GE9X - The World's Biggest Jet Engine

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 чер 2024
  • Boeing 777x and Boeing 747 Equipped with This New GE9X Engines.
    #GE9X #777x #JetEngine
    Chapters
    0:00 Introduction
    0:45 GE9X Engine Size
    1:06 Boeing 777x
    1:48 105,000 lbf Thrust
    2:47 134 inches Diameter
    3:24 16 Blades Carbon Fiber
    4:00 2400 Degrees
    5:06 More then 15 feet
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 139

  • @GU_Official
    @GU_Official  2 роки тому +17

    Like and Subscribe

  • @norcaldeemichaels
    @norcaldeemichaels Рік тому +159

    Fun fact: This engine is the same diameter of an entire 737 fuselage.

    • @rohan-ghosh
      @rohan-ghosh Рік тому +14

      old news..the same was with the old engines

    • @x7wolverines7x
      @x7wolverines7x Рік тому +2

      This one’s bigger until the rolls Royce ultra fan thing comes out but no one knows what plane it will be on

    • @SieRoX87
      @SieRoX87 Рік тому +5

      Wow, that really puts it in perspective. That's huge!!! Never knew this...

    • @chris22capt
      @chris22capt Рік тому +7

      Nah, this one is larger. It is the 90 that has the same diameter to the 737 fuselage

    • @mhxxd4
      @mhxxd4 Рік тому +1

      The shroud is larger not the actual engine

  • @rixxroxxk1620
    @rixxroxxk1620 Рік тому +105

    Fun fact! NO ONE calls this the seven hundred and seventy-seven🙄. Hate computer narration.

    • @GU_Official
      @GU_Official  Рік тому +5

      Yeah sorry for that 😅

    • @priyankakhuntia8874
      @priyankakhuntia8874 Рік тому +2

      It's called as triple seven lol 🤣🤣

    • @houseofunorthodox370
      @houseofunorthodox370 Рік тому +2

      When I young and stupid I called it the seven seventy seven. Now, Triple Seven all the way!

    • @theoriginalsurferbob
      @theoriginalsurferbob Рік тому +1

      @@GU_OfficialI think we should talk more like these computer narrators. They speak better then todays human beings. So there.

    • @gerardosalazar161
      @gerardosalazar161 Рік тому +1

      In the industry we call it the seven seven and that’s s all. And the same with other models, just like the Seven Oh , the Seven Two and the Seven Eight.

  • @jackiechan6165
    @jackiechan6165 Рік тому +16

    Nothing will beat the start-up sound of the GE90-115B. The GE90 has the most elegant start-up and takeoff sound.

    • @byloyuripka9624
      @byloyuripka9624 Рік тому

      trents sound better imo, i work around all of the big engines including the handful of ge9xs in service right now for the 777x program. trents on the delta 330s make the ground shake when fuel is added, and incredible sound from first air to n2 to idle and onwards

    • @busofmauritius8306
      @busofmauritius8306 11 місяців тому

      ​@byloyuripka9624 how many ge9x in service for testing and with which aircraft? I thought they are only tested by the only 777X owned by Boeing

  • @Wadethewallaby2001
    @Wadethewallaby2001 5 місяців тому +4

    I miss the Boeing 747. Such an iconic airplane was thrown away.

    • @electricheartpony
      @electricheartpony 3 місяці тому

      Only a few airlines even use the 747. Maybe the cargo version could've continued being sold.

  • @boom-bm1kl
    @boom-bm1kl Рік тому +14

    This is so fascinating, like how humans were able to figure this out over time from the wright brothers till now is mind boggling

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 8 місяців тому

      The Wright Brothers would be totally amazed to see and fly on any Boeing 777 jetliner, all based on their idea of basic flight.

    • @dillon5155
      @dillon5155 8 місяців тому +1

      The Wright Brothers had this exact engine drawn up on a napkin but never got around to doing it

    • @patrickr2601
      @patrickr2601 3 місяці тому

      Or how about the fact that this engine was created from the earth we all stand on.

  • @freddyodonohoe2644
    @freddyodonohoe2644 2 роки тому +6

    Hello from Ireland 🍀👍🔥.. great video 👌

  • @SettiiiJetti-pj4nq
    @SettiiiJetti-pj4nq 11 місяців тому +2

    Imagine a 747-10 with 4 of these babies. My god.

