Johnny Depp v Amber Heard #25 - (Psychiatrist Dr Spiegel part 1) - Therapist Reaction
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
- Dr. Kirk Honda reacts to the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial.
Become a patron: / psychologyinseattle
Email: www.psychology...
Get merch: teespring.com/...
Dr. Kirk’s Cameo: www.cameo.com/...
Instagram: / psychologyinseattle
Reddit (run by fans): / psychologyinseattle
Twitter: / psychinseattle
Facebook Official Page: / psychologyinseattle
Facebook Fan Page (run by fans): / 112633189213033
TikTok: / kirk.honda
The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®
Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.
Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com
what I hate the most about this is how they love to throw drugs in Johnny's face but NEVER address her alcohol and drug use. she used just as much as him but they skip right over that.
Lets not forget that when Johnny was trying to get clean: she snorted cocaïne right in front of him... smh 'I dont have a cocaïne problem, YOU have, Johnny!' was her excuse, if I remember right.
Exactly
Johnny is on drugs long before Amber heard came into picture
Johnny is a lying narcissistic piece of shit, Amber is borderline secondary psychopath. Learn about the dynamic of a narcissist and a borderline relationship
Initially narcissists mess with borderlines, once a borderline is hurt by a narcissist, borderlines turns into psychopaths starts hurting narcissists, narcissists are cowards they play only mind games very sneaky. Borderlines are emotional once they are tired of narcissists devious behind the door manipulation avoiding and splitting from the borderline that triggers borderlines abandonment issues, borderlines are a narcissists nightmare.
Psychopaths are on another level
I'm so with you. They all "hoped Johnny would get sober" meanwhile her sister is using cocaine with him.
It really bothered me that Amber admitted to using ecstasy and mushrooms and for the wedding called it a “cuddle puddle” (in my opinion to try and make her drug use seem less bad). She used mood and mind altering drugs and they never questioned her memory. I also wish that they would’ve pushed more on Whitney’s drug use. During the staircase incident, she was asked if she was sober and she said she had just woken up and my IMMEDIATE thought was “that doesn’t mean you’re sober. What did you take before bed?”
I have interacted with this Dr a handful of times when he was the consulting inpatient psychiatrist for patients in my unit. Quirky is exactly how I would describe him in real life, Dr. Kirk!
He came across as stigmatizing patients in his testimony, I hope that's not what he's like to his patients and that it was just a court thing.
He came across as dishonest and corrupt, as well as manipulative
He seems nice.. the cross was meant to agitate him
I could’ve sworn the man on the witness stand was an escaped patient and the real Dr. Spiegel was tied up in his basement
@@mellyna1715 I’ve dealt with arrogant doctors before. I would NEVER want one as a therapist. I think he’s a danger to his clients.
In just the short bits of testimony you played here, a number of things that Dr. Spiegel stated as facts were actually allegations made by Ms. Heard, so far unsubstantiated by evidence.
For example, Dr. Spiegel said that he knows that Depp wore an earpiece and had lines fed to him because he was too intoxicated to remember them. However, Depp said that he had music playing through the earpiece & on the occasions when lines were being fed, it was due to the frequent script revisions on Pirates 5.
Dr. Spiegel also stated here that Depp was photographed, "blackout drunk." However, Depp says that those photos were taken by Ms. Heard when he was falling asleep/"on the nod" due to the combination of Roxicodone + other prescribed medications he was taking at the time. While this may seem like a simple difference, I would suggest that there is a tremendous difference between being on prescription opiates & being, "blackout drunk." First, because Dr. Spiegel doesn't have the information required to determine whose story is truthful, but also because there are profound cognitive, somatic & behavioural differences that accrue from being intoxicated on alcohol vs. opiates.
I'm looking forward to seeing your response to how Dr. Spiegel performs under cross-examination.
Dr Spiegel also used Johnnys “Jack sparrow” persona from pirates 1 thru till the later movies to say he had progressively gotten worse over the years. (I’m paraphrasing, mostly bc I was listening while gardening, and I was kind of flabbergasted when I’d realized what that he was comparing Johnny Depp to Jack sparrow as if his part was one in the same to the man)
And he said that Johnny had vomit on him in one of the photos. He gets corrected that it was ice cream, so he apologizes for getting it wrong, he was told it was vomit 🤦🏻♀️ clearly, he was either repeating what he was told, or he wasn’t doing a very good job. It’s very clearly a tub of ice cream in that photo.
@@riana4180 her open bruise kit is also in that picture way on the edge of the foreground (near the black plate, on top of the white pillow). It looks like an open makeup compact.
@@misspickles47, yes, an ACTUAL theater bruise kit, not a color correction palette.
he's playing less and less footage of actual testimony, and just going on rants and stories about himself, every time. he isn't taking it seriously, and when he started playing depp's testimony in 2x speed, it was obvious he wasn't sincere.
Again dr. Honda I have so much respect for you and your content. Thank you for doing these videos.
My cat Scar joined me while I was watching he sat in front of the tv and was watching you so intensely XD He really likes you, Dr. Kirk!
Please oh please do a video on cross examination of Dr Spiegel!! That's when this guy gets really hostile and weird - I can't even watch it all the way through. Dying to see your reactions!! I am really enjoying your coverage of the Depp v Heard trial!! Your explanations seem reasonable and help me make sense of all these conflicting stories. It helps so much to hear your perspective as an experienced psychologist. I also appreciate that you try to see both sides of each person's story and try to empathize with them, rather than rush to judgement. Thank you for all you do!!
IF Dr. Curry was correct in asserting that Dr. Hughes, in contravention of operational and ethical guidelines, administered inappropriate tests, incompetently interpreted the results of those tests, and misrepresented the former's findings then, to use your words, "it's not okay" and the latter should be sanctioned as regards her ability to serve as a forensic psychologist. Sadly, I have no expectation the relevant [licensing] authorities will investigate the issue.
No one should bully anyone online. That said, "They were just doing their jobs" subsumes, and potentially incorrectly so in this instance, the expectation of operationally and ethically compliant behavior, and should not be seen as a defense otherwise.
While I feel dr curry is an ethical forensic psychologist (the most out of all of them in my opinion) and I really like her the most out of them all, objectively I’m a bit skeptical of her assessment of the other side since like the other experts she is hired by one side. It’s hard to tell without looking at the data they are all looking at to confirm what she says :(, she is probably being honest but I’m just skeptical and am taking everything on both sides with a grain of salt.
@@tulip5210 I share your skepticism.
You seem so biased towards believing amber heard it's really sad !!
As a psychologist (different country), I found Dr. Spiegel's testimony highly unprofessional. He relied on other's opinions and rumors, taking these things as fact. Furthermore, he implied a diagnosis that is highly prejudicial and difficult to diagnose, without ever having met Depp.
He also ignored already established diagnoses, specifically ADHD when discussing processing speed and cognition.
Dr Curry testified on rebuttal today and answered some of the questions you previously brought up! It would be great to see that reaction as well as to the other mental health providers that have been on - but thanks for this, this is great!
