@@johnonymous1592how is it weak if someone tells you we follow evidence. I don't know if you're a Xtian or not, but unlike Xtians we actually have something called 'hadith science' where you can actually see who the people are...
The Day of judgement is going so hilarious and entertaining to watch for "these" Christian liars. Watching their state on the day of judgement is going to be priceless for the 21st Muslims...
@rizwanramzan5729 Isaiah 45:20 Assemble Yourself and come; Draw near together. You who have escaped from the nations. They have no knowledge, who carry the wood of their carved image(kaaba,black stone) And pray to a god that cannot save(allah) You need to pray to Jesus and accept him as the Son of God,God in the flesh to be saved on judgment day.
@user-ws1pp2hg2j So Jesus is God and the son of God and son of the man and a prophet 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Jesus was God in flesh, but then Jesus didn't know the hour... However, no one knows the day or hour when these things will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son himself. Only the Father knows... Matthew 24,36...🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Whenever our heart condemns us, for God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything" [1 John 3:20 CSB]. As we examine what the Scripture has to say about the extent of the knowledge of God, several things become clear. First, God is a God of infinite knowledge. There is nothing that he is not aware of. Jesus can't be God 🤣🤣🤣🤣
The christian dilemma: Muhammad peace be upon him was possessed by the devil and tricked by the devil, muhammad peace be upon him affirmed their books. Therefore their books are false
To be honest, there are very few muslim people left, like Muhammad and ZAYD IBN THABIT. All you have SECTS following the ZOROASTRIAN AVESTAN religion under the name of Muhammad or ALI!!
it's fun having some part of the refutation in your own knowledge already before farid has to explain it. - i know about sahih muslim 1699a, which doesn't concur with the narration in abi dawud. - i know about sahih bukhari 6819, which doesn't concur with the narration either. that already brings some helpful skepticism to the table. also, amazing outro.
I have an even spicier personal stance: If there isn't a clear Quran verse saying so, and an uncontradicted hadith supporting it, I ignore it and consider it apocrypha. Allah gave us the Quran, the greatest book, not in the Quran, not in my deen! I find most "haha gotcha muzzy" stuff to be extremely boring. Usually old news to even the most minimally educated and knowledgeable Muslim, and an exaggerated nothing that's been dealt with before.
@@Mortabluntyes brother but it’s important to note that the sunnah and the Quran never contradict as the prophet is infalliable in conveying the message of Islam. Thus you will find no authentic Hadith that contradicts the Quran
@@thecrow6388 It's funny, not offensive nor slanderous; Unlike Divad Wood the crossdresser, which I believe repersent modren day Christians - closet liberals.
@@exposingcrossdogtianity Eh no. They have not been refuted. Islam refutes itself and cannot survive if it doesn't use lies and comes up with theories that cannot be proven.
@@thecrow6388 Sorry to burst your echo chamber but Islam and Muslims Da'ee's have thoroughly debunked every claim imposed on them by naturally deceptive Christians. Christians have resulted to lying and twisting the wording/meaning of Hadiths/Verses as well as taking them out of context i.e Surah 9:5. Christianity cannot live off deception and as evidence your Mangod David Woods is an excellent example. Christianity also cannot support it's claims and when questioned by Muslims have to deflect to the Qur'an out of fear and desperation. It's typical for Christians to bark the same regurgitated argument despite multiple refutations in order to argue for the sake of arguing.
Dua to Protect Us from Shirk الَّلهُمَّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ أَنْ أُشْرِكَ بِكَ وأَنا َعلَمُ وأَستَغفِرُكَ لما لا أَعلَمُ Allahumma inni a`udhu bika an ushrika bika wa ana a`lamu wa astaghfiruka lima la a`lamu ‘ O Allah I seek refuge in You from knowingly associating partners with You, and I seek Your forgiveness for that which I do not know.’
Ya Muqallib al-quloob thabbit qalbi 'ala deenik يَا مُقَلِّبَ الْقُلُوبِ ثَبِّتْ قَلْبِى عَلَى دِينِكَ “O Controller of hearts, make my heart firm in Your religion.”
اللَّهُمَّ أَعِنِّيْ عَلَى ذِكْرِكَ وَشُكْرِكَ وَحُسْنِ عِبَادَتِكَ Allahumma a inni Ala Zikrik Wa Shukrika Wa Husni Ibadatika O Allah, help me remember You, to be grateful to You, and to worship You,
Whoever asks Allah (s.w.t) Paradise three times, Paradise says: 'O Allah, admit him into Paradise', and whoever seeks refuge from the Fire three times, the Fire says: 'O Allah, save him from the Fire.'" اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ الْجَنَّةَ وَأَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنَ النَّارِ
Sayyidul Istighfar اَللَّهُمَّ أَنْتَ رَبِّىْ لآ إِلهَ إلاَّ أَنْتَ Allahumma anta Rabbi la ilaha illa anta, خَلَقْتَنِىْ وَأَنَا عَبْدُكَ Khalaqtani wa ana Abduka وَأَنَا عَلى عَهْدِكَ wa ana ala ahdika وَوَعْدِكَ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُ wa wadika mastatatu أَعُوْذُبِكَ مِنْ شَرِّمَا صَنَعْتُ Audhu bika min Sharri ma sanatu أبُوْءُ لَكَ بِنِعْمَتِكَ عَلَىَّ abu’u Laka binimatika `alaiya وَأَبُوءُ لَكَ بِذَنْبِي wa abu’u laka bizanbi فَاغْفِرْ لِي faghfir lee فَإِنَّهُ لَا يَغْفِرُ الذُّنُوبَ إِلَّا أَنْتَ fa innahu laa yaghfirudz dzubuuba illa anta The Prophet (pbuh) added. “If somebody recites it during the day with firm faith in it, and dies on the same day before the evening, he will be from the people of Paradise; and if somebody recites it at night with firm faith in it, and dies before the morning, he will be from the people of Paradise.”
Praise Allah With the Most Virtuous Dhikr Abu Umaamah Al-Baheli رضي الله عنه says that the Messenger ﷺ passed by him while he was moving his lips, so he asked: “What are you saying O Abu Umaamah?” He replied: “I am remembering my Lord.” He ﷺ said: “Shall I not inform you of the most virtuous dhikr for the night and day? It is that you say: اَلْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَدَدَ مَا خَلَقَ al-ḥamdu lillāhi ʿadada mā khalaq, All praise is for Allah as much as what He has created. وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ مِلْءَ مَا خَلَقَ wal-ḥamdu lillāhi mil’a mā khalaq, All praise is for Allah as much as what can fill His creation. وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَدَدَ مَا فِي الْأَرْضِ وَالسَّمَاءِ wal-ḥamdu lillāhi ʿadada mā fil-arḍi wa-s-samā’, All praise is for Allah as much as what is in the earth and the sky. وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ مِلْءَ مَا فِي الْأَرْضِ وَالسَّمَاءِ wal-ḥamdu lillāhi mil’a mā fil-arḍi wa-s-samā’, All praise is for Allah as much as what can fill up the earth and the sky. وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَدَدَ مَا أَحْصَىٰ كِتَابُهُ wal-ḥamdu lillāhi ʿadada mā aḥṣā kitābuh, All praise is for Allah as much as what His Book has recorded. وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ مِلْءَ مَا أَحْصَىٰ كِتَابُهُ wal-ḥamdu lillāhi mil’a mā aḥṣā kitābuh, All praise is for Allah as much as what fills His Book. وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَدَدَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ wal-ḥamdu lillāhi ʿadada kulli shay’, All praise is for Allah as much as everything. وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ مِلْءَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ wal-ḥamdu lillāhi mil’a kulli shay’. All praise is for Allah as much as what fills everything. (Source: Ahmad: 22198 and Ibn Hibaan: 830)
It's an old one that they keep repeating because it makes Christians feel better. For Christians watching this the question arises why didn't you know the argument David and co. brought forth was flawed? How can anyone really believe this kind of argument when they know Islam can't be reconciled with Christianity? Yet people will still entertain stuff like this. As is often said, the truth hurts.
