My students CRITIQUED my painting and THIS HAPPENED?!? Painting a Mountain River Landscape in OILS!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- Get EXCLUSIVE CONTENT - Critiques, Q+A's, Livestreams, Video podcast + MORE! tisch.academy/
New PORTRAIT PAINTING tutorial COMING SOON! Be the first to know upon release!
www.andrewtisc...
New! IN THE MOUNTAINS painting tutorial,
www.andrewtisc...
DIGITAL: In this video I sketch my digital design using PHOTOSHOP CC, using a Wacom Tablet Intuos Pro II
Check out GRUT BRUSHES for Photoshop (not a sponsor)
www.grutbrushe...
Tell Nicolai Andrew sent you ;)
The OIL PAINT I use:
blueridgeoilpa...
The PAINT BRUSHES I use:
www.rosemaryan...
LIMITED EDITION PRINTS:
www.andrewtisc...
Check out GRUT BRUSHES for Photoshop (not a sponsor)
www.grutbrushe...
Tell Nicolai Andrew sent you ;)
SUBSCRIBE THROUGH MY WEBSITE: Be the first to view my UA-cam tutorials - 24 hours before they are LIVE and stay in touch! Stay up-to-date with the latest NEWS news from the studio, exclusive DEALS and MORE! Go to: www.andrewtisc...
Connect with me:
Instagram: / andrew_tischler_artist
Facebook: / andrewtischlerartist
The only thing I can think of to make this painting perfect…. Location! It needs to be hanging in my home! Love your work pal!
you're not the Lone Ranger. LOL
I love the new one - the mnt was separated from the front before, now you can see the connection.
Thank you very much for the wonderful video. Thank you very much and very interesting thanks ..For ..sharing videos .. thanks for sharing . 💯..💓.💓 ...💯...
Wow,! Amazing video sharing.
It's really helpful for beginners.
Very interesting and informative tips.
Keep continue
Stay healthy and happy always 😊👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Your block-in stage is far better and detailed than my finnished paintings :(
You're impressionist, I think
@@rosidmuhtadi6339 I dont know what style I have 😂
I kinda paint same scenes as Tish but obviously not as advanced. I try to make it look somewhat realistic but without reference from imagination and memory.
Looks more like a childrens movie
@@Skytte-po7jzI always challenge my self to imitate the colors as close as I can, rather than the details. It works as a self learner
@@rosidmuhtadi6339 Thanks for the tip =)
Make sure you’re getting all the values right during the block-in stage :> Color checking can be really helpful as well with putting in details or getting the values right, if you struggle with that
To Many horizontal lines across the painting Think more vertical lines
You are one of the youtubers who have inspired me to stop "hoarding" art supplies and start using them. I have to say, I really enjoy painting and thank you.
Came for the clickbait title, stayed for the painting
I really like the composition you came up with finally, I could see your episodes forever. Stunning landscape, it's really eerie to think it's imaginary
If not bear then how about Hobbit, I remember seeing some where there were hobbits in New Zealand
Love your painting just the way it is… not busily cluttered with animals.
But what if there were 500 pigeons in the sky! 🤣
yeah its not a disney scene Nature isnt like that~
Andrew, watching you paint is so mesmerising. I learnt so much from this video, both during the critique session and the painting session.( I must admit, I was thinking it was a test for us.) I just love the changes you did to this image and it is refreshing to know and to assure all of us, that even you, who I have put right up there on the highest pedestal, is humble enough to allow us to critique your work and you took it on the chin and went with the flow. Thank you so much. I just love watching you create your magic and all the comedy is a bonus. Keep on doing what you are doing
A great insight to Tish process, thank you Andrew. I love both before and after
beautiful! Thumbs up! 👍👍👍
Hello Andrew, you are doing fine and this video is giving anserws to many good questions. Your painting is efortless and brave. Your presentation is a genius show. Thank you very much.
Many thanks!
please make video step by step for beginners
The first painting was definitely claustrophobic with the two trees on either side. The new one just makes me feel so much more free and the brighter colours make the scene so much more alive. Definitely a good choice when removing the tree on the right.
Your painting is beautiful compositionally,,,,even that waterfall running off the canvas. Unless you are just wanting to be picky or find something simply for conversation it is unlikely that someone that isn’t an artist will find a thing “wrong” with it. If I went by first impression, the only thing “lacking” might be some warmer tones in there somewhere. It has a very cool look even though it’s a summer scene.
