Full Video: reelCqyTcg... Don't forget to help us create more videos! We need your support: / inspiringphilosophy / @inspiringphilosophy inspiringphilosophy.locals.com/
It’s usually a mistake to be so certain when psychoanalyzing dead people. IP may be correct here. But, there could be better solutions to this questions we don’t about because of lost cultural contexts-which are myriad.
@Ben O Brien Those who don't know it........REPEAT it. The devil has NO new tricks, just the same old same old, with a different "face" accompanying them.
Exactly brother Michael Jones out here exposing false teachers. AMEN fellow brothers and sisters in Christ our Lord and God bless you ALL 🙏 ❤️ 👊. I'm glad more people are learning to understand The Bible, Christianity and theism in it's context through Apologetics like Inspiring Philosophy 💯. I hate this New Age Theology BS 🤔😕😑. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college student. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't. I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict. Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers. Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word. Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant.
I really hope Robert finds The Truth that he claims to uphold but rejects simultaneously through false teachings and lies. Exactly brother Michael Jones out here exposing false teachers. AMEN fellow brothers and sisters in Christ our Lord and God bless you ALL 🙏 ❤️ 👊. I'm glad more people are learning to understand The Bible, Christianity and theism in it's context through Apologetics like Inspiring Philosophy 💯. I hate this New Age Theology BS 🤔😕😑. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college student. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't. I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict. Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers. Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word. Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant.
@@justingary5322 “evolution requires life to already exist”. Couldn’t have said it better. Their entire ideology is based off the ignorance of the fact that NOTHING comes from nothing. It’s the complete rejection of truth and reason
There are a whole ton of people spreading misinterpretations of Paul's writings, still twisting them around to reflect their own desires, rather than leaving his teaching clear. Sad.
Paul also tells how he spent time with Peter (and James maybe?), and compared what he has been preaching with the Gospel they taught and that it was the same. We should pray for this guy that he finds The Truth and repents.
Before the bible was completed, the truths of the Scriptures, as we know it now, was revealed over time. Peter and the other 11 didnt even know the mystery that Jesus would reveal to Paul more than a year after the resurrection. Peter's sermon in acts 2 was about the Jews killing the Messiah and they had to repent of it and be baptized for the remission of sins. Just on the face of it we can see that he wasnt preaching the wonder that happenend at the cross to those people in Acts 2. He wasnt telling them that their sins were forgiven because Jesus died in their place to satisy the wrath of God and they just needed to believe to be saved. Even though I firmly believe that the 12 and Paul were 100% on the same page at the end, there was most definitely a transitioning period, most cleary observed in the book of Acts. Paul's message was 100% complimentary to the 12's, yet there were deeper truths to be revealed. That first period after pentacost, Peter and the 11 were instructed to only go to the lost sheep of Isreal. And I believe their ministry was to God fearing Jews, especially those who rejected Jesus yet followed the torah. They believed in God, but not yet believed that Jesus was the Messiah. It's really cool to study up on what the Messiah means to the jews. What their expectations were, etc. Paul had the ministry of speaking to unbelievers, gentile pagans who had no faith in the God of the bible. He didnt come with the accusation of them murdering Christ. He could just tell them who Christ is and what He did for the whole world, and they could come in faith and be saved. It took a while for Peter to understand all of Pauls teachings and he even warns others that it is difficult and should be studied carefully and not be misrepresented, as for instance the extreme free grace believers would do
funny how Peter and james never mentioned Paul. it's easy to make claims that famous people agree with you, not so easy to show evidence this is the case.
@@velkyn1 galatians 1:18-19 Paul mentions seeing both of them. Peter mentions Paul in his writtings and they were all together in acts 15. So they most certainly met.
@@AnniEast There is no evidence they met, nor that the events in acts or in any of paul's letters happened. They may have met, but Acts doesn't seem to indicate that since it presents Peter very strangely. Peter's speech in Acts 15 is most curious since he was supposedly with jesus and jesus said that the law is to be followed, Matthew 5 and Matthew 19, as examples. Why would he have such a change of mind here?