@@linkup901ify … yh they cant be reconciled, that is the very point of the Christian argument; theyre saying that Muhammad in the Quran is affirming the Bible which falsifies Islam because both cant be true at the same time. They say Muhammad did not know what the Bible actually said and affirmed it in ignorance. So "but they contradict" doesnt refute the argument; rather, that's the very foundation of the argument.
@@talha2830 You missed the point. Look, anyone who hears this argument has very likely already heard Muslim say stuff like Islam is the truth or Quran says the past books have been corrupted "they write it with their own hands and claim it's from Allah" paraphrasing but those involved have likely heard that exact verse from Muslims. I could go on, but the point is they(Muslims) already know that the Quran puts it's as the standard to judge with, meaning anything the Bible says can only be true if it agrees with the Quran. There is simply so many that Muslims already know as common knowledge that the argument can only be for the really ignorant ones and in reality for Christians to hear it and feel better even if it doesn't make sense.
As always, great knowledge and as long as you are in Bahrain it should be renamed Bihoor as you are a Bahr on your own. The only complaint I have is that outro should’ve been longer lol
I think i remember hearing a scholar say something along the lines of, if there is a difference of wording in the report between what's in the sahihayn and what's in other books then the sahihayn will usually be the correct one. waAllahu A'lam .
@@Spined1234 That's because they use the Islamic sources to show that Islam is false. It's what you need to do with Muslims. It's useless to use other sources because Muslims would say they don't accept those. I told you, friend, you need to think a bit deeper. But I know that ain't easy for a Muslim.
@@thecrow6388 do you lack intelligence or what? (you do)He said the verse the Prophet ﷺ mentions is not found in your Bible which is a proof that it’s not the book y’all have now. lol
@@thecrow6388 They lie about Islamic sources is what they actually do. It's the only thing Christians can do since they know they're not going to convince anyone with their trinity nonsense.
JazakAllah Khair this was on back on my head for a long time. Alhamdulillah for Islam. Now I know the reasons why it's rated Hassan and weak & let's if they get back to you & I know they wouldn't
Btw you got a response for your challenge of any classical Muslim scholar who affirmed the preservation of the Torah/gospel the channel is called Jai and Doc idk if it’s worth responding too though
@MichaelJordan-ke2ym very simply, the hadith of the Prophet SAW which states that when narrating from israeliyyat, do so without believing in it and without saying its a lie. Clearly shows that you take the bible with a grain of salt and use the Quran and Sunnah first and foremost then use that to see what parts of the Bible are correct
I do wanna ask a quick question: I found the same report from سنن أبي داود with the same متن in تفسير مقاتل بن سليمان however with no chain. Is this because the book is a recension and this report is simply an addition by a transmitter of the book?
Even if we assume the Hadith to be reliable, I would still question if that Torah/Injeel is the exact same as the current day bible, and not a different book that may have been lost in between back then and now.
Ok, bring the same "EDITION" that existed in the hands of Abdul-Allah bin Sallam (a Jewish rabbi in Yathrib) 😁 I doubt its the same as what David Wood & his goonies believe in.. However the hadith can be understood by this verse: ﴿ قُولُوا آمَنَّا بِاللَّهِ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَىٰ إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالْأَسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ﴾ [ البقرة: 136] Meaning regardless of what was placed infront of him, we believe in Moses as messenger & there was a message called Torah of which Allah descended unto him. Or that particular "text" in the page was a true untouched commandment.
Assalamu alaikum brother farid. For the sake of Allah almighty i am your brother in faith and can i please kindly ask you if is there any way i can directly talk with you for an delicate topic i really really desperately need your help since you are an expert at those topics i believe. Pls answer me as soon as possible
Correct me if I'm wrong. Let's say, for the sake of argument, the hadith is correct in it's entirety. But doesn't this mean Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) said this for the Torah, the Old Testament and not for the New Testament? Is there something I missed?
Yes it was specifically refering to the Torah. But, again even if the report is correct. Still the prophet was referring to the original torah not the Old testiment they have now. And he specifically used it to Judge its people who themselves asked him to do judge their own people. And that law regaeding the adulterers is the same law in Islam. They tried to hide it in the Torah and the prophet found it therein. Ao he was simply referring to the law. And we have many reports that shows the Prophet got angry when Umar (RA) wrote from it.
@@samhangster you missed the point I didn't say that the prophet had the original tablets, if you read my first comment carefully, I said: *"the prophet was referring to the original torah not the Old testiment they have now."* Meaning, the original Torah that wss with Moses not the Old Testament they have now which existed even before the time of the prophet. This is why I said the prophet got angry when he saw Umar quoting in paper from it.
A christian asked me about this Hadith because they heard it from David Wood and Sam shampoo. I told him point blank i don't know about the authenticaty of this but I'll have to ask someone more knowledgeable but then i said i don't believe prophet Muhammad said that. This dude went crazy and said it was in your Hadith right. I said do you believe in the Torah and he said Yes. So i pull up The age of Rebecca Genesis that can be found in the Torah. And it says she wad 3. This christian went crazy and said she wasn't but minute ago you said you believe in the Torah I said then this Hadith is weak. And he said No is not 😂😂😂. They pick and choose what to believe and what not. I said in Islam we don't have that. Whatever the Quran and Hadith said we follow .
@FaridResponds assalamu alaikum brother thank you so much for your Answer and please answer my one more question recently when I studying about preservation of quran to strengthen my faith I came to about the above question and I have one more doubt there is a hadees from sahih bukhari that zaid ibn thanth ra started looking for the Qur'an and collecting it from (what was written on) palmed stalks, thin white stones and also from the men who know it by heart, till I found the last verse of Surah At-Taubah with Abu Khuzaimah al-Ansari (Radiya Allahu Anhu), and I did not find it with anybody other than him" . [Reported by Imams al-Bukhari and Muslim ]. My question is this if the laste verse is only with abu kuzaima ra does that mean that no other sahaba know about that verse or no sahaba know that verse by heart this also rise the question that wether other sahaba like zaid umar abubakr uthman and other sahaba who compiled the quran memorised the entire quran?because if the verse 9.128-129 is only known by one sahaba then it means the rest of the sahaba don't know entire quran by heart becuase it said in hadith of sahih bukhari that zaid ra also collected quran from the hearts of men which question whether the other sahaba know the entire quran by heart which will effect the preservation of quran becuase I belive quran is truly preserved in the hearts of people by memorising starting from sahaba if the sahaba don't know the entire quran by heart it will be a problem for preservation of quran.2 my second question is it is also said that know verses where accepted by zaid ra without 2 testimony of the entire quran is memorised by sahaba then they know which are the authentic verses and my 3 question is that I am not sure about this but I heard that one of the verses brought by umar ra was not accepted becuase he failed to bring 2 testimony if the sahaba know the entire quran by heart they will know that whether the verse brought by umar ra is authentic or not it is also said that umar ra memorized entire quran so even he know wether the verse is correct or not and he can easily bring other sahaba as testimony if other sahaba like zaid and abubakr and uthman know the entire quran by heart and my 3 question is that how zaid ra accept the last two verse if abu kuzaima didn't bring 2 testimony becuase the verse is only found with him and .4I want to know that whether there was sahaba who memorized the entire quran at the time of compilation of quran becuase I believe that from the time of prophet to know quran is really preserved in the hearts of human from sahaba to until know if the sahaba at the time of compilation of quran doesn't know entire quran by heart it will create doubt in my mind about the preservation of quran Brother I am truly sorry to disturb you with this long question and sorry about this question but becuase of this questions in my mind my iman and belief is getting weaker day by day please help me becuse I want strengthen my faith because I am feeling that I am losing my iman day by day because of this question and iam scared that wether I will leave islam
There is a website called "call-to-monotheism" where you can find an article titled "Are the Verses from Surah 9:128-129 and Surah 33:23 Falsely Added to the Quran?" by Bassam Zawadi. They answer a lot of questions on their site.
