... so says the layman, over drinks.. When a company such as Boeing pushes things along, driven by accountants, profits, racing for market dominance, etc., corners are cut, planes crash, people die. All in good time, my friend. All in good time. 🤝 🍻
@@alicelund147 certification takes a long time now. especially for boeing, cuz the faa is right on their tail after the 737 max crashes and poor quality control. it could’ve been delivered to airlines in late 2020 but there were delays, and problems with the engines that ge provided due to a component in the engine.
People have no concept of the complexity of these engines. Not only the actual design but putting the design into action. The number of internal components is mind boggling and each one has to operate under enormous heat and pressure for thousands of hours, perfectly. Often, new materials are developed that can withstand the heat and pressure and other manufacturers are used to provide these parts on time and perfect. This takes time, lots of time.
Yes. I got it! Very good news that the GE9X is ready to fly with quality and in safety conditions. A pity that Boeing airplanes are not as reliable and mostly grounded.
Crazy when you look at the GE9X when compared to a normal engine For reffrence it looks likr this (oO) look at the engine No 2 attached to the boeing 747 at 5:46
Years late, lots of problems and nothing yet delivered. Meanwhile RR and Airbus can’t make A350s fast enough. GE advantage if it ever happens could be overtaken by the RR ultra fan.
ultrafan might take the advantage once it’s completed and tested, but what manufacturer will put it on a plane? i mean boeing could put it on the 777x, but i don’t think airbus will be able to put it on the a350.
@@_.twixxx The UltraFan is a test bed only, with new tech already transferring from it to the Trents. News is however, that 2 other testbed UFs are being developed, both of different and smaller sizes, as this engine is scaleable. What could RR possibly want with a smaller version??🙂🙂..........
@@artrandy maybe an a350 or a380 neo, but i was referring to the original size of the ultrafan due to how massive it was. that original engine could definitely fit in the 777x, but not the a350.
@@_.twixxx You're missing the point entirely. UltraFan is a test bed only, (how can I make this point more clear😀😀?) RR have no ambition for UltraFan to power a commercial airliner in passenger service. Neither an A380 nor an A350. However, developments from UltraFan could develop into a new engine, which presumably is why its being scaled down. Think narrow bodies, buddy..............
@@artrandy well i did do an educated guess. didn’t think narrowbodies tho. smaller and more improved new engines that rr could or definitely will make could definitely hit in the a320 neo family market or boeing’s 797, which should be the 757’s replacement i presume, or boeings new 737 replacement.
Magic is in the 777X wings. Composite, high aspect ratio wings create less drag, so engines can have less thrust. GE90 with less thrust can have higher by-pass ratio fans which now becomes GE9X, with better efficiency. Larger wing area also means better lift which allows more aircraft weight, which in turn translates to longer fuselage and more seats. 777 becomes 777X.
@@user-yt198 “On November 10, 2017, a GE9X engine reached a record thrust of 134,300 lbf (597 kN) in Peebles, a new Guinness World Record breaking the GE90-115B 127,900 lbf (569 kN) record set in 2002.[15][16] The block test engine ran at its operational limits, at triple red-line conditions: maximum fan speed, maximum core speed, and maximum exhaust gas temperature. Icing tests started in Winnipeg at the end of 2017. The initial 777X flight-test engines were shipped in 2018 for an initial 777-9 flight in early 2019.[17] A quarter of the certification testing was done by May 2018: icing, crosswind/inlet distortion, inlet distortion , fan and booster blade vibrations, HP turbine blade vibrations and thermal survey.[13]” -Wikipedia. You can also see that the GE9X surpassed the GE90 and broke its record on GE Aviation’s UA-cam page too. It generated 134,300lbs of thrust, surpassing the GE90-115B’s 127,900lbs of thrust. The GE9X’s might be set lower to 105,000lbs of thrust on the 777x for efficiency purposes though I’m not sure if Boeing did it.
"The GE 9X engine hold the record of being the largest as well as the most powerplant for commercial engines" what? 😂 I hate AI-generated content, you're killing civilization, literally
Will it power the A380 with the fuel efficiency needed to put the A380 back into production? We need the A380 because Boeing has committed corporate suicide thats will take decades to recover from if possible.
They developed it for 12 years and it is not yet delivered to any airline. Sounds expensive, it better be really good.
... so says the layman, over drinks..
When a company such as Boeing pushes things along, driven by accountants, profits, racing for market dominance, etc., corners are cut, planes crash, people die.
All in good time, my friend. All in good time. 🤝 🍻
@@alicelund147 certification takes a long time now. especially for boeing, cuz the faa is right on their tail after the 737 max crashes and poor quality control. it could’ve been delivered to airlines in late 2020 but there were delays, and problems with the engines that ge provided due to a component in the engine.
@@_.twixxxcould have should have was intended …. yup sounds like „good“ project 😂
People have no concept of the complexity of these engines. Not only the actual design but putting the design into action. The number of internal components is mind boggling and each one has to operate under enormous heat and pressure for thousands of hours, perfectly. Often, new materials are developed that can withstand the heat and pressure and other manufacturers are used to provide these parts on time and perfect. This takes time, lots of time.
These engines are just ridiculous. It amazes me how man kind created these. The amount of power is astounding, almost unreal.
It’s not “ALL OVER!” Clickbait crap.
Yes. I got it! Very good news that the GE9X is ready to fly with quality and in safety conditions. A pity that Boeing airplanes are not as reliable and mostly grounded.
