🟢 Try Speakly with first 7 days for free and get 60% discount on an annual subscription: speakly.app.link/goodtimesbadtimes 📌 Support GTBT on Patreon! www.patreon.com/GTBT ➡ Paypal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/GoodTimesBadTimes
Indians don't need to do anything. Pakistan will break into many pieces. some of which will be taken back by India. rest will be used as a buffer zone against Islamic Middle Eastern threats. Pakistan will not exist or it will be a landlocked state forever fighting 3 front war. We had 4 wars and countless terrorist attacks in India. why do you think India will & should start trade and resurrect Pakistan from its grave? Maybe you need to watch your own video again to understand the stakes.
Pakistanis & India same culture??They why doesn't your country invite a single Muslim immigrant??They can learn Polish and u folks can have the same culture right? Please make a video inviting them,put in your points lest u be a huge Hypocrite. And we r "poor". Return the 45 + trillion dollars stolen from us in 200 yrs rule first.Thiefs r better quiet. Btw u can join the graveyard next to u called Ukraine and create a new country names Grave-o-Polandaine. A new energetic vassal state of USA..🤣 Ur IQ permits only this
I mean the reason is quite obvious India doesn't take them seriously, they openly hid bin laden and their army general called him a martyr. No negotiations with terrorists
India invaded illegally Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir against the wishes of Kashmiris and occupied it illegally and forcefully with 800000 terrorist Indian army which myrterd one lakh Kashmiris because kashmiris wanted there right of self-determination according to UN resolution. Illegally Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir is not a part of india it is a disputed territory according to UN resolution between Pakistan and terrorist India.
I swear, between this channel, Peter Zeihan, Kings and Generals, and countless other military/history channels… I’ve managed to get a minor in History/Geopolitics education level on the subject. Great stuff here as always - love from America to our Polish brothers
11:46 India's first nuclear test was in 1974 (Smiling Buddha). 1998 was the second nuclear test (Pokhran-II). Also, i would like to mention that the civilian leadership on both sides have made attempts at improving ties but there would usually be a terror attack after a thaw in relations making any long term improvement in ties politically untenable. If India and Pakistan were to normalise ties then the Pakistani army would lose it's primacy in domestic politics.
Yes but on the other end, whenever there was attempts at improving ties the Hindutvas in India would attack Muslims in an effort to start a conflict with pakistans co-religionists (I.e. gujarat riots, ayodhya in 1991 and varanasi in 2021) making any long term improvement in ties politically untenable. If india and pakistan were to normalize ties then the Hindutvas movement (previously manifested as the RSS, currently manifested as the BJP and indias ruling Modi-regime) would lose its primacy in domestic politics.
@@markm5758proud islamic republic of Pakistan has problem with hindutva 😂😂😂 we know situation of ahmedia hazara pashtun baloch muhajir hindu shia sikhs in Pakistan Pakistan should be last country to lecture india on human rights minorities and democracy
Thank you for pointing out that the primary reason for India not agreeing to peace talks is the political instability of Pakistan. Political commentators love to blame it on Indian populism or stubbornness. Even if that were to be true, there are always two ends of a rope.
It is more than that... When we are having talks with pakistani leadership... Their military will go on an adventure without even telling their PM... This happened in 1999.... In last decade only... First military helped nawaz sharif become PM... Then they replaced nawaz with imran... Then they replaced imran with nawaz's brother.... Whom do you speak to.... Also Pakistan has unilatetally attacked us 5 times... They were defeated every time is another story.... But they are not a group of people whom you can talk to
We dont know whom we should talk to. General Bajwa, Imraan Khan or Shehbaz Sharif. If we look democratically than Imran Khan. If we look realistically than General Bajwa. If we just talk to the PM than Shehbaz Sharif.
I mean the reason is quite obvious India doesn't take them seriously, they openly hid bin laden and their army general called him a martyr. No negotiations with terrorists
Saying "Why don't they talk it out" is an absurd argument, we can say that "Why didn't the USSR and America talk it out during the cold war?" It's a matter of what we stand for and things we believe in, India wants to grow and become a great nation while improving the lives of its citizens, while Pakistan wants to destroy india and its generals want to make money at the expense of a common Pakistani.
As an American, I never understood why we supported Pakistan over India. One is a democracy, the other is not. One has economic potential, the other does not. One spreads or at least harbors terrorists, the other does not. Why has it taken so long to seek closer ties to India? The Cold War ended 30 years ago.
India is going to be a great threat. Plus the way America works is you support weaker smaller nations that will depend on America and will allow Americans on their soil in return of keeping potential enemies weak.
Pakistan was developing a lot better than India during the early years. South Korea used Pakistan as an economic model. Secondly, Pakistan was a hedge against India, who was aligned with the Soviet Union. Thirdly, we defeated the Soviets with American support in Afghanistan. Fourthly, we helped the U.S. in Afghanistan. In return, we got economically blackmailed, militarily cutoff, and millions of refugees. There's a reason Pakistan is poor and America is not. One is dumb and the other smart.
for starters Modi was banned from the US until not long ago for doing nothing or even embraced Riots in his own state, but I guess u guys are Okay with Mr Bonesaw u are okay with Hindu extremists that Literally model themselves after Nazis.
America want client states, and can never tolerate other powerful country or stable ally, This is how america goverment works, no faults of normal americans, but this is what america is
Bcz pakistan is a goldmine for usa. USA can easily use it as a proxy to do their dirty work. Unlike India where USA would find it difficult to do the same. Plus it had land border with iran and Afghanistan.
@@Pinicle_of_evolution They have no future like that. They have barely any resources, the terrain makes the level for economies of scale much higher and the will eventually be assimilated by both India and China.
@@comradeofthebalance3147 They will have a pretty good future, they have the rivers. China didn't invaded them because "ancient Chin" but because all thier major rivers on which the mainland chinese the Han Chinese population depend originate in Tibet that was the reason not some greater china bs. Bhutan is doing pretty fine, Tibet will be the same if not better
This is one of the few times when it feels like this channel totally glossed over the brutal violence of post-independence partition of the subcontinent. Ethnic and religious tensions may have built up over time, but the bloodshed of partition also created a lot of bad feelings between the two countries for decades - hopefully having gradually faded by now.
As an Indian, I'm ashamed of the post-independence violence. There was no reason it needed to get as brutal as it ended up being. Hopefully India and Pakistan can be like how France and Germany are today.
@@shayk4791 Be ashamed all you want, it's a two way street and only India cares about minority rights. Pakistani Hindus fled or were genocided, Sikhs are gone, and Christians are literally being sold to China.
It's hard to imagine that happening hut I hope so. Worth bearing in mind what happened between France and Germany which led then to 'get serious' about being peaceful neighbours...
It would have faded, if Fundamentalist and Far-Right Political Parties and Organizations weren't allowed to flourish in both countries. They used the British 'Divide and Rule' model, to not only "remind" and keep fresh the scars of partition and religious conflicts but also, successfully take over the central governments of both Nations, through coups and terror in Pakistan and through elections and reactionary fervor in India, where the ruling Modi government holds an absolute majority, despite getting just 33% of the votes, quite reminiscent of Hitler's Slim majority election victory in 1933. The ruling Indian government not only made clear it's objective of turning India, non Secular, scrap large parts if our Democratic, Secular and Socialist Constitution, classify Muslims as second class citizens (along with other "belligerent" minorities, castes and even cultures) but even to Ban the English name of our country...India. But, If Democracy and the constitution outlives these troubled times, incumbency and a moderate, yet strong government may stitch the wounds laid bare within the Nation, in the long run. Rapprochement with Pakistan though.....involves another critical issue, that is, Pakistan...or more specifically, the Pakistani Military, whose sole purpose of existence is Kashmir and the issue is also the main revanchist source of it's Political Power and Military Funding. One that it's unlikely to let go of. Even if all these hurdles are surpassed, Kashmir is still destined to remain divided between Three Regional Super Powers in the foreseeable future, much like once Poland was.
@@TheDentedHelmet if you have to ban parties, it is not a true democracy, and the democracy you champion is a lie. Imagine you are playing chess against someone, and you win, and they say its dangerous that you won, and revoke your win and ban you from playing. Then was it really a game of chess or was it rigged from the start? A democracy without the people's choice, or with their choices taken away is not a democracy, it is a one-party state or dictatorship. Real democracy must have the ability to even vote itself out, otherwise it is no more legitimate than North Korea's government, or than Assads government, or pick any government people complain about
Instead of saying “India and Pakistan went to war three times”, I would rather you said “Pakistan initiated war with India three times”. That paints a totally different picture of who was the aggressor. Also they fought four times (1948, 1965, 1971, and 1999). In 1971, India had to interject itself because the East And West Pakistan strife was something they could or contain to their regions and it was making it unstable for India on both sides. Also, in pretty much all battles, India dominated Pak but agreed to a mediated compromise for the sake of peace.
@@cyberverse9141 A statement like that is silly as it is label-peddling. I don't even know your definition of Hindutva. Several people use it differently. Please back it up with any case you have to make for that. Back to this post, saying objectively who is the first-use aggressor vs "they fought two wars" paints a very different picture in people's minds.
@@manonnomission you watch too much bjp propaganda son. "All battles, India dominated pak" 😂 If that was true, Pakistan wouldn't exist today if India dominated all 4 wars. Pakistan kicked india's ass in 1965. 1947 war was started by dogras. In reality, India only dominated 1971 which was doomed to be a failure from the start. Massive exclaves that far apart never survive.
@@cyberverse9141 1948. India make Pak retract from Kashmir completely. But UN mediation created the false division into Kashmir. Stupid of Nehru. 1965. Pak provoked, as usual, needlessly. India fought back and defeated Pak and regained its territory. 1971. India got East Pak freed up and got a new country Bangladesh, and flew into Lahore (west side) and captured that too. But again gave Lahore away as part of UN / US intervention. 1999. Pak burst into Kargil. India handed its ass back to them. Again Bill Clinton intervened. If you have any other info, please post. All I see are just statements from you.
@@manonnomission 1947-48: Pakistan invaded Kashmir to stop the Dogra massacre and captured Gilgit-Baltistan, AJK. India defended Srinagar and didn't even attempt to take Gilgit-Baltistan, Ajk 😂 1965: originally limited to disputed territory but India launched surprise attack at main international border at the middle of night like cowards. Pakistan defeated India at the biggest battle since world War 2, Battle of Chawinda 🇵🇰 💪 1971: already said 1999: Pakistan gave it up voluntarily 2019: tea is fantastic 🍵 😂 🇵🇰
My takeaway from this video is Pakistan is not stable enough for peace, and even if they were, the battle lines have been drawn and the alliances have been made.
Bro why so hate we have didn't do nothing to you. Your religion doesn't tell you to have peace? Muslims are the most humble people in the world I have to idea why u all hate Pakistan?
@@Shaheena_Asgharyeah most peaceful...which says only Allah is real ..only muslims will go to heaven...killing non muslims is ok ... Kiddo ....you haven't seen the other side of islam yet...ask people who was under Muslim rule...😂😂 Noobie you are living in your lala land... grow up get a life
It's a morbid miracle that Pakistan is still around. With the (lack of) infrastructure, reliable institutions, political stability, and economic organization, I'm surprised to see it still somewhat holding itself together.
@user-mm7zi4ue7dIndia was called Golden Bird before Muslims came and destroyed temples, killed people, taxed Hindus, forcibly converted some people, did unnecessary bloodshed. India in 1000 CE had 28% of world GDP and in 1 CE had 30% of world GDP. Go spread your propoganda somewhere else.