As-salaam alaikum, are these three hadith all referencing the same event? It seems like their accounts slightly differ. Forgive me if I err, for I'm not educated in these matters. Jazakallah Khair.
@@FaridResponds That's not answering the question lol. Why call the corrupted version of the Torah 'Torah' when its not deserving of the name? Is it for convenience? I have no issue if its for convenience.
@@thelastrainshower It is answering the question. I don't believe it to be authentic, but refer to it as such since it is regarded as such by other religions. I don't bother saying: the alleged Torah, or the so-called Torah, every time either.
@@FaridResponds Ah. Now you answered. understood. It’s basically for convenience because it’s bothersome to keep saying the corrupted or alleged Torah. Jazākullāh khair.
Any text that is of the original Torah can be referred to as the Torah without impling all of it. We say the same for the Quran. I.e recite/listen to the Quran doesnt necessarily mean all of it, but can be part of it. Allah says He revealed the Quran in Ramadan, although only some ayah were revealed.
Clear from Ibn Abba 7363 their book is changed, it wasn't until the Bible was translated to Arabic till scholars realised it isn't the original revelation
@Farid Read carefully, Tawrat is the PORTION of the TORAH where ALLAH """"""""SPEAKS"""""" to prophet MUSA and gives guidance and LAWS, just like Allah speaks to Muhammad and gives LAWS and Guidance. The Last prophet Muhammad and ZAYD IBN THABIT, both Judged by the TAWRAT, and practiced the LAW for the crime of Adultery.
There is no need to reject this particular narraration of the hadith. "i believe in you and the one that sent you" = talking specifically just about the verse of stoning thats in question and not the book at all. The prophet salALLAHu alayhi wassalams hand being on the book has no bearing on him affirming just the verse on stoning and nothing else. Another explanation: the prophet salALLAHu alayhi wassalam was affirming the torah the jews had at the time, but not in a way Christian apologists would accept. Similar to the book "Elements" by Euclid, which is known to contain interpolations from multiple authors, despite this fact, is still called Elements, and is still attributed to Euclid. So while not talking about the Tawrah given to Musa alayhiselam, its possible that the tawrah at the time of the propher salALLAHu alayhi wassalam still contained many truths in it, would still be nominally called "tawrah", and still could be said to "come from ALLAH" in the sense that it contains many truths about prior prophets and messengers, angels, elements of al asma wal sifat, etc. I have no problem with Farid rejecting the hadith due to valid ikhtilaf, but seems like at an apologetics level it would be much better to show that even the toughest position to defend on the Muslim side is completely defensible against this weak shubhat
Moreover it may have been simply one detached scoll placed on the cushion. So He(saws) may have been affirming simply what was written on that 1 scroll. Its clear that the prophet(saws) didnt believe in all of the OT especially given the fact it has many slanders against the prophets and even God.
Asalam alaykum, brother. Alahamdullilah for the knowledge you've been given. I wanted to mention, though, that you shouldn't have that drawing at the end. It is imitating the creation of Allah. sahih muslim 2107 d-f
I mean if you can prove/disprove the word of your prophet, are muslims really following their prophet or are they following the scholars who interpret their prophet
Brother I’m Muslim and I see no problem in believing that the “injil” is the New Testament and the “tawrat” is the Hebrew Bible. We are being lazy by dismissing them and making a mockery of ayat in the Quran that command Ahle Kitab to live according to their scriptures. (Q5:46-48) Also, what’s so hard in seeing the Islamic message behind the crucifixion of Jesus Christ? According to the “injil” (NT) Jesus was a “shahid” (martyr/witness) for the “qadar” (pre-established plan) of Allah.
God of Moses is not Speaking to ISA in those GREEK New TESTAMENT authored by ROMANs and GREEKS. TAWRAT is only a part of and not the entire HEBREW bible, which is a collection of books across the time period.
Recently, I have come across articles suggesting that the two verses 9:128-129 were added to the quran by humans and were not found in the original quran. I'm pretty sure these studies were made by Rashid Khalifa and his team after the mathematical code 19.please help me to know the truth about this.
@FaridResponds assalamu alaikum brother thank you so much for your Answer and please answer my one more question recently when I studying about preservation of quran to strengthen my faith I came to about the above question and I have one more doubt there is a hadees from sahih bukhari that zaid ibn thanth ra started looking for the Qur'an and collecting it from (what was written on) palmed stalks, thin white stones and also from the men who know it by heart, till I found the last verse of Surah At-Taubah with Abu Khuzaimah al-Ansari (Radiya Allahu Anhu), and I did not find it with anybody other than him" . [Reported by Imams al-Bukhari and Muslim ]. My question is this if the laste verse is only with abu kuzaima ra does that mean that no other sahaba know about that verse or no sahaba know that verse by heart this also rise the question that wether other sahaba like zaid umar abubakr uthman and other sahaba who compiled the quran memorised the entire quran?because if the verse 9.128-129 is only known by one sahaba then it means the rest of the sahaba don't know entire quran by heart becuase it said in hadith of sahih bukhari that zaid ra also collected quran from the hearts of men which question whether the other sahaba know the entire quran by heart which will effect the preservation of quran becuase I belive quran is truly preserved in the hearts of people by memorising starting from sahaba if the sahaba don't know the entire quran by heart it will be a problem for preservation of quran.2 my second question is it is also said that know verses where accepted by zaid ra without 2 testimony of the entire quran is memorised by sahaba then they know which are the authentic verses and my 3 question is that I am not sure about this but I heard that one of the verses brought by umar ra was not accepted becuase he failed to bring 2 testimony if the sahaba know the entire quran by heart they will know that whether the verse brought by umar ra is authentic or not it is also said that umar ra memorized entire quran so even he know wether the verse is correct or not and he can easily bring other sahaba as testimony if other sahaba like zaid and abubakr and uthman know the entire quran by heart and my 3 question is that how zaid ra accept the last two verse if abu kuzaima didn't bring 2 testimony becuase the verse is only found with him and .4I want to know that whether there was sahaba who memorized the entire quran at the time of compilation of quran becuase I believe that from the time of prophet to know quran is really preserved in the hearts of human from sahaba to until know if the sahaba at the time of compilation of quran doesn't know entire quran by heart it will create doubt in my mind about the preservation of quran Brother I am truly sorry to disturb you with this long question and sorry about this question but becuase of this questions in my mind my iman and belief is getting weaker day by day please help me becuse I want strengthen my faith because I am feeling that I am losing my iman day by day because of this question and iam scared that wether I will leave islam.
@@shuaibabdulsalam5695 There is a website called "call-to-monotheism" The article is called "Are the Verses from Surah 9:128-129 and Surah 33:23 Falsely Added to the Quran?" by Bassam Zawadi.
I really don't get all these guys, why waste your time and life trying to debunk a religion with dumb takes. Invest your time in what you believe and try to understand that first, before you attempt to take on another religion. But then again, all these guys don't get that islam is not a new religion, it is correction of what came before and got interpolated.
Dont make EXCUSE like the TAWRAT is corrupted, and REJECT QURAN 5 48 verse. You will judge by the TAWRAT by keeping the QURAN as GUARDIAN over it. BEWARE of the VAIN DESIRE in the TALMUD(authored by PERSIAN ZOROASTRIAN Convert claiming to be JEWS, but actually practicing the AVESTA)
@FARID Read carefully QURAN 5 46, the INJEEL confirms the LAWs of the TAWRAT. I have NOT YET seen the INJEEL where ALLAH speaks to prophet ISA and gives guidance and LAWS. This is why the INJEEL was lost long ago during the events that happened after ISA. I suspect it can be found at the ROMAN VATICAN Archive vaults.