@@velkyn1 no evidence they met? What more do you want than what is clearly written? If you want more than that then we can say there is hardly any evidence for anything that happened 2000 years ago. We werent there. We must trust that the Word of God is reliable. You problem is right division. It is the problem most people have when they are faced with the apparent contradictions between Paul and James. They cant reconcile it, so they drop one...usually Paul bc they figure since the others knew Christ in the flesh they are superior. But you just need to recognize you place in the story. Hint, you are part of the Body of Christ
@@efootballmania The prisoners that Paul had travel with him that saw the light of Jesus as well. There was also Ananias who baptized and Paul received the Holy Spirit of God.
@@KingNazaru Acts 9:7 [7]The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone. Does this men have a name? Ananias an eyewitness to Paul being appointed as a disciple/servant/apostle of Jesus Christ ? The reference?
@@efootballmania 1. It’s “Do these men have names?” not “Does this men have a name.” (Acts 9.15-16, 19; 22.12-16). Describe Jesus commissioning Paul to go to Damascus to receive further instruction, as well as Ananias baptizing Paul and his sight returning after receiving the Holy Spirit.
Paul explicitly says there is not another Gospel anyway... "I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel- *not that there is another one,* but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ." Galatians 1: 6-7
@_notim_ . Hi.Pauls gospel has the following criteria, Galatians 1:11 For I would have you know, brethren,that the gospel which was preached by me is not man's(b) gospel. (b) footnote.Greek according to man.
Galatians 1:12 For I did not receive it from man,nor was I taught it,but it came through a revelation of Jesus Christ. Galatians 1:20(In what I am writing to you,before God, I do not lie!) Rsv
If Daniel were to say "heed *my* prophecy" to the king of Babylon, does that mean his prophecy is in dialectical tension with the biblical prophecies that come before, or after? Of course not. It's the same with Paul's use of "my gospel." I'm pretty sure a five year old could figure this out.
@@tifeolasupo Paul has a completely different theology than the gospels. Even the gospels don’t agree with eachother in theology. People like Michael want to presuppose that all these different books are one book with one author with one theology. That’s how he arrives at his fallacy claim and arguments.
@@alonzoharris9049 you clearly do not understand the gospels in their contexts. You also do not understand Paul's words (hint: Peter said they are hard to understand though). If you want to learn, we could teach you. Meanwhile, Michael does not presuppose that the books are one with one author. They are four different books written about one person from four different viewpoints (hence differences in details).
@@aericabison23 his reasoning is that when Jesus says “Lazarus, come out,” it’s a declaration of Lazarus revealing his sexuality and not what it actually is. 🤦♀️
@@alonzoharris9049 Nothing biblical about this statement.. at all… 😅 One necessary Being spoke the universe into existence.. we know it as one universe.. yet it is three dimensional space: X axis, Y axis, Z axis; His fingerprint. One Being, three persons. The Son having two natures, NOT two persons. Proverbs 30:2-4 an Arabian gentile, named Agur who comes to the knowledge of the triune GOD: “Surely I am more stupid than any man, And I do not have the understanding of a man. Neither have I learned wisdom, Nor do I have the knowledge of the Holy One. Who has ascended into heaven and descended? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has wrapped the waters in His garment? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His name or His son’s name? Surely you know!” John 3:13 “No one has ascended into heaven, but He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man.” John 17:6-8 ““I have manifested Your name to the men whom You gave Me out of the world; they were Yours and You gave them to Me, and they have kept Your word. Now they have come to know that everything You have given Me is from You; for the words which You gave Me I have given to them; and they received them and truly understood that I came forth from You, and they believed that You sent Me.”
Not to mention that Paul basically says "I'll be damned if I should ever come up with a different Gospel!" (But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! Galatians 1:8 NIV)
Ah that must be the dude Jude was saying heaps abuse on celestial beings. And the angels in Acts 1 and Revelation do preach a different gospel than Paul.
