Shias watching this video should set a time limit for themselves depending on how much time they have. Do you think it is reasonable to find evidence for each of the Twelve Imams in a week? Two weeks? A month? Set a reasonable limit and force yourself to find an answer within that time. If you are unable to find sufficient proof, then I invite you to the path of the Prophet (peace be upon him).
Spoilers: You won't find any credible/sahih narration at all with the names of all imams. There I saved you all the trouble imposed on you by Farid. Follow Mohammed ﷺ and his companions as you were ordered in the Quran. :)
You may have made some good points that I can’t question, since I don’t much about the narrators. However, all 11 Imams were murdered. Some were imprisoned, most were poisoned and one of them was massacred at Karbala. Can you explain why they were murdered? Because the way I see it to that question is there are two logical answers, either: a passionate hate for the Ahlulbayt, due to association with the Prophet SAW or because those 11 men were important and there is a deeper reason as to why Ummayd and Abbasid caliphs would spy on them until they’d have them poisoned. Also if it’s not these specific 12 men, then it must be another 12 men, according to Sunnis Hadiths as well.
Farid: Avoid these self-appointments, where the Imam is appointing himself. And if the Imam is asking for one-fifth of your stuff, then that is sus. Mohammed (pbuh): I have been appointed as Prophet. And btw, the war booty is for Allah and me (Quran 8:1). One-fifth is for Allah and me.
If the imams have knowledge of everything up to the hour then they must know when the hour is since the hour would be as soon as they no longer possess knowledge
@@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul yes of course but I’m saying if the Shia position is the 12 imams have knowledge of the future right up until the hour then it stands to reason they know the hour is right as soon as their knowledge of the future ends, they’re making the assertion that they know the hour by default
This in itself is shirk and no longer is Islam since ALLAH ALONE has all the knowledge (past, present, future) because if these so called imams also have the same knowledge Allah no longer remains a necessary being
According to quran, a man bought the Palace of sheehah before Prophet Sulaman blinked his eyes. He outshone the strongest jins. Please explain how an ordinary man not a prophet can do this? are you saying tis man wassuperman?
Timestamps- Some superpowers of "imams" • 2:10 imams have knowledge about past and present •2:29 imams have access to angels •2:43 imams know when the previous imam dies •4:28 imp. 6:50 1st "proof" by nakshawani problems- •isnad problem(ibrahim bin hashim being weak narrator) •muhammad jawad is appointing his son as the imam but the problem is jawad's imamah is unproved So if he appoint his son as an imam it means nothing 9:54 second "proof" by nakjawani Problems- •al barqi's books predates al kulayni's book al kafi by 50 years and it gives the same report but it only mentions 3 people instead of 12 It seems like al-kulayni fabricated everything.i.e the report is fabricated Most probably,Al barqi has the original report with only 3 imams and al kulayni just filled the gaps •this report has been reported by Al Jawad himself (at 15:41 )
and who would have thought? (They turn out to be half quranist and half west liberal and come from a sufi/shia(anything besides actually sunni salafi) background)
@@ManhaJSalafeeSalam alaikum when someone clicking on your channel, Un-Islamic things appear, especially with the name of your channel that does not match it. Advice, remove it for known reasons. If I could advise you secretly, I would do so, but this is not available to me at all.( subscriptions)
Umar ibn al-Khattab (ra) reported: The Messenger of Allah (saw) said, “Verily, among what I fear most for my nation is every hypocrite with a knowledgeable tongue.” (Musnad Ahmad)
أخرج البيهقي في السنن الكبرى: أخبرنا أبو الحسين بن بشران العدل ببغداد أنا إسماعيل بن محمد الصفار ثنا الحسن بن علي بن عفان ثنا ابن نمير عن عبيد الله بن عمر عن نافع عن ابن عمر أنه كان إذا اشترى جارية كشف عن ساقها ووضع يده بين ثدييها وعلى عجزها، وكأنه كان يضعها عليها من وراء الثوب
I crossed paths with him during his time in Hartford. He was the “cool Imam” during the height of the interfaith dialogue era. He used to do a lot of “well, these terrorists are actually Sunnis, let me tell you about Shi’ism” routine”. He has gotten very popular
Farid, respectfully, you failed to disprove nakshawani's video about the twelve imams 😂 anyone who watches the full lecture without any bias will understand where the twelve imams from the shia theology comes from
Not falling for these "insufficient response" when this is what Nakshawani presented throughout the whole. At first, I thought you guys were sincere in this but I can see through the coping without refuting.
@@everythingandroidois it’s ok no one’s forcing you to watch the lecture, if you trust everything in this video to be 100% correct then that’s your choice.
What's funny is that we have multiple Shiee hadiths in which people would come up to the Imams and ask them who the next Imam is or if there even will be another Imam. If they already had access to a hadith which states the 12 imams by name then it makes no sense why they would ask the Imams these questions.
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 Nah but you evidently forgot to use yours when typing out your rebuttal. Ja’afar Al-Sadiq, in two separate narrations, says that the Imam does not pass away until Allah tells him who the next Imam will be. (Al-Kulayni 1/166) Why would he need Allah to tell him who the next Imam is if there already was an authentic hadith with all 12 imams mentioned in it?
@@Spined1234 bro what are you talking about? Are you saying there was an authetic hadith existing during the time of the Rasulullah SAW where all 12 imams are listed by name? Prophet muhmmad already said Ali is your maula, then from Ali (as) he said who the next maula will be and so on. And only Allah appoints his leaders
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 Maula is not Imam. Nobody at the time of the Prophet peace be upon him understood "Maula" to mean divinely appointed infallible imam. And no, there is no authentic hadith from the Prophet peace be upon him in which he states there will be 12 divinely appointed infallible imams starting with Ali.
@@Spined1234 yeah maula means friend because Prophet Muhammad saw stopped everyone at khums in the heat just to say Ali is my friend, and Ali is your friend. Everything the Prophet SAW says is by the wishes of Allah and Allah SWT had commanded him to say infront of everyone that Imam Ali (as) is your leader. You guys think anyone can be a religious guidance of the ummah. No sunni can consistently tell me how a leader is appointed. Some say it's because abu bakr lead prayers, others say the ummah decide amongst themselves like a democracy and others argue that Prophet Muhammad SAW told abu bakr directly.
Nice to see you and a few brothers teaming up to disprove the nonsense these Shia spread, nothing but speculation, conjecture and conspiracy, of course the bots will defend them regardless but may Allah reward the Muslims fighting to defend the truth
“Nothing but speculation, conjecture, and conspiracy” while he’s using the Sahih books lmaoooo so you’re saying your own Hadiths are nothing but conjecture, conspiracy, and speculation? Got it
First prove that umar Abubakar n Usman where not mushrikeen then come n tell us....the one who said quran is enough for us went to saqifa to elect a Khalifa if quran is enough y the hell u went to get selected
@@HR-313 I acknowledge there are differences. However here are the similarities: Both schools faced persecution against Sunni imperialism. Both schools have a divine appointment concept which is unique and cannot be traced in history. Imam is a term used but historically there are no Imams like the 12. Likewise Guru is a term used before but there are no Gurus like the 10. In additions there were some other Ahlul Bayt who claimed Imamate and declared kaffirs by the Imamis. Likewise within the Sikhs members of Guru line always claimed there they are the Gurus. They too are condemned by Sikhs. In the 5th Guru's time the oldest son of the 4th Guru claimed he was the Guru. For 12er Shia Imam Jafar disowned his son Abdullah for Imamate. The strange part it some Sikhs believe in Guru Gobind Singh will return. Likewise the 12ers are waiting for the Mahdi' s return. Lastly Sikhs have a Guru that became Guru before baligh. This is the 8th Guru. Likewise the same case with 12er Shias where some Imams became Imams before baligh. Likewise one of the Gurus also disowned his son for claiming to be a Guru.
So who knows our books, a Shia who lies or sunnis? You don't even have books of our equivalent! You don't have any idea of the standard they are and how they are to be used with context of actual history, NOT your emotional non provable history
Looks to me Shia's are rattled, multiple comments on this video but no answers? he kindly asked you to reflect on your own books, your own evidences, instead your focus is here on the comment section.
@@OnePullUpKing bruhhh his heading of the video there's no proofs in shia works but at the end quotes alkafi which specifically mentions all 12 by name. Irrespective how hurt he feels by it, it was a click bait by farid and he gotcha
@farid you’ve not done well either. I have been following your responses trying to find out the truth but you’re not doing a good job either. Nakshwani said he doesn’t want to convert anyone. He is telling you to stick to yours and he to his and don’t call each other infidels. You Muslims are a funny bunch. Sometimes I think, you’re in awe of Mr. Nakshwani and maybe just trying to respond to all his lectures, weakly I must add, so you can gain fame and prestige perhaps? I hope you’re not doing it for the clicks.
Oh no I’m sure you’re such a legitimate knowledge seeker just trying to find out the truth. Get out of here you kadhab. Nakhshwani presents extremely weak evidence and then extrapolates an unsubstantiated conclusion to support his views.
Alot of people talking about imams having superpowers. According to quran, a man bought the Palace of sheehah before Prophet Sulaman blinked his eyes. He outshone the strongest jins. Please explain how an ordinary man not a prophet can do this?
it was a jinn, a powerful among the jinns who is called an ifrit, not a man. do you mean these verses in the quran? 27:38 [Solomon] said, "O assembly [of jinn], which of you will bring me her throne before they come to me in submission?" 27:39 A powerful one from among the jinn said, "I will bring it to you before you rise from your place, and indeed, I am for this [task] strong and trustworthy." please explain to me how did you figure that it was a man when it clearly states that a powerful jinn brought the throne to him huh?
@@fluidlessanimations8689 the jinn said "I will bring it to you before you rise from your place" but in the end the one who did it is not the jinn, but a wise man that can do it faster than the jinn (in a blink of an eye)
Brother Farid, I'm in no agreement with Sayyed Ammar but I would like to see a similar logic when it comes to all ahadith that you justify from al-bukhari n all others....they were too written after 200 years..... If you're honest apply the same rules to yourself n come towards the only truth that is the Quran n stop giving all other books place besides the quran....be honest or is it that you believe in what you've got as in that sense you have no justification in turning down sayyed Ammar' n their narrations.
Yes! This is the fallacy. Likewise, no one vouched for al-Farabari who was the sole transmitter of Bukhari. These guys are arguing over sources that have no authority. Man made authority! The Quran is indeed the Truth. There is no mention in the Quran about imamah being a lofty station, or that there'd be 12 successors. Alas, I left the Twelver madhab. I'm a Muslim that followers the Quran, and a hadith skeptic. I don't subscribe to any of these sects, hence nor their hadith corpus. They themselves are hadith skeptics as they reject each others hadiths.