The rework had a bit more colour range, too cool still? It's very typical of NZ now, but perhaps I can revisit this aspect...
@@AndrewTischlerArt No need to revisit! The original was cool. Your reworked version has a much more appealing warmth! Besides,,,ask a hundred people and get a hundred opinions. Seems like you’ve worked through lots of viewer tips and chose what worked with your overall idea and I’m sure none of “us” are in your league anyway : )
You're opinion and feedback is always valid!
Andrew sir, i noticed that everytime you paint your brushes are new, no old pigments or whatsoever that pigment that is left, brushes really is the key to good brush strokes, regarding your painting is really amazing salute you sir i learn a lot from your demo.
🤔🙂👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻🖌️🎨⭐⭐⭐🖼️🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Stunning artist and artworks! How to be you? 😍🎨💕
Not bad for a painting with no bears in it. 😝
He could have added a hobbit.
The one thing everybody’s missing is temperature. it lacks temperature . Bierstadt was huge temperature painter . This is what it needs if it even needs anything at all .
I would suggest more luminosity . some more fun with light and warm temperature.
Fan from India 🇮🇳
I know it's only block in stage but those mountains needs pushing back - they look way too close now. I really like the original version but can see that there is a disconnect from foreground to background. The original looks like a foreground has been cut out and pasted on top of a background pic - both beautifully painted and realistic but something needs to be going off in the middle to link them. This is the part where I struggle tbh and spend hours and hours staring hoping for a light bulb moment :)
Tienes gran talento, gracias por compartirlo en las redes. Por favor subtitulos en español.
VALUES! - It's hard in this video to be sure whether there is a strong light source but that being said, looking at the video on my laptop, squinting I see too much of the same value from the mountain top to the foreground. It's a beautiful painting but it doesn't have the ZING that would grab me and I'd say "dang, I love that painting and I want to own it! Moving the elements around is interesting and either way makes for a pleasing composition but something has to grab the viewer's eyes and the heart and scream BEAUTIFUL!
I might have had the camera a little underexposed LOL!
I would shift the angle of perspective on the last waterfall as to keep the details in the right bank. Push the left bank more into the mid-ground by changing the tones & reducing the details. Extend the width of the canvas & lower the horizon line to include more sky. I 💛 the flow lines of the waters.
Next time you'll have to join my Patreon to make sure I include your comments! I've already taken the ciritique... now I'm off! 😂
Loving how it shows no one is above critique. All that feedback really took this piece to the next level. The warm light and breathing room in the composition really draws me in. Thank you for sharing!
He is at the next level.
really good to see the feed back from your patreon supporters, I like the idea of seeing some life in a painting, you could put a Haast eagle in there.
Didn't he do an red-tailed eagle 🤔 that would be like a Tisch stamp lol but, I must say, the idea he had, composition especially, was wonderful. Actually made me say, "ohhhh wow! Yes! Ewww I can't wait to see that painting" so, it's hard for me to even say what's wrong. And I could go on for days with "what if"
My Master Andrew Tischler Respect from Ethiopia 🇪🇹🇪🇹🇪🇹🙏🙏🙏🙏
Nz Blue duck.
Taking the tree out was a brilliant idea. The glazier and top of the waterfall are no longer fighting for dominance. It's beautiful Andrew.
Great job! My art instructor said to me,”One must always be teachable to reach the simplest of sophistication.”
Misconceptions you are breaking in my mind:
You cannot hold the brush like a pencil
You cannot be detailed and painterly
You cannot blend paint on the canvas
The set-it-and-forget-it brush stroke.
…so many ideas I’ve begrudgingly tried to apply to my style that really didn’t make sense to me. Thank you!
Misconceptions you are breaking in my mind:
You cannot hold the brush like a pencil
You cannot be detailed and painterly
You cannot blend paint on the canvas
The set-it-and-forget-it brush stroke.
…so many ideas I’ve begrudgingly tried to apply to my style that really didn’t make sense to me. Thank you!
I love this painting!!! It looks stunning and better than the first one, although the first one was great as well. Thank you for your inspiration, I'm happy for watching this video!