@@PhantommJ but Paul teaches a different gospel than Jesus of Nazareth. "The Son of Man will send his angels and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth." Matthew 13:41-42 Jesus says in Matthew 24 many false Christs will be taught. Paul is the worst of the bunch. At least Mohammad doesn't blame Jesus for his Lawlessness. They're both evil, but Paul is worse. So its crazy to hyperfocus on Islam or Mormons when Paul is the Man of Lawlessness and he himself preaches the Anti-Christ. It is Paul that Daniel prophesied of as Abomination of Desolation.
@@PhantommJ you can't stop at verse 16. Without verse 17 someone might not realize Peter is WARNING his audience. "Therefore, dear friends, since you have been *forewarned,* be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the *error of the lawless* and fall from your secure position." 2 Peter 3:17 Peter may call Paul "brother" when he warns against Lawlessness but Paul calls Peter, James and Barnabas "hypocrites" in Galatians 2 while promoting Lawlessness. If you accept Paul then you have to believe Peter, James and Barnabas are hypocrites.
They didn't, this guys taking the bible out of context. The apostles never said Paul was preaching a different gospel to what they were. Its a weak argument that has no basis.
There is an excellent chapter in the Historical Reliability of the New Testmament addressing whether Paul is the Founder of Christianity. Definately worth the read. The theology in both Paul's letters and the Gospels complement one another.
@Alonzo Harris He heard the Gospel from those he knew in the early Church such as Peter, and from the Holy Spirit indwelling him. He likely also heard some earlier writings such as Mark.
@@alonzoharris9049 . . . I've never met Robert Oppenhiemer. Can not my views and understandings of physical chemistry be complementary? I've never met William Wilberforce nor John Newton. Are our views that buying and selling men as beasts and cattle uncomplementary? This is a poor jump in logic. Paul clearly heard the gospel of Jesus, and this reflects in his writings.
@@alonzoharris9049 Example 1. Cites 1 Corinthians 11:23-25 pg 416. “All three Synoptic Gospels contain similar words attributed to Jesus on the last night of his earthly life (Mark 14:22-24; Matt 26:26-28; Luke 22:19-20).” -416 “We have seen earlier that Luke almost certainly wrote after Mark, using and editing him, and that a date in the early 60s is the earliest realistic date for the composition of the Gospel of Luke. That means that when Paul was writing 1 Corinthians, dated by virtually all scholars of any theological persuasion to the mid-50s, he could not have been copying Luke’s Gospel. It had to have been the oral tradition that was circulating on which he relied.” -417 “What is more, Paul does not appeal to human tradition here as he does sometimes elsewhere (e.g., 1 Cor 15:3). This information has come specifically “from the Lord” (11:23).” -417 “Both Jesus and Paul, therefore, believed that Christ’s death provided a substitutionary atonement for the sins of humanity (his death huper humōn- “on your behalf” or “for your sake” -1 Cor 11:24; Luke 22:29; cf. Rom 3:25; Mark 10:45), a central tenet of Christianity throughout its history.12” -417
Another great example: ***”He was born as a human (Rom. 9.5) to a woman and under the law, that is, as a Jew (Gal. 4.4), that he was descended from David’s line (Rom. 1.3; 15.12); though he was not like Adam (Rom 5.15), that he had brothers, including one named James (1 Cor. 9.15; Gal. 1.19), that he had a meal on the night he was betrayed (1 Cor. 11.23-25), that he was crucified and died on a cross (Phil. 2.8; 1 Cor. 1.23; 8.11; 15.3; Rom. 4:25; 5.6, 8; 1 Thess 2.15; 4.14, etc.), was buried (1 Cor. 15.40), and was raised three days later (1 Cor. 15.4; Rom. 4.25; 8.34; 1 Thess. 4.14, etc.), and that afterwards he was seen by Peter, the disciples and others (1 Cor. 15.5-7).46” -432
This guy Preaches a Different Gospel and Different Jesus because it needs to fit His Narrative. Without their Lies their Narrative Dies! Thank you brother, God bless you and your ministry!
I think if you look at the different conversion stories of Peter and Paul you can see why they approach the Gospel from different viewpoints. Paul's conversion was like lightning, a very rapid change from a horrible person to a saved man preaching the Gospel. Peter knew Christ personally, and his conversion was more of a process with many stumbles along the way. They are teaching the same Gospel, but from different personal experiences.