@ShafqatjahanTabassum oh come on...isnaad, ilm e rajjal, sahih, mutawathir....your stuck on these....even between the sunni sects you pick n choose. One hadith works for 1 faction while others reject it...where r the ISNAANDS....and isnaads for something written 250 years later...I ask anyone to tell name of their ggg grandfather n 90%ppl don't know it n that's just 100years ago....stop blindly following the man made stories n belive in the only truth from our Lord...the Quran!! Salam
@@xj142 you clearly don't know what is isnaad , as isaad is something going back to prophet SAW from the narrator and its very deep study well we have biographies of narrators where they moved where they went how were they known among their circles whether they were good , or liar or etc..... And its a very complex sciences of hadith as a non muslim islamic scholars one's pot it as " certainly one of the most sophisticated study of sciences"
@@xj142 well you are correct 90% will not know their grand parents But certainty we do know grand parents of narrtors , their student their wife's, what work they did etc....😉 (Wrotten by hadiths scholrs or students of thise narrtirs or their friends etc during their life time thaht work is asmaat war rejaal(sry is spell mistake) And btw I am not haditist ik their limits and how they should be used as I am one of students of ahlul hadith , I am from school of thought of ahlul Quran and ahlul hadith
In the original Hadith it also says Islam will triumph under the caliphs (notice how it’s caliphs and not “spiritual leaders”) and even according to them their “imams” did taqiyya which was mainly practiced under the oppression of Quraysh.
Ask Twelver Shi’is the following: 1) Were Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA) legitimate Caliphs after the death of Rasool Allah Muhammad ﷺ? (They’ll probably say “No!”) 2) Was Islam triumphant during the tenures of Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA)? (They’ll probably say “No!” yet again.) 3) So was Ali (RAA) the true Caliph from the moment that Rasool Allah ﷺ died? (They’ll probably say “Yes!”) 4) So was Ali (RAA) the true Caliph during the combined 25-year tenure of Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA)? (They’ll probably say “Yes!” yet again.) 5) So if Islam was not triumphant for 25 years during the tenures of Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA), doesn’t that mean that Ali (RAA) also was not the legitimate caliph during those 25 years, since his legitimacy requires Islam to be triumphant during his tenure? (They’ll probably start sweating, and will try to walk back their previous answers, and will now claim that Islam _was_ triumphant during those 25 years.) 6) So if you’re now saying that Islam _was_ triumphant during the 25-year tenure of Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA), doesn’t that mean that they were the legitimate Caliphs? (At this point, they will have no clue what to say, since there’s no good way out of this dilemma for their dogmas, other than for them to admit that the original Sunni hadith, does nothing to help prove their so-called “infallible imamah with wilayah taqweeniyyah”.)
So you mean to tell me our Prophet (sawa) whi taught is everyrhing frpm salat to how to eat etc. Left out who woild lead the WHOLE UMMA? Seriously, whoever believes that is lost.
Well, Syedna Abu Bakr was asked to lead the prayer when Rasoolullah ﷺ was ill. He was his ﷺ companion during Hijra which is also mentioned in the Quran. And verse of the Quran ‘Allah is with us’ includes Syedna Abu Bakr with Rasoolullah ﷺ which elevates his status. May Allah be pleased with him.
Wallahi you’re a liar. Can you just encourage your viewers to watch SAN’s videos themselves and come back to comment on your videos? I bet you won’t like their comments after watching SAN😅
But when your so-called “infallible imams” say that taqiyyah is 9/10ths of the Twelver Imamiyyah Shi’a religion, and that he who doesn’t practice taqiyyah is devoid of religion, how can anyone believe anything that any of you say? The only Twelver Imamis today who seem to have set aside their taqiyyah are some of the akhbaris. Unfortunately however, the latter still use _buhtaan_ (slander) against their adversaries as a standard practice, so even they can’t be trusted to tell the truth either.
@@samy7013 😂😂😂 see another liar. When your authentic books are being used to disprove your salafi-wahabeast-umari-sunni religion, you’re here spewing lies and falsehood like farid himself. It’s no news to us that you guys are very closeminded and have little to no knowledge when it comes to Islam. Your arguments have always been based on hearsay and no evidence. Come back again broh!
have you visited speakers' corner and heard people like Mohammad hijab and the other Sunni shouters speak? DETROYING CHRISTIANS, DESTORYING SHIA, DESTOYING JEWS, is the title of all their videos haha and they just shout. Bet you all love mo hijab the professional shouter.
@@kingpiye7060 I see someone’s character never matters to you. Just their lisp. Their looks. Their clothes. You have a thing for hijab? Think he’s cute or something? I’m confused? Guys a paid activist that yells at everyone.
@@BigAck while I don't much like those titles, I'm yet to see any of their arguments being refuted, in general at least. Also do you have any proof of hijab being a paid activist? If not and I'm assuming you don't, then what does it say about you (if you call yourself a Muslim)
Common Farid...even the Sunnis could not prove who these 12 Amirs are and based on assumption, the Sunni scholars have produced names that are mind-boggling and unbelievable
And Yazid also was an alcoholic who murdered the family of the prophet, the grandson who was called the master of the paradise by the prophet himself! And yet he is your Imam!!!
So let me get this straight farid. You had a chance to clarify who the 12 imams are from your sources and you clearly can’t prove it. so you try to deflect and make it seem like the Shia can’t prove it from their books and try bringing them down with you. Pathetic honestly
No matter which school you go to for theology as long as you really believe in some unseen supernatural thing you can’t explain but expect others to believe then you are bias and not open to any intellectual discussion or criticism. Shia Islam has many logical issues it can’t answer , just have to accept it they claim …😮😮😮
One only needs to read Nawabakhti’s “Book of Shi’a Sects” and read about how the Shi’a fragmented and split into multiple groups after every “imam”, to realize that even the Shi’a had no clue who their “imams” were most of the time! 🤣😂😁
Why you followed the ummayad caliphs or the 4 imams of fiqh. Of course they claimed they are caliphs and Imams, but how did you know they were true caliphs and Imams? How do you know they were not usurpers and fake imams? Actually the names of the 12 Imams are already mentioned in the earliest shia Hadith collection known as kitab of sulaym.
Alhamdulilah, finally a response to this man Nakshwami, every single night of Ramadan spewing nonsense to his audience. Pls keep up the good work brother Farid.
Oh my God.this guy farid is really crazy.He wants to judge the shia hadith but he knows nothing about mustahul of shia hadith. He just through words and useless opinions.He ask about imam jawadi to prove his imama ,really? Just go an read the history of imams and you will never ask such question again
@@BigAckI think you're missing the point. Shia "Hadith" doesn't hold a candle to the sunni science of Hadith. Not even close. And so much is fabricated. You guys actively do shirk, mins boggles how you will absolutely do anything to uphold it.
Lets face it... Sayed Ammar might not have provided strong evidence on his claims but AT LEAST it holds more truths than the lists of the 12 that Sunni scholars come with. I'm not saying that Ammar showed strong evidence.. that's hard especially when you take into fact that Umar BANNED the writing of hadiths for many years. I'd like to see you analyze and counter the claims of Ammar's Ramadan series WITH your own facts using your literature.
@@mustafaal-dabagh9155 Honestly this guy's channel is just to hate on shias and praise umar 💀💀 He doesnt provide anyone with useful information at all.
Are you Shi’is for real? We Sunnis aren’t the ones who consider “infallible imamah and wilayah taqweeniyyah” to be usul of the deen. You’re the ones making these wild claims about your so-called “infallible imams”, so you bring your evidence. It’s the central pillar of _YOUR_ religion, not ours.
The claims that Imams have some “ hidden knowledge “ is nonsense and contradicts reality . Why do they say that when non of the teachings of any Imams reflects any scientific findings or any scientific knowledge that could have benefited humanity to protect against diseases and knowledge about our planet and solar system and the universe .? all big claims and no evidence.😮 That makes me so angry 😠. Just big talks about how great these Imams are and how supernatural power they have .!😮
I will also note that the original version of the hadith at 14:02 also is narrated by Imam Ja'far as Sadiq (6th imam) while in the al-Kafi version it is Muhammad al Jawad (9th imam). The original chain is marfu' in al Mahaasin, so it definitely isn't strong evidence anymore!
But it's a directly represents their faith oddly enough. Let's pick on organized praying and label Umar RA a "mushrik" astagfurullah, but he will do videos literally leading his flock astray. The irony is off the charts
Lol, these wahabi gang members cannot all together handle an orator syed ammar, syed ammar made these salafi guys forget taraweeh and kept them busy trying hard to refute 😂😂 this came from a man who is not even a debator but just a shia orator, whats gonna happen if an actual shia debator starts making vidoes
Are you Shi’is for real? We Sunnis aren’t the ones who consider “infallible imamah and wilayah taqweeniyyah” to be usul of the deen. You’re the ones making these wild claims about your so-called “infallible imams”, so you bring your evidence. It’s the central pillar of _YOUR_ religion, not ours.
Wow buddy. Looks like a Shia might finally understand at least one aspect of Hadith. Congratulations. You're officially better than most of the people compiling and studying Shia hadith.
No, the video Farid was watching Ammar said that his focus was to inform Shia more about the imams with Shia Hadith. He wasn’t trying to convince sunnis about imamah.
Screaming "Ya Aowli, Ya Aowli,"..asking everything from Ali radhiyallahu anhu.. Eating mud at Najaf.... Slapping with sword and knifes at their own back like Christian... And they not even realize or rather too stupid that even Ali radhiyallahu anhu unable to defend himself from Ibn Muljam..
you have shown from your comments and they are --- due to your sheer perfect ignorance, super scarece little knowledfe & a super mumbi jumbo weak minds and to weak faith and lack of certainty... the religion you follow is from abu bakr & umar (read saqifa incident). read quran 5;67.. which makes it clear about who you should follow after PBUH. Umar ^ abu bakr made 1st sect in islam, the people who stayed with Ali (as) remained in islam. also read tabari sunni book clearly states the propaganda at saqifa and these thug had gone at amximum klength to defend that. lol about Ibn Muljam. Imam Ali knew Ibn Muljam had a sword and he will struck, i finkk mrnergula was born in wahabi famil since u dont know Qadr, eschatology, premonition, & miraj. Imam Ali could ave sliced up all these hypcrites sahabas but the bigger picture was to protect islam and the last words of PBUH to him about patience, actually Fatmia (as) got angry at abu bakr and the GOd's wrath was about to hit abu bakr & umar but Imam ali tried to calm down Fatima (as) during those days after saqifa. Firstly, PBUH and his family are not normal human beings, they were speical creations whom by default know the secret of the universerve. PLus u meed to worry about yourself as how u deny Quran 5;67 and became an abu bakr & umar follower? and you agree , follow and take side of them who were materialistic, corrupted. super hypocrotes (incuded in 12 hypcrites bty abu hudaifah in sunni books), evildoers, dislloyall to the pBUH, misled people, deceivers and upgradedto new islam to islam 1.0 (caliphate islam).
31. From Muhammad son of Wahban from Abi Huraira about the saying of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم):"Whoever wants to live my life and die my death, let him follow Ali son of Abi Taleb and follow the way of the Imams after him, the number of Asbaat(grandsons of Jacob are 12)." The Imams are 12 from the children of Ali (عليه السلام). so their count in total are 13. Sirat AlMustaqeem-AlBayaathi v.2 p.114
Because of people like you, sectarianism has become a cancer. Farid was respectful and fair in his dealings with you, and then a person like you who has lost many brain cells comes to say something like that
As an added point, Ammar Nakshawani studied Islamic Studies but did not go through formal Hawza training. A lot of those graduates of Hawza training perform Taqiyah, and make a judgement on when it's appropriate to reveal what they were taught about the true history of Islam as taught in the Hawza. Each of the named Imams performed miracles, particularly in front of each major Caliph of their time, so they would have no excuse before Allah SWT when asked why they didn't turn over the caliphate to the Imam, the rightful leader of the Islamic Ummah.