I'm impressed with technic and color matching, and composition 🤩
Thanks so much! I really appreciate the comment
Ekaterina!
🤣🤣🤣 ur such a nerd tisch, haha that intro was hilarious. a much needed laugh after 18 months of depression & covid lies, thank you !
I'm right there with you. Enough damn lies, let's have a laugh, and a beer. 😉👍
@@AndrewTischlerArt haha yess, 0% beer for me though, i'm in rehab, maybe a home made lemonade with mint or something👍
Hola,saludos desde Brasil. Tienes un gran talento.
Lot of 2s ,2 rocks down stream 2 water fall area 2 trees sitting parallel and similar in size. Beautiful painting though, I wish mine looked this good!
In your videos since then ( jan 2022 ) , you are pushing yourself to be looser, more "painterly" . Well you did it without realizing it ! Just look at the block-in. There, IT IS DONE. STOP. 🛑
🚨🚔👮" Tisch, step away from your easel, give me those brushes and let me see your painting papers... "
The problem with the Hudson River painters and the reason why they were eventually pushed out of the way by Tonalism, which was the longest lasting art movement in history, was the sad fact that their scenes said everything and therefore said nothing. A work of art, like an orchestra, needs supporting instruments, but people like Bierstadt and Church couldn't resist letting every instrument play as loud and at the same volume as all the others. If everyone in a choir is shouting, there is no point. On the other hand, the Tonalists gave us the intimacy and quietude that one really wants to see in a work of art. They were poets and were not trying to paint their grandiose scenes with every leaf and blade of grass (you can do that with a camera). Frederic Edwin Church gave us incredible vistas including his Niagara Falls, and yet failed to give us the poetry of nature. Was he a good technician? Yes. But did he give us something that transcended into the spiritual, like those paintings coming from people like George Inness, Twachtman, Charles Warren Eaton, Wyant, Ranger and a host of others? No. Look at dozens of Tonalist paintings and tell me that they don't move you like great poetry-a transcendence. With the Hudson River School, there was no mystery, no true poetry-nothing left for our imaginations. If you don't understand this, compare the two schools and you will begin to understand.
AWESOME ANDREW. YOU'RE A YOUNG MASTER, AND VERY WISE AND YET NOT WHITE OF HAIR YET. ANYONE WHO WILL EVER MET YOU WILL WALK AWAY A MUCH RICHER PERSON.
MUCH LOVE TO YOU DEAR BROTHER. GOD BLESS ALWAYS, YOU ARE A BLESSING TO ALL OF US. THANK YOU FOREVER. LOVE LIGHT & PEACE BE WITH YOU AT ALL TIMES. Bruce Bissell in Southwest Utah,
I truly like the idea of letting others critique my work with questions; "what's working"..."what's not working"...and "what IF."
I cannot tell when you posted this, but I know I am late to the party. However, I have to say that there was only ONE part of your original painting that really, really stuck out for me, and here's why. I live in the extreme southeast region of Virginia, otherwise known as Tidewater. So as you might imagine, I am not very familiar with the geography of New Zealand. As a consequence, when I first saw this painting, I thought the glacier was WATER, so to me it seemed to be defying gravity, floating somehow.. I was puzzled that no one mentioned it until you began to comment on glaciers. THEN the lights went on, and I had to laugh at myself. I just thought you might want to know that the particular portion where the glacier originally sat may not "read" as ice for a lot of people. THANK YOU SO MUCH for posting this. You are one of those rare people: an artist who is not afraid of criticism, who is "real," along with being (I think) one of THE most talented artists I have seen these days. Thanks again....Susanne
WOW! That is gorgeous! I wish I could paint like that! :) No worries... I will some day
Maybe the tarzan, hahaha. André, don't take anything away and don't add... She's perfect, I want to get lost there. Paint a new canvas of the comments. Hug from Porto-Portugal.
That original is stunning! Put that tree back in on the right and don't change a thing! 😁... You drew me into this life changing, breathtaking view, captured the essence of it's beauy, then want to take it away? I don't think so... 😉 I really liked your openness and willingness to have some fun with being "Critiqued" but all those changes were hard to take!.. Thank you for all your amazing video's!
