Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Tae Kwon Do and Tang Soo Do
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 лют 2014
- My husband and his instructor did equivalent rank forms. Strong Foot (in the white) is doing Pyung Ahn E Dan in Tang Soo Do and Swift Foot (in the red) is doing Wan Yo in Tae Kwon Do. Both arts are from Korea but they are so different from each other. Tang Soo Do even takes longer from White belt to 1st Dan!
Nice contrast! I rarely see this sort of demonstration.
I had to watch this three times to get a feel for a personal preference. I give a slight edge to the Tae Kwon Do routine, largely due to the difference in moves between the 0:30 and 0:40 time span. To my eyes, in this part of the routine the TKD style was a bit more fluid and versatile.
The TKD practitioner seemed more agile and fluid, though the Tang Soo Do artist appeared to display greater power. That could be due to natural differences in the physiology and psychological makeup of the two men, but might also be at least in part a product of their training. The names "Strong Foot" and "Swift Foot" do seem to apply here. :-)
Thanks for posting this. I am trying to select a martial art and I found this very helpful.
Tang Soo do is something I do, it is indeed elegant, but it is hard to master. You do unique moves, like a Dragon kick, or a tornado Kick. My master, is a 5th Degree Black Belt in her job. She is very helpful! I go with Tang Soo Do, with you.
Skyler Aerts I do tang soo do aswell
Kristie Goss
Me too. I'm just a beginner though.
In white gi, it's really look like Kyokushin ^^
tang soo do is my life💘.
So true, Tang Soo!
Ναντια Evans sameeee
Me 2
I agree with Tigerpaws the juxtaposition is rare and in this demonstration pleasant to watch.
As a 3rd Dan in TSD I must admit my bias with Pyung Ahn Ee Dan. I find the north-south asymmetric choreography more interesting to watch.
Quick question are the two practitioners, strong foot and swift foot, equally ranked?
Either way, I am impressed with swift foot's side kicks.
Thanks for the upload
and Good Luck in your training!
The Tang Soo Do - ga in white has a good Dwit-gubi stance. Basic is all about in martial arts.
I like the idea but both of these people have terrible technique. I'm an 11 year (3rd Dan) practitioner of Tang Soon Do and this is something we need to stop showing. If the technique is garbage, don't put it out there. The guy doing TSD isn't driving power from his hips enough, his center bobs up and down too much, the stance is terribly high, the spirit breath is quiet, there is over rotation and dramatic action added to his movements that would be easy tells in a combat situation. TSD is a hard style and should be trained as such. Forms = Composed combat, all developed by people who used these techniques in battle. Also, this concept of stolen forms is absurd. All martial arts are connected and should be shared with other martial artists who take it seriously. The flow from one technique to another, power of each technique, and the amount of spirit and time you give to your practice is important. My instructors also trained in Judo and Kyokushin throughout their lives. We learned lessons that came from them. The terrible thing that is happening now is watered down martial arts & this concept that MMA is some high evolution of martial arts. Tang Soo Do and other martial arts are not sports or fitness classes, they are a lifestyle.
Terrible? Garbage? There is always room for improvement, but our instructors would never talk to us that way unless there was a lack of effort or dedication, and I see no sign of this here. This kind of commentary is more reminiscent of Cobra Kai than Tang Soo Do.
Alex Gracey , Tang Soo! 💪🏼 kamsamnida!
Alex Gracey
Yes, finally I'm not the only one saying it.
ua-cam.com/video/VsxYg00xYgg/v-deo.html
I have trained under Master Penfil, and Mike Birch for many years.
The Bent Spoon
Even if it's not an exercise in perfect technique, they should have represented themselves, their school and their style with something that looked way better than than that, because seeing that, I wouldn't want to train at their school.
And if they used good, powerful,
sharp, technique you could compare the differences a lot better.
That's how it should be performed every time.
They were sloppy.
Tang Soo Do is a hard style, traditional battle field stuff.
tang soo do
Watched the right one:
Movements too stocking and also too fluent. Means that he does the techniques fast but not as powerful as they could be because he uses his strentgh in a not efficient way.
His stances aren't good either. They seem to be more of an alibi stance.
The up and down of his body while he walks wastes energy as well.
Watch his hollow back. That shouldn't be there.
And yes i'm nagging and nagging but look at the date. He is probably better by now. And that's what counts.
Neither of those are Taekwon-Do.
Based on the Encyclopedia of Taekwon-Do, and the teachings of General Choi, which are readily available. Beginning from the ready posture - Close Ready Stance A - in which the knees are not supposed to be bent, to the last movement - Middle, Forearm, Guarding Block - which is incorrect in its execution and final geometry the entire performance includes an extensive list of violations of the 9 Training Secrets of Taekwon-Do. So while it includes the correct number of movements, and they have a general resemblance to the prescribed techniques for Won-Hyo, it strays so far from General Choi's teaching as to not really qualify as Taekwon-Do. Essentially, it is a Taekwon-Do Tul (form) performed in a non Taekwon-Do fashion.
I'm not trying to be mean, but you asked.
Given the references that I used in my response, it should be evident that I know the difference between the ITF and WTF. Moreover, this is not about minor differences between schools this is about corrupting one style with another. I respect all styles but not, for example, what the person in Red is doing by performing an ITF pattern while disregarding fundamental ITF technical elements in EVERY single movement from the very first to the very last one.
My point is that if you do an ITF pattern, do it in the ITF style; if you want to do things in the WTF style then do WTF patterns. As a 20 year ITF practitioner I would not have the audacity to perform WTF Poomsae using ITF Taekwon-Do movement strategies. It would be wrong and I can just imagine the chorus of criticism I'd hear from the WTF community, and rightly so.
To use an analogy; people through the world drive motorized vehicles on public road ways. Some on the left others on the right side of the road. Assuming you're from a country that drives on the right and you go to a country that drives on the left, can you just say "In my country we drive on the right side so that what I'm going to do here, it's still driving it's not wrong, it's just the style we use where I'm from." ... see how that works out for you!
You miss the point, it's not about how I was taught, as you put it, it's about how it was created, evolved and put to print as recently as 1999. Do what ever you want but if you say you do Taekwon-Do, then do Taekwon-Do, not 's modified or primitive version... and if you change it please own the change by renaming it ...Joe Bloe Do for example.
And 'hush now' ... really... hahaha one always knows the other party is getting insecure about their position when the either raise their voice or tell you to shut up. No worries, I'll say no more because I know when I'm wasting my time on a "don't confuse me with the facts, I have my mind made up" situation! ;)
I do tsd for like 7 years im red belt