0:23 first question: Why do you still have weak ahadith in your classical works, why aren't they removed? 3:26 second question: Why do you Muslims authenticate ahadith that you like, and reject ahadith which you dislike? 💀 I've heard this a lot 😭 5:07 3rd question or claim. Authors of hadith works are the ones who fabricated ahadith and ahadith are 200 years old or even older. I've heard this one a lot too, mostly by Qur'an only people. As-salamu aleykum and may Allah bless you brother Farid
Reason we still have weak ( or even blasphemous) Hadith in our kutub because in Hadith science or discipline a weak hadees is still useful (5%) for fatwa or in fiq...
1:05 sorry' brother but you're wrong.. nobody would have notices or thought about those controversies if we don't have it on our books.. and for islamaphob they don't care weak dhaif etc for them they have different uslool criteria..it called criteria of embarrassment..
Could you turn this into a series “common claims about…” For the second episode you could talk about common claims about the Quran. BarakAllahu Feekum.
Hadith system is just like version control system in software development field. Old mistakes and changes are never removed so we can trace them all the way back to the originals and know where and why changes were made.
nah actually even a fabricated hadith is stronger than the bible because we know why it is fabricated and which person in the chain has problems. In the case of the bible, it was written by anonymous authors.
@@thecrow6388 💀💀bruh trust me you're the one that needs to speak to his teacher. Daif is classified weak for a reason, it's unreliable. Daif are not usable to derive any juridical ruling or practice although scholars can use the stories when it comes to teaching good values. That's all there is to it. If I'm wrong, please name me one single daif hadith that scholars used in order to argue about something serious. I'll wait.
@@abdelhalimtarek bro come on you gotta be joking Farid is very learnt in hadith, you can't argue that, he's giving a valid scholarly perspective 2) I think you're just making up reasons not to like him cuz making videos while driving is normal + it doesn't affect the quality + some people are busier than you think so they multi-task
The more that I learn about the Hadith Sciences, the stronger my imaan becomes. When I was younger-may Allah forgive me-I leaned towards the arguments of the Sunnah deniers, but that stopped as soon as I started learning about the magnificent work that the scholars of Hadith have done to preserve our religion free from interpolation and corruption. The preservation of the Sunnah is one of the subjects these makes me so proud to be a Muslim, and I advise you to start learning about it. A good place to start is to read the books of Dr. Mustafa al-A’zami. He wrote books about the preservation of both the Sunnah and also about the preservation of the Noble Qur’an. They’re a must-read. So having said that, I affirm that every authentic hadith-whether mutawaatir or ahaad-is just as binding upon every Muslim as any verse of the Noble Qur’an. The Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah are both revelation, and are inseparable parts of Islam. Do NOT deceive yourself into thinking that Islam without the Sunnah is Islam at all. Sunnah denial is apostasy, so learn the Sunnah.
Why keep weak Hadith? First of all the weak Hadith have no effect in core belief 'Aqida', No weak hadith will say God has a son or God is Human etc.. Sometimes a hadith is weakened due to having little information about a narrator integrity or his birth place, dwelling place or mental health. thus its kept until further investigation is done !!!! Depending on very "strict conditions" as having other Sahih hadith from other ways (chains) they may be referenced or glanced upon but they serve no more than that. So my answer is: Out of fear of losing even a tiny bit of revelation Why then keep fabrications & claims? Because lies & fabrications are recycled, it helps knowing their origin & the kind of people whom spread them 😎 YES !!! we Even have narration chains of fabrication while other religions fail to provide a chain for their cannon books 😁
Jazakallahkheir. But i got a question. What do you think of the Sahifa of Hamam bin Munabih as the earliest wriiten record of hadith. Do you think its authentic?
Assalaamu alaykum brother, I was thinking if you can make a video explaining the science of Hadiths in authenticating the narrations of the prophet Muhammad peace be upon him while comparing it to how it is different from how the first Christians scholars collected the manuscripts and decided to introduced them into their bible… , I guess you got my point. (And prepare for the clash) The reason I said that is because I think a lot of Christians don’t understand what we are talking about when we talk about the authenticity of the Hadiths, so I guess an explanation of the science of Hadiths while bringing examples and comparing them to how biblical texts got into the Bible will be helpful to make them understand the concept, and Allah knows best.
About the second question, ive heard some christians use this hadith to prove that we authenticate ahadith based on whether we like it or not: Abu Humayd reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “If you hear a narration from me that your hearts recognize, settles your hair and skin, and you see it as close to you, then I am most deserving of it. If you hear a narration from me that your hearts reject, makes your hair stand and your skin crawl, and you see it as far from you, then I am the furthest from it.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 15725 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Arna’ut How should we respond to this?
Simple, "did you know prophet Muhammad SAW? What his teaching. What he done. What he experienced. To win this participation trophy, you need to learn for the people of religion. Not some wacky ass David Wood, CPrincess, Hantun, Sam Shamoun, Nabeel Quraisy (which never a Muslim)
this is the understanding of the hadith Your hearts recognize,” meaning: the heart accepts it, and it does not cause disturbance to the soul. This is either by presenting it to the known principles of religion, so if it does not contradict it, the heart accepts it, or by knowing the men of the chain of transmission, for if they are trustworthy and proven, the heart will rush to accept it, and it is possible that this hadith is Such as: “Consult your heart. Righteousness is what the soul is at ease with and the heart is at ease with, and sin is what troubles the soul and hesitates in the chest, even if the people tries to convince you that it's good.” A hasan hadith, narrated by Ahmad [4/228] and Al-Darimi [2/246] and others, as in Al-Arba’in by Al-Nawawi, may God Almighty have mercy on him. This is to be interpreted as referring to the suspected command, otherwise what is commanded in the Sharia without opposition is righteousness, and whatever is proven to be prohibited is sin, and what is meant is that the heart of the believer looks with the light of God if he has strong faith... This requires that It is necessary to refer to the known and proven principles of the religion in what is doubtful in the hadith, and God Almighty knows best
TBF you sometimes see Muslims doing #2. Like I sometimes see people going "weak/fabricated hadith!" about the hadiths referring to A'isha's age... in Sahih al-Bukhari
I think another reason to the first question is "Documentation"... in any scholarly studies it helps to document... if one finds the same report in the future at least there is a documentation of it to help further research or study...
