VERDICT WATCH: MA v. Karen Read Day 32, Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 чер 2024
- LIVE: MA v. #KarenRead - Day 32 - VERDICT WATCH - Jury deliberations continue for a second day on Wednesday. On Tuesday, the jury of six men and six women deliberated for two and a half hours before Judge Cannone sent them for the evening.
00:00:00 On the Record: MA v Karen Read Day 32
00:01:30 Jury Enters Courtroom
00:02:05 Jury Question
00:46:44 Verdict Clock Paused at 5hr 39mins
00:53:13 Back On the Record: MA v Karen Read Day 32
03:39:55 Back On the Record: Verdict Clock Paused
#CourtTV Catch up on all the facts of the case against #KarenRead, Killer Or Cover-Up #MurderTrial. ⚖️👇
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter www.courttv.com/email/
Court TV Podcast www.courttv.com/podcast/
Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks: / @courttv
FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook / courttv
Twitter/X / courttv
Instagram / courttvnetwork
TikTok / courttvlive
UA-cam / courttv
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE www.courttv.com/trials/
HOW TO FIND COURT TV www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/
The judge literally can’t wait for this case to be done so she can go to sleep. Ridiculous…. She’s so unprofessional on another level
Not guilty
Prayers for the O’Keefe family 😢 and for the Read family…such a tragic event. ❤
IT is a tragedy for ALL involved, the families and friends and people of Canton, it's PD, First Responders, Mass State Police, all those men and women in Emergency Services, Law Enforcement who have been so unjustly judged and unfairly maligned over the course of this investigation and trial process
@@AnnMcHale Nope... John O’Keefe is the only victim.
Pray In Jesus Name God intervene with your Justice mercy goodness faithfulness Amen
@@musicismysanctuary5813 Correct! and KAREN READ KILLED HIM
Every resident of Massachusetts should be outraged by this SHAM. This system is a disgrace. You are quite literally witnessing corruption in real time
She worked extremely hard and professionally all the way.
@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_Inspired who? Bev? Nope.
@@BostonMA781 No, the Honorable Beverly Cannone.
So not providing a SERT basically shows the jury the investigation was shoddy. Shame on CantonPD, MSP and DA
It's not in evidence so she can't give it to them.
Ive literally got a scar on my leg from a dog bite from years ago that looks just like his arm. Thats 100% dog bites. If you ever been bit from a dog, you know. There is no maybes to it.
I have one on my arm too and I can tell you I never got a bruise with it. I've also been hit by a car (at a much lower speed) and I was bruised from asshole to breakfast time so . . . .
2 medical examiners said he wasn’t hit by a vehicle. His arm injuries looked like dog bites and claws. 2 experts in reconstruction of accidents said vehicle did not hit him. So not guilty/innocent.. probable dog attacked knocked him dow the stairs and he hit his head. Someone moved him to the yard. Sad they didn’t call it in as an accident. He might have lived . Karen is innocent
Definitely dog attack.
The injuries not adding up tells me everything
00:00:00 On the Record: MA v Karen Read Day 32
00:01:30 Jury Enters Courtroom
00:02:05 Jury Question
00:46:44 Verdict Clock Paused at 5hr 39mins
00:53:13 Back On the Record: MA v Karen Read Day 32
03:39:55 Back On the Record: Verdict Clock Paused
#CourtTV Catch up on all the facts of the case against #KarenRead, Killer Or Cover-Up #MurderTrial. ⚖👇
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/?
The instructions are appalling. The wording is appalling. It's all jiggery pokery. I'd hate to be on that jury.
The defense showed no discomfort with them whatsoever.
Stinky is guilty,
The judge should be fired
Not Guilty. The man was beaten to death and attacked by a large dog…Stevie Wonder can see that. And the audacity of the lead suspect sit in there and intimidate the jury. Shame on the Commonwealth.
@@musicismysanctuary5813 .. I agree he was either beaten or the dog attacked and he fell backward on the stairs hit the back of his head and they carried him outside. If they would have called for help he may have lived. The house was never checked. They re-homed the dog immediately and moved within a couple of days…outrageous
What is most disturbing is the treatment of a downed fellow officer..not EVEN trying to solve the case. No cooperation, got rid of the dog, sold the house, got rid of phones and data…the dishonesty is appalling. Lord Jesus. HELP!