Yesss we need you reaction
@@peachysoul9136 hahaha, this captures my feeling exactly!!
After her testimony I still have questions about how the MMPI was used to diagnose Heard with borderline and histrionic.
@@GroovyFeminist It wasn't, it was just one tool that she used.
Yes. I instantly thought of dr honda when she mentions the score being above 60, which is some dr honda wonder about.
I'm very happy to hear you talking against online bullying, no matter which side of an issue you identify with. I'm very happy I found your channel, I feel I learn and you transmit many positive healthy messages to the world ❤️🤗 thank you.
32:40 I come from a family of actors and musicians.
My mother was a theater actress for many years. My stepfather is a musician and I am also a musician. My husband is a theater and television actor. My brother is a Director of Photography for Film and Advertising.
I can assure you that the use of ear pices to receive lines of dialogue is very common in this type of work. It's true that there are some super-memory actors who may not need them as much, but wearing them is by no means a sign of cognitive decline or poor memory.
The Assistant Director, one of his tasks is to remind the actors of the dialogues. This is so both in the theater, on television and also in the cinema.
It is known that Johnny Depp, like his training, is also an excellent improviser. And to be able to improvise, both in music and in acting, it is important to react quickly and think of the moment as continuing with the scene smoothly.
It is true that there is scientific evidence that doing several things at the same time is something that is generally difficult, and for some impossible. But it is also proven that people who have musical, acting and dance training develop a cognitive and quick response capacity that stands out from the ordinary. That's why a pianist can play. Because the movement of his hands does not act as a mirror and can dissociate. A choir singer can sing a melodic line and at the same time pay attention to the other voices.
If he can play the guitar and sing at the same time, then he has developed multifunctional attention.
An actor is training to listen, act and respond with great skill.
It is something that is learned, trained.
thank you so much for this comment. Dr. Spiegel intended to make JD look like an idiot. It was humiliating, both for JD and for himself as someone who should do better than that.
And it also came out that he wasn't being fed lines, but music!
A concept that slipped my mind, a symptom for someone on the spectrum, is the need to explain a situation so you understand their reasoning. I hear a lot about how neurotypical people assume that explaining a situation means you're giving an excuse, but to a lot of non neurotypical people, we all say we explain a situation so you understand our thought process. I've always said that I didn't take the best approach to a situation or something along those lines and then explain how I got to that point, because I'm paranoid people will assume I'm giving an excuse or not taking responsibility
This is so very very true! It can get very exhausting, but when I do this, people are often surprised at how logical my conclusions or actions are given my reasoning! Especially with ADHD, there are so many steps and trains of thought involved that it's easy for there to be misunderstandings. But it's not an excuse. If you'll excuse the metaphor, it's like a map to help people find where you ended up.. or a dictionary so that you're speaking the same "language"!
@@elenaalejandra1372 being recently diagnosed with ADHD at nearly 40, comments like yours help me so much. I’m learning more about myself than ever. I know I’m not alone. Thanks for making me feel seen. Have a fantastic weekend! ♥️
@@bubbles9287 Thank you, you too!
And yes, it's so strange how we're all very quiet about these things we do that make us feel like we're the only ones that are having to work so hard to be understood.
Personally, I see the constant need to explain myself as a symptom of masking, rather than a symptom of ADHD. To me, it's a symptom of trying to make people see that I make sense, so it's like pre-emptive defensive masking almost, if that makes sense? I have so many thoughts on ADHD and how it feels! But one of the most overwhelming feelings is like in any given situation, everyone else got an orientation session and I didn't, and I can never quite figure out why I'm lost, and no one else can see I'm lost, just that things aren't quite adding up.
I think this acceptance that we don't fully understand (and that that's okay!) is possibly why so many neurodivergent people communicate more fluently with other neurodivergent people.
YES! I relate to this so much! I have ADHD and autism. My best friend has ADHD and we're both like this :D
YES. ADHD here. I definitely do over explain myself. When people do the same to me, I interpret it in the way that I do it. It’s not an EXCUSE, it is merely an EXPLANATION. Those two are not the same thing.. although they may be more synonymous than pledge vs. donate. 😉
Perfect example: If I’m late for work, I’m point blank going to apologize to everyone and tell them and especially my boss why. I have literally walked in 30 minutes late before and told them “I’m so sorry! I didn’t hear my alarm. I overslept. I’m here now! My bad!” That’s about as far from making excuses as one can get, but that’s how I am with all things and it depending on the situation, it absolutely is taken as me making excuses at times. 🤦🏼♀️
Amber Heard drinking two bottles of wine per day and taking multiple prescription drugs and illegal drugs isn’t talked about much which is ridiculous.
Thank you, most who reference Johnny's drug abuse almost always mention nothing about Amber's... which is odd at the very least
I think the nurse's notes specifically said AH was addicted to cocaine, and she even mentioned scar tissue in her nose which seems like it could be from that. So far there's no reason to believe that she wasn't the one hallucinating (if we accept she's not knowingly lying, which I can't believe at this point).
I think it’s because Johnnys team is trying to make the case that she was deliberate and calculated with her abuse, not that it happened under impairment. Which is why they don’t focus on her substance abuse as much as AH team do, as they’re trying to show the difference between Johnny in the court room vs Johnny on drugs narrative
JD’s team probably doesn’t want to muddy the waters. Given the current cultural shift on how the US views drug use, it better serves JD’s team to stay focused on AH’s actions towards him.
If I remember correctly, the accountant mentioned that Johnny's wine budget increased when they were in a relationship and got reduced significantly, I think there was no budget for wine at all, when they divorced. And they didn't want to bring in the illegal drugs on his side because both of them did illegal drugs anyway.
There were some witnesses even on Amber's side that implied that his erratic behavior started when he met her so if they jury caught that, I think they can come to the conclusion that Amber worsened his addiction issues.
I know they didn’t bring this up about him but Johnny Deep does have ADHD. So can we actually say the drugs are the reason he couldn’t remember the words-I am 42 with ADHD and I might actually struggle remembering all of them.
Dr Shaw's testimony in response to Dr Spiegel was top notch
Seemed like such a good man
can you even imagine those two showing up to the same psychiatry conference? Dr. Shaw seemed offended on behalf of the profession and nothing short of disappointed in his colleague
@@rosestewart1606 In my mind I imagine Dr Shaw trying to pretend he doesn't see Dr Spiegel, while Dr Spiegel trying to approach Dr Shaw and confront him for questioning his professionalism 😅
Yes, his explanation of the Goldwater Rule was particularly good. Dr. Spiegel basically implied it was for politicians and outdated. Dr. Shaw explained how it had been re-evaluated, re-affirmed, and expanded over time and the very specific exceptions to it. He also made it very clear that Dr. Spiegel COULD have testified while respecting the rule but chose not to.
We stan our British people on this trial lol.
But fr he was delightful as hell.
Regarding reviews: most people who take their time to write a review are the ones who like to complain or who are extremely satisfied. People who are happy with the service, like regular happy, don’t usually write reviews.