Peace Farid, In your book, The Necessity of Hadith, on pages 45-46 you wrote: FARID: “Quranist conflate the word hadith meaning statement in the verse, with the “prophetic hadith” that we are all used to today.” The operative term in your statement, of course, is ‘hadith.’ Your position, along with that of Sunni Islam paradigm, attempts to, advertently or inadvertently, undermine the nature of a rhetorical question in general, and the rhetorical question 45:6 in specific. This approach is not rational/logical. The nature of a rhetorical question is to make a point, not to seek a literal answer. In fact, by its nature, a rhetorical question is incapable of expecting a literal answer; seeking one would defeat its purpose. Surah 45:6 poses a rhetorical question, whose intent is not to seek information as a standard question does, but to affirm the book/Quran’s authority, completeness, and sufficiency to guide. It simultaneously negates the notion that following sources other than the Book/the Quran for guidance is unacceptable to Allah. Thus, suggesting that ‘some hadith’ are acceptable to Allah contradicts the rhetorical nature of 45:6, not to mention other clear verses which state the Book/the Quran is fully detailed and sufficient to guide. Again, a rhetorical question, by its nature, cannot be treated as if it’s seeking a literal answer. A rhetorical question cannot simultaneously be rhetorical and not rhetorical. Likewise, sufficient cannot mean sufficient and simultaneously mean not sufficient. Thus, 45:6 precludes any extra-Quranic hadith from being used as guidance in Deen Al-Islam. 45:6 These are the communications/ayats of Allah which We recite to you with the truth; then in what announcement/hadith would they believe after Allah and His communications/ayats? 45:6, then, is a blanket command by Allah that NO hadith is acceptable to Him relative to guidance, except, His hadith the Book/the Quran: 39:23: 39:23 Allah has revealed the best announcement/hadith, a book conformable in its various parts, repeating, whereat do shudder the skins of those who fear their Lord, then their skins and their hearts become pliant to the remembrance of Allah; this is Allah's guidance, He GUIDES WITH IT whom He pleases; and (as for) him whom Allah makes err, there is no guide for him. 45:6 and 39:23, among other verses, establishes that the Book/The Quran is fully detailed and sufficient for guidance, and simultaneously rejects hadith, “prophetic” or otherwise for guidance. ARGUMENT FOR THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE BOOK/THE QURAN P1. If Allah is the Truth, and the Truth is from Allah, and Allah speaks the Truth, and none is truer in word than Allah, then all claims made by Allah are necessarily true claims. P2. If Allah’s claims are necessarily true claims, then Allah’s claims cannot contradict each other. P3. If Allah claims something to be sufficient for a particular purpose, then He cannot simultaneously claim that same thing is not sufficient for that particular purpose. P4. If Allah claims that Hell is sufficient to burn, He is sufficient to guide, and the Book/The Quran is sufficient to guide, then these are necessarily true claims. Therefore: C1. Allah’s claim that He is sufficient to guide and that Book/The Quran is sufficient to guide are necessarily true claims. Therefore: C2. Allah’s claim the Book/the Quran is fully detailed is necessarily a true claim. Therefore: C3. The claim that the sunnah/hadith books are to be followed along with the Book/the Quran for guidance is necessarily a false claim. Therefore: C4. The claim that “obey the Messenger” means the sunnah/hadith books are to be followed along with the Book/the Quran for guidance is necessarily a false claim. Therefore: C5. The claim that solaa is a ritual prayer is necessarily a false claim. Therefore: C6. The claim that “the Quran only” position is false, is necessarily a false claim. ***(See below)*** PROOF TEXT: P1: 31:30; 4:170; 33:4; 10:82; 4:122; 4:82 P2. 4:82 P3. 4:82 P4. 4:55; 25:31; 29:51 Therefore: C1. 6:114; 41:3 C2. 6:114; 41:3 C3. 45:6; 6:114; 41:3 C4. 25:31; 45:6; 6:114; 41:3 C5. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3 C6. All the above ***P1. If the Messenger received wahy apart from the Quran, then the “Quran only” position is false. P2.The Messenger received wahy apart from the Quran. C1. Therefore: the Quran only” position is false. C2. Therefore: the position that the sunnah and hadith books cannot be followed as guidance along with the Book/the Quran, is false.*** C2. Is my addition to the argument; it was not apart of the original syllogism written by Jake. Looking forward to your reply! Tariq-
If you have truly studied the fundamentals of Ahadith, you would know that a hadith is classified as either true or false-there's no in-between. When we refer to a hadith as 'weak,' it doesn't imply the content is weak; rather, it indicates a flaw in the chain of narration. In other words, a 'weak hadith' classification doesn't render the hadith itself false/fabricated; it's the integrity of the narrators in the chain that is questionable. So, if a hadith compiler points out a weakness in the character of one or more individuals among the 6-10 in the chain, it doesn't automatically invalidate the entire hadith. Moreover, what may be considered weak by one compiler, such as Imam Bukhari, could be deemed authentic by another, like Imam Abu Hanifa. It's crucial to note that not all hadiths were compiled simultaneously; many compilers lived centuries apart. Therefore, a chain of narration that appears weak to one scholar might be accepted as authentic by another, especially if the first few individuals in the chain are found to be reliable. Unless two hadiths convey conflicting messages, it is encouraged to follow them. In case of a contradiction, efforts should be made to reconcile the teachings of both hadiths. If reconciliation is impossible, the more authentic narration takes precedence. That's where the classifications come into play, and there is an entire field study that employs a comprehensive methodology to navigate these complexities. Those who outright reject a hadith due to its 'weak' classification are essentially hadith rejectors, period!
"In other words, a 'weak hadith' classification doesn't render the hadith itself false/fabricated; it's the integrity of the narrators in the chain that is questionable. So, if a hadith compiler points out a weakness in the character of one or more individuals among the 6-10 in the chain, it doesn't automatically invalidate the entire hadith. " you lost me there
If in a chain you have a weak narrator, then his statement of it being conveyed by someone above him in the chain who's reliable will still render the Hadith weak because we're still relying on the weak narrator's statement of it coming from a reliable person. Imo, you're attempting to validate the weak ahadith found in Hanafi madhab but unfortunately for you, scholars from the salaf have criticised Imam Abu hanifa ra in matters of hadith while acknowledging the greatness of his fiqh.
@@spawnnpwn4166the mistakes of abu hanifa were fixed by his students. And no he was not weak in hadith this is just a popular criticism by the psudosalfis
Hadiths are not the real source of religion. We can only see them as a rumor or maybe historical sources of this religion but not as a word of God or as a word of his messenger. Allah never told us in the Quran that "Go and follow rumors or hadiths after Mohammed is dead. He said Quran is enough and he elobareted Quran so no one will need a second explanation for the religion." God says in the Quran that follow the messenger. If he is dead follow Quran only and correct yourself with Quran. Quran is enough and you will be questioned from Quran in the day of judgment. You just love so much your ancestor's false teachings more than God's teachings in Quran that makes the religion into a corrupted and complex religion. Leave your ancestors false traditions and follow only Quran to fix yourself. Quran says you can read Torah, Bible to understand teachings of God but not hadiths. We muslims shouldn't do that to understand what God wants from us. (I know Quran has transcribed after the messenger is dead so don't tell me Quran is also hadith and yes Quran is also a hadith tells you to leave other so called hadiths except Quran) May peace and God be with us.
You just actually lied about the Qur'an, Allah says in the Qur'an 'If he was killed or died, would you turn back on your heels?', meaning even if the Messenger ﷺ was to be killed or died even at the time when he lived & this goes for those after, one must still follow him. Allah never says FOLLOW ONLY QUR'AN IF THE MESSENGER DIES. This is a lie about Allah and about Qur'an. Problem is that people like you: 1. Can't even read the Qur'an 2. Make up lies to suit your desires 3. Lie about the Qur'an 4. Even after being shown proof, you still turn away even from what the Qur'an says. So don't play around with the Qur'an as there are plenty of us who understand it, learn it, teach it and can refute you on every single claim. Cut the nonsense and return back to Allah and follow his Messenger as you're commanded to. If not then spare people of your evil as it won't work.
@@assassinwithalqalam Look, you have a point that I didn't tell that part was my interpretation; "If he is dead follow Quran only and correct yourself with Quran." but you didn't understand what God wanted from us, that's for sure, he didn't want us to follow our ancestors after his messenger death, he wanted us to follow Quran or (what it remained) after his death. If a messenger dies (which is also happened), Allah ofc would want us to follow his words and teachings in our memory. I'm just saying these words are transcribed after his death but not the rumors of the prophet. That means Quran can be the only source of the religion. If hadiths also would be necessary for these teachings, they would also include these rumors to Quran but they didn't. If you think I'm lying, answer me, why hadiths werent part of the Quran? Because they knew that it wasn't important during that period. Quran was enough for them. May Allah give you peace and freedom to leave extremism.
@@user-co8uf1mj6c Who told you that hadiths are the words of prophet? People who followed these words for centuries of course. It implies the same for Quran. I didn't say rumors are totally fake, I said that rumors can be historical evidence for the religion but not the religion itself. You don't get my point here. May Allah help you to get.
Assalamu alaikum brother Would suggest to add a background to the text you add in the thumbnail and write the most important thing in bold I can create simple thumbnails for you for free, just want to help
Farid no one has answered me this question I hope you will. Why when we have some many books of primary Hadith apart from the 9 known ones no one has been able to authenticate the sahih from daef and translate them and make the available freely online like the 9 known books are. This is Soo unfair for the ummah
Question no 3... this cannot be a blanket accusation... it has to be per report basis... I think anyone can see that. And collected does not mean created... if I collect and publish a book on Aesop fables that has bird stories in them today, I am not creating those fables only today... again, I think anyone can see that.
I do follow most Hadith i just understand that is may or may not be true. Too many contradict the Quran. I did not leave Christianity to follow Bukari. I left for monotheism
Authentic hadiths do not contradict the Quran It is the scholars who determine the evaluation of the hadith, not the general public You don't tell the doctor what he should do in his specialty
@@الحقيقةالمغيبة-خ9خ actually I have told doctors exactly what to do and that's exactly what I needed and they agreed with me. I am legitimately alive because of it. The thing is I'm inside my own body and the doctor is not so I know what I'm going through uniquely based off of what I'm feeling or they may not because my linguistic skills may not be able to express the points that I'm feeling in the dialect that has been given to me. But we're not talking about that My question for both of you. There are four schools of accepted thought amongst scholars just on variations on prayer alone. With your "souls" on the line do you know exactly how Prophet Muhammad(saw) prayed? For me I only know those four schools and how they prayed I do not know exactly how our beloved prophet prayed EXACTLY. I follow a large majority of Hadith even though some I find to be quite suspect. However I do not overburden myself with a part of the religion that I do not find concrete. To even associate the Hadith alongside the Quran as divine I find blasphemous. I can associate the Hadith to be more reliable than the Bible. More reliable than written history. But there is no second or third place next to the Quran. Literally nothing.
