Julie Roys Reports on John MacArthur's Lifestyle: An Analysis of Phil Johnson's Response

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 бер 2021
  • Julie Roys from The Roys Report did an article last month on John MacArthur, documenting his affluent lifestyle. While I have no problem with MacArthur's lifestyle per se, it does seem to be inconsistent with his anti-prosperity message. In this video I discuss Johnny Mac's sidekick Phil Johnson in his defense of MacArthur in recent years.
    Copeland's property donated. - www.cbsnews.com/news/on-the-r...
    MacArthur's books taken from transcripts - readingreformed.com/2019/01/1...
    Kenneth Copeland's Airport - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth...
    www.airfields-freeman.com/TX/A...
    Julie Roys' response to Phil Johnson - julieroys.com/response-phil-j...
    Roys Report on John MacArthur - julieroys.com/prosperous-life...
    Roys Report on Phil Johnson doxing Julie Roys - julieroys.com/director-of-joh...
    Copeland's donations to CFAN - www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...
    Charles Evers on John MacArthur's story - noqreport.com/2019/02/04/excl...
    Saiko Woods Interview with Julie Roys - • A Candid Conversation ...
    ***************************
    My Patreon Account - / jewandgreek
    My Blog - jewandgreek.com
    My Twitter Account - / jewandgreek
    My Facebook Page - JewAndGreek
    My Book on Word of Faith Apologetics - www.amazon.com/Defending-Fait...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 383

  • @theravennightsong
    @theravennightsong 3 роки тому +96

    Sometimes it feels as if they have made an idol out of MacArthur.

    • @claresailing
      @claresailing 3 роки тому +22

      They have.

    • @tedkijeski339
      @tedkijeski339 3 роки тому +10

      You don't say.

    • @electrowayne2918
      @electrowayne2918 2 роки тому +9

      Sometimes? If the earth were to be here In 100 years. Christians wouldn’t call themselves Calvinist but Macarthurist . Smh

    • @jojomasipa379
      @jojomasipa379 2 роки тому +3

      FACT

    • @dababy391
      @dababy391 2 роки тому +6

      There is no"feels like"...they HAVE made Macarthur an idol

  • @ManuGeorge777
    @ManuGeorge777 Рік тому +36

    I studied in Johnny Mac's seminary in India for 2 yrs. Trust me, the combination of Hyper-Calvinism, hardcore dispensationalism, and an angry hatred towards all non-cessationists, was deadly, to be mild.

    • @TruthLivesNow
      @TruthLivesNow 9 місяців тому +1

      Exactly!

    • @johnhammons679
      @johnhammons679 7 місяців тому +1

      What do you mean by deadly?

    • @michaeledwards7429
      @michaeledwards7429 7 місяців тому

      I don’t think you know what Hyper Calvinism is… it’s a specific term that is anti Christian. Hyper Calvinism is not Calvinism at all. Beginning to wonder if you did any string at Masters.

    • @lW9497
      @lW9497 6 місяців тому

      He didn't say that he went to Masters. Rather, he studied in India under the care of JMac's seminary@@michaeledwards7429

    • @1corinthians15.1-4kjv
      @1corinthians15.1-4kjv Місяць тому

      @@michaeledwards7429 It seems to me, that you are highly indoctrinated antichrist tool then: Calvinism absolutely is not Christian at all. The word Christian means follower of Jesus Christ and He dispensed a gospel for the gentile nations through Apostle Paul. Martin Luther discovered, that this gospel contains not call for works to prove our faith for salvation, as contrary the gospel for the Jews under the law of Moses. Calvinism stands firm on predestination, which means, that we are either chosen for salvation or not by God, and we can do nothing either way. That is not gospel at all! Imagine that such a man even says about himself, that he spends his time defending the true gospel of the Bible against the prosperity preachers, but he essentially preach predestination and works, and also Lordship Salvation, which essentially is the "gospel" of the Catholic church, meaning we earn our standing by bending down to our elders in the church. Do I need to say, neither predestination, being chosen for salvation or church membership as a road to salvation is mentioned in the Bible! By the way, John Calvin did not base his doctrine on the Bible alone, or at all in many cases. Just like the Catholic church, that he were first a munk in for many years, he based his doctrines and advocated for humanism, which in the understanding of that time were to incorporate Pagan wisdom into Christianity. In the case of John Calvin he were hugely fascinated by the Greek philosophers, that absolutely all were Pagans, some of them extremely vile sinners, as Sokrates essentially confessing to be a homosexual pederast, and by the way do the Bible actually warn against the philosophy and superstition of the Greeks before Christianity.

  • @allenbates4163
    @allenbates4163 3 роки тому +50

    They can dish out slander but can’t take a little truth. Interesting.

  • @debrastarr9147
    @debrastarr9147 3 роки тому +33

    I actually watched this interview because I was listening to John MacArthur occassionally, and it was the day I unsubscribed to J. Peter's simply because I thought he was sucking up to the MacArthur ministry. It was obvious J. Peter's was worshipping at the throne of MacArthur.

    • @Kelly-wj7xd
      @Kelly-wj7xd 2 роки тому +1

      Rubbish.

