Don't fall for quantum hype
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 чер 2024
- Check out the physics courses that I mentioned (many of which are free!) and support this channel by going to brilliant.org/Sabine/ where you can create your Brilliant account. The first 200 will get 20% off the annual premium subscription.
What are the quantum technologies that are now attracting so much research funding? In this video I go through the most important ones: quantum computing, quantum metrology, the quantum internet, and quantum simulations. I explain what these are all about and how likely they are to impact our lives soon. I also tell you what frequently headline blunders to watch out for.
The White House report I mention at 10 mins 34 seconds is here:
www.quantum.gov/wp-content/up...
Please consider supporting our channel on Patreon:
www.patreon.com/Sabine?fan_la...
#physics #science #education
0:00 Intro
0:49 Quantum Computing
3:50 The Quantum Internet
7:38 Quantum Metrology
8:36 Quantum Simulations
10:53 Sponsor Message - Наука та технологія
Quantum Hype is when you can't know the level of the hype at the same time as knowing what all the hype is about.
I am both hyped and bored at the same time, you just gotta catch me in the moment to find out what I really feel.
I do think a ONE SHOT FTL comms device is possible, but it's so ridiculously silly to implement not even hyper-advanced civilisation would use them... First you have to move a matrix of entangles particles from their co-particles... Each broken connection = 1 bit of information, and the observers at point a break a connection on the matrix which is instantly picked up the other end, signifying something the two parties have pre-agreed...
--
On top of this we have the digital-analogue time factor. We could have a protocol that says, break each connection every 512 Planck ticks, with an offset 0..255 Planck seconds, thus transfer 256 bits of data every 512 Planck ticks.. Like I say, the problem is, it's one shot for each entangled pair, and the device has to be transported to the location first..
--
depends on whether QE can REALLY be stretched and maintained over long distance... if it's only possible a short distance, as I suspect, it's a ridiculous silly thing to do.
funny!
so instead going "|100>", you're like..."I'm like in Greenland on the Bloch-Sphere".
@@PrivateSi so, how would you detect that a connection is broken?
Studying physics, putting Quantum in front of things feels like a meme at this point
quantumlol
I would make a quantum joke, but you would not get it or it would not be funny.
quantum memes👍
The Quantum meme of memes.
Same with machine learning or AI, when you specialize in signal processing. AI is just a placeholder for "We don't quite know why but it somewhat works if we throw massive amount of computation power at it."
In Greece a very prominent TV personality has come out with a "Quantum Diet". I wish I was kidding.
You are fat, and not fat at the same time, just don't look in the mirror
@@x000s2 You increase or decrease your mass at will via ladder operators.
"Reduce the Quantity of Tummy with the Quantum Diet."
@@garyloewenthal HAHAHAHA
Sounds like a Greek Deepak Chupra.
For some reason it feels good when someone comes along and utterly shatters hype. Especially if the hype is positive.
Always get that mate. I'm excited about it and what she says literally means nothing to me, she talks crap. I have confidence this will have great good for us all in time 👍
actually, having quantum safe cryptography that can be used with silicon computers is great news which I did not know
@@SzaboB33 lol are you related to nick szabo
She’s a particle physicist. She’s going to be salty lol
@@leektid4624 so we have another potential Nobel prize candidate here, I assume? So are you saying she is wrong about the light speed limit of particle communication?
This channel should be called "Realistic Expectations"
I think "Science without the gobbledygook" is already better.
Yes , petition for that !!
But then the realistic expectation for how many viewers would click on it would be depressingly low! No, she picked a much better title: there really is a lot of "quantum hype" floating around. And because the hype itself gets it power of attraction from the word 'quantum', now the realistic expectation is for many more clicks.
I predict that Quantum Meteorology will be very big in 50 years.
@@mrJety89 Quantum metrology*
Wait, are you telling me the Daily Mail isn’t a good source for science articles?
Yeah, better read the Sun.
I predict that Quantum Meteorology will be very big in 50 years.
My reference source for such kind of information is "News of the World", in pair with the Daily Mirror. Some years ago it was "The Sun", but as soon as it disagreed with the Copenhagen Interpretation, I stopped to read it
No. It's just the same level we reached here.
Aye ! The JW's Watchtower is far better science based !
"What'd you expect from the Daily Mail?" -- exactly
"I'm good at math and science, so I became a reporter" said Nobody Ever.
@Miles please stop Christ is no longer king atheism is unstoppable so move on, if you are scared of death and want eternal life look into cryonics
@@cryptic7791 no need for that, we live by grace through faith.
@@justiceiria869 ah yes believe with no proof 😉
@@cryptic7791 proof can be anything, but there is only one truth. I believe because the bible speaks the truth.
You clearly don't believe but my question to you is this. Is your believe true?