Shame that polish people had to suffer of hunger ,cast system,Sati rituals,diseases,laprosy,Colera since stone ages, FACT is there was no India before British colonisation,and it is British that cam to 100s rival states land who were fighting as deadly enemies,just l8ke Infia &Pakistan,As British came millions of low cast Hindus and poor,hungry,hungry people joined British army snd they faught in British army and just given ghem good and freedom,as with these margenusec people,British defeated all states run by Braman thugs,and slowly state by state,British won,and united in good eill this India,gave then job,food,and respect first time,to be equal to brahmans,who treated harijan as slaves since stone age,and now are still rebelling against ban to change the religion,,British were a greater blessing billions of Indian,who produced children like rabbits,20 children,as they no thing to do better,and it still continues,India may now talk bad about British,but India remember British gave them peace and justice,and medical school,and modern education,and since India gor fake freedom,Ghere is tremendous hate between majority Hindus and minority,India Hindus wanted Muslims and Christians,Siks parties,Harijan to leave the country,But it is Due to lack od leadership of these minorities,who did not know the hate of Hindus,will turn then as victims of Majority agresive Hindus,and these minority did prepare a leader to carve a land from British India,and now are suffering under agressive Braman Hindus.As British too,to keep idia united But hate Hindus and revenge forced British to carve a land for muslims,But sadly there should have seprate land for Christians,Sikhs,Harijans,And other minorities due to dangerous agresive Hindu,who killed Mahatma Gandhi,as now Killer of Mahatma Gandhi is considered as hero of Hindu India,and many minorities feel threatened by India becoming a Hindu Nation,and minorities having no land,and wants to to share a land for Sikhs Harijan,Budists,Jaina,Punjabi siks And Infia police is succeeded in doing target killing I'm all state who wish to be free,and many massacres in kashmir,Manipur,Nagaland, Assam ,Punjab,Tamil Nadu,, That is reason,that For 75 years Brutal accupation of India has produced no result to win the hearts of Kashmir.and Kashmiris under Indian brutal accupation,will never accept Indisn nationality,and will never recomond People of Oakistani ,Chinise Kadhmiris to join Indian accupetion for suicide with indian accupied Kashmir. The fact is Imdia Hindus were living under slavery of cast system,and in 100s of rival states,as bitter enemies,One should Read Hindu history. As now Idia is getting out of control,agressive,mischievious,They are white washing ,unknown history that Hindus were accupying Brittain in stone ages,and they gave British sll the know how and technologies,to colonis who whole world,And strange history since India is under Hindu fanatic,tee seller Modi,who has made India a undemocratic Country.and millions Indian have enough of this India and are doing every to escape this over populated India where people have no water to clean themselves,no toilets,no hygiene,but slavery of cast system,snd million have plans to leave India to all western countries,Espatially To Smeruca,Canada,Australia,Euroupe,Britain,And find great jobs,change thier religions ,and eat cows meat,,these Indian long to enter a country where they cows meat eating culture,as gor Induan nothing is tastier as eating cows,And yern to immigrate to Ameria,Canada,and now never to return yo polerised Indua,and Indian govet is busy to target killing India in America and Canada,&else else where,where turn against Hindu Infia to demand Peace of land for all the minorities,as result of making India a Hindu state,, It is Modi s madness to creat a new challenges gor peaceful workd that Infia is getting mischievious and agressive at every level,and looking for trouble at ever stage.
Did Russian freed you from horrors and suffering of cast system,Do polish still have dalits,harijan,untouchable,slave,In India in 100s brutal state,it was British that try ti free Hindus from Sati and all the hours,till Nritish csme,million og Hindu Muslims,Sikhs joined British army,to defeat,all other states and ruler thugs,to unite All those suffering palaces,and called It India.May be Now polish deserve to adapt cast system.
The question is, that most don't understand the cause was never about Kashmir, it was always about Pakistani army controlling Pakistan and its people. The British colonial army in India was used to controlling people and resources, when British left the officers in these army where mostly from frontier states which we today know as Pakistan. These officers didn't understand or accept democracy and always wanted a control over the state. They understood Kashmir would be the bone of contention between India and Pakistan and it will be the reason for strong army and control over Pakistan's administration, so they send their soldiers in disguise with few local militia to Kashmir and attacked the Princely state of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947-48. There by starting to have their say in Pakistani political administration. Hence you don't see any democratic govt succeeding in Pakistan since the beginning. Jinna was powerless by the end of his life Liyaqat ali was killed mysteriously. The party Muslim League was ended just within few years of Pakistan's independence. Fatima Jinna was house arrested till her end, Mujib even after winning the election was never handed over the power. If anyone tries to see the history of Pakistan, all the govt Pakistan has had was either supported by the army or was army dictatorship. Even today Pakistan army removed Imran khan the moment he tried to make democracy stronger and away from armys control. Same thing happened in past with Bhutto and Nawaz. Kashmir problem is just to blind side the real thing, which is power control over Pakistan's administration by Pakistani army.
It’s crazy to think that the British of the past were so ingenious in their grand strategy plans. It almost feels like the world was a stage they were setting up to be advantageous to them as possible. I always figured the poor outcomes of their border drawing were a kind of archaic incompetence, like they didn’t know any better. I wonder how much of it was truly calculated.
The British usually had to leave fairly established colonies quickly for no other reason than self-decolonization. It was fine when the British had the power to keep regional peace, but they knew political vacuums would occur when they left. Many of the areas they left were not ‘countries’ but regions, often with historically nomadic groups or those with religious minorities. They had to draw lines somewhere, and often to avoid confrontation.
Playing local powers against one another is a tool of empires that is almost as old as the concept of empire. Drawing borders that spawn conflict is a really easy way to accomplish that, a bad border keeps people embroiled in conflict long past independence, what better way to make sure they never grow strong enough to become a threat? All the better that drawing borders is difficult to do well and easy to do poorly, that it might later be attributed to incompetence. There may be no way to prove it one way or the other, but incompetent people don't end up conquering 1/3rd of the planet. They knew what they were doing.
@@Hilts931 If splitting it into two countries was supposed to stop them from kicking the shit out of each other, then it failed spectacularly. Now I can't say for sure that things would have been better if India wasn't split, but I can say that it's hard to do much worse than two countries pointing nukes at each other and itching to push the button.
All of the very good geopolitics and economic youtube channels. Good times bad times, RealLifelore, Wendover production, visualpoltiks, peter Zeihan, Caspian report, economic explained, TLDR.
@@Shaheena_Asgharalready made indian side kashmir a proper part of india In from of you and your chuslim community... You are still in your dreams... Wake up and smell the coffee piglet
You didn't mention the brutal Genocide of minority Kashmiri Hindus post 1990,that let to their exodos from Kashmir .Men were peeled alive,women raped & cut to pieces when alive. Not mentioning is supporting it. And USA knew it all along. Perhaps you don't have knowledge 20:56
@@TruthSeeker8834 What you smoking lol, there will be no peace until the entire Indian subcontinent, including all of Kashmir, India, Pakistani Punjab, Sindh, Nepal, East Bengal come under one rule. If you look at the bigger picture, its all a massive civil war between culturally Indian states. Kashmir has always been part of the Indian realm, most of its wars and trade was with Punjab, other than the Silk road. Independent Kashmir would become the poorest country in Asia, like Nepal today.
@@xijinpig8982 I'm smoking nothing and u r clearly smoking the poisonous nationalism. I agree that in the 1st place subcontinent shouldn’t be divided but we have already way past that. Currently Pakistan is a failed state, India on it’s way to extreme hinduism, Bangladesh is heavily corrupted and underdeveloped and so on. So Forming something like European Union or a State having full autonomy would be better than the current self. They would be under India but each state will have greater autonomy to govern.
@@TruthSeeker8834😂😂Get the Heck out of Here,And US and Russia should Also Make Alaska a Neutral Country, China and India are Rising Global Superpowers
@@TruthSeeker8834If India on it's way to "Hindu Extremism",Then How Is INDIA TODAY WORLD'S FASTEST GROWING AMD INDUSTRIALISING TECH POWER AS reported by UM,IMF,World Bank etc and Under Modi Govt Highly Successful Startup India initiative,India Saw the Rise of 95,000+ Startups in just 6 years(2nd highest on Earth) and Atleast 2000 are run by Muslim Entrepreneurs, That's just Intro, According to UN, India's Poverty declined by 130 Million People under Modi,And 30% of those ppl who came out pf Poverty were Muslims and No PM did more to Muslims than PM Modi, According to FACTUAL DATA, 30%+ Benefits of PM Awas Yojana(Free Housing Scheme), Mudra Loan Seekers, Skilling Unempolyed Young were all Granted to Muslims, And More Reservations For Muslim Women At in Central Jobs, Removing Discriminatory Policies against Muslim Women like Triple Ta*aq, And Now After Modi's Pro Market Policies were Enacted, Many Entrepreneurs From Muslim Community became Founders of Start-ups and Unicorns and Are now Becoming Millionaires and Billionaires
Air Commodore Władysław Józef MarianTurowicz was the administrator of Pakistan's Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO) from 1967 to 1970. He was one of forty five Polish officers and airmen who joined RPAF on contract in the early fifties. After completion of his initial contract, Turowicz opted to stay on in Pakistan and continued to serve in PAF and later, SUPARCO. Turowicz made significant contributions to Pakistan's missile/rocket program as a chief aeronautical engineer. In Pakistan, he remains highly respected as a scientist and noted aeronautical engineer. Just some more history lesson thoughts it will be interesting
If I'm not wrong the Muslim league started in Dhaka, present day Bangladesh and Jinnah converted to Islam from another religion , who led the Muslims .
Yes, because the partition was supposed to be on religious lines. The same can be said for Janugadh and Hyderabad that were invaded and annexed by the indian army.
@@Asfandyar_ So, would you be okay if 200 million indian Muslims move to pakistan? Because they were supposed to move but they didn't. Since we keep the population we also keep the land, simple as that.
One thing that you ignored and many others do as well is the Dogra riots. Hundreds of muslims being killed was the reason Pakistani tribals attacked Kashmir. Now before nationalists start barking at me, I am not supporting or justfying anything, just stating that the Pakistanis didn't attack for no reason at all.
i think most of the conflicts of the past 80 years have just been put on a holding pattern. we haven't ended any of them because of the mild way we fight wars.....that will change soon....all at once
That's an very interesting theory. May I'll add my theory that human relationship tenses so hard over years that it will result in a great war every few decades
@@007kingifrit Most of them. Very few have been long term. Some areas sprout back up in violence again, but most wars end. Korea is the only one I can think of that didn’t. But the Cold War. Gulf War. 2 Afghan wars. Haiti, Grenada, Somalia interventions. East Timor Crisis. Arab Israeli wars. India Pakistan wars. And yes, while there are still occasionally some flare ups in Israel, or on the India Pakistan border, there’s nothing like the wars of the 1900s. Vietnam war: completely over. I mean, we’re considering being allies now after that most recent visit. No way you can claim that Vietnam wasn’t “really ended” right? We helped force British, French, and Israeli troops out of Egypt during the Suez Crisis. Ended many colonial wars through pressure on European powers (not all who listened), but the US definitely put on that pressure to end colonialism since WW2. And 99% of those colonial conflicts have ended since WW2. I really don’t know what you mean. The only reason to think that most conflicts have remained ongoing is if your only knowledge of modern conflicts stems from current events, where you only know the big ones that are still going on, and forgot about all the hundreds of conflicts that started and ended since WW2.