Why is the concept of a "weak" hadith being discussed as though it is a FALSE or FABRICATED hadith? A hadith being "weak" is mainly because of its sanad and its classification is also based on an opinion/criticism of an individual. It does not mean that the content of the hadith itself is necessarily NOT TRUE. Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
@@FaridResponds Farid respond to Race Car (RC) on a point every Tafsir explains! Such a worthy response to spend your time on! well.. Maybe (I'm being sarcastic)
Islam = Qur’an and Sunnah. We have never followed Hadith Books directly. We follow Fiqh Books written by specialists who extract the Sunnah from the Hadith Books.
How can compiler fabricate it as much as i know Ali ibn Talib ,and Abdullah ibn e Musud always wrote what Prophet said.Apart from that if this case of fabrication of hadith by Bukhari than why m aware of this fact that even his father had works much in compiling hadiths.
1. Why do you still have weak narrations in your books? (why not change your books like we have changed our books?) 2. You authenticate what you like and inauthenticate what you don't like. (you have already changed your books like we have changed ours) 3. The authors of Hadith fabricated Hadith because Hadith books are 200 years after the Prophet PBUH. (Why dont' you have the same problem that we have) The last one is pointless because of the rigorously authenticated multiple chains of narrations. It is impossible to fabricate such a network of human beings across space and time.
i have a question akhi: how are we sure the books on ilm al rijal are narrated accurately till our time? I guess they have sanad too? But how do you check their sanad?
My advice would be for you to study usul al-hadith. Then your questions will be answered satisfactorily. There are things you are assuming about ilm al-rijal due to a lack of knowledge.
@@FaridRespondshe uses historical critical method on Islamic history and sources. Some of his conclusions are different from our tradional narratives. I am interested in what you have to say of him.
Your first argument does not make much sense. For the average layman navigating hadith literature is difficult, it definitely is a specialised field which is why scholars spend a life time studying them. The quranic ayats have a context to them we generally know when they were revealed what was going on and what problem was being addressed, but for some hadith this context is missing which can lead to a diverse range of opinions, which extreme groups in our history like ISIS will exploit, especially around rights of minorities, apostacy, blasphemy, punishments etc Also I have always wondered why our prophet pbuh or his close companions upon his death never institutionalised the preservation and authenticity of his sayings whilst avoiding them being conflated with quranic ayats, this would have been a logical thing to do rather than wait some 200 years later for it to happen, which is what happened to the christian NT, and we have the results of that before us ! When Islamaphobes come after us it is usually with weaker hadith or more authentic ones without their historical context, either way it becomes easy for them to debunk Islam when they go after hadith literature and then we have to spend a very long time addressing this.
Well, if youre a layman you probably shouldnt be getting into books like the works of at-Tabari. We have plenty of hadith books that only have authentic ahadith, but, if an authour wants to show weaker hadith anyway, we should respect that. People who attack islam literally use whatever they can, they dont just take hadith out of context. They take many quran verses out of context too.
You already admitted that you're a layman so don't talk about it. Secondly, who says 200 years passed? And who says the sahabah radiya Allahu anhum didn't write ahadeeth down? This is the problem with people who reject ahadeeth.
100 years passed when hadith books started getting published. Secondly while the main messege of Quran is self explanatory, many of its verses have context which we precisely know from hadiths. The preservation was not a concern during the time of sahabah. However Quran needs to be absolutely exact in correct order and you get rewad by reciting it as opposed to hadiths. So the situation is not the same. Whereas publishing hadith books would have make many people give their focus only or mainly in hadiths as opposed to Quran which is not right.
@@user-co8uf1mj6cbad advice. A man is asking a question and you're asking him to look it up in sources that may or may not be written by Muslims. Give him the answer, a book, or a reference or just keep going.
@@sfgdragoon when Rasoolu Allah ﷺ and Abu Bakr رضي الله عنه were hiding, not sure if you know the story? You can find it online in sha'a Allah for more context
@@assassinwithalqalam i dont knoe. But i assume this is some sort of story which circulates among the Desi or subcontinent then. Leave me to my assumptions ma fi mushkilah
@@sfgdragoon no it's also in the Qur'an and hadith but there are some details mentioned in other ahadeeth that are known because the stories are in the seerah books. Only thing is, those ahadeeth are weak and are circulated as authentic usually by people
*Bible vs Bible* @ Matthew 17:21 KJB : 'Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.' NIV : [Doesn't exist!!!] @ Matthew 18:11 KJB : For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost. NIV: [Doesn't exist] @ Mark 9:44 + Mark 9:46 NIV : where THEIR WORM DOES NOT DIE, AND THE FIRE IS NOT QUENCHED. ESV : [Doesn't exist!!!] @ Mark 11:26 NIV: [Doesn't exist!!] KJB : But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses. @ Mark 15:28 KJB : And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors. NIV: [Doesn't exist!] @ Mark 16:9-20 [Forgery]
why don't you deal with better arguments or even better invite someone with opposing views and have a respectful dialogue? refusing to do so makes you look deceptive and scared.
Why don't make a new book named "Saheeh Bukhari Authenticated version" or whatever...? Rather, u can't do that since muhadiths have different criteria of authenticating hadiths, so they aren't even agreeing on what is daif and what is not. Bukhari considers some hadiths in Sahih Muslim as daif and Muslim considers some hadiths to be daif in Sahih Bukhari for example. Why do u still pretend like it is clear what is authentic hadith and what is daif? Even daif hadith can be true, it is just not taken in sharia ruling due to seriousness of the matter, but like sheik Usaymin said, we can take weak hadiths for ibadah. So basically if some muhadiths classify hadirh as daif, it doesn't mean it is not true. And if some muhadiths classify hadith as saheeh, it doesn't mean it is true, since there can be other muhadiths who will consider that hadith as daif or even forged.. As for hadiths that are agreed upon to be sahih, it is still work of people and has contradictions. I am not saying this to follow Qur'an only, but we should follow hadiths too. If they happen to not be true, we are not to blame since the people who brought them to us are not knows as liars, rather as trustworthy, knowledgeable, pious people. We are not obligated to follow those that doesn't make sense or contradict each other. If someone doubts Islam due to some hadiths, do not reject Islam, reject those hadiths, since hadiths are not revelation, neither it is authenticated by God, rather by people who disagree with eachother upon its authenticity.
Islam = Qur’an and Sunnah. We have never followed Hadith Books directly. We follow Fiqh Books written by specialists who extract the Sunnah from the Hadith Books.
@@mikhan5191 that is even worse! If you followed sunnah according to ur understanding of hadiths, at least you will have your opinion. But you are actually saying that you follow other humans like you, and their opinion on hadiths...instead of using ur own brain. Don't be lazy and give your brain to others. Form ur opinion, do not blindly follow brother.
@@ahmedahmud5281 - what you are implying is DO NOT BLINDLY FOLLOW SAHABA!!! That is kufr because you have rejected what our Prophet salallahu alayhiwasallam said and what the Qur'an says.
@@mikhan5191 which sahaba? The ones that says to pray with raising your hands at the start of salah only, or the ones who say to raise hands more time during prayer? We are talking about not following some hadiths, not about not following sahabah. The only way we can follow sunnah is through sahabah. Kufr is only if u reject to follow Prophet s.a.w.s. As for sahabah, noone can follow them like following of Prophet s.a.w.s, since they disagreed what is sunnah and what is not, but whichever opinion of sahaba u take, in sha Allah u are following sunnah of Prophet s.a.w.s.
@@ahmedahmud5281 - so now you agree with us that we can Blind Follow the Sahaba! You previously stated "DON'T BLINDLY FOLLOW". Now you have changed your tune! Your next question is WHICH SAHABA to follow? The vast majority of Muslims (Hanafis) follow the rulings of Umar (ra) & ibn Masud (ra) and Ali (ra) and all of their Students. This is what Hanafi Fiqh /Madhab teaches. This is the Sunnah that these Sahaba taught that we follow! You Salafis hates this because you follow albani, binBaz, uthaymeen, fawzan, ibn taimiyyah etc and you have changed Islam into something different.