Paul was not really a horrible person by traditional jewish standards, he did what any good jew would do and reject anything that opposed what they(jews) thought to be correct at the time. According to the law those who worshipped other gods had to be stoned. Paul didnt yet understand that Jesus was God. Paul actually had a lot of zeal for God. He thought he was doing God a service. He was operating in accordance with the law and what he was taught. He was not yet regenerated, but still a believer in God of the bible. His acts were dispicable, but he did it bc he thought it was the right thing to do, not because he was evil and had an appetite for violence. Paul himself wrote that he was operating in unbelief that was because of ignorance, it was not willful like the pharisees that opposed Jesus. 1 Timothy 1:12 I thank Him who has given me strength, Christ Jesus our Lord, because He judged me faithful, appointing me to His service, 13 though formerly I was a blasphemer, persecutor, and insolent opponent. But I received mercy because I had acted ignorantly in unbelief,
Also Peter's initial message was to the jews, an accusation and conviction of their crime, them rejecting and murdering the Messiah. They had to repent of that unbelief and be baptized for the remission of sins. He didnt preach Christ crucified as good news, that Christ paid for their sins and if they believed He died in their place they would be forgiven. Maybe later, but definitely not in Acts 2. The cross as good news was not preached then. Paul on the other hand preached to those who never knew Christ. Who had no hand in His death. They could just believe and be saved based on the finished works of Christ on the cross. The death of Christ was preach as wonderful news! Both preached Jesus as the Messiah, both preached saved by faith, yet there were some differences in the beginning.
I hate the word conversion. Paul had an encounter with the Lord Jesus and it was the beginning of his transformation! Paul wasn’t converted to any type of Catholic/Protestant Christianity. Not to say you were implying that but for Paul the Revelation of Jesus based on the Scriptures as well as his encounter was radical.
Also can we just emphasise that gospel literally means “good news”, it’s very normal for interpretations of this good news to differ, Paul’s audience was also very different from Peter’s and most of the other apostles. Even the actual gospels don’t say exactly the same thing because their written by different people. The most important thing is for the message to be the same (which they are) but how they are preached can be different for a multitude of reasons as I stated earlier (due to audience etc.)
The good news originally meant that the kingdom heaven arrived on earth and Jews were asked to join it. The gospel for us Gentiles is entirely different.
@@AnniEast You never know what could happen in the years to come. It's not wise to judge things before their time. Atheists willfully reject God and God can, and indeed does, give them a change of heart.
You misunderstood...I did not say he cant be saved...I said he will not have a Paul experience as he has willfully rejected the truth. Brandon has to soften his heart and open his mind to the truth and only then can he be saved.
@@DruPetty42 no worries, brother, youtube comment section is never a place where we can expect prefect insight to every comment. So much is lost if we dont speak face to face. I appreciate your heart, though, as most would just want to condemn Brandon. But the truth is that God loves him too and wants him to come to the knowledge of the truth. One has to ask, though, at what point does God further harden the hearts of those who continue to harden their own hearts? At what point does He give them over to what they want? I guess we cant know so we continue to pray that they will not harden their hearts further and listen to the Holy Spirit
One of the last subjects apostle Peter wrote about in his last epistle, was to endorse, apostle Paul epistles. 2 Peter 3:15-17 KJVS And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; [16] As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. [17] Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.