I can’t stand Karen and her arrogant face
True but Karen is still guilty,
Are you really that gullible? The digital evidence submitted in court places O'Keefe motionless in the area close to the dividing line between 32 and 34 Fairview the duration 12.32 and 6.15 when He was recovered. Karen Read's SUV recorded her reversing back over 60 ft at 24 mph hitting him. These pieces of independent indisputable evidence informs what happened to John O'Keefe-only Karen Read can tell us Why.
@@tracychase40you’d be upset too if falsely accused of a crime
That judge needs her robes taken away
I really don't want to see that. 🤮
bom chika wowow
I haven't followed up on the judge. Why is everyone saying she sucks? Genuine question
Lord we are praying 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
FOR JUSTICE
Amen…and justice for John O’Keefe.
This judge is disgusting ...
She has Manipulated this case in the way that the form she gave the Jury has all guilty verdicts and the top one not guilty....
Chief justice should be involved.....
I ask where would this be if not for A Jackson..he caught this as well as the Sally Port video..are the Feds watching-Chief Justice..someone needs to step in here..
Why, because she's not bowing to the defense at every turn?
@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_Inspired Just being neutral would be nice.
@@TheGdav0202 She must pick winners and losers.
@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_Inspired unfair. because she seems to favor defense. 11:41
Please be patient everyone. The judge is tired and needs a fix. Not like someone’s life is at stake here.
She probably has more than once case
Certainly not hers.
@@B-ch6uk would that be important to you if she was proceeding over your case?
Pamprin is more like it. Disgusting and pathetic to meltdown like this!
KR's constant smiling, laughing and smirking should worry you more.
Its not going the way everyone thought it people need to consider the consequences here if they get it wrong. This takes time not 5 minutes like most are thinking
The Jury will do their due diligence-there is 4 weeks testimony to discuss.
I feel like we need a Tom Petty song! “The waiting is the hardest part”
The Commonwealth did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, so not guilty.
That is what it should be... but this Commonwealth... . idk .... no trust in them
@@DAISYCHEWYandMEthe Supreme Court sucks even more!
The Commonwealth is full of corruption!!
25 yrs no parole
They proved the case
I can’t believe they don’t have a verdict
The CW's evidence clearly point to KR's guilt.
Me either. it is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole groups of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,
Maybe there's a person stuck on wanting to know who did it if not Karen....and they don't believe a cover-up would be as easy as it actually was to pull off. The 11 rational people are spending time going over the 5,000 reasons to acquit, and that takes time. Some people are quite irrational and stubborn.
@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_InspiredThe lunatics who hear factual, credible, sensible, common sense evidence that the car didnt strike a person, and John's injuries werent caused by a car, from the best experts in the nation used by the DOD and hired by the DOJ...and STILL refuse to accept their testimony as true - are serving on juries and putting innocent people in prison ALL over...ALL the time.
WHY, then, is this our chosen justice system? Any of us could be imprisoned for something we didn't do because of those jackholes. There are countless accounts of this happening to people who were eventually exonerated upon further investigation. We cannot stand for this. I, for one, don't want these people on my jury if I'm ever falsely accused due to circumstantial evidence or police corruption. I don't want my freedom taken from me because of a few people's blind faith in law enforcement or critique of my facial expressions.
Why would anyone decide to put a decision this important in the hands of a jury with NO prerequisite IQ, education, life experience, or open-mindedness? Why wouldn't they have to pass a thorough screening interview, mental health assessment, psychological evaluation, or emotional intelligence screening? It's absurd. KAREN READ IS ALL OF US.
@@ThatRedhedd t is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole group of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,
JUSTICE FOR JOHN O'KEETH!!!
And so it continues tomorrow. 🙄
She takes temper tantrums and loses it. Plus, intoxication while driving and memory is not clear = DWI. No emotion in court when pic of Johns autopsy and to many giggles and smiles throughout the trial. we may never know the truth. If I was her, I would be scared as hell just to be in this whole situation. and the possibilities of "Who says?" and "What if"
This is RIDICULOUS!!! It shouldn't have even taken them five minutes to decide and five more minutes to mark the "not guilty" box(es). The corruption runs deep in Massachusetts!!!