Which Hadith, other than God and His revelations, do they uphold? [45:6] The Quran is not a fabricated Hadith; ...it details everything. [12:111] Some people uphold vain Hadith to divert others from the path of God. [31:6] The only Sunna to follow shall be God's Sunna. [17:77, 33:62, 48:23, 6:114] Quran 7:185 Which Hadith, beside this(Quran), do they believe in? The Quran informs us that some enemies of the Prophet, described as "human and jinn devils," will fabricate lies and attribute them to the Prophet (6:112, 25:31). This is precisely what happened after the prophet Muhammad's death That's why👉 Quran 17:46 ..And when you preach your Lord, using the *QURAN ALONE* ,* they run away in aversion
farid please debunk wassem yousef next , he's a muslim (idk about making takfir on him but he has said insane things) I think but he makes really absurd claims and lies about Islam but since he has the garb on and speaks in Arabic alot of people think he's trustworthy.
Please do an objective study of Muhamed ibn Abdulwehab. In you style, because I hear that he was an inspiration for ISIS. I hear that a lot of massacres have been committed and that he used the tawheed as a political weapon. Please do this study in an objective way, I really like your style
@AhlulAlHaqq-cj4me i don't know Arabic and the sources used to prove what I said in the previous comment are wahabi sources of the people of najd around that time. I liked how Farid did the divisions between sahaba and I really enjoyed listening and learning from it. That's why I would really enjoy having a series on Muhammad ibn Abdulwehab.
[Quran 6:38] We did not leave anything out of this book. [Quran 7:52] We have given them a scripture that is fully detailed, with knowledge, guidance, and mercy for the people who believe. [Quran 18:27] You shall recite what is revealed to you of your Lord's scripture. Nothing shall abrogate His words, and you shall not find any other source beside it. [Quran 6:114] Shall I seek other than God as a source of law, when He has revealed to you this book fully detailed?* Those who received the scripture recognize that it has been revealed from your Lord, truthfully. You shall not harbor any doubt. [Quran 45:6] These are God's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than God and His revelations do they believe? Quran [5:99] The sole duty of the messenger is to deliver the message, and God knows everything you declare and everything you conceal.
_An-Nisa' __4:59_ يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓا۟ أَطِيعُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا۟ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُو۟لِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْۖ فَإِن تَنَٰزَعْتُمْ فِى شَىْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَٱلرَّسُولِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْءَاخِرِۚ ذَٰلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا *_"O you who have believed, obey Allāh and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allāh and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allāh and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result."_*
The Qur'an confirms that the job of the messenger is to teach the book. Also Allah did not leave out anything of the Qur'an that was of that importance which was relating to its message. The Qur'an was and is essentially a book of guidance regarding faith
@@sajO5754 LOOOL you people get hung up on stupid things like Rakas. What's wrong with you? It's not about Rakas. It's about praying at the right times, which means remembering God by reciting his Qur'an at certain times in the day. That's all he wants you to do And he told you only about 3 times, not about 5. And he told you in the Qur'an to stand, bow and prostrate when you pray. But he even said that in some situations, you can just remember him by whilst riding or walking. And that's fine. So then there's no Rakas either. Rakas is nothing but tradition. It's not a hard set rule in stone. He never said you must do this many Rakas, otherwise your prayer is not accepted - that's nonesense. And these traditions, people changed anyway. Because they added more and more Rakas. You people don't realise this and are so brainwashed by the rules that these scholars made up. Prayer to you is nothing more than a ritual of going through the rules, to avoid hellfire. Well if that's all it is, if you just pray for the sake of ritual and doing "the right number of Rakas every day", your prayers become meaningless and won't be accepted. Prayer is not about Rakas. Read the Qur'an - it says it's about remembrance of God
Sure, the approval of a story of a spider protecting an army with its web is strenghening Islam... That is a weak argument. And I leave to ponder about the splitting of the moon in this regard.
😂😂😂😂 the hadiths comes 200 years after the QURAN YOU RIGHT TO FIX IT, CAUSE ITS ALL OVER THE PLACE AND DOESN'T MAKE SENSE , if the quran stays like that how people going to explain and understand the meaning of it 😂😂😂 by the way if the ( QURAN FROM HEAVEN WHY THEIRS MANY COVER UP AND LIES TRYING TO FIX WHAT IS WRITTEN ) 😂😂😂
the Hadith didn't come after the prophet with 200 the collection of burahi comed after the prophet with 200 but most books about Hadith are not far from the time of the prophet
You follow bukhari which was compiled 200 years after Muhammad. Just a fact mate. Cannot escape from that. Just as a fact as you follow human non prophet efforts of compiling and deciding what is sahih and not. Just as it’s a fact that all of this has not been given authority from Allah and His messenger. Facts.
That's not how you do history lmao Check the chains of narrations across different books of Hadith. Many Hadith gathered from the salaf were done so over wide geographical areas. If someone from Syria narrates a Hadith and someone from Spain does the same Hadith from the same narrators, then that would confirm that the Hadith are indeed not fabricated. And there are thousands of Hadith like those.
0:23 first question: Why do you still have weak ahadith in your classical works, why aren't they removed?
3:26 second question: Why do you Muslims authenticate ahadith that you like, and reject ahadith which you dislike? 💀 I've heard this a lot 😭
5:07 3rd question or claim. Authors of hadith works are the ones who fabricated ahadith and ahadith are 200 years old or even older. I've heard this one a lot too, mostly by Qur'an only people.
As-salamu aleykum and may Allah bless you brother Farid
Thanks for timestamps. 🥲
@@FaridResponds no problem ya ustadh. 🥲
@@FaridResponds I forgot the cat stamp 😭 5:19
Reason we still have weak ( or even blasphemous) Hadith in our kutub because in Hadith science or discipline a weak hadees is still useful (5%) for fatwa or in fiq...
1:05 sorry' brother but you're wrong.. nobody would have notices or thought about those controversies if we don't have it on our books.. and for islamaphob they don't care weak dhaif etc for them they have different uslool criteria..it called criteria of embarrassment..
Could you turn this into a series “common claims about…”
For the second episode you could talk about common claims about the Quran.
BarakAllahu Feekum.
Hadith system is just like version control system in software development field. Old mistakes and changes are never removed so we can trace them all the way back to the originals and know where and why changes were made.
As a computer science student, this is the best analogy for me 😂 jazakallahu khayr
This analogy saved me almost half an hour on UA-cam 😂
A Weak / Fabricated Hadith in Islam is the whole bible in Christianity 😅
nah
actually even a fabricated hadith is stronger than the bible because we know why it is fabricated and which person in the chain has problems. In the case of the bible, it was written by anonymous authors.
@@IBAR_DAWAH you're right brother
I wonder how Bible verses would be graded by hadith standards. Fabricated? Da'eef jiddan?
You mean better than bible. Brother please edit your language as it is implying that Hadith and bible are similar.
@@IBAR_DAWAHthats correct
We need more videos on hadith sciences, barakAllahu feek.
I have been trable by understanding Hadith.. because they don't teach you how to deal with it.. they left you with lslamaphob to give understanding..
This is why I love Farid. He's not one of those youtube scholars, he's actually educated. Jazaka Allah khair❤
@@thecrow6388 Daif cannot be used as argument to prove or disprove anything. Daif and maudu are both rejected. Maudu is just rejected more strongly
@@thecrow6388 💀💀bruh trust me you're the one that needs to speak to his teacher. Daif is classified weak for a reason, it's unreliable. Daif are not usable to derive any juridical ruling or practice although scholars can use the stories when it comes to teaching good values.
That's all there is to it. If I'm wrong, please name me one single daif hadith that scholars used in order to argue about something serious. I'll wait.
@@abdelhalimtarek bro come on you gotta be joking
Farid is very learnt in hadith, you can't argue that, he's giving a valid scholarly perspective
2) I think you're just making up reasons not to like him cuz making videos while driving is normal + it doesn't affect the quality + some people are busier than you think so they multi-task
@@thecrow6388daaif hadiths are not hujja buddy
@@thecrow6388 No the quran which is mutawatir and the sahih ahadith are hujja unlike weak hadiths
Are u an athiest?🤣
This is highly precious knowledge. JazakhAllahu khaira!