Some inaccuracies in the video: India conducted its first nuclear tests in 1974 Liaquat Ali Khan was the first PM of Pakistan while QuiadeAzam MA Jinnah was First Governer general
Kashmir Might be muslim Majority but We should not forget there are sizeable non religious Nomads which are included in HIndus and Muslims as the states prefer, Even the muslims mostly of different sects than that of Majority of Pakistan so, both the states have a fear to lose it which is not theirs.
kashmir belongs to Pakistan bcz hyderabad and junagadh leaders wanted to join pakistan but bcz of their majority hindu population they were forced to join india.
There are two major factors that mess a nation, one being religious fundamentalism like Sharia laws for Islamic nations and the other being Communism-Socialism, the former being obsolete in the modern political world and the later though a product of the modern industrial world is a stupid quasi religious utopianist daydream not grounded in reality, given Pakistan was not swimming in oil but still enacted Sharia made them fail in the end while India doing the Socialism thing messed it in its infancy.
Pakistan still has British era common law......dont know if u even know what sharia law is to see it implemented..... Only a few family and criminal laws are sharia based which is only 10% .. And u forget Pakistan was way ahead of India in industrial development and GDP till 1990 atleast..... India only took off after 1990
Pakistan was ahead of India in all matters till at least the 1970s and Pakistan isn't a Shariah Law country and never was. Some civil matters are dealt with Shariah and that too are purely based on Choice rest all are by Penal Code
Stop making india pakistan videos .. we are not the same .. one of us it trying to get a flag to the moon and other one has a moon on their flag ... no issues just stop putting us on a single balance to weigh ..
@dieswin_😂😂po*r paxtan has a flaaag on the moon😂😂,Did u study in madrassa 😂😂,And According to UN Sanitation Report of 2019, India's Toilet Access grew to 96% of Population,While Paxtani is at only 81%😂😂,Po*r Paxtani International beggars, While India Continues to BOOM ECONOMICALLY, TECHNOLOGICALLY, DIPLOMATICALLY AND MILITARILY
@dieswin_😂😂po*r paxtan has a flaaag on the moon😂😂,Did u study in madrassa 😂😂,And According to UN Sanitation Report of 2019, India's Toilet Access grew to 96% of Population,While Paxtani is at only 81%😂😂,Po*r Paxtani International beggars, While India Continues to BOOM ECONOMICALLY, TECHNOLOGICALLY, DIPLOMATICALLY AND MILITARILY
@dieswin_😂😂po*r paxtan has a flaaag on the moon😂😂,Did u study in madrassa 😂😂,And According to UN Sanitation Report of 2019, India's Toilet Access grew to 96% of Population,While Paxtani is at only 81%😂😂,Po*r Paxtani International beggars, While India Continues to BOOM ECONOMICALLY, TECHNOLOGICALLY, DIPLOMATICALLY AND MILITARILY
Sir,a very balanced and true analysis,and yet Kashmir issue can not go away .Pakistan is a predator country based on its founder's ideology and will continue till it runs out of all foreign beneficiaries. One of its PM has set a time limit of 1000 years and as of now it is less than 100 years. So just keep watching!
Kashmir issue can go away if Indian occupied army get out of Kashmir. Founding Father of Pakistan,ideology was better than any Indian Leader for the last 75yrs years Independent history of the two countries.
0:13: 🌍 The rivalry between India and Pakistan, both nuclear powers with a combined population of 1.5 billion, poses a high risk of nuclear war and has significant global implications. 4:18: 🔑 Kashmir, a Muslim majority state with a Hindu ruler, was strategically located and desired by India, Pakistan, and China. 8:24: 🔥 India and Pakistan have fought multiple wars over the disputed region of Kashmir, with the conflict starting in 1948 and continuing into the 1970s. 12:40: 🇮🇳🇵🇰 The video discusses the differences between India and Pakistan in terms of their political systems, military influence, and lack of political continuity. 16:58: 💰 India's vibrant startup ecosystem, established pharmaceutical and IT industry, and growing manufacturing sector position it for a better economic future than Pakistan. Recap by Tammy AI
Neither the British Raj officials (Mountbatten, et al.) nor Gandhi and the INC desired partition, that much is clear from primary sources of their discussions. The problem was the Muslim League and Jinnah's change of heart against unity in 1940. It is telling that Pakistan means "Land of the Pure", implying 'others' i.e. non-Muslims and outsiders are filthy and impure. The very concept is a terrible foundation on which to build a viable modern nation. Today we have we have a perpetually failing sharia military-run state funded by Saudi Arabia + China and punctual bailouts from the international community just to avoid complete chaos spilling over, and a rising toxic nationalism in India with Modi and BJP. Partition was probably the greatest human tragedy of the 20th century. Trivia: Jinnah kept the tuberculosis and lung cancer that were killing him a secret and pushed through negotiations. Had anyone outside his closed circle known they could have stalled talks until his death, derail them, and keep the Indian subcontinent united. Muslims and Hindus (and others!) would have been stronger together as one India
Not true In this case Bharatis(endian) have no space to lie First it was Partition of Punjab Which happened on the votes in Punjab legeslative assembly where Muslim leauge and Congress was not even mattered It was minority sikh/Hindu Punjabis demanded partition of Punjab
Agreements are always stipulated by human error. Look at most borders in the world. Drawn by British or French, with no knowledge of the people. Disband these borders. You're actually brothers and sisters.
And? India ignored agreements by supporting Tamil Tigers and how they have treated ethnic/religious minorities within their own country and agreements with the USA/Canada on not killing citizens of foreign nations. They have broken multiple agreements like so many other nations, agreement doesn’t mean much sadly
@@raquetdude Yes, they do. Borders are drown and have to be respected. And you can always find imperfections in any country's policies to justify invasion. That's how Indian territories, that are now Pakistan were invaded and islamized in the first place, some Indian pirates attacked some muslim ship and it was used as a justification to invade Indian land, even if India didn't have a fleet and didn't control it's waters at the time.
8:59 you need to correct your information India attacked lahore our city in 1965 in night cowardly and then what Pakistan did with them you can search,go search find out then again edit your video and uplaod again..before making a channel like this come with 100% preparation man..see you next time
India first tested nuclear bomb in 1974. Please correct yourself .Then India tested five more nuclear tests in 1998 that were retaliated by Pakistan by testing six nuclear bombs thereafter in 1998
I totally agree with the conclusion of the video .... why not Pakistan and India can make bilateral relations between each other when There are many commonalities between the two.. ethnic, regional, cultural. Even religion when it comes to morality .. it's simply needed to dive deep in. And yes in the present setting the stakes are high and there are many new dimensions than in the past.... but then again the will is all that matters.. We the people also must do something about it.. Taking the example of the European union... European countries in the early modern period fought wars and wanted individual hegemony over all Europe. They were brutal rivals of each other.. but even they came to the point where they made a Union .. .. why not Pakistan and India . I believe we can. ❤ By the way.. thank you so much for the video.. it was good with balanced analysis 🙂.
What commonalities? The only people in entire gangadesh aka fake India who are related to Pakistanis are indian panjabis who barely make up 2% of India's whole population if any muhajir has warm feelings for the dindus, they can just go back to Uttar Pradesh Delhi or whatever sh t hole they crawled out of and see how the dindus treat em
Kashmir's population is overwhelmingly Muslim and hostile to Indian rule, and it would still be like that even if every Kashmiri Pandit returned. That's why India never let the Kashmiri people vote on their own destiny. India has to use its military not only to fight Pakistan, but to keep the people of Kashmir subjugated.
Oh really, what do you happened until 2019. It was a state and it had voting system. But government there was corrupt. It had no development for 70 years and people were resorting to stoning and joining terrorist groups. Now, atleast some jobs has been created and massive infrastructure has been pushed in Srinagar and surrounding area. Even people being interviewed are happy. Army are now mostly in border areas. Go check out photos and stop your propoganda.
If there was formal application by legitimate Kashmir authorities to join India then Kashmir belongs to India. Then there is the will of the people. Will they be ever allowed to vote so as to provide self determination?
The thing is, Junagadh was a Hindu Majority region which exceeded to Pakistan bcz it had a hindu ruler, but India didn't except this and invaded the state even before Pakistan could send troops. But when Kashmir with a Muslim majority exceeded to India by its Hindu ruler and Pakistan reacted by invading it, it wasn't accepted by India. Isn't that hypocrisy
@@simulify8726 Yes thats right. Whatever the reasons were of their will to cede to Pakistan doesn't matter. what matters is thay they willed to cede to Pakistan. As for demographic change, Sindh and Punjab were also Hindu majority way before partition. But alongside Kashmir, they also changed to majority Muslim due to conversion. So since there is no objection on Punjab and Sindh being part of Pak bcz they used to be hindu majority, there shall be no such objection on Kashmir either
For your information, not all Pakistanis and Indians are same. The Indian race is present in East Pakistan, which are nationalities such as Punjabi and Sindhi. As for West Pakistan, the majority of Baloch and Pashtuns live there, and they are ethnicities from an Iranian family, such as Persian and Kurdish. The Pashtuns are Afghans divided between Afghanistan and Pakistan. As for the Baloch, they live in Balochistan, which is divided between Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. They are like Kurds, and the closest nationality to them linguistically is Kurds, but culturally, they live like Gulf Bedouins and are present in the Gulf as well.
India itself is much more diverse. Punjabis and Sindhis are very small minorities in India. Baloch trace their lineage to Syria. Pashtuns are ban i isrrail their tribe names match with isrrail ten tribe names. afgan was grandson of saul. Locals could not pronounce Cohen so it became Khan. No Zoroastrian artifacts found in Pakistan while Buddhist artifacts found in Pakistan. Balochistan was a major part of Indus valley civilization
@@muslim_first Indo-Aryans were white people related to Europeans. When they invaded south asia they mixed with local dravidian population. Sindhi, Punjabis, Hindis, Bengalis don't look anything like original aryans. Only Dardic people are last pure Indo-Aryans
@@cyberverse9141 Kashmir Gilgit Baltistan north Balochistan KPK are cold snow mountains Punjab Sindh South Balochistan strong sun warm climate. Punjabis are very diverse. Punjabis in North Punjab Pakistan and locals of Azad Kashmir are close to same. Many Kashmiris are living in Punjab for centuries because of close proximity and search for agriculture rich land. They have embraced Punjab Allama Iqbal was Kashmiri from Sialkot. Punjabi Pakistanis and Kashmiris live together like Hindkowaan and Pakhtuns in KPK and Baloch and Sindhis in Sindh as half of Baloch tribes live in Sindh the city with most pashtuns is Karachi in Sindh. In Pakistan we are connected in every province
do you represent 100% of kashmiri's ? I know many people who openly posted through youtube videos that they want to remain in india and never in pakistan. So what you will say about it. how can you force your will on them ?
Poland doesn't allow a single Muslim migrant in,and u saying Pakistan,India are the same. Wow,Records of Hypocrisy broken. I understand u can't digest India's rise,post colonial suppression. I inform u with a heavy heart,India is unstoppable.Sorry for you. Btw,pls add a video on allowing Muslim migration to Poland I assure u,they can learn Polish and then,u all will be the same too..same culture u, know.
Pakistan economy and political stability is doomed by their rich Pak Army generals. Being an India I always support that we should remain neutral with Pakistan. There is no requirement of any kind of relationship with an unstable country like Pakistan. We should focus on our development and our progress. Pakistan is not our head ache hence we should keep our border closed and protected and ignore them.
