Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Condemning the Attack on Salman Rushdie | Dr. Shabir Ally & Dr. Safiyyah Ally
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 сер 2022
- Dr. Shabir Ally says the recent attack on Salman Rushdie is un-Islamic. He says the fatwa by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989 against Rushdie's book, The Satanic Verses, was widely denounced by Muslim scholars, since the Quran doesn't prescribe the death penalty for those who blaspheme. But at the same time, many Muslims felt Rushdie had gone too far in his depictions of their beloved Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and that there should be some limits on freedom of expression. Dr. Safiyyah Ally says that the Quran mentions people referring to the Prophet as a madman and magician, but the Quran doesn't say they must be punished. Dr. Shabir adds that the Quran mentions people becoming Muslims in the morning and renouncing their faith later in the presence of the Prophet, which suggests a tolerance for detractors to Islam. Dr. Safiyyah ends by praying for Rushdie's recovery and for Muslims who support the attack to turn back the teachings of the Quran.
If you enjoy this video, please support our work financially by visiting our website www.quranspeaks... OR sending an etransfer to igive@quranspeaks.com OR subscribing monthly at patreon.com/quranspeaks
► DONATE: www.quranspeaks...
► SUBSCRIBE: www.youtube.co...
COMMENT, LIKE and SHARE
Facebook: / letthequranspeak
Instagram: / quranspeaks.tv
Twitter: / quran_speaks
The example of Muhammad(ﷺ) was mercy and forgiveness. If some Muslims are to become vigilantes, it will taint the image of Islam as a whole.
Islam is not tainted by an act of an individual or group or an organization or a sect. Allah is Self-Sufficient.
Can you pls give us examples of the Prophet's mercy and forgiveness?
@@ayolawrence1241 The Conquest of Makkah forgiving everyone who persecuted him and his followers for more than a decade.
He said "Today I say what Joseph said to his brothers. There is no blame upon you today, I forgive you."
For every example you can give of his violence, I can explain its context.
Sahil Bukhari 4037
Your prophet ordered the killing of a man who blasphemy against him
He said it is lawful to kill for blasphemy against him
Mercy and forgiveness are never part of the teaching of your prophet
The devils disgrace none but themselves...
I somehow stumbled upon your channel a while ago, now it’s one of my most watched channels on UA-cam. Thanks for the updates.
I am pleased you like it!
don't waste your time
Read what muhammad ordered...
Sahih Bukhari / Volume 4 / Book 56 / Hadith 791
Sahih Bukhari
Dar-us-Salam reference
Hadith 3593
Narrated `Abdullah bin `Umar:
I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "The Jews will fight with you, and you will be given victory over them so that a stone will say, 'O Muslim! There is a Jew behind me; k i l l him!' "
Muhammad commanded Muslims to enslave others.. in Sahih Bukhari
Hadith 4557
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
Look behind the stones and k i l l them..
Chains around their necks..
Muslims like you may be nice people if you are not reading into the islamic sources. But those who do, commits atrocities while shouting allah is great.
Can this hate be from god?
Islam is false and Jesus Christ is Lord
@@nathansam9396 1. You have no evidence that the Prophet ordered this. 2. You have no evidence that Jesus is Lord when the 10 Commandments forbid to compare the Lord with anything on the earth and in the Heaven.
@dr a
Are you a il literate like Muh??
Did you read the surahs and Sahih hadiths i posted ??
Wat more evidence do you need?
Do not rant nonsense.
Islam is false and Jesus Christ is Lord
25:63 And the servants of (Allah) Most Gracious are those who walk on the earth in humility, and when the ignorant address them, they say, "Peace!";
Propet saw her (Ummu’I-Fadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said, ‘If she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’ But he died before she grew up.(p. 311)” - From "The Life of Muhammad" (Sirat Rasul Allah) by Ibn Ishaq, page 311 Suhayli, ii. 79
And now I gone puke on a quran.
@@gustgoris8009 This is not the Quran, what you are quoting here, but Hadith, which is a huge problem
@@DontKnow-hr5my
ANY text of islam is a HUGE problem.
When you guys don't like something in your texts, you come up with plenty reasons to cover the stupidities.
You use the islamic miracles of:
Translation
Context
In that time
Not authentic,
Metaphorical
Etc
Etc
@@gustgoris8009 yeah nice try.
This quote is taken from ibn Ishaq, p.311 of his Sīratu Rasūli l-Lāh. Ibn Ishaq fabricated some reports and is not trusted to narrate hadith by many scholars. He compiled everything he heard without checking authenticity without isnads, such for this reason, almost all scholars never take any fiqh/jurisprudence from him.
Shabir Ally never gets the credit he deserves going back all the way to 9/11. You're a good soul, Dr. Ally.
A rational response to irrational situation love it ❤️
Read what muhammad ordered...
Sahih Bukhari / Volume 4 / Book 56 / Hadith 791
Sahih Bukhari
Dar-us-Salam reference
Hadith 3593
Narrated `Abdullah bin `Umar:
I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "The Jews will fight with you, and you will be given victory over them so that a stone will say, 'O Muslim! There is a Jew behind me; k i l l him!' "
Muhammad commanded Muslims to enslave others.. in Sahih Bukhari
Hadith 4557
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
Look behind the stones and k i l l them..
Chains around their necks..
Muslims like you may be nice people if you are not reading into the islamic sources. But those who do, commits atrocities while shouting allah is great.
Can this hate be from god?
Islam is false and Jesus Christ is Lord
*Profit Salman Rushdie (PBUH) Is Moohamhead reborn*
@@vikramsawant7353 go away Lindu pagan
@@vikramsawant7353 🐖💨🕉️
@Nathan Sam "Read what Mohammed ordered" via Hadeeth. How do you know Mohammed P.B.U.H. ordered this?
These Hadeeth came many years, sometimes, hundreds of years after Mohammed P.B.U.H.
These orders are not in the Quran...
If you want to know Mohammed P.B.U.H. read Quran. If you want to know Sahih Muslim and others, read Hadeeth!
Amen. Finally….That is a response! Shabir Ali is a great man…ΑΞΙΟΣ
High and exalted thought of Dr Sabbir.
Al-Anbiya 21:107
وَمَآ أَرْسَلْنَٰكَ إِلَّا رَحْمَةً لِّلْعَٰلَمِينَ
And We have not sent you, [O Muhammad], except as a mercy to the worlds.
Thank you dr Shabir for condemning this! Unfortunately many Muslims don't, instead they praise it.
_Anyone_ who lives in a secular state has to acknowledge that the official laws come *before* any kind of other ideas or believes.
If you don't realise this you *have to* move to another place where you can live according to your ideas. If you choose to live in Europe (e.g) - *you will have to embrace secular laws.* Period.
U said it all buddy
@KaZee123 It is certainly not antisemitism to critize Israel. Israel is a country. In my country you will be mocked if you defend Israel. I live in Sweden.
They are not praising and defending the one who did it. They were being on the natural stance of _"well I'm sympathy towards him but at the same time, he deserve it"_ kind of thing. You don't expect that doing hate speech will cause the respond to be at calm level right? Of course some black sheep of the people might take it into the next level.
@@deenszxking6818 _"some black sheep"_ You do realize there have been over 40 000 terror attacks in the name of Allah since 2001?
@@ophelian4646 how about criticising Jews? you'll surely get thrown in jail for anti-semitism.