She’s guilty. How much did she pay you lmfaoooo
As someone who has been on a high-stakes jury before and found the defendant NG, I don't think this is a bad thing. Good jurors want to make sure they have looked at and understood all the evidence before making a decision on someone's life. Remember, this was a 10 week trial with something like 80 witnesses. It was hot in the courthouse. It was hard to hear and hard to see. I'm sure they want to be thorough. I remember for us, the first few hours were simply getting out all our questions and thoughts because we had to keep it to ourselves for so long. Then you sleep on it and think of new things and change your mind. Some people see things differently so we talk it through. The paperwork is also a giant BEAST. The longest time spent was going through each count, making sure we completely understood what it meant and that we answered the counts properly. I really don't think taking time is ever a bad thing. If they were corrupt, they would come back immediately IMO.
troll much?
What happen to I hit him???
@@NeuroSpiceAbeeI agree
Whatever the fallout- KR behavior in the courtroom is hard to watch. If guilty- behavior hard to watch. If not guilty - equally hard to watch. If asked to describe her demeanor on any given day, no matter what witness… No matter what basically:
Smug
Irritated that she has to be there
Enjoying her 15 minutes of fame
No thanks - I find it very hard to believe that her lawyers haven’t had a talk with her about her body language and facial expressions and lack of respect in the court room…
No idea whether she’s guilty or not, but the fact that this woman is being idolized by the turtles followers… It’s just absurd
They just want justice , it could be any one of us being falsely accused.
It makes one wonder what is the relationships with the lawyers like. Seems very close between them at times, or like they are letting her play lawyer as well. Very odd, never really saw anything like it before.
As someone who has been on a high-stakes jury before, I don't think taking time is a bad thing. Good jurors want to make sure they have looked at and understood all the evidence before making a decision on someone's life. Remember, this was a 10 week trial with something like 80 witnesses. It was hot in the courthouse. It was hard to hear and hard to see. I'm sure they want to be thorough. I remember for us, the first few hours were simply getting out all our questions and thoughts because we had to keep it to ourselves for so long. Then you sleep on it and think of new things and change your mind. Some people see things differently so we talk it through. The paperwork is also a giant BEAST. The longest time spent was going through each count, making sure we completely understood what it meant and that we answered the counts properly. I really don't think taking time is ever a bad thing. If they were corrupt, they would come back immediately IMO.
I get that if you were leaning guilty. But this whole trial and every charge involved is dependent on her hitting him with her car and causing his death. I don't see how you get beyond a reasonable doubt unless you just ignore all of the expert testimony in this case.
How do you say the car caused his death if you can't explain how the car caused his injuries?
the verdict form was very confusing and could have easily led them to believe that they have to find guilty for the lesser charge, since No guilty' option wasn't there.
Exactly the only one rushing is the "judge"
Fantastic reply…..I agreed with everything you said - also I’ve been curious, do they really think jurors don’t discuss the case with their significant other? I I know they have to instruct the jury not to speak about the case with anyone or read anything on the case but that must be next to impossible right?
@@shailaja6788couldn’t agree more….this obviously isn’t the 1st time this judge has had a case with these exact charges before. The verdict slip in her previous case(s) either had the not guilty option or not. If it did have it & she altered it specifically for this case than she should be disbarred
Not guilty not on the verdict ticket seems just a little bit of some subjective pressure.
Somebody spoke to her. From "That's the way they are" to "the forms have been changed" during that break . .
@@TheGdav0202can you send me the time stamp of when that happened cuz I can’t find it thanks 🙏
@@devenbergeron155 Court TV are uploading it right now.
Not Guilty
Guilty...
Accidental? Maybe. She was pretty lit and they had argued so I can see it happen. Doubt she meant to kill him but I still think she did it.
Thanks toThe Innocence Project, hundreds of wrongfully convicted people have been exonerated after spending YEARS in prison for crimes they didn't commit.
Cops are OFTEN corrupt, and the "Blue Wall of Silence" has been reported on in every American city for years. They protect each other, or they lose their jobs.
The truth is cops don't want their wrongdoings made public because citizens would lose faith in them, and their reputution would be trash if we knew about all the corruption. So, they've been covering bad acts up, rather than exposing them or punishing them, which only served as a "corruption incubator." Qualified Immunity means zero accountability.
The "Blue Wall of Silence" has been reported on in every American city for years. There are plentiful articles & podcasts by investigative journalists exposing it. Cops must fall in line & cover for each other, or they're sabotaged & set up to lose their jobs. It's disgusting & frightening, so most citizens prefer to deny it & pretend it's just a "few bad apples," but a primarily honest institution. However, any review of authority & positions of leadership throughout history proves that power leads to corruption - it is the human condition.