    • @snopure
      @snopure 2 роки тому +7

      @@Kelly-wj7xd Peters actually said that MacArthur is of a caliber that we haven't seen since the apostles. That's a pretty high pedestal there, especially for a camp that hammers the charismatics about the end of the apostolic age.

    • @Kelly-wj7xd
      @Kelly-wj7xd 2 роки тому +2

      @@snopure it's not the teacher but the way they teach the word, that should be important. Biblically correct teaching is never a problem.
      It other people's idea of who should be relevant in this culture that is the problem.

    • @lizh1988
      @lizh1988 2 роки тому

      I started watching an interview with JM, presented by JP. this was a month or so ago, right after a wave of videos about the Eileen Gray excommunication.
      Peters completely did not address the incident or JM's handling if it. He just talked about how long he was in ministry, and how dependable and innocent he is. I'm not sure the exact wording, but he was predefending JM and ignoring the current very serious issue.
      I therefore didn't watch the interview itself, this guy is a rat. He deserted anyone in his flock who needed his help. Who would trust him after what he did to Eileen Gray.

    • @louisewhite3277
      @louisewhite3277 2 роки тому +6

      It's so true. J. Peters ADORES MacArthur!!! it's sickening

  • @johndisalvo6283
    @johndisalvo6283 2 роки тому +26

    When I called out Justin Peters on this and his blatant hypocrisy, he banned me from his channel! I wear that like a badge!!
    Great video brother!!

    • @petefults5984
      @petefults5984 Місяць тому +2

      Yes, anyone that calls out what he's doing, he will ban you and delete your comments.

  • @atestring1379
    @atestring1379 3 роки тому +14

    Why can't Johnny Boy come out of his fancy houses and defend himself?

  • @CoCoFantastique
    @CoCoFantastique 3 роки тому +31

    The way Justin Peters is shaking his head in agreement with those understanding eyes is such a gas light! A family vacation home and a getaway home to write is PURE luxury. It really is insulting to the intelligence to try and convince us its not. I do think these people selling prayer cloths and other gimmicks are a wrong way to "prosper" off of the gospel but don't point fingers at people who are earning just like you just because you disagree with their doctrine.

    • @davedyer3312
      @davedyer3312 3 роки тому +6

      This reminds me of someone else who is currently in the news who went to Bangkok for months to supposedly write.

    • @apostasiaelegcho5612
      @apostasiaelegcho5612 3 роки тому +2

      It isn't when he paid little to nothing for them.

    • @CoCoFantastique
      @CoCoFantastique 3 роки тому +3

      @@apostasiaelegcho5612 luxury is having access to things that majority of people can't. It isn't always based on a dollar amount. Using your logic it is safe to say they shouldn't judge others in ministry based on what they have. They dont know how much was paid for what they have or if they were gifted these items or properties.

  • @NicoleSerreli1974
    @NicoleSerreli1974 2 роки тому +9

    A year later John macarthur is called to repent for yet another Roys report. Such a sad situation, I am so glad to see that the Lord helped Aileen so well.

  • @explodingrubberducky797
    @explodingrubberducky797 3 роки тому +50

    When Joel Osteen or some charismatic preacher has quite a large income, then there's a problem. But if its Johnny Mac, then it's ok

    • @supersmart671
      @supersmart671 3 роки тому +9

      there is a difference between christians being prosperous and the prosperity Gospel. The later is no Gospel at all! Prosperity Gospel is dangerous, I stand with MacArthur in condemnation of it.

    • @atestring1379
      @atestring1379 3 роки тому +12

      @@supersmart671 MacArthur is the one that preaches a false gospel.

    • @DiscerningSpirits
      @DiscerningSpirits 3 роки тому +6

      @@atestring1379 If you seriously believe that, then you are either confused or you just hate Macarthur.

    • @apostasiaelegcho5612
      @apostasiaelegcho5612 3 роки тому +4

      He doesn't receive a large income. $200k annual salary is not considered "large" in California.

    • @explodingrubberducky797
      @explodingrubberducky797 3 роки тому +5

      @@apostasiaelegcho5612 I just checked, and the mean salary in california is around $65,000. And McArthur is making around $200,000. How many people in his church make close to that amount? I'll tell you it's probably fewer than that

  • @Tigerex966
    @Tigerex966 2 роки тому +15

    This was extremely well presented, and gave MacArthur almost every benefit of the doubt, so it was more than fair.
    Thanks Again.

  • @Patrick-sb2sb
    @Patrick-sb2sb 5 місяців тому +4

    Perhaps McAuthur and J.P. should pull the telephone pole out of their eye, then they could perhaps see clearly enough to pick the splinter out of the eye of Copeland and Osteen.

  • @lesmore7
    @lesmore7 3 роки тому +8

    Nobody does the deep in-depth research to help bring balance to these situation like you do. This is “down-load-able” classic to save...Thanks, Jew and Greek/Rod Saunders

  • @INFJPhilosopher
    @INFJPhilosopher 3 роки тому +33

    John MacArthur is the most overrated pastor in the United States.

    • @claresailing
      @claresailing 3 роки тому +5

      Yup.

    • @colleenjohnstoncomedy3036
      @colleenjohnstoncomedy3036 3 роки тому +9

      I’ll listen to Tim Keller any day any time. He’s a scholar and a gentleman. JM is a proud grouch who has no accountability

    • @deniimacdougall
      @deniimacdougall 3 роки тому +7

      No doubt about that! And don't forget his sycophants like Todd Friel, Justin Peters and his special sock puppet Phil Johnson!!

