КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @WilliamShinal
    @WilliamShinal Рік тому +231

    You might not like the accusatory nature of this statement but this was ORIGINALLY a distribution of ChromiumOS called Cloudready. By purchasing Neverware, Google has dodged making a version of ChromeOS that is based on THE ChromeOS they use on their Chromebooks. They know how to keep their cards close.

    • @warthunder1969
      @warthunder1969 Рік тому +17

      True but they also did alot of "under the hood" tweaks to bring Flex in line with stock Chrome OS. To be honest I owned a Acer Chromebook Cb3-111 and if all you do is stuff in the browser (which is how Chrome OS was born) then its fine for a side machine. I've got it running on 2 older system (one is a lenovo thinkpad L512 and the other is a Lenovo chromebook x131e that became unsupported) and it runs fine on both. Again nothing groundbreaking but good enough for basic computing.

    • @Sumire973
      @Sumire973 Рік тому +13

      CloudReady turns into CentOS 2.0 basically, epic EEE move from Google.

    • @tacokoneko
      @tacokoneko Рік тому +6

      im going to be honest i have used chromiumos and i am not really sure what your point is because chromiumos with google apps installed is borderline identical to normal chromeos, probably always better because chromeos can be locked so you don't have permissions to enable developer mode but if you compile chromiumos yourself that does not apply

    • @tacokoneko
      @tacokoneko Рік тому +3

      in the chromiumos i installed there was even google play store and the android apps worked on x86 CPU which seems to be the big issue for some people, i have a video of it on my channel edit: nvm that is a chromeos build but i used a chormiumos separately and i could post videos of that if someone asks

    • @Sumire973
      @Sumire973 Рік тому +1

      @@tacokoneko which Chromium OS build are you talking about?

  • @GrdDog
    @GrdDog Рік тому +204

    I'm running Flex on an old Lenovo laptop (with decent specs); gives me limited things I can do, but I only takes this when I'm out and about and do not want to take my tablet, one thing I did notice was the increase in the battery usage length to 7 hours and yes I tested that 5 times, over all a decent o.s. that can get small things done, I like it.

    • @moonphoenix9324
      @moonphoenix9324 Рік тому +19

      If you want a less limited experience, install a linux distro (like PopOS or Fedora) for very similar performance

    • @JohnSmith-xq1pz
      @JohnSmith-xq1pz Рік тому

      Does Flex have have a dark mode?

    • @TheOperatingSystemWorld
      @TheOperatingSystemWorld Рік тому +9

      @@JohnSmith-xq1pz It's coming to version 105. The latest version is 104.

    • @BotanistOnDuna
      @BotanistOnDuna Рік тому +8

      chromeos sucks, get a linux distro based on ubuntu. ubuntu based distros are super easy to use, apt is the easiest package manager ever. it also has more apps and you can even run windows programs on it through wine.

    • @TheOperatingSystemWorld
      @TheOperatingSystemWorld Рік тому +8

      @@BotanistOnDuna Chrome OS is a ChromiumOS-based Distro. You can install Linux Apps.

  • @StuffOfSonny
    @StuffOfSonny Рік тому +142

    My only guess as to why the Google Play store (and others) might not work is that they might be expecting an ARM based ChromeOS, and not x86.

    • @that_leaflet
      @that_leaflet Рік тому +53

      Most Chromebooks are x86 and can run Android apps. It's just Google keeping certain features exclusive to the "official" ChromeOS.

    • @sunightmc
      @sunightmc Рік тому

      @@ilan6291 what features exactly were removed?

    • @gblaudio
      @gblaudio Рік тому +6

      This is just google wanting some more user data....

    • @edbp7689
      @edbp7689 Рік тому +9

      Android programs are written in Java and more recently, Kotlin, they're both interpreted programming languaje (a.k.a. not compiled), so the underlying hardware is irrelevant as long as there's a full featured interpreter (e.g. Dalvik).

    • @sorinl8467
      @sorinl8467 Рік тому

      It's a cut edition. Some kind of shareware but buy a Chromebook if you want more.

  • @tOSdude
    @tOSdude Рік тому +24

    One note about the media creator: The reason it asks for model numbers is so you can recover other chomebooks, not just flex. All of those other options will install the real chrome OS.

  • @mjdxp5688
    @mjdxp5688 Рік тому +185

    This could have a lot of uses that people aren't really thinking of. It could be great for schools with older, out of support Chromebooks which no longer officially received ChromeOS updates. I guess this could be useful for developers as well for testing.

    • @mxmobile5619
      @mxmobile5619 Рік тому +22

      Older chromebooks have no support under chromeOS flex due to their locked down boot protocol

    • @helloworld145
      @helloworld145 Рік тому +5

      @@mxmobile5619 With some modding, you can get past that locked boot protocol on some chromebooks.

    • @mxmobile5619
      @mxmobile5619 Рік тому +22

      @@helloworld145 “with some modding”. Yes you can with some modding but realistically most people will look at the underpowered hardware and lack of official support and call it a day.

    • @KisameSempai
      @KisameSempai Рік тому +10

      @@tanawatjukmongkol2178 You don't understand. in the most recent chromebooks, the bootloader is locked and you cannot install linux or even chromeos flex. that made me not buy a chromebook. I bought a used windows 10 business laptop instead and boot win10, ubuntu, fedora, android and chromeos on it.

    • @kevinwong_2016
      @kevinwong_2016 Рік тому +1

      @@mxmobile5619 yeah I thought that

  • @jayrome8764
    @jayrome8764 Рік тому +28

    I'm running actual ChromeOS (rammus) via brunch framework on a Thinkpad T550 and I am very happy with it. I can run Android apps and I even rooted the Android container. ChromeOS absolutely flies on this machine (16gb ram, i7). I dual boot it with Windows 11. I get better battery life running on the ChromeOS side, so it is my daily driver. I only boot into Windows to run software unique to Windows.

