ICE Tables made EASY!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 163

  • @noapaul5440
    @noapaul5440 4 роки тому +458

    You managed to explain a week of classes in 8 minutes THANK YOU

    • @_-_-_-_-_-_-_-__-
      @_-_-_-_-_-_-_-__- 3 роки тому +17

      MY CHEM TEACHER IS USELESS I S2G

    • @its_mows
      @its_mows 3 роки тому +10

      A week. My teacher 'taught' us in 30mim

    • @ayyhmed
      @ayyhmed Рік тому +1

      7mins and 53 secs actually

  • @riak401
    @riak401 6 років тому +136

    You're so clear with how you explain things and you don't skip any small details, thank you SO MUCH! You should make more videos :)

  • @pedroreyes4947
    @pedroreyes4947 9 місяців тому +12

    I love you
    you showed me in 6 minutes what a website wasn't able to show me in 6 hours

  • @katesmini
    @katesmini 4 роки тому +61

    Thank you for explaining whre the positive and negatives go! it was so hard to find an example where the initial product and one of the initial reactants were given

  • @lisahaynes2693
    @lisahaynes2693 6 років тому +51

    THANK YOU SO MUCH for explaining where "+" & "-" go!!!

  • @ellexXxrose
    @ellexXxrose 7 років тому +174

    Only ICE table video that's actually helped me! Thank you!

  • @rkrakow1
    @rkrakow1 2 роки тому +4

    "We keep mathing it out" is my new favorite phrase. Major thank you for this!

  • @Caaliya-i9h
    @Caaliya-i9h 6 місяців тому +5

    Finally thanks to this gentleman I understand ICE Method 😊

  • @olivestuffedgarlic4901
    @olivestuffedgarlic4901 2 роки тому +9

    hey man thank you so much for this video im like 6 years late but for years i havent been able to understand ice tables. You are the best I am saved 💜

  • @KATLANA1
    @KATLANA1 3 роки тому +8

    This hurt my head to watch, but you explained it so well! Good difficult problem to really put it all into perspective

  • @jiminpark3865
    @jiminpark3865 4 роки тому +12

    the quadratic formula is -b±√(b^2 )-4ac)/2a

  • @erinyang5859
    @erinyang5859 3 роки тому +3

    thank you so much for this! i have a test tmr on ice tables and this really made things so much more clearer

  • @hindalhattawi1357
    @hindalhattawi1357 6 років тому +9

    That’s awesome thank so much. I was so confused in class, this helps tremendously.

  • @nightspy9756
    @nightspy9756 2 роки тому +4

    U EXPLAIN BETTER THAN MY CHEMISTRY TEACHER!

  • @Centimeteres
    @Centimeteres 4 роки тому +20

    How did you turn the .564 into -.436 from switching the x2 to the other side?

    • @joshuathompson1030
      @joshuathompson1030 2 роки тому +17

      1 is the coefficient of x^2 so he had subtracted 1-0.564

  • @xoxoenya
    @xoxoenya 2 роки тому +13

    how did you get the -.436^2?

    • @yourmomisaho
      @yourmomisaho Рік тому

      Subtracted 1x^2 from the right side and the left. .564-1= -.436

    • @jaziep
      @jaziep 9 місяців тому +1

      did u ever find out lol

    • @verxii187
      @verxii187 8 місяців тому +1

      he subtracted .564 by 1

  • @user-zo1dv4in8d
    @user-zo1dv4in8d 5 місяців тому +2

    Bro cooked 2 vids and dipped we need you come back. It takes so long to find someone who explains in full detail in a short amount of time.

  • @michaelchristian5381
    @michaelchristian5381 4 роки тому +12

    Hey! This is very helpful, thanks! I was wondering, if the I is all 0, which side has the negative x's?

  • @oliviawaldron4534
    @oliviawaldron4534 9 місяців тому

    this was amazing I've been so confused on the signs for x, thank you so much!!!!!!!!

  • @nicolejo6934
    @nicolejo6934 5 років тому +2

    best example anywhere!! thank you SO SO much

  • @SiaSheguri
    @SiaSheguri Рік тому

    Thank you for this video! You made my life a lot easier XD. For your first video this was really intuitive.

  • @marionettebernard6547
    @marionettebernard6547 11 місяців тому +6

    Everyone is saying this is perfectly explained but he did not explain how he got the -.08 for 4x2-.08=.0004....I see how we got 4x and the .0004 but not the middle number.

    • @funman2100
      @funman2100 2 місяці тому

      foil

    • @Kavya-vw9ll
      @Kavya-vw9ll Місяць тому

      It's an identity to expand squares of variable numbers. In this question he used a²-2ab+b²

  • @atticus141
    @atticus141 7 років тому +6

    You are my hero! Thank you so much!!!