Leave this subject. Sunn ,Shia that's all you can talk about. Other Shia.sects don't accept 12 imam, they have thier own imams. Abd this 12th one disappeared. 1300 yrs ago. Leave it. Jews love this.
@@slothinator5552 Yes, obsessed. His last few videos have ALL been about taking snippets of SAN’s videos and then giving his own opinion rather than a textual discussion. And the reason Shia scholars are making videos like this is because he is educating our young Shia. He has said it in the videos that he isn’t making it to convert Sunnis. Our Shia have been persecuted for centuries for our beliefs and it’s about time the Shia dropped the inferiority complex completely and know that our beliefs are entrenched in the books of others as well as our own.
Search, find, read and understand the complete Sermon of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh&hf) at Ghadir Khum. Not only the WILAYA (successor) Ameer-ul-Momineen (a.s.) was announced, BUT also the Wilayas (successors) after Ameer-ul-Momineen Imam Ali Ibne Abi Talib (a.s.) the 11 holy Imams names were mentioned. Indeed Allah (s.w.t.) does not guide the faithless/unbelievers.
Another brainwashed headbeater. You say search but don't know what to....... Also about Ghadir, He (saw) was expressing support to Ali ra when another sahabi accused him of unjust distribution back in yemen. Even if he would do so why wouldn't he do it back at haj? Also he never said anything about other 11 if so show hadith ( don't just copy anything bring its isnad too). Also here is a cherry on top against your hate mullahs teach you against Sahabas(AS) : As for the foremost-the first of the MUHAJIROON and the ANSAR and those who follow them in goodness, Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him. And He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow, to stay there for ever and ever. That is the ultimate triumph Quran 9:100 Now i ask you same Search, find & read, read Quran and stop blindly following mullahs and come to Islam.
Sheikh please if you have an aproch to sheikh Adan Rasheed then please make him ready to respond allayari rafidi in Urdu language!! Jazakumullah khaiir
If I were a sunni, I would look into my own literature as Sayed mentions, look in those references that he gives and be the judge, don’t listen to this guy, judge by your own. In the end it’s you who are responsible for you actions not others. Stop being ignorant and look into you own books and then judge the behavior of Abu Bakr and Omar generally. what they did to the house of Fatima(AS) should be enough, there a few incidents that should make it easy for you to see that those two wanted something else from the whole beginning. As sayed says, how do I expect Sunni Muslim to have anything mentioned in their books when they rejected the first one, it was clearly 2 groups back then, the house of Fatima (AS) and then Abu Bakr and Umar. As for some that says Ali (AS) gave Bayyah to Abu Bakr, he gave it after Fatima (AS) died according to Sunni literature. How come that it was an election with Abu Bakr, not with Omar, but with Othman? How can Abu Bakr pass the khilafa to Omar but Omar won’t do the same? How can we follow people that are capable of doing mistake? Omar changed the some rules in the religion because he thought it was good for the religion, how can he do that? Everything that the prophet (SAW) said should be the same.
Dearest Farid, I’ve recently been struggling with faith and found some ahadith about the prophet may peace be upon him telling Ali ra that there will be a matter between him and aisha, and he also told his wives that the dogs of al Hawab will be barking at one of them. Can you confirm the authenticity of these ahadith? If proven authentic, then you will have proven that Islam is the ultimate religion of God without a question or doubt. Making that video would absolutely change my life and thousand of others, please do consider it. If you don’t wish to make a video. Kindly answer me in the comments if you wish. Assalamu alaikum
@@fluidlessanimations8689 assalamu alaikum, yes no doubt there. I never said it was a condemnation I just want to know if these prophecies are sahih (authentic) because I don’t see any of the Muslim scholars and debaters talk about it.
@@thoraxg4895 assalamu alaikum, of course Reported by Qais bn abi Hazim : أقبلت عائشة مرت ببعض مياه بني عامر طرقتهم ليلا فسمعت نباح الكلاب فقالت أي ماء هذا قالوا ماء الحوأب قالت ما أظنني إلا راجعة قالوا مهلا يرحمك الله تقدمين فيراك المسلمون فيصلح الله بك قالت ما أظنني إلا راجعة إني سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم يقول كيف بإحداكن تنبح عليها كلاب الحوأب Al Saduq has a report in his book Man La Yahduruhu al Faqih via his isnad: أن جيش عائشة مروا بماء يقال له ماء الحوأب فنبحتهم كلابه فقالت عائشة ما هذا الماء فقال بعضهم ماء الحوأب فقالت عائشة إنا لله و إنا إليه راجعون ردوني ردوني هذا الماء الذي قال لي رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم لا تكوني التي تنبحك كلاب الحوأب فأتاها القوم بمن شهد و أقسم أن هذا الماء ليس بماء الحوأب
Do you speak Arabic? There are tons of good Arabic videos that you can watch on the topic, that will put your heart at ease. You can also find English language books for free on the web (such as at the Mahajjah Institute-highly recommended!) that discuss this topic clearly and comprehensively, and will resolve all your doubts.
Your line of arguments does not stand. I advise you to read, specially read quran, tafsir and sincerely ask Allah SWT to guide you, rather than making such baseless arguments
In the terminological sense, the Sahabah (R.A.) refers to those fortunate people who were blessed with the sight of the Messenger of God (PBUH) in the state of faith and became dear to Allah in the state of faith.... According to hadiths, whoever recites the word la ilaha illallah Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah is a Muslim. Is everyone who has seen Einstein a professor of physics today? If not, then how can anyone who has seen the Messenger of Allah become a religious scholar? Below we will see the types of Companions of the Holy Prophet from the Holy Quran The Holy Qur'an has divided the Companions of the Messenger into different categories, and it does not matter whether a person is a Badri or a non-Badri, believed before Hudaybiyyah or after Hudaybiyyah, before the conquest of Makkah came among the Muslims or the conquest. After Mecca. Therefore, the real faces of these groups have been mentioned in the Holy Quran as follows: 1. The famous hypocrites (Surah Al-Munafiqun, verse 1). 2. A deceiver and a cunning hypocrite (Surah Towbah, verse 101). 3. Patients with hearts (Surah Ahzab, verse 12). 4. Those who listen to the words of the enemies who spread fitnah (Surah Towbah, verse 45-47). 5. Those who do good and bad deeds (Surat al-Tawbah, verse 102). 6. Apostates (Surah Al-Imran, verse 154). 7. Except for the believers, those who have been accepted (Surah Hujarat, verse 14). 8. Mawulfah al-Qulub (Surah Towbah, verse 60). 9. Fasiq (Surah Hujarat, verse 6). 10. At the time of war, those who turn their backs on the disbelievers and run away (Surah Anfal, verse 15, 16). Where the Holy Qur'an has promised paradise for following the Companions of the Prophet, the same Qur'an has forbidden following the hypocrites. Surah Towa 100. And among the emigrants and the Ansar, those who excelled first, and those who followed them in good conduct, Allah was pleased with them, and they were pleased with Allah, and Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which rivers flow. They will flow in them forever and this is the great achievement. Surah Ahzab 1. O Prophet, fear Allah and do not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites. Indeed, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise. Note: ___ When the hypocrites come to you, they say: We bear witness that you are indeed the Messenger of Allah, and Allah knows that you are indeed His Messenger, and Allah bears witness that these hypocrites are indeed liars. ) If there were hypocrites among the Companions of the Prophet, there were some who came to him and testified that he was the Prophet of God. God has forbidden to obey the hypocrites, then how can the consensus of the Companions of the Prophet be a proof? [Surah Maida verse 10:10. And those who disbelieved and denied Our revelations are the people of Hell.]_________________ 1. Surah Al-Imran: 144. Result____:@ "It is wrong to call the Sahaba RA wrong and it is also wrong to call the wrong Sahaba" __@ Only those who disbelieve dispute in the Ayat of Allah, so let them be troubled by their confusion in the land. (4) Translation: Kanzalaiman They do not dispute in the verses of Allah, but the disbelievers, so do not be deceived by their wandering in the cities, O listener. "Read carefully again" The Sunni sect is over❤
Farid - would you not say the same happens in our literature of hadith. An earlier report is shorter but a later report gives more details. But we accept both.
It's the same sanad and the same narration with a different matn. It shows that stuff was tampered with. If you read our literature there is a difference in isnad usually regarding the same report
@@Spined1234 Because Al Kulayni needed to fabricate evidence to support his theological beliefs, so he took the same sanad and just added the rest of the names and graded it sahih.
@@Mehmet_Fateh We as Sunnis believe that their 4th imam Ali ibn Hussayn r.a was asked about Abu bakr r.a and Umar r.a and he defended them so a group of the Shia declared someone else the imam
Strange first they do away with eldest son Hasan's progeny from Imamat and start it from the mixed blood of Yazd Gerd, then almost all so called Imams had issues with their brothers over Imamat like Baqir. Even they weren't sure 😃
@@HR-313but he has a point PhD of western uni doesn't equate to classical Islamic studies. Completely different, that's why he avoids actual debates with learned.
This article destroy Sunnite/suffite islam In the terminological sense, the Sahabah (R.A.) refers to those fortunate people who were blessed with the sight of the Messenger of God (PBUH) in the state of faith and became dear to Allah in the state of faith.... According to hadiths, whoever recites the word la ilaha illallah Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah is a Muslim. Is everyone who has seen Einstein a professor of physics today? If not, then how can anyone who has seen the Messenger of Allah become a religious scholar? Below we will see the types of Companions of the Holy Prophet from the Holy Quran The Holy Qur'an has divided the Companions of the Messenger into different categories, and it does not matter whether a person is a Badri or a non-Badri, believed before Hudaybiyyah or after Hudaybiyyah, before the conquest of Makkah came among the Muslims or the conquest. After Mecca. Therefore, the real faces of these groups have been mentioned in the Holy Quran as follows: 1. The famous hypocrites (Surah Al-Munafiqun, verse 1). 2. A deceiver and a cunning hypocrite (Surah Towbah, verse 101). 3. Patients with hearts (Surah Ahzab, verse 12). 4. Those who listen to the words of the enemies who spread fitnah (Surah Towbah, verse 45-47). 5. Those who do good and bad deeds (Surat al-Tawbah, verse 102). 6. Apostates (Surah Al-Imran, verse 154). 7. Except for the believers, those who have been accepted (Surah Hujarat, verse 14). 8. Mawulfah al-Qulub (Surah Towbah, verse 60). 9. Fasiq (Surah Hujarat, verse 6). 10. At the time of war, those who turn their backs on the disbelievers and run away (Surah Anfal, verse 15, 16). Where the Holy Qur'an has promised paradise for following the Companions of the Prophet, the same Qur'an has forbidden following the hypocrites. Surah Towa 100. And among the emigrants and the Ansar, those who excelled first, and those who followed them in good conduct, Allah was pleased with them, and they were pleased with Allah, and Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which rivers flow. They will flow in them forever and this is the great achievement. Surah Ahzab 1. O Prophet, fear Allah and do not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites. Indeed, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise. Note: ___ When the hypocrites come to you, they say: We bear witness that you are indeed the Messenger of Allah, and Allah knows that you are indeed His Messenger, and Allah bears witness that these hypocrites are indeed liars. ) If there were hypocrites among the Companions of the Prophet, there were some who came to him and testified that he was the Prophet of God. God has forbidden to obey the hypocrites, then how can the consensus of the Companions of the Prophet be a proof? [Surah Maida verse 10:10. And those who disbelieved and denied Our revelations are the people of Hell.]_________________ 1. Surah Al-Imran: 144. Result____:@ "It is wrong to call the Sahaba RA wrong and it is also wrong to call the wrong Sahaba" __@ Only those who disbelieve dispute in the Ayat of Allah, so let them be troubled by their confusion in the land. (4) Translation: Kanzalaiman They do not dispute in the verses of Allah, but the disbelievers, so do not be deceived by their wandering in the cities, O listener. "Read carefully again" The Sunni sect is over
Concocted . Circular reasoning. Begging the question. Ali (rta) in the presence of Abu Bakr (rta) and umar(rta). So he invokes Khidr, why not just a random person. Confabulations!