This is a very emotive topic.... but the facts are clear while India rises Pakistan falls... each had 75 years to be peaceful and create a good society. India is trying whilst Pakistan wants to be this noisy neighbour... keeping Kashmir issue alive for Pakistan meeams the military controls the agenda ... I think China also want this region to be in a mess
You fail to mention that india is just hindu majority but secular and Pakistan isn't just Muslim majority but an islamic state , the first of its kind in the world
The country was founded for this religion, whose overwhelming majority adheres to this religion, the country that funds terrorism of this religion, the country (and people) that put religion over kinship (essentially saying that it doesn't matter that Indians are their blood-relatives), the country whose laws are based off of this religion. Introduction to Pakistan. @@manideep82
India has good relation with almost entire middle east, including major nation like saudi and UAE. Even Bangladesh which used to be a part of pakistan has fairly good relation with us and they are too muslim majority. So just saying the conflict is just bcz of religion just shows your ignorance.
@@SujalRajput10 That because those Middle Eastern countries are completely different countries to begin with. Say what you want but half the time the conflicts that happen between IN and PK is fundamentally connected with the differences of religion. I'm in no way saying which religion is better or worse. I'm saying the differences in religion has always been one of the fundamental within the same society that causes conflict.
One important point: When Pakistan attacked Kashmir to take it over, Kashmir wasn't a part of India. Therefore, India's intervention would have been a violation of international law, because technically the invaders weren't Pakistani army but tribal proxies acting on behalf of Pakistani army. This made it conditional that Kashmir become a part of India so that this attack might be treated as an internal disturbance of India and dealt with accordingly. It became a full fledged war later is another story.
Switzerland have Swiss and Kashmir have some one else . That's a costly deal to keep them independent for Westerners. It will end up another Afghanistan. For us, current scenario is best
Seems the script of the video was taken out from an British schoolbook words like " predominantly hindu and predominantly minority "these words are used by Britishers to mimic this conflict unavoidable even though it was created by the British themselves since: muslim league party is established and maintained by British government from the beginning
In your description it makes this clear that logically bharati administered Kashmir should be part of Pakistan. It is kind of like Russian occupying parts of western Ukraine. Eastern Ukrainian still had a lot of ethnic Russians so it make bharat double wrong.
What he meant was, Kashmir was predominantly Muslim with hindu leader while junagadh was predominantly hindu with Muslim leader. Now junagadh is in India but Kashmir isn't in Pakistan.
@@wazukyan7696 I agree, If there had been a referendum that is probably what would have happened. But Pak decided to Invade J&K which then lead to Hari Singh requesting India to intervene and the rest is history.
@@harlowida hyderabad was integral part of India. People wanted to join India. Nissan wanted independent nation. There was arm uprising against nizam by communist peasants. Indian government also didn't want to divide North and south. Nehru was out of India and sardar vaallabhai Patel aa acting prime minister decided to invade India. It was best decision. As a hyderabadi, I am proud of India first. Everyone here also will say the same thing.
What are you saying ?dont bring your half cooked brain, India whoul have never needed to rule on kashmir(a hindu rular country), if pakistan hadn't attacked kashmir. The attack by pakistan triggred, king of kashmir to succeed into India. Keep this in mind next time
It is so weird to me that in our modern world, two countries that have so much in common can be so fiercely divided, seemingly solely on the basis of different religions. I don't get it. Like 99% of things can be in common, but they will fight tooth and nail over that 1% difference? Bizarre.
Britishers were too successful in divide and conquer. Indians too deceitful. Pakistan too moronic. UN too useless. Pakistan should have told the UN to fuck off and taken Srinigar. Everything would have ended. After all, India annexed significantly more territory than the whole of Kashmir combined.
@@winstonmaraj8029 Korea and Germany had divisions placed upon them by external forces. Pakistan itself was the subject of my original post, so I don't think that requires much explanation. I think the only other place where minor divisions create such intense divisions is both the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa. Both being more or less the starting point for humanity has given both regions plenty of time to develop ethnic divisions, and Islam's fractious nature just pours gasoline on that already burning fire.
@@daniell1483clearly you have no knowledge about India's vast diversity. Every state of India have different tradition, culture and language. You can say 30% common with Pakistan mainly from North-west part of India. I am from east part of India and we have no similarity with Pakistan even our languages are totally different.
27th February 2019, india did a huge drama of Air-strike in Pakistan and next morning Pakistan Airforce teached them lesson destroyed 2 jets captured their 1 pilot "Abhinandan" and Indian air force attacked their own helicopter and killed army personal oh man who will mention all this ?😂
There is a general perception that Bengali was refused as an official language, it's wrong. It has been widely reported even by historians, but facts speak otherwise, and I'm shocked why no-one has challenged such a childish lie. Before 1971, Pakistan had 3 constitutions, first in 1954, which was completed but not implemented largely due to the difference in power ratio between the prime minister and president. Second constitution, and the first to be approved was in 1956. The third I believe was in 1961, under military rule, it was also approved. Each one of those constitutions declare Urdu and Bengali to be official languages of Pakistan, equally. It's baffling that why this language lie continues to persist. Each of those constitutions are public documents, it's really shocking.
🟢 Try Speakly with first 7 days for free and get 60% discount on an annual subscription: speakly.app.link/goodtimesbadtimes
📌 Support GTBT on Patreon! www.patreon.com/GTBT
➡ Paypal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/GoodTimesBadTimes
Indians don't need to do anything. Pakistan will break into many pieces. some of which will be taken back by India. rest will be used as a buffer zone against Islamic Middle Eastern threats. Pakistan will not exist or it will be a landlocked state forever fighting 3 front war. We had 4 wars and countless terrorist attacks in India. why do you think India will & should start trade and resurrect Pakistan from its grave? Maybe you need to watch your own video again to understand the stakes.
Pakistanis & India same culture??They why doesn't your country invite a single Muslim immigrant??They can learn Polish and u folks can have the same culture right? Please make a video inviting them,put in your points lest u be a huge Hypocrite.
And we r "poor". Return the 45 + trillion dollars stolen from us in 200 yrs rule first.Thiefs r better quiet.
Btw u can join the graveyard next to u called Ukraine and create a new country names Grave-o-Polandaine. A new energetic vassal state of USA..🤣 Ur IQ permits only this
I mean the reason is quite obvious India doesn't take them seriously, they openly hid bin laden and their army general called him a martyr.
No negotiations with terrorists
India invaded illegally Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir against the wishes of Kashmiris and occupied it illegally and forcefully with 800000 terrorist Indian army which myrterd one lakh Kashmiris because kashmiris wanted there right of self-determination according to UN resolution. Illegally Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir is not a part of india it is a disputed territory according to UN resolution between Pakistan and terrorist India.
@@asifjaved1939 SHUT UP, Kashmir is my native place
I swear, between this channel, Peter Zeihan, Kings and Generals, and countless other military/history channels… I’ve managed to get a minor in History/Geopolitics education level on the subject. Great stuff here as always - love from America to our Polish brothers
I’m literally addicted to all of those channels/people 😂
Same here. I’ve found the subject so interesting and can’t stop watching it
I swear I I’ve learned more through UA-cam than all the years I spent at school more useful as well
@@someonejustsomeone1469 he hasn’t been uploading as much lately tho
@@Vulcanus3231 his videos are mostly quite good. Especially the make in India videos circa ~2016.
11:46 India's first nuclear test was in 1974 (Smiling Buddha). 1998 was the second nuclear test (Pokhran-II).
Also, i would like to mention that the civilian leadership on both sides have made attempts at improving ties but there would usually be a terror attack after a thaw in relations making any long term improvement in ties politically untenable.
If India and Pakistan were to normalise ties then the Pakistani army would lose it's primacy in domestic politics.
"Smiling Buddha"
I don't think the Buddha would be laughing
Yes but on the other end, whenever there was attempts at improving ties the Hindutvas in India would attack Muslims in an effort to start a conflict with pakistans co-religionists (I.e. gujarat riots, ayodhya in 1991 and varanasi in 2021) making any long term improvement in ties politically untenable.
If india and pakistan were to normalize ties then the Hindutvas movement (previously manifested as the RSS, currently manifested as the BJP and indias ruling Modi-regime) would lose its primacy in domestic politics.
@@markm5758 Abey oh jhaantu, gashti ki aulad. Halala k liye bhej de Apni ammi ko mere paas
@@Alex11V😂
@@markm5758proud islamic republic of Pakistan has problem with hindutva 😂😂😂
we know situation of ahmedia hazara pashtun baloch muhajir hindu shia sikhs in Pakistan
Pakistan should be last country to lecture india on human rights minorities and democracy
Thank you for pointing out that the primary reason for India not agreeing to peace talks is the political instability of Pakistan. Political commentators love to blame it on Indian populism or stubbornness. Even if that were to be true, there are always two ends of a rope.
Lol
@@asha8443lol noobie ...get a life...stop using indian names to hindu name to hide your chuslim identity
It is more than that... When we are having talks with pakistani leadership... Their military will go on an adventure without even telling their PM... This happened in 1999.... In last decade only... First military helped nawaz sharif become PM... Then they replaced nawaz with imran... Then they replaced imran with nawaz's brother.... Whom do you speak to.... Also Pakistan has unilatetally attacked us 5 times... They were defeated every time is another story.... But they are not a group of people whom you can talk to
We dont know whom we should talk to. General Bajwa, Imraan Khan or Shehbaz Sharif. If we look democratically than Imran Khan. If we look realistically than General Bajwa. If we just talk to the PM than Shehbaz Sharif.
I mean the reason is quite obvious India doesn't take them seriously, they openly hid bin laden and their army general called him a martyr.
No negotiations with terrorists
Saying "Why don't they talk it out" is an absurd argument, we can say that "Why didn't the USSR and America talk it out during the cold war?"
It's a matter of what we stand for and things we believe in, India wants to grow and become a great nation while improving the lives of its citizens, while Pakistan wants to destroy india and its generals want to make money at the expense of a common Pakistani.
You say this while India's global terror network has been exposed to the whole world
noice.
@@cowmata004 pagal wagal h kya be lwde??
@@cowmata004 We're that important that you had to make a fake account to do juvenile trolling. 😎
@@SPDRM He did that just for his domestic politics and that too, only after he was thrown out of power by the Pak army.
As an American, I never understood why we supported Pakistan over India. One is a democracy, the other is not. One has economic potential, the other does not. One spreads or at least harbors terrorists, the other does not.
Why has it taken so long to seek closer ties to India? The Cold War ended 30 years ago.
India is going to be a great threat. Plus the way America works is you support weaker smaller nations that will depend on America and will allow Americans on their soil in return of keeping potential enemies weak.
Pakistan was developing a lot better than India during the early years. South Korea used Pakistan as an economic model. Secondly, Pakistan was a hedge against India, who was aligned with the Soviet Union. Thirdly, we defeated the Soviets with American support in Afghanistan. Fourthly, we helped the U.S. in Afghanistan.
In return, we got economically blackmailed, militarily cutoff, and millions of refugees. There's a reason Pakistan is poor and America is not. One is dumb and the other smart.
for starters Modi was banned from the US until not long ago for doing nothing or even embraced Riots in his own state, but I guess u guys are Okay with Mr Bonesaw u are okay with Hindu extremists that Literally model themselves after Nazis.