I realize your unfounded & scientifically impossible belief is likely due to your intellectual limitations & isn't your fault.
How could Karen have hit John when none of the expected evidence of such a collision exists?
Adam Lally & Co. - "She just did!"
There’s absolutely NO evidence that suggests JO’s body was struck by a vehicle. Unbiased professionals (sought after by the FBI, not the state) including a highly accredited medical examiner and two forensic crash experts completely debunked this theory. So please, tell me your reasoning behind this opinion? I’m genuinely curious.
I would almost bet Jen M and Proctor have been trolling the live feed chats since the beginning of the trial! Thumbs up if you agree
Turtle boy found Jill danil's fake account.
They can’t help themselves
This judge is soaking up the power trip.
Exactly
She had a major female *&^%$ meltdown! Totally unprofessional!
😂😂😂😂 the judge has no stakes in this. She has a set of Jury instructions that she has to follow and read to the jury, after that it’s out of her hands.
She wants it over, that is clear. She's not powertripping, she gets to decide.
1,000% GUILTY RIP John O'Keefe 🙏
I realize your unfounded & scientifically impossible belief is likely due to your intellectual limitations & isn't your fault.
How could Karen have hit John when none of the expected evidence of such a collision exists?
Adam Lally & Co. - "She just did!"
Doubt it very much
THANK GOD FOR A SMART MAN LIKE JACKSON…… JUDGE 👩⚖️ PEOPLE ARE PRAYING FOR JUSTICE
Justice for who? The perpetrator or the actual victim of her crime? The man She ran down and left gravely injured to die a horrible, cruel untimely and wholly un necessary death because she was angry and upset. Go figure. Those of you who support Karen, electing to ignore the evidence and the facts are complicit with Karen Read in the death of John O'Keefe.
There is so much reasonable doubt its ridiculous!
that is the key. BEYOND a resonable doubt
You are forgetting common sense.......but go figure!
JUDGE THE LAW IS WATCHING AND YOU ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW MADAM
So you mean to tell me that she may walk free after being drunk and leaving the scene? Yes the cops are shady but there’s no way they framed this. That would be waaay too much work. I’d love to see her smiling arrogant face if she’s found guilty of all charges!
Operating a motor vehicle under the influence of liquor.......
No motor vehicle homicide......
No negligence.....
I need to hear this again....
I’m pretty surprised to see how many ppl think she’s not guilty when she told 6 different ppl “I hit him” over and over and they have her alcohol levels at 9 drinks??? The broken light found next to him matched her SYV perfectly. Hello, she’s guilty but so have a feeling this is going to be hard for the jury!
Absolutely agree but what we have here in her supporters is a level of ignorance and lack of ability to use common sense to discern credible evidence from red herrings. They have fallen for the nonsense. For some reason it makes more sense to them than the credible evidence. Go figure. I would love to take a poll about level of education, career/job, and whether they are right brain thinkers or left brain thinkers, Any drugs use? Etc. it may be telling.
Because words aren’t facts and there’s no evidence she even said that.
Experts testified he did not get hit by a car.
@@Noneofyourbusiness57817 do 4 EMTs stating she said that multiple times isn’t evidence??? Hilarious
Sorry she didn’t say that… she asked if she could have hit him one time… very different… please rewatch trial from beginning… you have missed a lot and pay attention to at least the last 3 experts …
There’s absolutely NO evidence that suggests JO’s body was struck by a vehicle. Unbiased professionals (sought after by the FBI, not the state) including a highly accredited medical examiner and two forensic crash experts completely debunked this theory. People have said things about me that aren’t true (their word vs mine) I’ve had 9 drinks before. Does this mean I’ve killed someone? Correlation does not equal causation!
If I was falsely accused of murdering my boyfriend and being framed for the murder, the last thing I would be doing in court is smirking, laughing, eye rolling, etc.
So what ! People have different ways of expressing nervousness. Some people can be truly innocent but they express themselves in a strange unusual way.That is ridiculous to say that they are guilty because they smirked or rolled their eyes.
She cant win. Half of you people that think shes guilty complain that she always has a "b!tchy" look on her face and never smiles, and the other half of you say "i wouldnt be smirking and laughing." What exactly do you want her to do? Where a mask so you cant see what her expressions are?