  • @ynotaz
    @ynotaz Рік тому +2

    I put Flex on an old thinkpad. It works great. Theo is right about it not having a lot of app options. For basic everyday use and browsing it is handy.

  • @m4rt_
    @m4rt_ Рік тому +18

    Just use Linux for giving old stuff new life, it is less bloated.
    Linux is also good for new computers, tbh everyone should use Linux, it's great

    • @vaseklepic12
      @vaseklepic12 Рік тому +3

      I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
      Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.
      Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

    • @turle8645
      @turle8645 Рік тому +1

      Average Linux user

    • @m4rt_
      @m4rt_ Рік тому

      @@vaseklepic12 you know what I mean by linux

    • @m4rt_
      @m4rt_ Рік тому

      @@turle8645 linux is the best os

    • @godlesssociety498
      @godlesssociety498 Рік тому +1

      GNU/Linux is only great for server room trolls and basement dwelling IT goblins. Some of us use computers to make money, literally I quit my day job and now make money off of my pc. There's really no time for "Linux" I installed it last week and lasted 2 days and reverted back to windows. I actually just received a notification that I've been paid for the month, something that would be impossible using "Linux". It's pretty, it's fast and secure (I suffered a ransomeware attack which prompted me to switch to Linux) but none of my upgrades work properly such as my audio and gpu. Nah thanks

  • @thelakeman2538
    @thelakeman2538 Рік тому +37

    Just install a linux distro at that point, you will be actually getting a full desktop os, or just stick to whatever old windows os came preinstalled with that laptop unless you wanna use the internet. My advice is to try some lightweight linux distro.

    • @durschfalltv7505
      @durschfalltv7505 Рік тому +5

      Exactly.

    • @Username-xr5bx
      @Username-xr5bx Рік тому +5

      IDK why some people choose spyware over freedom

    • @bandiddums
      @bandiddums Рік тому +3

      Honestly I'm only interested because of the possibility of running android apps but since that doesn't seem to be possible it's pretty much useless for me

    • @durschfalltv7505
      @durschfalltv7505 Рік тому +2

      @@Username-xr5bx they want to give responsibility to someone else.

    • @durschfalltv7505
      @durschfalltv7505 Рік тому +1

      @@bandiddums wdym you can run Android apps on Linux. There is way droid for Wayland.

  • @abaneyone
    @abaneyone Рік тому +34

    I like this but I think doing a fresh install of a Linux distribution, installing Linux over the existing operating system is a better idea. I've installed Linux on old laptops and PCs many times, always 100% success.

    • @sticky59
      @sticky59 Рік тому +1

      Now your talking !

    • @chemicallust77
      @chemicallust77 Рік тому +1

      Agreed...the limitations of the Chrome OS don't make it very appealing...I have something like a netbook (definitely more powerful) HP 3105m with 8gb RAM that I run Mint on and it works great...mostly use it for work and music in my den/workshop...I'm kind of curious if a version of the Chrome OS can be made to side load on an older Android tablet 🤔

    • @tartara3315
      @tartara3315 Рік тому

      Just installed Manjaro, Zorin and Mint linux distributions one after another on an old laptop - only one of those worked with internet and that one only recognised Ethernet too (others straight up denied both Ethernet and WiFi), I tried everything but couldn't get it to work although on windows they work just fine so issue is not hardware related. it's a 32 bit based CPU so not a lot of options to choose from (even among Linux distributions), just what's available soo yeah now I'm trying Chrome OS!
      Btw I tried win 10 32 bit too but it was too slow and laggy and Win 8.1 32 bit was a tad bit faster but still not very good...

    • @tartara3315
      @tartara3315 Рік тому

      Tried windows 7 32 bit too, worked wonderfully but as Microsoft's official Win 7 ISO isn't available, I had to get a 3rd party version with plenty of viruses and trojan on it... so I gave up on it

    • @gary4689
      @gary4689 8 місяців тому +1

      I am happy that google added this functionality, however. I think it might serve as a gateway drug to Linux, considering that ChromeOS is essentially a specialized version of it.

  • @hamzapuris
    @hamzapuris Рік тому +2

    Great video and an idea! Great for testing and learning about ChromeOS while using old hardware.

  • @Hodenkat
    @Hodenkat Рік тому +7

    I personally don't have a reason to install ChromeOS on anything right now, but I can see where it might help those who are not technical and need limited choices like doing everything through a browser. Windows just has too many settings and things that can get a user into trouble. The same applies to Linux. For a lot of seniors this is more than enough.

  • @AMKpolka5
    @AMKpolka5 Рік тому +26

    Nice video but for anyone interested installing this on an old desktop or laptop please make sure that the devices motherboard supports UEFI/Secure Boot otherwise, even if it says you installed Flex OS successfully, you won't ever be able to boot onto the OS.

    • @breadone_
      @breadone_ Рік тому +6

      google moment

    • @KatyushaLauncher
      @KatyushaLauncher Рік тому +6

      Not necessarily true, I was able to install Chrome OS Flex on an old HP OEM PC and an old Lenovo Thinkpad both which neither support UEFI or Secure Boot but was still able to boot and tinker around with Chrome OS Flex

    • @ericodijk
      @ericodijk Рік тому

      My 16 year old laptop runs perfectly, no UEFI or whatever, just standard Bios. And I even managed to let it multiboot with Linux.

  • @fexploder3281
    @fexploder3281 Рік тому +163

    I don't know about you but in my opinion I am like "Who wants to install Chrome OS on their computer" because I don't like Chrome OS but anyways, nice video. Keep it up!