You're just proving that everyone has their own standards of what's acceptable and what's not, the problem is with western universalism, westerns think everyone should be thinking like them else they're savages who need to be civilized, you're still carrying the white man's burden.
This is a brilliant response,but I find similar emotional reactions towards those who deny the holocaust. I wonder if this is an inconsoncity within our modern society.
A very intelligent analysis of the issue of blasphemy and the Satanic Verses affair. A wonderful job by two of my favourite Islamic scholars. I want to unsubscribe just so I can subscribe again!
Thank you for this Dr. Ally. I think that it is very honorable of you to condemn the attack.
Do u condemn those who ridicule others in the name of free speech?
@@abbasibnfirnas873 No. I think that people and especially ideas should be fair game for criticism. I think that it should be done honestly, however. I've never read the Satanic Verses by Salman Rushtie so I cannot say whether or not his critiques are honest, but I do know that he didn't deserve the barbaric stabbing that he received, and I am glad to see that there are some teachers like Dr. Ally who will discourage such violence in the future.
@@BrentonSwafford Salman Rushdie was not critiquing he was mocking and insulting, there's a difference.
@@AJ-il1lm8ph7z
I think that people ought to try to be respectful of other people's feelings out of decency, but I think that free speech should be allowed anyways, even if they are mocking and insulting. Salman didn't deserve to be assaulted merely for mocking and insulting.
@@BrentonSwafford So if you deliberately incite hatred knowing full well the repercussions of it then that's o.k on the pretence of "free speech"? Its o.k to deliberately provoke people and aggravate them for a reaction?
So the thing is what is the parameters of freedom of speech? Freedom of speech is a precept which is an offshoot of liberalism. Freedom of speech you need to qualify with what's called the 'harm principle'.
If you really believe in the absolute freedom of speech then make jokes about the holocaust, about the 'n' word, would you do that? There are over 20 European countries and Israel that have holocaust denial laws and many have been convicted under these laws.
Make jokes about homosexuality, or transgenders?? You know your not going to say that because society has defined for you what's appropriate "freedom of speech" and what is inappropriate "freedom of speech". Seems as though "hate speech" is only defined when its blacks,or jews or homosexuals but when it comes to Islam everything goes.
Salman Rushdie is a very selfish person, he deliberately incited hatred. In his own words he knew it would create "ripples" in the Muslim world, he ofcourse being a born Muslim knew exactly what he wanted. His intentions were evil, he wanted cheap fame and fortune and he got that. Till date he is infamously known for this book around the globe..O the irony! The religion he mocked and insulted catapulted him into the limelight.
A fantastic video. I found The Satanic Verses to be a very dense read, and I read it as a story of outsiders, using religious texts to guide the narrative.
At the 09:29 minute mark, "dire penalties in the life hereafter if we... disbelieve" - I would love to hear your take on why a god would create humans with big beautiful brains that allow us to question the existence of god, or even to believe in other gods, only to punish us in the afterlife for using the gift of free thought?
In many cases, most of them have other reasons not to believe and/or lack information. You should refute all the claims of the Quran to show that it is man's work. Even if you can or read what others did, you should listen to the Muslims' response to that. Like, is your claim valid or not. Then it's all up to you. I mean Muslim response as an academic response not the cry or anything like that.
All decent Muslims, and I'm one who prays, attends mosque, should utterly condemn anyone attacking a writer for having an opinion. Rushdie's books are good. I've read them. The hysterical attitudes to Rushdie arec an embarrassing remnant of medieval thinking that should have no place in any modern faith.
Very well said Daisy
Have some shame! Atleast be happy in your heart... every blasphemers deserves that
then be proud of that person who gonna badmouth your mom in front of you,, don't hit him ever or else you will be against freedom of speech
Our religion is more than strong enough to withstand the literary attacks by the likes of Rushdie
The fatwa was issued by a the Iranian government whose jurisdiction is only the state of Iran. To this logic they were inviting vigilantes to commit murder however despicable Rushdie was in writing his book.
@@mawi35dz I fully agree the media is very silent when Israel kills Palestinines. Most of the media has to support Israel as the Western governments all support Israel. If the situation was reversed, if Muslims had been oppressing zionists, they would be writing headlines everyday. But I was pointing out that the Shia government of Islam was breaking Islamic law.
@@sparephone8228 any comment on Sunni governments like Saudi Arabia that routinely break Islamic law by executing people including children for political and sectarian reasons?
God is loving kind caring 🙏 and loves all his creations, if someone chooses to say something bad about anyone religion, leave it alone, God will judge us all, people I don't know how someone can attack someone one in this cruel way, anyone who has love for God, and believes in God will never hurt anyone 🙏🙏
It is the order of Their ideology. He has done nothing wrong but following Islam.
surah 60v4 hate between you and me christians and jews. s9v30 allah annihilate jews and christians in your quran.
because their God doesn't exist thus they are coming to kill the people
"God loves all his creations"? Seriously? Allah clearly doesn't love those who don't submit to him. Unless you are referring to Jesus?
Very instructive video, in contrast with the reaction from other Muslim scholars who refuse to condemn the stabbing of Salman Rushdie.
@@hasibabdullah3463 regardless of being a scholar, he seems to be very proficient on the subject. His posture is very enlightened (and I'm not muslim).
But is it the duty of all Muslims, scholars or not, to get set at all times to begin offering so called 'condemnation' on account any crime committed by a Muslim-named criminals?
The reason why blasphemy is resulting in violent crimes is mostly prevalent among Muslim community is because it's been brewed like that since it's origin. Even Umar, the Caliph was quick to violence when a kid, yes a kid.. was trolling Muhammad.
Narrated by Abdullah:
We were along with Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) that we happened to pass by children amongst whom there was Ibn Sayyad. The children made their way but Ibn Sayyad kept sitting there and it seemed as if Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) did not like it and said to him: May your nose be smeared with dust, don't you bear testimony to the fact that I am the Messenger of Allah? Thereupon he said: No, but you should bear testimony that I am the messenger of Allah. Thereupon 'Umar b. Khattab said: Allah's Messenger, permit me that I should kill him. ~ Sahih Muslim 2924a [Book 54, Hadith 108]
Islam is indeed a violent and barbaric religion.
Do you agree or condemn the response of muslims in nordic countries, regarding the burning of quran's?
It's good to see Muslim scholars condemning the teachings, and commands of prophet Mohamed who ordered that apostates and critics be killed.
Salute to you Sir, you're not like that Zakir Naik. 🙏🙏🙏
اللَّهُمَّ يَا مَنْ لا تَضُرُّهُ الذُّنُوبُ ، وَلا تُنْقِصُهُ المَغْفِرَةُ ، اغْفِرْ لَنَا مَا لا يَضُرُّكَ ، وَهَبْ لَنَا مَالا يُنْقِصُكَ
The FIRST condamnation of a muslim.
THANK'S
What condemnation you are talking about……Ghost Goris , you do know Islam.
@@ashrafsubhan8891
Yes, probably it is takiyya
He don't share the sentiment of 2 billion Muslims worldwide...we proudly support physical attacks on Blasphemers...
Thank you for your condemnation word and I appreciate you lots
I applaud the condemnation. Not gonna lie, I struggle to believe the genuineness of it though. I was shocked when I found out this incident happened few weeks ago. Oddly enough I was just watching a video about Rushdies life etc. I had no clue he was attacked recently and the current 'payment' for his death is over a million dollars...wow
Can we also condemn the satanic verses and condemn those that deliberately provoke the Muslims with insults.
