Lafayette has good guidance but his rockets stay under 1km so it's no biggie BPS on the other hand is trying for a space shot which not only has enough altitude to reach a airliner but enough payload to shoot it down too
Yeah, people over at Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman are shitting their pants because homeboy is about to democratize Sidewinders & AMRAAM's for less than 1/1000'th the over bloated DOD budget! Now maybe Ukraine can hire Lafayette Systems to start producing MASSIVE quantities of MASSIVE long-range 🚀 to liberate their territory & pound Putin into submission, forcing Putin to sign an UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER of all occupied territory!? 😁👍
other youtubers: "we can't share a lot of information about our process or make the rocket guidance system go after a certain target, that might be classified as a guided missile and subject to sensitive tech export laws and other regulation about possessing advanced weaponry and also we ..." Lafayette: "so here's how i made a guided missile"
To be fair, the math behind these systems isn't crazy. The rest is all public knowledge or fairly simple engineering principles. Basically, it's all out there already if you want to find it
@@rogerrinkavage yea, ik, but it still doesn't change the fact that other UA-camrs tend to be very careful with this subject and also the fact that it's in a legal gray area, But yea, Russia and China and Iran aren't digging through these videos for rocket secrets
Super cool! Also dude I'm telling you, control roll with just one fin! It's so hard to get good roll precision while using all four fins and the pitch/yaw disturbances are basically zero for using 1
Thank you! I was playing around with slightly higher roll gains this flight and you can see the limit cycling towards apogee :( I’ll try using one fin for it next flight, should be fun to compare performance!
People don't talk like that. Surfers were made fun of because they called everyone "bro" and sounded unintelligent. If you want to be taken seriously in life. Don't use "bro" as a replacement for "he/him/his"
@@RedTail1-1 Bro like, no bro takes you seriously either bro, becuase like your telling other bro's what to do, bro. Which is like, so much more not cooler than using bro, bro. Not cool, bro. Bro.
The safety culture that armature rocketeers keep is really awesome. It reminds me of what the RC multirotor hobby was like before the uneducated got hold of drones from DJI and other companies, and governments quickly banned everything. That safety culture will keep the hobby alive and thriving for as long as it is maintained. You guys are awesome!
I agree that people fly where they aren't supposed to and that has caused a *ton* of issues for those of us who practice proper safety. But it's worth mentioning that not everything was perfect before the DJI influx. RC hardware and software has gotten sooo much better, safety-wise in the last few years. I remember a bunch of runaways, wrongly set failsafe modes with never to be seen again equipment, just straight up bugs in esc software, burning drones and whatnot. All the old timers that I know fly without prearm switches and even mentioning it gets met with scepticism. Some hand-launch or even hand-land their drones. It's just a hobby that tends to attract slightly insane people 😂
Excellent book. My area only covers a single chapter in this book. It does an excellent job of describing the fundamentals of ....something, but there is a LOT more that goes into that particular system and "how the sausage is really made".
It's quite fascinating that currently we have resources available for the general public to build a rocket brain like this :D Imagine doing that in 1950's
Back in the 2000's there was a guy in New Zealand who built a pulse-jet rocket using only parts ordered online. Supposedly it would fly up to 160km and deliver a 10kg "package". Apparently this guy took part in a British TV show called Scrapheap Challenge. He constructed a working pulse-jet out of scrap in about 10 hours. It was then attached to a kart that got up to 64km/h
@@ralphm6901 a pulse jet is the most basic form of jet engine anyone can make one you literally just bend a metal pipe into a long u shape and a fuel source in the middle
@@BobaPhettamine It's also easy to make a torch using a lighter and a Febreze can, doesn't mean it will perform as well as an oxyacetylene kit. A pulse jet that can reach 64km/h and a whole *Switzerland* worth of range is nothing to sneeze at.
@@kiq4767 that's what I was implying. They know he can build this shit, so either accept a lockheed martin job offer, or spontaneously go on an extended vacation/impromptu "retirement"
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
not at all. nothing state of the art about this. this is actually very archaic tech compared to what is current state of the art. We've had more advanced rocketry and missiles back in WW2.
In Germany for example, building an amateur rocket with any kind of control mechanism able to actively modify the flight path is illegal, and you'd get into very serious trouble for it (possibly jail time), because it's considered military weapons technology here. Kudos for including that section on laws and safety at the end of the video!
