385-24 referenses appointing an RSO, but appointment orders always state CBRN representative or something like that, is there a requirement for appointing a CBRN rep? Is it implied the RSO is the same as CBRN, or should the PAM be updated?
RSO orders are different than a CBRN rep. You should have both. In my cben room I have the uncappomied access roster, cbrn officer appt orders and I have my cbrn rep on appt orders as well
Curious why you state that service packets are not required, regs state service packet is required for each piece of equipment, not challenging, seeking clarification, it requires a maint. Plan, shouldnt it require the service packet
What I am saying is tou dont need an actual packet or folder. Usually they have the required documents stapled together and then filled. I don't like thst method. I use folders so it's uniformed and present a clean appearance
385-24 referenses appointing an RSO, but appointment orders always state CBRN representative or something like that, is there a requirement for appointing a CBRN rep? Is it implied the RSO is the same as CBRN, or should the PAM be updated?
RSO orders are different than a CBRN rep. You should have both. In my cben room I have the uncappomied access roster, cbrn officer appt orders and I have my cbrn rep on appt orders as well
Curious why you state that service packets are not required, regs state service packet is required for each piece of equipment, not challenging, seeking clarification, it requires a maint. Plan, shouldnt it require the service packet
What I am saying is tou dont need an actual packet or folder. Usually they have the required documents stapled together and then filled. I don't like thst method. I use folders so it's uniformed and present a clean appearance
@@1SGValora got it, you are correct and I also dislike that method, thanks for what you do