Why do Muslims always have to condemn but not the other way round. ???
No
Because the western world in which Salman Rushdie lives, is a secular/non-religious society in which anything & everything is open for discussion & even ridicule, if people feel so inclined. No topic is really "off-limits" so to speak. Certainly Muslims can speak out & condemn Rushdie's book "The Satanic Verses", if they so wish - after all, everyone is entitled to their own opinion & in the west, people do have freedom of speech & it is not illegal to offend people.
But the western world would also "condemn" any physical attack on a Muslim person, who was being attacked merely because the attacker did not like something the Muslim had said in a book they wrote, or anything similar.
The western world certainly came out & condemned the attack on Muslims at a mosque in New Zealand a few years ago. And consequently, that attacker is being suitably punished. No-one came out publicly & said those Muslims in New Zealand all deserved it because of their bad teachings etc or whatever other reason they may have chosen.
So the "condemnation" is not only applicable to Muslims - but to everyone when criminal acts are committed. But in the secular west, it is not a crime to ridicule religion & not a crime to simply offend people.
nope, we won’t condemn those that deliberately provoke muslims
@@salvador8923
Exactly.
Double standards from the HYPOCRITES !!
The West in particular is full of hypocrites.
I don't feel sad for this man who disrespected the prophet Muhammad (SAW). No one has right to disrespectful the prophet Muhammad (SAW) and criticize Muslims.
Islam should be condemned by all free thinking and informed humanity
So should Christianity because the Bible is full of barbaric commands of God. Blasphemy law is found in the Old Testament which is sent down by YOUR God Jesus. Even if you say its abolished it still doesnt change the fact that YOUR God is the creator of these laws and therefore YOUR religion should banned as well.
I want to know what are the good muslims in this platform are doing to stop/ influence these kind of acts. What message is being communicated to the fellow brothers in terms of programmes and outreaches?
Why do we have to talk about this guy? People get attacked everyday, probably as we speak. Why would one individual deserve so much attention? It‘s an isolated matter. Let‘s talk about the near-genocides taking place in Indis, China...where unhinged official governments are doing their best with the silent approval of the West to cancel muslims altogether. Thank you.
You really don't have a clue what is going on man.
The whole world is clueless when it comes to Muslims persecution at the hands if bigots
@@gustgoris8009 No, I don't
@@nazlimerick3395
Thank's for being honest
These sorts of attacks really are not the "isolated matters" you seem to think they are. There are really many more such attacks happening on a very regular basis - & most of them happen in overseas countries where there are significant numbers of Muslims living - like India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, & various middle-eastern countries, & even Indonesia etc.
The problem is that in many secular western democratic countries, they do get much publicity in the media there - probably for fear of criticising Islam & being labelled Islamophobic & being made the subject of similar attacks.
This is why all such attacks really need to be called out as a clear statement that such attacks will not be tolerated. They all cast the religion of Islam in a very bad light & are not likely to cause anyone to want to to convert to Islam. Quite the opposite - people will learn to turn their backs on Islam, if every such incident is drawn to their attention.
Most western countries are well aware of China's persecution of their Uyghur Muslim minority & are doing as much as they can by speaking out about it, & the issue is also getting a lot of publicity in western countries. My question is - why don't we hear so much about what the predominantly Muslim countries of the world are doing for their Muslim brothers & sisters in China? If even the Muslim countries of the world are not doing too much to help them - should they expect the secular western world to provide all the assistance?
The wild rage will continue unabated despite the boardroom discussions and theological interpretations. Many were butchered and many will continue to be under threat no matter what the debates will take place.
The edict “fatwa” was issued by khumaini, who does not represent Muslims at all. He might represent shias, who follow him blindly. I really think khumaini turned Rushdi into a celebrity and gained his “book” popularity and probably made it a bestseller. The judicious decision was to simply ignore Rushdi and his book, then he and his book will diminish and be dismissed. Khumaini turned Rushdi into a hero when he issued the so called “fatwa.”
I agreed what Islam teach to be merciful and respectful but at the same time world (specially western world) should put restrictions on those who mock any religion or religious figures, but of cause people should be able to discuss and debate about religions without mocking otherwise no matter how nice and merciful you try to be there will be some people would take an action. End of the day how you going to learn anything by mocking rather people should ask hard questions regarding any religions. We can go on land on.
At last somebody with some sense! There are a lot of enablers in this comment section.
In the secular western democratic world, it is not against the law to simply cause offence to anyone - no matter for what reason - being religion or anything else at all. Everything is open to criticism & ridicule, if people so desire. If one objects to such things, one can certainly speak out against it, or debate the matter with those involved. But it is against the law to take matters into one's own hands & physically attack, injure or kill people - regardless of the reason for doing so. If one cannot accept that, then perhaps one should not continue to live in a secular western country, where one cannot agree to always be a law-abiding citizen.
Mashallah what a beautiful father daughter pair of scholars of Islam. May Allah protect them and our ummah!
if this weighs so heavily why is there so little outrage and condemnation from Islamic leaders…
I thought Sunni Muslims don't even view Iran as islamic so why were people paying attention to their Fatwa.
MASHALLAH they can be Muslims who support Salman Rushdie 🙌 A good Sufi vibe.
Words- we condemn such attacks
Thought- Well done,👏👏👏👏
Even their scholars cannot state the truth! Sad!
Would Muslims condemn if some Muslim or atheist attacking in same way other faiths?
No one has right to take the law into one's hand
@Sven Andersson Absolutely not.
@Sven Andersson Your whole existence is a miracle done by God (swt). There are signs of God's existence but you choose to ignore them.
It’s not allowed in Islam to attack anyone for talking and writing any words .
The issue is that when things like this happen, most muslims come up with the answer, "They are not true Muslims". The perpetrator will be a Muslim, he might be shouting the name of Allah.
most muslims infact say 'he deserved it'...
All those Muslims here making negative comments about Salman Rushdie, if you live in a western democratic country, then follow the law of the land. If you don't like the laws then you should move back to whichever Islamic republic you're from.
Mr. S R didn’t respect the law of the land he used to live in. He knowingly offended and fled. Now many people may not also tend to follow law of the land about him. It’s not so simple as you’ve just said.
@ukhtsam I know you won't. You will continue barking about iSLamOpHoBiA in literally every country you populate, while supporting violence against anyone who writes the wrong book or draws the wrong cartoon. Laughing stock of the world
Yes we are following the law of the land. Because the western countries give us the right to insult a public person. If he can insult Islam then we can insult him as well. So we are not violating any law here. There is nothing wrong with saying that he deserves to die because thats freedom of speech as long as we dont act on it.
Listening to a close friend and acquaintance of Mr. Rushdie it was quite apparent that the author severely underestimated the reaction to his particular treatment of a very sensitive Islamic subject. As much as I want to have compassion for Mr. Rushdie, I am also aware that there are consequences to willfully choosing to play "hop-scotch" in a minefield.
Disgusting view, violence is never the response to words.
@@fabscams4136 It was not about the violence, but we are dealing with human here, they have their level of patience too. When he touch the sensitivity of the people, you don't expect the respond to be calm right? Of course some black sheep of the people will take it into the next level. I might sympathy towards him but he deserve it. Don't play with a fire if you don't expect it to hurt you in return.
@@deenszxking6818 so Islam is fire? I thought so since it seems to burn everything it touches... You still seem to think that criticising and making comments about a religeon deserves violence, YOU are part of the problem, YOU are why people think Islam is not peaceful.