  • @asherife
    @asherife 2 роки тому +1

    THANK YOU SO MUCH! the best video I've seen

  • @blahblah-sg4yj
    @blahblah-sg4yj 2 роки тому +2

    Isnt it crazy how complicated professors make simple things?

  • @annawilliams4669
    @annawilliams4669 2 місяці тому

    i missed a week of school and this video caught me up to speed you are a godsend

  • @trunk8526
    @trunk8526 4 роки тому +2

    so how would you find Kc if you don't have it already given to you? what is the step that I'm missing? any feedback would be appreciated.

  • @burntsweetpotato3747
    @burntsweetpotato3747 4 роки тому +2

    how did u get 1.3 * 10^-3 as the final answer? I don't understand

  • @maximilianalvarez737
    @maximilianalvarez737 4 роки тому +5

    i was so confused on one part of the step which was the 4x^2-0.08x+0.0004. it took me 10 minutes to realize where I went wrong

    • @Aaronobviously
      @Aaronobviously 2 роки тому +3

      can you explain this to me I have no idea how he did this calculation

    • @nayachryzler4049
      @nayachryzler4049 5 місяців тому

      How did it happen?

    • @rasaun56
      @rasaun56 Місяць тому

      @@nayachryzler4049 foil

    • @8ahamburger
      @8ahamburger 14 днів тому

      Did u understand it ? Pls help ​@@Aaronobviously

  • @shelleykim38
    @shelleykim38 5 років тому +6

    So helpful, I can be confident in getting an A now on my upcoming exam :) thank you!!

    • @SatnamSingh-el2rp
      @SatnamSingh-el2rp 5 років тому +13

      chem is so fucking hard, i wanna kill myself everyday

    • @bobthebb-illder827
      @bobthebb-illder827 4 роки тому

      Satnam Singh yeah fuck school

    • @RandomPerson-hd9sb
      @RandomPerson-hd9sb 3 роки тому +1

      how'd it go?

    • @shelleykim38
      @shelleykim38 3 роки тому +2

      @@RandomPerson-hd9sb oh, I'm pretty sure I did well, big help with this video probably! It's been so long now ahh. I'm now studying for MCAT lol

    • @birsandhu201
      @birsandhu201 2 роки тому +2

      @@shelleykim38 how’d the MCAT go?

  • @louisiannesaldagna5807
    @louisiannesaldagna5807 3 роки тому

    The world is good because of people like you

  • @Tori-pn9np
    @Tori-pn9np Рік тому

    You're literally the best human in existence

  • @justicekilfillen
    @justicekilfillen 3 роки тому +1

    My professor made ICE tables sound like rocket science, this makes me feel incompetent but thankyou so much

  • @Chulaxcabra
    @Chulaxcabra Місяць тому

    The ONLY thing I wished you showed, was step by step the quadratic formula part, but oh well. I get the gist. Thank you!

  • @peterlohnes1
    @peterlohnes1 Місяць тому

    Explaining where the positive X goes and the negative X depends entirely what you start with. A lot of Equilibrium questions start with ONLY reactants and NO products, which means the concentrations of the REACTANTS can ONLY go down (thus -x), and the products can ONLY go up. KEEP IN MIND THO that the x values might be multiplied by the coefficients. So 2 moles of reactant mean you have to subtract (-2x) in the CHANGE portion of the RICE table.
    OTHER equilibrium questions have partial quantities of Reactants and products IN THIS CASE because one product is at ZERO, the products MUST GO UP (thus +x or +2x or +3x). HOWEVER in other questions equilibrium is established, and you must figure out what happens to the equilibrium happens when either more product or reactant is added. This might require calculating a TRIAL K value. Trial K values that are SMALLER than the actual Keq value provided MUST shift towards the products(thus +x goes on the product side of the CHANGE line and -x goes on the reactant side. Trial K values that are BIGGER than Keq means the shift goes towards the REACTANT SIDE (which would use +x in the CHANGE LINE and -x for the products on the CHANGE LINE).
    Understanding this is important.

  • @tammy8195
    @tammy8195 3 роки тому +4

    what if the 0s are on the reactants side? would that side then be the +x side?

  • @techBRO1024
    @techBRO1024 2 роки тому

    Thanks dude! I really appreciate this.

  • @OneTruVoo
    @OneTruVoo Рік тому +1

    How did you get .08x for the denominator ? im so confused on how to do these types of problems & you didn’t go into enough detail on how to actually solve the problem you rather implemented the answers you got onto this paper without fully explaining how to get the values being written down

  • @futurepharm1776
    @futurepharm1776 4 роки тому +3

    I’m not even kidding, your handwriting looks exactly the same as mine!