    • @aleksandar6056
      @aleksandar6056 Рік тому +18

      I don't like Chrome even as a web browser... Even Edge is better

    • @KEN4K
      @KEN4K Рік тому +30

      @@aleksandar6056 which is funny because edge is chromium based

    • @affyne
      @affyne Рік тому +15

      @@KEN4K without any bloat* under the hood edge is based on chromium sure but i must say that chrome itself sucks, too much memory usage and whatnot. i've been using chrome for like 6-7 years and i am not even a microsoft fan but Edge IS way better than chrome in all aspects.
      that microsoft who is infamous for the bloat in their apps, for once they are doing good in something lol

    • @jean-olivierjanvier6030
      @jean-olivierjanvier6030 Рік тому +4

      ChromeOS is, to me, the iPad OS of computers

    • @n124ajdx
      @n124ajdx Рік тому +4

      I'll install Chrome OS just to try it for like a week but I won't stick with it.
      Just like how I install a random Linux distro from time to time.
      Edge has the necessary tools that a browser needs without the garbage bloatwares of chrome

  • @Puzzlers100
    @Puzzlers100 Рік тому +5

    I find this bizzare, but I never used my school chromebook until my school let me keep it when graduating, where I forced it to run Gnu+linux rather than Google+linux and now I'm really happy with it.

  • @martinus_mars
    @martinus_mars Рік тому +26

    Very few reasons to get Flex. The installation drive issue is critical and so obvious that it's hard to believe that it wasn't done on purpose, but I do not know why they would do that

    • @elmariachi5133
      @elmariachi5133 Рік тому +11

      Down dumbing. Today's mainstream consumer is not supposed to being able to do such complicated things like decide between 2(Two!) options.

    • @Qwerty-uiop
      @Qwerty-uiop Рік тому +6

      If a person is advanced enough to go into boot manager, they can definitely select their boot drive. Maybe google thinks grandmas will install this

    • @chrismclean3848
      @chrismclean3848 Рік тому +3

      I’m sure it’s a bug since flex is still in development. Maybe they just automatically install on the drive with more storage (which is still stupid).

  • @sofiaknyazeva
    @sofiaknyazeva Рік тому +41

    For me, it'd be much better if I use a lightweight Linux distro, instead this one but still interesting, since I never installed/used it before.

    • @famousmwofficial8046
      @famousmwofficial8046 Рік тому

      it's a light weight Linux distro made by Google. give it a shot 😉

  • @butlerwm
    @butlerwm Рік тому

    I installed it on a 2008 Toshiba laptop. Runs better on that than my Lenovo Chromebook. For all my browsing and streaming needs, it does a very good job. Tried installing only my HP laptop (2002 model) and had problems. Determined it was a bad memory module. Replaced it and installed just fine. I lets me put some machines back in service that had hit end of life.

  • @allanmacleod1899
    @allanmacleod1899 Рік тому +1

    I am ruuning chrome os flex on a 2007 macbook it works great and gave this old laptop new life .I only have 2 gig of ram but it is still fast,

  • @mla_den
    @mla_den Рік тому +17

    Tip: you can install chrome os on any drive you want you just have to tinker a little in the terminal
    You can hit ctrl+alt+f2
    Enter “chronos” for the username
    Type in “sudo fdisk -l” and find the exact name of the drive you want to install on
    Then you can type in “sudo chromeos-install --dst /dev/DRIVENAME --target-bios efi” and boom
    Edit: never mind, the shortcut was disabled in the stable release along with shell access in general

    • @themonkeyman2790
      @themonkeyman2790 Рік тому +1

      But he installed chrome os "flex" in this video

    • @mla_den
      @mla_den Рік тому

      @@themonkeyman2790 that doesn’t matter, they’re essentially the same thing just for different hardware, the command still works

    • @themonkeyman2790
      @themonkeyman2790 Рік тому

      @@mla_den 👍

    • @kr6to409
      @kr6to409 Рік тому

      So we gonna go for the Dev one?

  • @Eskom_SA
    @Eskom_SA Рік тому +9

    Pretty sure ChromeOS is Linux based
    Which begs the question why use ChromeOS?
    When you could use an actually functional more
    lightweight OS that is opensource and doesnt require
    a google account and also allows any app to be installed
    much easier

    • @paulstubbs7678
      @paulstubbs7678 Рік тому +2

      I'm a tad disappointed that Mozilla didn't do the same with Firefox - but then again a lightweight Linux with Firefox is about the same, it's just annoying that Google has the space all to itself.

    • @chrismclean3848
      @chrismclean3848 Рік тому

      It’s good for people for use Google products a lot like docs or gmail. Just basic internet usage, good for older people

    • @chrismclean3848
      @chrismclean3848 Рік тому

      @@paulstubbs7678 a Firefox os would have less bloat and Spyware than chrome os. Idk if it would be better than standard Linux tho.

    • @kevinwong_2016
      @kevinwong_2016 Рік тому

      @@paulstubbs7678 there was fire fox os but it failed

    • @paulstubbs7678
      @paulstubbs7678 Рік тому

      @@kevinwong_2016 Interesting, never saw that one mentioned anywhere, no wonder it failed.
      At that time (Chrome OS debut) all I remember from Mozilla was a new phone OS that wasn't compatible with anything, so kind of useless (as in what were they thinking)

  • @UNICORNSF3ProgameplayProRACER
    @UNICORNSF3ProgameplayProRACER Рік тому +4

    Great material!

  • @StoneThrower04
    @StoneThrower04 Рік тому +1

    @ThioJoe the list of manufacturers is there because it is the chromebook recovery utility. it was used to recover chromebooks before it was used to download chromeos flex

  • @KISSFanDan1995
    @KISSFanDan1995 Рік тому +2

    I remember those netbooks. I had one (2010-13) and it ran horribly on windows 7 starter so I just downgraded it to Windows XP Pro and upgraded the Ram from 2 to 4 gigs and it ran flawlessly.

  • @Omooze
    @Omooze Рік тому +17

    If chromeos flex added play store support i would definitely install it

    • @pyp2205
      @pyp2205 Рік тому +1

      Well it was just released recently, so I guess Google might add Google Play support at some point.

    • @AlphaDango
      @AlphaDango Рік тому

      Just install Android then?