  • @GEFanuc21t
    @GEFanuc21t Рік тому +5

    Not the GE9X... but I used to high-speed grind the blade tips on CFM-56 and CF-6 GE engines at Evendale, Ohio's Aircraft Engine Plant 1979 to 1985. I'd rather have my stinking hearing back though. It was incredibly loud with a complete bladed 4 to 9 stage high-pressure compressor spool spinning at 5000 rpm a foot away for my head...guarded of course with a cover but the sound was still there pulling a massive amount of air through the blades. The sound was like standing next to a running jet engine even with big ear muffs, it was really, really loud. The 5000 RPM was to simulate the spool running in the engine and sling the blades out tight against the roots of the dovetail slots from centrifugal force, while we plunge ground each stage of blades to a specific radial dimension and specific angle. It was all done on specially modified big manual grinders back then. We were IAM local 912 machinists.

    • @ianmangham4570
      @ianmangham4570 10 місяців тому +1

      Local 912 🤟🇺🇲💯

    • @kimmer6
      @kimmer6 4 місяці тому

      At least you can't hear the shitty ''music''in this video. I lost my hearing installing and overhauling GE Frame 3, 5, 6 and 7 heavy duty gas turbines driving generators and compressors all over the world. I was with GETSCO out of Schenectady. GE Tech Services Co.

    • @Heisenberg2K
      @Heisenberg2K 2 місяці тому

      What about bypass ratio?

  • @SJR_Media_Group
    @SJR_Media_Group Рік тому +3

    *_Former Boeing Everett.. GE9x is really that big... a 737 fuselage could fit through one..._*

  • @himmetramthakur6525
    @himmetramthakur6525 Рік тому +1

    Ge9x and ge90 engine manufacturing video I like it.more video plese manufacturing in factory and part bise how blessed part.

  • @QuietStormX
    @QuietStormX Рік тому +3

    Turbo Fan Engines and Military aircrafts and Jet Engines too in future to not work so hard and save fuel. They were easy for Me to work on and Fix and repair in U.S. Air Force... ;-D

  • @JuanFelipeCc
    @JuanFelipeCc Рік тому

    That looks great!
    A good thing that happened in my country lately is that 4 children were found in the middle of the Colombian jungle after spending 40 days alone after an airplane crashed and killed their mother. Now, we are waiting for the army to find a dog, who is missing, which was a key part of finding the kids.

  • @mollikyousufimtiaz2584
    @mollikyousufimtiaz2584 4 місяці тому

    This engine is the symbol of excellence

  • @Mbartel500
    @Mbartel500 Рік тому +5

    The RR Ultrafan has been in development for several years now, so yeah…the Ultrafan is the largest commercial jet engine ever…

    • @markn6941
      @markn6941 Рік тому

      for what plane?

    • @Mbartel500
      @Mbartel500 Рік тому

      @@markn6941 since it's not in production yet, it remains to be seen which planes if any, will use it. My guess would be the A350-1000, or maybe the 777-9 or 777-8. Possibly a stretched version of the 787 could also use it. The ultrafan is a geared turbofan with a variable pitch blade system. I think this engine technology will usher in a new era of super powerful yet very efficient jet engines. The biggest hurdles will be initial cost and long term reliability.

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 8 місяців тому

      ​@@Mbartel500The A350 will be way to small for the RR Ultrafan. I'd be surprised if they can even use it on the 777-9? Maybe on some future A380 sized or larger plane?

    • @spannaspinna
      @spannaspinna 6 місяців тому

      @@Mbartel500 if it’s not in production it’s only on paper and thus a prototype , so it’s not a commercial anything yet

    • @Mbartel500
      @Mbartel500 6 місяців тому

      @@spannaspinna it's not just on paper. It is a real engine that is being tested.

  • @GugilusVugilusMagnus
    @GugilusVugilusMagnus Рік тому +4

    GE should create an onlyfans of turbo fan engines.😂

  • @davecrupel2817
    @davecrupel2817 Рік тому +17

    134,000 pounds of thrust....
    That is *67 tons.*
    About the weight of a Merkaba Tank.
    THAT is an absolutely insane amount of power in a jet engine...

    • @GU_Official
      @GU_Official  Рік тому

      😎

    • @Posttrip
      @Posttrip Рік тому +1

      More then the Space Shuttle main engines at 100,000lbs of thrust, each. Simply amazing.

    • @thatsreallyamoon
      @thatsreallyamoon Рік тому +1

      @@Posttrip SSME were about 500,000 lb thrust each lol

    • @Posttrip
      @Posttrip Рік тому

      @@thatsreallyamoon. Whoops. I guess i misremembered something I heard. I stand corrected.