America want client states, and can never tolerate other powerful country or stable ally,
This is how america goverment works, no faults of normal americans, but this is what america is
Bcz pakistan is a goldmine for usa. USA can easily use it as a proxy to do their dirty work.
Unlike India where USA would find it difficult to do the same. Plus it had land border with iran and Afghanistan.
4:32 Jammu & Kashmir did not border China in 1947, it bordered Tibet
Tibétain independence was not recognised even by the ROC at the time
@@cowmata004 Hii Porki. How old was Aisha when prophet Muhammad married her ? 😂 Go home Porki
@@comradeofthebalance3147doesn't matter what the ROC thought or the CCP thinks Tibet will be free in the next 5 decades
@@Pinicle_of_evolution They have no future like that. They have barely any resources, the terrain makes the level for economies of scale much higher and the will eventually be assimilated by both India and China.
@@comradeofthebalance3147 They will have a pretty good future, they have the rivers. China didn't invaded them because "ancient Chin" but because all thier major rivers on which the mainland chinese the Han Chinese population depend originate in Tibet that was the reason not some greater china bs. Bhutan is doing pretty fine, Tibet will be the same if not better
This is one of the few times when it feels like this channel totally glossed over the brutal violence of post-independence partition of the subcontinent. Ethnic and religious tensions may have built up over time, but the bloodshed of partition also created a lot of bad feelings between the two countries for decades - hopefully having gradually faded by now.
As an Indian, I'm ashamed of the post-independence violence. There was no reason it needed to get as brutal as it ended up being. Hopefully India and Pakistan can be like how France and Germany are today.
@@shayk4791 Be ashamed all you want, it's a two way street and only India cares about minority rights. Pakistani Hindus fled or were genocided, Sikhs are gone, and Christians are literally being sold to China.
It's hard to imagine that happening hut I hope so. Worth bearing in mind what happened between France and Germany which led then to 'get serious' about being peaceful neighbours...
It would have faded, if Fundamentalist and Far-Right Political Parties and Organizations weren't allowed to flourish in both countries. They used the British 'Divide and Rule' model, to not only "remind" and keep fresh the scars of partition and religious conflicts but also, successfully take over the central governments of both Nations, through coups and terror in Pakistan and through elections and reactionary fervor in India, where the ruling Modi government holds an absolute majority, despite getting just 33% of the votes, quite reminiscent of Hitler's Slim majority election victory in 1933.
The ruling Indian government not only made clear it's objective of turning India, non Secular, scrap large parts if our Democratic, Secular and Socialist Constitution, classify Muslims as second class citizens (along with other "belligerent" minorities, castes and even cultures) but even to Ban the English name of our country...India. But, If Democracy and the constitution outlives these troubled times, incumbency and a moderate, yet strong government may stitch the wounds laid bare within the Nation, in the long run.
Rapprochement with Pakistan though.....involves another critical issue, that is, Pakistan...or more specifically, the Pakistani Military, whose sole purpose of existence is Kashmir and the issue is also the main revanchist source of it's Political Power and Military Funding. One that it's unlikely to let go of.
Even if all these hurdles are surpassed, Kashmir is still destined to remain divided between Three Regional Super Powers in the foreseeable future, much like once Poland was.
@@TheDentedHelmet if you have to ban parties, it is not a true democracy, and the democracy you champion is a lie. Imagine you are playing chess against someone, and you win, and they say its dangerous that you won, and revoke your win and ban you from playing. Then was it really a game of chess or was it rigged from the start? A democracy without the people's choice, or with their choices taken away is not a democracy, it is a one-party state or dictatorship. Real democracy must have the ability to even vote itself out, otherwise it is no more legitimate than North Korea's government, or than Assads government, or pick any government people complain about
Instead of saying “India and Pakistan went to war three times”, I would rather you said “Pakistan initiated war with India three times”. That paints a totally different picture of who was the aggressor.
Also they fought four times (1948, 1965, 1971, and 1999). In 1971, India had to interject itself because the East And West Pakistan strife was something they could or contain to their regions and it was making it unstable for India on both sides.
Also, in pretty much all battles, India dominated Pak but agreed to a mediated compromise for the sake of peace.
Hindutva spotted
@@cyberverse9141 A statement like that is silly as it is label-peddling. I don't even know your definition of Hindutva. Several people use it differently. Please back it up with any case you have to make for that.
Back to this post, saying objectively who is the first-use aggressor vs "they fought two wars" paints a very different picture in people's minds.
@@manonnomission you watch too much bjp propaganda son.
"All battles, India dominated pak" 😂
If that was true, Pakistan wouldn't exist today if India dominated all 4 wars.
Pakistan kicked india's ass in 1965. 1947 war was started by dogras.
In reality, India only dominated 1971 which was doomed to be a failure from the start. Massive exclaves that far apart never survive.
@@cyberverse9141 1948. India make Pak retract from Kashmir completely. But UN mediation created the false division into Kashmir. Stupid of Nehru.
1965. Pak provoked, as usual, needlessly. India fought back and defeated Pak and regained its territory.
1971. India got East Pak freed up and got a new country Bangladesh, and flew into Lahore (west side) and captured that too. But again gave Lahore away as part of UN / US intervention.
1999. Pak burst into Kargil. India handed its ass back to them. Again Bill Clinton intervened.
If you have any other info, please post. All I see are just statements from you.
@@manonnomission
1947-48: Pakistan invaded Kashmir to stop the Dogra massacre and captured Gilgit-Baltistan, AJK. India defended Srinagar and didn't even attempt to take Gilgit-Baltistan, Ajk 😂
1965: originally limited to disputed territory but India launched surprise attack at main international border at the middle of night like cowards. Pakistan defeated India at the biggest battle since world War 2, Battle of Chawinda 🇵🇰 💪
1971: already said
1999: Pakistan gave it up voluntarily
2019: tea is fantastic 🍵 😂 🇵🇰
Every time Pakistan started war
Not Pakistani people but it's Army.Army controls Pakistan.They try to lure the population of Pakistan towards India.
GTBT team - well done! It was a pleasure :)
My takeaway from this video is Pakistan is not stable enough for peace, and even if they were, the battle lines have been drawn and the alliances have been made.
Pakistan would have collapsed few times by now if they were not usefull for others to keep india in check.
Their existence depend on india.
Bro why so hate we have didn't do nothing to you. Your religion doesn't tell you to have peace? Muslims are the most humble people in the world I have to idea why u all hate Pakistan?
@@Shaheena_Asghar if you don't know even now it's better for you to live in ignorance and be happy. Truth is too ugly.
@@Shaheena_Asgharyeah most peaceful...which says only Allah is real ..only muslims will go to heaven...killing non muslims is ok ...
Kiddo ....you haven't seen the other side of islam yet...ask people who was under Muslim rule...😂😂
Noobie you are living in your lala land... grow up get a life
@dieswin_ and do what with it? Take even more poor and radical muslim in india. No thank you.
Thanks as always, Hubert and Łukasz, and Shankar ❤
Siachen Glacier is completely under Indian control
🇨🇳 Actually.
@@Charlie-phlezkwhy? did some chinese princes lost path and crossed tibet and took a naked bath in siachin glacier ?
China controls Shaksgam valley( ceded by Pak in 1963) not Siachen
pakistani army : " never won war, never lost an election "
1965, 1948 Pakistan kicked india's ass 🇵🇰
@@cyberverse9141imf loan power?
@@kishor.k8092 madrasa means school in Arabic 😂 uneducated poojeet
@@kishor.k8092
English pls
@@cyberverse9141that's y India carved your country in two!
😅
It's a morbid miracle that Pakistan is still around. With the (lack of) infrastructure, reliable institutions, political stability, and economic organization, I'm surprised to see it still somewhat holding itself together.
Arabs always rescue them!!!!!!!
Read the book pakistan a hard country. It will explain a lot.
@user-mm7zi4ue7dIndia was called Golden Bird before Muslims came and destroyed temples, killed people, taxed Hindus, forcibly converted some people, did unnecessary bloodshed. India in 1000 CE had 28% of world GDP and in 1 CE had 30% of world GDP. Go spread your propoganda somewhere else.
@user-mm7zi4ue7dlmao bro stop the cap
Any country has nukes should be respected
Geography has also been detrimental to Pakistani development & security. Lack of secularism also doesn’t help.
Whatever islam touches turns to sh*t! So why tolerate this awful religion?
Everything boils down to geography.
@@hieronymusbutts7349Plus resources.
What does secularism have to do with anything
Pakistan is a secular state though. They definitely aren't Islamic.
Polish and Indians are like relatives,we share common ancestors, great job our polish brothers love you from India 🇮🇳
Shame that polish people had to suffer of hunger ,cast system,Sati rituals,diseases,laprosy,Colera since stone ages,
FACT is there was no India before British colonisation,and it is British that cam to 100s rival states land who were fighting as deadly enemies,just l8ke Infia &Pakistan,As British came millions of low cast Hindus and poor,hungry,hungry people joined British army snd they faught in British army and just given ghem good and freedom,as with these margenusec people,British defeated all states run by Braman thugs,and slowly state by state,British won,and united in good eill this India,gave then job,food,and respect first time,to be equal to brahmans,who treated harijan as slaves since stone age,and now are still rebelling against ban to change the religion,,British were a greater blessing billions of Indian,who produced children like rabbits,20 children,as they no thing to do better,and it still continues,India may now talk bad about British,but India remember British gave them peace and justice,and medical school,and modern education,and since India gor fake freedom,Ghere is tremendous hate between majority Hindus and minority,India Hindus wanted Muslims and Christians,Siks parties,Harijan to leave the country,But it is Due to lack od leadership of these minorities,who did not know the hate of Hindus,will turn then as victims of Majority agresive Hindus,and these minority did prepare a leader to carve a land from British India,and now are suffering under agressive Braman Hindus.As British too,to keep idia united But hate Hindus and revenge forced British to carve a land for muslims,But sadly there should have seprate land for Christians,Sikhs,Harijans,And other minorities due to dangerous agresive Hindu,who killed Mahatma Gandhi,as now Killer of Mahatma Gandhi is considered as hero of Hindu India,and many minorities feel threatened by India becoming a Hindu Nation,and minorities having no land,and wants to to share a land for Sikhs Harijan,Budists,Jaina,Punjabi siks And Infia police is succeeded in doing target killing I'm all state who wish to be free,and many massacres in kashmir,Manipur,Nagaland, Assam ,Punjab,Tamil Nadu,,
That is reason,that For 75 years Brutal accupation of India has produced no result to win the hearts of Kashmir.and Kashmiris under Indian brutal accupation,will never accept Indisn nationality,and will never recomond People of Oakistani ,Chinise Kadhmiris to join Indian accupetion for suicide with indian accupied Kashmir.
The fact is Imdia Hindus were living under slavery of cast system,and in 100s of rival states,as bitter enemies,One should Read Hindu history.
As now Idia is getting out of control,agressive,mischievious,They are white washing ,unknown history that Hindus were accupying Brittain in stone ages,and they gave British sll the know how and technologies,to colonis who whole world,And strange history since India is under Hindu fanatic,tee seller Modi,who has made India a undemocratic Country.and
millions Indian have enough of this India and are doing every to escape this over populated India where people have no water to clean themselves,no toilets,no hygiene,but slavery of cast system,snd million have plans to leave India to all western countries,Espatially To Smeruca,Canada,Australia,Euroupe,Britain,And find great jobs,change thier religions ,and eat cows meat,,these Indian long to enter a country where they cows meat eating culture,as gor Induan nothing is tastier as eating cows,And yern to immigrate to Ameria,Canada,and now never to return yo polerised Indua,and Indian govet is busy to target killing India in America and Canada,&else else where,where turn against Hindu Infia to demand Peace of land for all the minorities,as result of making India a Hindu state,,
It is Modi s madness to creat a new challenges gor peaceful workd that Infia is getting mischievious and agressive at every level,and looking for trouble at ever stage.
