How to Build a Cheap and Easy Model Airplane that Flies - Version 2.0

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 чер 2024
  • In this video we learn how to build a simple and inexpensive chuck glider from Dollar-Tree foam board and how to optimize it to get a perfect flight.
    Basic of Model Airplane Design Video:
    • How to Design Model Ai...
    Timecodes
    0:00 - Intro
    0:30 - Glider 2.0 Improvements
    1:23 - Materials and Tools
    2:08 - Making the Pieces
    2:50 - Building the Wing
    5:08 - Building the Tail
    5:27 - Building the Fuselage
    6:12 - Final Assembly
    7:15 - Flying the Plane
    8:09 - Weight Distribution
    9:12 - Experimenting with New Designs
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @abdulmueed4013
    @abdulmueed4013 3 місяці тому +2

    Hi, I appreciate your work and efforts to put together aeromodelling understanding, for all those enthusiasts who are looking for insightful, practical and yet economical solution to satisfy their flying hobby. I have just started following your channel...
    Well Done... and keep up the good work...

  • @riovonstahl2869
    @riovonstahl2869 7 місяців тому +2

    uhm, small channel that explain things straignt to the point... subbed!

  • @user-yo7ch4vp6p
    @user-yo7ch4vp6p 7 місяців тому +2

    He is alive!!! YAY!!

  • @my_dear_friend_
    @my_dear_friend_ 7 місяців тому

    Good instructions. Gonna try this design!

  • @artthur8856
    @artthur8856 7 місяців тому

    What a great video,I understood everything!I can now make my planes fly :)

  • @yxhankun
    @yxhankun 4 місяці тому +1

    excellent n informative.

  • @stephenmcdermott4929
    @stephenmcdermott4929 6 місяців тому

    Yay!

  • @FrotanInferno
    @FrotanInferno 7 місяців тому +1

    Hi you linked a website that works out the center of gravity for a simple plane in your last video. What would you put for the sweep distance of a straight tapered wing which is symmetrical? Also does the website tell you where your center of gravity should be or just where it is based on where you’ve placed the wing compared to the tail in the measurements you have to fill in, essentially I’m wondering how you know what the distance between tail and wing leading edge should be for the calculator when you don’t even know where to put it yet based on the Cg since you haven’t calculated it yet

    • @DesignYourOwnAirplanes-xd6lz
      @DesignYourOwnAirplanes-xd6lz  7 місяців тому +2

      The calculator in that link shows where the CG should be for the plane to fly right. To figure out where the CG would be if you built the plane for real, I've started 3D modeling airplane designs in OnShape (free subscription), and assigning densities to the materials. I then add extra weight into the 3D models on the front/back to see how much I'll need to get the CG in the correct place. For a straight, tapered wing that is symmetrical, if I understand your question right, you would have (sweep distance) = (root chord - tip chord) / 2. I hope that helps.

    • @FrotanInferno
      @FrotanInferno 7 місяців тому

      @@DesignYourOwnAirplanes-xd6lz Thank you, for some reason people kept telling me the sweep distance would be zero. On the first point, if it’s telling you what the center of gravity should be, how do you know what the distance between the leading edges should be? Say you have a 1000mm fuselage, you have to put the distance between the leading edges of the wing and horizontal stabilizer in to the calculator. But how do you know what that distance should be in the first place? One another thing if you have the time to answer: when I want to turn my 2D wing designs into 3D ones after using that cg calculator, does the wing-tail ratio I use and the consequent sizes of the wing and tail not affect the cg in anyway? Or will I have to recalculate the cg using the weight moment method

    • @DesignYourOwnAirplanes-xd6lz
      @DesignYourOwnAirplanes-xd6lz  7 місяців тому +1

      @@FrotanInferno You would decide how long you want your tail to be based on what tail volume you want. Slower planes need higher tail volumes (which we'll talk about in a later video). When you make your tail longer you'll have to add more weight on the front to counterbalance it. As for your second question, the calculator uses a relatively simple method to estimate the location of the NP and CG, so it could be off by a bit, especially when you start factoring in airfoil shapes and stuff like that. I've also used XFLR5 (free aerodynamics analysis software) to model plane designs and find the NP and CG locations.

    • @FrotanInferno
      @FrotanInferno 7 місяців тому

      @@DesignYourOwnAirplanes-xd6lzThank you, all this info has been very helpful in my design so far. Can I ask how this calculator takes into account the fuselage? Because the fuselage factors into the center of gravity position doesn’t it? Do you use the values this website gives you and just use that as your wing and tail position or do you have to factor in the fuselage in some other way (like working out the center of gravity yourself with the fuselage and then trying to get the CG where the website recommends) or should you just line up the fuselage center of gravity with the one from the website even if it means the tail isn’t at the end of the fuselage?

    • @DesignYourOwnAirplanes-xd6lz
      @DesignYourOwnAirplanes-xd6lz  7 місяців тому

      @@FrotanInferno I’m pretty sure the calculator doesn’t take into any aerodynamic effects caused by the fuselage. Moving the fuselage relative to the wing and tail is one way to adjust the CG location. I often decide where I want my fuselage to be and then move the weights forward/backwards to get the CG in the right spot.

  • @michellegraciella165
    @michellegraciella165 2 місяці тому +1

    Hello i was wondering what mm is the foam board?

    • @michellegraciella165
      @michellegraciella165 2 місяці тому

      And is it ok if I use a 3mm foam board?

    • @pretzel1006
      @pretzel1006 2 місяці тому

      @@michellegraciella165 Yes, 3mm is fine. Make sure u cut it slow tho, they tend to break pretty easy under force.