  • @malakalzergani2211
    @malakalzergani2211 Рік тому

    bro i swear this helped so much I WAS STUCK ON A WUSSTION LIKE GHIS FOR A WHILE

  • @cyborg2.099
    @cyborg2.099 3 роки тому +2

    Where did the .08x come from ?

  • @imanscott8094
    @imanscott8094 7 років тому +8

    how did it go from .564 to -.436?

    • @andreasens123
      @andreasens123 7 років тому +1

      He subtracted the x^2 on both sides. (0.564x^2)-1x^2= (-0.436x^2)

    • @kris_8187
      @kris_8187 6 років тому

      Yeah.. shouldn't it be -1.564?

    • @stefanramanayake7269
      @stefanramanayake7269 6 років тому +2

      nah nah he did 0.564x^2 - 1x^2. The x^2 gets cancelled and the answer is -0.436

    • @jovass3262
      @jovass3262 4 роки тому

      Stefan Ramanayake why do I get -0.681 ?

    • @sayso2536
      @sayso2536 2 роки тому +1

      1-0.564 should give you .436

  • @akimminavarro278
    @akimminavarro278 7 років тому +1

    This deserves more views

  • @blainefoster12
    @blainefoster12 4 роки тому +1

    Mate, how do you have the initial concentration of products as .03 M?
    Initially no products exist

  • @jacobholladay5824
    @jacobholladay5824 3 роки тому

    You are the clutchest man ever

  • @cristinalin544
    @cristinalin544 4 роки тому +1

    BLESS YOU BRO

  • @fursuredog
    @fursuredog 3 роки тому

    Thank you, young wise Professor

  • @ninacarranza5189
    @ninacarranza5189 7 років тому +2

    Thank you for this video. Very well explained.

  • @Beauuty97
    @Beauuty97 5 років тому +1

    Wow THANK YOU. This is the best video yet on Ice tables you are awesome!!

  • @Relius36
    @Relius36 6 років тому +1

    So you didn’t have to enter this into the quadratic formula?

  • @abrahammartinez-b3k
    @abrahammartinez-b3k Рік тому

    Thank you Justin

  • @carlyhall8133
    @carlyhall8133 5 років тому +3

    Hi! I love this video , but I’m confused where you
    Got the .141 from.

  • @hugoquan3840
    @hugoquan3840 2 роки тому +1

    Ty so much for this video!!!

  • @liaselleaeri
    @liaselleaeri 7 місяців тому +1

    what if Kc wasn't given?

  • @emelyruiz793
    @emelyruiz793 6 років тому

    YOU ARE AN ANGEL!! THANK YOU SO MUCH!!

  • @pakeezasaleem8227
    @pakeezasaleem8227 6 років тому +1

    how can we find initial concentrations with the help of kc and equilibrium concentrations?

  • @mohamed-amenyussuf1185
    @mohamed-amenyussuf1185 23 дні тому +1

    Wish I found this in first year lol.

  • @kaylastory9859
    @kaylastory9859 4 роки тому

    Incredibly helpful!

  • @sianleerasonabe5902
    @sianleerasonabe5902 8 місяців тому +2

    How did u get .0004??

    • @disabled_tuna
      @disabled_tuna 3 місяці тому

      its from the squared value of (0.02 - 2x), its was squared because there were 2 mols of BrCl in the given chemical equation

  • @StrifePulse
    @StrifePulse 2 роки тому

    Bruh this helped so much, ty!

  • @galenli6402
    @galenli6402 2 роки тому

    holy crap this is finally answered my burning question of "why tf is it the change negative?!?!?!?!"

  • @zadiey458
    @zadiey458 3 роки тому

    My teacher literally just said an ICE table would help to solve this but NEVER taught us how to do them

  • @joule-trix
    @joule-trix 4 роки тому +1

    I thought the products were on the right side of the rxn and reactants on the left ? Does it matter? Thankyoi and great video helped me a ton

    • @NamrataPrasad1
      @NamrataPrasad1 4 роки тому +1

      The reactant are always on the left side, while the products remain on the right side on the chemical reaction. So pretend that you’re reading a book, you go from right to the left to get your product.

    • @julia-ex7im
      @julia-ex7im 4 роки тому

      @@NamrataPrasad1 was his final answer (1.3x10^-3) the value of x?

  • @Obaid-Ur-Rahman342
    @Obaid-Ur-Rahman342 6 місяців тому

    Thank you this video was really helpful.