Throughout Matthew John the Baptist, Jesus, and the disciples all peached a message summarized as "repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand." Paul's gospel is just a continuation of this... "the kingdom of heaven is no longer 'at hand.' It is here! I (Paul) am writing to you as an ambassador of the new King Jesus"
New? That's literally your imagination and opinion. You can't present interpretations as definitive evidence. There's a reason presumptions aren't allowed in law
Forget about what your "scholars" say and focus on Paul's gospel 1. The gospel of the grace of God. Acts 20:24. 2. According to the revelation of the Mystery; NOT seen by the OT prophets. Romans 16:25 3. Saved by God’s grace through faith APART from works. Ephesians 2:8+9. 4. Sins forgiven through the redemption IN Christ (Romans 3:24) and His shed blood (Ephesians 1:7). 5. Our ‘one baptism’ (Ephesians 4:5) is done by the ‘one Spirit’ (Ephesians 4:4) into the ‘one body’ (1Corinthians 12:13), which is into ‘Christ’s body.’ 1Corinthians 12:27. 6. We receive the Spirit when hearing (Romans 10:17*) and believing (Ephesians 1:13+14) Paul’s Gospel by ‘hearing with faith*.’ Galatians 3:2. 7. We are justified by faith apart from works. Romans 4:4-6. 8. We are under grace and not under law. Romans 6:14. “But when God, who had set me apart even from my mother’s womb and called me through His grace, was pleased to reveal His Son in me so that I might preach Him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with flesh and blood, nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me; but I went away to Arabia, and returned once more to Damascus.” Galatians 1:15-17. The key phrase in the verses above is that God was well pleased to ‘reveal His Son ‘IN’ me,’ so Paul might preach Christ Jesus among the Gentiles and gather the ‘sons of God’ to the ‘body of Christ’ (Ephesians 4:12). God Almighty sent John the Baptist (John 1:6, 33), His Only Begotten Son (after John), the Holy Spirit (Pentecost) with the ‘gospel of the kingdom’ in order to gather members to the prophetic ‘bride’ (John 3:29). However, God sends His ‘Three Witnesses’ through the Apostle Paul in the same way He sends us today because His Only Begotten Son is ‘in’ Paul and ‘God Who Is’ is ‘in’ Christ.
Thank you, I have trouble listening to him, even in such a short clip because he is so false. Yes, he needs our prayer and I hope Jesus will open his eyes within my lifetime. I’d love to see him come to Christ. If it be God will amen.
I don't understand why people hate Apostle Paul so much he was an excellent Apostle of Christ our Lord after spending years persecuting Christians and rejecting Christ. I really hope Brandon finds The Truth that he claims to uphold but rejects simultaneously through false teachings and lies. Exactly brother Michael Jones out here exposing false teachers. AMEN fellow brothers and sisters in Christ our Lord and God bless you ALL 🙏 ❤️ 👊. I'm glad more people are learning to understand The Bible, Christianity and theism in it's context through Apologetics like Inspiring Philosophy 💯. I hate this New Age Theology BS 🤔😕😑. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college student. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't. I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict. Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers. Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word. Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant
Acts 15 - counsel of jerusalem establishes to not practice sexual immorality, strange meat eating and no meats from idol worship! 1 Corinthians 8 - Paul disagrees with meat from idols! It’s okay since an idol is just an idol! But if it offended (weaker) believers, then don’t do it in front of them! Revelations 2:14 - to the church of Pergamum, Jesus said to repent for they hold the ways of Balaam by eating things sacrificed to idols or Jesus will make war with them by his word! In conclusion, Paul eventually taught a different gospel to abolish the law which Jesus still honored due to Christ using OT script regarding Balak as an example!
I disagree 💯. Pual had a different gospel. He Killed new followers of Christ at the time. Promoted how the "NEW" Followers of Christ should behave. Lied 3 times how he "met" Christ. Not to mention that he was from the Tribe of Benjamin, who was prophesied to be " A Wolf in sheeps clothing".
Your videos have been a huge blessing to me. It's amazing how many times I've watched one of your videos, and then later on someone has brough up the very issue you've explained!
St. Michael the Frustrated, before he became the legendary figure who delivers scholarly works to children on Christmas, once punched the heretic Robertson in the face at the second Council of Nicea.
Paul also meets with Peter for several days, years later, & tells him what he's been preaching, so he can get feedback on if he erred in his own preaching of the gospel..
Please do a more thoughroug refutation of this belief, I've met a couple of people that say we are only bound by Paul's teachings and not by the rest because that was binding to the jews.
Paul clearly thought his Gospel was superior as it came from the risen Jesus. We know this because of his public rebuke of Peter (Cephas) and his very clear letter, "the gospel preached by me is not of human origin. " Galatians 1:11.