    • @LillyMarzSheps
      @LillyMarzSheps 3 роки тому +7

      He comes off as so arrogant to me. Maybe it's just me. I didn't even know what Calvinism was until the past year or so. I just knew he rubbed me the wrong way.

    • @colleenjohnstoncomedy3036
      @colleenjohnstoncomedy3036 3 роки тому +4

      @@LillyMarzSheps read Julie Roy’s report or listen to the interview with a man who was VP of his seminary. It’s unreal. He’s been pointing fingers with ride accusation all the while 3 are pointing back at him

  • @theobjectivebeliever
    @theobjectivebeliever 3 роки тому +14

    I know it’s become a scriptural cliche, but I think Matthew 7:1-2 fits here, nicely. Just one more reason not to judge too quickly or harshly.

    • @jonathandavid9720
      @jonathandavid9720 3 роки тому +1

      Yes, it appears the Matt 7:2 boomerang has struck.

  • @luigidibenedetto338
    @luigidibenedetto338 3 роки тому +13

    and Kenneth E. Hagin lived among the people and not in an exclusive or gated estate in Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • @pamj698
    @pamj698 2 роки тому +4

    Being wealthy is not a sin. Teaching the prosperity gospel is a sin and in direct opposition to Jesus’ teachings. These are 2 totally different things.

    • @JewandGreek
      @JewandGreek  2 роки тому +4

      There is no Prosperity Gospel. There is the gospel, and then there is prosperity theology. The critics blend the two so that they can condemn people they disagree with. This is despicable in my opinion. Prosperity is All Through the Bible. That is indisputable. So instead of sitting down like adults and discussing what the Bible says, we end up with one camp condemning the other camp rather than the two camps coming together to further the kingdom of God.

  • @KentuckyGirl
    @KentuckyGirl 3 роки тому +13

    I appreciate that you took your time after the story came out to really get your thoughts together and researched it. It really shows in this video.🕊

  • @disproveofthis
    @disproveofthis 3 роки тому +17

    It's amusing that they say the UNFORGIVEABLE SIN is that They were accusing Jesus that the miracles that he was performing were of the devil when they say the same accusation to many who profess that Jesus has healed them in modern times. WOW scary stuff !!

    • @agnesr.4664
      @agnesr.4664 3 роки тому +6

      Right?! I was just thinking the same thing! The fear of the Lord just hit me and now I want to even more make sure to honor whatever great and amazing thing the Holy Spirit is doing - even if it is really offending my understanding - as long as people are changed into Christ-likeness, I know who is responsible for that. 😍

    • @disproveofthis
      @disproveofthis 3 роки тому +5

      @@agnesr.4664 if we want to know if it is Jesus then we look to what he did when he walked on the earth. He is the same Jesus with the same character. If things line up with his character then all good. If they don't then it is not him and we need to avoid. Be blessed.

    • @sebastianholte-mancera1253
      @sebastianholte-mancera1253 2 роки тому +1

      I do agree what he does is bad, however, I don’t believe the unforgivable sin is possible today, because my friend is so spiritually mature, believes in gifts and loves Jesus so much and he used to be one of those people.

  • @ralphdsouza8823
    @ralphdsouza8823 3 роки тому +6

    Nice video. Keep up your sincere unbiased work. God bless from Mumbai India.

  • @WilliamBranhamsermons
    @WilliamBranhamsermons 3 роки тому +1

    your channel has many up and down things but best thing is that your continuously providing inf.

  • @lightlover33
    @lightlover33 3 роки тому +9

    I believe it is straight-up deceit for Phil to claim he makes these judgments based on lifestyle. What does Phil actually know, really, about the lifestyle of those he slanders? The truth? If a leader holds to virtually any element of theology underscoring Biblical teaching on prosperity, John, Justin, and Phil consider this license to accuse any such person of perverting the gospel with monetary greed. THIS is why they accuse with a sense of entitlement and impunity, not any objective analysis of a lifestyle.

    • @michaeledwards7429
      @michaeledwards7429 7 місяців тому +1

      Umm slander means you are saying something that is not true against someone else. Though Mac preaches against prosperity gospel (which is void of the cross and claims that God wants you healthy wealthy and happy while taking the last dollar of little old ladies because of the “sow a seed” crap) slander would be that those things he is saying is untrue. That’s not the case, they are guilty of that message. Mac does not take little old ladies last Dollars playing off their feelings and desperation.

    • @JewandGreek
      @JewandGreek  2 місяці тому

      @@michaeledwards7429 You're conflating prosperity theology with soteriology, a common error in the discernment crowd. One can hold to prosperity theology and still have a soteriology that is mainstream evangelical. As for taking money from little old ladies (or men, or anybody else), how do you know the financial condition of everybody who has donated to Johnny Mac or any other minister? You don't.

  • @kuntu1943
    @kuntu1943 3 роки тому +7

    Thank you so much Sir for what you do. God bless you.