The more that I learn about the Hadith Sciences, the stronger my imaan becomes. When I was younger-may Allah forgive me-I leaned towards the arguments of the Sunnah deniers, but that stopped as soon as I started learning about the magnificent work that the scholars of Hadith have done to preserve our religion free from interpolation and corruption. The preservation of the Sunnah is one of the subjects these makes me so proud to be a Muslim, and I advise you to start learning about it. A good place to start is to read the books of Dr. Mustafa al-A’zami. He wrote books about the preservation of both the Sunnah and also about the preservation of the Noble Qur’an. They’re a must-read.
So having said that, I affirm that every authentic hadith-whether mutawaatir or ahaad-is just as binding upon every Muslim as any verse of the Noble Qur’an. The Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah are both revelation, and are inseparable parts of Islam. Do NOT deceive yourself into thinking that Islam without the Sunnah is Islam at all. Sunnah denial is apostasy, so learn the Sunnah.
Barak Allah feek
I ask Allah to protect you and reward you with the best in dunya and akhirah ameen
Wait, Farid Finally got a Quality camera? Allahumma barik
Well explained brother Farid may Allah protects you 😊
Why keep weak Hadith?
First of all the weak Hadith have no effect in core belief 'Aqida', No weak hadith will say God has a son or God is Human etc..
Sometimes a hadith is weakened due to having little information about a narrator integrity or his birth place, dwelling place or mental health.
thus its kept until further investigation is done !!!!
Depending on very "strict conditions" as having other Sahih hadith from other ways (chains) they may be referenced or glanced upon but they serve no more than that.
So my answer is:
Out of fear of losing even a tiny bit of revelation
Why then keep fabrications & claims?
Because lies & fabrications are recycled, it helps knowing their origin & the kind of people whom spread them 😎
YES !!! we Even have narration chains of fabrication while other religions fail to provide a chain for their cannon books 😁
JazakumAllahu Khayran
New Lighting and Camera..?Everything Looks Amazing. Farid is ready to go Pro
Farid looking clearer than my eyesight ma Sha Allah tabaarakallahu feekum.
Where as the Christian tried to hide their "Apocryphal" books
You just need to get quotes of their church fathers to expose them on this when they deny this
That was my question today on ramzi video today exact 10 hours before..this video reached me automatically
The thumbnail posing at the end 😂😂😂😂😂
Potato Cam
2019-2023
R. I. P.
{Recycled in Pieces}
Jazakallahkheir. But i got a question. What do you think of the Sahifa of Hamam bin Munabih as the earliest wriiten record of hadith. Do you think its authentic?
It is.
@@FaridRespondshow many hadith contains there...?
Jazaka Llahu Khairan
jazaak Allahu gayran
Assalaamu alaykum brother, I was thinking if you can make a video explaining the science of Hadiths in authenticating the narrations of the prophet Muhammad peace be upon him while comparing it to how it is different from how the first Christians scholars collected the manuscripts and decided to introduced them into their bible… , I guess you got my point.
(And prepare for the clash)
The reason I said that is because I think a lot of Christians don’t understand what we are talking about when we talk about the authenticity of the Hadiths, so I guess an explanation of the science of Hadiths while bringing examples and comparing them to how biblical texts got into the Bible will be helpful to make them understand the concept, and Allah knows best.
اللهم بارك
بارك الله فيك
5:22 KITTY KITTY
BarakaAllahoufik
About the second question, ive heard some christians use this hadith to prove that we authenticate ahadith based on whether we like it or not:
Abu Humayd reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “If you hear a narration from me that your hearts recognize, settles your hair and skin, and you see it as close to you, then I am most deserving of it. If you hear a narration from me that your hearts reject, makes your hair stand and your skin crawl, and you see it as far from you, then I am the furthest from it.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 15725
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Arna’ut
How should we respond to this?
Problem with their understanding or it is weak
Simple, "did you know prophet Muhammad SAW? What his teaching. What he done. What he experienced. To win this participation trophy, you need to learn for the people of religion. Not some wacky ass David Wood, CPrincess, Hantun, Sam Shamoun, Nabeel Quraisy (which never a Muslim)
this is the understanding of the hadith
Your hearts recognize,” meaning: the heart accepts it, and it does not cause disturbance to the soul. This is either by presenting it to the known principles of religion, so if it does not contradict it, the heart accepts it, or by knowing the men of the chain of transmission, for if they are trustworthy and proven, the heart will rush to accept it, and it is possible that this hadith is Such as: “Consult your heart. Righteousness is what the soul is at ease with and the heart is at ease with, and sin is what troubles the soul and hesitates in the chest, even if the people tries to convince you that it's good.” A hasan hadith, narrated by Ahmad [4/228] and Al-Darimi [2/246] and others, as in Al-Arba’in by Al-Nawawi, may God Almighty have mercy on him. This is to be interpreted as referring to the suspected command, otherwise what is commanded in the Sharia without opposition is righteousness, and whatever is proven to be prohibited is sin, and what is meant is that the heart of the believer looks with the light of God if he has strong faith... This requires that It is necessary to refer to the known and proven principles of the religion in what is doubtful in the hadith, and God Almighty knows best
If you know prophet Muhammad characters, if you heard something that against his characters, you know something wrong with that hadith
@@TMasterGamssthanks bro
Also to show the students how to tell weak hadith from strong ones
TBF you sometimes see Muslims doing #2. Like I sometimes see people going "weak/fabricated hadith!" about the hadiths referring to A'isha's age... in Sahih al-Bukhari
Yes there are other sources that suggest her age as 16/26 and 19/29. But we still have to answer them and Alhamdullilah we do.
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
كيف حالك يا شيخنا ووالدنا ونورنا
@@thestudentofknowledge وعليكم السلام و رحمة الله و بركاته
I think another reason to the first question is "Documentation"... in any scholarly studies it helps to document... if one finds the same report in the future at least there is a documentation of it to help further research or study...
Peace Farid,
In your book, The Necessity of Hadith, on pages 45-46 you wrote:
FARID: “Quranist conflate the word hadith meaning statement in the verse, with the “prophetic hadith” that we are all used to today.”
The operative term in your statement, of course, is ‘hadith.’ Your position, along with that of Sunni Islam paradigm, attempts to, advertently or inadvertently, undermine the nature of a rhetorical question in general, and the rhetorical question 45:6 in specific. This approach is not rational/logical. The nature of a rhetorical question is to make a point, not to seek a literal answer. In fact, by its nature, a rhetorical question is incapable of expecting a literal answer; seeking one would defeat its purpose.
Surah 45:6 poses a rhetorical question, whose intent is not to seek information as a standard question does, but to affirm the book/Quran’s authority, completeness, and sufficiency to guide. It simultaneously negates the notion that following sources other than the Book/the Quran for guidance is unacceptable to Allah. Thus, suggesting that ‘some hadith’ are acceptable to Allah contradicts the rhetorical nature of 45:6, not to mention other clear verses which state the Book/the Quran is fully detailed and sufficient to guide.
Again, a rhetorical question, by its nature, cannot be treated as if it’s seeking a literal answer. A rhetorical question cannot simultaneously be rhetorical and not rhetorical. Likewise, sufficient cannot mean sufficient and simultaneously mean not sufficient. Thus, 45:6 precludes any extra-Quranic hadith from being used as guidance in Deen Al-Islam.
45:6 These are the communications/ayats of Allah which We recite to you with the truth; then in what announcement/hadith would they believe after Allah and His communications/ayats?
45:6, then, is a blanket command by Allah that NO hadith is acceptable to Him relative to guidance, except, His hadith the Book/the Quran: 39:23:
39:23 Allah has revealed the best announcement/hadith, a book conformable in its various parts, repeating, whereat do shudder the skins of those who fear their Lord, then their skins and their hearts become pliant to the remembrance of Allah; this is Allah's guidance, He GUIDES WITH IT whom He pleases; and (as for) him whom Allah makes err, there is no guide for him.
45:6 and 39:23, among other verses, establishes that the Book/The Quran is fully detailed and sufficient for guidance, and simultaneously rejects hadith, “prophetic” or otherwise for guidance.
ARGUMENT FOR THE SUFFICIENCY OF THE BOOK/THE QURAN
P1. If Allah is the Truth, and the Truth is from Allah, and Allah speaks the Truth, and none is truer in word than Allah, then all claims made by Allah are necessarily true claims.