    • @lillyanneserrelio2187
      @lillyanneserrelio2187 11 місяців тому

      ​@@thatsreallyamoonthe (retired) space shuttle had 3 main engines. Per NASA website:
      Each Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) produces a sea level thrust of 179,097 kilograms (375,000 pounds) and a vacuum thrust of 213,188 (470,000 pounds).
      The engines throttle ranges from 65% to 109%.

  • @johnleyland338
    @johnleyland338 Рік тому +1

    Amazing technology

  • @seyyahaseyya6584
    @seyyahaseyya6584 Рік тому +3

    This dude GE9X such an Angel...Beyond the imitation machin.

  • @AntonioSantos-gd4bq
    @AntonioSantos-gd4bq Рік тому +2

    A MAIOR TURBINA DESENVOLVIDA PELA NASA FABRICADA PELA GENERAL ELETRIC PARA 777 VISANDO ECONOMIA DE COMBUSTÍVEL. UM SUCESSO.

  • @richardbriansmith8562
    @richardbriansmith8562 Рік тому +1

    Awesome Video

  • @GHOSTtf-dy2br
    @GHOSTtf-dy2br 4 місяці тому

    It’s crazy to think that the diameter of this engine is bigger than 737 fuselage 😮

  • @AdrianS1919
    @AdrianS1919 Рік тому +13

    3:00 ...and here I was wanting to stand in front of the engine when it was going full tit, 30,000 ft in the air. I'm glad I watched this. Thanks for the advice

    • @GU_Official
      @GU_Official  Рік тому +1

      👍

    • @filgiupo4853
      @filgiupo4853 Рік тому +1

      😂

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 8 місяців тому

      I seriously doubt if you're tall enough to stand at 30,000 ft, though.

  • @despizedicon
    @despizedicon Рік тому +1

    Computer voice over is one decision good

  • @mariomurillo2353
    @mariomurillo2353 Рік тому +3

    Best engine

  • @randallbenson9475
    @randallbenson9475 Рік тому +3

    GE...Ba•by! 💪

  • @tahititoutou3802
    @tahititoutou3802 10 днів тому

    Who put this crazy "music" on this video?

  • @joshuahalla.k.a.controlla6333
    @joshuahalla.k.a.controlla6333 Рік тому +2

    Wow.

  • @fkarmadi
    @fkarmadi Рік тому +2

    First time I heard someone calling B777 as Seven Hunded Seventy Seven

  • @roberthicks6697
    @roberthicks6697 Рік тому +1

    South Wales finest !

  • @colgatetoothpaste4865
    @colgatetoothpaste4865 Рік тому

    Lindisimo

  • @axnnaandmikeyplayz5044
    @axnnaandmikeyplayz5044 Рік тому +8

    Can I have permission to borrow your most powerful and biggest jet engine just to charge my smart phone

  • @kennedyxhulu4933
    @kennedyxhulu4933 Рік тому +1

    How's it more fuel efficient than the A350 when it's 20% or more heavier than the A350?

    • @filgiupo4853
      @filgiupo4853 Рік тому +2

      Bigger engine = more air = less power to use = more efficient.

    • @markn6941
      @markn6941 Рік тому +2

      longer wings better engines.

    • @TrentonThomas627
      @TrentonThomas627 5 місяців тому

      Has a higher mtow also it's lighter than it's predecessor which was very efficient so more power less weight means better performance. It likely will burn less fuel or similar amount of fuel as the 350 but with a heavier load

  • @defalt45
    @defalt45 Рік тому +1

    Oh yeah the Boeing SEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY SEVEN

  • @AlbertoPirrotta
    @AlbertoPirrotta Рік тому +1

    GE90-115B is the most in the world, but not the biggest one !

  • @nachowifi9674
    @nachowifi9674 Рік тому +1

    Id still like to have 4 engines. 1 goes bad, still have 3 more. With this setup, 1 goes bad, you have just 1 left 😮😮😮

    • @GU_Official
      @GU_Official  Рік тому

      You can still land with 1 engine safely

    • @justing42
      @justing42 11 місяців тому

      And the airplane is designed to fly that way

  • @ghotridr9550
    @ghotridr9550 Рік тому +2

    Rolls Royce...hold my 🍺

    • @markn6941
      @markn6941 Рік тому

      RR is way behind GE in marker shares.

  • @ASHISH_OP_9
    @ASHISH_OP_9 2 роки тому +4

    🥰

  • @user-qm6hm3yz5k
    @user-qm6hm3yz5k 9 місяців тому

    ❤❤❤

  • @rochmadrega3881
    @rochmadrega3881 Рік тому +1

    Mesin handal

  • @the_mcmartin
    @the_mcmartin Рік тому

    134300? 😱 That's almost equal to 4 Trent 900s' of an a380. Wow 😅

    • @killerwrecks
      @killerwrecks Рік тому

      funny that Rolls-Royce is making an even bigger turbo fan!