  • @helgeevensen856
    @helgeevensen856 3 роки тому +9

    spot on video.... my observation over the years is that often reformed guys defend reformed guys... this is, i believe, the heart of the issue most of the time... simply on the basis that they are fellow calvinists, they are defending each other.... reformed theology seems to be the deciding factor most of the time... they may criticize each other on some minor theological point, but as long as you are "reformed", you will never be called a heretic that is leading people to hell... of course, that's a broad brush, and will not apply in all cases... thanks, God bless... :-))

  • @20kevron
    @20kevron 3 роки тому +7

    Happy you addressed this.

  • @brentlammjr3701
    @brentlammjr3701 3 роки тому +6

    I really don’t see how having stuff would make anyone a lover of money.....Do the people worship God or the money? Who do they consider the source of their blessings?

    • @jonathandavid9720
      @jonathandavid9720 3 роки тому +7

      True, Having stuff doesn't make one a lover of money. Here we see Jmac accusing others of "Having stuff" while he also "Has stuff." Very telling of his blind presumption. How does he know the ministers he accuses don't also give large to God's work?
      Lesson to Jmac: Stay in your own lane and don't be such a busy- body criticizing Gods other servants.

  • @onesimustim8424
    @onesimustim8424 3 роки тому +11

    The mark of the beast can not be taken in ignorance.
    It is not a MARK that is the issue - the taking of THE mark comes with worship of the beast.

  • @leedatsit1799
    @leedatsit1799 3 роки тому +4

    I don't even object to the criticism of doctrinal issues. We need to do this, and should. But to just completely trash everything about someone or apply more than gently poking fun. Ridicule is best demonstrated on those who use it themselves for the sole purpose of deterrence in my opinion.
    Rod, this gave me some new information about a couple ministries that I didn't know.
    I appreciate that, and I think it just shows that we need to be less quick to rush to sentencing someone.
    Judgement I have no problem with, because I don't conflate it with sentencing/condemnation and never have.
    Judgement determines whether we err or not. It's during the sentencing phase of a trial that the person's degree of knowledge, intent, and other factors are weighed.
    In Christianity we always offer a plea deal. It's known as repentance, and only after it's rejected a couple times is an opinionative person (the meaning of the word "heretic") to be left alone.
    Of course, we must have absolute knowledge of their guilt as well, not just gossip, and I think this video does a fine job of showing how easily the devil can mislead us.
    I have to say, while I don't always agree with your conclusions, I have immense respect for your methodology, and sense of fair play.
    Keep up the sound work.

  • @marcuscurtismusic
    @marcuscurtismusic 3 роки тому +6

    "Let another praise you and not your own mouth".....Instead, make up sensational stories about road trips the day Martin Luther was murdered. The hypocrisy of these heretic hunters knows no boundaries. It is obvious that they are not offended by prosperity. Their real offense is any real move of the Holy Spirit. They just use prosperity as an excuse to go after other doctrines like healing, speaking in tounges, Word of knowledge, or any other event that involves a supernatural move of the Holy Spirit. That is the thing that really offends them. At least this has been my experience.

  • @Liminalplace1
    @Liminalplace1 3 роки тому +2

    Rod, as usual your very gracious in rebuttals. It's probably the better approach. My own assessment of Jonny Mac is that he's not fully converted)

  • @stewmeat92
    @stewmeat92 2 роки тому +2

    John macarthur still believes u can take the mark of the beast and still be saved, about 10 years back someone asked Phil to ask Mr MacArthur does he believe you can still take the mark of the beast and still be redeemed and Phil put out a statement that Macarthur still stands on what he said in the 70's that if you take the mark u still can be saved.

  • @time2discern631
    @time2discern631 Рік тому +2

    There is something wrong with a preacher/pastor who has 3 homes, a multi-millionaire as a CHRISTIAN, esp. when he rails against the lifestyles of the Word of Faith preachers. Millions more could be given to help the poor, vulnerable, etc. THAT is referred to multiple times in the Bible. Acts 2 & 4 shows the church doing just that. The second century church (though starting to go off-base) does continue this New Testament practice.

  • @claresailing
    @claresailing 3 роки тому +11

    Johnson: (in a soft, kind, earnest voice) "blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah...". Peters with that pious Peters look on his face, nod nod nod nod nod nod nod...

  • @TheBelovedDisciple144
    @TheBelovedDisciple144 3 роки тому +8

    Yeah, I sorta kinda knew MacArthur was living just as prosperously in material possessions as the ministers he rebukes. Kinda goes with the territory when your net worth is on par with those same ministries.

  • @Tigerex966
    @Tigerex966 3 роки тому +6

    Great insight, you forgot however to include his "The Blood Of Jesus Does Not Save Anyone" remarks.

