in India is not easy.
Where is Mike procter
I think Andrew Flintoff is a bit stiff to miss out
Jack Kallis.
Shakib.
Kapil dev.
Imran khan.
Sanath Jayasuriya.
Sahid Afridi.
Ben Stokes.
Sobers.
Flintoff.
Ian Botham.
Shakib over imran khan 😂 Gen z cricket fan
@@SharjeelKhan-o2uIndividual Performance Shakib al Hasan best.
@@KifayatTanjim Imran ke stats check kro zara ja ke 1 bar uski bowling avg economy avg or batting avg sari chezen 🤦♂️
List is incomplete without Sanath Jaysurya
My ten all time fav all rounders
1 Gary sobers
2 Jacque kallis
3 imran khan
4 kapil dev
5 Ian botham
6 Richard hadlee
7 shawn pollock
8 flintoff
9 Sakib ul Hasan
10 Ravinder Jadeja
11 Ben stokes as his bowling record is mediocre infront of his batting record
Im not putting miller , Vinoo mankad etc as haven't watched them , also klusner was more of a one day player ,
Kallis Flintoff Andrew Symonds
Missing Lance klusner (rsa)
Anrew flintoff (Eng)
Wasim Akram (Pak)
No one comes close to SOBERS. The Stats are there for all to see !!!, plus Sobers was one of the greatest fielders of all times, plus he could bowl great medium fast, and slow left arm spin deliveries, did I mentioned that he had the batting World record of 365* for a very long time!!! it is only biasness, and ignorance could cause any knowledgeably Cricket fan to deny him this Title.
Some historical perspective is required. What about Frank Woolley?
Remember Eddie Barlow.
Kallis was miles ahead of Sobers ... revisit your stats!
There were almost no ODIs when Sobers played and far fewer Tests. So if we’re looking at stats Sobers batting average was better and so was his bowling average. Plus Sobers was WI captain for many years and was THE superstar of the game in the 1960s. For all those reasons Sobers is rightly No.1. And to be clear Kallis was a great great allrounder, he is Sobers’ only real challenger for the title of “the greatest.”
@@dave55ides
Kallis not fit to clean Sobers’ boots.
. . .
No match between Kallis and Sobers.
@@dave55idesYes, agreed.
Kallis ahead of sobers ? kapil is a wc winning alrounder is much ahead.
1 jaques kallis
2 Sobers
3 Botham
4 kapil dev
5 hadlee
I think Kapil as an allrounder was better than Richard Haddley
Wasim Akram ?
Shakibs records are far better than stokes 😊
Sobers, Bradman always should be out of any comparisons
Where is Afridi? 8000 odi runs with excellent strike rate? Fastest odi century in his time, 395 odi wickets , a big number of five wicket halls? None of the all-rounders in the list have more odi runs or more odi wickets than him
Kallis has more than 10k runs in both formats
jayasurya Steve Waugh hariscrains chrisharys stainer ravindra jadeja flintof mohmad nabi
Gen z cricket fan
King kallis
Yuvraj singh
Kallis ranks1st,kapil ranks 3rd
Wally Hammond
Wilfred Rhodes?????
Garry sobers only test player.
Does the video maker know anything about cricket? His pronunciation of some of the cricketers' names suggests he does not.
Sanath Jayasuriya should be included
Shahid Afridi , Abdul Razzaq?
Nope, not even in top 20
Mankad ,Durrani , Alan Davidson ,Klusner , DB Close,Flintoff , Worrel Goddard & a few more are were truly great alrounders.
Kapil should be ahead of Hadlee & Botham ahead of Imran. Kapil has more wickets than Hadlee & double runs with bat.
My top 5:
Kallis
Sobers
Botham
Kapil
Imran
The catches are missing.??
Kallis is the best where u getting your stats
Instead of Imran Niazi the cheater Wasim Akram should have been included in the top 10
where is wasim akram , ravinder jadeja ?
Clive Rice, was 3 times single wicket champion of the World !!
The rankings are justified. I endorse them. I don't know about Miller. Kapil Dev was the most outstanding fielder. Absolute natural athlete
Miller qualifies as an all-rounder because of his fielding and a good ability to bowl off break when needed.
The list of top 10 is not correct
Why Shahid Afridi was not included in the list Bettet than Imran in bowling bating and fielding
Well come imran khan
Kallis is the best cricketer of all time if you look at his stat's.
And that's from an Aussie 🇦🇺.