@@deenszxking6818 are u dumb? Violence is NEVER the answer to an attack on ur belief system
Doesn't matter how hurt u were by it
@@AyoubGhriss so you are saying that Muslims are violent and over react? Is that what you are saying? Are Muslims really so sensitive to words? So fragile?
1 The Prophet P.B.U.H did ➡ N0T ⬅ instruct us to follow any imam.
2 Allah Did ➡NOT ⬅ instruct us to follow any imam.
3 The imams did ➡ NOT ⬅ instruct us to follow them.
4 The ➡ complete & perfect ⬅ Islam existed before the arrival of all the Imams.
5 All the 4 great imams said, if you find a hadith which contradicts what we have taught you then ➡ REJECT ⬅ what we taught you and follow the teachings of Prophet P.B.U.H.
6 Are you Ready to follow an imam if it means ➡ REJECTING ⬅ a hadith 🤦🏻♂❓
Who are the 4 great imams and when did they live? When were the hadith composed?
Yes. Because we reject your imams which claim to tell us which hadith is actually from the Prophet (SAW) even though they are not certain. We follow what is certain from Allah's messenger (SAW), and for what is not certain we exercise judgement. We don't blindly follow the imams of hadith. Neither should you.
The hadithi fundamentalists created confusion around stories like the satanic verses. People like Ibn Hajar and Ibn Taymiyya gave credence to these stories unnecessarily out of blind bias for their man made methodologies. Even though this story was opposed by Qadi Iyad and Abu Bakr Ibn Arabi (according to Mufti Layth).
@@shaunshaikh8617 👍
Happy to hear
Hope muslims think like shabir ally
Bad sadly there are quite a number in millions
That think otherwise
Also take note
Some muslim majority countries, look at their blasphemy laws and laws against homosexuals
Where do you think it came from
Thin air
Definitely from Islam , one way or the other
Sad fact of life
Hope things improve
Very well said.
To many muslims are cheering
Actually, I disagree. I’m sad for the 24-year-old young man who destroyed his life over a old bigot. Not worth it.
@@nazlimerick3395
Don't you know what drived him
Guaranteed Paradise after life
Otherwise why will he
@@nazlimerick3395 all this violence comes from the esteemed vile book.
What you hypocrites think of us we don't care...I proudly support physical attacks on Blasphemers
How about people call Christian’s bibles Satanic veršes?
The true God is definately protecting this man, it is truly a miracle how he has survived all these attempts on his life, while others perished in the process. I believe God has a plan with his life.
What is the Jumhur of ulamaks opinion regarding the issue of persons insulting our Prophet? I'd rather be informed of these opinions rather than be tip toeing around the issue.
Thank you dude.
It is a shame that British Muslim Abdulla al Andalusi would not condemn the attack, actually he was supportive of it!
Come on ,"You pray for his recovery"...thats taking it too far!
No it's not. You sound like an extremist fundamentalist.
Why ¿
I think she meant let Allah guide him to straight path and Islam again. This is good dua.
I wish yesterday's speaker had the gallantry and determination as you have today. I respect other people's opinion, unfortunately there are those who die to impose theirs or others that succumb after the authoritarianism.
same
I've not even watched it yet but I know sheikh Shabir and Dr Safiyyah will always stand up for truth and justice, no matter who is wronged. God bless these scholars. They are the greatest thinkers to come out of Islamic scholarship for a long time, always rational, intelligent, and mindful of human rights. They are the _mujtahideen_ of our era. _Shukran jazeeran!_
@@jooo7011 meaning what?
According to Islam of the western not Islam that comes from quran and the sunnah
Do go on the face of this Dr. Shabbir Ally. His ides always go against the basic teachings of Islam.
Thanks for telling the truth and preaching the right course of actions.
then be proud of that person who gonna badmouth your mom in front of you,, don't hit him ever or else you will be against freedom of speech
@@jihadi-against-oppression I think you’re trying to describe your mother. You don’t have to do that. irrespective of whatever you say your mother will remain the same.
@@hayatullahrahmatzai9839 Not at all. If someone abuse my mother or the person I care for, I would make sure the abuser pay for his sins.... And Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is more above than my parents...so you expect me to listen your hypocrisy
I understand the rage of Muslims because they feel it's insulting to their beloved prophet, but this attacker could have just given this Salman Rushdie a bouquet of roses on the stage and we would have all been having a different conversation. Wisdom prevails
then be proud of that person who gonna slander or badmouth your mom in front of you,, don't hit him ever or else you will be against freedom of speech....
Instead gave that scoundrel flowers and get ready to more punches after that
Do the Hadith speak about killing for blasphemy?
They keep saying Quran is unchanged Just to cover up the mistakes like this
The mouth says "do not want"; the heart says "would like to do it". That's normal for muslims to respond. Muhammad (pbuh) says so.
Surely, this attack is a subject of condemnation. But unfortunately a politically biased condemnation is not a genuine condemnation and the biasnees is pretty obvious, I don't need to clarify it. We see when Shia countries are protecting the most oppressed Sunni people of Palestine, while most Sunni countries are eagerly making alliances with the oppressor of the Palestinian people. If you are proud of your sect go ask your brothers in Palestines. If it is inspired by such motivation, then it has another agenda which might surpass the apparent agenda. I don't have any association with any sect becuase the Prophet disassociated himself from all sects equivocally (6:159). Yet I support people of every sphere on the basis of morality and justice. Please do not pretend people will not notice it when you hide a bad thing with a good one on top of it, and Who is on above, He knows your hearts even before you express something. All the people who are saying "hallelujah" to you today, you will not find anyone of them behind you on that day but you will see your brothers standing before you!
What did she just say? Praying for Rushdie's recovery? Why don't she go and kiss his forehead and also pat him on the back for insulting her holy prophet. Rubbish!
I’m a non-muslim, and I wanted to say I very appreciate you for unequivocally denouncing the attack on Salman Rushdie. It was a shock to me, not only when Rushdie was stabbed, but when I saw dozens of posts on UA-cam videos celebrating the assault, congratulating the assailant, one even saying Allahu Akbar. So it’s a relief to me to see you so simply and unequivocally denounce the attack, and to explain why such a thing is not condoned in Islam.
I do have one disagreement. You criticized Rushdie’s book for portraying the wives of the prophet in unsavory circumstances. There is a brothel in the book in which the prostitutes take on the names of the wives of the prophet, but there is no suggestion that the wives themselves are anything but chaste. Now of course you still have every right to find this offensive and to argue it is so (and others have the right to disagree). But I think it is important to be precise in describing what one objects to. It would be important under circumstances, but it is even more-so given the anger that is out there.
But that is a small point, I appreciated very much everything else you said in this interview.
But why did you feel the need to defend the vile book Rushdie wrote? He knew what he was doing and as a former member of the creative community I think he used his talents to attack the religion of another people for bigoted reasons and then hid behind "artistic license"! I don't care which religion or people it is but to me, there is such a thing as going too far, whether it's a writer, comedian or a photographer soaking a crucifix in urine!
@@pulsarstargrave256 I don't think it's a vile book. You have every right to hold otherwise of course, but I disagree. And even if I did believe it was a vile book, I would still hold it was important to describe it accurately, when criticizing it.
@@roderictaylor I've seen interviews with this guy, he made his feelings plain for all to see and hear!
@@pulsarstargrave256 Is there an interview you found particularly offensive? If you give me a link, I'll take a look at it.