Paul was a lower-cased muslim and a unitarian monotheist. It’s not wise to speak ignorantly of him. It’s not Islamic to imitate the ignorant with such cheap mottos… 🤦♂️
@@moosa86Paul was a lower cased Muslim?! You do realise he had and forged one of the highest christologies effectively creating he divinity of Christ not explicitly present within the gospels. Paul was not a Muslim even Ibn Taymiyyah said he destroyed Christianity from the inside
As Salaamu 3laykum, jazakaALLAAH Khairan for the video. Of course the simplest explanation is that Prophet Muhammad was referring to the original Torah and not the distorted version. Furthermore, I would remove 05:36 onwards as we do not make fun of others like this.
Prophet must have said I believe whatever truth left in you, just like the Qur'an says about Torah, or this is the way we should understand the Hadith, in the light of Qur'an, sunnah and Bible, (For example Jeremiah 8:8)
you have debunked absolutely nothing here farid. so I see what you want to get across here, but even sahih muslim 1699a shows mohammad using the Torah to judge jewish people.... if the Jewish scripture had been corrupted why would he have ever possibly came to the conclusion to judge by it? his actions speak far louder then his words, he didnt even need to say that he believes the Torah because he USED ONE at a time where it already says exactly what it says now, and then judged by it. Did he say "this book isnt as good because its a previous revelation that got changed"? no... nothing like that, instead he pointed at a law in it and followed through with it, which also shows that mohammad believed the OT laws enough to apply them! feel free to reply if you have a proper response to this Farid, im curious :D
@@FaridResponds All you resorted to is tu quoque fallacy whereas the quran claims to have specific reasons why it was revealed in arabic. That reason being so ppl dont get confused or ask the christians or the jews for guidance were it to be revealed in another languange but guess what? This very reason is nullified, undermined by the very fact most muslims dont even speak arabic.
Farid although we don't believe the torah was persevered in the 7th century but generally speaking, I don't really see a huge problem with the hadith wording since it doesn't really imply the torah is 100% preserved and more so just that they are to be judged with the laws given to them
@@gkinguk that indeed Allah sent to Musa a book of laws and that the Jews should follow the laws that were given to them. Not necessary it is preserved letter by letter. والله أعلم
@gkinguk "i believe in you" could be in reference to the ruling or that specific scroll that had the verse of stoning in it. Remember historically, books were compiled as separate scrolls that were binded together. So it may have been one detached scroll placed on the cushion. In any case theres not enough detail in the hadith to go definitive either way.
Allah Almighty is the god the Jews and Christians before Islam to this day! If you open the genesis 1:1 Arabic Bible you will find word {الله} mean Allah
My first video on the "Islamic dilemma" can be found here: ua-cam.com/video/sb0uKeejoMk/v-deo.html
Ustadh, you are cooking!!!
Which books would you recommend as a must with rijāl?
A very weak response Farid, that really didn't go to the most important issues
Jesus is king
@@johnonymous1592how is it weak if someone tells you we follow evidence. I don't know if you're a Xtian or not, but unlike Xtians we actually have something called 'hadith science' where you can actually see who the people are...
Even with lies Christianity dies.
This is annoying because christians just mock us, with the same statement, instead of watching or reading our refutations.
Bro got that evengelion pfp 💀
We are to respect and honor the Ahl Uhl Kitab and their Deens.
@@Mortablunt no we are not.
@@Mortabluntwrong. Hatred of kuffar, like Christians, is the core of tawheed called Al Wala Wal Bara
Why do these Christian apologists need our prophet's (SAW) approval so bad?
There jeaulous
I thought they don’t believe in him
Wallahi these Christians make me truly grateful for guidance. Alhamdulilahi Rab Al3aalamin
The Day of judgement is going so hilarious and entertaining to watch for "these" Christian liars.
Watching their state on the day of judgement is going to be priceless for the 21st Muslims...
@rizwanramzan5729 Isaiah 45:20 Assemble Yourself and come; Draw near together. You who have escaped from the nations. They have no knowledge, who carry the wood of their carved image(kaaba,black stone) And pray to a god that cannot save(allah)
You need to pray to Jesus and accept him as the Son of God,God in the flesh to be saved on judgment day.
@user-ws1pp2hg2j plz make your mind up what Jesus is.??? Is he God, or is he the son of God ....
@@Spark290 both. He is also a prophet, Son of Man, Man.
@user-ws1pp2hg2j So Jesus is God and the son of God and son of the man and a prophet 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Jesus was God in flesh, but then Jesus didn't know the hour...
However, no one knows the day or hour when these things will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son himself. Only the Father knows... Matthew 24,36...🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Whenever our heart condemns us, for God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything" [1 John 3:20 CSB]. As we examine what the Scripture has to say about the extent of the knowledge of God, several things become clear. First, God is a God of infinite knowledge. There is nothing that he is not aware of.
Jesus can't be God 🤣🤣🤣🤣
The christian dilemma: Muhammad peace be upon him was possessed by the devil and tricked by the devil, muhammad peace be upon him affirmed their books.
Therefore their books are false
I'm stealing this.
@@FaridResponds my stuff is yours bro
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j Muhammad. There are no verses that say that Allah is Muhammad. :/
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j Allah is al-Kareem, meaning the generous. According to your understanding, nobody can be named Kareem. Nobody makes such a claim.
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j Your question is just weird. Anyhow... there were four other people named Muhammad in his society.
Brother Farid always responds in the best way. May Allah preserve him and bestow him and his family with Aafiyah.
What is Aafiyah, akhi?
@@mujahid5735 good health
عافية
@@mujahid5735 Aafiyah is Asking Allah to grant someone safety from all bad & evil and protect their overall well-being.
@@abdullahorilonise4048 Jazakallah Khayr. Ameen Allahumma ameen.
@@mujahid5735 Amin 🤲
The state of Christians obsessed with islam instead of their own dying religion. Alhamdulilah for Islam. Jazakallahu Khair brother
To be honest, there are very few muslim people left, like Muhammad and ZAYD IBN THABIT.
All you have SECTS following the ZOROASTRIAN AVESTAN religion under the name of Muhammad or ALI!!
That ending meme caught me off-guard lol
Brooo I was scrolling through for another vid and that caught me off guard also😂😂
it's fun having some part of the refutation in your own knowledge already before farid has to explain it.
- i know about sahih muslim 1699a, which doesn't concur with the narration in abi dawud.
- i know about sahih bukhari 6819, which doesn't concur with the narration either.
that already brings some helpful skepticism to the table.
also, amazing outro.
I have an even spicier personal stance: If there isn't a clear Quran verse saying so, and an uncontradicted hadith supporting it, I ignore it and consider it apocrypha. Allah gave us the Quran, the greatest book, not in the Quran, not in my deen!
I find most "haha gotcha muzzy" stuff to be extremely boring. Usually old news to even the most minimally educated and knowledgeable Muslim, and an exaggerated nothing that's been dealt with before.
@@Mortabluntyes brother but it’s important to note that the sunnah and the Quran never contradict as the prophet is infalliable in conveying the message of Islam. Thus you will find no authentic Hadith that contradicts the Quran
That ending was OUTLANDISH BROther HHHAHAHAHHA
It shows the level of Muslims. 🤦♂
@@thecrow6388
It's funny, not offensive nor slanderous; Unlike Divad Wood the crossdresser, which I believe repersent modren day Christians - closet liberals.
@@thecrow6388 Hahaha
@@ahmed.hasan_ Yup, you can't refute me, huh? 🤣🤣🤣
@@ahmed.hasan_ Thank you for your confirmation.