Anything sideways you'll have people at your door. Straight up and you can do some neat stuff without too many issues, assuming you clear everything with FFA above a certain level. I think it's sad that it's not encouraged in a safe manner. There's so much to be learned by tests like this
Actually the video is wrong in that regard. I know he said he checked multiple times, but there's this little thing called the USML, a part of the federal code of regulations. Normal model rockets are exempt from this because they rely on passive stability to maintain flight and are made of lightweight materials therefore are not a guided missile as defined within 22 CFR Part 121.1, category IV. The exclusion note specifically says model rockets shall not contain active control i.e. RF/GPS/etc. I work in aerospace for a living and we must abide by both ITAR for export purposes but also the USML as a categorical definition.
i allways thought there was a reaons for youtube rockets to go only go up, i think youre reaaallyyy pushing the limit here, i love it i'm downloading this
Fins are incredibly difficult to use for rocket guidance because they give you an enormous power of steering in all axis. 1 degree off and your rocket will break under the high g forces… This rocket is a masterpiece!
You and BPS Space need to talk, he’s building up to a space shot, some of your R&D would probably be useful. Also please post some sort of articles for fellow amateurs to implement and understand what you have built, please. I’d love to understand the electronics and code side of this better to basically do the same thing but with side mounted cameras. Not saying share code btw just understanding concepts and software language better in context to these sorts of things.
My favorite part of your projects, especially compared to others, is that you are repeating the flights to some degree. For example the self-land projects all seem to never fly after the first successful landing. So I'm really glad to see you reach an objective then set a new related goal and keep flying that concept.
Holy crap I did not know you could casually just put step by step instructions on building a homemade guided missile on youtube and not get disappeared
"I am not supplying code, cad or PCB files for this project." BORING how else am I supposed to make ballistic weapons that can hit a fly a continent away????? Fund my own researchers???? Cringe.
I am constantly impressed with how good off the shelf electronic hardware has become. Years ago and in another life, this would require an inertial navigation system so heavy this rocket could not lift it. Then MEMS systems get better and better and better as well as available to nearly anyone. Plus they weigh very little and a few other good things. Cool to see someone playing around and seeing whats possible. All the sam, mind your P's and Q's or the wrong people will take notice.
You’ve done an impressive job on this! In the olden days, there was a design called the Sun Seeker, which used a photocell to aim generally “up.” Not sophisticated, but it was in reach for amateurs with a soldering iron.
I was at Muncie,on 4th flight,I have your video on my ch. Cool stuff back in the day we couldn't have Guidance due to 911. I'd love to print your rocket for my fun.
You have a Cool Channel and Project. I love those *_DIGI XBee radio Modems,_* I used a lot of the Digi modems, I started using them back when they were still called *_Maxstream_* long before Digi bought them. I used the frequency hopping spread spectrum, the direct sequence spread spectrum and the XBee. But I like the 900 MHz direct sequence the best. I used them the on my UAV's for the control links and data down links. On one trip to Australia while we were conducting test for the Australian Outback Rescue, we tracked one of our UAV’s over *_20 kilometers_* using a pair of one Watt 900 MHz Digi direct sequence spread spectrum modems. We were the first team to fly into and come back from the Outback Rescue search area. I used the direct sequence spread spectrum modems on my redundant spread spectrum R.C. link. I could configure a redundant system for *_900 MHz or 2.4 GHz or a combination of both 900 and 2.4._* I had the same issue the *_ITAR police,_* I was doing this in the late 1990's to mid 2000's I had all kinds of visitors from all kinds of 3 letter agencies. This was long before most people knew what a UAV or a drone was and I would get reported to these agencies on a regular basis. At first it was scary but after a while it became a pain in the ASS.
At time 7:27 accidental is misspelled…just minor thing. Love the full video, description, etc. What you have accomplished is what we dreamed of 60+ yrs ago…back when red one transistor radios with a white wired earpiece. to hear Sputnik beeps as it passed overhead.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
Wait.... Are you saying the US State department & Pentagon In all actuality DO NOT sit at their desks watching BPS Space & Lafayette Systems UA-cam 🚀🚀 videos!? 😁😁😜😜😜
And many advanced technologies will not let you know. Just like Snowden's PRISM , it is basically impossible for you to know if it is not exposed. This is just nothing Intellectual freedom is not actually free, and is not freedom of speech.