Whether they denounce or distance themselves from that act,the Fatwa is still in force and has never been withdrawn.
It is not justifyiable as Salman Rushdie horror verses need no explanation.End of discussion.
I'm not a Muslim, but I follow a number of Islamic UA-cam channels out of interest and to learn more about Islam. Since the attempted murder of Salman Rushdie, this is the first time I've heard a Muslim denounce the attack! So much of the rhetoric of other Muslims is simply disgusting and does not belong in a civilized society!
Much respect for Dr. Shabir Ally!
The question of double standards should always be the first question.
First of all it was a lone attacker! Secondly he's a shia and many sunnis do not regard shias as Muslim and others would say they are a deviant sect. The question regarding condemnation is called a loaded question and is called a fallacy of logic used to intentionally pigeonhole a responder.
Do you have to publicly condemn every crime committed by a non muslim??
Jumping on the condemnation waggon gives the false impression that crimes committed by muslims are somehow more outrageous and need a stronger or even a military response. Furthermore these same platform make very little noise when it comes to crimes committed by the west or Israel. The hypocrisy is absolutely glaring!
@@AJ-il1lm8ph7z How many logical fallacies do you have to make?!
"It was a lone attacker". So, what! Regardless of whether he was alone or not, he acted in response to a fatwa made by others.
That he is a Shia still means he's a Muslim. If Sunni Muslims think otherwise, then they should do something about overcoming their own innate bigotry and internalised Isolamophobia!
I did not question 'condemnation'. A loaded question is intended to lead the responder towards a predetermined or preferred answer. I made a statement about the condemnation of the attack: it is actually a value judgement.
That I do not have to condemn every crime committed by a white man is a red herring argument: white people can be Muslim too! The attacker is a Muslim, following a Muslim ruling, acting in line with the Shari'a (those who insult the Prophet deserve death, apparently). The issue is not race, but religion; specifically the religion of Islam (which Salman Rushdie's book satirises). Unfortunately, most outrageous crimes are committed by Muslims; from public beheadings to suicide bombings. I'd say 9/11 was pretty outrageous, wouldn't you!
As for your second (and third?) red herrings, concerning the barbarity of Western and Israeli military actions, I think you'll find that millions of us have denounced their actions. Have you forgotten about the million people who marched on Westminster, London, back in 2003 in protest against the war in Iraq? However, I agree that Western media organisations often refuse to criticise such crimes against humanity. Either they are in some way compromised, or else forced not to report anything which could be considered antisemitic! But more often than not, the same media will downplay the crimes of Muslims (the "it has nothing to do with Islam" card!).
@@jooo7011 Thanks. I may listen to Christian Prince from time to time, but as a Christian polemicist who is mainly interested in challenging Islam, he tends to keep to a very narrow band. My area of interest has more to do with linguistics and literary criticism of the Qur'an in its historical context.
@@jooo7011 Ah, yes! I tried listening to his channel a few times, but I really didn't like his style. Again, he's a Christian polemicist who focuses more on outreach to Muslims. However, he has collaborated with Al Fadi recently, and together they have produced some interesting programmes.
I don't keep a special record of UA-cam videos, but recently I've enjoyed listening to the likes of Dr. Hythem Sidky and Dr. Shady Nasser.
@@jooo7011 I appreciate that English may not be your first language, but perhaps I don't understand what you wrote in your last post.
Firstly, Hythem and Sidky are not 'my' doctors.
Secondly, they specialise in the study of manuscripts: they don't really engage in intertextuality.
A Good Tree cannot bring forth Evil Fruit
Many Christian and atheist bombs being dropped on little babies. Please check your hypocrisy. Peace.
@@elorebenyame2016
I don’t know how you do it but where Im from we read things in Context.
The Very Next Verses says
“Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Whoever does not take up their cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life for my sake will find it.”
Matthew 10:37-39
So Christ Means that there will be people that Follow him and it will cause Friction with Family members and even friends. We see that today when Many Muslims convert to Christianity and pretend to be Muslims to avoid being labeled an Apostate but once the Family finds out they have left Muhammad for Christ then there is no Peace in the Household. What a Sword does is separate, So Christ is using this word to represent what separation between his followers and those who are not. Its as Simple as that. No Hadith, No Tafsirs, No Commentaries. The Context is within the Text itself.
@@TheTruth-hc7ww Right. Is that why Christians were killing each other and everyone else for centuries until secularists put them in a cage. Perhaps you would consider and think that humanity are sinners and which is why God's anger towards us is justified, and why judgement is necessary.
@@TheTruth-hc7ww Glory be to the Holy one in Heaven, who's will shall be done. Subhanallah. You should perhaps stop making Muslims your enemy. Peace.
@@elorebenyame2016 You quoted Matthew 10:34 out of context. For some reason Muslims always quote that verse to try to make Christ in someway Violent. But Christ is only speaking metaphorically which is obvious.
I dare you to present One commentary for this verse that disagrees with me. Because you would never quote this verse if you ever read any commentary of the bible.
As Muslims we do not condone these sort of treatment for someone like Salaman Rushdie, on the other hand we vehemently condemn the act of people like Rushdie. For depicting religious figures on a bad light we do condemn him.
Freedom of speech should not cross the line to humiliate a group of people even if they are atheists.
He was broke and desperate to be famous and earn a living, he chose to use a fabricated Hadees and use names of noble people whom we hold in high esteem to portray some bad characters. He himself admits that his family was not religious and he would not know how people of faith will feel when you hurt their feelings!
Why does this matter? If someone spoke bad about Jesus, as a Christian I may be upset, but I wouldn’t resort to this measure of violence. Stabbing and issuing another to be killed is an evil and wicked reaction to have. Tolerance in a mixed society is crucial.
Rushdie's book was actually a novel - a work of fiction - even though it may have been loosely based on some Islamic scriptures. In most secular western democratic countries (where Salman Rushdie lives) it is not a criminal offence, or even illegal, to insult, cause offence, ridicule or humiliation, or even criticise anyone or anything - even in matters of religion. That is what is known as freedom of speech & expression & is also what writers use when they write novels & other works of fiction (ie "made up" stories).
Of course, any Muslims are free to be critical of that literary work if they so choose, & that right is also afforded to them under the west's freedom of speech/expression practices. What they are not permitted to do under western law, is to physically attack/assault or murder someone, because they do not like a book the person has written.
@@janburn007 Of course, it's not acceptable, punishable and abhorrent. our message is clear.
Look at India some innocent people have been lynched based on allegations of possessing beef by a mob. People's homes are being destroyed, where's the tolerance and freedom of speech, who spoke against these?
@@yazeedarafath7598 Unfortunately, not all of these matters receive publicity in the international media. Obviously where any crimes have been committed (regardless of the reason for committing those crimes & whether they are prompted by religion or not), the maximum force of the law should be brought down on people of course. There's no excuse for any community taking matters into their own hands & committing crimes in the process. The law must be upheld, even if people may not like it. And if they do not like it, they can always try to lobby to have the law changed. But taking matters into one's own hands should be punished.
I don't know what purpose the man thinks he's accomplished through attacking rushdie, whether Muslim or not! This is evil
That's wasn't evil.... Salman deserve it Alhamdulliah
Under freedom of speech/expression in most western democratic countries, the only things which are actually illegal to say are bad things which are not true about certain identified/named or identifiable individuals, who have a reputation in the public sphere - things like libel/slander - & for which people can be legally sued. Speech which encourages or incites people to commit acts of physical violence against others is also illegal. But it is not illegal to say things which simply may cause offence to some, or certain categories of people.