Well explained. May Allah reward you and bless you my brother. This is what we need. The cure for ignorance is to seek knowledge.
I’m crying 😭 the ending
You should, as it shows the low level of Muslims!
@@thecrow6388The only low is Christians regurgitation the same refuted points.
@@exposingcrossdogtianity Eh no. They have not been refuted. Islam refutes itself and cannot survive if it doesn't use lies and comes up with theories that cannot be proven.
@@thecrow6388 Sorry to burst your echo chamber but Islam and Muslims Da'ee's have thoroughly debunked every claim imposed on them by naturally deceptive Christians. Christians have resulted to lying and twisting the wording/meaning of Hadiths/Verses as well as taking them out of context i.e Surah 9:5. Christianity cannot live off deception and as evidence your Mangod David Woods is an excellent example. Christianity also cannot support it's claims and when questioned by Muslims have to deflect to the Qur'an out of fear and desperation. It's typical for Christians to bark the same regurgitated argument despite multiple refutations in order to argue for the sake of arguing.
@@thecrow6388 says the guy who believes in a contradiction no one could ever explain
Dua to Protect Us from Shirk
الَّلهُمَّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ أَنْ أُشْرِكَ بِكَ وأَنا َعلَمُ وأَستَغفِرُكَ لما لا أَعلَمُ
Allahumma inni a`udhu bika an ushrika bika wa ana a`lamu wa astaghfiruka lima la a`lamu ‘
O Allah I seek refuge in You from knowingly associating partners with You, and I seek Your forgiveness for that which I do not know.’
Ya Muqallib al-quloob thabbit qalbi 'ala deenik
يَا مُقَلِّبَ الْقُلُوبِ ثَبِّتْ قَلْبِى عَلَى دِينِكَ
“O Controller of hearts, make my heart firm in Your religion.”
اللَّهُمَّ أَعِنِّيْ عَلَى ذِكْرِكَ وَشُكْرِكَ وَحُسْنِ عِبَادَتِكَ
Allahumma a inni Ala Zikrik Wa Shukrika Wa Husni Ibadatika
O Allah, help me remember You, to be grateful to You, and to worship You,
Whoever asks Allah (s.w.t) Paradise three times, Paradise says: 'O Allah, admit him into Paradise', and whoever seeks refuge from the Fire three times, the Fire says: 'O Allah, save him from the Fire.'"
اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ الْجَنَّةَ وَأَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنَ النَّارِ
Sayyidul Istighfar
اَللَّهُمَّ أَنْتَ رَبِّىْ لآ إِلهَ إلاَّ أَنْتَ
Allahumma anta Rabbi la ilaha illa anta,
خَلَقْتَنِىْ وَأَنَا عَبْدُكَ
Khalaqtani wa ana Abduka
وَأَنَا عَلى عَهْدِكَ
wa ana ala ahdika
وَوَعْدِكَ مَا اسْتَطَعْتُ
wa wadika mastatatu
أَعُوْذُبِكَ مِنْ شَرِّمَا صَنَعْتُ
Audhu bika min Sharri ma sanatu
أبُوْءُ لَكَ بِنِعْمَتِكَ عَلَىَّ
abu’u Laka binimatika `alaiya
وَأَبُوءُ لَكَ بِذَنْبِي
wa abu’u laka bizanbi
فَاغْفِرْ لِي
faghfir lee
فَإِنَّهُ لَا يَغْفِرُ الذُّنُوبَ إِلَّا أَنْتَ
fa innahu laa yaghfirudz dzubuuba illa anta
The Prophet (pbuh) added. “If somebody recites it during the day with firm faith in it, and dies on the same day before the evening, he will be from the people of Paradise; and if somebody recites it at night with firm faith in it, and dies before the morning, he will be from the people of Paradise.”
Praise Allah With the Most Virtuous Dhikr
Abu Umaamah Al-Baheli رضي الله عنه says that the Messenger ﷺ passed by him while he was moving his lips, so he asked: “What are you saying O Abu Umaamah?” He replied: “I am remembering my Lord.”
He ﷺ said: “Shall I not inform you of the most virtuous dhikr for the night and day? It is that you say:
اَلْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَدَدَ مَا خَلَقَ
al-ḥamdu lillāhi ʿadada mā khalaq,
All praise is for Allah as much as what He has created.
وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ مِلْءَ مَا خَلَقَ
wal-ḥamdu lillāhi mil’a mā khalaq,
All praise is for Allah as much as what can fill His creation.
وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَدَدَ مَا فِي الْأَرْضِ وَالسَّمَاءِ
wal-ḥamdu lillāhi ʿadada mā fil-arḍi wa-s-samā’,
All praise is for Allah as much as what is in the earth and the sky.
وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ مِلْءَ مَا فِي الْأَرْضِ وَالسَّمَاءِ
wal-ḥamdu lillāhi mil’a mā fil-arḍi wa-s-samā’,
All praise is for Allah as much as what can fill up the earth and the sky.
وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَدَدَ مَا أَحْصَىٰ كِتَابُهُ
wal-ḥamdu lillāhi ʿadada mā aḥṣā kitābuh,
All praise is for Allah as much as what His Book has recorded.
وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ مِلْءَ مَا أَحْصَىٰ كِتَابُهُ
wal-ḥamdu lillāhi mil’a mā aḥṣā kitābuh,
All praise is for Allah as much as what fills His Book.
وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ عَدَدَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ
wal-ḥamdu lillāhi ʿadada kulli shay’,
All praise is for Allah as much as everything.
وَالْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِ مِلْءَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ
wal-ḥamdu lillāhi mil’a kulli shay’.
All praise is for Allah as much as what fills everything.
(Source: Ahmad: 22198 and Ibn Hibaan: 830)
This feels like the new go-to argument for christians
It's an old one that they keep repeating because it makes Christians feel better.
For Christians watching this the question arises why didn't you know the argument David and co. brought forth was flawed? How can anyone really believe this kind of argument when they know Islam can't be reconciled with Christianity? Yet people will still entertain stuff like this.
As is often said, the truth hurts.
@@linkup901ify … yh they cant be reconciled, that is the very point of the Christian argument; theyre saying that Muhammad in the Quran is affirming the Bible which falsifies Islam because both cant be true at the same time. They say Muhammad did not know what the Bible actually said and affirmed it in ignorance.
So "but they contradict" doesnt refute the argument; rather, that's the very foundation of the argument.
@@talha2830 You missed the point. Look, anyone who hears this argument has very likely already heard Muslim say stuff like Islam is the truth or Quran says the past books have been corrupted "they write it with their own hands and claim it's from Allah" paraphrasing but those involved have likely heard that exact verse from Muslims. I could go on, but the point is they(Muslims) already know that the Quran puts it's as the standard to judge with, meaning anything the Bible says can only be true if it agrees with the Quran.
There is simply so many that Muslims already know as common knowledge that the argument can only be for the really ignorant ones and in reality for Christians to hear it and feel better even if it doesn't make sense.
Beauty of knowledge compared to ignorance!
As always, great knowledge and as long as you are in Bahrain it should be renamed Bihoor as you are a Bahr on your own. The only complaint I have is that outro should’ve been longer lol
lol @ MC Hammer at the end
Thank you, brother Farid بارك الله فيك
I think i remember hearing a scholar say something along the lines of, if there is a difference of wording in the report between what's in the sahihayn and what's in other books then the sahihayn will usually be the correct one. waAllahu A'lam .
The hadith quotes a verse from the Torah that isn't found in today's bible, so how could these Christian apologists say it's the same Torah?
They don't believe Islam to be true. Think a little deeper, friend.
@@thecrow6388 Yet they're using the hadith as proof that their bible is uncorrupted.