    • @barracuda861
      @barracuda861 Рік тому +1

      I wonder if Bluestack will work. Then you will have game support. This program works great on my Windows 11 laptop.

    • @alvzcizzler
      @alvzcizzler Рік тому +2

      There's a modified version of Chrome OS that supports Google Play for all computers

    • @linuxization4205
      @linuxization4205 Рік тому

      Just emulate an arm64 virtual machine?

  • @KristophM
    @KristophM Рік тому +7

    Just use an actual GNU/Linux distro. I use Manjaro on my 10 year old Dell laptop and it transformed it as if it was brand new. Screw Windows. I'll have to check out Chrome OS just for the shits and giggles.

  • @anshumanmishraw
    @anshumanmishraw Рік тому

    Amazing work, Thanks Joe.

  • @DimusTech
    @DimusTech Рік тому +2

    I tried it on an old macbook at work, honestly, works much better than a new macbook lol.
    But I'd really wish we could put an ISO of it on Ventoy or something.

  • @burgersnchips
    @burgersnchips Рік тому +11

    I could have sworn I installed ChromeOS year ago on a random PC or a virtual machine when it genuinely was just a Web browser.
    Today though to revive old tech I'd prefer to just install a lightweight standard Linux distro for the flexibility.

    • @encycl07pedia-
      @encycl07pedia- Рік тому

      @Matt React It depends. The Web has been built to be a kind of "safe" OS. With HTML5 and all the applications that run on Javascript libraries, you can do quite a lot within your web browser. I've even used a text editor designed to behave like vim attached to Google Drive all in the web browser.

  • @kennystrawnmusic
    @kennystrawnmusic Рік тому +6

    One thing I’m sure most aren’t aware of is that Chrome OS *is* Linux under the hood - more so than Android in fact because there’s an X server (on older builds) and a Wayland compositor (on newer builds) along with a full GNU stack that the Google stuff is running on top of, not just BusyBox and some obscure Java-based display server in the Android case. When you “install Linux” on a Chromebook you’re really just installing an LXC container. Gentoo’s Portage package manager is even used as part of the build process.

  • @stevenadams9915
    @stevenadams9915 Рік тому +1

    Hey bro, I really enjoy your content fantastic work.

  • @chriskasprzyk6235
    @chriskasprzyk6235 Рік тому +1

    Watching this on an old low power intel nuc that I threw chrome os flex on. Works great for what I am wanting it to do.

  • @MarkBarrett
    @MarkBarrett Рік тому +3

    When I installed ChromeOS a few months ago as an alternate OS, it replaced my backup storage drive. (Thanks guys.)

  • @ranawaqashaider
    @ranawaqashaider Рік тому +3

    ChromeOS Flex is really a nice initiative but I would prefer FydeOS for chromeOS. Its a solid OS for chromeOS flex alternative with playstore and drive features..
    By the way Nice Video. Keep it Up bro. Also would like to see your opinion about FydeOS.

  • @MKAdamski
    @MKAdamski Рік тому

    I have a small micro PC (13*13*2cm) that I brought a few years ago. It has a 64 bit processor (Can't remember speed), 4GB RAM, 64GB Storage (Built in to motherboard) and came with Windows 7. The only upgradable part was the RAM. I had installed and used different Ubuntu based OSs and for the past 4 years had it attached to a TV and used it to view UA-cam, Amazon Prime, Plex etc. I noticed that recently (last 6 months) it was lagging whenever I was streaming so tried a few minimal OSs. I tried a few different Chromium based OSs and none worked. This version worked perfect. boots in less than 20 seconds, no lag, no BS apps/programs taking space/memory. Like Thio.Joe I can't install anything from Playstore (but I don't need to as everything I need to access can be done via a browser). Thank you for the video

  • @Thomas-cityd5_gixitxs
    @Thomas-cityd5_gixitxs Рік тому

    That’s really cool for old out dated devices. 👍 nice revamp.

  • @_SJ
    @_SJ Рік тому +4

    Very informative. Will you still make a video about the cheapest Chromebook?

    • @ThioJoe
      @ThioJoe Рік тому +2

      Maybe, still looking into it

  • @floppa9415
    @floppa9415 Рік тому +10

    No Android Apps is big L. Its in my opinion one of the Key Features of the regular ChromeOS.

    • @staidey5994
      @staidey5994 Рік тому

      and that's exactly why they removed it

    • @chrismclean3848
      @chrismclean3848 Рік тому

      Literally, I think the only other reason you could install it is for speed or if you mainly use the internet and Google stuff like drive

  • @jaypormei1881
    @jaypormei1881 Рік тому +1

    At 10:30 you can't get these extensions under cros flex since they are not supported. cros flex had never been introduced to work with native android support but some chromium-based forked ones like FydeOS will does.
    However, official ones (or by using with brunch) works perfectly well on almost any netbooks from 2013 era. I got mine working android support using chrome os rammus image along with brunch framework. All stuffs worked pretty fine so far, however things like HEVC or 4k playback content is horrible even with VLC.

  • @lafamillecarrington
    @lafamillecarrington Рік тому

    I have an old Chromebook that no longer gets security updates, so I installed Cloudready, only to find that the battery had died. Finally got a replacement battery, and discovered that Cloudready had been bought by Google, so now I'll be moving on to Flex! Thanks for the information.

  • @pyp2205
    @pyp2205 Рік тому +14

    Well I guess that means I can try Chrome OS again on a virtual machine.

    • @schnow265
      @schnow265 Рік тому +1

      This is what I would do instantly

    • @ThioJoe
      @ThioJoe Рік тому +3

      You can try but it will take some work

    • @LauwieTech
      @LauwieTech Рік тому +3

      @@ThioJoe i got it working now

    • @mjdxp5688
      @mjdxp5688 Рік тому

      I tried getting this to work in VirtualBox but had no luck. The farthest I was able to get was a loading screen which got nowhere. Apparently VMware users have had better luck though.