Common Ancestors? What
You talking about Aryan "Invasion" lol?
Common ancestors😂😂😂
Did Russian freed you from horrors and suffering of cast system,Do polish still have dalits,harijan,untouchable,slave,In India in 100s brutal state,it was British that try ti free Hindus from Sati and all the hours,till Nritish csme,million og Hindu Muslims,Sikhs joined British army,to defeat,all other states and ruler thugs,to unite All those suffering palaces,and called It India.May be Now polish deserve to adapt cast system.
@@frankschweizerfrankschweiz7133 calm your t!ts gorajeet
From Jammu Kashmir to Kanyakumari, From Gujarat to Arunachal Pradesh, From Lakshadweep to Andaman Nicobar... Our Great Bharatvarsh 🇮🇳🔥...
Jaana bihari
Kashmiris are pure aryans while you indians are black dravidians and wannabe aryans 😂😂😂
@@truthprevails8836patharbazz😂😂
@@andhbhaktaurmadrsowalokima1826 better to be a patharbazz than to be a rapist like u guys
@@truthprevails8836
If he is bihari what is wrong in that.
Racist Kashmiri.
I am also Kashmiri but hate Kashmiri people.
In Jammu Kashmir.... Hindu, Sikh and Buddhists also lived and live.
98% kasmeeris are muslim
The question is, that most don't understand the cause was never about Kashmir, it was always about Pakistani army controlling Pakistan and its people. The British colonial army in India was used to controlling people and resources, when British left the officers in these army where mostly from frontier states which we today know as Pakistan. These officers didn't understand or accept democracy and always wanted a control over the state. They understood Kashmir would be the bone of contention between India and Pakistan and it will be the reason for strong army and control over Pakistan's administration, so they send their soldiers in disguise with few local militia to Kashmir and attacked the Princely state of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947-48. There by starting to have their say in Pakistani political administration. Hence you don't see any democratic govt succeeding in Pakistan since the beginning. Jinna was powerless by the end of his life Liyaqat ali was killed mysteriously. The party Muslim League was ended just within few years of Pakistan's independence. Fatima Jinna was house arrested till her end, Mujib even after winning the election was never handed over the power. If anyone tries to see the history of Pakistan, all the govt Pakistan has had was either supported by the army or was army dictatorship. Even today Pakistan army removed Imran khan the moment he tried to make democracy stronger and away from armys control. Same thing happened in past with Bhutto and Nawaz. Kashmir problem is just to blind side the real thing, which is power control over Pakistan's administration by Pakistani army.
It’s crazy to think that the British of the past were so ingenious in their grand strategy plans. It almost feels like the world was a stage they were setting up to be advantageous to them as possible.
I always figured the poor outcomes of their border drawing were a kind of archaic incompetence, like they didn’t know any better.
I wonder how much of it was truly calculated.
The British usually had to leave fairly established colonies quickly for no other reason than self-decolonization. It was fine when the British had the power to keep regional peace, but they knew political vacuums would occur when they left. Many of the areas they left were not ‘countries’ but regions, often with historically nomadic groups or those with religious minorities. They had to draw lines somewhere, and often to avoid confrontation.
Playing local powers against one another is a tool of empires that is almost as old as the concept of empire. Drawing borders that spawn conflict is a really easy way to accomplish that, a bad border keeps people embroiled in conflict long past independence, what better way to make sure they never grow strong enough to become a threat? All the better that drawing borders is difficult to do well and easy to do poorly, that it might later be attributed to incompetence.
There may be no way to prove it one way or the other, but incompetent people don't end up conquering 1/3rd of the planet. They knew what they were doing.
@@advicepirate8673 or there’s two groups of people about to kick the shit out of each other and you won’t be there to stop them
@@Hilts931 If splitting it into two countries was supposed to stop them from kicking the shit out of each other, then it failed spectacularly.
Now I can't say for sure that things would have been better if India wasn't split, but I can say that it's hard to do much worse than two countries pointing nukes at each other and itching to push the button.
@@Nutella7721 they divided themselves between gods. That’s where the murder, rape and genocide came in.
All of the very good geopolitics and economic youtube channels. Good times bad times, RealLifelore, Wendover production, visualpoltiks, peter Zeihan, Caspian report, economic explained, TLDR.
They all have there own Bias though
@@lamchunting856There isn’t any source without a bias. That’s why you need multiple sources.
Literally my exact same geopolitics diet, we are in the same bubble
Very soon we'll begin reclaiming our land.
In ur dreams 😂😂😂😂
@@Shaheena_Asgharalready made indian side kashmir a proper part of india
In from of you and your chuslim community...
You are still in your dreams...
Wake up and smell the coffee piglet
@@Shaheena_Asghar It's happening as we speak.
yes possible in future
@@Shaheena_Asghar11:28 Aukaat dekhle khudki 😂
Surrender 😂
You didn't mention the brutal Genocide of minority Kashmiri Hindus post 1990,that let to their exodos from Kashmir .Men were peeled alive,women raped & cut to pieces when alive. Not mentioning is supporting it.
And USA knew it all along.
Perhaps you don't have knowledge 20:56
You watch too much hindutva propaganda. It was an exodus not genocide. The Jammu genocide of 600,000 kashmiri Muslims was very real
Another indian propaganda bot
Kashmir was and will always be the integral part of indian subcontinent 🇮🇳 🤝🇵🇱
I think India, Pakistan and China should free Kashmir and make it neutral country like Switzerland.
@@TruthSeeker8834
What you smoking lol, there will be no peace until the entire Indian subcontinent, including all of Kashmir, India, Pakistani Punjab, Sindh, Nepal, East Bengal come under one rule. If you look at the bigger picture, its all a massive civil war between culturally Indian states. Kashmir has always been part of the Indian realm, most of its wars and trade was with Punjab, other than the Silk road. Independent Kashmir would become the poorest country in Asia, like Nepal today.
@@xijinpig8982 I'm smoking nothing and u r clearly smoking the poisonous nationalism.
I agree that in the 1st place subcontinent shouldn’t be divided but we have already way past that. Currently Pakistan is a failed state, India on it’s way to extreme hinduism, Bangladesh is heavily corrupted and underdeveloped and so on.
So Forming something like European Union or a State having full autonomy would be better than the current self. They would be under India but each state will have greater autonomy to govern.
@@TruthSeeker8834😂😂Get the Heck out of Here,And US and Russia should Also Make Alaska a Neutral Country, China and India are Rising Global Superpowers
@@TruthSeeker8834If India on it's way to "Hindu Extremism",Then How Is INDIA TODAY WORLD'S FASTEST GROWING AMD INDUSTRIALISING TECH POWER AS reported by UM,IMF,World Bank etc and Under Modi Govt Highly Successful Startup India initiative,India Saw the Rise of 95,000+ Startups in just 6 years(2nd highest on Earth) and Atleast 2000 are run by Muslim Entrepreneurs, That's just Intro, According to UN, India's Poverty declined by 130 Million People under Modi,And 30% of those ppl who came out pf Poverty were Muslims and No PM did more to Muslims than PM Modi, According to FACTUAL DATA, 30%+ Benefits of PM Awas Yojana(Free Housing Scheme), Mudra Loan Seekers, Skilling Unempolyed Young were all Granted to Muslims, And More Reservations For Muslim Women At in Central Jobs, Removing Discriminatory Policies against Muslim Women like Triple Ta*aq, And Now After Modi's Pro Market Policies were Enacted, Many Entrepreneurs From Muslim Community became Founders of Start-ups and Unicorns and Are now Becoming Millionaires and Billionaires
Best geopolitical channel on UA-cam, well done
Air Commodore Władysław Józef MarianTurowicz was the administrator of Pakistan's Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO) from 1967 to 1970. He was one of forty five Polish officers and airmen who joined RPAF on contract in the early fifties. After completion of his initial contract, Turowicz opted to stay on in Pakistan and continued to serve in PAF and later, SUPARCO.
Turowicz made significant contributions to Pakistan's missile/rocket program as a chief aeronautical engineer. In Pakistan, he remains highly respected as a scientist and noted aeronautical engineer.
Just some more history lesson thoughts it will be interesting
For your kind information, he was Jewish..
@@bunty4u4ever27so? Jews aren't the problem, Zionists are
@@bunty4u4ever27 No, he was not.
If I'm not wrong the Muslim league started in Dhaka, present day Bangladesh and Jinnah converted to Islam from another religion , who led the Muslims .
You are wrong, jinnah was muslim from birth, it was his grand father who converted to avoid prosecutions by muslims
@@eee9034
Avoid persecution😅😂
Lindu stop this bs
@@FOREVERLOST-k1 can you bet your pe-nis for this ?
Careful ,we have proof,
you have to say goodbye to your mutilated mushroom
@@FOREVERLOST-k1explain jazia. You're welcome
@@FOREVERLOST-k1 ur own family converted for that very same reason
Love for India
From Pakistan occupied Sindhudesh
❤
broo you made my day 😂 love for sindh
Fake accounts
@@ninjaabcdehow do you know
@@praddumnvats6759 I didn't want you to find out like this. But I'm in a secret affair with your mother. She talks in her sleep.
The fight is not for kashmir, but for an islamic state. If kashmir was not a muslim majority, none of this would have happened.
Yes, because the partition was supposed to be on religious lines. The same can be said for Janugadh and Hyderabad that were invaded and annexed by the indian army.
@@Asfandyar_ So, would you be okay if 200 million indian Muslims move to pakistan? Because they were supposed to move but they didn't. Since we keep the population we also keep the land, simple as that.
One thing that you ignored and many others do as well is the Dogra riots. Hundreds of muslims being killed was the reason Pakistani tribals attacked Kashmir. Now before nationalists start barking at me, I am not supporting or justfying anything, just stating that the Pakistanis didn't attack for no reason at all.
i think most of the conflicts of the past 80 years have just been put on a holding pattern. we haven't ended any of them because of the mild way we fight wars.....that will change soon....all at once
Doubt
@@Tmb1112 well what conflicts have we really ended since ww2?
That's an very interesting theory. May I'll add my theory that human relationship tenses so hard over years that it will result in a great war every few decades
@@Tmb1112reasoning
@@007kingifrit Most of them. Very few have been long term. Some areas sprout back up in violence again, but most wars end. Korea is the only one I can think of that didn’t. But the Cold War. Gulf War. 2 Afghan wars. Haiti, Grenada, Somalia interventions. East Timor Crisis. Arab Israeli wars. India Pakistan wars. And yes, while there are still occasionally some flare ups in Israel, or on the India Pakistan border, there’s nothing like the wars of the 1900s. Vietnam war: completely over. I mean, we’re considering being allies now after that most recent visit. No way you can claim that Vietnam wasn’t “really ended” right? We helped force British, French, and Israeli troops out of Egypt during the Suez Crisis. Ended many colonial wars through pressure on European powers (not all who listened), but the US definitely put on that pressure to end colonialism since WW2. And 99% of those colonial conflicts have ended since WW2. I really don’t know what you mean. The only reason to think that most conflicts have remained ongoing is if your only knowledge of modern conflicts stems from current events, where you only know the big ones that are still going on, and forgot about all the hundreds of conflicts that started and ended since WW2.