@@justiceiria869 no because science evolves it’s not a conclusion and the Bible was written by men
Sci-Fi movies used to have "photon" as a buzzword that explains magic. Then it was nanotech, that explained the magic. Now the new word is "quantum". I wonder when they switch to quarks...
The photon, the nano, and the quark even is all actually quantum, blad!
They already did. Quark is a spin-off (Ooh, I think we have spotted the hitherto unknown puntrino!) of the Valhalla animated movies...
We should ask Muster Mark.
What about Dark Matter? xD
@@Smo1k Actually, I learned the other day that his name refers to a scandinavian yoghurt product xD
I hope the hype about quantum baking isn't overblown. I was hoping to have my cake and eat it too.
too late, because " the cake is a lie" :)
Born too late to explore the world. Born too early to explore the universe.
👌🏾👋🏾👋🏾
That's funny because there is a video about photons entanglement that uses cake bakery as a metaphor.
It presents two cakes going out of the factory at the same time on opposite trendmills. Experimenter on each side can choose between two tests : magnesium presence and taste. One test will invalidate testing of the other.
When one cake had magnesium, the other tasted good. In 9% of times both had magnesium. Logic tells they should be both good in at least 9% of cases. But they were never good at the same time. And this defies logic (at least in a causal, local and realist framework).
I guess people really like cakes.
I need more quantum in my quantum so I can quantum on my quantum.
After looking through your video list, I believe you should do a video on quantum entanglement. I think that’s where the confusion of faster than light information transmission is derived from.
I think you hit the nail on the head
yea thats exactly where its coming from
Recently listened to "The String Theory Iceberg EXPLAINED", an extensive display of String Theory aspects and there entanglement plausibly appears as wormholes.
This is an EXCELLENT video. I'm an undergrad currently taking intro quantum mechanics and this is all spot on. Refreshing to see a science communicator really get it and still stay paletteable
"Paletteable": the ability of a person to have a color palette as an intrinsic property.
@@david203 lmao
I love this lady. Straight forward, no bull. And she calmly eviscerates science reporting and her contemporaries when they stray
100% agree so sound :)love these vids
She is a very smart lady but she is merely fairly consistent within her own discipline. Science has its limits. Science is a fabulous thing. It has benefited mankind in many ways BUT it is limited. It is based on some assumptions, conventions and just plain arbitrary conclusions that impress many scientists...but not all. Science is an evolutionary philosophy. It will viscously defend what it proclaims to be true......until some really smart person will come up with something that makes current "truth" obsolete! Copernicus did that. Newton did that, as did Einstein and Hawking, and so forth. They blew things up! Some of them even said they maid boo boos! Einstein did. Sow did Hawking.
Don't get me wrong. Science has come a long way, we are greatly blessed/benefited by it. However, our "knowledge" is limited and sometimes way off. My concern is when science becomes arrogant with some of its declarations. My favorite example is where the _consensus_ of scientific thought is when the Big Bang Theory is presented as dogmatic truth. It isn't. In fact, it carries many contradictions. I won't get into that here. My point is that there are many scientists that disagree with many, and some times, all points with the Big Bang Theory. In the popular science community they are neglected or even ignored. That's my problem.
Now Sabine is a very smart lady. She has a knack for explaining things. But, sometimes she is off. I will not say she is off about the Quantum thing in this video. I'm just making a general statement...in general...generally, speaking!
When ANYONE dismissively says something is nonsense red flags fly. To me it is arrogant. All she is saying is that she disagrees, but arrogantly. Not good.
Sabine isn't "eviscerating" anyone. She is merely disagreeing. Careful!
Some people, in the comments below, seem to be overly impressed with her. Careful!
@ BaldOldMan The big difference with science is that, anyone with reason, validated arguments and experiments, can dish the current state of the art. You mentioned the most common names, but the way they based their theories were more like an extension and not a complete reamagining
She's not all there only mind. I lived in Germany for 9yrs. I've encountered this. But I keep checking her out.. and so far it's all good sorta.
@@born2bbald12 you aren't correct. Newton is how NASA functions not Einstein really. Einstein is how truly Space Fareing civilisations function but we aren't that currently. Newtonian mechanics landed Man on the moon. Nothing got blown up by Einstein. The next paradigm isn't the destroyer of the last it just reveals how the old paradigm wasn't complete. This is the imperfect nature of human knowledge. Watch knowledge or Certainty by Jacob Brownski from " The Ascent of Man" Science is actually intrinsically humble regardless of it's practioners.
An old joke:
Fusion power has been "30 years away" for 50 years.
That's because, as this graphic shows:www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/5gi9yh/fusion_is_always_50_years_away_for_a_reason/ funding for fusion research has decreased steadily-to-rapidly every year since the 70s. Funnily enough, the person giving this lecture: ua-cam.com/video/KkpqA8yG9T4/v-deo.html and his students, have since gone on to found Commonwealth Fusion Systems, after the fusion research reactor at MIT, Alcator C-Mod, was shut down after its experiment budget was eliminated, and aim to get a small, Q>1 reactor going sometime this year, using the revolutionary new superconductors he talks about in that very lecture.