From Muhammad son of Wahban from Abi Huraira about the saying of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم):"Whoever wants to live my life and die my death, let him follow Ali son of Abi Taleb and follow the way of the Imams after him, the number of Asbaat(grandsons of Jacob are 12)." The Imams are 12 from the children of Ali (عليه السلام). so their count in total are 13. Sirat AlMustaqeem-AlBayaathi v.2 p.114
It is not proved that al-Kulayni is just filling in names; al-Barqi seems to imply his list is not exhaustive. So perhaps al-Kulayni is simply giving the full account accurately. But this doesn't prove he is in fact relaying a genuine account, either.
It's still tampering with the hadith. And it makes no sense why the Shia muhadetheen would randomly remove the names of the 12 imams of highly important hadith.
@@Spined1234 No, it doesn't have to be tampering. What was written was implied to not be exhaustive: it is not random removal. Oftentimes people don't reference all the hadith they know or don't list the isnad if they already have it somewhere, etc. Hadith have an oral life, not just a written one, so a fuller hadith later written down doesn't mean an earlier, truncated hadith that was written was then tampered with by the later source, especially if the earlier one explicitly says the tradition they are relating is truncated and incomplete. Once again, this isn't to say it is authentic. But it doesn't prove inauthenticity
@@1001011011010 It makes absolutely no sense why the Shia would randomly remove the names of the 12 imams in a highly important hadith considering that Imamah is one of, if not the most important tenet in their faith. The only explanation that makes sense is that this hadith originally did not mention the 12 imams and later Shiee authors came along and inserted their own list into it. This is strong evidence that the hadith was tampered by the Shia, which is common with a lot of their hadiths.
@@Spined1234 It wasn't randomly removed, listen to the hadith again. It just doesn't list them all out; the list of people is not listed out itemized, but it is described.
@@1001011011010 Again, why would the Shia NOT list the names of the 12 imams when that is the most single important aspect of this hadith? So the shiee muhadith receives this amazing hadith listing all the 12 imams and then just decides to exclude all of them for some reason. Yeah sorry I'm having a lot of trouble buying this story especially when the Shia often use this hadith as evidence for their imamah. I need a better explanation as to why the earlier Shia hadith did not mention the names of the 12 imams. This isn't even mentioning the issue that the Imams themselves did not use this hadith as proof of their Imamah.
Is it just me or are (some) Twelver 'hadiths' just cut, edited, and pasted with a Shi'a flavor to suit their needs? Anyone who knows anything about ahadeeth knows that the Shi'a 'hadith' quoted sounds awfully a lot like when Jibra'eel (AS) visited Rasul ﷺ and asked him questions about the Deen in the presence of the Sahaba (RA).
No difference, except the name. Shi’is actually believe that their “infallible imams” are superior to all of the Prophets, except Muhammad ﷺ, and even the latter deference to Rasool Allah ﷺ is just lip-service. They ascribe alleged virtues to their “infallible imams” far higher than what they ascribe to Rasool Allah Muhammad ﷺ.
Salam, Can you make a video on 33:33 and that um salama hadith and wether this ayah speaks including the wives or not? Ive seen sunni interpretations saying both. Or point me to a video that does. Jazakallah khair, i appreciate all the work you do
![Debunking Shia Claim: Abu Bakr and Omar killed Fatima!! [Mahdi Modarresi]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/u92BmUM3rxM/mqdefault.jpg)
Shias watching this video should set a time limit for themselves depending on how much time they have.
Do you think it is reasonable to find evidence for each of the Twelve Imams in a week? Two weeks? A month?
Set a reasonable limit and force yourself to find an answer within that time. If you are unable to find sufficient proof, then I invite you to the path of the Prophet (peace be upon him).
الله اكبر
Spoilers: You won't find any credible/sahih narration at all with the names of all imams.
There I saved you all the trouble imposed on you by Farid. Follow Mohammed ﷺ and his companions as you were ordered in the Quran. :)
@@HA-td3uw 🤝
You may have made some good points that I can’t question, since I don’t much about the narrators.
However, all 11 Imams were murdered. Some were imprisoned, most were poisoned and one of them was massacred at Karbala. Can you explain why they were murdered? Because the way I see it to that question is there are two logical answers, either: a passionate hate for the Ahlulbayt, due to association with the Prophet SAW or because those 11 men were important and there is a deeper reason as to why Ummayd and Abbasid caliphs would spy on them until they’d have them poisoned.
Also if it’s not these specific 12 men, then it must be another 12 men, according to Sunnis Hadiths as well.
Farid: Avoid these self-appointments, where the Imam is appointing himself. And if the Imam is asking for one-fifth of your stuff, then that is sus.
Mohammed (pbuh): I have been appointed as Prophet. And btw, the war booty is for Allah and me (Quran 8:1). One-fifth is for Allah and me.
If the imams have knowledge of everything up to the hour then they must know when the hour is since the hour would be as soon as they no longer possess knowledge
Allah(swt) said in the Qur'an that he alone have the knowledge of the hour
@@IrfanAhmad-uv4ul yes of course but I’m saying if the Shia position is the 12 imams have knowledge of the future right up until the hour then it stands to reason they know the hour is right as soon as their knowledge of the future ends, they’re making the assertion that they know the hour by default
This in itself is shirk and no longer is Islam since ALLAH ALONE has all the knowledge (past, present, future) because if these so called imams also have the same knowledge Allah no longer remains a necessary being
According to quran, a man bought the Palace of sheehah before Prophet Sulaman blinked his eyes. He outshone the strongest jins. Please explain how an ordinary man not a prophet can do this? are you saying tis man wassuperman?
@@ghul8158 which verse are you talking about
Islamic "scholar" with his whole body full of tattoos 🙄
This is why I don't take Shi'ism seriously 😑
Maybe he had them when he wasn't religious
@@justsomeone8899apparently it's makrooh in shiism
@@JohnJohn-tn3lcno they consider it halal, Sistani said it. But I think the tattoes got more while he got more religious
And when people can't prove you wrong they target your appearance. 😂 where's your evidence of tattoos being haram?
@@Deeneda Islam
Timestamps-
Some superpowers of "imams"
• 2:10 imams have knowledge about past and present
•2:29 imams have access to angels
•2:43 imams know when the previous imam dies
•4:28 imp.
6:50 1st "proof" by nakshawani
problems-
•isnad problem(ibrahim bin hashim being weak narrator)
•muhammad jawad is appointing his son as
the imam but the problem is jawad's imamah is unproved
So if he appoint his son as an imam it means nothing
9:54 second "proof" by nakjawani
Problems-
•al barqi's books predates al kulayni's book al kafi by 50 years and it gives the same report but it only mentions 3 people instead of 12 It seems like al-kulayni fabricated everything.i.e the report is fabricated
Most probably,Al barqi has the original report with only 3 imams and al kulayni just filled the gaps
•this report has been reported by Al Jawad himself (at 15:41 )
do some basic research on Sunni persecution of Shias during the Abbasids and Umayyad eras.
@@masteronmace W Umayyad But L abbaside
Inb4 "I am a sunni muslim but........"
and who would have thought? (They turn out to be half quranist and half west liberal and come from a sufi/shia(anything besides actually sunni salafi) background)
He turned off the comment section on his video :D
Ammar nakjawani cheerleade incoming.......😰
3......2......1.......
Shocking, can't even take him to someone's house for a marriage proposal
Why do these Shi'a guys have a same way of speaking? I don't like the way they speak.
They speak with nose
@@ManhaJSalafeeSalam alaikum when someone clicking on your channel, Un-Islamic things appear, especially with the name of your channel that does not match it. Advice, remove it for known reasons. If I could advise you secretly, I would do so, but this is not available to me at all.( subscriptions)
they speak with tajweed or something
@@abasinnazimshah4598 probably the Iraqi Accent
I don’t like the way you speak either
Umar ibn al-Khattab (ra) reported: The Messenger of Allah (saw) said, “Verily, among what I fear most for my nation is every hypocrite with a knowledgeable tongue.” (Musnad Ahmad)
أخرج البيهقي في السنن الكبرى: أخبرنا أبو الحسين بن بشران العدل ببغداد أنا إسماعيل بن محمد الصفار ثنا الحسن بن علي بن عفان ثنا ابن نمير عن عبيد الله بن عمر عن نافع عن ابن عمر أنه كان إذا اشترى جارية كشف عن ساقها ووضع يده بين ثدييها وعلى عجزها، وكأنه كان يضعها عليها من وراء الثوب
The names of the 12 imams is written in Masjid Nabawi
In Majsid Nabawi are names of AbuBakr,Umar,Uthman too
I crossed paths with him during his time in Hartford. He was the “cool Imam” during the height of the interfaith dialogue era. He used to do a lot of “well, these terrorists are actually Sunnis, let me tell you about Shi’ism” routine”. He has gotten very popular
He’s not wrong about that
wait are the terrorists not sunnis? did he lie or smth?
@@mustafaal-dabagh9155 terrorists are not sunnis they're wahhabis, hence out of the fold of islam
@@mustafaal-dabagh9155 yea they arent sunnis, they are wahhabis.
@@heromahdi bro he keeps deleting my comments it’s funny 😭😭
The you ask me "excellent excellent question" always gets me😂
Why does he speak like that lol
He drank a redbull can 🤷🏽♂️
You should hear him speaking about george floyd, look it up and have a laugh
*Youpuncturedtheark* refutes all the claims of the Rafidha
read "Narrations with Names of the Twelve Imams" written by Farid.
May Allah keep you sincere.
Great work once again.
I have to download this video because it feels like it could be taken down for how truthful it is 😂
Infallible leaders sounds is how Christians ended up worshipping Esah as.
Even rasoolullah made mistakes ('he frowned') etc.
Frowned?
@@ponderingspirit1475 see tafsir of Surah Abasa
@@ponderingspirit1475hes referring to surah abasa
Number 80
That was uthman who frowned not the prophet stop the lies
@@tam3133 why are you lying?
May Allah bless you Farid, an excellent concise video that should get all Shias thinking.