That's why I go out of my way to write good reviews
@@MoonWomanStudios 🥇
Thing is, I'm happy to write good reviews for anyone who does a decent job, EXCEPT a therapist, it'd just be too personal to have my therapy experiences out there online forever. Unless I could be anonymous, but I'm assuming these sites require some kind of verification... Although now that I'm writing it I realize they obvs don't or people couldn't review bomb. Which makes the whole thing even crazier. And the story about his colleague is so so sad and deeply upsetting.
One more question for you, Dr. Honda, regarding the possible role of histrionic traits:
I heard that the Hicksville trip was meant as a birthday celebration for Mr. Depp. If that is true, and Ms. Heard does indeed have traits of histrionic disorder, isn't it consistent with a pathological need for attention to instigate a fight and create a fictitious story of abuse that puts you at the center during someone else's celebration?
Could the same thing be said about her retroactive allegations of sexual abuse when Mr. Depp's finger was cut off in Australia?
Or the supposed abuse LAPD saw no signs of on the emotionally significant day in May 2016 when Mr. Depp stopped by to pick up belongings prior to their divorce only ONE DAY after his mother's death?
Johnny was sober for years at a time during their relationship. He didnt have a problem getting off. He has a problem staying off. Until Amber left. All of his problems started in 2009/2010 according to testimony. He met Amber that year.
And I'm guessing it didn't help that all her friends and family who live in his house are drug users. And she planned a wedding with time set aside for drugs but just for her and her friends. And ordered wine, even though she wanted him sober.
Is weird. If I don't do drugs and I have a partner that struggles with drugs and alcohol, celebration or not, I'm having a non alcoholic wedding and I'm never having anyone do drugs around him or I'm his presence. And I'm not inviting those ppl to live with me.
He said that he saw photos of Johnny passed out drunk. How do you know that's what it was from? It's a picture, it doesn't tell you what caused him to be passed out. You can't even know for sure if it's passed out or just fallen asleep. Even if you can tell it was passed out, you still don't know if it's from drinking or a lengthy period without sleep or one of a million other possible causes.
And he said there was a "vomitus" photo of him passed out, except it's the photo of him holding the melted ice cream, not with vomit.
I don't even know why anyone brought those pictures.
That's her best evidence 🤣
@@denisedelgiudice3378 lol right? I feel like amber would have a better case if there were no pictures, including her kinda sorta bruises
As I understand it, actors can work 16+ hours a day!
I’d be tired too!
The only people I think you can ethically "diagnose from afar" are fictional characters. Because they are not real you cant sit down and talk with them directly in person. IE: you could arguably diagnose Jack Sparrow, but not Jhonny Depp.
Dr. Kirk! Your videos have really changed my view on personality disorders. You are definitely breaking the stigma that surrounds them. I have a question for you, can you have abandonment issues/strong fears of being left or abandoned and CPTSD without having borderline? The more you describe borderline the more confused I am about my own struggles with CPTSD that came from my parents divorce and my mother moving us away from our father at a young age. I developed abandonment issues because I always felt like my father left us and even though as an adult now I understand that wasn’t exactly the case I still struggle to this day with the fear of people closest to me leaving or being taken from me.
Yes. I have abandonment issues and not borderline though it makes me wonder.
I have mild CPTSD, and don't have borderline (per several people knowledgeable on the topic). I tend to internalize my anger, which as unhealthy as extermalizing anger and pain.
I support you I too have CPTSD from abuse starting at the age of about 2: 1/2. And I don't have borderline and all the other things it is straight up CPTSD which I didn't even know existed. Send me to a specialist on borderline adult ADHD and something else I spent hours taking tests he could clearly see that I had CPTSD. First time hearing the letters. I was so hyper vigilant that I got every answer right which highly improbable. Unless you're overwhelmed with fear that 1 wrong answer could explode your life. From the testimony that I know is effectual I think Johnny has it too. It's severe trauma you heard him testify about his mom. Devil's advocate yeah the booze and drugs did help him feel better because he was able to disassociate I understand that. But in actuality it's only making things worse.
Hi. That`s a good question. I wondered the same thing. I had a very chaotic childhood with a very mentally unstable mother that was very traumatising. I have huge abandonment issues in romantic relationships and often feel unwanted or unloved. I feel like I have to give to others while receiving little back. I was diagnosed with General Anxiety Disorder and disorganised attachment. I have maintained my empathy I do have very stable, loving friendships which have lasted decades. I remember one therapist said that the difference between disorganised attachment (with abandonment issues) and borderline is that being borderline will affect every part of your life whereas disorganised attachment affects is usually limited to romantic or very intimate relationships. I`m interested in what Dr Honda will say.
They can look very similar at times! From my experience as a therapist, the difference that I see is with anger and stability of relationships. Usually there will be more inappropriate anger, sometimes aggression with Bpd and instability across most if not all relationships. With cptsd you can experience relationship issues but there is often less expressions of anger/aggression and more self awareness.
Doesn’t Johnny Depp have adhd so that would effect his assent ion and memory
I feel like it may be worth pointing out that this person described themselves as a generalist psychiatrist with no qualifications for testifying in the role of a forensic specialist and arguably little qualifications to give opinions/diagnoses on intimate partner abuse. Hence the people having a strong reaction to the ethical issues at play. Also, there was an awful lot of very generalising if not offensive statements coming from him during that testimony that could have offended people with ADHD and a number of other individuals as he was inflicting there is inherent abuse (not just correlative) linked to disorders they may be identifying with. I am not saying this justifies online bullying in any form (because it clearly doesn't!), but personally, I can see how people may be terrified by the thought of a person with such opinions treating people and I can at least see why they would want to report his statements based on the said ethical issues.
16:06 Dr Kirk "This guy is a little quirky"
You have no idea dear KH 🤣 can't wait for the cross examination reaction
The creepy thing about black-outs is that this can also be exploited by an abusive person to gaslight and make a person believe they've done something they haven't, so it's really delicate in this case.
Absolutely!
The creepy thing about raging alcoholics and coke heads who feel comfortable with misogynistic degrading of their partner in conversations with their friends, including calling them whores and talking about raping and killing them, is that they often be abusive in their relationships.
Per a technician's testimony, he fed music and rewrites into JD's earpieces. Per a vanity fair article 4 years ago, they were feeding sound fx to add an additional layer for his acting. It just sounds like he's been able to incorporate earpieces in different ways. Either AH's team fed him bad info (like when he called ice cream vomit) or he's in with them cherry picking horse droppings.
I like to watch your commentary on this case, but the way you asserted that the alleged cavity search probably happened was a bit too much to me. Of course, I have seen the rebuttal witness that worked at the trailer park that night and we have no other witnesses testifying to Depp having psychotic episodes after taking coke as far as I know. I am also pretty sure that there is no evidence of him taking coke that night. Anyways, I'll be taking a break
Yeah he should only speculate in favor of Depp like his cult does online. Maybe send the good dr links to the many conspiracy theories about how AH is a lying succubus 😂
@@bpark3726 I don't know what happened. My comment is about how I felt about that certain comment
I'm willing to believe that Johnny had a problem with alcohol but what I do struggle with is that they have recorded their conversations and this is never brought up. Like, whenever Johnny is saying "you did this or that to me", Amber doesn't contradict him or say "well but you were trying to k1ll me" or "but you did so and so"... or at least I didn't hear any of that? The only evidence I've seen are pictures of him sleeping, so he could be the type of guy who drinks until he passes out, has a problem with alcohol but isn't aggressive while intoxicated... I don't know, I just feel like there isn't any consistency with her testimony. If she recorded so much and took so many pictures, why not ask him about certain things while recording or take pictures of her worst injuries? I understand that a victim might not ask certain questions for safety reasons, but she doesn't sound scared during the recordings. This is why I find it hard to believe her story...