I wouldn't take being likened to Bob Ross as a compliment. Perhaps it is because I am a much deeper character and thus painter. I would put Bob Ross in the same league as Rolf Harris. Could they paint like Caravaggio, nowhere near. They are too light to paint like that and I hate light paintings. However, you painting landscapes colourfully, some people will make that connection. I wouldn't because you have far greater knowledge. Not a chancer!
Who else in the world would have done what you just did, invited whoever's to critique your work.? You are an exceptional person with the exceptional Talent an exceptional paintings. Love your videos. Thank you.
You have entered the realm of "The Hoff". Now all that's left is the "Dimension of the Shat".
Good luck and Godspeed.
In landscapes so many painters, have develop his own ways, to realized a form to paint.
John Constable in XIX century, is one of my favourite. There no PC or Photoshop in that time. Is amazing what he done, imagine countryside In East Anglia, along Stur River.
So many studys he paint in watercolor, clouds, banks rivers, mountains, before to start in oils . His preparations from diferent vues, values, colors, shapes. His techniques get admiration even today. Worry from diferent tonals colors with in use of photoshop, are the less, to me. From Art books we can learn also.
Andrew! The bird would destroy the realistic scene. But I agree with "more depth". To increase the distance between the rocks - bringing the front rocks closer would be one solution, but it requires a lot of painting and change of perspective. What does NOT require that and creates more depth is a branch or two, hanging into the picture. There you can play with light and shadow and make it look really close without changing the "background" perspective. BUT: It must be on the left side, because that's where the landscape is already close to the viewer!
Honestly, my biggest fear when I do changes like that is always to cover the best. So, leaving it like it is would also work. Indeed, it is perfect. From all the ideas I heard I'd prefer Andrew Mansell or certainly Andrew Tischler. CURT.
@Andrew Tischler I think you are incredibly talented and so very generous with your Patreon fee, unlike so many artists on YT who ask so much more but have far less talent. I love watching your videos and hearing what you have to say. Your presentation is brilliant. Unfortunately, the last time I tried oil was in the Caribbean, and I got home one day and my rubbish painting had slid off the canvas onto the floor with the heat. Yep. I think it looked better on the floor. My real love is watercolour (I'm also rubbish at that). Watercolour. Colour. I like bright colours. When I returned to the UK from the Caribbean, landed at the airport, I said, "Who turned the lights off?" All the colour had gone. Colour, which is so magical. Now when I looked at the painting at 6:57 my eyes lit up. Pop. Colour. Have you even seen the art by Alfredo Rodriguez? I think you know what I am saying. I will shut up now and get back in my amateur corner. 🤐
Andrew, I sent the previous message on my wife’s computer. She is Dee Raby and I am Jack Raby . She loves your work as well.
Are you using oils or acrylics? I have worked with both, I like acrylics because of the drying time and layering effects you can get.
Thanks for the lessons. You are a fantastic painter and an interesting presenter thank you. What is your take on Richard Musgrave Evans from Australia. He’s a pallet knife painter and really caught my eye one day.
Looks nice. I'll favor the waterfall in your original I favor the waterfall way in the background in your Reginal. Your original painting looks more natural. It doesn't look as if it was fixed, are created as a perfect standard. I very much favor your original painting!
Wow! it was worth the critic! it makes sense, it has the "S" shape water flow..I get it. I have to share a true experience I had several years ago in L.A. Museum of Art I'm pretty sure it was there. They had a John Singer Sargent exhibit (also one of my favorite artists) in which one of his paintings/watercolors was a scene of closeup rocks with rushing water.. I don't know what it was about that painting that every time I saw it I had to go and get a drink of water as I became very thirsty. I just couldn't get my eyes off that painting/watercolor. I would leave that area gawked at other of his paintings and had to go back to see that one particular water scene, and again I had to go and drink some more water. After I saw your painting and at mid-waterfall and following it down, I got thirsty and took me back to those particular paintings (watercolor)? of Sargent's. I believe they're "Mountain Torrent, Mountain Stream, Glacier stream and Mountain waterfall) I believe these were in the exhibit. So, if your painting got me to go get a drink of water, Sargent better move aside a little, The Tisch has arrived. Thank you very much for a great and very educational video. Take care!