    • @VitalVampyr
      @VitalVampyr Рік тому

      @@schnow265 If you haven't done that already you can't do it instantly.

  • @jacobeii
    @jacobeii Рік тому +3

    yknow, I feel like any beginner Linux distro would do the trick. chrome is is literally Linux but more locked-down and personally not a big fan of that lack of support

    • @chrismclean3848
      @chrismclean3848 Рік тому

      It’s better for people who just need to use the internet or older people with no tech knowledge. I would never install this on my computer, but I might on my parent’s pc.

  • @HeltonsComputerRepair
    @HeltonsComputerRepair Рік тому

    If you know how to change settings in the BIOS, you can manually disable what hard drive not to boot. It will make it easier then having to remove the physical hard drive.

  • @prowler1567
    @prowler1567 Рік тому

    Thanks for the heads up Joe.

  • @Gokul_Yt
    @Gokul_Yt Рік тому +10

    The thing that i do with old laptops is install a very small linux or get linux server and install the things Like a Gui and a browser but chrome os is a great way to solve the issue

    • @tilsgee
      @tilsgee Рік тому

      Same, but i prefer Ubuntu with MATE / xfce UI

    • @Gokul_Yt
      @Gokul_Yt Рік тому

      @@tilsgee i also prefer xfce as gui and brave as browser

    • @Cavi587
      @Cavi587 Рік тому +1

      It's not that great actually, it's not fully open source. I wouldn't trust it. I prefer using a lightweight distro on the LXQt desktop enviroment of XFCE.

    • @Gokul_Yt
      @Gokul_Yt Рік тому +1

      @@Cavi587 for noobies its good

    • @tilsgee
      @tilsgee Рік тому

      @@Cavi587 hey, at least it's better than chromeOS Flex, right? XD

  • @rikimaru1007
    @rikimaru1007 Рік тому +4

    Good info. Not a chrome fan. I'm happy to install a low spec linux on old pc's. Xubuntu is my go to for now.

  • @FengLengshun
    @FengLengshun Рік тому +2

    I'd be more interested if it has the ability to run Android apps like in proper Chromebook, but last I heard they specifically can't run Android apps on the Flex so there goes the one usecase that interests me over just dual-booting Linux and Win11.

  • @TirthOdharia
    @TirthOdharia Рік тому

    Just tried flex right before your video went live🤔 what a coincidence!!

  • @williamlarson9227
    @williamlarson9227 Рік тому +3

    I've tried it several times on my Dell Optiplex 755 because Microsoft keeps on telling me that it isn't ready for Windows 11. At first, there were several issues with the old nvidia graphics on my computer but with each update, it has improved to the point where the problems are nonexistent. While the computer has not had problems running Windows 10, I'm still looking around for a new daily driver since Microsoft has chosen to stop supporting older computers. Chrome OS Flex doesn't support Linux currently on my Optiplex. I don't understand operating systems, but I have no problem installing the current version or testing versions of Debian on my computer so I'm not sure why I can't install it through Chrome OS Flex. I know it is silly but the most important programs for me on any operating system are Microsoft Solitaire Collection and the ledger command line program. Currently, I can use those programs on both Windows 10 and a Chromebox or Chromebook. As far as Word Processing is concerned, since WordPerfect 6.0 for Dos I've been happy with any Word Processor along with Unix Text Processing systems such as Roff and family.

    • @Cavi587
      @Cavi587 Рік тому

      I think just putting a Linux distribution straight on there would be a lot better to revive that Dell Optiplex system. It saves you all that playing around with ChromeOS which at the end of the day doesn't really give you a lot more possibilities than Linux. Maybe you can't have the actual Microsoft Solitaire Collection on there (although it's possible but needs some fiddling with Wine etc), but there's a lot of alternatives on there too. Linux is great when it comes to compatibility and support for old computers. I have a few old laptops and PC's that would simply refuse to run Windows 10 or even Windows 7 in some cases, but they work perfectly on lightweight Linux distributions that are always up to date and usable.

  • @slomellos
    @slomellos Рік тому +4

    I would install a lightweight linux distro rather than installing ChromeOS. It's also gonna be lightweight and it's functionality would be scalable as well.

    • @fantamagier
      @fantamagier Рік тому

      A good benefit of Chromebooks are the Support for Android Apps. Linux hast this Feature too but you need more cpu

  • @camtoufan3704
    @camtoufan3704 Рік тому +1

    I believe that installing a full version Linux distro on an old netbook is the better option. I have an 11 year old Acer netbook that have recently installed Linux Mint 21.1 Vera XFCE version on it, and it runs like a charm. It used to have a slow outdated unsupported Window 7 home edition on it.

  • @runthenumbers9698
    @runthenumbers9698 Рік тому +2

    You don't have to take out your drive to select the correct drive. You can disable all drives except the one you want to install to in BIOS

  • @ervinnasiri4247
    @ervinnasiri4247 Рік тому +17

    Hi 😊 I installed it on my HP 250 g3 and it was alright when I enabled the Linux beta but the fact that it couldn't run Android apps sucks 😞 but overall it is good for low end PCs that can't run windows 7 or newer versions

    • @stinkyrat8498
      @stinkyrat8498 Рік тому +7

      just install a linux distro such as lubuntu or peppermint os i can assure you it will be faster than chrome os

    • @sihamhamda47
      @sihamhamda47 Рік тому +2

      There's also a Chrome OS Flex alternative called Fyde OS. It's based on Chrome OS and it supports Android apps. But it requires at least 3rd gen Intel Core CPU or any 64 bit Intel and AMD CPUs released in 2012 and newer in order to run properly

    • @kittenzrulz2314
      @kittenzrulz2314 Рік тому +3

      I recommend installing OpenSuse or Fedora KDE spin. Both are essentically ChromeOS but with a better UI, better app support, and dont have google spyware.