Funnily enough, the real joke may be that this joke will be retired within a few years. Look at here for instance: ua-cam.com/video/eYbNSgUQhdY/v-deo.html
more like 20 years away for 70 years
Also: Lasers are the weapons of the future...and they always will be...
@@halneufmille
"within a few years"??
You obviously didn't read those articles I gave you.
I love your voice and speech speed and the information you give. It is really inspiring and soothing. This is all a perfect teacher needs
subbed bc ofc. first video from sabine that i've seen; brilliant, funny, informative, no bs. this is a gem, folks.
You're so smart that I almost confuse myself with someone who can understand any of this while you are explaining it.
Then why do you come here?
@@JohnVKaravitis don't act like u understand.all this alrigght
Yep, it all makes sense when she says it, but I just can't get the quantum words to make the same sense coming out of my mouth. I just refer folks to the videos...
There is another explanation ;-)
I'm the same. I still listen because it's fascinating, and I still do get the gist of the subject and end up more grounded in my lamen's understanding. Knowing the key points of contention when fighting pseudoscience and dangerous ignorance is important, even if you dont have in depth knowledge yourself. You can still call bullshit, and then direct the person to references.
I'm happy to see my hype getting destroyed, I feel like I'm growing up
don't worry, it's just the counter-hype. It will also go away after a while.
welcome to the post-hype lounge. we have cookies and peer-reviewed research papers.
Beware, the deconstruction of hype is followed by the reconstruction of hype. The hype must flow.
She's just saying all that because the Oumuamuans forced her to.
THE ULTIMATE AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA:
Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Great !!! "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=MA.
Consider the man who IS standing on what is the EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!!
E=mc2 IS F=ma. The linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE SUN is A POINT in the night sky. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Therefore, the linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE EARTH is ALSO A POINT in the night sky. Great. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma.
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the Earth AND the Sun are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Great !!!!!! Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=MC2 IS F=MA.
The EARTH and the SUN thus constitute and comprise what are the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) INDEED, BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. Now, very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great.
NOW, OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR. THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE (AS WATER). GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as this unifies AND balances gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy; as this balances gravity AND inertia. (This clearly explains BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY !!!) ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, the BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma.
Our EXPERIENCE is NECESSARILY that of what is the FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AS we are BALANCED between what are THE SUN AND c (A POINT); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. SO, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH/as F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. THINK about what is QUANTUM GRAVITY.
"Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !!! Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravitational force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Magnificent !!!
E=mc2 IS F=ma. Is a two dimensional surface or SPACE visible or invisible ? The answer is that it is BOTH. So, the electron AND photon are structureless. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to E=mc2 AS F=ma. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to the Sun AND c (A POINT). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=MA. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. E=MC2 IS F=MA. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense.
The BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) It is a very great truth that THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. Beautiful. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. E=mc2 IS F=ma.
By Frank DiMeglio
i love your channel so much...as a first year physics student you are one of the few physicists that has shown me a realistic and logical approach to certain contemporary physics that i’ve yet to learn, when i saw your book i had to buy a copy right away!!
Your explanations are so clear and articulate! Thank you!
“It’s just wrong!” Don’t hold back, Sabine, tell us how you really feel!
Hey Miles, trolling is for air heads.
@Miles Doyle What the heck has this to do with quantum science?
@@winfriedwilcke1705 THE ULTIMATE, TOP DOWN, AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF REGARDING THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA:
Time dilation ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
Great !!!! QUANTUM GRAVITY !!!! E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. What are the EARTH/ground AND the SUN are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It does ALL CLEARLY make perfect sense. GOT IT !!!! THE SKY is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. Great !!! Now, think about the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Perfect !!!!
By Frank DiMeglio
@@frankdimeglio8216 what are you talking about? Oh, never mind.
10 years ago everthing was ‚nano‘. now everything is ‚quantum‘.
Once again we have to give credit to the early Simpsons episodes. There, in season 10 in 1998 it was revealed that Kang and Kodos are Quantum Presbyterians. They sure knew where the future was heading.
Seems goofy to us physicists, since quantum mechanics, quantum this and quantum that, up and down states, tensor products of Hilbert spaces, ho-hum, all that has been around for many decades. It's the practical application to metrology, networking and computing that's new and interesting. Adding "quantum" only makes it sound old, to certain pairs of ears!
And after another 10 years?
@@georgesolomon9505 Strings and stuff...
@@georgesolomon9505 Cybernetics
Excellent content and presentation as usual. Thank you for clearing up the popular misconceptions about quantum science and technology Sabine !
i love this channel. She is fascinating and clever.