Damn I love your videos so much Pls keep it up btw, the AIM-9s have a control system, which are increaseing their control athority step by step after launch. Seems lke a good idea for Diamond-X as well
17:25 I was just going to say it looked like it had an infill structure! Getting into 3d printing and I love rockets. I am looking into integrating the Aim 9 sidewinder fin wheels gyroscopic correction system into a model.
put a photovoltaic sensor on the rocket body and point a laser to a know position in space so that its pierce point is on the waypoint trajectory. reference the simulated reference(from flight controller) to the triggered results detected from the laser. collect enough resulting differences at different positions to calculate the range of certainty. awesome build.
We have been making "video" guided rockets and drones for the past 9 years using both visual and IR cameras and combined the two recently. No gps or rf jammers to worry about. 😂😂 I'm currently working on a multiple spectrum system now that combines many different spectrums to make them even more fail safe. 😊
You should setup an algorithm verification pipeline which tests the control sw in sim everytime you make a change. It is a bit more work in the beginning but will pay thicc dividends in the end. Cheers!
People in the 90s: its rocket science. People in 2024: here is a youtube video about rocked guidance, open to the public, for free. Made by an amateur.
And THAT'S how you get a free flight! Well, if you consider a rendition flight to a black site a free flight... 😉 But seriously: this is incredible. I can understand all the other "hobbyists" staying away from adding guidance to their rockets, but it's both amazing and scary to see somebody Just Do It™. PS: Now add optical targeting and open source it! 😁
Instead of printing parts at 100% infill, print them with 99 walls (obviously that many walls won't actually print) - walls provide strength along the axis you need for the application of chute line anchor.
Random idea but maybe for the silo have it jettisoned out in a manner similar to what destroyers have. There's the initial launch to get it out of the tube then the rockets ignition kicks in to prevent damage to the tube. That may resolve the problem of wrecking it.
BPS: I’m being intentionally vague so I don’t piss off ITAR police
Lafayette:
Real
beyond based
This is mostly showing the results, the BPS guy actually shows details of his design and build process.
ITAR compliance is for cowards
Lafayette has good guidance but his rockets stay under 1km so it's no biggie
BPS on the other hand is trying for a space shot which not only has enough altitude to reach a airliner but enough payload to shoot it down too
Man, being the DOD guy who gets to monitor your channel must be a sweet gig.
Yeah, people over at Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman are shitting their pants because homeboy is about to democratize Sidewinders & AMRAAM's for less than 1/1000'th the over bloated DOD budget!
Now maybe Ukraine can hire Lafayette Systems to start producing MASSIVE quantities of MASSIVE long-range 🚀 to liberate their territory & pound Putin into submission, forcing Putin to sign an UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER of all occupied territory!? 😁👍
You misspelled "FBI"
@@blurglide
You misspelled "ATF"
That's me. I honestly don't care. We will give him this technology if he would ask.
@@kevinroberts781 can I have one?
other youtubers: "we can't share a lot of information about our process or make the rocket guidance system go after a certain target, that might be classified as a guided missile and subject to sensitive tech export laws and other regulation about possessing advanced weaponry and also we ..."
Lafayette: "so here's how i made a guided missile"
Can you inbox me senior
Hello, Mr. FBI Agent. Can I interest you in a deposition?👉😏👈
To be fair, the math behind these systems isn't crazy. The rest is all public knowledge or fairly simple engineering principles.
Basically, it's all out there already if you want to find it
@@rogerrinkavage yea, ik, but it still doesn't change the fact that other UA-camrs tend to be very careful with this subject and also the fact that it's in a legal gray area,
But yea, Russia and China and Iran aren't digging through these videos for rocket secrets
Private Citizen go brrrrr
Super cool! Also dude I'm telling you, control roll with just one fin! It's so hard to get good roll precision while using all four fins and the pitch/yaw disturbances are basically zero for using 1
Thank you! I was playing around with slightly higher roll gains this flight and you can see the limit cycling towards apogee :( I’ll try using one fin for it next flight, should be fun to compare performance!
Ayy,it's my boy Joseph Bizzlington
J-Bizz with the Hot Tips!