    • @ervinnasiri4247
      @ervinnasiri4247 Рік тому +1

      @@sihamhamda47 I installed it and it's the best chrome os flex alternative 💪

    • @rfdiego777
      @rfdiego777 Рік тому +3

      @@stinkyrat8498 I'm a big Linux user, but for some basic tasks (in particular the internet navigation) I find ChromeOs having better performances on lower specs notebooks

  • @miker8225
    @miker8225 Рік тому +9

    I'm hoping that Google will eventually design a decent OS to rival Windows.

    • @ericodijk
      @ericodijk Рік тому +2

      I hope not. Windows is already there, if you want to rival that: Linux.
      ChromeOS and Flex as well, they are perfectly fitted for the job they need to do. Don't let it get too big and allround like Windows.

    • @Cavi587
      @Cavi587 Рік тому

      A big corporation made closed source OS to replace another big corporation made closed source OS? Seems like the same deal for me, just a different brand. Just use Linux, it's already better than Windows in most cases and it's not built to collect data on it's users. Gaming is one thing that still needs to be worked on, but since the Steam Deck came out (it runs on Linux) there's been many breakthroughs in Linux gaming. You can basically play most games comfortably now.

  • @HearMeLearn
    @HearMeLearn Рік тому +2

    I wonder if you could use chrome os flex on OLD chromebooks that technically aren't supported anymore, so that you can have them be up to date lmao

  • @jumanaalshammary971
    @jumanaalshammary971 Рік тому

    I have an old (weak) laptop that I recently installed Ubuntu on. I wish I watched this video sooner. It might be running better if I had installed ChromeOS and then installed Linux onto it. Also, I wish you could tell us more about how that would work. Will it be a fully-operational Linux Distro, or would it function like a vm?

  • @abdullah-_-.
    @abdullah-_-. Рік тому +13

    From what I see, chrome OS flex is basically the last chance you have to save a really old computer to give to a child to watch videos or something or for other use

    • @abaneyone
      @abaneyone Рік тому +5

      No. Don't forget Linux distributions.

    • @abdullah-_-.
      @abdullah-_-. Рік тому +2

      mean I guess that's cool but I mean, still the rest is pretty much a plan b for anyone wanting to get an old laptop working smooth

    • @Cavi587
      @Cavi587 Рік тому

      I think Linux is the better choice here for both the first choice and the last chance. Linux will just run on everything.

    • @abdullah-_-.
      @abdullah-_-. Рік тому

      @@Cavi587 but chrome OS is a more mainstream version, allot of people don't know or haven't used linux and chrome OS is a more easier to use program

    • @Cavi587
      @Cavi587 Рік тому +1

      @@abdullah-_-. I would disagree. 10 years ago I would agree, but as of right now Linux is a lot more friendly to new users. Basically if you've ever used Windows, you'll be able to use a Linux distro with any of the common Desktop Enviroments.
      Also, ChromeOS isn't completely open source. Linux gives you the freedom any other OS can't.

  • @user-nz6io3ji2h
    @user-nz6io3ji2h Рік тому +3

    installing a lightweight Linux is better if you know how to use Linux. pop_os is really easy to use for basic tasks like web browsing, video calls, etc.

    • @jrdavis1992
      @jrdavis1992 Рік тому +1

      I use Pop_OS myself. Works somewhat good on my Toshiba (Dynabook) Satellite laptop. It even supports a Bluetooth dongle I've been using. ChromeOS Flex doesn't seem to support external BT dongles, AFAIK.

  • @DJ_G-Rod
    @DJ_G-Rod Рік тому

    Not getting notifications on all your vids, so I had to comment to improve the suggestions so I don't miss your videos.

  • @lioneldigennaro7362
    @lioneldigennaro7362 Рік тому

    One more question please. I have a SSD card that I use for extra backup. Do you think I could install chrome OS on the SD card and use it as a tryout each time?

  • @kote315
    @kote315 Рік тому +3

    It's funny to see people talking about operating systems for "very old netbooks". I had a total of 4 netbooks. 2 of them had 32-bit processors. One had a 64-bit CPU, but it still refused to boot 64-bit systems (I believe this is a BIOS limitation). Only one of my netbooks actually had a working 64-bit processor. Single core. 1200 MHz. And 1 GB of memory (out of the box). Hmmm, for some reason it seems to me that Chrome OS will not work well on it. In any case, it won't work any better than any lightweight Linux flavor.

    • @STONE69_
      @STONE69_ Рік тому +1

      You can install Antix Linux lxde on the 32 bit PC, its light with a full desktop and comes with a light weight Browser.

  • @maddog6620
    @maddog6620 Рік тому +4

    You are awesome 😎

    • @ThioJoe
      @ThioJoe Рік тому +2

      No you're awesome

  • @joaocabralpv
    @joaocabralpv Рік тому

    I just installed chrome os flex on anold laptop just to see how it is and this is one of the first videos that poped up

  • @splatube
    @splatube Рік тому +1

    10:40 Chromebooks have google play built-in, but chrome is flex disables this to force you to buy an actual chromebook (if you want android apps that is)

  • @Philipp..
    @Philipp.. Рік тому +6

    At this point a Linux Distribution is a much better option

    • @pyp2205
      @pyp2205 Рік тому +3

      Yeah totally, Linux running on an old computer with low ram runs pretty well. Plus there are so many distros to choose from.

    • @Marcel-dd9ch
      @Marcel-dd9ch Рік тому

      Not for very basic computer users

    • @Philipp..
      @Philipp.. Рік тому +2

      @@Marcel-dd9ch Even for them. Times have changed: It's very easy to install, runs very fast, does not sell your data, can run the basic programs needed by a "basic computer user" out of the box, is way more capable and adaptable than Chrome OS.

    • @Marcel-dd9ch
      @Marcel-dd9ch Рік тому

      @@Philipp.. But you Linux apps collect and use your data in common linux distributions after a normal installation, until you harden your system. And no, not all Open Source tools are secure. Take logj ss an example.