May Allah guide the sincere shias to the truth
Farid, respectfully, you failed to disprove nakshawani's video about the twelve imams 😂 anyone who watches the full lecture without any bias will understand where the twelve imams from the shia theology comes from
Not falling for these "insufficient response" when this is what Nakshawani presented throughout the whole. At first, I thought you guys were sincere in this but I can see through the coping without refuting.
@@everythingandroidois it’s ok no one’s forcing you to watch the lecture, if you trust everything in this video to be 100% correct then that’s your choice.
yes it comes from majloosi enemies of Islam
They come from Ibn Sabaah, the Jew.
It comes from the @55
I think it's high time someone focused on Nakhshwani, please continue this brother Farid
@sunnah_discourse also has great videos on Nakshawnies "Islamic" series which is him lying for hours
Honestly,He doesn't worth time
@@malaminekamara4079 everything he brings is truth alhamdullalh and all the sunnis are becoming shia
April fools is in a few weeks @@mustafaal-dabagh9155
@@mustafaal-dabagh9155 congratulations on your victory 😂😂😂
What's funny is that we have multiple Shiee hadiths in which people would come up to the Imams and ask them who the next Imam is or if there even will be another Imam. If they already had access to a hadith which states the 12 imams by name then it makes no sense why they would ask the Imams these questions.
I think you forgot to use a brain when you wrote this.
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 Nah but you evidently forgot to use yours when typing out your rebuttal.
Ja’afar Al-Sadiq, in two separate narrations, says that the Imam does not pass away until Allah tells him who the next Imam will be. (Al-Kulayni 1/166)
Why would he need Allah to tell him who the next Imam is if there already was an authentic hadith with all 12 imams mentioned in it?
@@Spined1234 bro what are you talking about? Are you saying there was an authetic hadith existing during the time of the Rasulullah SAW where all 12 imams are listed by name?
Prophet muhmmad already said Ali is your maula, then from Ali (as) he said who the next maula will be and so on. And only Allah appoints his leaders
@@gr3en_jamfatima295 Maula is not Imam. Nobody at the time of the Prophet peace be upon him understood "Maula" to mean divinely appointed infallible imam.
And no, there is no authentic hadith from the Prophet peace be upon him in which he states there will be 12 divinely appointed infallible imams starting with Ali.
@@Spined1234 yeah maula means friend because Prophet Muhammad saw stopped everyone at khums in the heat just to say Ali is my friend, and Ali is your friend. Everything the Prophet SAW says is by the wishes of Allah and Allah SWT had commanded him to say infront of everyone that Imam Ali (as) is your leader.
You guys think anyone can be a religious guidance of the ummah. No sunni can consistently tell me how a leader is appointed. Some say it's because abu bakr lead prayers, others say the ummah decide amongst themselves like a democracy and others argue that Prophet Muhammad SAW told abu bakr directly.
Did you even listen to his lecture? You are really making fool of yourself
He clearly didn’t 😂
@@sammirzad what is his problem, nobody told him to leave sunnism. Why is he so so defensive that it just doesn't make sense anymore
@@aln339 they are rattled by the daily lectures exposing “sunni” theology
@@sammirzad stop embarrassing yourself. Shites are not Muslims
@@aln339 stop embarrassing yourself. Shites are not Muslims
Nice to see you and a few brothers teaming up to disprove the nonsense these Shia spread, nothing but speculation, conjecture and conspiracy, of course the bots will defend them regardless but may Allah reward the Muslims fighting to defend the truth
“Nothing but speculation, conjecture, and conspiracy” while he’s using the Sahih books lmaoooo so you’re saying your own Hadiths are nothing but conjecture, conspiracy, and speculation? Got it
Verse 1:5 of the Quran is more than enough to disprove those Mushreqen
And surah tahrim is more than enough to tell you aisha and hafsa were mushreqen 😃 66:4
That Verse don't justify the Shirk of Shiasm@@sammirzad
@achraf9946 but you follow whom Allah condemns. How cute. Infact you take your whole faith from her ❤
Is your mother available for mutah? I heard she takes 15$ for 3 Days lol.
First prove that umar Abubakar n Usman where not mushrikeen then come n tell us....the one who said quran is enough for us went to saqifa to elect a Khalifa if quran is enough y the hell u went to get selected
The 12er Shia concept of Imamah is similar to the Sikh concept of Guru.
Yeah not even close
@@HR-313 I acknowledge there are differences. However here are the similarities:
Both schools faced persecution against Sunni imperialism.
Both schools have a divine appointment concept which is unique and cannot be traced in history.
Imam is a term used but historically there are no Imams like the 12.
Likewise Guru is a term used before but there are no Gurus like the 10.
In additions there were some other Ahlul Bayt who claimed Imamate and declared kaffirs by the Imamis. Likewise within the Sikhs members of Guru line always claimed there they are the Gurus. They too are condemned by Sikhs.
In the 5th Guru's time the oldest son of the 4th Guru claimed he was the Guru.
For 12er Shia Imam Jafar disowned his son Abdullah for Imamate.
The strange part it some Sikhs believe in Guru Gobind Singh will return. Likewise the 12ers are waiting for the Mahdi' s return.
Lastly Sikhs have a Guru that became Guru before baligh. This is the 8th Guru. Likewise the same case with 12er Shias where some Imams became Imams before baligh.
Likewise one of the Gurus also disowned his son for claiming to be a Guru.
May Allah show you the right part brother farid second don't put half video please put the full video and he has proof you from your books
So who knows our books, a Shia who lies or sunnis? You don't even have books of our equivalent! You don't have any idea of the standard they are and how they are to be used with context of actual history, NOT your emotional non provable history
The full video is a waste of time. 😂
Especially in Ramadan
Bro is waffling on a regular basis now. SAN has him so rattled he’s not even making sense anymore
Looks to me Shia's are rattled, multiple comments on this video but no answers? he kindly asked you to reflect on your own books, your own evidences, instead your focus is here on the comment section.
“Waffling” lmao 😂 that’s all Nakhshwani does
May Allah guide to see, speak and accept the truth.
Bring evidence or accept Islam upon Sunnah.
Farid, all your rebuttals are weak, come up with something better 😂
Whenever he can’t disprove something he says the Hadith is “weak or not enough evidence” 😂
@@sammirzadtypical of this guy
Stop embarrassing yourself. Shites are not Muslims
You clearly just watched the video to argue and not learn. There has never been a clearer refutation
@@OnePullUpKing bruhhh his heading of the video there's no proofs in shia works but at the end quotes alkafi which specifically mentions all 12 by name. Irrespective how hurt he feels by it, it was a click bait by farid and he gotcha
Wait so in 14:33 in the Sunni book, Al khithr literally says to Hassan (as) that your father (Ali) is the successor of the prophet!
That’s not a Sunni book that’s there books
Its noy sunni book. Its shia book (fabrication)
Our prophet SA told us cleary on many occasions who is his successor, if you dont even accept the 1st imam Ali AS . Your questions end there.
Evidence?
@saracenii so going against the prophet is someone who you revere
@saracenii here we go playing the insult card. Where have i insulted any1
@farid you’ve not done well either. I have been following your responses trying to find out the truth but you’re not doing a good job either. Nakshwani said he doesn’t want to convert anyone. He is telling you to stick to yours and he to his and don’t call each other infidels. You Muslims are a funny bunch.
Sometimes I think, you’re in awe of Mr. Nakshwani and maybe just trying to respond to all his lectures, weakly I must add, so you can gain fame and prestige perhaps? I hope you’re not doing it for the clicks.
Stop embarrassing yourself
Oh no I’m sure you’re such a legitimate knowledge seeker just trying to find out the truth. Get out of here you kadhab.
Nakhshwani presents extremely weak evidence and then extrapolates an unsubstantiated conclusion to support his views.
@@arabianknight0000😂😂😂
You haven't responded to any of Farid's arguments
@@abhmd4481I can see no arguments 🤷♂️
Alot of people talking about imams having superpowers. According to quran, a man bought the Palace of sheehah before Prophet Sulaman blinked his eyes. He outshone the strongest jins. Please explain how an ordinary man not a prophet can do this?
it was a jinn, a powerful among the jinns who is called an ifrit, not a man. do you mean these verses in the quran?
27:38 [Solomon] said, "O assembly [of jinn], which of you will bring me her throne before they come to me in submission?"
27:39 A powerful one from among the jinn said, "I will bring it to you before you rise from your place, and indeed, I am for this [task] strong and trustworthy."
please explain to me how did you figure that it was a man when it clearly states that a powerful jinn brought the throne to him huh?
So your imams are jins 😂😂😂😂
@@fluidlessanimations8689his masoomi imams are jins
@@fluidlessanimations8689 the jinn said "I will bring it to you before you rise from your place" but in the end the one who did it is not the jinn, but a wise man that can do it faster than the jinn (in a blink of an eye)
@@MalikL3no. But shia's 12th imam is the Dajjal himself
Incredible work Masha'Allah brother. This knowledge is paramount for us to know.
What knowledge?
Brother Farid, I'm in no agreement with Sayyed Ammar but I would like to see a similar logic when it comes to all ahadith that you justify from al-bukhari n all others....they were too written after 200 years.....
If you're honest apply the same rules to yourself n come towards the only truth that is the Quran n stop giving all other books place besides the quran....be honest or is it that you believe in what you've got as in that sense you have no justification in turning down sayyed Ammar' n their narrations.
Yes! This is the fallacy. Likewise, no one vouched for al-Farabari who was the sole transmitter of Bukhari. These guys are arguing over sources that have no authority. Man made authority! The Quran is indeed the Truth. There is no mention in the Quran about imamah being a lofty station, or that there'd be 12 successors. Alas, I left the Twelver madhab. I'm a Muslim that followers the Quran, and a hadith skeptic. I don't subscribe to any of these sects, hence nor their hadith corpus. They themselves are hadith skeptics as they reject each others hadiths.
We have isnaads they don't
@ShafqatjahanTabassum oh come on...isnaad, ilm e rajjal, sahih, mutawathir....your stuck on these....even between the sunni sects you pick n choose. One hadith works for 1 faction while others reject it...where r the ISNAANDS....and isnaads for something written 250 years later...I ask anyone to tell name of their ggg grandfather n 90%ppl don't know it n that's just 100years ago....stop blindly following the man made stories n belive in the only truth from our Lord...the Quran!! Salam
@@xj142 you clearly don't know what is isnaad , as isaad is something going back to prophet SAW from the narrator and its very deep study well we have biographies of narrators where they moved where they went how were they known among their circles whether they were good , or liar or etc.....
And its a very complex sciences of hadith as a non muslim islamic scholars one's pot it as " certainly one of the most sophisticated study of sciences"
@@xj142 well you are correct 90% will not know their grand parents
But certainty we do know grand parents of narrtors , their student their wife's, what work they did etc....😉
(Wrotten by hadiths scholrs or students of thise narrtirs or their friends etc during their life time thaht work is asmaat war rejaal(sry is spell mistake)
And btw I am not haditist ik their limits and how they should be used as I am one of students of ahlul hadith , I am from school of thought of ahlul Quran and ahlul hadith
16:00
"I would like a fifth of your income btw"
😂😂😂😂😂
In the original Hadith it also says Islam will triumph under the caliphs (notice how it’s caliphs and not “spiritual leaders”) and even according to them their “imams” did taqiyya which was mainly practiced under the oppression of Quraysh.
