Equilibrium Made Easy: How to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 тра 2019
  • What is dynamic equilibrium? How can you easily solve equilibrium problems in chemistry? Learn this and more...
    For a limited time, get $200 cash if you qualify! Check out:
    www.referyourchasecard.com/18...
    #chemistry #equilibrium #madeeasy #ketzbook #tutorial

КОМЕНТАРІ • 78

  • @Exemplary832
    @Exemplary832 Рік тому +14

    Nonsense

  • @lyra331
    @lyra331 2 роки тому +65

    hi! I am dyscauculic with ADHD and I've been for like, 3 years without understanding chemistry trying my hardest, usually I don't watch youtube classes cause they don't make any difference, I normally don't understand, but WOW for the first time i got something, like, in my life. I even cried a little. thank you so much, you're a hero professor!

  • @khushisoam8068
    @khushisoam8068 3 роки тому +36

    I never knew that I could learn the topic of 5 hrs in 12 mins ! TYSM

  • @obama8573
    @obama8573 3 роки тому +21

    The one who made this video is a legend 💯

  • @rationalism_communism
    @rationalism_communism 4 місяці тому +2

    I was very confused but after watching lots of videos and the same scenarios come up, I leaned quadratic equations and now I get it. It took a week.

  • @brianottenbreit871
    @brianottenbreit871 3 роки тому +9

    I see below that someone pointed out that deriving the rate of the forward and backward reactions cannot be done by looking at the coefficients., but rather must be experimentally determined. The equilibrium constant can, however, be found by the coefficients. Kr and Keq are fundamentally different as can be seen if you do the work to find the units.

  • @damtewbogale6794
    @damtewbogale6794 2 місяці тому

    The most comprehensive video about chemical equilibrium on YT

  • @jeremiakasinda7695
    @jeremiakasinda7695 5 років тому +12

    Thank you allot, this will really help tomorrow in my Chemistry 1A exam.

  • @luke5385
    @luke5385 6 місяців тому

    this is so high quality and well explained. ty!

  • @home-sauce
    @home-sauce 5 років тому +8

    this is pretty important for the AP chem test

  • @katherinelee2690
    @katherinelee2690 3 роки тому +4

    literally thank u so much, this was so helpful

  • @Nicole-tb6iw
    @Nicole-tb6iw 3 роки тому +6

    thank you so much, it's brief and easily understood

  • @bettan369
    @bettan369 3 роки тому +1

    amazing explanation. thank you!

  • @saikumar.d7101
    @saikumar.d7101 4 роки тому +3

    Thank u sir ur video is too good
    Please make up like this cideos

  • @albertlonga6995
    @albertlonga6995 Рік тому +1

    I am enjoying , bcoz of what you are explaining it is easy to understand , thank you!

  • @taurus7261
    @taurus7261 2 роки тому +7

    I have a question regarding the last problem. Why is that the reactant gained the +2x as its change in molarity when the whole reaction is product favored based on the value of Kc?

  • @chandrashekarhb9349
    @chandrashekarhb9349 4 роки тому +6

    Excellent and nicely explained. You are a good teacher.

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  4 роки тому +3

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @respectanyone117
    @respectanyone117 Рік тому

    After struggling so much I finally found this video

  • @atanursaparbaev9691
    @atanursaparbaev9691 2 роки тому

    Thanks very much!!!!

  • @kishamuringani9331
    @kishamuringani9331 3 роки тому +1

    can you please make a video mainly on examples of questions on equillibrium

  • @lillymaewilcox31
    @lillymaewilcox31 3 місяці тому

    Thank you so much, you're a life saver

  • @Anime_world_india78
    @Anime_world_india78 3 роки тому +5

    Can you please make a video about physics
    Topic: simple harmonic oscillation (S.H.O)

  • @anwarvictor9448
    @anwarvictor9448 2 роки тому

    great!!!!

  • @anni2165
    @anni2165 4 роки тому +2

    Good & helpful explain👍
    This video help me a lot to understand this subtopic more
    Thank you

  • @BoonkiCoC14
    @BoonkiCoC14 3 роки тому

    Jeez, did i just understand this? Yes i did, sir. Thanks a lot, my book has spent around 20 pages talking about this but it makes no fucking sense. Thank you!!!!

  • @nt-qb5pb
    @nt-qb5pb 4 роки тому +2

    we want more and more videos

  • @schneiderwanjia3433
    @schneiderwanjia3433 Рік тому

    Thanks

  • @user-uk7zv1ks8x
    @user-uk7zv1ks8x 6 місяців тому

    Hi!I am chiamaka pls how did u get the value of x as 0.2
    I means what was the quadratic equation you used to have the value of x.Thanks

  • @makaylahawkins9702
    @makaylahawkins9702 2 роки тому

    How do you get those initial molarities

  • @rajatdas5500
    @rajatdas5500 3 роки тому

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @chandrasai1990
    @chandrasai1990 3 роки тому

    thanks from India class 11 preparation for jee mains

  • @rassimsimou1594
    @rassimsimou1594 4 місяці тому +1

    Good

  • @taranjotkaur4831
    @taranjotkaur4831 5 років тому +4

    plz make a video on organic chemistry

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  5 років тому

      what specifically? OChem is a very big topic.