@@MaximumMatador The Barn Boy (Barnard) doesn't miss
@@LafayetteSystems
Can you please inbox me
Yooo....according to bro ITAR stands for "I Talk About Rockets".
😂😂😂
People don't talk like that. Surfers were made fun of because they called everyone "bro" and sounded unintelligent. If you want to be taken seriously in life. Don't use "bro" as a replacement for "he/him/his"
@@RedTail1-1 Bro like, no bro takes you seriously either bro, becuase like your telling other bro's what to do, bro. Which is like, so much more not cooler than using bro, bro. Not cool, bro.
Bro.
@@RedTail1-1 No one cares that much about someone saying bro. Go outside big dog.
💀💀💀💀
Dude is building a sidewinder missile
Not really.
@@meanman6992 though he might be building a FPV, hot launched, ducted fan, cruise miss.... I mean drone
Dude wants the dude get arrested
Looks more like an R-77 tbh
Ssssshhhhhh
The safety culture that armature rocketeers keep is really awesome. It reminds me of what the RC multirotor hobby was like before the uneducated got hold of drones from DJI and other companies, and governments quickly banned everything. That safety culture will keep the hobby alive and thriving for as long as it is maintained. You guys are awesome!
I agree that people fly where they aren't supposed to and that has caused a *ton* of issues for those of us who practice proper safety. But it's worth mentioning that not everything was perfect before the DJI influx. RC hardware and software has gotten sooo much better, safety-wise in the last few years. I remember a bunch of runaways, wrongly set failsafe modes with never to be seen again equipment, just straight up bugs in esc software, burning drones and whatnot. All the old timers that I know fly without prearm switches and even mentioning it gets met with scepticism. Some hand-launch or even hand-land their drones. It's just a hobby that tends to attract slightly insane people 😂
All I'm gonna say is "Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance vol 6 "
It’s only a two volume set, and there is a 7th edition out now. $119 for both volumes from the publisher, which is a steal IMHO.
@@firstmkb There's a 7th edition? I'm getting a copy, those books are insanely detailed, it almost feels like your reading something classified lol.
Lol, i seem to see you on these types of videos, I think the last one I saw one of your comments was on The most expensive Medication.
@@firstmkb Damn it, how does AIAA always seem to get a cut of my paycheck........
Excellent book. My area only covers a single chapter in this book. It does an excellent job of describing the fundamentals of ....something, but there is a LOT more that goes into that particular system and "how the sausage is really made".
It's quite fascinating that currently we have resources available for the general public to build a rocket brain like this :D Imagine doing that in 1950's
Back in the 2000's there was a guy in New Zealand who built a pulse-jet rocket using only parts ordered online. Supposedly it would fly up to 160km and deliver a 10kg "package".
Apparently this guy took part in a British TV show called Scrapheap Challenge. He constructed a working pulse-jet out of scrap in about 10 hours. It was then attached to a kart that got up to 64km/h
@@ralphm6901 a pulse jet is the most basic form of jet engine anyone can make one you literally just bend a metal pipe into a long u shape and a fuel source in the middle
@@BobaPhettamine It's also easy to make a torch using a lighter and a Febreze can, doesn't mean it will perform as well as an oxyacetylene kit. A pulse jet that can reach 64km/h and a whole *Switzerland* worth of range is nothing to sneeze at.
twinks with arduinos couldve destroyed the soviet union
@@BobaPhettamine I mean if you want to be simplistic you can describe everything that way.
I’m still impressed you just got the flight control system to keep the rocket from spinning! The other stuff is just, wow…. 🤯
You are 100% on a watchlist! Great vids!
We’re all 100% on a watch list. Lol
We all are now 💀
Late to the party boys.
😂
This is one of the most professional rocketry video I’ve ever seen on UA-cam 👍
Wish I could hit the thumbs-up more than once! Very professional and clear. Thank you.
Bros a walking ITAR violation
Bro's getting a job offer he _can't_ refuse from lockheed martin
@@Bomkz better than getting an offer he can't refuse
@@kiq4767 that's what I was implying. They know he can build this shit, so either accept a lockheed martin job offer, or spontaneously go on an extended vacation/impromptu "retirement"
@@Bomkz Retirement huh... Is that what they call the "guy that fell off a window in Russia" in the US?
@@SoloRenegade if there is any knowledge being forbidden then we have a revolution objective bois
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
Wow I knew that someone would know this. That video explaining rocket guidance is amazing
Ah, good. Someone already made the joke, so I don't have to.