Ask Twelver Shi’is the following:
1) Were Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA) legitimate Caliphs after the death of Rasool Allah Muhammad ﷺ? (They’ll probably say “No!”)
2) Was Islam triumphant during the tenures of Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA)? (They’ll probably say “No!” yet again.)
3) So was Ali (RAA) the true Caliph from the moment that Rasool Allah ﷺ died? (They’ll probably say “Yes!”)
4) So was Ali (RAA) the true Caliph during the combined 25-year tenure of Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA)? (They’ll probably say “Yes!” yet again.)
5) So if Islam was not triumphant for 25 years during the tenures of Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA), doesn’t that mean that Ali (RAA) also was not the legitimate caliph during those 25 years, since his legitimacy requires Islam to be triumphant during his tenure? (They’ll probably start sweating, and will try to walk back their previous answers, and will now claim that Islam _was_ triumphant during those 25 years.)
6) So if you’re now saying that Islam _was_ triumphant during the 25-year tenure of Abu Bakr (RAA), Umar (RAA), and Uthman (RAA), doesn’t that mean that they were the legitimate Caliphs? (At this point, they will have no clue what to say, since there’s no good way out of this dilemma for their dogmas, other than for them to admit that the original Sunni hadith, does nothing to help prove their so-called “infallible imamah with wilayah taqweeniyyah”.)
If we know that Islam is a perfect religion, what is Sunnah wal Jamaah's plan after the Prophet (pbuh) passes away?
We have Quran & Sunnah of Prophet a.s
Why do I see the comment session watered with Shiai tears?
So you mean to tell me our Prophet (sawa) whi taught is everyrhing frpm salat to how to eat etc. Left out who woild lead the WHOLE UMMA? Seriously, whoever believes that is lost.
Exactly… These Shi’is are absolutely lost.
Well, Syedna Abu Bakr was asked to lead the prayer when Rasoolullah ﷺ was ill. He was his ﷺ companion during Hijra which is also mentioned in the Quran. And verse of the Quran ‘Allah is with us’ includes Syedna Abu Bakr with Rasoolullah ﷺ which elevates his status. May Allah be pleased with him.
@@tahirmahmood9687
is that your proof that Abubakr is the chosen one? 😅
Thank you
Jazak Allah ghair
👊
Wallahi you’re a liar. Can you just encourage your viewers to watch SAN’s videos themselves and come back to comment on your videos? I bet you won’t like their comments after watching SAN😅
But when your so-called “infallible imams” say that taqiyyah is 9/10ths of the Twelver Imamiyyah Shi’a religion, and that he who doesn’t practice taqiyyah is devoid of religion, how can anyone believe anything that any of you say? The only Twelver Imamis today who seem to have set aside their taqiyyah are some of the akhbaris. Unfortunately however, the latter still use _buhtaan_ (slander) against their adversaries as a standard practice, so even they can’t be trusted to tell the truth either.
@@samy7013 😂😂😂 see another liar. When your authentic books are being used to disprove your salafi-wahabeast-umari-sunni religion, you’re here spewing lies and falsehood like farid himself. It’s no news to us that you guys are very closeminded and have little to no knowledge when it comes to Islam. Your arguments have always been based on hearsay and no evidence. Come back again broh!
He (farid) s not even showing everything
Ammar even provided evidence of from sunni Hadith as well
fareed you have to tell where did prophet mention four khurafaa rashiduun
Prove us imamah, go.
Holy moly, this Shia guy talks like a super annoying person
I swear
have you visited speakers' corner and heard people like Mohammad hijab and the other Sunni shouters speak? DETROYING CHRISTIANS, DESTORYING SHIA, DESTOYING JEWS, is the title of all their videos haha and they just shout. Bet you all love mo hijab the professional shouter.
Atleast hijab doesn't have a lisp he's actually masculine
@@kingpiye7060 I see someone’s character never matters to you. Just their lisp. Their looks. Their clothes.
You have a thing for hijab? Think he’s cute or something? I’m confused? Guys a paid activist that yells at everyone.
@@BigAck while I don't much like those titles, I'm yet to see any of their arguments being refuted, in general at least.
Also do you have any proof of hijab being a paid activist? If not and I'm assuming you don't, then what does it say about you (if you call yourself a Muslim)
about the kitab almahassan argument kakashi already proved that the earliest manuscripts include all the imams by name all 12 of them.
Uhh where is this proof?
@@FaridResponds keep deleting my comments farid you coward.
@@-------....___ kakashi of the shariah^
Proof? Evidence?
@@Moody.Smiruai i responded with proof 3 times farid deleted my comment 3 times.
Common Farid...even the Sunnis could not prove who these 12 Amirs are and based on assumption, the Sunni scholars have produced names that are mind-boggling and unbelievable
The hadith says 12 Caliphs. It doesn't mention 12 Imams. There's a huge difference between Caliphs and Imams.
They have Yazid as one of their 12 😂😂😂
@@mustafahassan2975 Islam was strong under Yazid's rule which is what the hadith says.
And Yazid also was an alcoholic who murdered the family of the prophet, the grandson who was called the master of the paradise by the prophet himself!
And yet he is your Imam!!!
@@mustafahassan2975 Yazid did not want to kill Hussain. His army misunderstood his commands.
Sunnis should be on offensive side now. Farid make a video about the shia concept of bada and show how reactionary this sect actually is.
Sunnis have always been oppressors. The fk you mean „Sunnis should be on the offensive side now“ 😂
@@Last2LP yeah Iran in Ahwaz Vu and in Syria Vu
So let me get this straight farid. You had a chance to clarify who the 12 imams are from your sources and you clearly can’t prove it. so you try to deflect and make it seem like the Shia can’t prove it from their books and try bringing them down with you. Pathetic honestly
No matter which school you go to for theology as long as you really believe in some unseen supernatural thing you can’t explain but expect others to believe then you are bias and not open to any intellectual discussion or criticism.
Shia Islam has many logical issues it can’t answer , just have to accept it they claim …😮😮😮
One only needs to read Nawabakhti’s “Book of Shi’a Sects” and read about how the Shi’a fragmented and split into multiple groups after every “imam”, to realize that even the Shi’a had no clue who their “imams” were most of the time! 🤣😂😁
Why you followed the ummayad caliphs or the 4 imams of fiqh. Of course they claimed they are caliphs and Imams, but how did you know they were true caliphs and Imams? How do you know they were not usurpers and fake imams?
Actually the names of the 12 Imams are already mentioned in the earliest shia Hadith collection known as kitab of sulaym.
Alhamdulilah, finally a response to this man Nakshwami, every single night of Ramadan spewing nonsense to his audience. Pls keep up the good work brother Farid.
Shia pagans are coping very hard on this one.
Please make a more detailed video on this one more
Oh my God.this guy farid is really crazy.He wants to judge the shia hadith but he knows nothing about mustahul of shia hadith. He just through words and useless opinions.He ask about imam jawadi to prove his imama ,really? Just go an read the history of imams and you will never ask such question again
Stop embarrassing yourself. Shites are not Muslims
Mustalah*
@@FaridResponds wow Farid you're that petty? spell check miss the point 😂
@@BigAckI think you're missing the point. Shia "Hadith" doesn't hold a candle to the sunni science of Hadith. Not even close. And so much is fabricated. You guys actively do shirk, mins boggles how you will absolutely do anything to uphold it.
Lets face it... Sayed Ammar might not have provided strong evidence on his claims but AT LEAST it holds more truths than the lists of the 12 that Sunni scholars come with. I'm not saying that Ammar showed strong evidence.. that's hard especially when you take into fact that Umar BANNED the writing of hadiths for many years. I'd like to see you analyze and counter the claims of Ammar's Ramadan series WITH your own facts using your literature.
Come on now. That wouldn’t support his narrative
sunnis can’t name the 12 also farid lied the whole video in the latest manuscripts of shia books the 12 imams are mentioned.
@@mustafaal-dabagh9155 Honestly this guy's channel is just to hate on shias and praise umar 💀💀 He doesnt provide anyone with useful information at all.
Are you Shi’is for real? We Sunnis aren’t the ones who consider “infallible imamah and wilayah taqweeniyyah” to be usul of the deen. You’re the ones making these wild claims about your so-called “infallible imams”, so you bring your evidence. It’s the central pillar of _YOUR_ religion, not ours.
@@samy7013 we have our evidence and it can be found in our earliest manuscripts of our books.
The claims that Imams have some “ hidden knowledge “ is nonsense and contradicts reality .
Why do they say that when non of the teachings of any Imams reflects any scientific findings or any scientific knowledge that could have benefited humanity to protect against diseases and knowledge about our planet and solar system and the universe .?
all big claims and no evidence.😮
That makes me so angry 😠.
Just big talks about how great these Imams are and how supernatural power they have .!😮
I will also note that the original version of the hadith at 14:02 also is narrated by Imam Ja'far as Sadiq (6th imam) while in the al-Kafi version it is Muhammad al Jawad (9th imam). The original chain is marfu' in al Mahaasin, so it definitely isn't strong evidence anymore!
imagine picking Ramadan time to enhance and broaden up your shirk...... wow
But it's a directly represents their faith oddly enough. Let's pick on organized praying and label Umar RA a "mushrik" astagfurullah, but he will do videos literally leading his flock astray. The irony is off the charts
My point exactly.
How weak your rebuttals are!
Its not the eyes and ears, but rather the hearts that are blind.
May Allah bring you to the right path of Ahlulbayt
Wow such a profound response 😂
i find them quite strong to be honest, well not very hard to beat these claims i guess for a knowledgeable person, May Allah guide you
Ok then, refute him if theyre weak, mushrik
Lol, these wahabi gang members cannot all together handle an orator syed ammar, syed ammar made these salafi guys forget taraweeh and kept them busy trying hard to refute 😂😂 this came from a man who is not even a debator but just a shia orator, whats gonna happen if an actual shia debator starts making vidoes
Then actual ahle sunnah (all movements in jamaat)debator will start making video's
@@aafanusmani9180 Yeah, we saw that with Shiekh Hassan Allahyari
@@aafanusmani9180 Adnan rashid running by saying he is an akhbari
@@aafanusmani9180 And Asrar Rashid cannot be still found
@@aafanusmani9180 As for the ummah tv umari scholars, they are still busy digging deep in books to find something to refute the videos of shiekh
Can you prove that Abubakar was chosen by Prophet Muhammad PBUH AND ALLAH SWT
Are you Shi’is for real? We Sunnis aren’t the ones who consider “infallible imamah and wilayah taqweeniyyah” to be usul of the deen. You’re the ones making these wild claims about your so-called “infallible imams”, so you bring your evidence. It’s the central pillar of _YOUR_ religion, not ours.
Prove that this is necessary.
We dont believe that Prophet a.s chose an successor.
Isn't Nakshawani the same guy who gave a challenge and when Ustad Adnan Rashid accepted.
He went underground 😂😂😂
its so interesting how sunnis are using sunni hadith to refute sunni hadith
@@rcmysm9123 the pagans of mecca used to pray with their hands on their chests 👀
Using Hadith to criticize a Hadith for scrutiny is a part of Hadith science, something Shias lack much of.