Quantum technology is to find a new way to transport cats in a safe way, the old way to put them in a box together with a radioactive isotope is still a bit to risky.
How do you know its risky ? you were not supposed to open the box
@@k0lpA x-ray? or heat radar?
@@privateemail9755 doesn't matter how you look at it, it's the fact that you're looking at it.
I don't know how to pronounce schrodigger
Schrodinger‘s cat never actually existed... Or did it?
Wormholes are real, I just have to go out in my yard and see them wormholing away.
Your video popped in my YT recommendation.
For my IT engineer probatory exam, i had to write a 40 pages report and do a speech (yesterday) about Quantum computing innovation.. My conclusion drawed skepticism and deception about the whole hype coverage..
your video is gread and sum up way better my pov in this subject.
Glad to have subscribed to your channel.
Thank you for shining more than a ‘quanta’ of light on this fascinating science, and enabling me to see more clearly through all the hype and misleading ‘headlines’ in the popular press/media.
Do you fall for quantum hype?
Well, yes and no
Yo
Collapsing will be yes or no.
“What do you expect from the Daily Mail” 😂 that would make the best t shirt. With bullshit in large letters on the other side.
LMFAOOO
yes, yes, 100x yes
I have no links to the science field whatsoever, and yet, I just love listening to you!
Straightforward, openly, and blazingly honest without a single ounce of hubris. Explanations I can understand without any scientific background too? I love what you offer in your videos. Thank you seems insufficient. Yet, it's all I have.
You're a phenomenal teacher Sabine!
You are also 👻
WHY HABITUAL AND SELFISH LIARS SUCH AS BRIAN GREENE, SABINE HOSSENFELDER, AND DAVID SPERGEL ARE PART OF A MUCH WIDER AND SINISTER NIGHTMARE THAT IS RAPIDLY UNFOLDING:
We always begin with typical, common, and ordinary experience in establishing physical FUNDAMENTALS/truths. LIFE is about living. TEACH REAL PHYSICS. E=mc2 IS F=ma. The truth is the way. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
Modern physics is BIG BUSINESS that is far more concerned with making money than it is with making sense and TRULY helping people IN GENERAL. THINK. They have their business equipment (telescopes, rockets, war making/destructive devices, nuclear power, nuclear pollution/waste, particle colliders, satellites, microscopes, etc.) and their other business practices (e.g., courses, books, tuition, "peer" "review") that they use to "corner the market" on what they then sell and present to you as legitimate and "ESSENTIAL" business products and "truths". They make ENORMOUS amounts of MONEY by changing experience from what is natural. In other words, to a very disturbing and significant extent, they are FABRICATING reality and the "truth" along with it. HOWEVER, TRUTH, reality, AND nature/natural experience go hand in hand. FACT. Indeed, if we walk away from reality, reality walks away from us. (STOP watching television.) In fact, the big picture is ESSENTIAL. It is called having common sense. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind.
INDEED, the big question is who is TRULY and actually "BENEFITTING" from all of this; and for what reasons? For example, are our tax dollars actually being utilized WISELY? Indeed, is being a BILLIONAIRE actually and truly representative or constitutive of philanthropy !!? NO, IT IS NOT.
Climate change/environmental destruction IS VERY REAL, and it is absolutely catastrophic.
Stop the rip-offs, the lies/liars, the delusional nonsense, the speculative fantasies, wasteful environmental destruction, the fear mongering, the escapist hysteria, the clowning around, and OUR BEING DELIBERATELY AND DECEITFULLY DUMBED DOWN REGARDING WHAT IS OUR PRECIOUS AND TRULY PRICELESS PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE.
By Frank DiMeglio
You can also be in the field of your biggest strength and once you truly ask yourself how people learn.
Thank you so much for doing these videos. I'm not a scientist but am interested in science. I really appreciate the effort you've put forth!
Thank you for dehyping the hype! And for those other videos where you go into more detail. Engagingly clear as usual!
Very useful video. There is a slight issue wit the quantum internet section however. When stating that the "quantum internet would be safe from quantum computers", meaning quantum key distribution (QDK) would be, this is not a complete picture. QDK is an unauthenticated protocol. In order to attain what's usually undestood as "security" on the internet (say, what TLS gives you), a post-quantum signature scheme would still be required. Therefore the quantum internet will still need some form of post-quantum cryptography even in the best case, as far as it is currently understood. Not to talk about the huge scalability issues of having to re-deploy an entire world communication infrastructure, which is also conveniently not mentioned explicitly by many of the people working on QDK. There's more important things to spend public funds on than this.
Every time i see a Hitchhiker's Guide reference, it warms my heart a little bit.
42. Loved that too.
It gave me a big smile :) Brilliant.
How I wish I could sit across a table from you and just have a great conversation and ask questions. You're such an amazing scientist! Please keep up the good work!