... But how does it initially know where it was, if it never knows where it is?
@@MilitiaStateArmory ...because it knows where it isn't
Douglas Adams?
My curiosity won, and now I'm on the DOD's watchlist
Raytheon told me they would like to talk you
As the FBI...and the Chinese Ministry of State Security...and the FSB...and two guys who claim to be from ISIS.
It's encouraging to see someone move the state of the art of rocketry ahead....good work!!
not at all. nothing state of the art about this. this is actually very archaic tech compared to what is current state of the art. We've had more advanced rocketry and missiles back in WW2.
@@SoloRenegade Regardless....when everyone else does the same thing over and over, you're doing it differently...and better!!
@@captjohnny yes, that I agree with. he's way ahead of other amateur rocketry hobbyists, and even many universities.
@@SoloRenegade Agreed!!
super impressive. extremely high level engineering. its gotta be so satisfying seeing your guidance system working in the air.
In Germany for example, building an amateur rocket with any kind of control mechanism able to actively modify the flight path is illegal, and you'd get into very serious trouble for it (possibly jail time), because it's considered military weapons technology here. Kudos for including that section on laws and safety at the end of the video!
Anything sideways you'll have people at your door. Straight up and you can do some neat stuff without too many issues, assuming you clear everything with FFA above a certain level.
I think it's sad that it's not encouraged in a safe manner. There's so much to be learned by tests like this
I've never heard about such a limitation and couldn't find anything about in on the internet.
Actually the video is wrong in that regard. I know he said he checked multiple times, but there's this little thing called the USML, a part of the federal code of regulations. Normal model rockets are exempt from this because they rely on passive stability to maintain flight and are made of lightweight materials therefore are not a guided missile as defined within 22 CFR Part 121.1, category IV. The exclusion note specifically says model rockets shall not contain active control i.e. RF/GPS/etc. I work in aerospace for a living and we must abide by both ITAR for export purposes but also the USML as a categorical definition.
@@nicdesbias If you live in the US, check out www.ecfr.gov/current/title-22/chapter-I/subchapter-M/part-121, category IV.
tell me something that is not illegal in germany :D
i allways thought there was a reaons for youtube rockets to go only go up, i think youre reaaallyyy pushing the limit here, i love it
i'm downloading this
Fins are incredibly difficult to use for rocket guidance because they give you an enormous power of steering in all axis. 1 degree off and your rocket will break under the high g forces… This rocket is a masterpiece!
The missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn't! 😂
Came for this comment, was not disappointed.
You and BPS Space need to talk, he’s building up to a space shot, some of your R&D would probably be useful. Also please post some sort of articles for fellow amateurs to implement and understand what you have built, please. I’d love to understand the electronics and code side of this better to basically do the same thing but with side mounted cameras. Not saying share code btw just understanding concepts and software language better in context to these sorts of things.
they already do. We are all in the same discord channel.
@@ThePhantomRocket can you give the link for discord channel?
Give the dc link pls
@@shivayyahiremath2622it’s through the BPS Patreon
@@ThePhantomRocketlink?
Thanks!
0.00001 nanosecond after he post it
The ATF: *KNOCK KNOCK*
ATF? fuck try DOD, DOJ, DHS, FBI, US Department of State. All of them will sending hit squads, sorry, sorry... officers to execute search warrants.
My favorite part of your projects, especially compared to others, is that you are repeating the flights to some degree. For example the self-land projects all seem to never fly after the first successful landing. So I'm really glad to see you reach an objective then set a new related goal and keep flying that concept.
Holy crap I did not know you could casually just put step by step instructions on building a homemade guided missile on youtube and not get disappeared
Your production quality is getting better as fast as the guidance system! Keep it up! Love your videos! 🚀
"I am not supplying code, cad or PCB files for this project." BORING how else am I supposed to make ballistic weapons that can hit a fly a continent away????? Fund my own researchers???? Cringe.
This is a company’s UA-cam channels
😂😂agreed
He does not want to commit an ITAR export violation.