    • @JewandGreek
      @JewandGreek  3 роки тому +3

      They didn't cover that in the discussion. In fairness to Johnny Mac that's not exactly what he said. ua-cam.com/video/NkEFZv5UZ7s/v-deo.html

    • @Tigerex966
      @Tigerex966 2 роки тому +2

      @@JewandGreek I know his excuse is always semantics or exact words, his actual comments and response to criticism and website post, were even worst IMHO than the paraphrase I posted.
      I was being kind.
      You can still find most of it online still.
      I almost came to the conclusion that gcc and MacArthur would never apologize for anything, I was wrong they were eventually forced to give credit to an author for a chapter in one of their books that was apparently stolen,.
      They denied it but years later blamed it basically on a clerical mistake, and did a half apologize, not for their false statements before but for a clerical mistake, which was basically not because of them.
      Actually he said essentially the same thing, here he is.
      ua-cam.com/video/ci0ScJxMpl4/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/EPwiLPJkVkM/v-deo.html

  • @Patrick-sb2sb
    @Patrick-sb2sb Рік тому +3

    So apparently, making money and having fine things is O.K. for Justin Peter's friends. But if you're a charismatic, like Copeland or Osteen, you're a greedy money grubber, a devil, lost, and going to hell. (BECAUSE JUSTIN SAYS SO)!

  • @thesmiffers
    @thesmiffers 3 роки тому +8

    Once again, Rod, you cover the topic well from an angle I have not seen from others. One interesting fact that is not brought out in the video, though, is when Phil Johnson brags about MacArthur's joy in turning down the ability to receive a dime for each sermon broadcast, he fails to reveal that for MacArthur have received it would be a violation of IRS rules; it's not actually a sacrifice on anyone's part. Anyway, I think this is not going away anytime soon. We'll see.

    • @JewandGreek
      @JewandGreek  3 роки тому +4

      Thanks for pointing that out, Jerry. I guess your experience with 501c3 laws is behind that observation.

  • @allenbates4163
    @allenbates4163 3 роки тому +12

    These heresy hunters don’t make all these videos with love as their motive. Thanks for your work Rod.

  • @colleenjohnstoncomedy3036
    @colleenjohnstoncomedy3036 3 роки тому +11

    What a life Phil has. Spend it spinning a web to try and cover for JM. He must be really empty on the inside.

    • @CoCoFantastique
      @CoCoFantastique 3 роки тому +9

      He seems like such a henchman. It's saddening. The whole explanation of him doxing the woman was so awful. He should have publicly repented instead of justifying. Even if that wasnt his intent there was harm caused and you repent for that. The fact that he chose to justify it says A LOT.

    • @KJ-lb4tj
      @KJ-lb4tj 3 роки тому +2

      @@CoCoFantastique those with narcissistic tendencies have no empathy and can never put themselves in others shoes nor do they want to. They have no desire to know what impact they have on others or learn from their mistakes

    • @CoCoFantastique
      @CoCoFantastique 3 роки тому +1

      @@KJ-lb4tj unfortunate but true

  • @sadiebenson1888
    @sadiebenson1888 3 роки тому +5

    You have the best video out here on this topic, and you have made very good points.
    Yet John Maccarthurs supporters still keep defending him, I do not see how they cannot see that Phil is not being honest in this interview. The teaching on the taking the mark of the beast,alone, makes these men false teachers. I have tried to warn his followers and they say that I do not know how to read the bible,and have called me a liar,for saying exactly what the scriptures say, that those who take the mark will have their part in the lake of fire with Satan. And they have all said that John and Phil say that it is a forgiveable sin. They are trusting man over Gods word. Even a third grader could read those verses,and know that if they take it,it will damn them to hell.
    Thank you for making this video.

    • @saulespino2510
      @saulespino2510 2 роки тому

      But as long as you are alive and repent of taking the mark will God forgive you? He sure will.

  • @elroyswarts513
    @elroyswarts513 6 місяців тому +3

    The MacArthur worship is off the chain. These people are seriously trapped in a cult. That is why they will bend over backwards to defend or justify John Calvin burning Michael Servetus at the stake, but someone like Joyce Meyer preaching the gospel is where they draw the line. Also, what does defending yourself against accusations have to do with praising yourself?
    "With the measure that you measure, it shall be measured back to you."

  • @lr6844
    @lr6844 2 роки тому +4

    We all sin because we have a fallen nature but the Bible teaches in the King James Bible...James 3:1 "My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation." In other words, teachers, preachers, etc. will be held more accountable by the Lord if they teach false doctrine and are not of good example to their listeners.

  • @thewaymissionalministries
    @thewaymissionalministries 3 роки тому +12

    This video was amazing 😻. So amazing I had to share with Justin Peters. Really great 👍 job.

    • @ryanpmcp
      @ryanpmcp 2 роки тому +1

      Did he say anything about it??

  • @lightlover33
    @lightlover33 3 роки тому +10

    "Well compensated interference runner and head cheerleader..." LOL

  • @GaryGilesthevoice1
    @GaryGilesthevoice1 3 роки тому +4

    thanks for the facts Rod

  • @luigidibenedetto338
    @luigidibenedetto338 3 роки тому +2

    Warren Buffet lived in the same house over sixty years and he is one of the richest person in the world. Grow up Phil and Justin. Justin moved several time throughout his life, ask him

  • @WilliamBranhamsermons
    @WilliamBranhamsermons 3 роки тому +2

    very nice information

  • @debrastarr9147
    @debrastarr9147 3 роки тому +1

    It states in the book of Daniel: if you receive the required mark during the mark of the beast there is no repentance. I did not write it.
    It does not matter who comments differently than the book of Daniel whether John MacArthur or another preacher what they are saying is not the truth and what the Bible states.
    THERE IS NO REPENTANCE IF YOU RECEIVE THAT MARK .
    This is why many who are not saved will have to give their lives for Christ during this time.

