Why ‘Late-Term Abortion’ Is an Inaccurate Phrase
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 сер 2024
- ‘Late-term abortion’ is not a scientific or medical term - but rather a loaded and misleading phrase used by anti-abortion advocates specifically to muddy the conversation around reproductive freedom.
The next time you hear someone use the phrase ‘late-term abortion,’ show them this video. (via uncertainlycarly on TikTok)
» Sign up for our newsletter KnowThis to get the biggest stories of the day delivered straight to your inbox: go.nowth.is/kn...
» Subscribe to NowThis Impact: go.nowth.is/Im...
For more stories like this, subscribe to @NowThisImpact.
#abortion #reproductiverights #healthcare #Politics #News #NowThis
Connect with NowThis
» Like us on Facebook: go.nowth.is/Im...
» Connect with us on Twitter: go.nowth.is/Im...
» Follow us on Instagram: go.nowth.is/Im...
» Find us on Snapchat Discover: go.nowth.is/Im...
NowThis is your premier media outlet providing you with all the content you need to stay up to date. We’re delivering all you need to know straight to your social feeds. We live where you live.
/ @nowthisimpact
@nowthisimpact
The people making the decision should be the people _in the room._ Not the people 20 counties over in a government courthouse who have to be brought up to speed with emails.
The sad fact is that some of these fetuses will never be people. It'd be awesome if they would, like this mother wanted for both of her twins. We should just stop making the decision harder for her.
I hope your message gets through. But let me just point out that if Trump is elected in November, it will be because 30 to 40,000,000 women voted for him and 10 to 15,000,000 women who live in Republican states did not vote at all. Why are women so cruel to other women? Why do women believe what you are trying to debunk in this video? is it possible that women just like to be cruel to other women?
It's because they are brainwashed as well
@@wbwarren57 It is because they are not about gaining a 'right' to kill babies and understand they aren't victims.
White women. The majority of white people, including women, have voted Republican since 1964, the year key civil rights laws passed. Why has a very simple answer: They vote their race.
Just as an example, look into critiques of how viciously racist the show The Handmaid's Tale was. And the response I got from white women about this? "Well, it's about women, so I don't even need to look at those critiques. They're irrelevant." That's literally what they said to me.
As long as "women" means "white women who have the right to white male superiority" to white women, women as a whole will suffer in the same way poor whites suffer from accepting their racist bargain. The rest of us already got our communities moving towards liberation.
I know a lot of people who actually believe those who need the procedure for medical reasons would still have access (like they did). But that's just not true
God, it’s so frustrating that we have to explain it. Thank you for being so clear and concise.
Clear as mud… it was still late term.
@agent00soul48 Just me?
@@truthache8560 so she was supposed to condemn BOTH fetuses to death because you ( and old men) see the world as either or?
@@itsknotmagic How do you figure? This is a “news” piece that presents NO objective evidence or sources. Yet you go at me?I’m the one trying to argue for keeping them alive, and not believing BS that ends with dead children. Pretty simple really.
@@truthache8560 To someone who thinks that everything that exists was created 6000 years ago by a space wizard, it would probably not be clear.
Protect women’s reproductive rights ladies let’s vote Biden2024!!
VOTE VOTE VOTE ALL 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸for your future, for your kids, for the country.💙💙💙💙💙
It’s also what one needs to picture when they hear about states who do not place time restrictions on abortions.
There is literally zero evidence on the rationality of late term abortions, asserting a rationality based on an anecdote is not a valid argument.
Nobody but the mother and doctor
And not the child
@@monarchist1838The child has no say
@@GavinCooper05 it is the life that unfortunately is regarded so little
@@monarchist1838 Not a child.
@@monarchist1838 You force children to give birth. Why?
Trump, Alito, and Thomas should be in the room, obviously!
This is a fine anecdote but doesn’t really describe the issue of late term abortions that well.
Some lady saying they never happen doesn’t make it so.
Most people understand this and do NOT have an issue with terminations of non-viable pregnancies. The problem lies when a woman can exercise her right to terminate if she chooses a full term including up to delivery a viable/healthy pregnancy.
THANK YOU !!!
Mandatory vasectomies ✌️
@benc.enlots
What a great suggestion!
Unfortunately, many SA victims do try your birth control method only to be forced into pregnancy anyway.
It doesn't seem like your method works either with or without pro-choice laws.
Abortions is what we're trying to stop here. Not passing out judgment based on assumptions.
Mandatory vasectomies is a very viable concept.....
In terms of the big picture:
1. Stops unchosen pregnancy
2. Stops mental and physical life long scars on female children from unchosen pregnancy.
3. Stops young men from being held accountable to 18 years of child support by an unchosen pregnancy.
4. Stops fathers from going to jail for failure to make support payments.
5. Removes the need for social programs.
Which, in my opinion will, over time, result in every single child being a chosen child and the return of the family unit with fathers in the home to raise their children and to give their sons a hands on role model.
Or....... you know, the government can give women's bodies back.
❤️✌️💋
@@Mr.Bo.jangles Yet you propose mandatory vasectomies based on your assumptions that it is the man's fault. Lady,... I use the term loosely and grudgingly, thy name is hypocrite.
@@Mr.Bo.jangles Despite your hyperbolic narrative, the government hasn't taken women's bodies which would be needed in order to give them back.