@@tikitimecringe
@@tikitimeguess simple Python codes will be part of that then… GitHub bout to shut down 😂
I am constantly impressed with how good off the shelf electronic hardware has become. Years ago and in another life, this would require an inertial navigation system so heavy this rocket could not lift it. Then MEMS systems get better and better and better as well as available to nearly anyone. Plus they weigh very little and a few other good things. Cool to see someone playing around and seeing whats possible. All the sam, mind your P's and Q's or the wrong people will take notice.
You’ve done an impressive job on this! In the olden days, there was a design called the Sun Seeker, which used a photocell to aim generally “up.” Not sophisticated, but it was in reach for amateurs with a soldering iron.
The Rocket knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it is not. It knows this due to the Navigation system.
Have the alphabet people knocked on your door yet? This thing is sweet.
He’s good there’s no talking between the camera and the flight control system.
lmao, what a description
What do trans people have to do with rockets?
Wrong alphabet. More like "lettered" ay jensies
@@larryfisherman6449 3-letter agencies, not 4+ letter whatever
Bro's building the next-gen Iron Dome or Patriot Battery at home.
Keep it up, excellent work, mate!
Nice work. The level of control is impressive. Those onboard camera sounds are sweet.
This is gonna be a banger.
Thanks for the tutorial! I'll go build a guided missle right now.
Great video. well made. I wish all videos are made as well as this one. Content was also good.
The sound recordings from the rocket are great!
idk why but the fact that he uses names like Data Link and INS is amazing, probably because i'm using to hearing it when i'm playing DCS but i love it
You should strap a FPV video system on one of your rockets and go along for the ride!
You are making and doing cool stuff!!!!!
Well done. Need a steerable chute to bring it back to the launch pad.
I was at Muncie,on 4th flight,I have your video on my ch. Cool stuff back in the day we couldn't have Guidance due to 911. I'd love to print your rocket for my fun.
As a flight instructor I’d have a heart attack seeing that get launched. 😂
Haven’t even watched the vid yet and I’m less than 30 seconds in and i already subscribed, this is the kind of content I love to find on UA-cam
I remember when Mark Rober tried making something and someone in defense told him it was illegal to do so 😂
this guy has either a million recruiters in his inbox or already an amazing job
Excellent work. Very professional
We shoudl seriously turn this into a hobby just like how drones and RC Planes turned to a hobby.
This would be so much fun.
Did you drop the /s?
Bro doesn't know amateur rocketry is a hobby. Check this guy out! 😂
You have a Cool Channel and Project.
I love those *_DIGI XBee radio Modems,_* I used a lot of the Digi modems, I started using them back when they were still called *_Maxstream_* long before Digi bought them. I used the frequency hopping spread spectrum, the direct sequence spread spectrum and the XBee. But I like the 900 MHz direct sequence the best. I used them the on my UAV's for the control links and data down links. On one trip to Australia while we were conducting test for the Australian Outback Rescue, we tracked one of our UAV’s over *_20 kilometers_* using a pair of one Watt 900 MHz Digi direct sequence spread spectrum modems. We were the first team to fly into and come back from the Outback Rescue search area.
I used the direct sequence spread spectrum modems on my redundant spread spectrum R.C. link. I could configure a redundant system for *_900 MHz or 2.4 GHz or a combination of both 900 and 2.4._* I had the same issue the *_ITAR police,_* I was doing this in the late 1990's to mid 2000's I had all kinds of visitors from all kinds of 3 letter agencies. This was long before most people knew what a UAV or a drone was and I would get reported to these agencies on a regular basis. At first it was scary but after a while it became a pain in the ASS.
At time 7:27 accidental is misspelled…just minor thing. Love the full video, description, etc. What you have accomplished is what we dreamed of 60+ yrs ago…back when red one transistor radios with a white wired earpiece. to hear Sputnik beeps as it passed overhead.
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
It's good he called it "Waypoints" not "Targets"
Waypoint is stationary. Targets is another objective but will come later in this series.
wow that’s gotta be the coolest thing i’ve ever seen
It's crazy how many people don't understand ITAR
Wait.... Are you saying the US State department & Pentagon In all actuality DO NOT sit at their desks watching BPS Space & Lafayette Systems UA-cam 🚀🚀 videos!? 😁😁😜😜😜
people are joking
And many advanced technologies will not let you know. Just like Snowden's PRISM , it is basically impossible for you to know if it is not exposed. This is just nothing Intellectual freedom is not actually free, and is not freedom of speech.
Outstanding presentation of the system. Looking forward to Hatchet.