Last week I heard them tell in the court the recordings were for counseling purposes
it seemed like his problem was more opiates then alcohol from how things were presented, but I'm not sure.
Amber actually speaks about Johnny being physically violent to her in a few audios, and he never denies this
@@tulip5210 This is how I saw it too, but I'm guessing opiates would just make him sleepy so they're talking about alcohol which could possibly make him violent or forget what he might have done.
@@angelacanedit Oh I might have missed it, I'll look into it! Thank you.
It's rather frustrating to see you saying it's a "he said she said" thing when there are 4 hours and more recordings of them 2 during their relationship and the content of these discussions are pretty clear in showing the dynamics and what actually happened. and you say psychiatrists might judge from afar a murderer.. no, that never happens. This Spiegel guy not only diagnosed from afar but I have no idea how he could get to his conclusions with what's available. Maybe watch the rebuttal psychiatrist for more info on this guy's lack of ethics.
Also, would love to see your analysis of the 4hour audio of them arguing. You'll see the only thing she EVER reproaches him is to leave and go to a bathroom as soon as a fight erupts. If this is consistent with abuser behavior I don't understand anything anymore.
I got Doc Brown vibes too! Mixed with the eagle muppet!! 🤣 He's quite the character.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 Eagle muppet, thats perfect!
I got Boris Karloff too 😂
As someone with ADHD, I would probably have forgotten the three words within 30 seconds, never mind 5 minutes :') . That this is evidence of anything, especially since Depp was apparently diagnosed with ADHD, baffles me.
I don't know if Dr. Honda is aware but Depp has been diagnosed with ADHD (I believe a pretty sever case) which would also have contributed to many of the things Dr. Spiegel attributed to substance abuse, cognitive impairment, and narcissism.
I'm thinking they've never bought that up even though there's been moments where I'm like ahhh why aren't you saying it, because if he brings a diagnosis in it means he'd have to be properly assessed as well
This is exactly why a psychologist shouldn't be diagnosing anyone without knowing everything about their record and talking to them.
The story sounds real because she stole that story. Dr. Honda, I know you don't like to take sides and give the benefit of the doubt but what if she is lying? What if all the horrific shit is made up? What would that do to somebody to know that such lies are being told about you, and people believe them.
But what if they are true? What if that's what happened and the whole world insists in revictimizing you over and over again? See how this works both ways? True empathy is not selective. None of us really know what hapoened to these ppl, they are strangers and we should keep that in mind before going overboard and starting crusades online.
I understand Dr. Honda's comments about Depp's substance use but I have to say that, as someone who is VERY familiar with alcoholics, Amber has some strong, classic signs of potential alcohol abuse as well. I think it is being ignored because Depp's alleged substance abuse is part of Heard's case and Heard's alleged abuse isn't part of his case.
Yes, no one addresses her 2 bottles of red wine daily and her addiction to mdma as well as her occasional use of cocaine as problematic. Only JD is evil and a perpetrator of ipv, dv, and sa due to same said drug use. It's completely hypocritical. I wish they would truly go in-depth about the fact that opiates were prescribed to him as a painkiller, so he didn't seek them out, and then became addicted bc oxycontin etc are designed to be addictive and become ineffective so that its victims OD. The Sackler family that owns oxycontin etc were convicted and found guilty of creating a drug they knew to be both addictive and deadly. Additionally, the Dr that prescribed those to JD is guilty of malpractice for prescribing a known addictive drug to someone known to have trauma-based substance addictions.
Yes! And because I guess if you do sommelier training, your 1-2 bottles of wine a day habit suddenly becomes normal.
I think IO or Josh stated that she is immune to the effects of drinking or doing drugs. That to me sounds like they are minimizing the issues she has.
I think the entire world understands they are both drug abusers. They are so childish, both Depp and amber. It’s highly irresponsible. Dangerous. And selfish. There should be no space for weakness or forgiveness when it comes to that.
Yes, I thought about that immediately when he described how in the beginning of their relationship she would insist on him drinking a glass of wine every evening when coming home. That's such a classic with alcoholics, masking their problem by making others drink.
I just don't agree with the idea that because he abused drugs, he is probably an abuser. That seems like a very unfounded assertion for a mental health professional to make. To me, Dr. Curry comes across as the only trustworthy expert on Johnny and Amber's potential mental health issues. She don't over-reach and pretend to know things about what actually happened between them.
I'm so excited for this reaction! Thank you for doing it now and not sticking to the chronology of the trial, I couldn't wait for this one 😁
And for not chopping it up into a million unsatisfying pieces!
The only evidence presented of blackout is Amber Heard's claims. Dr. Speigel is basing his diagnosis on her specious claims, which to me seems very unprofessional. It would be really interesting to see you react to his cross-examination where many of his unorthodox methods come to light.
There are also texts of him admitting to blacking out, as well as causing problems while drunk. From the way people are discussing these issues, it doesn't seem they watched his cross-examination.
I have a friend who is in her mid 30’s. I know that she would absolutely not remember a single one of those words. She doesn’t abuse substances and never has. It’s due to trauma. So you can’t definitively say that JD’s memory is poor because he was on substances.
Johnny Depp testified that he has never been intoxicated while filming, not even that one film which you talked about earlier, one that use substance abuse as a joke. Also, the mini mental status exam was done a day after he had landed back from aus/eu, I don't know if he was high at the time, and in the doctors notes, only the problem area was noted, not the whole MMSE. Johnny's sound technician testified that the in-ear fed did feed him his lines in one movie, but in most other they would play music so that he could stay in character. So basically Ms. Heard's team has been misrepresenting facts and testimony from this trial to fit their narrative which sounds so problematic to me. Like if you are telling the truth then you don' need to do all this.
I loved that the first thing that came to Dr. Honnda's mind was Johnny's state when he did the test. It's telling me that this is a question any good psychologist would consider.
@@toonmili03 definitely . I used to administer this test on elderly clients and thats absolutely the first thing that you check. Orientation. If the "clients orientation is off then we note it down.
36:15 I 100% agree with you, Dr. Honda. No need to spread hate. Supporting Johnny is one thing, but blindly attacking anyone that is against him or even just speaking objectively - not cool. Thank you, Dr. Honda. I wish world was filled with people like you.
I completely agree!
100%
I wasn't pro either of the, in fact considering what average ppl go thro they're both quite entitled. What gets me is the way he set out to destroy heard and those messages read out in court yesterday I found repellant. Stuff like that fuels the online hatred against heard and anyone who isn't 100% pro depp
@@bereal6590 True. And on top of everything, they are both actors and I just find it very hard to believe that there isn’t at least a good portion of acting on both sides.