@@Senoritagata-nu5te the last thing she looks is nervous
What about all the smirking the other side was doing these damn people with the comments is sickening
Luckily the judge confronted her today. She never showed any emotions for the supposed love of her life and smirked her way through the entire trial.
The only thing close to an emotion she showed was the panic over the voice mails.
AJ makes you laugh one minutes he’s unjustifably aggressive with the judge the next minute he’s slimy sucking up to her like a school boy in class. Embarrassing.
Matt look at court tvs video you say you didnt see what karen reed did when the judge said it wasnt funny you know exactly why she said that smiling and laughing as usual
She's pisssssssed because Bev is biased and unfair and I woulda LAUGHED too!!!! It's too frickin funny seeing Bev consistently stack the deck against her every chance she gets. What's it to you?
Bev laughed in Yannetti’s face literally 5 seconds prior to Karen smirking. Look at the kettle calling the pot black. It’s a damn circus at this point with all the clowns this court has seen. Why can’t Karen join in?? 🤡
This poor Canton town suffering corruption from the judge down to the police💰💤💤💤
Like small towns in upstate New York
Hopefully the jury paid better attention than this chat room
Yes!!!!!❤
Do you watch the trial? They are sworn daily to not do any independent research. Nobody important reads these blogs. It's just a gripe and hype page.
@trevorphifer2368
Hi Trevor - That doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Allow me to explain. Unless you are stating that neither those who feel Ms Read is Not Guilty paid no more attention to this case, than those who feel she is Guilty, being both are being represented in this chat. In fact, if I were to go along with your reasoning, being there seem to be a much larger group represented here, that feel Ms Read is Not Guilty, it would only stand to reason, to mean a larger portion of those watching, were not paying attention.... Whoopsy ☺️
@@purepoison618 wrong
@@purepoison618 it is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole group of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,
Of course all the kids and adults that loved to see Officer John..missing him and his nice affection..❤️
RIP Officer JO
I didn't know jurors had the right to make their own hours, lol
They got it from the judge 😮😅
What is taking so long. They did not prove that she hit him at all. Ridiculous.
Maybe there's a person stuck on wanting to know who did it if not Karen....and they don't believe a cover-up would be as easy as it actually was to pull off. The 11 rational people are spending time going over the 5,000 reasons to acquit, and that takes time. Some people are quite irrational and stubborn.
Her vehicle ERT did beyond a reasonable doubt.
Count 2 guilty. She was NOT set up
Man..I betcha Officer John O’Keefe was one the neighborhood loved to see this nice Man…every kid was so feeling bad when they didn’t see Him ❤️I’m pretty sure
One of the Albert brothers testified they had a mean name for JO because he used to yell & throw stuff at his kids for walking on his lawn. I think he was a grump. He was mean to KR.
JUSTICE FOR JOHN O’KEEFE 🙏🙏
“Is something funny, Ms. Read?”
The jury isn't buying the defense hook line and sinker.
And they ain’t buying how those injuries got on John’s body either
@@lisalopez8639 Only one dog in the neighborhood that night?
it is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole group of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,
It's totally ok if the jury doesn't "buy the conspiracy." The defense doesn't need an explanation as to _why_ Karen's Not Guilty. The Not Guilty plea alone is all they need to submit. Karen is presumed innocent until proven otherwise. So, if there was no cover-up or conspiracy, she's _still innocent_ until proven guilty.
We have factual scientific evidence proving Karen's vehicle never hit John, and that's enough to acquit her - even without a satisfactory alternate theory about who k***ed him.
How do you the jury is buying what the defense is putting down? What makes u feel that 🤔
I'm glad the judge asked her if she think's this is funny. She is on a high with her fan club outside. Sick!
How many weeks of trial and they end up with a confusing verdict form that also needs punctuation corrected??
Praying for justice for John. I do not believe Karen is guilty. Investigation into the alberts next
Towards Everyone, he had such respect and affection for Boston love ❤️
Bye Karen
Is it the Alberts P.D or the Canton P.D?
I hope the McAlbert’s haven’t got a friend on the jury or have intimidated anybody.
I feel they were in court to INTIMIDATE the jury. These cops are corrupt, they could make threats on the jury or their families. I would put nothing past them. Just look at their track record…very scary humans.
Cop left his body on front lawn? Really??
To be fair, he was drunk when he decided to do that...
So far, I'd say his plan worked out pretty friggin' well, don't you agree?