Hi Andrew. You are an accomplished artist, painter and craftsman. I know a thing or two about art and painting (sorry if I sound pretentious, but it’s true). If I had your exceptional talent, I would tell my critics where to go. At this stage in your career, there is no need to heed the peanut gallery. Sure, your students are talented, but very uptight. If it were for them, the Impressionists and Post-Impressionist, Vang Goh and all those who followed would never have picked up a brush to paint and that would have been a great loss for art. I enjoy watching your video. I like your work ethics. You are a true professional, just like the “old masters” You are a remarkably talented young master, sot tell those well-meaning conceited students or critics to can it. Don lose you sleep over it.
I really liked this video. Thank you for sharing your amazing job!!
Too many chefs spoil the broth 🤷🏻♂️
There are no bears in New Zealand?! Someone needs to ship some to you for extra fluffiness!
Also, the intro is as epic as I am an impressionist: super epic. Super entertaining :)
No, we're good thanks. No real nasty creatures here other than humans. We like it that way. Going out for a walk and worrying about bears, snakes, crocodiles, lions, tigers, wolves, you name it, thanks but no thanks.
@@PetrikNZ are you sure? It could spice things up a little. You know, a snake bite here, a spider bite there... Fun! LOL. Just kidding. It must be really nice to relax in the outdoors like that. Here in the USA, we have beautiful, wide open spaces, enormous mountains, breathtaking beaches, and the beasts to match. :)
I wish I could visit New Zealand. I'll bet it's amazing.
I have a theory based on a comment by an old art teacher who said one doesn't commission a painting of oneself from Rembrandt, one gets a improvisation of oneself as Rembrandt. He meant that Rembrandt invariably inserted his own likeness into the portrait.
Through 40 years of my own art practice in landscape/portraiture and still life, my curiosity about my teachers comment led me to believe ( and it bears peer reviewing of this theory) that almost all painters inject a kind of likeness into their works (most obvious in landscape) of themselves. ie: bald head=clear open sky.....asymmetric face=asymmetric landscape......dark complexion[hair/skin=low key painting [alternatively light complexion=high key painting], elemental weights and their placement according to facial build (eg: close set eyes/long nose/high or low cheek bones) etc.
This is to say that personal preference when choosing and designing a composition and key seem more the personal discrimination of the artist based on their own physical appearance and individual ego.
Also, their seems to be a consistency in the choice of composition, particularly when it comes to directional flow eg: water or road leading off the right corner/edge or the left.
This is a working theory and I'd be interested to know what others think of this concept and if it has any logical or even legitimate weight. I might add that a recognizable image in painting or photo of an artist and comparing them to their catalogs of works helped me in determining my theory.
It has helped me when I am commissioned to do works for clients who have entirely different complexions/facial structures to myself. Ordinarily, darker complexion featured clients prefer darker keyed paintings etc.
If you lasted this long in my wordy essay, well done you and thanks.
Hope you have a video about NFT , or interview about it. How can we relate as traditional artist in this modern world. Thanks Andrew. More Powers
Don't know if you've caught a young man on UA-cam named Slew? He built a Tischler wall.
That intro 😂
Your videos have such quality!!
I agree with your wife Rachel! I love the idea of the glacier and the way it was it gives us an Overlook a huge view rather of a huge landscape which is hugely beautiful I liked it the way it was the best. Myself. of course I know that you're having fun with the Tish thing😂😂😂
❤❤❤👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Critiquing you would be like telling Eddie Van Halen how to play guitar. If I could paint a small fraction as good as you I'd be thrilled.
This is a B.U.TI.FUL breath taking scene!!
But it does need some sun rays breaking through those clouds... Lots of sun shine with it shining on all the leaves of the trees. Almost like a Thomas Kinkaid.
I agree with your wife. One thing I hate and mean my absolute hate is seeing tattoos on people specially women. I make me puke. Even died hair, piercing or ANTYING unnatural. That is because I know she has altered her look and it is not real and since my eyes are looking for sings up beauty not some horrible markings or fake paint then it spoils is all. So even if you modify you painting for BETTER, it is no longer what you saw and that makes it an imaginary painting and when I look at that painting I am no longer seeing the reality, so you might as well draw some pretty aliens in UFO there.
Altering anything will change its reality. For example if you add a water fall in the middle it may never work that way in reality, you assumed it. So in a subtle way you are changing the laws of physics. I remember reading a article where all the horses in very old paintings had very small heads because it was thought they look ugly with big heads so they have changed the laws of nature and that is very bad.