P2. If Allah’s claims are necessarily true claims, then Allah’s claims cannot contradict each other.
P3. If Allah claims something to be sufficient for a particular purpose, then He cannot simultaneously claim that same thing is not sufficient for that particular purpose.
P4. If Allah claims that Hell is sufficient to burn, He is sufficient to guide, and the Book/The Quran is sufficient to guide, then these are necessarily true claims.
Therefore:
C1. Allah’s claim that He is sufficient to guide and that Book/The Quran is sufficient to guide are necessarily true claims.
Therefore:
C2. Allah’s claim the Book/the Quran is fully detailed is necessarily a true claim.
Therefore:
C3. The claim that the sunnah/hadith books are to be followed along with the Book/the Quran for guidance is necessarily a false claim.
Therefore:
C4. The claim that “obey the Messenger” means the sunnah/hadith books are to be followed along with the Book/the Quran for guidance is necessarily a false claim.
Therefore:
C5. The claim that solaa is a ritual prayer is necessarily a false claim.
Therefore:
C6. The claim that “the Quran only” position is false, is necessarily a false claim. ***(See below)***
PROOF TEXT:
P1: 31:30; 4:170; 33:4; 10:82; 4:122; 4:82
P2. 4:82
P3. 4:82
P4. 4:55; 25:31; 29:51
Therefore:
C1. 6:114; 41:3
C2. 6:114; 41:3
C3. 45:6; 6:114; 41:3
C4. 25:31; 45:6; 6:114; 41:3
C5. 45:6; 29:51; 6:114; 41:3
C6. All the above
***P1. If the Messenger received wahy apart from the Quran, then the “Quran
only” position is false.
P2.The Messenger received wahy apart from the Quran.
C1. Therefore: the Quran only” position is false.
C2. Therefore: the position that the sunnah and hadith books cannot be
followed as guidance along with the Book/the Quran, is false.***
C2. Is my addition to the argument; it was not apart of the original syllogism written by Jake.
Looking forward to your reply!
Tariq-
Farid got a set up upgrade????
Good stuff
Wait...We lost the potato camera? What timeline are we living in?
If you have truly studied the fundamentals of Ahadith, you would know that a hadith is classified as either true or false-there's no in-between. When we refer to a hadith as 'weak,' it doesn't imply the content is weak; rather, it indicates a flaw in the chain of narration.
In other words, a 'weak hadith' classification doesn't render the hadith itself false/fabricated; it's the integrity of the narrators in the chain that is questionable. So, if a hadith compiler points out a weakness in the character of one or more individuals among the 6-10 in the chain, it doesn't automatically invalidate the entire hadith. Moreover, what may be considered weak by one compiler, such as Imam Bukhari, could be deemed authentic by another, like Imam Abu Hanifa.
It's crucial to note that not all hadiths were compiled simultaneously; many compilers lived centuries apart. Therefore, a chain of narration that appears weak to one scholar might be accepted as authentic by another, especially if the first few individuals in the chain are found to be reliable.
Unless two hadiths convey conflicting messages, it is encouraged to follow them. In case of a contradiction, efforts should be made to reconcile the teachings of both hadiths. If reconciliation is impossible, the more authentic narration takes precedence. That's where the classifications come into play, and there is an entire field study that employs a comprehensive methodology to navigate these complexities.
Those who outright reject a hadith due to its 'weak' classification are essentially hadith rejectors, period!
Bear in mind that hadith is gotten from hearsay. There is no guarantee from Allah SWT that it is perfect.
@letmetalk2240, and you know how the Quran reached you, right?
"In other words, a 'weak hadith' classification doesn't render the hadith itself false/fabricated; it's the integrity of the narrators in the chain that is questionable. So, if a hadith compiler points out a weakness in the character of one or more individuals among the 6-10 in the chain, it doesn't automatically invalidate the entire hadith. " you lost me there
If in a chain you have a weak narrator, then his statement of it being conveyed by someone above him in the chain who's reliable will still render the Hadith weak because we're still relying on the weak narrator's statement of it coming from a reliable person.
Imo, you're attempting to validate the weak ahadith found in Hanafi madhab but unfortunately for you, scholars from the salaf have criticised Imam Abu hanifa ra in matters of hadith while acknowledging the greatness of his fiqh.
@@spawnnpwn4166the mistakes of abu hanifa were fixed by his students. And no he was not weak in hadith this is just a popular criticism by the psudosalfis
Hadiths are not the real source of religion. We can only see them as a rumor or maybe historical sources of this religion but not as a word of God or as a word of his messenger. Allah never told us in the Quran that "Go and follow rumors or hadiths after Mohammed is dead. He said Quran is enough and he elobareted Quran so no one will need a second explanation for the religion." God says in the Quran that follow the messenger. If he is dead follow Quran only and correct yourself with Quran. Quran is enough and you will be questioned from Quran in the day of judgment. You just love so much your ancestor's false teachings more than God's teachings in Quran that makes the religion into a corrupted and complex religion. Leave your ancestors false traditions and follow only Quran to fix yourself. Quran says you can read Torah, Bible to understand teachings of God but not hadiths. We muslims shouldn't do that to understand what God wants from us. (I know Quran has transcribed after the messenger is dead so don't tell me Quran is also hadith and yes Quran is also a hadith tells you to leave other so called hadiths except Quran) May peace and God be with us.
You just actually lied about the Qur'an, Allah says in the Qur'an 'If he was killed or died, would you turn back on your heels?', meaning even if the Messenger ﷺ was to be killed or died even at the time when he lived & this goes for those after, one must still follow him. Allah never says FOLLOW ONLY QUR'AN IF THE MESSENGER DIES. This is a lie about Allah and about Qur'an. Problem is that people like you:
1. Can't even read the Qur'an
2. Make up lies to suit your desires
3. Lie about the Qur'an
4. Even after being shown proof, you still turn away even from what the Qur'an says.
So don't play around with the Qur'an as there are plenty of us who understand it, learn it, teach it and can refute you on every single claim.
Cut the nonsense and return back to Allah and follow his Messenger as you're commanded to. If not then spare people of your evil as it won't work.
Ok, who told that this book is the Quran that Allah told you to follow?
@@assassinwithalqalam Look, you have a point that I didn't tell that part was my interpretation; "If he is dead follow Quran only and correct yourself with Quran." but you didn't understand what God wanted from us, that's for sure, he didn't want us to follow our ancestors after his messenger death, he wanted us to follow Quran or (what it remained) after his death. If a messenger dies (which is also happened), Allah ofc would want us to follow his words and teachings in our memory. I'm just saying these words are transcribed after his death but not the rumors of the prophet. That means Quran can be the only source of the religion. If hadiths also would be necessary for these teachings, they would also include these rumors to Quran but they didn't. If you think I'm lying, answer me, why hadiths werent part of the Quran? Because they knew that it wasn't important during that period. Quran was enough for them. May Allah give you peace and freedom to leave extremism.
@@user-co8uf1mj6c Who told you that hadiths are the words of prophet? People who followed these words for centuries of course. It implies the same for Quran. I didn't say rumors are totally fake, I said that rumors can be historical evidence for the religion but not the religion itself. You don't get my point here. May Allah help you to get.
@@yigitcanozturk8475 if they are both historically proven you should follow both so both are the religion.
Assalamu alaikum brother
Would suggest to add a background to the text you add in the thumbnail and write the most important thing in bold
I can create simple thumbnails for you for free, just want to help
Farid no one has answered me this question I hope you will. Why when we have some many books of primary Hadith apart from the 9 known ones no one has been able to authenticate the sahih from daef and translate them and make the available freely online like the 9 known books are. This is Soo unfair for the ummah
Question no 3... this cannot be a blanket accusation... it has to be per report basis... I think anyone can see that. And collected does not mean created... if I collect and publish a book on Aesop fables that has bird stories in them today, I am not creating those fables only today... again, I think anyone can see that.
I do follow most Hadith i just understand that is may or may not be true. Too many contradict the Quran. I did not leave Christianity to follow Bukari.
I left for monotheism
Authentic hadiths do not contradict the Quran
It is the scholars who determine the evaluation of the hadith, not the general public
You don't tell the doctor what he should do in his specialty
Authentic hadith can't contradict quran, btw the modern secular view of quran goes aline with hadith literature
@@الحقيقةالمغيبة-خ9خ actually I have told doctors exactly what to do and that's exactly what I needed and they agreed with me. I am legitimately alive because of it. The thing is I'm inside my own body and the doctor is not so I know what I'm going through uniquely based off of what I'm feeling or they may not because my linguistic skills may not be able to express the points that I'm feeling in the dialect that has been given to me.