@@Spined1234 That's because they use the Islamic sources to show that Islam is false. It's what you need to do with Muslims. It's useless to use other sources because Muslims would say they don't accept those.
I told you, friend, you need to think a bit deeper. But I know that ain't easy for a Muslim.
@@thecrow6388 do you lack intelligence or what? (you do)He said the verse the Prophet ﷺ mentions is not found in your Bible which is a proof that it’s not the book y’all have now. lol
@@thecrow6388 They lie about Islamic sources is what they actually do. It's the only thing Christians can do since they know they're not going to convince anyone with their trinity nonsense.
Ya Rabb I beseech you by your Rahmah and I beg you to make 1000 Muslims spam smash the like button of this video.
Why would you ask Allah for such a useless thing ? Instead, you should ask Him to grant you what will help you in this life and the Hereafter.
@@user-fu9mk8vp3l Thanks for advice. O readers who have read this far, spam smash even more. Come on. Aghhh 🔥
@@user-fu9mk8vp3l We can ask anything from our rabb.
We do not have any God of "Likes" and "subscribe button"
@@user-fu9mk8vp3lyou can ask Allah anything you want, don’t gatekeep dua, are you kidding me
It will easily get 1000 likes. This useless comment feels disrespectful to Allah, but that's just my opinion. Keep your duas between you and Allah.
May Allah make us Tullab al Ilm and may Allah diminish the people like David Wood
JazakAllah Khair this was on back on my head for a long time. Alhamdulillah for Islam. Now I know the reasons why it's rated Hassan and weak & let's if they get back to you & I know they wouldn't
الحمد لله على نعمة الإسلام ☪️
JazakAllahu khairan
Scholar for a dollar
?
😂😂😂, your sense of humour is legendary
Farid can you make a video on Roman prophecy and the objections by tommaso tessi
جزاك الله خيرا
adam elmasri is maybe worth debunking ? but alhamdulliah ur back
Btw you got a response for your challenge of any classical Muslim scholar who affirmed the preservation of the Torah/gospel the channel is called Jai and Doc idk if it’s worth responding too though
@MichaelJordan-ke2ym very simply, the hadith of the Prophet SAW which states that when narrating from israeliyyat, do so without believing in it and without saying its a lie. Clearly shows that you take the bible with a grain of salt and use the Quran and Sunnah first and foremost then use that to see what parts of the Bible are correct
I do wanna ask a quick question: I found the same report from سنن أبي داود with the same متن in تفسير مقاتل بن سليمان however with no chain. Is this because the book is a recension and this report is simply an addition by a transmitter of the book?
the legitimacy of this book's author is questionable to begin with
Asalaamo alaikum minute 2:16 which english translation did you refer to ?
Even if we assume the Hadith to be reliable, I would still question if that Torah/Injeel is the exact same as the current day bible, and not a different book that may have been lost in between back then and now.
Good video akhi❤
what is that meme at the end called? i've seen it before but i don't know the name
THE ENDINGGG 😭😭😭
May allah reward you.
What is that ending brother
😭 The ending
I thought anime is haram?
@@user-op8fg3ny3j what was haram about that? Maybe Wood’s dress
@@user-op8fg3ny3j i don't think anime is inherently haram. some elements in it which are prominent may be. Allahu A'lam.
@@veryunusualshrimpi mean, every anime contains shirk, kufr, magic, uncovered awrah, music, drawings of animate beings and many more
@@user-qo6zi5fw2p no, not really. don't generalize.
LMAO didn’t expect that ending
Ok, bring the same "EDITION" that existed in the hands of Abdul-Allah bin Sallam (a Jewish rabbi in Yathrib) 😁
I doubt its the same as what David Wood & his goonies believe in..
However the hadith can be understood by this verse:
﴿ قُولُوا آمَنَّا بِاللَّهِ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَىٰ إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالْأَسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ﴾
[ البقرة: 136]
Meaning regardless of what was placed infront of him, we believe in Moses as messenger & there was a message called Torah of which Allah descended unto him.
Or that particular "text" in the page was a true untouched commandment.
Assalamualaikum. Please what’s the name of the other sheikh who graded it as a weak Hadith? Couldn’t hear you properly.
Just got it. Sheikh Shuaib Arnaut
What a ending 😂
Ma sha Allah
What’s crazy is how much they are aware of the religion and still disbelieve
Assalamu alaikum brother farid. For the sake of Allah almighty i am your brother in faith and can i please kindly ask you if is there any way i can directly talk with you for an delicate topic i really really desperately need your help since you are an expert at those topics i believe. Pls answer me as soon as possible
Correct me if I'm wrong. Let's say, for the sake of argument, the hadith is correct in it's entirety. But doesn't this mean Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) said this for the Torah, the Old Testament and not for the New Testament? Is there something I missed?
Yes it was specifically refering to the Torah. But, again even if the report is correct. Still the prophet was referring to the original torah not the Old testiment they have now. And he specifically used it to Judge its people who themselves asked him to do judge their own people.
And that law regaeding the adulterers is the same law in Islam. They tried to hide it in the Torah and the prophet found it therein.
Ao he was simply referring to the law.
And we have many reports that shows the Prophet got angry when Umar (RA) wrote from it.
@@israfilangel8062 Where did the torah go?
@@samhangster the original Torah in the Tablets of Moses.. disappeared, only some portions of it made it to the Old Testament.
@@israfilangel8062 so you’re saying that the Prophet PBUH had the original tablets of Moses? Do you have any evidence for this?
@@samhangster you missed the point I didn't say that the prophet had the original tablets, if you read my first comment carefully, I said: *"the prophet was referring to the original torah not the Old testiment they have now."*
Meaning, the original Torah that wss with Moses not the Old Testament they have now which existed even before the time of the prophet.
This is why I said the prophet got angry when he saw Umar quoting in paper from it.
Farid Will you do a video response to David wood video “What Every Christian Needs To Know About Islam".
A christian asked me about this Hadith because they heard it from David Wood and Sam shampoo. I told him point blank i don't know about the authenticaty of this but I'll have to ask someone more knowledgeable but then i said i don't believe prophet Muhammad said that. This dude went crazy and said it was in your Hadith right. I said do you believe in the Torah and he said Yes. So i pull up The age of Rebecca Genesis that can be found in the Torah. And it says she wad 3. This christian went crazy and said she wasn't but minute ago you said you believe in the Torah I said then this Hadith is weak. And he said No is not 😂😂😂. They pick and choose what to believe and what not. I said in Islam we don't have that. Whatever the Quran and Hadith said we follow .
Walaykum asalam
@FaridResponds assalamu alaikum brother thank you so much for your Answer and please answer my one more question recently when I studying about preservation of quran to strengthen my faith I came to about the above question and I have one more doubt there is a hadees from sahih bukhari that zaid ibn thanth ra started looking for the Qur'an and collecting it from (what was written on) palmed stalks, thin white stones and also from the men who know it by heart, till I found the last verse of Surah At-Taubah with Abu Khuzaimah al-Ansari (Radiya Allahu Anhu), and I did not find it with anybody other than him" . [Reported by Imams al-Bukhari and Muslim ]. My question is this if the laste verse is only with abu kuzaima ra does that mean that no other sahaba know about that verse or no sahaba know that verse by heart this also rise the question that wether other sahaba like zaid umar abubakr uthman and other sahaba who compiled the quran memorised the entire quran?because if the verse 9.128-129 is only known by one sahaba then it means the rest of the sahaba don't know entire quran by heart becuase it said in hadith of sahih bukhari that zaid ra also collected quran from the hearts of men which question whether the other sahaba know the entire quran by heart which will effect the preservation of quran becuase I belive quran is truly preserved in the hearts of people by memorising starting from sahaba if the sahaba don't know the entire quran by heart it will be a problem for preservation of quran.2 my second question is it is also said that know verses where accepted by zaid ra without 2 testimony of the entire quran is memorised by sahaba then they know which are the authentic verses and my 3 question is that I am not sure about this but I heard that one of the verses brought by umar ra was not accepted becuase he failed to bring 2 testimony if the sahaba know the entire quran by heart they will know that whether the verse brought by umar ra is authentic or not it is also said that umar ra memorized entire quran so even he know wether the verse is correct or not and he can easily bring other sahaba as testimony if other sahaba like zaid and abubakr and uthman know the entire quran by heart and my 3 question is that how zaid ra accept the last two verse if abu kuzaima didn't bring 2 testimony becuase the verse is only found with him and .4I want to know that whether there was sahaba who memorized the entire quran at the time of compilation of quran becuase I believe that from the time of prophet to know quran is really preserved in the hearts of human from sahaba to until know if the sahaba at the time of compilation of quran doesn't know entire quran by heart it will create doubt in my mind about the preservation of quran
Brother I am truly sorry to disturb you with this long question and sorry about this question but becuase of this questions in my mind my iman and belief is getting weaker day by day please help me becuse I want strengthen my faith because I am feeling that I am losing my iman day by day because of this question and iam scared that wether I will leave islam
Ws. Contact me on twitter.