And ALL these cops can drive drunk!!! Unbelievable corruption from this corrupt judge!!!
This JUDGE HAS BEEN BIAS THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE CASE BUT GOD IS THE JUDGE OF US ALL….
He is watching
Yes God has the Final say In Jesus name Amen
Not quilty. Its not even close the whole trial was a sham. The car shows intact brake light at 5 am picture when she should have hit him hours before. What more do you need lol.
and getting put on the tow truck showed an intact brake light lol
Are you guys kidding me? Are you looking on a cell phone? It’s obviously broken.
@@reasonable342 stop lying
You guys need to watch it on TV or get different glasses. Her light was broken on the video. As a matter of fact this is not even an argument the defense made. They agreed it was already broken, but said she broke it by hitting his car. To add to that, if you watch the video the day the defense spoke about it, you can see that the lawyer quickly ask them to remove it before the car moves because it was zoomed in. And they didn't want anyone to see that there was obviously no plastic or debris on the snow.
Bev overstepped with her control issues when she directed the jury not to do a straw vote!!!
Will ALL the know officers and others who drove that night be charged with DUI? How about the Bartenders who let them all drive away? The home owners knew everyone was drunk and allowed them all to drive away. Lot of responsibility to go around here.
I dont even think Karen was drunk at all..she may have had 4 drinks if that..I have read that also..looks like John was drinking them..they didnt even test her properly..
Lally provided a ton Reasonable Doubt!
We have had to months to discuss this case with one another? The jury has had it 8 hours! They haven’t even been able to talk to one another about it! Let them talk. The outcome is obvious and I have faith they will return her NOT guilty verdict!
It takes time and this is someone’s life!
You said that right. You guys had months of the defense releasing information to a blog and to the media. You did not have all facts. You had exactly what they wanted you to see.
I was all for KR snarling at Procter when he walked by after finishing his testimony. Besides that, her smirking is really off-putting, smug, disrespectful. I'm sure KO's family are aware of it.
The lunatics who hear factual, credible, sensible, common sense evidence that the car didnt strike a person, and John's injuries werent caused by a car, from the best experts in the nation used by the DOD and hired by the DOJ...and STILL refuse to accept their testimony as true - are serving on juries and putting innocent people in prison ALL over...ALL the time.
WHY, then, is this our chosen justice system? Any of us could be imprisoned for something we didn't do because of those jackholes. There are countless accounts of this happening to people who were eventually exonerated upon further investigation. We cannot stand for this. I, for one, don't want these people on my jury if I'm ever falsely accused due to circumstantial evidence or police corruption. I don't want my freedom taken from me because of a few people's blind faith in law enforcement or critique of my facial expressions.
Why would anyone decide to put a decision this important in the hands of a jury with NO prerequisite IQ, education, life experience, or open-mindedness? Why wouldn't they have to pass a thorough screening interview, mental health assessment, psychological evaluation, or emotional intelligence screening? It's absurd. KAREN READ IS ALL OF US.
Fxck John's mom and brother - they brought John's k***ers to court with them! How disrespectful to John, how appalling! Paul O'Keefe has been glaring at Karen this entire trial with his devious and vexatious stare. How about being upset at him for that instead of the innocent woman who's spent 2+ years going up against a gang of cops and townies who made her a patsy!
KO? If you’re talking about Officer John O’Keefe’s family (and friends), they are the worst ones! They are like children sitting in those seats smirking, side eyeing, making faces, scoffing etc. Let’s not call one person out but not the others.
I love how people are shocked that there are people driving after drinking alcohol. 😂 Look around at the restaurants and bars, and look at the parking lot. Is it empty? Well those people inside that are buying alcohol are actually going getting in their car and driving. I don't drink alcohol but something for all of you to process. Next time you go out for dinner, drink water.
All of them were drinking. She wasn’t charged with DUI
VERDICT WILL BE TOMORROW
That’s what they said yesterday! 😅
Friday
He was NOT struck by the vehicle… no broken bones etc. granted she was drunk as so was he. So she is guilty of that. But she’s not responsible for his death. Maybe he was scooped up by the plow?
So you're saying a plow wouldn't break any bones? Do you know that a plow weighs 2 or 3 times more than her car? It was clearly testified by even the last defense expert that the damage done to a pedestrian depends on too many things to take account. For instance if John were hit unknowingly he would have gotten full force of the car and therefore have bruises and breaks. But if he saw it coming and began to move out of the way, his momentum would have lessened the impact. It was also very slippery and he was drunk.