  • @jarednel
    @jarednel 3 роки тому +21

    Absolute GOLD!!! 🏆😎👍
    This is one of your best roasts yet, Rod. Well researched, clearly presented, and on point! 🎯
    Excellent work! 😉👑

  • @kellymiller4228
    @kellymiller4228 11 місяців тому +1

    It is very sad to see those who attack another group in such a vicious way, even though reproval should be given Out in many of these situation’s. For years I have viewed Justin peters, Rob Johnson, and Todd Friel as nothing more than puppets to John MacArthur. I asked myself do these men not know that they are going to stand before Almighty God and give an account for what they are doing? I appreciate how Rod has handled dealing with the situation, even though I disagree with some of the things that he has stated. As we know Jesus said in Matthew chapter 6 versus 19 through 21 that we are not to lay up treasures on earth… And then he goes on to say that where our treasure is there will our heart be also. It does not matter if it is Kenneth Copeland, Joel Osteen, or John MacArthur, It does not matter if you are charismatic, Pentecostal, or Presbyterian, this is an actual command from our Lord and it does not matter who you are or what geographical area you live in. Our culture has so influenced our life and even the life of those who are in the pulpit, that we can see greed on every hand in the world and the church. I guess John MacArthur thought he would get him a piece of the American gospel just to see what it taste like. Enough said.

  • @loonhaunt
    @loonhaunt 3 роки тому

    I don't follow women pitbulls or you, but this is too sweet to miss. Makes a sunshiny day even better.

  • @barrigudo00
    @barrigudo00 3 роки тому

    A cabine in the woods with several bedrooms. Nice "cabine"

  • @bryanadriel6036
    @bryanadriel6036 Рік тому +2

    The Lord gives and takes away

  • @kenfardoe5646
    @kenfardoe5646 3 роки тому +7

    Great video! So much hypocrisy.

  • @bigtombowski
    @bigtombowski 2 роки тому

    Reading the auto generated c.c. 'Reinhardt Monkey' cracks me up.

  • @kevinevans8892
    @kevinevans8892 3 роки тому +11

    Thank you man of God. I agree with you on this wholeheartedly. And I hope Justin Peters and Phil Johnson will leave the prosperity gospel preachers alone after this expose. Thank you for such a great presentation.

  • @charlynesimms9451
    @charlynesimms9451 Місяць тому

    So U only Read the Bible nite and day only? How did he have time to write 150 books?

  • @garyleuba3036
    @garyleuba3036 3 роки тому +7

    No! The book of Revelation is plain that all who take the mark of the beast are damned!

  • @kiimbel1877
    @kiimbel1877 3 роки тому +6

    MR. SAUNDERS KEEP UP THE EXCELLENT WORK!!! 👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿

  • @caliomaston42418
    @caliomaston42418 3 роки тому +9

    I guess Solomon was a lover of money also And David and any number of many others. Poverty doesn't make you holy nore does money.

    • @explodingrubberducky797
      @explodingrubberducky797 3 роки тому +5

      That wasn't the point. The point was that there is a double standard. They come against charismatic preachers who may be well off, calling them all sorts of names, but they can't do the same with John McArthur. This stinks of hypocrisy

    • @Tigerex966
      @Tigerex966 3 роки тому +1

      Solomon had other problems like worshipping other Gods, he inherited his wealth, at least a lot of it.

    • @kiimbel1877
      @kiimbel1877 3 роки тому +1

      @@Tigerex966 SEE 1 KINGS 3:1-14. GOD TOLD SOLOMON ASK FOR WHATEVER HE WANTED, AND ALL SOLOMON ASKED GOD FOR WAS THE WISDOM TO RIGHTEOUSLY JUDGE GOD'S PEOPLE, ISRAEL. SINCE GOD WAS PLEASED WITH SOLOMON'S REQUEST, NOT ONLY DID GOD GIVE SOLOMON WHAT HE ASKED FOR (WHICH WAS WISDOM), BUT GOD ALSO GAVE SOLOMON WHAT HE DIDN'T ASK FOR (WHICH WERE RICHES, AND HONOR). SINCE GOD GAVE SOLOMON RICHES IT MUST HAVE BEEN GOD'S WILL FOR SOLOMON TO HAVE RICHES. LATER ON SOLOMON USED THE RICHES TO BUILD ALTARS TO WORSHIP THE "GODS" OF THE FOREIGN (PAGAN) WOMEN THAT HE HAD MARRIED. AND THAT WAS HIS DOWNFALL. THE POINT IS THAT SOLOMON DID NOT ASK GOD FOR WEALTH, BUT GOD GAVE HIM WEALTH ANYWAY!

  • @Jlmoore168662
    @Jlmoore168662 4 місяці тому +1

    The scary part of these cessationist is that they hate women and they have no love in their hearts for people

  • @kathyjolicoeur6876
    @kathyjolicoeur6876 3 місяці тому

    Love to see pictures of McArthurs homes.

  • @colleenwood5951
    @colleenwood5951 3 роки тому +11

    Great job. John MacArthur needs new spokes people. Either they are too lazy to fact check or they don’t expect the listeners to fact check. They never seem to know the details of what they are talking about.