Be extremely weary of strongly opinionated people who have all the answers. No single person, no matter how smart or well informed has all the right ones.
I just loved the 42 answer. 😂 Thank you for sharing with us! 🙏🏼
Hi , just seen you for the first time , well impressed and looking forward to listening to you more .
Thank you for the excellent explanation of quantum hype. I hope that those who are in control of national budgets are paying attention to voices like yours to keep our science budgets flowing to the best you.
3:20 "They have experimentally tested that fusion theories work" deserves the Oscar to understatements.
Yeah... she could have done a more 'explosive' affirmation...
I'm loving your channel, Sabine! You're truly great.
The good use of the internet. Thank you so much for these videos Sabine.
"So what stonks did you say we should be buying Sabine?"
Quantum stonks, everything is better with "quantum" as adjective, even "stonks" (whatever they may be).
Can we then call it quonks instead?
Quantum Blockchain, Inc.
@@LuisAldamiz I love quantum pancakes, even if I have to use regular maple syrup....
@@jeremybyington You beat me to it by a few seconds!! Adding the terms "blockchain" and "quantum" to anything will increase it's value.
Omg thank you for mentioning the worm holes!!! I have so many students that mention that to me, like too many people are watching PBS lol.
I was looking specifically for what you had to say on quantum sensing. Largely, the coverage in this video states exactly the reasons I am interested in the topic. (without adding any detail)
It would be very interesting to hear about the kinds of things might be done in principal, and when we might accomplish any of them. As a former military radar tech, I know enough to be blown away by the quantum receivers in the lab now. No doubt there is much more.
Perfect video. Thank you Sabine!
I feel like the real hype begins when you do actually start understanding these things!
That's why she needn't worry about the "hype". Nobody understands if whatever was written about QM computer was being hyped or not anyway.
I wish that were true. Ignorant people just love to pretend to understand complicated stuff. It's called ego.
What is understanding?
Why do men (human beings) suppose all matter to be composed of tiny mice?
Actually it was a chap calledMakeitupasyougoalongidedes that came up with the idea that everything was composed of tiny mice that is now accepted by all men (human beings) with very few exceptions, although there are some that wonder why one cannot see these tiny mice of which all matter is supposedly composed, but I think I might have seen one out of the corner of my eye one day, and I once met a chap called Einstein who had a cat that he called Relativity because it reminded him of his relatives, and he told me that he had been shown a photograph of the tiny mice would compose all matter, and when I pointed out that it was hard to see that whatever it was in the photograph were tiny mice, he assured me that the tiny mice are very small indeed, and themselves composed of even smaller tiny mice, and that someone had told him that tiny mice live on some sort of cheese known as quarks, which is made from the milk produced by what are called muons, which look rather like bison, but then again these things are so tiny that no one can see them or attach them or feel them or any other way establish that they are anything other than imaginary, but nevertheless, men (human beings) are so credulous that they will believe anything they are told without ever seeking to verify for themselves, so it is no surprise that they dream up all sorts of fantastic ideas such as the tiny mice theory of matter, no matter how fanciful it may be.
Five gives you 5 million billion trillion that one day some chap will boldly assert that in fact however valid that tiny mice theory of matter may be, in fact those tiny mice are themselves composed of even tinier rabbits, themselves composed of remarkably small hedgehogs, and no doubt everyone nod their heads sagely and say: " of course, now why didn't we think of that in the first place?"
@@david203 42 but also can be infitine time stronger ever
I have to say, this channel is one of the best things on the internet that I know of. Thank you so much for the effort!
and she sings too!
You should check your internet.
Nice work , I loved the simple and realistic presentation. People oversell life itself
First time I've seen a video from your channel and you seem very well educated on the field here you talk about. Great video in clear terms even on complex topics.
How do you know how well she is educated in a field if you don't know the field yourself?
‘...and, really, what would you expect from the Daily Mail.’
I think I just fell in love.
Regardless, quantum technology is still in its cradle with a very bright future ahead. Despite its present limitations in terms of scalability, the hype isn’t unjustified. Quantum technology seems to be one of the few things that we can actually be optimistic about now days lol.
Yeah, the only problem with the hype is that people think we are close to having functional quantum computers. We will get there, but almost everyone in the commercial field is overblowing their current capabilities or timescales
@@mikeb3769 I think SAbine is underestimating the leaps in technology that will occur. We only have 100 cubit now, but you can do real work with a 1000 cubit quantum computer and we might hit that in less than 5 years.
Wasnt the point of the video, or what she meant by that.
@@creightonl5765 I believe that the title of the video is “Don’t fall for the quantum hype”. Maybe you watched a different video. It’s okay. We can’t all be winners. You’re the kind of person that sits in a dark room and scrolls through the comment section on UA-cam videos looking to make unnecessary contrarian comments.