But we're not talking about that
My question for both of you. There are four schools of accepted thought amongst scholars just on variations on prayer alone. With your "souls" on the line do you know exactly how Prophet Muhammad(saw) prayed? For me I only know those four schools and how they prayed I do not know exactly how our beloved prophet prayed EXACTLY.
I follow a large majority of Hadith even though some I find to be quite suspect. However I do not overburden myself with a part of the religion that I do not find concrete.
To even associate the Hadith alongside the Quran as divine I find blasphemous.
I can associate the Hadith to be more reliable than the Bible. More reliable than written history. But there is no second or third place next to the Quran. Literally nothing.
Why is the concept of a "weak" hadith being discussed as though it is a FALSE or FABRICATED hadith? A hadith being "weak" is mainly because of its sanad and its classification is also based on an opinion/criticism of an individual. It does not mean that the content of the hadith itself is necessarily NOT TRUE.
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
there are conditions as to what daif hadiths can be followed bro
can you name a orientalist that copes about narrators in 1st century from hijri were fabricating hadiths?
Yea i want to hear about these butthurt clowns too
Farid brother, how come you don't trim your moustache?
❤️❤️❤️❤️🌹🌹🌹
Why don‘t you make a video addressing Joshua Little’s 21 reasons hadiths are not historically reliable?
I always ask: Which argument is actually tough?
No answer.
I might just do a response for the sake of doing one.
@@FaridResponds Farid respond to Race Car (RC) on a point every Tafsir explains! Such a worthy response to spend your time on! well.. Maybe (I'm being sarcastic)
و عليك السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته إن شاء الله
you disbeliever!
Hadith = 100000 bibles true statements
Islam = Qur’an and Sunnah.
We have never followed Hadith Books directly.
We follow Fiqh Books written by specialists who extract the Sunnah from the Hadith Books.
حديث "انا ابن الذبيحين" ضعيف مع انه في صالح المسلمين
How can compiler fabricate it as much as i know Ali ibn Talib ,and Abdullah ibn e Musud always wrote what Prophet said.Apart from that if this case of fabrication of hadith by Bukhari than why m aware of this fact that even his father had works much in compiling hadiths.
1. Why do you still have weak narrations in your books? (why not change your books like we have changed our books?)
2. You authenticate what you like and inauthenticate what you don't like. (you have already changed your books like we have changed ours)
3. The authors of Hadith fabricated Hadith because Hadith books are 200 years after the Prophet PBUH. (Why dont' you have the same problem that we have)
The last one is pointless because of the rigorously authenticated multiple chains of narrations. It is impossible to fabricate such a network of human beings across space and time.
i have a question akhi: how are we sure the books on ilm al rijal are narrated accurately till our time? I guess they have sanad too? But how do you check their sanad?
My advice would be for you to study usul al-hadith. Then your questions will be answered satisfactorily. There are things you are assuming about ilm al-rijal due to a lack of knowledge.
@@faiyazkhan5970 so you dont know the answer either
Weak hadiths(not clearly fabricated ones)are much better than opinions of fulan or fulan
Refute Al-muqaddimah guy who claims to be muslim about prophets biography
You're the first person to make this request. I haven't seen his channel before. What is the specific allegation that requires a refutation?
@@FaridRespondshe uses historical critical method on Islamic history and sources.
Some of his conclusions are different from our tradional narratives.
I am interested in what you have to say of him.
@@lordtaseen2947 That's quite general. I'd need something specific to critique.
@@FaridResponds he believes in hadith, but he doesn't like use in his channel, because western who interested in Islam
Your first argument does not make much sense. For the average layman navigating hadith literature is difficult, it definitely is a specialised field which is why scholars spend a life time studying them. The quranic ayats have a context to them we generally know when they were revealed what was going on and what problem was being addressed, but for some hadith this context is missing which can lead to a diverse range of opinions, which extreme groups in our history like ISIS will exploit, especially around rights of minorities, apostacy, blasphemy, punishments etc Also I have always wondered why our prophet pbuh or his close companions upon his death never institutionalised the preservation and authenticity of his sayings whilst avoiding them being conflated with quranic ayats, this would have been a logical thing to do rather than wait some 200 years later for it to happen, which is what happened to the christian NT, and we have the results of that before us ! When Islamaphobes come after us it is usually with weaker hadith or more authentic ones without their historical context, either way it becomes easy for them to debunk Islam when they go after hadith literature and then we have to spend a very long time addressing this.
Well, if youre a layman you probably shouldnt be getting into books like the works of at-Tabari. We have plenty of hadith books that only have authentic ahadith, but, if an authour wants to show weaker hadith anyway, we should respect that.
People who attack islam literally use whatever they can, they dont just take hadith out of context. They take many quran verses out of context too.
You already admitted that you're a layman so don't talk about it. Secondly, who says 200 years passed? And who says the sahabah radiya Allahu anhum didn't write ahadeeth down? This is the problem with people who reject ahadeeth.
100 years passed when hadith books started getting published. Secondly while the main messege of Quran is self explanatory, many of its verses have context which we precisely know from hadiths. The preservation was not a concern during the time of sahabah. However Quran needs to be absolutely exact in correct order and you get rewad by reciting it as opposed to hadiths. So the situation is not the same. Whereas publishing hadith books would have make many people give their focus only or mainly in hadiths as opposed to Quran which is not right.
@@condorianonegdiffsgoku i really hope you and others stop speaking without knowledge, it's embarrassing reading it
@@assassinwithalqalam
What did I write wrong?
Brother Farid, what exactly is "Hasan" hadith. Sometimes I even run into "Sahih Hasan". What does that mean?
Google it
@@user-co8uf1mj6cbad advice. A man is asking a question and you're asking him to look it up in sources that may or may not be written by Muslims.
Give him the answer, a book, or a reference or just keep going.
@@mohammedxiii nah, asking such questions means he doesn't use google enough, replying to me like this means it too.
@@user-co8uf1mj6c using more google isn't a good thing.
Is the report regarding the cave inauthentic or do scholars simply dispute on it?
It is incredibly popular in my locale and many believe in it.
It's not authentic
@@assassinwithalqalamwhat cave are we talking about
@@sfgdragoon when Rasoolu Allah ﷺ and Abu Bakr رضي الله عنه were hiding, not sure if you know the story? You can find it online in sha'a Allah for more context
@@assassinwithalqalam i dont knoe. But i assume this is some sort of story which circulates among the Desi or subcontinent then. Leave me to my assumptions ma fi mushkilah
@@sfgdragoon no it's also in the Qur'an and hadith but there are some details mentioned in other ahadeeth that are known because the stories are in the seerah books. Only thing is, those ahadeeth are weak and are circulated as authentic usually by people
*Bible vs Bible*
@ Matthew 17:21
KJB : 'Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.'
NIV : [Doesn't exist!!!]
@ Matthew 18:11
KJB : For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.
NIV: [Doesn't exist]
@ Mark 9:44 + Mark 9:46
NIV : where THEIR WORM DOES NOT DIE, AND THE FIRE IS NOT QUENCHED.
ESV : [Doesn't exist!!!]
@ Mark 11:26
NIV: [Doesn't exist!!]
KJB : But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses.
@ Mark 15:28
KJB : And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors.
NIV: [Doesn't exist!]
@ Mark 16:9-20 [Forgery]
why don't you deal with better arguments or even better invite someone with opposing views and have a respectful dialogue? refusing to do so makes you look deceptive and scared.
Why don't make a new book named "Saheeh Bukhari Authenticated version" or whatever...? Rather, u can't do that since muhadiths have different criteria of authenticating hadiths, so they aren't even agreeing on what is daif and what is not. Bukhari considers some hadiths in Sahih Muslim as daif and Muslim considers some hadiths to be daif in Sahih Bukhari for example. Why do u still pretend like it is clear what is authentic hadith and what is daif? Even daif hadith can be true, it is just not taken in sharia ruling due to seriousness of the matter, but like sheik Usaymin said, we can take weak hadiths for ibadah. So basically if some muhadiths classify hadirh as daif, it doesn't mean it is not true. And if some muhadiths classify hadith as saheeh, it doesn't mean it is true, since there can be other muhadiths who will consider that hadith as daif or even forged.. As for hadiths that are agreed upon to be sahih, it is still work of people and has contradictions. I am not saying this to follow Qur'an only, but we should follow hadiths too. If they happen to not be true, we are not to blame since the people who brought them to us are not knows as liars, rather as trustworthy, knowledgeable, pious people. We are not obligated to follow those that doesn't make sense or contradict each other. If someone doubts Islam due to some hadiths, do not reject Islam, reject those hadiths, since hadiths are not revelation, neither it is authenticated by God, rather by people who disagree with eachother upon its authenticity.