Landscapes must ALWAYS be real. The only thing you need to do is take the picture at the right time and right angle.
Awesome Andrew, love the new update composition. Impressive mate..
I greatly admire your expertise, but think landscapes in narrow portrait format are always difficult. I think the basic problem is that you have two paintings here, one of a glacier and one of a river, which you are trying to amalgamate into one. So you have two ‘stars of the show’. Each tends to be in one half of the painting. If you want the focus to be the glacier then if you lop off the bottom quarter of the painting, the compositional problem disappears. If you want to highlight the river, then the glacier needs to be downplayed or removed, which would be a less interesting painting . If maintaining the existing format, getting the composition to ‘flow’ in the final version of the painting is difficult. My eye initially goes straight to the dark toned rock almost in the middle of the painting (squint!) and then to the very prominent dead tree. From there it goes upwards to the glacier then down the right hand ridge line and back to the central rock, picks up the light toned waterfall and follows left to the minor left hand waterfall, upwards and round again. This circular motion is ‘helped’ by the dark rocks to the right. The eye has to ‘jump’ out of this circular flow to get to the bottom of the canvas to explore all of the painting. There somehow needs to be a break in this circular flow to send the eye downwards. (How??) (In some respects your first version had a better flow as the tree edges on the right led your eye downwards). Alternatively if the major tonal contrasts were to be lower on the canvas then the eye would start there and flow upwards through the painting quite effectively - more conventional but less interesting? Humbly yours, FW.
Thank you. I’ve just discovered you and have been watching some of you videos and I’ve learned so much. I can not say thank you enough.
I love both pictures. But I would like to see more clear sky 😉 While I have your attention. Can you please leave your websites on longer please? I would love to be able to watch a full video but I can never seem to find your website!
Thank you for your time
Lynn
man, I believe it's been a year since I last saw one of your videos. Good to see what's going on with you, again.
You know what I think….as someone who also paints? I think there isn’t a painting anywhere that can’t be changed if you pick at it long enough.
I love your work….I like how YOU see a scene and wouldn’t change one single thing.
The 2 d painting is nice. It just doesn’t draw me in and have the “ forest feel” that I got with the first one. In the end,it’s just a matter of opinion is ‘nt it and there are as many as there are viewers. Bottom line…..paint it as YOU see and feel it and I’m going to love it!
Well…so many comments, what can I add?
This was a great idea as a critical analysis …and what you get is a car designed by a committee.
Instead of a master of creativity, design and emotive force (which you are). The best way to kill a painting is to overwork it…knowing that razors edge line of when to stop is critical.
I do agree that the trees on each side a bit the same and the middle ground tree needed to go as it was blocking the travel to the background mountains. BUT, you said something was bothering you about this paining…have a glass of wine and sit with it for an hour, you know what to do.
I truly enjoyed this video. Cheers -Greg
If you a german, this whole Tischler being tisched makes even more fun and sense in a way.
Thats because and I think you already know this, Tischler is the german word for the guy who builds Tables (german Tisch) chairs and all the other furniture one may need.
But here it gets a bit deeper.
If you put someone or something to the test, in german it meens you bring it to the table (Tisch)
The Tischler gets tisched is the literally expression of what you guys and gals have done in this video.
Greetings from Germany.
Hello Andrew, is there anyway I could send you a photo of one of my paintings so you can suggest what an appropriate price would be? I need to know the level I’m at, but I can’t quite do it myself. Thank you for all the videos and work you put in for us, I appreciate it so much
What's working: The flow and the movement is wonderful. The sense of realism is spot on. The sense of depth is great and the overall sense of grandeur is awesome. The color of the glacier and the water is awesome. The detail on the cliffside is great (the waterfall back there is very cool) and he rocks in the river are next level.
What's not working: The clouds near the mountain top on the left seem a bit off to me. Their depth isn't quite there. The greens in the forest below could use something although it's hard for me to tell what that would be. It seems a bit to uniform.
What if: What if you added some mist to the foreground near the river? Sometimes, rivers like this can kick up loads of mist as the water works it's way through the large rocks. What if you played with the light in the foreground. This could allow you to break up the monotony of the green in the foliage on the rocks and in the trees without forcing color where it doesn't belong. What if some of this deadwood seen on the left was making it's way down the river? The river here seems quite unabated by anything other than rocks which is usually not the case for mountain streams.