@@bereal6590 If your abuser tried to destroy you by calling you an abuser, wouldn't you try to shut them down, too? He's not a saint, but what he says is supported by the evidence. What she says is not.
this guy is saying amber heard was believable. okay, time to unsub. no way would any sane person register her statements as fact, with the evidence provided
Pleas unsubscribe from all of YT for the good of humanity while you’re at it 😆
@@bpark3726 are you triggered ?
Pointing out Johnny's memory issues just makes his testimony that much more believable. He would have easily tripped up on the details of his experiences, if it was in fact fabricated, if he couldn't even remember a few words during a test or his lines for a part. How would he remember a fake story with such horrific details and deliver it so convincingly? It seems unlikely.
They would also lend credence to the idea that he could be a victim. I have neurological damage associated with prolonged abuse and chronic anxiety.
@@kimberlyanne8549
Agreed!
I'm sorry you had to go thru that you did.
Take Care
💜
He does trip up a lot. For example, his cross-examination (bot of them). It's fascinating that the public doesn't seem to notice.
@@mobwatch8119
Please tell me where JD "tripped up a lot."
I would like to know what you're referencing, so I can re-watch his testimony and see what you're talking about.
Thanks
It does?
Omg this Spiegel guy sounds like if Shayne from Love is Blind smoked about 5 packs a day.
oh my god youre right i cannot unhear that now
can you explain how an alleged heavy cocaine user that's prone to psychotic breakdown haven't had any claimed abuse/violence against him since he teens, until AH shows up?
it is possible, but pretty low probability of the cavity search actually happening, IMO
NDA
Can’t wait til part 2 - I hope he covers when Spiegel has to address calling Johnny an idiot and when he asked if he really had to answer a question he didn’t want to 🤦♀️
We are going to need a “yikes” counter for that!
Thanks for listening to your fans. I know you have a real life!
Thanks!
Wait, isn't leaving false reviews a form of libel and defamation? Isn't that what this whole case is about? Irony?
Don’t ask Depp cultist to be logical on this lol
You know I love your content in general but it blew me away when you said that it seemed very believable that Johnny would perform a cavity search on Amber because she said it & because of the amount of drug use she has accused him of. Wow. I am years into recovery & have been through the most desperate of times regarding needing drugs and alcohol - I would NEVER do that, and I find it very disheartening that you think it's believable just because she said it. Wow. Many addicts get desperate, but most addicts do not sexually violate someone to get drugs. Wow.
I sent you a Tweet about this too. I really hope you can address this is in an upcoming video & take some time to think about how much you are or are not allowing *Amber Heard's* account of Johnny's drug use to influence your opinions of what Johnny has done or is capable of doing. I suspect Johnny also felt that he had to try to downplay his struggles with addiction because he KNEW how Amber would try to use it against him in order to discredit his recollection of events. It's disgusting.
Last thing - there is no record evidence (in response to your question @ end of video). "Record evidence" are the pictures of Johnny sleeping, an audio file of him vomiting, & an audio file of him moaning. That's part of what makes Dr. Hughes and this doctor so unethical - they are taking Amber's accounts of things and twisting them into facts. It's so wildly problematic.
This channel is so incredibly biased against JD. Taking the (often contradictory) statements from AH as fact. He doesn't seem to be able to objectively comment about JD due to his biases
@@mandalynn1384 I disagree based on his general commentary - I think he has made a great effort to analyze things from the perspective of depp telling the truth & from the perspective of heard telling the truth. But this blew my mind. Hoping the jury finds her testimony less believable than he did...
But that's you. I know a case where an alcoholic man raped a woman when she was working as a cleaner in a home family. And I know that because I lived in that home and happened when my mother and I weren't there. The victim didn't denounce him because who is going to believe a young poor woman who did that job to feed her kids? And the same man tried to force my mother to have sexual intercourse when she was terminal ill with cancer. Your experience is not the general rule. Drunk men can commit sexual abuse like it or not. It is a reality.
I hate bullying. All the bullying that’s going on against anyone in this case, especially Amber is absurd. I’m not “team” Amber but I would never say anything mean. Bullying is childish. You gain nothing by putting someone else down
Yeah even dressing up as poo or saying they want to microwave her baby? It’s honestly so awful and vile, I don’t know how people think it’s okay behaviour towards someone else.
@@infairvarona I'm not sure there's been any evidence the baby thing was actually said. But yeah, I totally agree with your sentiment. So much energy funneled into hate- it's awful.
All's I'm saying, my top 3 picks for MY therapist from this trial: 1) Dr. Curry; 2) Ben King the House Manager; 3) The other British guy who pleasantly explained all the words he spoke on rebuttal.
Dr Shaw really was very pleasant 😄
I’ve been waiting for the reaction to this doctor’s testimony! He was definitely spicy. Lol
That's putting it mildly!! 🤣
I want to see him watch the cross examination.
Day 185,920,484,039 that Dr Kirk Honda is the best human on this planet. Still encouraging everyone to be kind no matter the situation.
What about Amber taking Ambien and drinking at the same time? That also makes you actually drive a car, and the only thing you remember is going to bed.
I just find it odd that in the audio that both they both recorded she admits to hitting him but we never hear him say he has. He didn’t even know she was recording at times. Even the therapist who was through zoom said Heard only accused him of being physical when he wasn’t around when Depp’s team questioned her. Heard is on recordings admitting to being physically abusive and saying he tries to get away when an argument is happening. Did he finally snap at some point after years of hiding and being hit? Maybe, but wouldn’t that still make him the victim and her the abuser?
Exactly!
she accuses him of hitting her in several audios though and he doesn't deny it either, so idk
@angela g she only accuses him on recording when he wasn’t there. So how was he supposed to deny it if he wasn’t there? I’ve listened to all the audio tapes and when they’re together she admits to hurting him and calls him a baby for “cowering away” and never fighting back. Recordings of him begging her to stop getting physical and her saying she can’t promise that. There’s also a recording in Australia where she admits to trashing the place and cutting off his fingers and her freaking out cuz she thinks he’s going to leave her now. The audio points to Amber being the abuser not Johnny
@@angelacanedit anytime she accused him he very much denies it or corrects her. like when she says something like you hit back so don’t complain he says I pushed you and she goes on to say she doesn’t want to get into semantics. I wonder why.
@@angelacanedit I think in one he admits to pushing her but that could be he pushed her to get away from her. Also in another one he hits her foot with the door from the shower but sounds like an accident.
The devil works hard but Dr. Kirk works harder
Dr Grande found out that the three word test was asked 5 minutes after and it should have been asked after one exercise after which would be around a minute. Johnny's lawyers also proved that he used the ear piece for music not to have lines given to him.
Yup! It's amazing how much other talk and activity can happen in 5 minutes.
I would be interested to see the data about this 5-minute thing.
And.. some clinicians delay the recall moment even longer.