@@MyLife-n8xExactly. People here are not able to absorb the fact that the exact contact/interaction is unknown. But clearly there was contact which ultimately led to the injury on the back of his head, etc.
@@reasonable342… most likely he fell backwards down the stairs when dog attacked or he was in a fight and fell backwards. Several experts testified no vehicle contact at all !! No blood on the car … but guess what the didn’t even walk in the house where he was found… I find that outrageous. Interesting.. they rejoined dog immediately and moved to a new home within days… too late to check house .. it has been what 2 years ago.. horrible investigation
Her vehicle recorded her hitting him. She was DUI. She never stopped to see if He was ok. She never once called 911.
@@AnnMcHale … you bumped your head … that did not happen
NOT GUILTY
It's so obvious. Guilty
How did he not sustain any bruising or injuries below the neck? I'll listen if you have a reasonable explanation that 2 MEs and expert biomechanical and mechanical engineers don't.
I honestly believe you, can you explain how you came to this conclusion?
Absolutely.
@@reasonable342 I believe you, mind sharing the information that led you to this conclusion?
Karen Read looks furious….. I get the feeling this woman is used to getting her own way a lot of the time. Is there a panic setting in on the defence?
Doesn't she not always look furious or 'souer'? l do not know if she has this arrogant expression on her face due to botox but to me she always looks arrogant and narcisstic... of course if she is not guilty or there is reasonable doubt she should not go jail... but still, something seems to be wrong with that woman...
@@almutstarke1344wow typical society judging someone by their looks, shame on you.
@@joditurrisi6004 No not only by her looks... don't forget her angry voicemails etc... she seems to have a problem with drinking also... l dont mean this in an arrogant way but my impression is that she is a narcisstist and lam not the only one who has that impression...
Most people lack the emotional intelligence and ability to give someone grace in times of trauma or grief. They can't allow for the possibility that people all respond differently in those times, though a response that's different than how they would've responded doesn't mean someone isn't being genuine!
It should be common knowledge that people deal with their emotions in unique ways. Some laugh or remain stoic when overwhelmed with sadness because they're in denial, or are afraid to feel the grief. Some people only cry in private. Some people have learned to dissociate from painful feelings. Some people have been through so much pain throughout their lives that they develop a tolerance to grief and no longer respond to it in a typical manner. Some people no longer express grief by crying tears after a certain period of time, because they've sufficiently cried and processed their grief. People on antidepressants may not be able to access the feeling adequately that would result in tears. For all of these reasons and more, it is insensitive, unfair, and inappropriate to judge a person's guilt based on whether or not they cry in this situation, 2 years after the loss of a loved one, while being falsely accused!
Lally blatantly lied in his closing, multiple times. I'm disgusted by him, and loathe him more than Bev, Proctor, Morrissey, or anyone else involved! He has NO conscience, and NO ethics. He's trash.
Guilty as sin.
Hello
Lesser included, forget that, there is all or nothing here. If I am the jury, I can not convict her. I have no clue if she did it or not, I know of one person that is equally likely.
Eff yeah!
I hope they take the time they need to assess all the evidence.
Someone was murdered. Another may go to prison for a long time should they be found guilty. The real killer/killers may still be out there if they get it wrong.
If I were the jurors, I'd take my sweet sweet time to take such a decision.
This judge needs to be put in her place!!
KR and team putting on a brave face.
No verdict today I bet
It’s so cringe to watch her basking in her little delusional limelight. She knows that there’s cameras on her and she’s hired a Hollywood lawyer to defend her… Every day is just a little stage for her… To roll her eyes and turn around and look at her mommy and daddy and make big eyes and roll her eyes and smile…very unlikable individual… I’m sure we’re gonna be hearing a lot from her either way in the near future
IKR! At first when I saw her and instinctively didn't like her looks and behaviors, I thought maybe I was being unfair and jealous or something. Then after I continued to watch her and hear her, I realized my initial instinct was correct. She is not a nice person.
This could go either way honestly. And seems to me they were all drinking and driving that night.
Guilty
What evidence… don’t think you watched the testimony
These defense lawyers are playing dirty pool. The judge has extreme patience with them. I'm fed up with their tricks!
Jen is that you?
Completely agree!