Overall score: 8.5/10
I like the painting as it is tbh. If you ask people to critique something, they’ll often try to be creative with their critiques as if to “give the best critique of all the critiques” but I don’t think it’s required for an artist to seek critiques. If Picasso was alive today and asked for critiques on instagram, most people with chime in with their ideas…which would be a huge mistake for Picasso’s art.
I love it just the way it is! Fantastic. I don't know how you do it there's a lot of green. And it's perfect. Don't believe it you should see my work when I put in a lot of green. It's just a green smear!
Nice video, love the final result. I wonder how NZ is different from N. America, aside from bears. I can see similarities, How is the light different?
Da best honest to goodness tutorials! Hoping to save some $ to have one small artwork of yours !! Success Maestro!!
I am not educated in Art but does every painting and photography really need to have a clearly defined subject (hero) as suggested by some here around 9:22. Can't some compositions just be about the general scenery with no single focal point and still be awesome. Really curious.
My humble opinion (which isn't worth anything) is to stop right here at the block in stage. My personal taste for landscapes is for them to be more impressionistic. Its so easy for a painting with a lot of detail to become too much like those sappy Christmas cards with the cabin and mountain stream and the old pickup truck and a deer. But everybody's tastes are different. I like this new version. With the right hand tree gone, I realize how claustrophobic the original was. Removing the tree opens it up and shows the massiveness of the mountain.
Great videos. I especially like all the soft music in this tutorial. Can you give us musical credits for this video? Just a question...
Hi Andrew, I also use projector for drawing and I have the one that you use but I don’t know how to use the projector exactly according to the size of the canvas, I mean the picture gets out of the canvas sometime and I don’t know how to fix this problem, is there any option in it that I don’t know about it, please help, thanks
Amazing work you have inspired me to get back to painting
Just the block in? 🤯 Do you always sketch in brown? Or does it depend on what you are painting? Can't wait to see the finished painting.
Thank you Andrew enjoyed watching. Love to watch you paint you're a great guy! Great attitude! Good sport! Looks as if you had fun. And I did too. Thank you. Paint your paintings, love it. On occasion I tried to oil paint myself. I started out with the familiar things of landscape. A lot more simple than your work. I can tell you that for sure. LOL now I'm trying what I never used to care for it still life a lot more challenging than I thought. Same as if everything has got to be propped. And most of it is not natural looking. It looks prompt! Landscape is so natural for the most part! Would love it if you would help people like me with painting still life appreciate it much . God bless your little heart!
You're not the Lone Ranger! I never cared for still life either the painter I think I paid and everything else but. It's alive and I was looking for and my paintings. Living things. Now my interest stay alive, it's really not natural you have arrange and consider shadows as well. Challenging for me as well. LOL yes, , Andrew has done on video a few still lives, and I loved it! He's very talented and does beautiful work no matter what he paints. Absolutely brilliant! I wouldn't care it continues to do some more still lives. I also love the painting of the wild horses. Of course not only it's a beautiful work but love the subject as well. He's a master painter of our time! Not only is he a cutie pie, but I love his wit!! Very enjoyable videos.
Oh my. I'll send my dictation comment off without checking. So many mistakes that needs to be corrected. Hope you can understand it. LOL
Everybody's got a comment as well as I, does that make it right, LOL. But it was fun to consider. Thank you Andrew. You're a sweetheart.
Beautiful as always. I like the big tree in it, that has been removed. LOL have you ever considered putting people paintings even an artist with a canvas.? Maybe putting yourself in it. A food for thought.
At first I was like it looks great just the way it is... but after he removed the right tree.. WOW I didn't know it would make that of a drastic difference. So much better
At least you didn't paint over the original. I think there were only two things needed: 1) light and 2) fading the big tree ever so slightly. Now I miss the tree and am not a fan of the added black rock waterfall.
Andrew very good, congratulations 😊
Hey Andrew. Are you going to be doing anything more with Procreate? I think that is a great little painting program seeing that you can take it outside.
Your painting was also just incredible.
The result of your artwork is very interesting to me..Thank you for Sharing this.
Oh look, faces....it almost looks like Mt. Rushmore at the bottom of the mountain. I love the changes.