Or maybe, I doubt it, but maybe he does have a sh*t memory, doesn’t mean he hit anyone.
That's true but his own previous psyche found the same issue with cognition and memory
Why doesn't Dr. Kirk also preface that the similar issues Johnny is facing due to drug abuse is *ALSO* applicable to Amber Heard as well?
She abuses alcohol *and* illicit drugs, so why didn't he mention this potentially being possible for *both* of them? From his videos that I've seen so far, he very seldom even mentions Amber's drug abuse.
I like his overall take but it's this particular point that leaves me very perplexed. One of the things that I enjoy about Dr. Kirk's take on things is the fact that he thinks so dynamically and [usually] acknowledges the nuance and complexity of things [whenever applicable].
I'm just kind of shocked to see him not so that [as much] with this particular case.
I have autism spectrum disorder and I felt so bad for this Dr ... Everyone was laughing while he was speaking and people in comments calling him whacky and a psych patient .. he's definitely just on the spectrum as a lot of professors etc are
We can't know that without an official diagnosis, so let's not speculate. And whether he has autism or not, his testimony was extremely unprofessional.
The MMSE is supposed to be a screening tool, not a diagnostic tool, isn't it? That's how I always used it as an LCSW... Right now as a person with depression, I likely would show deficits on the MMSE because my thoughts are so foggy. 🤷♀️
I am so sorry you suffer from depression. I have had clinical depression forever although once I found the right meds I have been so much better. I hope you are getting treatment and feel better soon. It can be a debilitating illness. 💕
It was one of many evals that the forensic psych used to make her assessment of AH
This guy was highly unethical though. And Dr. Hughes did so bad they used him to kind of fix it but it made it worse. If you listen to Dr. Curry she really is in the middle stating the facts where these witnesses have a definite bias
No she does not lmao. She is just better at pretending she does. That's how she fools ppl like you who are biased.
@@Akmong1988 i actually was on Amber's side till I heard the evidence ect. And that's what changed my mind. I was very unbiased, and she is in the middle, especially after today
@@Akmong1988 yes she is your just mad because she is just way more professional than those idiots that think they can know what happened by watching mr.depp on his films or the sexiest that think that females are always a victim .
@@Akmong1988 i don’t care about either side and I can tell that her “experts” are all unprofessional and rude even 😂, anyone with a pair of eyes and ears and common sense would see that.
@@FabiolaRVela I don't care about neither myself. And I can tell you I only made a reference to dr Curry not other experts on neither side. Anyone with a pair of eyes and ears and common sense would see that!!
Stop saying “there’s no way to know”
It’s invalidating and belittling the people who have spent years researching this case. A case you just heard about and got into during this trial. It comes off as being soooo dismissive of any critique to Amber Heard. Then you squeak in at the last possible second “could she also be lying? sure”
You completely ignore the affects this can have on male survivors and how male survivors don’t always present the same way most women survivors do. I just wish there was more compassion for the actual victim.
Amber Heard's former colleague has posted a video saying that her cocaine habit is worse than she has admitted. I'll fetch it and share in your thread where you requested
JD admitted having substance abuse issues and was seeking treatment for it while still married to AH. IMO DR Speigal diagnosed based on lies (a photo AH took) where Dr. Spegal was told that ice cream was vomit, watching JDs movies where Depp was playing a character, and ignoring the Goldwater Rule.
The fact that AH went out of her way to misinform Dr. Spiegal leads me to be more inclined to believe JD.
I love your videos! Could you possibly make your endings just a tad bit longer? I often have automatic play activated and only remember to like the video once I hear you wrapping up. But theres no time to like it before it switches to the next one!
And that’s his issue? Why don’t you just like the video as soon as you start listening. Then your whole problem is solved.
I usually wait until I hear something I need to or something super important then smash the like button. It simplifies things lol or add it to a playlist and if you save it you can like and delete it later
@@Whitey2716 Exactly.
@@Whitey2716 @Christie Wright lol, it was a suggestion hes free to take or not. You would probably do well in watching his other videos on healthy communication. Best of luck.
Half way through this video and I can't believe you can take anything Amber says about Johnnie as truth. If you believe what she says without any facts, then he is guilty. All other witnesses, report different facts about him. He doesn't show up for work drunk, if he did that, he wouldn't have any work. He isn't fed lines by earphones, it is actually music to relax to. He has never physically attacked any woman. Can't listen to you believing the liars.
I would not be able to remember three words - I have ADHD and my short term memory is pretty bad.
My long term memory is also affected (when studying) by my autism 👍🏻
So would that mean this guy would diagnose me with substance abüse? (I have no medication for my ADHD)
Yep mine is if I get hit with a few things at once, or distracted by nerves, or overthinking. Yet something I’m into -it’s weirdly specific and can waffle on reeling off lots of things. That inconsistency he would probably diagnose as sub abuse too.
I have read that Johnny Depp has ADHD 😉
I've read in many places that JD has had both ADHD and depression as prior diagnosis.
@@1wolsk people get wrongly diagnosed all the time especially narcissists because they’re always lying and protecting their true self.
My friend is a narcissist diagnosed with ADHD
@@goodtimesbadtimes5273 So you're saying you know a narcissist who also has ADHD.... how would that make Johnny's ADHD diagnosis wrong?
Also, a lot of the traits Spiegel discusses are common ADHD traits.
I disagree with you strongly. AH claims to have filmed him while drunk because he could not remember. For a narcissist and histrionic like her he was the perfect victim as she could tell him anything next morning. Funny that not ONE video or voice tape proves he was violent to her. She so much wanted him to hit her to get his money. So, look at the evidence and look up histrionic PD again. I am no fan of JD but the victim of a covert narcissist. It took me 12 yrs to recover and find myself again.
9:00 What exactly was the evidence that JD was physically abusive?
Testimony of witnesses is evidence, photos are evidence, recording where he said he head butted her etc
Isn't memory loss also symptom of going through emotional abuse? I couldn't remember anything during the end of my mom's verbal abuse. I was a zombie.
Speaking of reviews: my husband had a similar-ish experience and was faced with the same problem...when you can't ask people to fill out a survey or review, the only ones who do are typically the ones with something bad to say. He worked as seller support for Amazon and the main metrics for his job performance was based on the reviews/surveys the callers filled out after the call. But they were also banned from asking the client from completing the surveys. So inevitably the only ones who completed the surveys were the ones who were frustrated...and 99% of the time they were frustrated with Amazon rules/operating procedures, and not with him or his service (he works in sales now and clients love him...he's super personable and never had an issue with being well received by clients/public). Each week they took the bottom 25% of that groups scores and put them on a PIP. If your score was within the bottom 25% for your small group for 3 weeks in a row you were fired. He did end up getting fired and it was one of the hardest things we went through...as I was still in college and not pulling in much money (he got fired 2 nights before finals, so that was also very stressful on me and my study efforts). It's sad that reviews can literally determine one's job and even more sad that the good interactions he had with clients were completely overlooked because he couldn't ask them to fill out the survey if they were satisfied with their service.