    • @frutdafruit
      @frutdafruit Рік тому

      2 Trents can produce more than one GE9X

  • @pawnstar365
    @pawnstar365 2 місяці тому

    Somehow somewhere there will be a civic owner trying to install this in their clapped out 99 hollowed shit box 😂

  • @ianmangham4570
    @ianmangham4570 10 місяців тому

    1:48 i wanna hear it by the number's 😮

  • @Blyxtee
    @Blyxtee 8 місяців тому

    is this an advertisement about the engine?????

  • @Wildlifesupernannyfan
    @Wildlifesupernannyfan Рік тому

    START UP VIDIO WITH GOOD QUALITY AUDIO PLEASE!!

  • @yoyok1y
    @yoyok1y Рік тому

    Comparing that to the person there lol

  • @gosekinz
    @gosekinz Рік тому +3

    always wondered what if Airbus re-engined the 380 with a pair of these

    • @GU_Official
      @GU_Official  Рік тому

      It's going be even bigger I guess

    • @superskullmaster
      @superskullmaster Рік тому +1

      That would make no sense considering these are too large and too powerful. It would make better sense to use the RR engines that the A350 uses.

  • @justing42
    @justing42 11 місяців тому

    There was a United commercial years ago that called them the Seven Triple Seven…lame

  • @user-ug8bo7vu7o
    @user-ug8bo7vu7o 2 роки тому +1

    Intzar

  • @Wadethewallaby2001
    @Wadethewallaby2001 5 місяців тому +1

    I don’t like the new airline policy. I’m not gonna be flying around with an inexperienced pilot.

  • @Nikx012
    @Nikx012 Рік тому +2

    But not most powerful... that belongs to the current 777 engines due to its old heavy tech

    • @frutdafruit
      @frutdafruit Рік тому +1

      nope. This engine has beaten the GE90, producing up to 134,300 lbf (compared to the 127,900 lbf of the GE90).

  • @lando1071
    @lando1071 Рік тому +4

    Cool video. Too bad it had an annoying robo voice. Need to go back to having real narrators.

    • @GU_Official
      @GU_Official  Рік тому

      Thanks, please check out new voice let me know your opinion

  • @GiftHorse123
    @GiftHorse123 5 місяців тому

    7 hundred, and 77?? Who in the hell says this? Like the 7 hundred and 37?

    • @kimmer6
      @kimmer6 4 місяці тому

      A computer voice.

  • @Nine.ix.9
    @Nine.ix.9 4 місяці тому

    Everytime he mentions "Seven hundred seventy seven"... I keep on having the urge to close this video... 😑

  • @walterwhite2270
    @walterwhite2270 Рік тому +3

    Very interesting video..narration sucked...it was annoying to listen the narrator speak.

    • @GU_Official
      @GU_Official  Рік тому

      Thanks Walter, I got new narrator now hope you like it

    • @walterwhite2270
      @walterwhite2270 Рік тому +1

      I rewatched the video and my point i should have made earlier...constantly referencing someone in you video on what they said takes away from the video. I personally don't think you need to keep saying..he says or he adds....there are ways to reference you sources without constantly putting it in your sentences....
      I do however want to complement you on the video content...it was awesome to see some of the engine in an expanded suspension in air...thx

  • @slickwoodworker3023
    @slickwoodworker3023 Рік тому

    At 2:56 "11 foot span..."
    11 is > than 1 so your should say "11 FEET span..."
    (or should I say the animated voice should say)

  • @colgatetoothpaste4865
    @colgatetoothpaste4865 Рік тому

    Only 10 percent less

  • @jamesbradley3741
    @jamesbradley3741 Рік тому +1

    Seven hundred and seventy seven aircraft....???? Who on earth says that? Has this narrator been in a hole for the last 40 years?

  • @SDRob01
    @SDRob01 10 місяців тому

    What's with the weird computerized voice? Just narrate the video in normal English.

  • @flyonbyya
    @flyonbyya Рік тому +1

    A human voice-over would be preferable to this computer generated one.
    Sorry…Almost unlistenable !

    • @GU_Official
      @GU_Official  Рік тому

      Yes I agree, please check out new voice I believe it's decent

  • @arthurrogers2289
    @arthurrogers2289 Рік тому

    Better more smaller engines, 4 not 2