They will tell you stats doesn't matter That's the only way they discredit this man He is truly an all rounder Many of the players is either a batter who can bowl or a bowler who can bat Kallis did both effortlessly then there's the 200 plus catches in both formats Truly King Kallis
Kapil Dev is better than Richard Hadlee
Mike Proctor better than both
@@sauron2000000
Unfortunately he didn't play many Tests
@@dhaanushl6465 Also Clive Rice.
@@sauron2000000
Barry Richards, Grame Pollock and many more
@@dhaanushl6465 If you compare his first class averages against the other he actually comes out as the best of the lot
i think it is high time to give more weightage to multi format players. There are several examples of ATG players in one format really struggling or not up to the mark in other format. Yuvaraj Singh, Laxman, Bevan, Border, Jayawardene, Langer, Pujara, Rahane,
and a lot other comes to mind. This shows that there is no guarantee that an ATG player who had played only 1 format would automatically have become ATG in other format too had he played the other format. Based on that, it is time to keep aside
hearsay and hype and place some brilliant all rounders like Kallis, ,Pollock, Kapil ,Botham , etc over Sobers.
Who cares about ODI/T20. Test cricket is the only way to compare cricketers from bygone ages with modern players
@@markfullager9311 each to their own ...
Sanat jayasurya,Andrew flintoff Steve waugh
Kallis was far better than Sobers . Taking nothing away from Sobers amazing allrounder but nowhere near Kallis class
I totally agree.
If we look at Tests only they are very similar in batting and bowling averages, the major diff is that Sobers bowled a lot more than Kallis, at times he opened the bowling and per match bowled almost twice as many overs as Kallis who was more of a part-time support bowler in a team with some of the greatest bowlers ever.
Of course Kallis played ODI and T20i as well compared to only Tests for Sobers, but we cannot judge players on which era they born into, I rate them equal.
Rather have Mike Procter than Kallis
Wasim akram and flintof also deserving
Imran khan number 1
If you're doing the analysis based on stats then Kallis is way ahead of everyone. If your analysis is based on sentiment then it's Sobers
If your analysis is based on the opinion of great cricketers who saw both of them play and/or played with or against them, it's Sobers. Chappeli regards Gary as the best batsmen he has ever seen .. never mind what he could do as bowler, fielder or captain.
@ricardobufo the stat's don't have him anywhere near Kallis. Chappell didn't play against Kallis
@@davidpetrina4438how can any of them stats match up to kallis when clearly he played more matches than all of them?
Kapil can never come below Hadlee and Imran and Kallis was far far better than Sobers.
So why isn’t sachin better than bradman?
According to stats nobody close to Kallis
All rounder means only kallis
King Kellis no doubt about it,check the stats!!
Sir Garfield Sobers is without doubt the greatest all-rounder ever. His first class runs were not even mentioned.
@@richardbyer8127Kallis has a way better record not to mention 200 plus catches in both formats
As an All Rounder there's no one better
Missing sanat Jayasurya...😢
One day match...10000+runs...
And 350+ wicket..😊
# 10 ????? Take him out and count Ravindra Jadeja
Your father yuvraj singh best all rounder
Kallis is ever no 1 cricketer of world, sobers was prxy type boller, don't compere him with kallis.
Another stupid list made by a person who only knows recent cricketers with the exception of Sobers and Miller.
What about Ravi Ashwin? What about Ravi Shastri Wasim Akram…
Kapil comes at 2
No. Kallis was better - a much better batsman and almost as good a bowler. Kallis and Sobers are well clear of the others. I think Kapil and Imran should be 3 and 4 (or 4 and 3) because the excellence of their captaincy distinguished them from their rivals Hadlee (the best bowler but worst batsman of the lot) and Botham (a great match winner but a rubbish captain).
Never.
Kallis is not even close. The second probably jaisurya or shakib. Sober by no means is better than either of the 3.
Mmmm...the stats say that Jacques Kallis is the best allrounder (by quite a big margin) 🤔🙄
Where is Sanath Jayasuriya
This line up.is a joke.kapil dev is no2.a captain.a bowler,a fielder in 83 windies upset.no 1 is sobers.choker alrounders dont stand in a ranking.
steve waugh, shane watson ravindra jadeja, ravi ashvin
I think Gary Sobers and Jack Kalis both. are. equal level.
Wasim Akram?
Does the video maker know anything about cricket? His pronunciation of some of the cricketers' names suggests that he does not.