@the actually false. The original comment was not contrarian, and I don’t believe that anyone besides you would suggest that. The goal was to merely continue to discussion. A fair amount of people appear to agree with me.
I knew most of this stuff but it is refreshing to hear a well articulated, authoritative, explanation. The future is bright, we just have to survive and the expansion of humanity into space will happen in my lifetime, with the help of quantum computing, etc. This future-assuring sea change is hampered by hypeboli and distraction. Thank you for combating that.
Love your videos the more i watch the more i like your point of view. I wish more scientist and mathematician had your opions i think this world would be a much better place.
I'm glad to have watched this and learned that I actually had realistic expectations for these technologies.
"Wormholes are not serious science" I've waited so long to hear that. Sabine has a subtle form of self expression.
I wonder if that was a trump initiative...
Wormholes are interesting mathematical constructs of general relativity, for instance, in order to check the validity of the positive energy statement in classical physics (The Penrose-Hawking requirement for a blackhole). Quantum mechanically this positive energy statement is allowed to be inflinged during the Quantum uncertainty period. This may generate spontaneous wormholes at the Planck scale. Anyway there aren't absolute claims of what is good or bad Science. There are well or not well done inquiries. Science has not a Pope who tell what is correct or incorrect.
There are no cheat codes on the universe.
@@seanbirtwistle649 No, actually bumbling Joe is still looking for it... Thinking it's where he stashed away some of his hidden cash... 🥺
The way I see it is that black holes were thought to be mathematical artifacts as well and wouldn't exist in the real world. But here we are taking pictures of them... So you never know until you know.
It's the same how I think about glueballs from QCD. They may not exist but so far we do not have enough information about the topic to rule them out.
Amazing content. Thank you!
Excellent presentation! Glad I found this video!
Sabine, you always do an excellent job detailing issues in physics.
The fame of the "Daily Mail" reaches far! Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre has been selected to run the broadcasting regulator Ofcom. This tells you everything you need to know about the mass media in the UK.
according to John Cleese, Dacre has had an arse hole transplant, but the arse hole rejected him
Tell me again about the "leftist media"
Thank you for the clarification Sabine.
thx for term "between" 0 and 1. When I've started watching videos about quantum computing few years ago I just couldn't figure what so special about be 0 and 1 being "both" :D I assumed it could be simulated with 3rd state and here we go
Sabine Hossenfelder is fast becoming one of my favorite UA-cam artists in the field of Physics and Science .
The 42 joke was subtle and brilliant.
Her age, isn't it?
The 42 ‘joke’ has been stale for decades. Stop thinking it’s funny. It isn’t.
@@LettersAndNumbers300 how about no
@@hertzfall0 Comedy has developed since using '42' as a punchline. It's not funny. It's just an in-joke for nerds. Haha we get it you don't. Haha.
@@LettersAndNumbers300 Ah, Jesus Christ I shouldn't have evoked any further opinions on this matter. Sincerely noted with I don't care and have a good one.
Thank you so much. Realistic explanations are what we need.
I've been studying quantum computing for a few months now and this is right on the money. It's exciting stuff, but it's been hyped up way too much. Great video!
Coming from a fellow physicist, this is a much needed video
Nobody asked you
I bet your like an actor who parrots science like the cast of the big bang, when it comes to original cutting edge science and math, you are useless, only a handful of physicists in history really understand quantum field theory and applications of quantum entanglement. You don't even know what light is.
@Divyajyoti I agree however im still very much interested and curious about undiscovered part of quantum mechanics. :33
Lmmfao
@Miles stfu
Thanks, Sabine! Looking forward to that black hole superfluid video too.
BH = BS
great explanation's of terms and technologies related to Quantum hype thanks for clarifying and providing useful context
Wonderfully informative video, tqvm!
1:56 - Quantum computer instantly answers the question of life, the universe, and everything. You rule, Sabine!
This cracked me up. But it still didn't give us the question.
Today on UA-cam, I watched a debate you participated in, followed by an interview of you. You're an interesting individual, to say the least. Quite inspiring & strangely intriguing.
> "strangely intriguing"
Just say "hot," like the rest of us do.
Thank you for this wonderful informative video. Brilliant! :)
As a backyard theoretical researcher ( myself ). You make a very good compelling point.
Thx for this perspective. I always had an inkling that there was a fair bit of hyperbole going on in the quantum computing articles in the media. Especially considering the hardware requirements (intense cooling, “noise” sensitivity of the qbits etc.) I always thought to my self: "How do you scale this?"
I think, the true use of quantum computing is not it's overall "power" but it's specialization to model things that would be too hard to capture with classical computing. I fail to see however, why all our mundane applications (like office stuff, games etc.) should be expected to run on quantum computers anytime soon. Because that would be woefully over-engineered and seem like a re-invention of the wheel.
True. Quantum computers are very helpful for specific problems (whose domain will keep increasing as new advancements occur). Quantum computers aren't devised to replace classical computers.