  • @ivyleehung3569
    @ivyleehung3569 4 роки тому

    Thank you for this!

  • @gameplayEditor-cv6rt
    @gameplayEditor-cv6rt Рік тому

    thank you so much who was know that you will help me after7 years

  • @gloozle1347
    @gloozle1347 7 років тому +1

    Thank you so much!

  • @sultan2012ful
    @sultan2012ful 6 років тому

    You are amazing ! Thank you

  • @danielalbassit8051
    @danielalbassit8051 Рік тому

    Quick question during the last part the quadratic, you get 2 answers why did you pick that answer and not the other?? 😁

  • @21008505ify
    @21008505ify 5 місяців тому

    why didnt you show us how you put into quad. equation?????

  • @seangibney2495
    @seangibney2495 7 років тому

    Dont you have to fill this back into the table nd then into the kc formula to get your answer?????????

  • @ragheebaashfaq565
    @ragheebaashfaq565 4 роки тому

    WOW. thank you so so much!!!

  • @cd6581
    @cd6581 7 років тому

    You explained it so well

  • @dominoot2652
    @dominoot2652 8 місяців тому

    my goat thank you!

  • @nfg974
    @nfg974 2 роки тому

    Thanks man!

  • @annablackford7113
    @annablackford7113 4 роки тому

    Thank you!!! So helpful!!

  • @cardiacmyxoma4073
    @cardiacmyxoma4073 3 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @ايامزمان-ع9ز
    @ايامزمان-ع9ز Рік тому +2

    wh if i dont know math, i litreally didnt get it cuz its not explained from where u got the numbers at the end

    • @Anomoly_
      @Anomoly_ Рік тому

      He said he got it by the calculator bruv

  • @emmaamsbury4065
    @emmaamsbury4065 7 років тому

    This helped so much! thanks!

  • @elaraax
    @elaraax 8 місяців тому

    THANK YOUU!!!

  • @Dremforte
    @Dremforte 2 роки тому +1

    wow, this is not complicated atall... thanks (From the future)

  • @FinancingEnhancing
    @FinancingEnhancing 6 місяців тому +1

    w

  • @paulnguyen9857
    @paulnguyen9857 5 років тому

    What about when there is no zero? How would you know which X’s are negative or positive? I know it has something to do with the shift of the reaction but still confused

    • @luismiranda1929
      @luismiranda1929 5 років тому +6

      the reactants are negative because they are being consumed, and the products are positive because they are being produced.

    • @codygruberg7294
      @codygruberg7294 4 роки тому

      @@luismiranda1929 but in his example the positive values come from dissociating ions

  • @AmyGraybear
    @AmyGraybear Місяць тому

    can you not show how to solve the quadratic too???

  • @shermat455
    @shermat455 10 місяців тому

    great video

  • @MariaFernanda-oz6uf
    @MariaFernanda-oz6uf 2 роки тому

    Thank you! I got it :)

  • @ZoemaIndustries
    @ZoemaIndustries 2 роки тому

    The forbidden knowledge!

  • @user-oe1nt4pp8n
    @user-oe1nt4pp8n 6 років тому

    thanks, great tutorial

  • @adrianflores3919
    @adrianflores3919 4 роки тому

    Really helped, thanks g

  • @mkb3195
    @mkb3195 3 роки тому

    THANK YOU

  • @ObeyAmmalol
    @ObeyAmmalol 6 років тому

    Great video omg!!!

  • @nickypaci920
    @nickypaci920 7 років тому

    do u not do x/2 for the c of br2 and cl2?

  • @갱갱항상
    @갱갱항상 3 роки тому

    i understand it all, but all that bothers me is when do we know which x value to choose?

    • @daphnelove4991
      @daphnelove4991 3 роки тому

      It’ll tell you in the question which one you’re trying to find

  • @pseudonymphmusic7721
    @pseudonymphmusic7721 8 місяців тому

    Not to be weird-but you sound like you’re handsome.
    Thanks for the help!

  • @alitajoo9233
    @alitajoo9233 3 роки тому

    hey dude, thanks a lot. it helped :))

  • @sameeralikhan5133
    @sameeralikhan5133 5 років тому

    Thank you thank you very much sir

  • @karnadityasinhvala3019
    @karnadityasinhvala3019 3 роки тому

    Thanks it help in clear NEET exam

  • @MrRushbrown
    @MrRushbrown 8 років тому

    thank you

  • @anyemkkkk
    @anyemkkkk 7 років тому

    THANKS!!!!

  • @orangeinfotainment620
    @orangeinfotainment620 11 місяців тому

    thanks