  • @daisywade2449
    @daisywade2449 2 роки тому

    Like Jesus said to Peter when Peter asked what Jesus was going to do with the Apostle John:
    “If I Want him to remain till I return, what is that to you”?
    Don’t know who “appointed “ this lady to go around snooping on people’s life!! IF the Lord has allowed those Pastors to be wise with the money they make , what is it to anybody how they spend it??
    “With the same measure we use it will be measured back to us”...
    Praying for our enemies..

  • @toddgreve6587
    @toddgreve6587 2 роки тому +1

    Truth?

  • @sthehadebe6064
    @sthehadebe6064 3 роки тому +11

    Keep up the great work brother Rod.

  • @garyleuba3036
    @garyleuba3036 3 роки тому +5

    Doxing someone is a lowdown thing to do!

  • @PatrickLeak
    @PatrickLeak 3 роки тому +4

    Looks like JP don’t listen to his on counseling lol The first to present his case seems right Proverbs 18:17

  • @lionking5687
    @lionking5687 3 роки тому

    Amen

  • @abcdefghijklmnop514
    @abcdefghijklmnop514 2 роки тому +1

    Phil Johnson, never heard of this guy but talk about being out of touch of reality and this reformed movement creative a golden calf out of John McArthur. Just like prosperity sells so does harsh and strong takes as we see with McArthur and the reformed movement.
    The dude interviewing Phil was basically a McArthur fan boy. Talk about taking verses out of context. Their aint nobody there to sing his praise. People want clarification on his positions biblical and personal. Him sending his water boy out iron out his dirty laundry only speaks volumes to what a celebrity pastor, mega church culture he probably has but preaches against.
    It made John happy that they stopped charging for sermons? On top of taking a salary for like literally everything he has his hands in. Royalties from books he doesn’t write and you want us to thing he’s humble?

  • @bordendonna
    @bordendonna 8 місяців тому +2

    Calvinists seem to walk in a grand entitlement…very sad. A very strong self-will.

  • @johnmorganjr769
    @johnmorganjr769 2 місяці тому

    Interesting channel !! Ill hang out !! 🙏 💯 👍

  • @1love1hope1faith
    @1love1hope1faith 4 місяці тому +1

    This was really well done!
    Sound like someone is trying to take a speck out of someone else eye but has a log in his own! The very thing we try to correct in someone else is the very thing that we end up doing! That’s why the Bible says to be careful! Money can be a trap for everyone! And who charges for a mp3 download?!

  • @josephchadwell2786
    @josephchadwell2786 2 роки тому +1

    Unbelievable the Bible was very specific on taking the Mark Of The Beast. It is a requirement to participate in the beast system which means you are given a choice and if you decide to take it then you CAN NOT REPENT.

  • @dababy391
    @dababy391 2 роки тому

    I do believe he has 5 houses, last count

  • @sadiegriffith5024
    @sadiegriffith5024 2 роки тому +1

    Exactly talking about talk the walk and walk the talk. Calling others prosperity when he actually lives the same lifestyle..hypocrite

  • @20kevron
    @20kevron 3 роки тому +5

    Lol I love the Kenneth Copeland comment

  • @1950Dara
    @1950Dara 2 роки тому

    This isn't about money it's about John MacArthur's truth they're going after

    • @JewandGreek
      @JewandGreek  2 роки тому +4

      The truth is he earns over $500K a year from multiple revenue streams and owns three houses, and yet he condemns Joel Osteen who hasn't taken a salary since 2005. Another truth is he teaches unbiblical doctrines like Lordship Salvation and Limited Atonement.

    • @lizh1988
      @lizh1988 2 роки тому +2

      @@JewandGreek And he publicly despises those who speak in tongues.

  • @louisewhite3277
    @louisewhite3277 2 роки тому +1

    MacArthur also pops off with off-color comments about others, unashamedly...as he's THE authority! MacArthur needs to be taken aside by true spirituals and shown the right way more excellently.

  • @Jlmoore168662
    @Jlmoore168662 4 місяці тому

    Man the way they speak about John is as if they worship him. The way they say his name John....

  • @thehoogan5923
    @thehoogan5923 3 роки тому +3

    I don’t care if a preacher has nice houses and a large income if they got it legally but J-Mac does apparently.. hypocrisy thy name is Grace To You!!

  • @driesvzyl143
    @driesvzyl143 2 роки тому +1

    God hates unequal scales - once again Rod - without a doubt - logically exposes hypocritical judgment

  • @Hicky33
    @Hicky33 3 роки тому +1

    Charismatics agree with everyone that the Bible does not forbid anyone of being rich. So if the main point here is John having a lifestyle that resembles those who they criticize of making money off the gospel is invalid.
    I think it depends on how "lifestyle" is defined as lived out by the person.
    Is it a rich lifestyle that is ligitimately and faithfully earned by hard work in a salary that is not demanded or one that is gained out of the person's preference of first class treatment ala John Bevere, or the preaching that healing and prosperity is guaranteed on the cross that there are ways to "unlock" them through "seed faith money" or through obedience to Christ, especially through tithes that by not regularly giving tithes actually is robbing of God, or the selling of self-help materials by church leaders which tells believers that there are ways or secrets to discovering a prosperous life in living out their Christian life?
    I'm not defending John Mac, I just think there has to be a better argument when doing videos on this particular issue for their happy viewing that should give them a serious check.