"What do you expect from the Daily Mail" I wasn't expecting that! Ohh I'm crying xD
love your work, thank you from my heart
Arthur Clark proposed 5 laws of science. One was if a senior scientist says something is impossible, they are usually wrong. My corollary is but it will take much longer than you expect.
Nice video. Love how the quantum computer spit out 42 since it is the answer to all questions :D
1:55 that is a reference to the meaning of life death and universe right, Sabine?
no i think she just chose the number 42 randomly :)
Very nice explanation. Just a thought; any values between 0 and 1 is pretty much what analog computing is doing without all the technical hassle that comes with qbits
Thanks for this primer. Most useful.
This was such an interesting video. All your videos are excellent but this one was full of information that I personally was unaware of.
Hossenfelder is knowingly and deceitfully lying about physics.
THE ULTIMATE AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA:
Ultimately and truly, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. SO, time DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Great !!! "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=MA.
Consider the man who IS standing on what is the EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!!
E=mc2 IS F=ma. The linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE SUN is A POINT in the night sky. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the SPEED OF LIGHT; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Therefore, the linked AND BALANCED opposite of what is THE EARTH is ALSO A POINT in the night sky. Great. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma.
Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Accordingly, the Earth AND the Sun are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Great !!!!!! Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. E=MC2 IS F=MA.
The EARTH and the SUN thus constitute and comprise what are the MIDDLE AND THE FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE (IN BALANCE) in full and BALANCED compliance and conformity with the CLEAR and universal fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Great !!!! It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. (The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) INDEED, BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. Now, very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Great.
NOW, OVERLAY what is THE EYE in BALANCED RELATION to/WITH what is THE EARTH. Notice the black space of THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. THE DOME of a person's EYE is ALSO VISIBLE. Now, carefully consider what is the semi-spherical, translucent, QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL, AND BLUE SKY. Great. E=mc2 IS F=ma. It is CLEAR. THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE (AS WATER). GREAT. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.
INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience, as E=mc2 IS F=ma; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/energy, as this unifies AND balances gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy; as this balances gravity AND inertia. (This clearly explains BOTH F=ma AND E=mc2, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY !!!) ACCORDINGLY, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. SO, the BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma.
Our EXPERIENCE is NECESSARILY that of what is the FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AS we are BALANCED between what are THE SUN AND c (A POINT); AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. SO, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal areas in equal times; AND this is THEN consistent WITH/as F=ma, E=mc2, AND what is perpetual motion; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=mc2 IS F=ma. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY does make perfect sense. THINK about what is QUANTUM GRAVITY.
"Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Indeed, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Therefore, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution !!! Objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravitational force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.
Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. Magnificent !!!
E=mc2 IS F=ma. Is a two dimensional surface or SPACE visible or invisible ? The answer is that it is BOTH. So, the electron AND photon are structureless. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to E=mc2 AS F=ma. A PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) is a balanced MIDDLE DISTANCE form in relation to the Sun AND c (A POINT). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=MA. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. E=MC2 IS F=MA. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense.
The BALANCE of being AND EXPERIENCE is essential. The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT (AND description) is improved in the truly superior mind. INSTANTANEITY is thus FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience. (THOUGHTS ARE INVISIBLE.) It is a very great truth that THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. MOREOVER, the ability of THOUGHT to DESCRIBE OR RECONFIGURE sensory experience is ULTIMATELY dependent upon the extent to which THOUGHT IS SIMILAR TO sensory experience. Beautiful. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. E=mc2 IS F=ma.
By Frank DiMeglio
Thank you for clearly explaining that QuBits have an analog value during computation and not "both" 1 and 0 like so many others state. That "both 1 and 0 at the same time!" BS is the most confusing idea ever to enter computer science.
It is only confusing because of the mysticism of the Copenhagen Interpretation, which physicists agreed to in 1927 and have slavishly adhered to ever since. A Qubit can only hold a 0 or a 1. It is a two-state device which only appears to be in an indeterminate state during a calculation. I hope that Dr. Hossenfelder corrects this sometime soon.
@@david203 The device is ultimately digital. But during computation, Quantum computers make no effort to force a digital state. Rather, they allow the waveform to carry an infinitely precise state between 1 and 0 (what we might classically refer to as “fuzzy logic”) while doing calculations. Calculations are accomplished via interference of waves. The determination of 1 and 0 is forced immediately before the value is read.
A similar computer could probably be built using fluids and disruptions to the fluids. But such a computer would be big, slow, and really difficult to use. i.e. Impractical for real-world use.
Which means that no particular interpretation of Quantum physics is required to make Quantum computers work. Only that we are able to create logic gates out of known Quantum effects.