It should also be recognised that there are people of many different faiths in this world & Muslims should not feel that they can make everyone - even people of other faiths (or of no faith) subject to the beliefs & teachings of Islam, & therefore also subject to the various punishments of Islam. Muslims should allow people of other faiths to live according to their own beliefs, teachings, & punishments, providing they also follow the laws applicable in their own countries, where they reside.
In western countries, such laws usually do not permit assaults/physical acts of violence against others, nor murder, unless it's in self-defence because one's own life is in physical & imminent danger of being damaged/lost/destroyed. If self-defence is being claimed, then usually the rule of "like for like" is applied - meaning that the person is allowed to defend themselves using the same/similar means with which they are being attacked. For example, if someone punches a person, the victim could hit/punch the attacker back - but it may not be accepted if the victim simply took a gun out & shot dead the attacker.
So certainly, it is right to condemn the physically violent & unprovoked attack on Salman Rushdie & also to condemn the criminal who committed that attack. Let us hope that the full force of the law will be brought down upon the attacker & that he receives appropriate punishment for his crime. I think it's also necessary to condemn those many unsavoury characters who expressed their praise, support, & congratulations to the attacker for his criminal acts. Let us also hope that Mr Rushdie eventually makes a complete recovery from his injuries - although that will obviously take a very long time.
And thank you to Dr Shabir Ally for publicly coming out & condemning this atrocious & criminal attack on the life of a human being. If only many more public figures in Islam would do the same. Unfortunately, I fear we may be waiting a long time for that.
This is nonsense.
Hadi Mattar is born and raised in America. He is American. Salman Rushdie was stabbed in America. Muslims have nothing to do with this.
This guy has a mental problem. His own mother pointed that out. His father didn't want to talk to him. Not a single article mentioned the mosque he used to frequent.
Giving so much coverage for this stabbing like the rest of us don't matter.
When they cracked Muhammad Chowdhury's skull are we going to focus on the perpetrators' religion?
@@kinanlaham744 For the individual who committed this crime, the country in which it happened is not so important - they probably would have committed the same crime no matter what country they were in. What IS important though, is WHY they did it (what was their motive for doing it) - & in the case of Muslims committing such crimes, it is usually based on their religious ideology, which encourages such crimes, through the fatwa, & other teachings of the religion.
And one can easily see by all the comments on social media, that there are a large number of Muslims who support the committing of such crimes. It's very easy to claim after such a crime has been committed, that a person has mental health issues, as a sort of "excuse". Perhaps the attacker does have mental health issues (which would not be surprising) - but if that was the case, why did someone not bring it to the attention of the authorities so he could have received treatment, perhaps before committing such a crime?
But it's still possible that, even in the absence of mental health issues, he may still have committed that crime, because of the religious ideology of Islam. It would certainly have been hard for anyone not to have heard about the fatwa on the life of Salman Rushdie (assuming one was alive at that time - & perhaps even if one was not alive at that time) - no matter what country one lived in. It became very well-known about world-wide. And judging from the comments many Muslims on social media have already made about the attack on Salman Rushdie - they are in complete agreement with the criminal actions of the attacker.
Crimes that are committed in western countries by caucasian people are more often than not, not motivated by religion & the perpetrator does not usually claim to have committed the crime in the name of any religion. In most cases the person does not actually practise any religion & is often an atheist/agnostic. In most cases the perpetrator has simply been motivated by a personal grudge they may have had against their particular victim (because of some perceived unjust action the victim may have personally inflicted on them previously), or their actions may have been prompted by mental health issues (eg in the case of a totally random attack).
For example, in most of the school shootings that have taken place in the USA - the perpetrators did not claim to have done it in the name of their religion, & most were not actually practising any particular religion. The attacks were either the result of the perpetrators having a grudge against their victims (eg they may have been bullied at their school, or somehow were not accepted or did not fit in) or they had mental health issues & just decided to randomly shoot people because they had easy access to a gun & perhaps may have simply been doing a "copy-cat" type of action, after having heard about similar types of shootings in other schools.
In the case of Muhammad Chowdhury, the indications are that he was not attacked due to his religion or beliefs or anything he had done to the attackers, & that it was a random attack by a group of thugs who had been on a crime spree for some time, having recently committed other crimes. The reason why the religion of the attackers is not being focussed on, is because the criminals are obviously not motivated by a religious reason & are probably not even following any religion. It is more than likely they are atheist/agnostic. They are just out to attack & rob anyone they can.
@@janburn007 Do you work for any federal agency?
Yes, you are right the country is not important unless the person was born and *raised* in that country, as is the case with Hadi Matar. He probably would not have committed this crime if he was raised in a different country. This crime is his, no one else is responsible of this crime except him. You can not and should not blame his mother, his father, or anyone else in his community for his crime. The same applies to a crime committed by a black person.
Comments on social media are not representative of Muslims. Also, *you* can not possibly read "all comments" on social media, that's an obvious exaggeration on your side to justify blaming Muslims and their ideology. Moreover, Muslims, like everyone else, are entitled to an opinion even if you don't like it. Freedom of speech is for everyone. Still, if you see a comment that violates TOS, feel free to report it.
I'll leave checking Matar's mental health issues to professionals, they can assess his case better than you. To answer your question, perhaps his mental problem had been discussed before he committed this crime, or maybe it is a recent problem. We simply don't know enough. I have no access to his medical records, maybe you do?
Salman Rushdie knew exactly what he was doing when he mocked *Khomeini*. Rushdie wanted the publicity he received and he knew, based on his career in an advertising agency, how to maximize that publicity. No doubt it brought him the success he was looking for. Perhaps, in the future, he should consider hiring a security company. You keep insisting it is the fault of "Islamic ideology", maybe you prefer that we do like China, put Muslims in concentration camps and force them to eat pork and drink beer. Or you might suggest starting another holocaust just like the one the Jews faced in Europe. You should read about both Khashoggi, who MBS wanted him killed, and Litvinenko, who Putin had a similar wish for him. Both, unlike Rushdie, were unlucky. If you want to blame anyone, perhaps you should blame Khomeini for his "fatwa." Remember the Islamic ideology is the ideology of more than one quarter of the world's population. Khomeini's fatwas are relevant to Shias only. Shias are a tiny fraction of Muslims.
I find it a bit alarming that you limit your argument about crimes in the west to caucasians, while the majority of crimes in America are committed by blacks and hispanics. It kinda hints toward the possibility that you live[ed] in an isolated town where everyone is white.
Your statement about crimes "not being motivated by religion" in the west is a proof against your main argument. Religion is supposed to give you one strong reason why you should *not* commit a crime. An atheist does not have that reason. Sadly, crimes committed in the west for the simplest and silliest of reasons.
Your selected example for crimes in the west, school shootings. Did you read it slowly: *school* shootings. That is *children* with guns committing major crimes. But, hey, here we are talking about Rushdie and blaming two billion Muslims.
Why do you think pregnant women, in the democratic west, are forced to carry to term when the fetus is dead despite the majority of people are atheists and agnostics?
@@kinanlaham744 It does not really make any difference to what I may say - but I do actually work for a federal govenment agency.