Good work, thank you, everything is short and clear. ❤
Some inaccuracies in the video:
India conducted its first nuclear tests in 1974
Liaquat Ali Khan was the first PM of Pakistan while QuiadeAzam MA Jinnah was First Governer general
And science is stolen from sharia
India's first successful nuclear test was in 1974 when indira gandhi was prime minister... it was the hydrogen bomb that was tested in 1998
good video!
Kashmir Might be muslim Majority but We should not forget there are sizeable non religious Nomads which are included in HIndus and Muslims as the states prefer, Even the muslims mostly of different sects than that of Majority of Pakistan so, both the states have a fear to lose it which is not theirs.
@@RojaJaneman it is not hindu state it was hindu majorty some 800 years ago
Proud both Indian and Pakistan citizens supporting their own governments to destroy politicans. No more politics.
kashmir belongs to Pakistan bcz hyderabad and junagadh leaders wanted to join pakistan but bcz of their majority hindu population they were forced to join india.
land is not earned by begging. Only the powerful owns lands.
The Onion News network had a brilliant article on this conflict.
There are two major factors that mess a nation, one being religious fundamentalism like Sharia laws for Islamic nations and the other being Communism-Socialism, the former being obsolete in the modern political world and the later though a product of the modern industrial world is a stupid quasi religious utopianist daydream not grounded in reality, given Pakistan was not swimming in oil but still enacted Sharia made them fail in the end while India doing the Socialism thing messed it in its infancy.
Pakistan still has British era common law......dont know if u even know what sharia law is to see it implemented.....
Only a few family and criminal laws are sharia based which is only 10% ..
And u forget Pakistan was way ahead of India in industrial development and GDP till 1990 atleast.....
India only took off after 1990
Pakistan was ahead of India in all matters till at least the 1970s and Pakistan isn't a Shariah Law country and never was. Some civil matters are dealt with Shariah and that too are purely based on Choice rest all are by Penal Code
excellent as always
Waiting for your response for 2nd Nagorno-Karabakh conflict 👍
Stop making india pakistan videos .. we are not the same .. one of us it trying to get a flag to the moon and other one has a moon on their flag ... no issues just stop putting us on a single balance to weigh ..
@dieswin_ pakistan will not survive next 10 years
@dieswin_😂😂po*r paxtan has a flaaag on the moon😂😂,Did u study in madrassa 😂😂,And According to UN Sanitation Report of 2019, India's Toilet Access grew to 96% of Population,While Paxtani is at only 81%😂😂,Po*r Paxtani International beggars, While India Continues to BOOM ECONOMICALLY, TECHNOLOGICALLY, DIPLOMATICALLY AND MILITARILY
@dieswin_😂😂po*r paxtan has a flaaag on the moon😂😂,Did u study in madrassa 😂😂,And According to UN Sanitation Report of 2019, India's Toilet Access grew to 96% of Population,While Paxtani is at only 81%😂😂,Po*r Paxtani International beggars, While India Continues to BOOM ECONOMICALLY, TECHNOLOGICALLY, DIPLOMATICALLY AND MILITARILY
@dieswin_😂😂po*r paxtan has a flaaag on the moon😂😂,Did u study in madrassa 😂😂,And According to UN Sanitation Report of 2019, India's Toilet Access grew to 96% of Population,While Paxtani is at only 81%😂😂,Po*r Paxtani International beggars, While India Continues to BOOM ECONOMICALLY, TECHNOLOGICALLY, DIPLOMATICALLY AND MILITARILY
@dieswin_hahaha beggar katora
Sir,a very balanced and true analysis,and yet Kashmir issue can not go away .Pakistan is a predator country based on its founder's ideology and will continue till it runs out of all foreign beneficiaries. One of its PM has set a time limit of 1000 years and as of now it is less than 100 years. So just keep watching!
Kashmir issue can go away if Indian occupied army get out of Kashmir. Founding Father of Pakistan,ideology was better than any Indian Leader for the last 75yrs years Independent history of the two countries.
@@mohammedmir777 First stop begging then we can think of talks😂
Nitpciking; The analysis exclude the latest tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Best geopolitical channel on UA-cam. Bravo!!!
0:13: 🌍 The rivalry between India and Pakistan, both nuclear powers with a combined population of 1.5 billion, poses a high risk of nuclear war and has significant global implications.
4:18: 🔑 Kashmir, a Muslim majority state with a Hindu ruler, was strategically located and desired by India, Pakistan, and China.
8:24: 🔥 India and Pakistan have fought multiple wars over the disputed region of Kashmir, with the conflict starting in 1948 and continuing into the 1970s.
12:40: 🇮🇳🇵🇰 The video discusses the differences between India and Pakistan in terms of their political systems, military influence, and lack of political continuity.
16:58: 💰 India's vibrant startup ecosystem, established pharmaceutical and IT industry, and growing manufacturing sector position it for a better economic future than Pakistan.
Recap by Tammy AI
Good recap. Thanks Tammy AI!
India and paksitan love each other i must say
Kashmir is always be India's part 🇮🇳 .
In ur dream😅
The Lahore Declaration is something from 1999. You meant the Lahore Resolution.
love your work
Siachen glacier is under Indian control.
Hi Times The title could easily have been seventy five more years of pakistan india confrontation
Channel location is Poland this week. There are only old grudges and bitterness passed from the previous generation. You can still free your people.
Thanks
India’s economy now is 3.8 trillion dollars 🇮🇳🇮🇳🫶🫶
The main reason behind Pakistan's creation: The class difference
See the class difference between Gandhi and Jinnah!
yes jinnah was converted one. his grandfather was poor hindu fisherman.
Neither the British Raj officials (Mountbatten, et al.) nor Gandhi and the INC desired partition, that much is clear from primary sources of their discussions. The problem was the Muslim League and Jinnah's change of heart against unity in 1940. It is telling that Pakistan means "Land of the Pure", implying 'others' i.e. non-Muslims and outsiders are filthy and impure. The very concept is a terrible foundation on which to build a viable modern nation. Today we have we have a perpetually failing sharia military-run state funded by Saudi Arabia + China and punctual bailouts from the international community just to avoid complete chaos spilling over, and a rising toxic nationalism in India with Modi and BJP. Partition was probably the greatest human tragedy of the 20th century.
Trivia: Jinnah kept the tuberculosis and lung cancer that were killing him a secret and pushed through negotiations. Had anyone outside his closed circle known they could have stalled talks until his death, derail them, and keep the Indian subcontinent united. Muslims and Hindus (and others!) would have been stronger together as one India
Not true
In this case Bharatis(endian) have no space to lie
First it was Partition of Punjab
Which happened on the votes in Punjab legeslative assembly where Muslim leauge and Congress was not even mattered
It was minority sikh/Hindu Punjabis demanded partition of Punjab
@@usmanqureshi08you too are speaking half truths no better than above gentle man .
Pakistan cannot claim these lands, there was an agreement, they have to respect it.
Agreements are always stipulated by human error. Look at most borders in the world. Drawn by British or French, with no knowledge of the people. Disband these borders. You're actually brothers and sisters.
And? India ignored agreements by supporting Tamil Tigers and how they have treated ethnic/religious minorities within their own country and agreements with the USA/Canada on not killing citizens of foreign nations.
They have broken multiple agreements like so many other nations, agreement doesn’t mean much sadly
An agreement made by an fudel load and not by the people 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@raquetdude Yes, they do. Borders are drown and have to be respected. And you can always find imperfections in any country's policies to justify invasion. That's how Indian territories, that are now Pakistan were invaded and islamized in the first place, some Indian pirates attacked some muslim ship and it was used as a justification to invade Indian land, even if India didn't have a fleet and didn't control it's waters at the time.
Agreements hahaha
8:59 you need to correct your information India attacked lahore our city in 1965 in night cowardly and then what Pakistan did with them you can search,go search find out then again edit your video and uplaod again..before making a channel like this come with 100% preparation man..see you next time
Yeah we skipped whole pakistan & border areas & your army & directly attacked lahora via a portal 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Map is wrong siachin is part of india
You cut siachin from middle
👎
India first tested nuclear bomb in 1974. Please correct yourself .Then India tested five more nuclear tests in 1998 that were retaliated by Pakistan by testing six nuclear bombs thereafter in 1998
Imf loan superpower will win.
Around 15:10 I was like “oh god, not another masterworks ad…”
god job👍
Allah bhi pareshan hai inse. 🤣🤣🤣
@dieswin_Worshipping a fake god with no face is better lol
No proof for its existence also 😂
@dieswin_
Bhikari
@dieswin_ Mulla bomb fod ja apne mulk mai
I totally agree with the conclusion of the video .... why not Pakistan and India can make bilateral relations between each other when There are many commonalities between the two.. ethnic, regional, cultural.
Even religion when it comes to morality .. it's simply needed to dive deep in.
And yes in the present setting the stakes are high and there are many new dimensions than in the past.... but then again the will is all that matters..
We the people also must do something about it..
Taking the example of the European union... European countries in the early modern period fought wars and wanted individual hegemony over all Europe. They were brutal rivals of each other.. but even they came to the point where they made a Union .. .. why not Pakistan and India .
I believe we can. ❤
By the way.. thank you so much for the video.. it was good with balanced analysis 🙂.
What commonalities? The only people in entire gangadesh aka fake India who are related to Pakistanis are indian panjabis who barely make up 2% of India's whole population if any muhajir has warm feelings for the dindus, they can just go back to Uttar Pradesh Delhi or whatever sh t hole they crawled out of and see how the dindus treat em
@@slowknife2873 are you low cast people ?
as a brahmin i approve that were both the same
@@emperor615
Kashmir's population is overwhelmingly Muslim and hostile to Indian rule, and it would still be like that even if every Kashmiri Pandit returned. That's why India never let the Kashmiri people vote on their own destiny.
India has to use its military not only to fight Pakistan, but to keep the people of Kashmir subjugated.
Oh really, what do you happened until 2019. It was a state and it had voting system. But government there was corrupt. It had no development for 70 years and people were resorting to stoning and joining terrorist groups. Now, atleast some jobs has been created and massive infrastructure has been pushed in Srinagar and surrounding area. Even people being interviewed are happy. Army are now mostly in border areas. Go check out photos and stop your propoganda.
@@poohthegreatslayerstop your bullshit. Kashmir HDI is generally among the highest in whole of south asia, and always has been.
@@poohthegreatslayerif Kashmir are happy in India that’s great but there is tons of evidence to show that india is brutally oppressing Kashmir
India could win a referendum on a small margin. Not all Muslims are pro Pakistan.
Referendum will be held only after Pakistan vacates POK and GB.
If there was formal application by legitimate Kashmir authorities to join India then Kashmir belongs to India.
Then there is the will of the people. Will they be ever allowed to vote so as to provide self determination?
The thing is, Junagadh was a Hindu Majority region which exceeded to Pakistan bcz it had a hindu ruler, but India didn't except this and invaded the state even before Pakistan could send troops. But when Kashmir with a Muslim majority exceeded to India by its Hindu ruler and Pakistan reacted by invading it, it wasn't accepted by India. Isn't that hypocrisy
@@simulify8726 Yes thats right. Whatever the reasons were of their will to cede to Pakistan doesn't matter. what matters is thay they willed to cede to Pakistan.