I think it's really interesting that Both Muslims and progressive 'Christians,' as well as a bunch of other anti-Christ ideologues, CONSTANTLY attack Paul. Makes me think there's a lot in Oaks writing that is pivotally important.
Stuff like this is the problem that arises from everyone supposedly having equal authority to interpret scripture as the Holy Spirit shows them. This, people, is yet another example of why Jesus established His formal, hierarchical church--to hold fast to the teachings the Apostles gave us, whether by word of mouth or by letter (2 Thess 2:15).
I feel Paul is the ultimate test from God. Yeshua said “At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. If we judge people by their fruits; Paul is a bad apple for allowing Stephen to be stoned to death.
The answer is clearly in Galatians 2:7&8 "But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)" When Paul said 'my gospel', he is talking about his divine assignment to take the gospel to the gentiles in contrast to those whose assignment was to the Jews.
Why Paul says "his gospel" I believe, is that there were other gospels preached and he wanted to empathize that he's talking about the things he has teached
Dispensational teachers claim this Gospel by Paul is not the same as the one Preached by Christ. This guy wants to claim Pauls Gospel allows for perversion. Got it. 🤦♀️🤦♀️😳🙄🙄🙄
I've heard it said before that Paul's gospel is a reference to one of the four gospels and his gospel was specifically what would be written as the gospel of Luke since Luke was his close friend and its likely they would have access to the same information, when Paul quotes the gospel, his writings are quotations from the gospel of Luke. Not that the gospel of Luke is contradictory to the other 3 but that he's sourcing his information from what is written in the gospel of Luke.
What? That doesnt even make sense as Paul's letters are some of the first written in the NT, maybe James could have been first, but that is but one possibility. The rest definitely came later. Also Luke never walked with Jesus, everything he wrote was second hand accounts, as you can see with Acts.
@@AnniEast perhaps I wasn't clear in my original comment. I said that I had heard that Paul and Luke had the same sources. I am aware that Paul's letters are dated before the gospel of Luke. I'm not saying Paul quoted Luke but rather had the same access to what Luke used to write his gospel. They were close friends and Paul no more walked walked with Jesus than Luke did. The beginning of the gospel of Luke is stated to be based on eye witnesses so Luke is saying he did research on his gospel account. That probably took time and Paul likely had access to Luke's information. Also to reinforce the idea that I heard this, I'm not necessarily making a truth claim. Anyone who has good reason to suggest that is false, is certainly welcome to do so.
Paul wrote in Galatians 1 For I would have you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by me is not man's gospel.[c] 12 For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ. 13 For you have heard of my former life in Judaism, how I persecuted the church of God violently and tried to destroy it. 14 And I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people, so extremely zealous was I for the traditions of my fathers. 15 But when he who had set me apart before I was born,[d] and who called me by his grace, 16 was pleased to reveal his Son to[e] me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with anyone;[f] 17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me, but I went away into Arabia, and returned again to Damascus. 18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas and remained with him fifteen days. 19 But I saw none of the other apostles except James the Lord's brother. 20 (In what I am writing to you, before God, I do not lie!)
I would add, when Peter boldy proclaimed the Gospel, which is the same Gospel Paul preaches when he says his Gospel, you can still conclude that the Gospelhe calls his Gospel is the same as the Gospel.
My thoughts is simply that Paul owned the gospel message. He took it to heart, and it was dear to him. His gospel that he owned so dearly is the precious gospel of Jesus Christ. It was Paul's, because he loved it so dearly. It is ours, because we love it so dearly. It is the message of our great Lord and savior, and we take hold of it, and own it. My thoughts.
He loved the gospel because after his encounter with Jesus he began to see among many other things the scriptural predictions of the gospel being proclaimed. Roman’s 1:1-17. He also would “marvel”’at the plan of God of salvation, Romans 11:33-36! Sadly something many stumble over today. It seems to me their “cognitive understanding” blinds them to the Revelation of God IN CHRIST!!!
Paul preached the gospel taught directly to him from Christ, as he says his gospel did not come from the other apostles…question? Why would Christ come down from the right hand of God to teach Paul a gospel that already existed?
