One can only imagine how much more effective this would be in a fighter designed from scratch with no pilot requirements - life support, safety & ejection systems, physical controls and restrictions on tolerance of G-forces.
You mean Australia Ghost Bat lol. kind of show how far USA is behind in this technology as use a human piloted jet instead of building a purpose built AI drone from scratch like Australia did. Also they still had a pilot in the cockpit as seem to not trust the AI.. Ghost Bat does not even have joysticks to control it.. no human can fly or operate it, even Turkey Khizelman has joysticks.
@@nedkelly9688 Ghost Bat is indeed cool technology, and nice to see it developed in Australia too. I think its also a matter of design. If you design something from the ground up to not have a pilot onboard; then you can do a lot that would be otherwise not possible. Retro-fitting an F-16 and keeping it airborne is probably not as simple as we imagine. I dont see anything wrong with having someone onboard... presumably they still have a better chance of bringing it back i n one piece if something goes wrong - and I doubt anyone really wants to see it turned to scrap if it can be avoided.
@@nedkelly9688 I believe the US's purpose of AI research is to integrate it within existing platforms, not design a whole airframe from the ground up. And it should be noted that the ghost bat is being developed by boeing.
@JonathanHerman-xz6zc incorrect. There are plenty of cases of AI producing unexpected outcomes, wit the ai coming up with solutions that developers still don't understand how it got from point a to b.
@JonathanHerman-xz6zc “Unexplainability and Incomprehensibility of Artificial Intelligence.” a paper by Roman V. Yampolskiy. Elon Musk has also spoken on this on rogans podcast
@JonathanHerman-xz6zc I just sent you a paper that I was put onto my watching elon on Rogan a few years ago. I'm not an AI scientist or developer so, no I dont have any personal examples for you. I guess we'll see how well my original comment ages........
The F-62 is a remarkable aircraft in its own right. This type of aircraft lends itself to many test regimes, including stall testing, which I believe it was strainubject to. That algorithms were used to achieve this feat is fairly amazing, when considering the lengthy period it takes to train a fighter pilot, and then to give them the sort of practice hours in mock combat to ensure the supremacy of USAF pilots.
It'd be interesting to know just how often politics trumps engineering. Seems like a lot of technology has been put on the shelf for reasons other than effectiveness and cost.
No, because the body count is the only thing that keeps us from just going to war and killing anyone who disagrees with us. “It is good that war is so horrible, else we should become too attached to it.”
![[UA] NAVI проти G2 Esports | Blast Premier Fall Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QWlIm4FGESQ/mqdefault.jpg)
One can only imagine how much more effective this would be in a fighter designed from scratch with no pilot requirements - life support, safety & ejection systems, physical controls and restrictions on tolerance of G-forces.
You mean Australia Ghost Bat lol. kind of show how far USA is behind in this technology as use a human piloted jet instead of building a purpose built AI drone from scratch like Australia did.
Also they still had a pilot in the cockpit as seem to not trust the AI.. Ghost Bat does not even have joysticks to control it.. no human can fly or operate it, even Turkey Khizelman has joysticks.
@@nedkelly9688 Ghost Bat is indeed cool technology, and nice to see it developed in Australia too.
I think its also a matter of design. If you design something from the ground up to not have a pilot onboard; then you can do a lot that would be otherwise not possible. Retro-fitting an F-16 and keeping it airborne is probably not as simple as we imagine.
I dont see anything wrong with having someone onboard... presumably they still have a better chance of bringing it back i n one piece if something goes wrong - and I doubt anyone really wants to see it turned to scrap if it can be avoided.
@@nedkelly9688 I believe the US's purpose of AI research is to integrate it within existing platforms, not design a whole airframe from the ground up. And it should be noted that the ghost bat is being developed by boeing.
Loyal Wingman looking more and more promising
Everyone gangsta until they build a space elevator 💀💀💀
Can't fathom any problems arising from AI powered war machines......
@JonathanHerman-xz6zc incorrect.
There are plenty of cases of AI producing unexpected outcomes, wit the ai coming up with solutions that developers still don't understand how it got from point a to b.
@JonathanHerman-xz6zc “Unexplainability and Incomprehensibility of Artificial Intelligence.” a paper by Roman V. Yampolskiy. Elon Musk has also spoken on this on rogans podcast
@JonathanHerman-xz6zc I just sent you a paper that I was put onto my watching elon on Rogan a few years ago.
I'm not an AI scientist or developer so, no I dont have any personal examples for you. I guess we'll see how well my original comment ages........
Damn, you guys do this stuff right! Great presentation done by the numbers.
Wait until SkyNet rise and create T-1000🙄
AI has become endemic in our society, with total, world wide connectivity, between whatever device they have control of. What could go wrong?
My work just in this cuntry just and i now one croup working for formation in this planet in my work i kive all formation of this people good luck
An interesting tactic, to bleed off speed, which is not what a pilot seeks. So i must infer that the algorithm is computing a few moves ahead as well?
The F-62 is a remarkable aircraft in its own right. This type of aircraft lends itself to many test regimes, including stall testing, which I believe it was strainubject to. That algorithms were used to achieve this feat is fairly amazing, when considering the lengthy period it takes to train a fighter pilot, and then to give them the sort of practice hours in mock combat to ensure the supremacy of USAF pilots.
X-62, not F-62, it is a modified F-16D Block 30 Hotrod Viper with an export avionics hump from the Israeli F-16D.
Cool. Awesome 😎
It'd be interesting to know just how often politics trumps engineering. Seems like a lot of technology has been put on the shelf for reasons other than effectiveness and cost.
nice video🛩
I like this powerful fighters jets
Can we retire human fighter pilots in 50 years time? Just drones taking the fight
No, because the body count is the only thing that keeps us from just going to war and killing anyone who disagrees with us.
“It is good that war is so horrible, else we should become too attached to it.”
one more step into skynet
NGAD
i don't think i need to say anything else