  • @psi808
    @psi808 Рік тому +3

    If u actually want to give an old pc new life then just install Ubuntu or really any Linux distro

  • @busterj11776
    @busterj11776 Рік тому +1

    Excellent, thanks

  • @JustPyroYT
    @JustPyroYT Рік тому +1

    Great Video!

  • @garethperks7032
    @garethperks7032 Рік тому +17

    Great video! I think Android-x86 or an OS based on it might be a more wholesome desktop experience with more app freedom.

    • @andrejbartulin
      @andrejbartulin Рік тому +2

      I installed Android x86 in VmWare once

    • @GameMaker3_5
      @GameMaker3_5 Рік тому +2

      I believe Remix OS exists which is basically Android x86 with a more desktop friendly GUI

    • @GoogleDoesEvil
      @GoogleDoesEvil Рік тому +2

      Unfortunately, Android is far more locked down than Windows.

  • @cybercub4367
    @cybercub4367 Рік тому +3

    Better to install linux on old devices, it's lightweight, no bloatware, better privacy and security.

  • @encycl07pedia-
    @encycl07pedia- Рік тому +1

    Yeah, the UA-cam "app" is just a PWA (progressive web app). It's basically a bookmark with some added features like notifications. It's running on Chrome's browser engine, but in a separate window from Chrome, like a minor reskin with no options to enter URIs. I'm pretty sure most of the "apps" are PWAs.
    PWAs are better than native apps with website equivalents, IMO. Native apps are heavier and more intrusive/spy-y.

  • @SirenGlitch
    @SirenGlitch Рік тому

    Using the Linux shell VM you can actually run any Linux app and even Windows apps if using bottles/wine/CrossOver/what ever. Crossover is actually better for the chrome OS Linux shell in my opinion but you can use what you want.

  • @BriefNerdOriginal
    @BriefNerdOriginal Рік тому +9

    You can install Linux on any computer since ages. Don't make Alphabet have still a stronger hold onto your data than what they already have. Break free and support open source, open protocols, open formats, and open mind. Plus, nowadays Linux is very easy to install and works great.

  • @lamborghinigamer
    @lamborghinigamer Рік тому +3

    But why would you when normal Linux distributions exist?

    • @Marcel-dd9ch
      @Marcel-dd9ch Рік тому +1

      ChromeOS is much more secure and easier to use for basic computer users. Any Linux applications can do anything with your data in a normal Linux distribution, if you don't do a lot to block that. On top of that, ChromeOS has sandboxes for everything. With Linux, you may use Flatpak, to reach the same level of security.

  • @marshall3412
    @marshall3412 Рік тому +2

    i installed chrome os flex beta on an old hp 2000 notebook pc and it works very well 7.5/10

  • @josel.flores4617
    @josel.flores4617 Рік тому

    Great! I can now upgrade my original Pixel Chromebook 2015, which google discontinued a while ago and no longer receives latest ChromeOS builds.

  • @singletona082
    @singletona082 Рік тому +2

    Right now i"m regretting that hte screen on my CR48 died.
    Be interesting to see if Flex would install on it.
    Pity Flex appears to not allow installation of Android Apps. That? honestly would be pretty amazing in terms of breathing life into hardware. I love the ChromeOS Interface, but the inclusion of x86 capible apps? That would open so many possibilities.

    • @fmphotooffice5513
      @fmphotooffice5513 Рік тому

      Great point. I forgot you can install Android on a PC. That might be more flexible than turning the old hardware to a chrome book. Might experiment with that when I have the time...

  • @gurusaran7193
    @gurusaran7193 Рік тому +5

    Kind of good I wouldn't rlly use that but if there was options to add more apps then I would definitely try it
    And yeah I Absolutely Enjoyed the vid good job lol

  • @LordDewi
    @LordDewi Рік тому

    I was hoping someone would cover this. I couldn't figure out the compatability thing. Just need a new flash drive now.

  • @Hey-Malo
    @Hey-Malo Рік тому

    I've been trying and its imposible for me I gave up, but I feel confused about the reason why I cant do it, if it is for my procesosr or my graphics card, or why

  • @nin6246
    @nin6246 Рік тому +4

    Please do some videos on Linux. It may take some time to learn but it's worth it.

  • @MWSfan18
    @MWSfan18 Рік тому +3

    Might do this on my dad's old laptop. Save him from having to shell out hundreds of dollars on a new computer he really only uses for email and some light office work.

    • @kim-hendrikmerk4163
      @kim-hendrikmerk4163 Рік тому +2

      Have a look around linux systems they are far more versatile if up to date apps are important have a look at fedora or if stability is important have a look at debian or look at any forks of both. They can be lighter faster have more apps and are much more customisable.

    • @MWSfan18
      @MWSfan18 Рік тому

      @@kim-hendrikmerk4163 My dad is afraid of starting a nuclear apocalypse just by turning on his system. No way in hell I'm gonna give him a system where you need a masters degree just to launch the web browser.

    • @basilcat3111
      @basilcat3111 Рік тому +2

      @@MWSfan18 What? You don't need a master's degree. Where did you hear that from?

    • @JacobP81
      @JacobP81 Рік тому

      Linux is just as easy as Windows. If he can use Windows he can use most graphical Linux distributions. Put Lubuntu or Kubuntu in it and for most tasks it's just like Windows. Just pin Firefox on the taskbar and he can open the web browser in one click. I installed Linux Mint with Cinnamon on my friends computer (another great easy to use Linux) and she uses it to view photos she takes with her camera with no problem and she was computer illiterate.

  • @Neuralatrophy
    @Neuralatrophy Рік тому

    I wonder if there would be more compatibility if you install on a recognized device rather than Flex Flex.