There is a website called "call-to-monotheism" where you can find an article titled "Are the Verses from Surah 9:128-129 and Surah 33:23 Falsely Added to the Quran?" by Bassam Zawadi. They answer a lot of questions on their site.
@@FaridRespondsjai&doc have respond to your challenge
@@mj9522 By failing to quote al-Bukhari and al-Razi? Okay.
As-salaam alaikum, are these three hadith all referencing the same event? It seems like their accounts slightly differ. Forgive me if I err, for I'm not educated in these matters. Jazakallah Khair.
Ws. Yeah. Same event. Some differences from narrators.
The end scared me 😂😂
BRO THE OUTRO LMFAOOO 😭😭😭😭😭
Question @FaridResponds how would you respond if someone said, “but why does the Prophet sallallahu Alayhi wa Salam even call it Torah to begin with?”
I call it the Torah, too.
@@FaridResponds That's not answering the question lol. Why call the corrupted version of the Torah 'Torah' when its not deserving of the name? Is it for convenience? I have no issue if its for convenience.
@@thelastrainshower It is answering the question. I don't believe it to be authentic, but refer to it as such since it is regarded as such by other religions. I don't bother saying: the alleged Torah, or the so-called Torah, every time either.
@@FaridResponds Ah. Now you answered. understood. It’s basically for convenience because it’s bothersome to keep saying the corrupted or alleged Torah. Jazākullāh khair.
Any text that is of the original Torah can be referred to as the Torah without impling all of it. We say the same for the Quran. I.e recite/listen to the Quran doesnt necessarily mean all of it, but can be part of it. Allah says He revealed the Quran in Ramadan, although only some ayah were revealed.
Clear from Ibn Abba 7363 their book is changed, it wasn't until the Bible was translated to Arabic till scholars realised it isn't the original revelation
Farid plz address the issue of Fadak plz....
What do you know about Fadak that makes you feel that there’s any issue that requires addressing?
@@samy7013 It's one of major Conflicts btw Sects of Muslims.
Sunnah Discourse channel already discussed this issue extensively
Walikumussalam
Alhamdulillah
Alhamdulillah
Alhamdulillah for islam ❤
Farid will you respond to godlogic videos?
@Farid Read carefully, Tawrat is the PORTION of the TORAH where ALLAH """"""""SPEAKS"""""" to prophet MUSA and gives guidance and LAWS, just like Allah speaks to Muhammad and gives LAWS and Guidance.
The Last prophet Muhammad and ZAYD IBN THABIT, both Judged by the TAWRAT, and practiced the LAW for the crime of Adultery.
Will you do a video on Abdullah Sameer because I think he has gone crazy.
His arguments are so trash noone even pays him any attention lol
@@amsakkejha3827 it does not matter if his arguments are trash because some people might believe him.
@@Salqar123 the only people that would believe him and leave the deen as a result are likely people that the pen has been lifted for tbh lol
@@amsakkejha3827😂 That's true
@@Salqar123Only ppl that believe him are just sappy murtads who think Islam is too strict 😂😂
Great job!
Alhamdulillah
There is no need to reject this particular narraration of the hadith.
"i believe in you and the one that sent you" = talking specifically just about the verse of stoning thats in question and not the book at all. The prophet salALLAHu alayhi wassalams hand being on the book has no bearing on him affirming just the verse on stoning and nothing else.
Another explanation: the prophet salALLAHu alayhi wassalam was affirming the torah the jews had at the time, but not in a way Christian apologists would accept. Similar to the book "Elements" by Euclid, which is known to contain interpolations from multiple authors, despite this fact, is still called Elements, and is still attributed to Euclid. So while not talking about the Tawrah given to Musa alayhiselam, its possible that the tawrah at the time of the propher salALLAHu alayhi wassalam still contained many truths in it, would still be nominally called "tawrah", and still could be said to "come from ALLAH" in the sense that it contains many truths about prior prophets and messengers, angels, elements of al asma wal sifat, etc.
I have no problem with Farid rejecting the hadith due to valid ikhtilaf, but seems like at an apologetics level it would be much better to show that even the toughest position to defend on the Muslim side is completely defensible against this weak shubhat
Moreover it may have been simply one detached scoll placed on the cushion. So He(saws) may have been affirming simply what was written on that 1 scroll. Its clear that the prophet(saws) didnt believe in all of the OT especially given the fact it has many slanders against the prophets and even God.
W...w... what happened at the end?
Asalam alaykum, brother. Alahamdullilah for the knowledge you've been given. I wanted to mention, though, that you shouldn't have that drawing at the end. It is imitating the creation of Allah.
sahih muslim 2107 d-f
Did u ever publish a book regarding the refutation of Brubaker his so called 'errors' found in the Quran manuscripts
PDF available on my academia page.
Ma-sha-Allah (As God wills) more waffling from D.wood
I mean if you can prove/disprove the word of your prophet, are muslims really following their prophet or are they following the scholars who interpret their prophet
You sort of have brain damage.
wth was that ending
Which book did he say??
3:30
Oh ,we are back to refuting david wood it's been along time
What was that ending 😭
Keep smashing that like button till we reach 1000
Brother I’m Muslim and I see no problem in believing that the “injil” is the New Testament and the “tawrat” is the Hebrew Bible. We are being lazy by dismissing them and making a mockery of ayat in the Quran that command Ahle Kitab to live according to their scriptures. (Q5:46-48)
Also, what’s so hard in seeing the Islamic message behind the crucifixion of Jesus Christ? According to the “injil” (NT) Jesus was a “shahid” (martyr/witness) for the “qadar” (pre-established plan) of Allah.
Are you okay?
God of Moses is not Speaking to ISA in those GREEK New TESTAMENT authored by ROMANs and GREEKS.
TAWRAT is only a part of and not the entire HEBREW bible, which is a collection of books across the time period.
What are you on bruh, I think the Christians got to your head
@@user-rt4hj7tj5p so allah's word got corrupted and we can't really find muhammad predicted in the Bible by Jesus
@@tymon1928 PERSIAN Zoroastrians and Pagan ROMANS are unable to UNDESTAND the TAWRAT and the QURAN.
Excellent
Asalamu aleykum, will u respond to "Jaiapologetics"?
Ws. Editing vid.
@@FaridRespondsMashaAllah ❤May Allah reward you
5:37 😂😂😂
Brother Farid, have you actually played Undertale? Because you used the sans speaking sound in some of your old videos
Yup.
@@FaridRespondsGoat. Honestly I still haven't finished it after years now h. Sans is difficult.
@@mujahid5735 Bruh. I skipped that part. Not wasting ten hours...