How many people did she con to stand outside the courthouse and pretend she’s guilty, then her paid hangers on in the comments section. Lmao
You sure fooled me! 😂🤦♂️🤦♂️
She didn't pay me. I listened to the whole trial. The fbis experts made the most sense
That you Auntie Jen? How ya doing ol snaggle tooth?!
What was your question, sir? It makes as much sense as Trooper Joe Paul's testimony.
Not to mention her parents paid a ton of money for her defense attorneys! Jackson is full of himself, likes to yell and in the end, is looking for more highly-paid defendants that he can manufacture a defense for!
Wow, there should have been a gag order on this case. That's why all this conspiracy nonsense came from, by AJ out running his big mouth.
What’s happening? Verdict?
I keep thinking this is going to be a hung jury. All the polls on every channel don't agree. 🤷🏼♀️ I just feel like if it was a firm NG, they would have come back on day 1. Someone(s) are holding out. I'm still sticking with my hung jury verdict.
The form given to the jury was confusing. May be that caused the delay. The Defense requested her to give an option to the jury to select 'Not guilty' . Initially she had declined it. But few hours later she changed it. Now it would be easier to come to a decision.
@@shailaja6788 Ya, I saw that fiasco today. It was confusing.
Maybe there's a person stuck on wanting to know who did it if not Karen....and they don't believe a cover-up would be as easy as it actually was to pull off. The 11 rational people are spending time going over the 5,000 reasons to acquit, and that takes time. Some people are quite irrational and stubborn.
Did the jurors go home for the day? Isn’t it only 4pm?
Judge has a manicure appointment
One of the jurors had to leave by a certain time ! The judge ok’d it !
Hi Debbie 👋
NOT GUILTY!
Oh the verdict is in already? WOW I can’t believe she got away with murdering a cop. That’s some serious white privilege! Just Wow!!!
It is clear that Karen was intoxicated, very angry and believed that she struck John. There's no evidence of intentional murder, but perhaps an accident. However, according to the Commonwealth's forensic expert, John's injuries were not typical of being struck by a motor vehicle. At the claimed rate of speed, he would have suffered fractures and/or severe bruises. All the forensic experts agreed that the arm injuries were consistent with animal bites and scratches. If not dog injuries during an altercation, perhaps they were caused by another animal such as a racoon that encountered his body? Trooper Proctor was viciously biased against Karen and did not conduct a real investigation. The Albert witnesses seemed evasive and dishonest about their phone activity. As it is not clear how John was killed, the Commonwealth has not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Not guilty.
They covered up something, hence the destruction of phones and the data in those phones
Also.....got rid of dog and house@@shailaja6788
I feel shade here, the whole town drinks and drives, they have a bad reputation that will last for years to come
Having worked hundreds if not thousands of traffic crashes as a Trooper and police officer this is ridiculous. First of all being impaired would eliminate any murder charge. This looks just like a set up. To prove OUI you must have a witness which does not exist. All charges should be not guilty.
Is she's found 'not gulity' tomorrow or later, it's not because she's innnocent. Just not enough proof of guilt.
In closing arguments, when the defense showed the 3 photos together of the car leaving Johns, why was the snow on the ground so red in the third photo? Could that photo have been edited to enhance the redness in the tailight?
No, that's how red tail lights look when the red plastic is in tact.
OMG, NOT GUILTY!!!!!
it is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole group of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,
She hasn't had a chance to grieve for John because she's been fighting for her own life. Those that are truly guilty will be revealed. Justice will be served. Someone's gonna talk too much, eventually. This lady is not responsible for John's death.
Prayers for you, Karen🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
AMEN!! 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
This case is so stressing .. And that Judge is a Nightmare ..
Its like she's Pissed that KR got these 2 very experienced Lawyers
Or ots shes Corrupt like everyone else in MA
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 pray for tomorrow another day
Well said…what a nightmare.
That is so true. People will slip up and start talking.
😂😂 she doesn’t grieve
The gang member bev talks to AJ as one would speak to a child.
The neighborhood was so off..after they didn’t see Nice John again ❤️
Is jury back yet?
I see sooo much more guilty's today than yesterday. What changed?
Trolls who hate the justice system and think that people should be convicted on feelings and emotions even if there isn't any evidence to back it up.
Bias
That people that thought she was guilty, decided to not entertain nonsense for so many weeks. But wanted to leave their mark today.
It’s the trolls!