GE aviation engines proud American make, love. the best engines.
I thought it was "all over" when Rolls Royce announced their new engine a short time ago.
Marvelous engineering 👌.
Be nice to see a 777-X flying with an airline...
Does it stay on the wing in flight?
Will it stop boeings plunging out of the sky?
How oh how are you going to keep them on the wings ?
Crazy when you look at the GE9X when compared to a normal engine
For reffrence it looks likr this (oO) look at the engine No 2 attached to the boeing 747 at 5:46
Happy 20k sub's 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🗣🗣🗣🗣🗣🗣🗣🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Nice one.. But getting a type certificate may delay further to 2027 by considering the current situation and issues found at Thrust links..
Years late, lots of problems and nothing yet delivered. Meanwhile RR and Airbus can’t make A350s fast enough. GE advantage if it ever happens could be overtaken by the RR ultra fan.
ultrafan might take the advantage once it’s completed and tested, but what manufacturer will put it on a plane? i mean boeing could put it on the 777x, but i don’t think airbus will be able to put it on the a350.
@@_.twixxx
The UltraFan is a test bed only, with new tech already transferring from it to the Trents. News is however, that 2 other testbed UFs are being developed, both of different and smaller sizes, as this engine is scaleable. What could RR possibly want with a smaller version??🙂🙂..........
@@artrandy maybe an a350 or a380 neo, but i was referring to the original size of the ultrafan due to how massive it was. that original engine could definitely fit in the 777x, but not the a350.
@@_.twixxx
You're missing the point entirely. UltraFan is a test bed only, (how can I make this point more clear😀😀?)
RR have no ambition for UltraFan to power a commercial airliner in passenger service. Neither an A380 nor an A350.
However, developments from UltraFan could develop into a new engine, which presumably is why its being scaled down. Think narrow bodies, buddy..............
@@artrandy well i did do an educated guess. didn’t think narrowbodies tho. smaller and more improved new engines that rr could or definitely will make could definitely hit in the a320 neo family market or boeing’s 797, which should be the 757’s replacement i presume, or boeings new 737 replacement.
Just don't screw up your clients like P & W
Sounds like AI generated garbage and lots of fluff 🚮
Infomercial
I don't understand how this engine makes sense for the 8x/9x? It produces less thrust than the 115B.
Magic is in the 777X wings.
Composite, high aspect ratio wings create less drag, so engines can have less thrust. GE90 with less thrust can have higher by-pass ratio fans which now becomes GE9X, with better efficiency.
Larger wing area also means better lift which allows more aircraft weight, which in turn translates to longer fuselage and more seats. 777 becomes 777X.
nope actually more than the ge90. it broke its record.
@@_.twixxx Nope. GE9X is larger than GE90 in size and weight, but not in thrust.
@@user-yt198 “On November 10, 2017, a GE9X engine reached a record thrust of 134,300 lbf (597 kN) in Peebles, a new Guinness World Record breaking the GE90-115B 127,900 lbf (569 kN) record set in 2002.[15][16] The block test engine ran at its operational limits, at triple red-line conditions: maximum fan speed, maximum core speed, and maximum exhaust gas temperature. Icing tests started in Winnipeg at the end of 2017. The initial 777X flight-test engines were shipped in 2018 for an initial 777-9 flight in early 2019.[17] A quarter of the certification testing was done by May 2018: icing, crosswind/inlet distortion, inlet distortion , fan and booster blade vibrations, HP turbine blade vibrations and thermal survey.[13]” -Wikipedia. You can also see that the GE9X surpassed the GE90 and broke its record on GE Aviation’s UA-cam page too. It generated 134,300lbs of thrust, surpassing the GE90-115B’s 127,900lbs of thrust. The GE9X’s might be set lower to 105,000lbs of thrust on the 777x for efficiency purposes though I’m not sure if Boeing did it.
@@user-yt198The GE9X thrust literally broke the Guinness World Record in 2017 which was previously held by the GE90.
Never mind the engine what about the Boeing?
come on, what year is it? we dont have ssto(single stage to orbit) yet? damn star wars and ksp(kerbal spcace program) for gettin my hope up lol
5:45 Wait What the hell that GE9X is doing with the CFMs😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
"The GE 9X engine hold the record of being the largest as well as the most powerplant for commercial engines" what? 😂 I hate AI-generated content, you're killing civilization, literally
" Resulting in premature deterioration of components " ....In other words, the whole collection of nuts and bolts came apart and the shit broke 7:37
If it’s a Boeing I ain’t going.
Has anyone told RR?
Whete looking at retirement technology. Meaning its technology that will affect me personally when I'm at retirement age and I'm 41 😂
so will it "revolutionize " the cost of flying for the passenger ? Noooo
SAA 🇿🇦
Repeating same stuff., Pease tell us technical innovations and how they work on the he engine.
Did he say smegma?
Will it power the A380 with the fuel efficiency needed to put the A380 back into production? We need the A380 because Boeing has committed corporate suicide thats will take decades to recover from if possible.
I bet if Elon wanted to make these types of engines ,GE would be a fucking joke.
IH(aitch)I です。
Blah blah blah
The engines are good, but aircraft is not. Boeing failed
Then go and u make an aircraft 😬 if u can
@@autofocus211 Airbas will do. They know how. Boeing needs total replenishment all managers and engineers, involved in wrong decisions must be fired
FIRST