@@FaridRespondsDidnt know you were cultured like that, ya ustadh 😮💨
Recently, I have come across articles suggesting that the two verses 9:128-129 were added to the quran by humans and were not found in the original quran. I'm pretty sure these studies were made by Rashid Khalifa and his team after the mathematical code 19.please help me to know the truth about this.
He was wrong and outside the fold of Islam for making such a claim.
@FaridResponds assalamu alaikum brother thank you so much for your Answer and please answer my one more question recently when I studying about preservation of quran to strengthen my faith I came to about the above question and I have one more doubt there is a hadees from sahih bukhari that zaid ibn thanth ra started looking for the Qur'an and collecting it from (what was written on) palmed stalks, thin white stones and also from the men who know it by heart, till I found the last verse of Surah At-Taubah with Abu Khuzaimah al-Ansari (Radiya Allahu Anhu), and I did not find it with anybody other than him" . [Reported by Imams al-Bukhari and Muslim ]. My question is this if the laste verse is only with abu kuzaima ra does that mean that no other sahaba know about that verse or no sahaba know that verse by heart this also rise the question that wether other sahaba like zaid umar abubakr uthman and other sahaba who compiled the quran memorised the entire quran?because if the verse 9.128-129 is only known by one sahaba then it means the rest of the sahaba don't know entire quran by heart becuase it said in hadith of sahih bukhari that zaid ra also collected quran from the hearts of men which question whether the other sahaba know the entire quran by heart which will effect the preservation of quran becuase I belive quran is truly preserved in the hearts of people by memorising starting from sahaba if the sahaba don't know the entire quran by heart it will be a problem for preservation of quran.2 my second question is it is also said that know verses where accepted by zaid ra without 2 testimony of the entire quran is memorised by sahaba then they know which are the authentic verses and my 3 question is that I am not sure about this but I heard that one of the verses brought by umar ra was not accepted becuase he failed to bring 2 testimony if the sahaba know the entire quran by heart they will know that whether the verse brought by umar ra is authentic or not it is also said that umar ra memorized entire quran so even he know wether the verse is correct or not and he can easily bring other sahaba as testimony if other sahaba like zaid and abubakr and uthman know the entire quran by heart and my 3 question is that how zaid ra accept the last two verse if abu kuzaima didn't bring 2 testimony becuase the verse is only found with him and .4I want to know that whether there was sahaba who memorized the entire quran at the time of compilation of quran becuase I believe that from the time of prophet to know quran is really preserved in the hearts of human from sahaba to until know if the sahaba at the time of compilation of quran doesn't know entire quran by heart it will create doubt in my mind about the preservation of quran
Brother I am truly sorry to disturb you with this long question and sorry about this question but becuase of this questions in my mind my iman and belief is getting weaker day by day please help me becuse I want strengthen my faith because I am feeling that I am losing my iman day by day because of this question and iam scared that wether I will leave islam.
@@shuaibabdulsalam5695
There is a website called "call-to-monotheism"
The article is called "Are the Verses from Surah 9:128-129 and Surah 33:23 Falsely Added to the Quran?" by Bassam Zawadi.
❤❤❤
Bro what's that ending 😅
I really don't get all these guys, why waste your time and life trying to debunk a religion with dumb takes. Invest your time in what you believe and try to understand that first, before you attempt to take on another religion.
But then again, all these guys don't get that islam is not a new religion, it is correction of what came before and got interpolated.
Dont make EXCUSE like the TAWRAT is corrupted, and REJECT QURAN 5 48 verse. You will judge by the TAWRAT by keeping the QURAN as GUARDIAN over it.
BEWARE of the VAIN DESIRE in the TALMUD(authored by PERSIAN ZOROASTRIAN Convert claiming to be JEWS, but actually practicing the AVESTA)
@FARID Read carefully QURAN 5 46, the INJEEL confirms the LAWs of the TAWRAT.
I have NOT YET seen the INJEEL where ALLAH speaks to prophet ISA and gives guidance and LAWS.
This is why the INJEEL was lost long ago during the events that happened after ISA. I suspect it can be found at the ROMAN VATICAN Archive vaults.
❤
Seriously why is there a tiny asian cat lady at the end :|||||||
It's a meme. I think he used it to ridicule David Wood.
Assalamualaikum
Allahu akbar
Hahaha that ending
Without Paul's lies, Christianity dies
Paul was a lower-cased muslim and a unitarian monotheist. It’s not wise to speak ignorantly of him. It’s not Islamic to imitate the ignorant with such cheap mottos… 🤦♂️
@@moosa86Paul was a lower cased Muslim?! You do realise he had and forged one of the highest christologies effectively creating he divinity of Christ not explicitly present within the gospels. Paul was not a Muslim even Ibn Taymiyyah said he destroyed Christianity from the inside
Wasn't this argument debunked already???
As Salaamu 3laykum, jazakaALLAAH Khairan for the video. Of course the simplest explanation is that Prophet Muhammad was referring to the original Torah and not the distorted version. Furthermore, I would remove 05:36 onwards as we do not make fun of others like this.
Prophet must have said I believe whatever truth left in you, just like the Qur'an says about Torah, or this is the way we should understand the Hadith, in the light of Qur'an, sunnah and Bible, (For example Jeremiah 8:8)
Are you a PERSIAN?
Why?
Usually Persian Zoroastrian Convert who doesnt not understand the QURAN. will write what wrote in your first comment.
I have corrected grammatical error. Hope you got my point now.
@@shafeequeahmed4272 I see, you are a PERSIAN.
you have debunked absolutely nothing here farid.
so I see what you want to get across here, but even sahih muslim 1699a shows mohammad using the Torah to judge jewish people.... if the Jewish scripture had been corrupted why would he have ever possibly came to the conclusion to judge by it? his actions speak far louder then his words, he didnt even need to say that he believes the Torah because he USED ONE at a time where it already says exactly what it says now, and then judged by it. Did he say "this book isnt as good because its a previous revelation that got changed"? no... nothing like that, instead he pointed at a law in it and followed through with it, which also shows that mohammad believed the OT laws enough to apply them!
feel free to reply if you have a proper response to this Farid, im curious :D
Check out my previous responses to the Islamic dilemma.
@@FaridResponds
You just keep showing how you fail to present david's argument correctly. For example the quran being in arabic among other things
@@malhekuba7473 That is a different point that was also refuted on my channel. :3
@@FaridResponds
All you resorted to is tu quoque fallacy whereas the quran claims to have specific reasons why it was revealed in arabic. That reason being so ppl dont get confused or ask the christians or the jews for guidance were it to be revealed in another languange but guess what? This very reason is nullified, undermined by the very fact most muslims dont even speak arabic.
@malhekuba7473 So, what language should've the Quran be revealed in?
Farid although we don't believe the torah was persevered in the 7th century but generally speaking, I don't really see a huge problem with the hadith wording since it doesn't really imply the torah is 100% preserved and more so just that they are to be judged with the laws given to them
what do you think i believe in you means?
@@gkinguk that indeed Allah sent to Musa a book of laws and that the Jews should follow the laws that were given to them. Not necessary it is preserved letter by letter. والله أعلم
@@KiroTheHero so you just making up stuff then in your interpretation
@gkinguk "i believe in you" could be in reference to the ruling or that specific scroll that had the verse of stoning in it. Remember historically, books were compiled as separate scrolls that were binded together. So it may have been one detached scroll placed on the cushion. In any case theres not enough detail in the hadith to go definitive either way.
@@user-fn8wn3yo3j It doesnt exist in its entirety but remnants of it.
3 disgusting apologists
✝️umor pa✝️ien✝️s
yes but YHWH will heal us, sadly allah wont.
Allah Almighty is the god the Jews and Christians before Islam to this day! If you open the genesis 1:1 Arabic Bible you will find word {الله} mean Allah