I have adhd. If someone asked me to remember three words it would matter what I was doing for those 5 minutes to whether I remembered them or not. I will be counting how many tsp of salt I’m putting into my cooking and will lose count because a noise distracts me or a thought and it’s gone 😂 So, idk how effective a test like that would be. Im sure Jd has abused for a long time and may be suffering consequences for it but 🤷🏻♀️ js
this!! i literally just posted a comment about how no one said johnny has adhd because i have adhd too and when i was watching it that was my first thought and i kept hoping it would be mentioned in cross but it never was
When he said that I was like um….. my adhd would screw me over yup
Adhd here too. I have the same issue with rembering. I working in a Podiatry and rembering what the patient say to me while the telephone rings leave me overwhelmed. Sometimes i starting the same question 3 times or more
Same! I'm ADHD and I have a terrible memory as well. I don't think I'd pass the that test either.
I thought I heard mentioned that he also has adhd? No?
patiently waiting for Dr K to get to Amber 😬
That’s the most important one and he’s skipping it. Making me anxious hahaha
I'm sure based on his commentary thus far that he is going to do the same thing he's done with everyone else: stay very neutral, talk more about abuse and drug use and how that impacts people.
@@0utfoxed probably but still just want his input
honestly same
Does that psychiatrist looks like he's on some substance abuse after he was asked about Willy Wonka 🤣?
Dr Spiegel has the mannerism that he studies substances a lil too more hands on.
In my head I keep on accidentally calling him Dr SMEAGOL (and sometimes.m, not so accidentally 🤭)
I didn't find Amber believable at all. Maybe it's because I have watched all of the trial and have seen the non existent evidence and people testifying to her lies. Or her back track her own lies, I don't know.
I really don't like this thing of mutual abuse. Because there is evidence that she did abuse him and her evidence doesn't really exist, it's mutual abuse. Had he actually been the abuser, any violence by her would be reactive or defensive and seen as okay. I really see a lot of sexism.
If he presented the evidence she did, we would not have believed the evidence. Just a couple of examples -
Three of his friends or family testify with earily the same story, that would be seen as them being in cahoots and fabricating.
Them living in flats with his friends and family all around that had access to their apartment anytime they wanted, he would be seeing as isolating her.
Having a birthday party for her with only his friends and none of hers, isolating.
Police testifying that they saw no injuries on him or damage to the apartment, we would believe their bodycam and testimony, there wouldn't be any doubt that any photos he brought later would be fabricated and staged.
Him taking pictures of her sleeping or recording her, would be seen as creepy.
Him following her when they fight and she goes to a bathroom, would be seen as aggressive.
Say that louder for the people in the back, because, here! We have the perfect description of the double standard the society always critic outside but still idolised inside!!! You are so right!!! And that’s why I hope this trial will bring more attention to it and makes society realise that men can be victims and there’s manipulative women who will lie for their own benefit even if they destroy another human being life! It’s not because it’s a woman that we have to believe her and categorises the man as the abuser! It’s with evidence and testimonies and proofs that the victim and the abuser will be revealed! 🙌🏻☺️
Thank you dr Honda for having a no bullying policy!! It’s not ok to harass anyone in the “real world”
It’s not okay to harass ppl online either
@@bpark3726 absolutely!
I commented to a friend on the very first day of this trial that wow JD appears to have potential cognitive or communication issues. I’m a speech pathologist and work with brain injured people all the time including brain injury related to substance abuse. I’ve given the MMSE before (again it’s more of a screening tool). I would say just informally listening to him speak he seems to have delayed thought processing and thought formulation, frequent disfluencies (stuttering) and maybe some word finding issues. If you listen to him speak when he was in his 20s he did not talk like this. The way he talks is simply not typical. Could he be currently under the influence or just nervous or something else? Sure, I’m certainly not diagnosing him, nor am I saying he’s a wife beater. He comes across pretty truthful and likable on stand. That said I’d be shocked if his brain hasn’t suffered from the substance abuse, and I can’t imagine this wouldn’t impact him professionally. Acting obviously has a pretty high cognitive demand. I could certainly believe a major studio wouldn’t want to risk casting him if he can’t perform anymore. The whole thing is very sad.
Interviews with him away from this trial are quite different.
They way he speaks reminds me a lot of my partner, who has told me he prefers take his time speaking to ensure the words he chooses reflect accurately what he wants to say…. Although it’s not how he speaks all the time.
I think he has to be extremely careful with his words. Beyond just his own desire to be accurate, after 6 years of taking a beating in the press, every word is put under the microscope and magnified and he knows that well. I think a life in the public eye as an introvert would cause carefully chosen words in court especially.
Or he displays signs of ptsd from abuse. The way he talks reminds me much more of someone stressed by the situation and coping with emotions.
I'm on the fence with this. While he does talk slow during direct questions, he was very fast with his quips or when arguing. So my impression is that he's very careful with responses so they don't get misconstrued, but feels much safer talking about stuff that's not directly connected to this case.
All of his remarks like "you keep reading them right", "I guess they were hearsay papers", "you'll be all right", etc came up in a pretty normal pattern.
If he really was abused, it could simply be that he doesn't want to recall these events due to emotional distress.
Without personal interaction and assessment, it's really difficult to say.
its funny you say dont give the man negative reviews after reading this from 3 years ago, "Dr. spiegle killed my step father, my step father was suicidal and an alcoholic, he was a patient for years and medication was just thrown at him. after rehab dr never followed up or returned calles. we called stating he was locked in a room and suicidal and still he never called back, when he finally did call and say he would follow up he again never did. now my step father is dead. speigle does bare minimum treatment to push meds and doesnt care if you die or not." this was a review from a patient way before any court stuff even started to happen. That being said i agree dont review bomb his shit, let actual reviews speak for themselves.
I saw that comment, because when I’ve heard about “Johnny’s crazy fans” leaving 1 stars review on him, my curious side took the lead and I went for a mega search. I saw that comment of 3 years ago, but I’ve seen a lot, A LOT, of 1 stars review about him in 2011, 2014, 2015, 2016. People talking about him being egocentric, his lack of caring into the well-being of his patients, and even one said that he doesn’t care at all about the patient, like doesn’t listen to, and has a preconceived idea he sticks with it whatever the patient says….
It’s not new that this psychiatrist receives bad reviews!!
@@tiffepatenaude oh shut up lmao.
The ear piece- that’s not how it was testified. The audio guy testified he listened to music or would sometimes get lines read when he rewrote the same day or within days not something he had time to learned. Just a correction
But please stop going after Johnny and and not pointing the finger at her. She's the one that did it. His substance abuse allowed her to do it with/to him. Not allJohnny substance abuse caused it no. Not an expert but I have heard those tapes and as an abuse victim/survivor that scares me when I hear talk like that.
I am a little confused down the rabbit hole watch this trial and Johnny Depp never said he didn't have a problem. Maybe I missed it.
Now Amber Heard said she never had a problem, and suggestions that she does.
Maybe I miss that too.
Just the observation I'm not on anybody's team. The whole thing sad.