@@rcmysm9123you can't accept the Quran saying hold 5 prayers in their prescribed times. You lot seem to be "travelling" all the time.
Wow buddy. Looks like a Shia might finally understand at least one aspect of Hadith. Congratulations. You're officially better than most of the people compiling and studying Shia hadith.
I wonder why all shia comments sound like bots, not one single coherent comment whatsoever 😂
So Ammar started his series by trying to refute taraweeh in attempts to then try and convince Ahlus sunnah about imamah??
No, the video Farid was watching Ammar said that his focus was to inform Shia more about the imams with Shia Hadith. He wasn’t trying to convince sunnis about imamah.
@@fatninja6847 isn’t his 30 part Ramadan series about proving ithna ashariya but extension refuting ahlus sunnah?
Screaming "Ya Aowli, Ya Aowli,"..asking everything from Ali radhiyallahu anhu.. Eating mud at Najaf.... Slapping with sword and knifes at their own back like Christian... And they not even realize or rather too stupid that even Ali radhiyallahu anhu unable to defend himself from Ibn Muljam..
you have shown from your comments and they are --- due to your sheer perfect ignorance, super scarece little knowledfe & a super mumbi jumbo weak minds and to weak faith and lack of certainty... the religion you follow is from abu bakr & umar (read saqifa incident). read quran 5;67.. which makes it clear about who you should follow after PBUH. Umar ^ abu bakr made 1st sect in islam, the people who stayed with Ali (as) remained in islam. also read tabari sunni book clearly states the propaganda at saqifa and these thug had gone at amximum klength to defend that. lol about Ibn Muljam. Imam Ali knew Ibn Muljam had a sword and he will struck, i finkk mrnergula was born in wahabi famil since u dont know Qadr, eschatology, premonition, & miraj. Imam Ali could ave sliced up all these hypcrites sahabas but the bigger picture was to protect islam and the last words of PBUH to him about patience, actually Fatmia (as) got angry at abu bakr and the GOd's wrath was about to hit abu bakr & umar but Imam ali tried to calm down Fatima (as) during those days after saqifa. Firstly, PBUH and his family are not normal human beings, they were speical creations whom by default know the secret of the universerve. PLus u meed to worry about yourself as how u deny Quran 5;67 and became an abu bakr & umar follower? and you agree , follow and take side of them who were materialistic, corrupted. super hypocrotes (incuded in 12 hypcrites bty abu hudaifah in sunni books), evildoers, dislloyall to the pBUH, misled people, deceivers and upgradedto new islam to islam 1.0 (caliphate islam).
31. From Muhammad son of Wahban from Abi Huraira about the saying of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم):"Whoever wants to live my life and die my death, let him follow Ali son of Abi Taleb and follow the way of the Imams after him, the number of Asbaat(grandsons of Jacob are 12)." The Imams are 12 from the children of Ali (عليه السلام). so their count in total are 13. Sirat AlMustaqeem-AlBayaathi v.2 p.114
You man getting rattled by Ammar. Just because he exposes you and the corrupt companions.
Because of people like you, sectarianism has become a cancer. Farid was respectful and fair in his dealings with you, and then a person like you who has lost many brain cells comes to say something like that
Your infallible "idiot" imams gave baya'a to those "corrupted" companions 😂
Wrong. Farid is intellectually piecing up Ammar.
This guy talks like a clown
Yes,nakjawani is a clown
He just don't talk like a clown
His videos proves that he is a clown
As an added point, Ammar Nakshawani studied Islamic Studies but did not go through formal Hawza training. A lot of those graduates of Hawza training perform Taqiyah, and make a judgement on when it's appropriate to reveal what they were taught about the true history of Islam as taught in the Hawza. Each of the named Imams performed miracles, particularly in front of each major Caliph of their time, so they would have no excuse before Allah SWT when asked why they didn't turn over the caliphate to the Imam, the rightful leader of the Islamic Ummah.
Prove that al-Hadi performed a miracle.
You should really find something better to do with your time
ammar nakshawani should too
@@fluidlessanimations8689 lol here comes a rafidhi mushrik
Your book shelf is about to break. You need something more sturdy
After this video Amat read the yellow shoe Hadith to know what do to next
Leave this subject. Sunn ,Shia that's all you can talk about. Other Shia.sects don't accept 12 imam, they have thier own imams. Abd this 12th one disappeared. 1300 yrs ago. Leave it. Jews love this.
This brudda keeps coming on and embarrassing himself over and over again.
He is obsessed with SAN.
Plus his face is caked in la’na astaghfirullah
@@slothinator5552
Yes, obsessed. His last few videos have ALL been about taking snippets of SAN’s videos and then giving his own opinion rather than a textual discussion.
And the reason Shia scholars are making videos like this is because he is educating our young Shia. He has said it in the videos that he isn’t making it to convert Sunnis. Our Shia have been persecuted for centuries for our beliefs and it’s about time the Shia dropped the inferiority complex completely and know that our beliefs are entrenched in the books of others as well as our own.
Alhamdulillah, just bought Shia Hadiths, we'll see if they are lying 👍 Evidence coming soon.
It’s like listening to a Harry Potter novel
Yes listening to nakjawani is like listening to fairy tale
I agree
Nothing beats abiogenesis as the best fairytale.When is the next addition mate😂?
PhD holding Shia can’t defend his unislmic beliefs is not surprising
Search, find, read and understand the complete Sermon of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh&hf) at Ghadir Khum. Not only the WILAYA (successor) Ameer-ul-Momineen (a.s.) was announced, BUT also the Wilayas (successors) after Ameer-ul-Momineen Imam Ali Ibne Abi Talib (a.s.) the 11 holy Imams names were mentioned.
Indeed Allah (s.w.t.) does not guide the faithless/unbelievers.
Another brainwashed headbeater.
You say search but don't know what to....... Also about Ghadir, He (saw) was expressing support to Ali ra when another sahabi accused him of unjust distribution back in yemen. Even if he would do so why wouldn't he do it back at haj? Also he never said anything about other 11 if so show hadith ( don't just copy anything bring its isnad too).
Also here is a cherry on top against your hate mullahs teach you against Sahabas(AS) :
As for the foremost-the first of the MUHAJIROON and the ANSAR and those who follow them in goodness, Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him. And He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow, to stay there for ever and ever. That is the ultimate triumph
Quran 9:100
Now i ask you same
Search, find & read, read Quran and stop blindly following mullahs and come to Islam.
The names of the 12 Imams (a.s) are even seen inside of the Prophet's (Sawa) mosque in Medina. Go and check it up yourselves.
Yes we know this what does this prove do u know who point them there in the first place your brothers the Qadbrooni Sufi 😂😂😂 what a strawman
Sheikh please if you have an aproch to sheikh Adan Rasheed then please make him ready to respond allayari rafidi in Urdu language!! Jazakumullah khaiir
May Allah bless you!
If I were a sunni, I would look into my own literature as Sayed mentions, look in those references that he gives and be the judge, don’t listen to this guy, judge by your own. In the end it’s you who are responsible for you actions not others.
Stop being ignorant and look into you own books and then judge the behavior of Abu Bakr and Omar generally.
what they did to the house of Fatima(AS) should be enough, there a few incidents that should make it easy for you to see that those two wanted something else from the whole beginning.
As sayed says, how do I expect Sunni Muslim to have anything mentioned in their books when they rejected the first one, it was clearly 2 groups back then, the house of Fatima (AS) and then Abu Bakr and Umar.
As for some that says Ali (AS) gave Bayyah to Abu Bakr, he gave it after Fatima (AS) died according to Sunni literature.
How come that it was an election with Abu Bakr, not with Omar, but with Othman? How can Abu Bakr pass the khilafa to Omar but Omar won’t do the same?
How can we follow people that are capable of doing mistake? Omar changed the some rules in the religion because he thought it was good for the religion, how can he do that? Everything that the prophet (SAW) said should be the same.
Dearest Farid,
I’ve recently been struggling with faith and found some ahadith about the prophet may peace be upon him telling Ali ra that there will be a matter between him and aisha, and he also told his wives that the dogs of al Hawab will be barking at one of them. Can you confirm the authenticity of these ahadith? If proven authentic, then you will have proven that Islam is the ultimate religion of God without a question or doubt.
Making that video would absolutely change my life and thousand of others, please do consider it. If you don’t wish to make a video. Kindly answer me in the comments if you wish.
Assalamu alaikum
Its a prophecy, not a condemnation of any of the person He salallahu alayhi wassalam mentioned
@@fluidlessanimations8689 assalamu alaikum, yes no doubt there. I never said it was a condemnation I just want to know if these prophecies are sahih (authentic) because I don’t see any of the Muslim scholars and debaters talk about it.
Can u give me the matan in arabic i will let u know
@@thoraxg4895 assalamu alaikum, of course
Reported by Qais bn abi Hazim :
أقبلت عائشة مرت ببعض مياه بني عامر طرقتهم ليلا فسمعت نباح الكلاب فقالت أي ماء هذا قالوا ماء الحوأب قالت ما أظنني إلا راجعة قالوا مهلا يرحمك الله تقدمين فيراك المسلمون فيصلح الله بك قالت ما أظنني إلا راجعة إني سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم يقول كيف بإحداكن تنبح عليها كلاب الحوأب
Al Saduq has a report in his book Man La Yahduruhu al Faqih via his isnad:
أن جيش عائشة مروا بماء يقال له ماء الحوأب فنبحتهم كلابه فقالت عائشة ما هذا الماء فقال بعضهم ماء الحوأب فقالت عائشة إنا لله و إنا إليه راجعون ردوني ردوني هذا الماء الذي قال لي رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم لا تكوني التي تنبحك كلاب الحوأب فأتاها القوم بمن شهد و أقسم أن هذا الماء ليس بماء الحوأب
Do you speak Arabic? There are tons of good Arabic videos that you can watch on the topic, that will put your heart at ease. You can also find English language books for free on the web (such as at the Mahajjah Institute-highly recommended!) that discuss this topic clearly and comprehensively, and will resolve all your doubts.
Your line of arguments does not stand. I advise you to read, specially read quran, tafsir and sincerely ask Allah SWT to guide you, rather than making such baseless arguments
🤣🤣🤣
In the terminological sense, the Sahabah (R.A.) refers to those fortunate people who were blessed with the sight of the Messenger of God (PBUH) in the state of faith and became dear to Allah in the state of faith....
According to hadiths, whoever recites the word la ilaha illallah Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah is a Muslim.
Is everyone who has seen Einstein a professor of physics today?
If not, then how can anyone who has seen the Messenger of Allah become a religious scholar?