  • @fluffyspark798
    @fluffyspark798 Рік тому +1

    Today I actually just put manjaro Linux on a 2012 MacBook Pro and it works far better than Mac OS. I might try this as well

  • @xE92vD
    @xE92vD Рік тому +4

    Back off, ChromeOS.
    Linux is the OS that is supposed to bring old computers to life again!

    • @richards1708
      @richards1708 Рік тому

      Yes. 2022 Will the the year of the Linux Desktop!

    • @xE92vD
      @xE92vD Рік тому

      @@richards1708 Nah, I'm pretty sure Linux will be more popular once Windows 10's life support ends.
      Windows 11 has too many requirements and I'm sure people are aware of them.

    • @richards1708
      @richards1708 Рік тому

      @@xE92vD I could see that. But still when it comes to compatibility it's crazy how well even current versions of windows works.. I've seen Dos Based systems running on Windows 10!

    • @Marcel-dd9ch
      @Marcel-dd9ch Рік тому

      Don't forget to setup SELinux and your firewall. ChromeOS would be more secure out of the box.

  • @Whising
    @Whising Рік тому +4

    Well for bad computers, ChromeOS will be the best to go for and for school

  • @nicholashoi3155
    @nicholashoi3155 Рік тому

    Running this on my old Dell Latitude amd now it has become my secondary college laptop

  • @Fortuna1
    @Fortuna1 Рік тому

    Can made how install and get more performance in 2011 netbooks with Atom cpu and very old bios system?

  • @cyrilio
    @cyrilio Рік тому +6

    Is this really worth it? Also, request to do a video about browsers. Especially alternatives to ‘data stealing’ chrome.

    • @Florianski
      @Florianski Рік тому +4

      Firefox (and its spinoffs) is pretty much the only good browser left sadly.

    • @ThioJoe
      @ThioJoe Рік тому +1

      If it's an old computer you're not using maybe

    • @kittenzrulz2314
      @kittenzrulz2314 Рік тому +3

      @@ThioJoe At that point Linux would make more sence (especially OpenSuse).

    • @mearetom
      @mearetom Рік тому

      alternatives: librewolf(forked Firefox) Firefox, chromium(open source of chrome. there is more but these are good I know.

    • @kevinwong_2016
      @kevinwong_2016 Рік тому

      @@kittenzrulz2314 why open suse

  • @RealThore
    @RealThore Рік тому +5

    9:45
    I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
    Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.
    Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

  • @patmac
    @patmac Рік тому

    Great video.. tx.. My CB is now out of date for support.. (7 years) can I install new h/d and Chrome o/s to get it back in Googles good graces? Thanks in advance. ;)

  • @dr.tophat
    @dr.tophat Рік тому +2

    Personally I hate ChromeOS and would rather use my old laptop for parts but for the people who do want to reuse an old laptop this is kinda cool

  • @skelebro9999
    @skelebro9999 Рік тому +4

    just use linux mint or antix linux, much better and powerful than chrome os

    • @Marcel-dd9ch
      @Marcel-dd9ch Рік тому +1

      only if you have some Linux knowledge. ChromeOS is much easier to use.

    • @skelebro9999
      @skelebro9999 Рік тому +2

      @@Marcel-dd9ch Yes but gaining Linux knowledge isn't even that hard. But you're right since it's made for schools and stuff.

  • @AbominableHuman
    @AbominableHuman Рік тому +3

    I already don't like Bill Gates snooping in on me, why would I want Google doing it even more than they already do?

    • @barracuda861
      @barracuda861 Рік тому

      Use VPN to help keep your info safe. Plus go change settings so less info is shared.

    • @linuxization4205
      @linuxization4205 Рік тому +3

      @@barracuda861 a VPN doesn't automatically fix everything, quit believing those nordvpn sponsors, normie.

    • @MV60
      @MV60 Рік тому +1

      @@barracuda861 They still get your info, they just know it's coming from a vpn server instead of you, plus they still don't know where I am, on location based pages like google maps or even the ads fed through FB they think I'm either on the other side of town or even in any other state as I've never gotten a local relevant ad ever yet. Hooray to our nbn along with virtual isp's. Also vpn's log everything you do and will hand that info to the authorities with zero resistance as they know where you are and where you go.

  • @chad3328
    @chad3328 Рік тому +2

    Just a note about the list of computer models in the Chromebook recovery utility. All of those aren't computers that Chrome OS Flex will work better on. They're a list of actual Chromebooks and other official Chrome OS devices that run "true" chrome OS which has more features than Flex such as being able to run Android apps. You must select Chrome OS Flex for any computer that is not a real Chromebook or Chrome OS device.

    • @radu1337
      @radu1337 Рік тому +1

      Why? Every OS they ever did is focused on advertising. Just install an honest linux distribution.

    • @chad3328
      @chad3328 Рік тому +1

      @@radu1337 Because this is a video about Chrome OS Flex and not anything else and I was pointing out a small mistake in the video? You can have your gripes about Google's advertising and data collection policies, but that's literally their business. They wouldn't exist at this point in time otherwise. Flex does a great job of what it's meant to do easily. The demographic for it and Linux are not the same.

  • @mateowoetam
    @mateowoetam Рік тому

    Have you tried using adb to sideload apps like the play store?

  • @annonymous3033
    @annonymous3033 5 місяців тому +8

    This is clickbait, the dude said chrome OS its actually chrome OS flex, which doesnt have access to playstore like the real chrome OS

  • @sfox-j
    @sfox-j Рік тому +28

    Who’s still using Windows? EDIT: OMG GUYS THIS WAS A YEAR AGO I DONT EVEN REMEMBER COMMENTING THIS SO STOP COMMENTING ON MY STUPID POST

  • @aimx4
    @aimx4 Рік тому +1

    You can download any linux app on a Intel based Chromebook and the playstore comes pre installed on all Chromebooks some apps downloaded on chrome os playstore will be customized for chrome os

  • @HAKANKOKCU
    @HAKANKOKCU Рік тому +1

    is it uses nouveau display driver as default? then you cant install to some of pcs