    • @taranjotkaur4831
      @taranjotkaur4831 5 років тому +3

      @@ketzbook
      electrophillic nd nucleophillic subsitution reactions

  • @user-ce9ko6eg3w
    @user-ce9ko6eg3w 7 місяців тому

    Why dividing the conc of NO2 BY N2O4 instead of other way round since NO2 a product not a reactant in example 2???

  • @meebee5189
    @meebee5189 3 роки тому +1

    Sorry Im a little confused at 3:10 how did u derive the rate equation for the Haber process from the stoichiometric ratios? I see how you are trying to derive K from the rate constants but... the order of a reaction is not equivalent to the coefficients from the equation.

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  3 роки тому +1

      most often the rate law can be taken from the coefficients of the balanced equation, although you are correct that there are many exceptions to that, and you need to do kinetic studies to determine it. However, I did not intend to go through exceptions in a video that focuses on the basics. Equilibrium is intricately tied to kinetics. One may incorrectly think, for example, that the equilibrium expression of an Sn1 reaction is different from that of an Sn2 reaction; however, both reactions include the activity of the nucleophile in the equilibrium expression because the true full rate law of an Sn1 reaction actually includes the nucleophile and the leaving group. That is just one exception.

  • @jishakjishak4698
    @jishakjishak4698 3 роки тому

    Thanks for such a fine class

  • @Sanara_Singh
    @Sanara_Singh 3 місяці тому

    The equilibrium concentration of CCl4 must be 0.024 moles.

  • @user-ze3bc9yb9y
    @user-ze3bc9yb9y 4 роки тому +2

    Can you please make a video on hydrogen and proton nmr spectrum

  • @janetnkrumah542
    @janetnkrumah542 2 роки тому

    Thanks a lot sir

  • @BeatriceAntwi-kj8ry
    @BeatriceAntwi-kj8ry 9 місяців тому +1

    For the last question, why wasn't the moles(0.95) changed into molar concentration by dividing by 10L?

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  9 місяців тому

      it is a 1.0 L container, not 10 L. If it were 10 L, we should divide by 10.

  • @rosemin1973
    @rosemin1973 2 роки тому +1

    hey..with the last question i don't get why we had -x and not +x

  • @andreazuliani7004
    @andreazuliani7004 2 роки тому +1

    I am finding this way more complicate than how explained in my class.. I don't understand all the x and those extra calculations here

  • @moengpasela773
    @moengpasela773 3 роки тому +1

    how did u calculate initial molarity and equilibrium molarity

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/KLjWa9cE2uk/v-deo.html

  • @hunnidasiago746
    @hunnidasiago746 2 роки тому +1

    Surprisingly...my lecturer watches your videos...uses ur concepts...and your questions too😂...I'm getting my fees back

  • @pynthymmailangdkhar1403
    @pynthymmailangdkhar1403 3 роки тому

    Is this for class 12?

  • @joy_boy37
    @joy_boy37 2 роки тому

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @joy_boy37
    @joy_boy37 2 роки тому

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌

  • @cathystacy9810
    @cathystacy9810 3 роки тому +1

    Cleveland clinic

  • @chamasayasianjina2081
    @chamasayasianjina2081 3 роки тому

    Where is the 0.024 coming from??

  • @geralddemafilez4926
    @geralddemafilez4926 6 місяців тому

    i think you forgot to square the molarity of NO2

  • @feifeiiii
    @feifeiiii 2 роки тому

    9:18

  • @nnk2874
    @nnk2874 2 роки тому

    I feel like you confused the molarity of CCl4 to be .176 when in fact in appears to be the value we used to plug into X. CCl4 should be .024 molarity. Therefore, in the fraction where you have Kc = (2(.024))^2 / .176 ---> .176 should instead be .024.

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  2 роки тому

      nope, 0.176 comes right from the data in the question. It is correct.

  • @pinkflower88
    @pinkflower88 3 місяці тому

    7:45 can somebody explain what he just did here, why 0.88÷5, please explain

    • @rishmakumar3644
      @rishmakumar3644 2 місяці тому +1

      He did this to get it into the concentration, i.e. [concentration (M or mol/L) = moles (mol)/volume (L)], since Kc is measured using the concentrations of each reactant and product. If he did not divide 0.88mol/5L to get 0.176mol/L then he would've only had the moles.
      He also converted the moles of CCl4 to concentration in the beginning too.
      Sorry if my explanation is a bit all over the place. Hope this helps

  • @aurangzaibkhan543
    @aurangzaibkhan543 3 роки тому

    You are great but 2.8+4.4=6.12and you say that it is 2+2+1.6=5.6

  • @RebelRelatives
    @RebelRelatives 10 місяців тому

    Gimme the I30N thee 8 GTI/R Killer
    But how can u start 5:04 😂😂😂😂 and im with you 600K for a Hatchback 5:54 yooo😂😂😂😂 i rather get an old RS3 or old A45 with +/- 150k km

  • @user-wx2dg7cg6s
    @user-wx2dg7cg6s 4 місяці тому

    Pls I understand nothing

  • @thepelicanman7436
    @thepelicanman7436 Рік тому

    I f*cking hate physics sometimes

  • @vickysilver8509
    @vickysilver8509 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks

  • @janetnkrumah542
    @janetnkrumah542 2 роки тому

    Thanks a lot sir