The crime is the responsibility of the perpetrator & his personal beliefs, values & ethics. Some of those beliefs & values obviously relate to his religion & the fatwa against Salman Rushdie. The perpetrator's beliefs & ethics would be the product of his upbringing & the beliefs, including religious beliefs, that would have been taught to him by his parents & religious teachers. The country in which one is raised may not necessarily have a huge impact on one's beliefs & values, especially if one is raised with religious beliefs & values etc. It does not really make any difference what country the crime happened in - it might have happened in any country - & the fact that Salman Rushdie was visiting the US for a lecture made it a crime of opportunity for the perpetrator, who also happened to be in the US at that time too.
I do not necessarily assume that comments on social media are "representative" of the Muslim community, & obviously it's simply not possible to read all comments on social media. That's not to say though, that most people would still not be alarmed at the huge number of social media comments made by Muslims, in support of the perpetrator's attack on Salman Rushdie. I accept that Muslims are also entitled to free speech (though that does not mean it will not be criticised or challenged) & may hold a variety of differing opinions & views on the matter.
But I'm not so much interested in the views of individual Muslims, as I am in the actual teachings, beliefs, & ideology of Islam, which I have been able to get a reasonable understanding of, by simply reading the Islamic scriptures (the Quran & some of the better know & better-accepted hadiths) for myself. And from the reading of those Islamic scriptures myself, I have ascertained that Islam is not the religion of peace that we are often told it is - & some of its less peaceful teachings have helped me to understand why so many Muslims think that what the perpetrator did to Salman Rushdie, should be celebrated.
I never attempted to "assess" the perpetrator's mental health - I simply said that it was possible he may have mental health issues as some people were claiming - & that if he did have such issues, it would not be surprising. On the other hand, sometimes in criminal cases, people do claim "mental illness" as an excuse for having committed a crime, when it's not always the case. I was merely touting some of the possibilities - not attempting to assess him, & of course, I do not have access to his medical records.
I believe that given the fatwa against Rushdie, the group that brought him to America to give a lecture, should have provided better security for him if he was going to give a public lecture for them. Also, if I were Rushdie, & knowing what some Muslims are like, I probably would have worn some personal protective clothing such as stab-vest, as some of the British police do.
Many countries in the west have spoken out about the persecution of the (Muslim) Uyghurs in China & have been trying to bring pressure to bear on China, not to continue with this practice. And thanks to the publicity given to this issue by human rights organisations in the west, it is a well-known issue. However we don't hear too much about Muslim organisations in countries outside China, also lobbying China to cease their persecution of the Uyghurs. I don't really think anyone at all cares about what Muslims in western countries eat & drink - if they don't want to eat pork or drink beer, that's fine by most people in the west, & is not an issue at all. I'm well aware of what happened to Khashoggi & Litvinenko. Of course, Khomeini is certainly partly to blame for his fatwa on Rushdie & the effect it had on the perpetrator - but those who seek to carry out the fatwa through attacking &/or killing Rushdie are also to blame, because what they are doing is a criminal act & against the law of the country where Rushdie was attacked.
The reason I specifically referred to crimes committed by caucasians in my earlier example, was because I have often found that when Muslim people in particular refer to crimes being committed by people in the west - they are often really referring to crimes committed by white people of European origin - & certainly they are the majority of the population in most western countries. But of course, there are also crimes committed by people of various other ethnicities & races living in western countries. The point I was originally trying to make there was that such crimes committed in western countries are usually not motivated by any kind of religion & many people do not practise any religion at all.
If, as you say, having a religion gives people a good reason NOT to commit crimes - then it proves my above point that most of the crimes committed in the west are by people not religiously motivated & the people who do commit the crimes usually do not have any religious affiliation. Obviously atheists/agnostics do not have any religious affiliation, unless you consider both atheism & agnosticism to be some kind of religions that people practise - although most people would not consider them to be religions.
Yes, sadly, in the US, some school children who manage to get hold of guns DO commit crimes.
I did not blame 2 billion Muslims for attacking Rushdie. I did blame the ideology of the religion of Islam & some of its "less peaceful" teachings, for taking hold in the minds of some Muslims & encouraging them to commit crimes in the name of their religion. Fortunately the majority of Muslims do not take those same teachings seriously enough, to want to put them into practise by attacking/killing people. But there are definitely some who do - & they are the ones who commit crimes like attacking Rushdie.
I'm not aware of any situations in the west where pregnant women would be forced to carry dead foetuses to term. But even atheists & agnostics can sometimes hold views on some issues, which may happen to align with the views of some religious people, even though the practising religious people may still be in the minority.
@@janburn007 Which agency?
Does that mean, based on your understanding of Islam, a peaceful Muslim is not an observant Muslim?
This naturally brings a more important question, how can we trust any Muslim if, like in the case of Hadi Matar, they could suddenly become observant and start killing people because of fatwas and because of their criminal ideology?
Should Muslims be allowed to come to America?
What about American Muslims?
(Lèse-majesté)
Any person who defames or insults the king, the queen, their ancestors or their descendants can be imprisoned for up to two years in England.
Sameway if you criticise the Jewish you are called antisemite. Hence, there is always double standard when it comes Islam. However, the fact remains the true Muslims take it seriously when the Koran or the prophet, peace be upon him is insulted.
@@mohamedelmi6860 Dr Shabir Ally seems to be unaware of these double standards.
@@mohamedelmi6860 Actually, the term "Islamophobia" is probably heard far more often than the term "anti-semite" these days.
A young lady politician Nupur Sharma of the ruling party in India, the BJP, is hiding from the public for over 2 months as she is threatened with a Fatwa for beheading. This is because she simply quoted Sahih al-Bukhari 5134 in a TV debate and for nothing else. About 4 random people who expressed support for her have been killed. No doubt she will face similar consequences to Salman Rushdie when her whereabouts become known. I am wondering if this matter will interest you to make a YT video to guide the Muslim society on a righteous path.
Yes - indeed I have heard of this matter. Sadly, it seems that some Muslims are even afraid of their own scriptures/hadiths being quoted in a debate.
It’s so refreshing to have a prominent Islamic spokesman condemning the attack made in the name of Islam.
It seems that too many people misinterpret the violent versus from Qur’an and the life of Prophet Muhammad and misunderstand what Allah wants from the ummah.
Prophet Muhammad and his companions lived in a different time where the world was far more brutal and far less civilised than now.
The Qur’an and the hadiths need to be reinterpreted to suit a modern civilised world.
Thank you, Doc Ally.
Muslims should have condenm the fatwa, then but failed,
Western civilization failed Salman rushdie.
May Allah granted you hightest- Jahnah
I think you should condemn the massacre of 2 million plus Muslims by America, and other Western and coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is just one that too is condemned.... But this is for a reason ... Yet it is not acceptable as you say. But they killed millions for reason of falsehood to dominate the world. So to be fair and to be courageous you should include their condemnation every time a discussion of this nature is taken up. Westerners have no reason to condemn any such attacks on one or two individuals until they compensate the millions of Muslims killed and being killed even at this moment. They should stop such killings outright. We should keep reminding this to the world that it is the victim's right to retaliate if they keep killing innocents.
🌟🌟🌟🌕BISMINLAHI 🌟RAHMAN🌟 RAHIM 🌟ALAHUMMA SOLLY🌟 ALASAIDINA MUHAMMAD 🌟ANUR🌟 SIRAJUL 🌟MUNIR🌟 RASHID🌟 MUHAMMAD🌟 RASULLILAH 🗺🌟PBUH 🕋🌏🌎🌍
Why are comments disappearing?
Which ones?