Honestly, some of the things he is talking about Johnny struggling with could also be attributed to adhd. I know I would struggle to remember words five minutes later, especially if I’m having to do other mental tasks. With the forgetting the question, that happens to me too. I will sometimes start to answer and go off on a tangent and then forget what the original question was.
you think a psychiatrist couldn't tell the difference?
And the way he dragged ADHD medication, as though people who need it are using it to get high
@@angelacanedit he didn't examine him directly, he gathered data points from from several sources (some of which are rumors , and his acting) and made a conclusion. wait for the cross, it clarifies a lot
@@EileenGallia exactly! I really didn’t like that. I don’t take my medication for fun, I need it. He just seemed to be very judgmental of any kind of drugs, prescribed or not.
@@angelacanedit psychiatrists are not gods. He is also an expert hired by another team, he has to analyze in their favor, it doesn’t necessarily mean he’s lying but some things can have multiple interpretations and he took the interpretation that benefited the side he was hired by.
The cavity search was likely not true, because she stated that the trailer was demolished. But yesterday the former owner gave his testimony, that only one light was broken and nothing else.
Also she used many drugs in the whole relationship, as many witnesses stated, but this is never taken in account when talked about their relationship….
How is the trailer not being demolished even remotely related to whether the cavity search happened?
@@GroovyFeminist yes, how does finding out she lied about one part of her story impact the credibility for the other parts of her story. Such a stretch there isn’t it 🙄
@@drako8343 There are credibility issues for both parties in this case. Johnny's story about Amber throwing a bottle at his finger was discredited when Dr. Moore testified that the injuries he sustained aren't medically plausible if things happened according to his version of events.
@@GroovyFeminist Well...isnt there audio f.e., where Amber is telling Depp`s doctor right after the incident, that she never meant to hurt him? Also she allegedly admitted to their bodyguard back then, that she threw a bottle, didnt she? ;) Moore wasnt present at the time and saw the injury, while not "really testing" either, if it could have happened. Probably not that easy.^^ It was just speculation by him...far away from being a fact. He didnt even inspect the pictures, which were taken afterwards and show the broken bottles/blood. Further he had the opinion, that it couldnt have happened how it was described, but he didnt rule out the possibility, that the injury could have been caused by a wodka bottle.
Making assumptions about he said she said testimony is unwise. Assuming that all alcoholic and drug abusers are violent is a mistake. Both my parents were abusers. They rarely fought even verbally. My dad had PTSD from WW2. He would drink, cry and fall asleep. My mom talked more( she was very introverted). She drank to avoid my dad's use and I asked my dad if he liked the taste or was it the buzz. He said the buzz. Not everyone is the same.
This is something that has been bugging me across a number of venues. Common and even worse frequently is not the same thing as always. All it takes is to have a few own un-common quirks to (trigger on it I suppose) to be open to alternative that could happen for someone else.
I think it's totally improper for a psychologist to say "this happen". He wasn't there, and it's up to the jury to have that determination base on testimony and evidences.
He was basicely saying: don't think, I am the expert, I am right, follow my lead.
Would someone imagine dr Spiegel at a murder trial "mister X has behaviours that are consistent with someone who is a perpretrator of murder".
That is just so wrong: like JD lawyer said "someone either did something or did not" and it's not up to experts to be fact finder. Experts are at trial to explain, help the jury to understand useful things so THEY can give their verdict.
As someone with adhd (which iirc Johnny has), my short memory is complete and utter trash. I would fail that three word test so hard. My long term memory is fabulous though
For you to believe anything Amber said, you are REALLY far behind. Johnny's drug of choice was not cocaine, it was marijana, roxy and oxy codon and hard liquor. The owner of the park came forward yesterday and refuted Amber's entire story.
Saying that someone would assess truth in one of two parties is “behind” bc you don’t like that party just goes to show you don’t have the objectivity to EVER serve on a jury
@@bpark3726 He is basing an opinion on information that is 2 weeks old and has since been debunked by evidence this week. You basing my objectivity to EVERY serve on a jury, from one comment, proves your own point, you should never be allowed to serve on a jury, EVER.
Dr Kirk you’re killing me 😭 really expected to get to Amber’s testimony! Throwing curve balls. But I’m still here for it cause this guy was something.
I’m sorry but I do not agree with you, this doctor from testimony acts so weird that makes him not credible. He acts like he was on drugs himself, I’m sorry but this is a testimony, you have to pick representative experts not only with knowledge but by the way they behave as well.
Dr you missed the entire reason why ppl want you to watch this guy
You have gone on for over 25 minutes about hearsay and watching a few seconds of the testimony in question. Was really hoping to get a full breakdown of this guy but i can't sit through this anymore. I hope you're better in your practice at listening vs talking. You can do better than this.
Is there a place to see the evidence, like exactly and only evidence that the jury is going to see,separated from all other evidence
Great question! I'd like to know too. The UA-cam channels that some people have been recommending feature stuff that's questionable at best (like audios that have been edited, etc) while other channels are very editorialized and are vehicles for the creator's POV (which I don't care for. I'm just looking for the evidence, not someone's interpretation of the evidence). The testimonies we can get without commentary, but the other stuff I don't know...
You don’t have to watch scoops videos but I think she leaves links to her research so if you look at her video description you’ll probably find stuff.
You could just watch the unedited trial video and cut yourself off from reading other sources. That’s what the jury does
You should NEVER leave a review for something or someone you have no personal experience with. I don't like Dr. Hugh's but she does not deserve to be bullied because people don't like her opinion.
I want this guy to be my psychologist!
HE DOESNT KNOW ABOUT THE HICKSVILLE OWNER. This quack had plenty of 1 star reviews from years ago.
It's amazing you bring up Jack Sparrow because he actually admitted and apologized for using the Jack Sparrow character to judge Johnny. Wait till you get a load of what he said about Marlon Brando. Unless you've already seen that part and it's in your next video, I don't know. This guy is not working with every cylinder. it's the most PC of way I can put it. 2 more little facts this man is trying to sell his book and his seminars, and and hes also getting paid a stupid ridiculous amount of money per hour. His Steven King talk. The difference being you're a professor and wanting to make sure everybody understands and this guy wants his money.
I cannot believe people went to these clinicians websites and reviewed them negatively, Why would you go that far? This situation truly reflects how much people are really seeking out ways to project their issues on these individuals in media and not looking at all this from an objective outlook on this whole thing as an observer NOT an active participator. This is between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, it should not be personalised so much by people who do not even know them. You can relate and talk about it from an abuse is wrong perspective but not fighting over who between Johnny and Amber, their teams, witnesses etc is right or wrong. We simply do not know. This is the court of law and not the court of truth. I think this whole thing went way out of line.
Been waiting for this one. I really think that if you had watched the testimony as given you would have agreed that this doctor was grossly unprofessional. He didn’t review anything and said that he used johnnys movies to come to the conclusion that he was a narcissist. Your reaction is not making sense. But to be fair I turned it off halfway through
You're the fairest person commenting on this trial, and make me ask questions of my own biases against AH and consider that she may be telling the truth about some of it
Absolutely! Some of the stuff that he has done is violent and so is Amber’s. Initially I didn’t see it that way.