As for demographic change, Sindh and Punjab were also Hindu majority way before partition. But alongside Kashmir, they also changed to majority Muslim due to conversion. So since there is no objection on Punjab and Sindh being part of Pak bcz they used to be hindu majority, there shall be no such objection on Kashmir either
@@simulify8726 there is no such thing as Muslim brotherhood if that was the case then there would have been no Bangladesh and balochistan
For your information, not all Pakistanis and Indians are same. The Indian race is present in East Pakistan, which are nationalities such as Punjabi and Sindhi. As for West Pakistan, the majority of Baloch and Pashtuns live there, and they are ethnicities from an Iranian family, such as Persian and Kurdish. The Pashtuns are Afghans divided between Afghanistan and Pakistan. As for the Baloch, they live in Balochistan, which is divided between Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. They are like Kurds, and the closest nationality to them linguistically is Kurds, but culturally, they live like Gulf Bedouins and are present in the Gulf as well.
India itself is much more diverse. Punjabis and Sindhis are very small minorities in India. Baloch trace their lineage to Syria. Pashtuns are ban i isrrail their tribe names match with isrrail ten tribe names. afgan was grandson of saul. Locals could not pronounce Cohen so it became Khan. No Zoroastrian artifacts found in Pakistan while Buddhist artifacts found in Pakistan. Balochistan was a major part of Indus valley civilization
There is no such thing as "Indian race" it's called Indo-Aryan and most indians and Pakistanis are mostly dravidians who speak indo aryan language
@@cyberverse9141 Dravidians are a small minority in Pakistan mostly in south Sindh and south Balochistan.
Punjabis are diverse.
@@muslim_first Indo-Aryans were white people related to Europeans. When they invaded south asia they mixed with local dravidian population. Sindhi, Punjabis, Hindis, Bengalis don't look anything like original aryans. Only Dardic people are last pure Indo-Aryans
@@cyberverse9141 Kashmir Gilgit Baltistan north Balochistan KPK are cold snow mountains Punjab Sindh South Balochistan strong sun warm climate. Punjabis are very diverse. Punjabis in North Punjab Pakistan and locals of Azad Kashmir are close to same. Many Kashmiris are living in Punjab for centuries because of close proximity and search for agriculture rich land. They have embraced Punjab Allama Iqbal was Kashmiri from Sialkot. Punjabi Pakistanis and Kashmiris live together like Hindkowaan and Pakhtuns in KPK and Baloch and Sindhis in Sindh as half of Baloch tribes live in Sindh the city with most pashtuns is Karachi in Sindh. In Pakistan we are connected in every province
This video fails to address the will of the Kashmiri people which is either independence or an autonomous merger with Pakistan
do you represent 100% of kashmiri's ? I know many people who openly posted through youtube videos that they want to remain in india and never in pakistan. So what you will say about it. how can you force your will on them ?
imagine being in conflict with gandhi i wonder what that must have been like
In 2035 you are going to make video on breakdown of pakistan 😂
hahahaha beta go back to dreaming about beautiphool izrael womaan
Are u sure about that?
What about khalistan 😂
Independence for Kashmir, let the ppl there be free from both nations.
It's not that simple
We r asking for the Independence of the Native Americans, Aboriginal Australians !!..
Make a Sikh State from India while u're at it
Delusional Western living in his lala land
@@lamchunting856make a sikh state from Pakistan
Poland doesn't allow a single Muslim migrant in,and u saying Pakistan,India are the same. Wow,Records of Hypocrisy broken. I understand u can't digest India's rise,post colonial suppression. I inform u with a heavy heart,India is unstoppable.Sorry for you.
Btw,pls add a video on allowing Muslim migration to Poland
I assure u,they can learn Polish and then,u all will be the same too..same culture u, know.
not at all Biased, fair and neutral video, thank you for maintaining your integrity
2:34 pic says what was pakistan in 1947 , rich 🤑, arrogant ...after 75 years where pakistan stands???
More wars happen between india and pakistan in the comment box than in the battlefield 😂😂😂
Pakistan economy and political stability is doomed by their rich Pak Army generals. Being an India I always support that we should remain neutral with Pakistan. There is no requirement of any kind of relationship with an unstable country like Pakistan. We should focus on our development and our progress. Pakistan is not our head ache hence we should keep our border closed and protected and ignore them.
This is a very emotive topic.... but the facts are clear while India rises Pakistan falls... each had 75 years to be peaceful and create a good society. India is trying whilst Pakistan wants to be this noisy neighbour... keeping Kashmir issue alive for Pakistan meeams the military controls the agenda ... I think China also want this region to be in a mess
You fail to mention that india is just hindu majority but secular and Pakistan isn't just Muslim majority but an islamic state , the first of its kind in the world
The one fundamental factor that has put India at Pakistan at odds in almost every aspect till this day: Religion.
Radicalism not religion brother
Not religion but islam.
They are problem in every nation around the world.
The country was founded for this religion, whose overwhelming majority adheres to this religion, the country that funds terrorism of this religion, the country (and people) that put religion over kinship (essentially saying that it doesn't matter that Indians are their blood-relatives), the country whose laws are based off of this religion.
Introduction to Pakistan. @@manideep82
India has good relation with almost entire middle east, including major nation like saudi and UAE. Even Bangladesh which used to be a part of pakistan has fairly good relation with us and they are too muslim majority.
So just saying the conflict is just bcz of religion just shows your ignorance.
@@SujalRajput10 That because those Middle Eastern countries are completely different countries to begin with. Say what you want but half the time the conflicts that happen between IN and PK is fundamentally connected with the differences of religion. I'm in no way saying which religion is better or worse. I'm saying the differences in religion has always been one of the fundamental within the same society that causes conflict.
Honour Instrument of accession and call it a day, else face the same reality with higher casualties.
What is the relationship between this channel and Caspian Report, if any?
Both of the (creators/youtubers/internet personalities) were former Russian subjects. GTBT= POLISH
Caspian Report= Azeri
@@sleepyjoe7518 For some reason, I just assumed they are the same person.
@@Hannodb1961 yea... the accent and voice is kinda similar
Me too
One important point:
When Pakistan attacked Kashmir to take it over, Kashmir wasn't a part of India. Therefore, India's intervention would have been a violation of international law, because technically the invaders weren't Pakistani army but tribal proxies acting on behalf of Pakistani army.
This made it conditional that Kashmir become a part of India so that this attack might be treated as an internal disturbance of India and dealt with accordingly.
It became a full fledged war later is another story.
Kashmir King Hari Singh requested support from India and Kashmir was part of India when Indian army entered Kashmir
Why don't they make Kashmir a independent country like Switzerland
Switzerland have Swiss and Kashmir have some one else . That's a costly deal to keep them independent for Westerners. It will end up another Afghanistan. For us, current scenario is best
Kashmir is surrounded by 3 nuclear powers, all of whom are hostile to one another
@@s9ka972
No,we kasmiris want a independent state.
Why is Siachen Glacier not shown as part of India? Learn your facts before making videos like this.
Jinna himself was in congress first.
Seems the script of the video was taken out from an British schoolbook words like " predominantly hindu and predominantly minority "these words are used by Britishers to mimic this conflict unavoidable even though it was created by the British themselves since: muslim league party is established and maintained by British government from the beginning
It wasn’t created by the British - there’s two religious groups that hate each other. The British somewhat kept a lid on it.
Doubtful. The British are a shaddow of their former selves. People need to accept that people have their own agency in other countries
Summary: colonialism did India dirty
In your description it makes this clear that logically bharati administered Kashmir should be part of Pakistan.
It is kind of like Russian occupying parts of western Ukraine. Eastern Ukrainian still had a lot of ethnic Russians so it make bharat double wrong.
What he meant was, Kashmir was predominantly Muslim with hindu leader while junagadh was predominantly hindu with Muslim leader. Now junagadh is in India but Kashmir isn't in Pakistan.
@@wazukyan7696 I agree, If there had been a referendum that is probably what would have happened. But Pak decided to Invade J&K which then lead to Hari Singh requesting India to intervene and the rest is history.
@@harlowidaBoth were there. Read how Jinnah sent forces to incite them to rise against the King. Then tribal forces attacked in Azad kashmir.
@@harlowida hyderabad was integral part of India. People wanted to join India. Nissan wanted independent nation. There was arm uprising against nizam by communist peasants. Indian government also didn't want to divide North and south. Nehru was out of India and sardar vaallabhai Patel aa acting prime minister decided to invade India. It was best decision. As a hyderabadi, I am proud of India first. Everyone here also will say the same thing.
What are you saying ?dont bring your half cooked brain,
India whoul have never needed to rule on kashmir(a hindu rular country), if pakistan hadn't attacked kashmir.
The attack by pakistan triggred, king of kashmir to succeed into India.
Keep this in mind next time
It is so weird to me that in our modern world, two countries that have so much in common can be so fiercely divided, seemingly solely on the basis of different religions. I don't get it. Like 99% of things can be in common, but they will fight tooth and nail over that 1% difference? Bizarre.
Did someone say Korea, Germany or Pakistan itself prior to 1971?
Britishers were too successful in divide and conquer. Indians too deceitful. Pakistan too moronic. UN too useless.
Pakistan should have told the UN to fuck off and taken Srinigar. Everything would have ended.
After all, India annexed significantly more territory than the whole of Kashmir combined.
@@winstonmaraj8029 Korea and Germany had divisions placed upon them by external forces. Pakistan itself was the subject of my original post, so I don't think that requires much explanation.
I think the only other place where minor divisions create such intense divisions is both the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa. Both being more or less the starting point for humanity has given both regions plenty of time to develop ethnic divisions, and Islam's fractious nature just pours gasoline on that already burning fire.
@@daniell1483clearly you have no knowledge about India's vast diversity. Every state of India have different tradition, culture and language. You can say 30% common with Pakistan mainly from North-west part of India. I am from east part of India and we have no similarity with Pakistan even our languages are totally different.
Coz Pakistan was created on hindu and india hatred...no chance of peace for them ..
Jaa jaa India Kashmir se nikal jaa
Go go India, get out of Kashmir
But just how did Pakistan move armed forces into Bangladesh? Did they march through India?
By ocean
@@satishthokare6292 Makes sense
lmao it took an entire subcontinent worth of space from the mainland for Indians to achive their "victory"
Most indian are not poorest . India is 5th largest economy.
What a quagmire.
Then stay away from it
Please change your thumbnail, its a wrongly interpreted map of India
Wrong Indian Map showing.
27th February 2019, india did a huge drama of Air-strike in Pakistan and next morning Pakistan Airforce teached them lesson destroyed 2 jets captured their 1 pilot "Abhinandan" and Indian air force attacked their own helicopter and killed army personal oh man who will mention all this ?😂
tumahre 93000 ko bittha ke joo roti khillaye usska bill bhar pehle bsdk... BANGLADESH - DONE
NEXT - BALOCHISTAN
Imf loan power
China and usa are dual allah
There is a general perception that Bengali was refused as an official language, it's wrong.
It has been widely reported even by historians, but facts speak otherwise, and I'm shocked why no-one has challenged such a childish lie.
Before 1971, Pakistan had 3 constitutions, first in 1954, which was completed but not implemented largely due to the difference in power ratio between the prime minister and president.
Second constitution, and the first to be approved was in 1956.
The third I believe was in 1961, under military rule, it was also approved.
Each one of those constitutions declare Urdu and Bengali to be official languages of Pakistan, equally.
It's baffling that why this language lie continues to persist. Each of those constitutions are public documents, it's really shocking.