Below we will see the types of Companions of the Holy Prophet from the Holy Quran
The Holy Qur'an has divided the Companions of the Messenger into different categories, and it does not matter whether a person is a Badri or a non-Badri, believed before Hudaybiyyah or after Hudaybiyyah, before the conquest of Makkah came among the Muslims or the conquest. After Mecca. Therefore, the real faces of these groups have been mentioned in the Holy Quran as follows:
1. The famous hypocrites (Surah Al-Munafiqun, verse 1).
2. A deceiver and a cunning hypocrite (Surah Towbah, verse 101).
3. Patients with hearts (Surah Ahzab, verse 12).
4. Those who listen to the words of the enemies who spread fitnah (Surah Towbah, verse 45-47).
5. Those who do good and bad deeds (Surat al-Tawbah, verse 102).
6. Apostates (Surah Al-Imran, verse 154).
7. Except for the believers, those who have been accepted (Surah Hujarat, verse 14).
8. Mawulfah al-Qulub (Surah Towbah, verse 60).
9. Fasiq (Surah Hujarat, verse 6).
10. At the time of war, those who turn their backs on the disbelievers and run away (Surah Anfal, verse 15, 16).
Where the Holy Qur'an has promised paradise for following the Companions of the Prophet, the same Qur'an has forbidden following the hypocrites.
Surah Towa 100. And among the emigrants and the Ansar, those who excelled first, and those who followed them in good conduct, Allah was pleased with them, and they were pleased with Allah, and Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which rivers flow. They will flow in them forever and this is the great achievement.
Surah Ahzab
1. O Prophet, fear Allah and do not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites. Indeed, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.
Note: ___
When the hypocrites come to you, they say: We bear witness that you are indeed the Messenger of Allah, and Allah knows that you are indeed His Messenger, and Allah bears witness that these hypocrites are indeed liars. )
If there were hypocrites among the Companions of the Prophet, there were some who came to him and testified that he was the Prophet of God.
God has forbidden to obey the hypocrites, then how can the consensus of the Companions of the Prophet be a proof?
[Surah Maida verse 10:10. And those who disbelieved and denied Our revelations are the people of Hell.]_________________
1. Surah Al-Imran: 144.
Result____:@
"It is wrong to call the Sahaba RA wrong and it is also wrong to call the wrong Sahaba" __@
Only those who disbelieve dispute in the Ayat of Allah, so let them be troubled by their confusion in the land. (4)
Translation: Kanzalaiman
They do not dispute in the verses of Allah, but the disbelievers, so do not be deceived by their wandering in the cities, O listener.
"Read carefully again"
The Sunni sect is over❤
Farid - would you not say the same happens in our literature of hadith. An earlier report is shorter but a later report gives more details. But we accept both.
It's the same sanad and the same narration with a different matn. It shows that stuff was tampered with. If you read our literature there is a difference in isnad usually regarding the same report
Why would the earlier report not mention the 12 imams? What reason would they have for Shias to remove the 12 imams?
@@Spined1234 Because Al Kulayni needed to fabricate evidence to support his theological beliefs, so he took the same sanad and just added the rest of the names and graded it sahih.
Why do the Ismailis and Zaydis have a different list of Imams if it is all so obvious?
@@Mehmet_Fateh We as Sunnis believe that their 4th imam Ali ibn Hussayn r.a was asked about Abu bakr r.a and Umar r.a and he defended them so a group of the Shia declared someone else the imam
LOL Nice try. - Amar Nakswani FAILS. Are you joking? This proof is in Sunni books. How can he fail.
Strange first they do away with eldest son Hasan's progeny from Imamat and start it from the mixed blood of Yazd Gerd, then almost all so called Imams had issues with their brothers over Imamat like Baqir. Even they weren't sure 😃
Phd given by whom.. christian pastors, i guess! Hahaa😤
Ohhhh ahahhahahahhqhqhhqhahqhqhhqhqhqhqhqhhw that was so funny omg you must be a comedian
@@HR-313but he has a point PhD of western uni doesn't equate to classical Islamic studies. Completely different, that's why he avoids actual debates with learned.
@TheFaro2011 does Mohammad Hijab have his phd from al.azhar? Lol
God Bless you Farid.
This article destroy Sunnite/suffite islam
In the terminological sense, the Sahabah (R.A.) refers to those fortunate people who were blessed with the sight of the Messenger of God (PBUH) in the state of faith and became dear to Allah in the state of faith....
According to hadiths, whoever recites the word la ilaha illallah Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah is a Muslim.
Is everyone who has seen Einstein a professor of physics today?
If not, then how can anyone who has seen the Messenger of Allah become a religious scholar?
Below we will see the types of Companions of the Holy Prophet from the Holy Quran
The Holy Qur'an has divided the Companions of the Messenger into different categories, and it does not matter whether a person is a Badri or a non-Badri, believed before Hudaybiyyah or after Hudaybiyyah, before the conquest of Makkah came among the Muslims or the conquest. After Mecca. Therefore, the real faces of these groups have been mentioned in the Holy Quran as follows:
1. The famous hypocrites (Surah Al-Munafiqun, verse 1).
2. A deceiver and a cunning hypocrite (Surah Towbah, verse 101).
3. Patients with hearts (Surah Ahzab, verse 12).
4. Those who listen to the words of the enemies who spread fitnah (Surah Towbah, verse 45-47).
5. Those who do good and bad deeds (Surat al-Tawbah, verse 102).
6. Apostates (Surah Al-Imran, verse 154).
7. Except for the believers, those who have been accepted (Surah Hujarat, verse 14).
8. Mawulfah al-Qulub (Surah Towbah, verse 60).
9. Fasiq (Surah Hujarat, verse 6).
10. At the time of war, those who turn their backs on the disbelievers and run away (Surah Anfal, verse 15, 16).
Where the Holy Qur'an has promised paradise for following the Companions of the Prophet, the same Qur'an has forbidden following the hypocrites.
Surah Towa 100. And among the emigrants and the Ansar, those who excelled first, and those who followed them in good conduct, Allah was pleased with them, and they were pleased with Allah, and Allah has prepared for them gardens beneath which rivers flow. They will flow in them forever and this is the great achievement.
Surah Ahzab
1. O Prophet, fear Allah and do not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites. Indeed, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.
Note: ___
When the hypocrites come to you, they say: We bear witness that you are indeed the Messenger of Allah, and Allah knows that you are indeed His Messenger, and Allah bears witness that these hypocrites are indeed liars. )
If there were hypocrites among the Companions of the Prophet, there were some who came to him and testified that he was the Prophet of God.
God has forbidden to obey the hypocrites, then how can the consensus of the Companions of the Prophet be a proof?
[Surah Maida verse 10:10. And those who disbelieved and denied Our revelations are the people of Hell.]_________________
1. Surah Al-Imran: 144.
Result____:@
"It is wrong to call the Sahaba RA wrong and it is also wrong to call the wrong Sahaba" __@
Only those who disbelieve dispute in the Ayat of Allah, so let them be troubled by their confusion in the land. (4)
Translation: Kanzalaiman
They do not dispute in the verses of Allah, but the disbelievers, so do not be deceived by their wandering in the cities, O listener.
"Read carefully again"
The Sunni sect is over
Concocted . Circular reasoning. Begging the question. Ali (rta) in the presence of Abu Bakr (rta) and umar(rta).
So he invokes Khidr, why not just a random person. Confabulations!
Farid videos are educational and hilarious simultaneously....
From Muhammad son of Wahban from Abi Huraira about the saying of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم):"Whoever wants to live my life and die my death, let him follow Ali son of Abi Taleb and follow the way of the Imams after him, the number of Asbaat(grandsons of Jacob are 12)." The Imams are 12 from the children of Ali (عليه السلام). so their count in total are 13. Sirat AlMustaqeem-AlBayaathi v.2 p.114
So why do Zaydis and Ismailis exist?
@Mehmet_Fateh You should probably those sect members.
@@harunkelly4530 Who did Jafar al-Sadiq name as his successor?
@@Mehmet_Fateh He's son Musa al Kazim a.s.
@@harunkelly4530 I mean originally...
😂 phd. If ammar is phd then I can fly.
PhD in England. More than you or I have achieved
If you fly, I hope that it’s on an elephant. 🐘
The Shi’is in the crowd will know what I’m talking about! 🤣😂😁
This “evidence” is what they teeter their entire akhira on? I’d laugh if it wasn’t so sad.
Ya Farid ...وَمَثَلُ الَّذِيۡنَ کَفَرُوۡا كَمَثَلِ الَّذِىۡ يَنۡعِقُ بِمَا لَا يَسۡمَعُ اِلَّا دُعَآءً وَّنِدَآءً ؕ صُمٌّۢ بُكۡمٌ عُمۡـىٌ فَهُمۡ لَا يَعۡقِلُوۡنَ
It is not proved that al-Kulayni is just filling in names; al-Barqi seems to imply his list is not exhaustive. So perhaps al-Kulayni is simply giving the full account accurately. But this doesn't prove he is in fact relaying a genuine account, either.
It's still tampering with the hadith. And it makes no sense why the Shia muhadetheen would randomly remove the names of the 12 imams of highly important hadith.
@@Spined1234
No, it doesn't have to be tampering. What was written was implied to not be exhaustive: it is not random removal. Oftentimes people don't reference all the hadith they know or don't list the isnad if they already have it somewhere, etc.
Hadith have an oral life, not just a written one, so a fuller hadith later written down doesn't mean an earlier, truncated hadith that was written was then tampered with by the later source, especially if the earlier one explicitly says the tradition they are relating is truncated and incomplete.
Once again, this isn't to say it is authentic. But it doesn't prove inauthenticity
@@1001011011010 It makes absolutely no sense why the Shia would randomly remove the names of the 12 imams in a highly important hadith considering that Imamah is one of, if not the most important tenet in their faith.
The only explanation that makes sense is that this hadith originally did not mention the 12 imams and later Shiee authors came along and inserted their own list into it.
This is strong evidence that the hadith was tampered by the Shia, which is common with a lot of their hadiths.
@@Spined1234
It wasn't randomly removed, listen to the hadith again. It just doesn't list them all out; the list of people is not listed out itemized, but it is described.
@@1001011011010 Again, why would the Shia NOT list the names of the 12 imams when that is the most single important aspect of this hadith? So the shiee muhadith receives this amazing hadith listing all the 12 imams and then just decides to exclude all of them for some reason.
Yeah sorry I'm having a lot of trouble buying this story especially when the Shia often use this hadith as evidence for their imamah. I need a better explanation as to why the earlier Shia hadith did not mention the names of the 12 imams. This isn't even mentioning the issue that the Imams themselves did not use this hadith as proof of their Imamah.
Is it just me or are (some) Twelver 'hadiths' just cut, edited, and pasted with a Shi'a flavor to suit their needs?
Anyone who knows anything about ahadeeth knows that the Shi'a 'hadith' quoted sounds awfully a lot like when Jibra'eel (AS) visited Rasul ﷺ and asked him questions about the Deen in the presence of the Sahaba (RA).
No doubt.
Elephant Airways 😂
If the imams can communicate with angels, what exactly is the difference between them and prophets from a shi'i viewpoint?
No difference, except the name. Shi’is actually believe that their “infallible imams” are superior to all of the Prophets, except Muhammad ﷺ, and even the latter deference to Rasool Allah ﷺ is just lip-service. They ascribe alleged virtues to their “infallible imams” far higher than what they ascribe to Rasool Allah Muhammad ﷺ.
Salam, Can you make a video on 33:33 and that um salama hadith and wether this ayah speaks including the wives or not? Ive seen sunni interpretations saying both. Or point me to a video that does. Jazakallah khair, i appreciate all the work you do