What if your way point is moving like real life scenarios? Love this video and also the safety part.
Sweet!
Probably getting real close to crossing some lines here lol if not already!
Well done!
oh a 3d print broke? what else is new. (great video and demo by the way, you are shooting for the stars :)
Fantastic vid. Really cool tech and amazing footage. The last video to were cool but this one was next level. Can’t wait for the next.
This is motivating me to try and make a guided missile for my large-scale RC planes
I think that might be a crime
Skymaster F-14’s chasing each other with functioning sparrows would be the future of xtreme sports!
@@Gl1tchy_B01_09 Yeah, I'm not gonna actually do that. Just in theory.
Damn I love your videos so much
Pls keep it up
btw, the AIM-9s have a control system, which are increaseing their control athority step by step after launch. Seems lke a good idea for Diamond-X as well
This reminds me of the bleed air on the fins of some soviet missiles (igla? Or was strela)
@@nikolaideianov5092what do you mean ?
Great work so far! I can't wait to see the next few flights!
17:25 I was just going to say it looked like it had an infill structure! Getting into 3d printing and I love rockets. I am looking into integrating the Aim 9 sidewinder fin wheels gyroscopic correction system into a model.
The rocket knows where it is, by knowing where it isn’t
Super cool homemade SAM you've built. I feel like just watching this violates ITAR somehow. Anyway keep it up!
Awesome video as allways! 🥳
For representative statistics, it would be great to randomize the waypoints👍(maybe within a certain radius)
Dude is certainly on an NSA watchlist
bro made a quality video with powerpoint
Bro has a guaranteed job anywhere he wants
Congratulations 🎉
Welcome to the 3 letter agencies list 😂
put a photovoltaic sensor on the rocket body and point a laser to a know position in space so that its pierce point is on the waypoint trajectory. reference the simulated reference(from flight controller) to the triggered results detected from the laser. collect enough resulting differences at different positions to calculate the range of certainty. awesome build.
The rocket knows where it is at all times...
I bet iam on some kind of watchlist now
I'll have to install a few of these on my property so when the neighbors piss me off... lol
Are you using Euler angles (rotated) or are you using quaternions to determine the current orientation of the rocket?
Very cool video!
Truly Awesome! 🎉
We have been making "video" guided rockets and drones for the past 9 years using both visual and IR cameras and combined the two recently. No gps or rf jammers to worry about. 😂😂 I'm currently working on a multiple spectrum system now that combines many different spectrums to make them even more fail safe. 😊
Someone from the government or military complex is ready to hire this dude! If they’re not they should be
love watching people build precision guided missiles in their backyard
Excellent work man, well done.
Homemade sidewinders, I will be following
You should setup an algorithm verification pipeline which tests the control sw in sim everytime you make a change.
It is a bit more work in the beginning but will pay thicc dividends in the end.
Cheers!
People in the 90s: its rocket science. People in 2024: here is a youtube video about rocked guidance, open to the public, for free. Made by an amateur.
Stuff like this illustrates the changing nature of modern warfare.
you have officially blown up and became viral imo
THE MISSILE KNOWS WHERE IT IS
I feel like my FBI agent upgraded my case just from clicking on this.
And THAT'S how you get a free flight! Well, if you consider a rendition flight to a black site a free flight... 😉
But seriously: this is incredible. I can understand all the other "hobbyists" staying away from adding guidance to their rockets, but it's both amazing and scary to see somebody Just Do It™.
PS: Now add optical targeting and open source it! 😁
Instead of printing parts at 100% infill, print them with 99 walls (obviously that many walls won't actually print) - walls provide strength along the axis you need for the application of chute line anchor.
Random idea but maybe for the silo have it jettisoned out in a manner similar to what destroyers have. There's the initial launch to get it out of the tube then the rockets ignition kicks in to prevent damage to the tube. That may resolve the problem of wrecking it.
Child: Can we have an Iron Dome?
Mom: We have an iron dome at home.
I want 6 of these that can hit a target on the ground for the next bbq game of high stakes lawn darts 😂
Finally someone, who said what joe was too afraid to say
Bro's building a ballistic guided missile and hatchet specs sound like a precision guided cruise missile. He got a whole MIC in his garage.
More like amateur missile. Great work!
OMG this is orgasmic. amazing job man.