@benc.enlots
No. I propose mandatory vasectomies because that is the only remaining avenue. Stopping abortions isn't the responsibility of only women.
Men play a roll too.
Thank you!
CChrist-mh4mk, 6 hours ago:
*_"nowhere in the Guttmacher study does it say why those ab'ns happen."_*
From the Guttmacher (Institute) study results:
*_"Most women seeking later ab'ns fit at least one of five profiles: They were raising children alone, were depressed or using illicit substances, were in conflict with a male partner or experiencing domestic violence, had trouble deciding and then had access problems, or were young and nulliparous."_*
All this guy ever does is lie and make random stuff up.
Why did you use weeks instead of months when weeks used days from multiple months?
@@CChrist-mh4mk - there's two videos from 2022 with more views than the entire months of February or March 2024.
That's one day (twice, separately each) with more views than the entire months of February or March in 2024.
It's not just these two either. Every highest viewed video ever on this channel are all from 2022 or 2021.
You just lie all the time, as the original post shows.
@@jackaljade7 Answer the question. Why did you use weeks instead of months when you knew weeks were using days in other months?
@@CChrist-mh4mk - that makes no difference at all.
You've been proven wrong anyway.
Do you want the title of the video from 2022 with 173,000,000 views ??
That's one video, one day, with more views than the whole months of February or March in 2024.
And it's not the only one either.
@@jackaljade7 Yes it does. You lied about statistics. Why did you do that?
It should be considered an early delivery for medical reasons.
Deleted my comment they didn't agreeee with interesting form of INCLUSIVENESS
We're not going to be tolerant of bigotry and misinformation
This is just one example
@@slasherlovingay2488 Like this entire article? 🙄
Melting much?
@@slasherlovingay2488- the problem is you define a different opinion other than yours as "bigotry" and "misinformation"
If it’s that late of the term of pregnancy, how?
Maybe watch the video
Maybe find a real hobby.
They delete comments different from their opinions
How what?
@@chcknpie04I did, yet more exceptions to try and make rules with.
She's absolutely right. Only 1% are late term each year.
There's 1,000,000 each year, so that makes 10,000 late term ones each year.
That's 10,000 viable babies every year snuffed out.
She is absolutely right.
Source: CDC
@agent00soul48 - how are they not viable if cesarean is possible after viability ?? Why just make something up ??
Still having reading comprehension issues, my precious? 😘
@@jackaljade Not having a brain stem maybe? you know that missing a super important part of your brain does to you from birth, right? RIGHT?
@agent00soul48 - yes, I did. That doesn't answer the question. How are they not viable if cesarean is possible after viability ??
You said they're not viable after 22-24 weeks, so please explain how ??
And please also explain why states like CA allow abor, shons all the way up until birth by choice if it doesn't happen ??
@@Coraxincarmine - wait, you seriously think it takes 24 weeks to know if a fetus has a brain stem ?? Did you seriously just post that ??
From the National Institute of Health:
*_"the trajectory of the peer-reviewed research literature has been obvious for decades: most late-term abor, shons are elective, done on healthy women with healthy fetuses"_*
"elective" means by choice, without any medical necessity.
*_"A more recent Guttmacher study focused on abor, shon after 20 weeks of gestation and similarly concluded that women seeking late-term abor, shons were not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment."_*
Around 10,000 late term ones happen each year (source: CDC).
This means up to 10,000 viable babies are snuffed out each year.
Again, nowhere in the Guttmacher study does it say why those a bortions happen. The study is only about who is getting them.
Whoever reported this and got it taken down last time (I know who you are), *DON'T DO IT AGAIN!*
No one appointed you gatekeeper of information for people.
@@jackaljade6 LOL. You keep posting misinformation and complaining that it gets taken down.
@@jackaljade6 The Guttmacher study doesn't give the reasons why. You clearly didn't read the study and neither did the "study" you're posting. You're posting misinformation and lying.
@@CChrist-mh4mk - it literally tells you the reasons are the same as the in the first trimester. The reasons do not change.
But it doesn't even matter, it literally does not even need to tell you the reasons, because it's literally already said the reasons ARE NOT medical.
So it doesn't matter what the reasons are, because we're only interest in if it's medical or not, as is this study.
You're just making random things up as usual. It's all you do.
She went back and forth a lot in this “pro-choice” never call them “babies” there either a clump of cells or a fetuses but she out right called them a babies several times so it’s a human life and then she’s says who should be included in this discussion well that’s simple the father and the mother it’s both of there dna was passed on to those babies they both need to make a unanimous decision. There’s an episode from Superman the animated series in episodes superman once said marriage is a willing partnership where husband and wives have to share the decision and sacrifice so for what this lady said in the story the mother and father must share this decision and share the sacrifice together
Cool story, bro. Not crazy at all.
*This* is propaganda.
'" those are babies that she wanted "🤮🤮🤮🤮so she basically admitted that babies are only babies when the woman wants them .if she doesn't then it's a clump of cells
Rules and exceptions. There is a difference.
In order to adequately figure out the morality thereof we have to be honest about the act we're talking about.
You force children to give birth.
@@CChrist-mh4mk I?
@@cokedrinker941 yes, you.
@@CChrist-mh4mk What did you see me do in your clairvoyance that makes you think that?
@@cokedrinker941 you’re anti choice.