@@thewiirocks Nonsense. Provide a reliable reference or admit that you made this up. From the Wikipedia article on quantum computing: "A qubit can be in a 1 or 0 quantum state, or in a superposition of the 1 and 0 states..." I've never seen anything about the use of fuzzy logic.
@@david203 Geez. This has to be the first time I’ve been accused of making up how a computer works. It’s really not that complicated. From Microsoft Research’s page (first result for “quantum computing superposition“):
*Qubits and probability*
Classical computers store and process information in bits, which can have a state of either 1 or 0, but never both. The equivalent in quantum computing is the qubit, which represents the state of a quantum particle. Because of superposition, *qubits can either be 1 or 0 or anything in between*. Depending on its configuration, a qubit has a certain probability of collapsing to 1 or 0. The qubit's probability of collapsing one way or the other is *determined by quantum interference*.
@@thewiirocks I did a Web search and found a large number of websites that claim that qubits can contain values between 0 and 1. Even though this search turned up many otherwise reliable websites, this is still incorrect. So this is not your fault, and Dr. Hossenfelder also somehow got this wrong. I apologize for accusing you of making it up!
A qubit actually contains a quantum state, which is a linear combination (called a superposition) of two basis states, 0 and 1 (the coefficients are real numbers, in quantum computing, I believe; they are complex numbers in general). This is not the same as fuzzy logic, where a logic value is a real number between 0 and 1, inclusive. That's were many people seem to get it wrong.
A basis state is any binary quantum value, such as spin, which behaves like a quantum state, meaning that it obeys the Schrödinger equation. It is not the usual 0 or 1 voltage level used in conventional computers. This means that a qubit is a superposition of these basis states, not a classical value of some sort, such as you would get by adding the voltage values for 0 and 1 and dividing by 2. A qubit is represented mathematically by a vector of the two base states.
Quantum logic gates are represented mathematically by square arrays (matricies) of zeros and ones. When you apply a quantum logic gate to a quantum value, by matrix multiplying the two, you get another quantum value vector. It might be a pure 0, a pure 1, or a superposition of these two basis states. You cannot get a real number, because this is matrix multiplication, which mirrors how tiny systems behave (again, according to the Schrödinger equation).
At the very end of a quantum calculation, the results, which are a set of qubits in some quantum state, are "measured", which means converted from the quantum domain (such as a set of up/down spin values) to the classical domain (which means zeros and ones). At no time do the components of a quantum computer hold values that are classically "in between" 0 and 1. All such values are superpositions of the 0 and 1 states only.
References: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition,
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit
medium.com/the-quantum-authority/intro-to-qubits-round-1-8ae4edcf33d1
Thanks, Sabine!. I was on the quantum internets going faster than the speed of light and then I saw your video and realized I am not supposed to be doing that!
That sweater looks cute on you by the way 🖤
very useful information. not found on other channels❤
Now this is who we want representing the science community, No bull, No shit forward thinking. Just straight to the point 💚
She's Democrat so there's that
@@bighairyfeet Your source for this information?
@@apilolomi4354 Dr. Fauci
I don't think it needs to be an issue with forward thinking, as it can draw interest to the field, producing more funding, and researchers.
The sensationalist lies can go though.
@@bighairyfeet i just assume ppl are, until shown otherwise 😐
I used to have a manager who often described things as a “quantum leap forward”. Every time she did, I secretly chuckled.
When I saw the title, I was hoping Sabine's video would also address that kind of hype: the "quantum this, quantum that" nonsense. But that will no doubt have to wait for another video, maybe focused on "quantum consciousness" or "quantum healing"?
42 was the answer from the quantum computer. Nice touch. Life. Universe. Everything.
Brilliant video and great content.Thank u!
This morning, I ate quantum french fries and drank quantum coffee and used my quantum phone to open a quantum UA-cam video and my quantum fingers made me comment, and the quantum thing I have to say is that I have nothing to say ;)
don't you mean organic?
Not entirely untrue but certainly mislading.
@@carnsoaks1 - Nah, it means that all is made of quantum "stuff" one way or another.
The only thing about you that's perhaps not quantum is your consciousness...
Sounds like you live in Star Trek! lol
Metrology is one of the most interesting things out there, quantum or otherwise. The history of Metrology is also really interesting.
Are you sure it is not meteorology? ;^)
@@IgorFitz Quite sure.
@@IgorFitz Metrology is about measuring. Meteorology is about atmosphere.
@@ShadowManceri Thanks, but I just joked :^)
Your lecture is very good, though the topic is complicated your explanation is clearly understandable 😊
Thank you - great work !
I’m waiting until Dr Sam Beckett gets his machine working.
What is the word - folly from this - all this - folly from all this - given -
Love the nod to Douglas Adams....42.
Eine wunderbare Frau! Vielen Dank für diese Videos! Ich freue mich jedes Mal aufs Neue.
That Hitchhiker reference was brilliant :-D