If it is true, I must wonder why the Islamic world started to praise even if the action was wrong, while there are many ways of Shariah-Hudud ads. If true, he should be consumed in hell. May Allah have mercy on us all.
Love the showwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
His answer while in usa is correct, he must also respect the sentiment of others and respect as a Muslims we do to our prophet.
you respect others...🤣...biggest joke of all the times
😂Anyway... Who is this Bravo man known as Salman Rushdie(Please be upon him...!) who had wrote the book of "The Satanic Versers"? I mean the most top writers of the worlds Salman Rushdie(Please be upon him...!) 😂 Where is this handsome young tops & glamourous writer Salman Rushdie(Please be upon him) nowadays?😂
Are they related?
Father & daughter
©Agreed. Thank you, sir.
Let those mislems who claim to condemned Ryshfues attach leave Islam to justify their pronunciation.
Injured?lol say it blunt "stabed 15 times"
Violence only breeds violence :(
Well Said
Any referral of blasphemy in Islam,,,?
🤔Many people are born as Muslims but they have neither much knowledge of way of life and the DIN, nor understanding the Hadith, tolerance living with others as well as knowing that, there is only one judge for the wrongdoing hereafter. Why terrorising, hurting, harassing, or even killing anyone🤔?
Because Muhamad did and Muslims follow his example.
It is true that an attack on any individual by an individual whether in Muslim/Non-Muslim lands is prohibited because who gave you the authority to carry such heinous act in a foreign land where a democratic system is in place. So such attacks just amount to provocation and spreading mischief in lands and Allah is just and most forgiving.
I don’t like Shabbir continuously saying Quran says this, because in Islam we follow Quran and Saheeh Hadith so it appears that he is sugar coating Islam to western audience.
And We should pray to Allah to guide Salman to the straight path of Islam apart for him recovering from this attack.
We’ll condemn salman and all those who blasphemy the religion of Islam but shall stay in our limits to not take law into our hands whether in Muslim or non-Muslim lands
Rushdie had it coming, he shoulda known better
Why do you lie that the quran does not say kills blasphemers when we read QURAN 5:33
this is the result when gives protection to a blasphemer instead of punishing legally
Blasphemy is not illegal in most secular western democratic countries. Nor is simply causing offence to some people. There are many different religions in this world which people may choose to follow. If they choose to follow a religion other than Islam, they should not made subject to the beliefs, teachings, rules, & punishments of Islam.
You have the writer's blood on your hands muyhamedans.
Say something against LGBTQ = banned, jailed, hate spreader, bla bla bla
Say something against Prophet (SAWW) = Oh its just a freedom of expression/speech
If we are here talking about equality, lets paint everyone with same brush.. Hypocrisy at its peak
That's not actually true - many people who are critical of Islam are automatically labelled "Islamophobes" by Muslims or others in the community. People are also free to be critical of the LGBTQ community, but they will also often be labelled "homophobic" & some of the other terms you have mentioned, including being banned from some social media sites & being labelled a hate spreader.
But it's important to differentiate between the treatment that can often be dished out on social media sites, & what is actually criminal (for which one might be gaoled) or illegal. The social media sites are a law unto themselves & are often guilty of treating some contributors unfairly & even banning people unnecessarily. But we are told that nothing at all can be done about them, because they are private companies & can do as they wish in terms of regulating their users.
People can't actually be gaoled for simply speaking out against or being critical of the LGBTQ community - that's just freedom of speech/expression - & it's certainly not criminal or even illegal. Nevertheless, that won't stop some social media sites from banning people who are critical of the LGBTQ community, or calling that criticism "hate speech" - even though what has been said is not illegal. What social media may call "hate speech" is quite different from the legal definition of "hate speech".
But there are laws which protect a range of different categories of people from public & blatant discrimination when it comes to certain things in the community like employment opportunities etc. For example, employers are not allowed to discriminate against people on the basis of gender, race/ethnicity, religion, marital status, sexual orientation etc. In this regard, Muslims are also protected from discrimination based on their religion, when it comes to employment opportunities & the workplace etc.
Under the law in most western countries, Muslims have to be treated the same as anyone else, & have the same/equal rights as anyone else - including people of other religions. However, there are certain areas the law does not control - like everyone's right to things like freedom of speech/expression - including people's opinions & beliefs. It is therefore not a criminal offence nor even illegal to insult or cause ridicule or offence to others, or to be critical of other people's opinions or beliefs. These things are all possible under freedom of speech.
The law also cannot control the way society or the community in general perceives certain issues, & its overall opinions & beliefs. It's not legally possible to sue the community or society in general, for supposedly having the wrong opinions/beliefs etc - though society's views are often based around what is considered "legal" under the law in that society. At times, there may be a perception that there are some double standards in the general community. And due to the often biased nature of many social media sites, the voices of a small minority group of people may get heard over & above the voices of the majority. Unfortunately nothing can be done about that sort of thing.
Because most secular western democratic countries have traditionally & historically been Christian countries, the views of the general communities in those countries, not to mention the laws, may not always align with those of the local Muslim community, which is more than likely quite a small percentage of the population. Hence there will probably always be differences of opinion between the Muslim communities in those countries, & the general population.
Nevertheless, it is still expected that the Muslim communities in those countries would abide by the laws of those countries, even if they may not agree with them, & be subject to any punishments that the law may impose on individual Muslims when they break the law of that country. The law is applied to everyone equally - regardless of their religion or religious beliefs. No-one can claim a religious exemption for things like physical violence or murder, if it is against the law - even if it is done in the name of a person's religion.
You’re allowed to criticize LGBTQ people, muslims do this all the time & LGBT people also have a right to criticize your speech against them, notice how both groups are able to say whatever they want? Freedom of speech doesn’t mean you’re exempt from criticism, it means the right to speak, write, publish, etc. opinions without government interference.
I understand muslims being offended over their religion being criticized but that’s not an excuse to kill or hurt someone over it.
"Rage is not Islamic"
promise and warn from God,do not over transgression,the Almighty creator will punish here and hereafter Salman Rushdie or anyone to try mislead humanity from the light of God, because al Quran make own claim as original words or revelation from almighty creator so don't not blame anyone.. the claim within lot fact evidence cannot argue,
After i read al Quran i realize life is not joke anymore is serious things.. every atom of deeds will count...so do not do stupid things
respect words of God..
Remember the poets:
1. March 624: Al-Nadr bin al-Harith
2. March 624: Uqba bin Abu Muayt
3. March 624: Asma bint Marwan
4. April 624: Abu Afak
5. September 624: Kab bin al-Ashraf
6. September (?) 624: Ibn Sunayna
7. July-August 625: A One-eyed Bedouin
8. After January 630: close call for Abdullah bin Sad
9. After January 630: One of Abdullah bin Katal’s two singing-girls
10. After February 630: close call for Kab bin Zuhayr
All killed or assaulted in order of muhammad or his followers. Don't pretend if this is not islam.
This is based unreliable Hadiths which are collected two hundred and fifty years after the death of the prophet hence Hadith can’t contradict the Quran because they should confirm the Quran do your homework
@@laylaali5977 everything in islam is unreliable. And no they do not contradict with the quran. You do your homework. I did mine.
@@blackdog8771 no you didn’t there is nothing in the Quran that says people should be killed because they insult Islam or criticize rather the Quranic view is god will deal with them here after.
What about crusaders who killed millions of muslims, ate their bodies, in
n the name of Christanity? Please don't bring lame fake stories else we know your true history very well.
Allmost all of these stories are fabricated