  • @rodbrown8306
    @rodbrown8306 6 місяців тому

    Trouble with what you say is that it's slander!

  • @Patrick-sb2sb
    @Patrick-sb2sb Рік тому

    John was trying to dodge and dart in case a once saved always saved calvanist takes the mark; that calvanist, of course, would be able to repent, or calvanist theology on the subject is SHOT!!

  • @Psalm_27.4
    @Psalm_27.4 Місяць тому

    Please know that you can tell the truth about someone and still be slandering them. Slander is not always false. It can be telling the truth about someone that is shameful or embarrassing before you talk to them about it, or to someone who has no authority to solve the issue that you’re bringing up.

  • @supersmart671
    @supersmart671 5 місяців тому

    Measuring MaAcrthur's fruit against the likes of Joseph Prince, Kenneth Copeland, Joyce Meyer is ridiculous 😢 is it not?

  • @Psalm_27.4
    @Psalm_27.4 Місяць тому

    Well, I guess that King David and his son, King Solomon, were prosperity kings.

  • @lindamcclellan8434
    @lindamcclellan8434 3 роки тому

    Didn’t really understand this one.

  • @debrawehrly6900
    @debrawehrly6900 2 роки тому

    I never liked John Mac Arthur because of the disrespect toward Beth Moore by telling her to "go home."

  • @nancybenson1951
    @nancybenson1951 29 днів тому

    Good for Michael Brown. Glad he spoke out.

  • @kelrogers8480
    @kelrogers8480 7 місяців тому

    You'd rather hear him say: "I own 3 houses, so what?" No you wouldn't rather have that, and you certainly would not be content with it as an answer. Who's doing the BS-ing here, exactly?

  • @michaelares4240
    @michaelares4240 2 роки тому

    Who cates

  • @ivanjimenez7722
    @ivanjimenez7722 Місяць тому

    Is your ministry basically bashing other members of the church family?

  • @matematicaconsentido11235
    @matematicaconsentido11235 29 днів тому

    honestly i have no problem with Macarthur having three houses or making millions of dollars as an author, sorry but no, i do have a problem with all that. Thank you for this great video. It exposes a side of MacArthur which is dark, no doubts.

  • @nancybenson1951
    @nancybenson1951 3 місяці тому

    I would like to believe that you could repent for taking the mark. Not for myself because I won’t take it, but I have a whole family that is unsaved including children and grandchildren and great grandchildren. Lord have mercy on them. But I thank you very much for your exposition and generally agree with you.

  • @MrMurfle
    @MrMurfle 3 роки тому +1

    Is J Mac worldly rich beyond the wildest dreams of all but a very few on the planet? Apparently yes!
    And these spin doctor defenders do nothing to dispel that conclusion.
    Are J Mac's worldly riches compatible with Jesus's teachings on riches, wealth, earthly treasures, and greed? Definitely, No! End of story.

  • @louisewhite3277
    @louisewhite3277 2 роки тому +2

    MacArthur preaches A LOT of unbiblical things, some are good & biblical, but so much is not. He only preaches what he personally believes, not the whole counsel of God!!! Furthermore, MacArthur seems to be a tad arrogant. He is articulate, and well spoken, but unfortunately unbiblical in the doctrines he preaches.

  • @larrymillikan3969
    @larrymillikan3969 2 роки тому +1

    You’re logic is off. Two people can have the exact same luxuries and it is possible one be a lover of money and one not be. Having nice things doesn’t equal lover of money.
    Prosperity preachers solicit money from people in order to “sow a seed” and other bible passages taken out context and full blown heresy. Things which you cannot accuse McArthur of.

    • @JewandGreek
      @JewandGreek  2 роки тому +4

      John MacArthur has condemned Joel Osteen and Osteen takes no salary but John MacArthur has taken two or three salaries in addition to his book royalties. My logic is not off there. MacArthur employs a double standard when it comes to Joel Osteen.

    • @larrymillikan3969
      @larrymillikan3969 2 роки тому +1

      @@JewandGreek Yes it is. You’re throwing out there teaching with it. Which Joel Osteen himself considers himself more of a motivational speaker than a preacher. Not to mention the heresy he teaches and shear ignorance of how to teach the Bible. JMac has solid teaching and the life to back it. I’m saying to you though that two people can have the exact same things and one have it in faith (Job) and the other be a lover of money. So material things aren’t the factor of how to judge but the heart disposition is. They best way to know that is actions and words and the words of prosperity preachers speak for themselves as well as their actions.

    • @JewandGreek
      @JewandGreek  2 роки тому +5

      @@larrymillikan3969 Joel Osteen affirms all of the essentials of the faith and therefore is not a heretic. John MacArthur teaches lordship salvation which is borderline works based salvation. He also teaches limited atonement and the doctrines of Grace, which come from Augustinian Platonism. MacArthur's theology is much more problematic than Osteen's.

  • @clellaadams
    @clellaadams 7 місяців тому

    H Y P O C R I T E LOL

  • @kaishiden4586
    @kaishiden4586 6 місяців тому +1

    John macarthur condemned joel osteen but john macarthur's net worth is $14,000,000. HYPOCRITE!