Islam = Qur’an and Sunnah.
We have never followed Hadith Books directly.
We follow Fiqh Books written by specialists who extract the Sunnah from the Hadith Books.
@@mikhan5191 that is even worse! If you followed sunnah according to ur understanding of hadiths, at least you will have your opinion. But you are actually saying that you follow other humans like you, and their opinion on hadiths...instead of using ur own brain. Don't be lazy and give your brain to others. Form ur opinion, do not blindly follow brother.
@@ahmedahmud5281 - what you are implying is DO NOT BLINDLY FOLLOW SAHABA!!!
That is kufr because you have rejected what our Prophet salallahu alayhiwasallam said and what the Qur'an says.
@@mikhan5191 which sahaba? The ones that says to pray with raising your hands at the start of salah only, or the ones who say to raise hands more time during prayer?
We are talking about not following some hadiths, not about not following sahabah. The only way we can follow sunnah is through sahabah. Kufr is only if u reject to follow Prophet s.a.w.s. As for sahabah, noone can follow them like following of Prophet s.a.w.s, since they disagreed what is sunnah and what is not, but whichever opinion of sahaba u take, in sha Allah u are following sunnah of Prophet s.a.w.s.
@@ahmedahmud5281 - so now you agree with us that we can Blind Follow the Sahaba! You previously stated "DON'T BLINDLY FOLLOW". Now you have changed your tune!
Your next question is WHICH SAHABA to follow?
The vast majority of Muslims (Hanafis) follow the rulings of Umar (ra) & ibn Masud (ra) and Ali (ra) and all of their Students.
This is what Hanafi Fiqh /Madhab teaches. This is the Sunnah that these Sahaba taught that we follow!
You Salafis hates this because you follow albani, binBaz, uthaymeen, fawzan, ibn taimiyyah etc and you have changed Islam into something different.
Which Hadith, other than God and His revelations, do they uphold? [45:6]
The Quran is not a fabricated Hadith; ...it details everything. [12:111]
Some people uphold vain Hadith to divert others from the path of God. [31:6]
The only Sunna to follow shall be God's Sunna. [17:77, 33:62, 48:23, 6:114]
Quran 7:185
Which Hadith, beside this(Quran), do they believe in?
The Quran informs us that some enemies of the Prophet, described as "human and jinn devils," will fabricate lies and attribute them to the Prophet (6:112, 25:31). This is precisely what happened after the prophet Muhammad's death
That's why👉 Quran 17:46
..And when you preach your Lord, using the *QURAN ALONE* ,* they run away in aversion
Silly arguments. I deal with this in my book by the way.
Is this benrahma saiid!?
farid please debunk wassem yousef next , he's a muslim (idk about making takfir on him but he has said insane things) I think but he makes really absurd claims and lies about Islam but since he has the garb on and speaks in Arabic alot of people think he's trustworthy.
Please do an objective study of Muhamed ibn Abdulwehab. In you style, because I hear that he was an inspiration for ISIS. I hear that a lot of massacres have been committed and that he used the tawheed as a political weapon.
Please do this study in an objective way, I really like your style
@AhlulAlHaqq-cj4me i don't know Arabic and the sources used to prove what I said in the previous comment are wahabi sources of the people of najd around that time.
I liked how Farid did the divisions between sahaba and I really enjoyed listening and learning from it. That's why I would really enjoy having a series on Muhammad ibn Abdulwehab.
That is the best I agree but I would need quite sometime to achieve it.
[Quran 6:38] We did not leave anything out of this book.
[Quran 7:52] We have given them a scripture that is fully detailed, with knowledge, guidance, and mercy for the people who believe.
[Quran 18:27] You shall recite what is revealed to you of your Lord's scripture. Nothing shall abrogate His words, and you shall not find any other source beside it.
[Quran 6:114] Shall I seek other than God as a source of law, when He has revealed to you this book fully detailed?* Those who received the scripture recognize that it has been revealed from your Lord, truthfully. You shall not harbor any doubt.
[Quran 45:6] These are God's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than God and His revelations do they believe?
Quran [5:99] The sole duty of the messenger is to deliver the message, and God knows everything you declare and everything you conceal.
keep doing it, KORAN is nonesense to them when they need 10,000 people and their lord-bukhari and muslim to narrate them the religion.
How many rakhat do we pray?
How do we do hajj?
Do you belive in the last sermon of the prophet pbuh?.....ect ect.
_An-Nisa' __4:59_
يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓا۟ أَطِيعُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا۟ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُو۟لِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْۖ فَإِن تَنَٰزَعْتُمْ فِى شَىْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَٱلرَّسُولِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْءَاخِرِۚ ذَٰلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا
*_"O you who have believed, obey Allāh and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allāh and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allāh and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result."_*
The Qur'an confirms that the job of the messenger is to teach the book.
Also Allah did not leave out anything of the Qur'an that was of that importance which was relating to its message. The Qur'an was and is essentially a book of guidance regarding faith
@@sajO5754 LOOOL you people get hung up on stupid things like Rakas. What's wrong with you? It's not about Rakas. It's about praying at the right times, which means remembering God by reciting his Qur'an at certain times in the day. That's all he wants you to do
And he told you only about 3 times, not about 5. And he told you in the Qur'an to stand, bow and prostrate when you pray. But he even said that in some situations, you can just remember him by whilst riding or walking. And that's fine. So then there's no Rakas either. Rakas is nothing but tradition. It's not a hard set rule in stone. He never said you must do this many Rakas, otherwise your prayer is not accepted - that's nonesense.
And these traditions, people changed anyway. Because they added more and more Rakas. You people don't realise this and are so brainwashed by the rules that these scholars made up. Prayer to you is nothing more than a ritual of going through the rules, to avoid hellfire. Well if that's all it is, if you just pray for the sake of ritual and doing "the right number of Rakas every day", your prayers become meaningless and won't be accepted. Prayer is not about Rakas. Read the Qur'an - it says it's about remembrance of God
Sure, the approval of a story of a spider protecting an army with its web is strenghening Islam... That is a weak argument. And I leave to ponder about the splitting of the moon in this regard.
An army of... Two people?
Go back to Quran Farid 😅...pls learn from DR Hany Atchan😅😅
Lol. The absolute nut that one becomes when they become an apologist. Thank you for making us atheists.
based on your name its fair to say you were never muslim to begin with
but as per usual
islam is rent free in the minds of kafirs such as yourself
lol
Troll usually leaves negative comment.
At least we don't become children of 🐒
Ya ibn 🦧
Typical street sh1tter and mass r@p1$t saying nothing of value. The usual.
😂😂😂😂 the hadiths comes 200 years after the QURAN YOU RIGHT TO FIX IT, CAUSE ITS ALL OVER THE PLACE AND DOESN'T MAKE SENSE , if the quran stays like that how people going to explain and understand the meaning of it 😂😂😂 by the way if the ( QURAN FROM HEAVEN WHY THEIRS MANY COVER UP AND LIES TRYING TO FIX WHAT IS WRITTEN ) 😂😂😂
the Hadith didn't come after the prophet with 200 the collection of burahi comed after the prophet with 200 but most books about Hadith are not far from the time of the prophet
You follow bukhari which was compiled 200 years after Muhammad. Just a fact mate. Cannot escape from that. Just as a fact as you follow human non prophet efforts of compiling and deciding what is sahih and not. Just as it’s a fact that all of this has not been given authority from Allah and His messenger. Facts.
That's not how you do history lmao
Check the chains of narrations across different books of Hadith.
Many Hadith gathered from the salaf were done so over wide geographical areas. If someone from Syria narrates a Hadith and someone from Spain does the same Hadith from the same narrators, then that would confirm that the Hadith are indeed not fabricated. And there are thousands of Hadith like those.