We should just call Paul the founder of Christianity. Paul was the one who really promoted the idea of the divinity of Christ, the disciples and Jesus said differently and no friendly scholar like Aaron white can change it
Paul definitely preached a different ‘gospel’. He wrote: I want you to know, brothers and sisters, that the gospel I preached is not of human origin. I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ. Galatians As you can see he claimed his gospel is different from any other gospel: it has no human origin. His gospel is from Jesus the spirit not from Jesus the flesh. Mind you he dismisses any teaching of Jesus in the flesh because that was gone and obsolete. The apostles of Jesus were preaching an obsolete gospel. He continues: But when God, who set me apart from my mother’s womb and called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, my immediate response was not to consult any human being. I did not go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went into Arabia. Later I returned to Damascus. Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Cephas and stayed with him fifteen days. I saw none of the other apostles-only James, the Lord’s brother. I assure you before God that what I am writing you is no lie. Then I went to Syria and Cilicia. I was personally unknown to the churches of Judea that are in Christ. He distances himself from the apostles of Jesus. His teaching supersedes theirs and he has no use for them. He has a direct line to Jesus. He even went so far as to curse the apostles of Jesus and the gospel they preach which is the real gospel of Jesus. He writes: I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you to live in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel- which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse! There you have it. He cursed the apostles and the gospel they learned from Jesus. The guy was an antichrist. A false apostle and prophet.
In 2 Peter 3:15&16 Peter says that his message of God’s long suffering being salvation, is the same as Paul’s and the unlearned and unstable wrest (twist) those and other scriptures.
If you read the whole chapter you'll see that he calls it his gospel to distinguish it from the teachings of "those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught" and the whole verse in question is "Now to him who is able to strengthen you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery that was kept secret for long ages." If you read it carefully what paul is really saying is Christ will be able to strengthen them just as paul has taught them and just as Jesus proclaimed he would during his time on earth. It is not a verse primarily focused on whether Paul's gospel is the same as the one preached by Christ on earth but it does claim that they are in agreement, so as far as this verse is concerned it is evidence that paul thought his teachings agreed with Christ's and not the opposite.
Paul said "My Gospel" because at the time gospel or "good news" had a secular meaning too. Let's say a Roman general had won a war, the official declaration of victory is also called gospel. Saying "my good news" is different from just saying "good news". Historical context matters.
I cannot believe nor fathom that I would agree with this guy about anything, but he is right. Jesus preached repentance, water baptism, keeping the Law, forgiving others, and faith in who He was as necessary for salvation. Paul preached faith alone in the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ as necessary for salvation. Those are completely different doctrine. Paul decided that people could not live to be perfect as Jesus, even though Jesus says it is possible through the Spirit, so he decreed all you had to do is have faith and believe. That is a historical fact. You may believe and follow what you will. In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, for Gods glory, you all now know.
Where does Jesus say to stop circumcision so the gentiles will be more receptive to joining the Jesus cult? Where does Jesus even say to worship him and build churches?
Robertson acts like the resurrected Jesus didn’t appear to Paul and tell him what was up or that Paul spent years conversing with the other apostles to make sure their gospels were exactly the same. The Bible itself disproves this idiocracy. Bruh
Bingo, no way The Lord Jesus was going to send someone else, all the preachings and teachings had to come from the 12 apostles, not from one who NEVER met The Lord Jesus in person, when He was alive (before crucifiction) By the way, have you ever read Revelations 21v14 ? it says "the twelve apostles of the lamb", not 13 apostles, there is no paul.
Jesus appointed Peter to lead the church before he ascended. To deny Paul is to deny Peter and thereby indirectly reject Jesus his decision to make Peter the leader of the church. 2 Peter 3:14-16 ''14 So then, dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with him. 15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.''
There's only 1 gospel and that's the gospel of Jesus. Mark 1:1. Paul didn't preach anything different than the gospel of Jesus. Paul didn't have his own gospel.
@@KyrieEleisonMaranatha Mark 1.1 was the Gospel of the Kingdom that was prophesied by the prophets. Pauls preached the mystery that was hidden from before the world began. Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, Romans 16:25 KJV Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; and to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: Ephesians 3:8-9 KJV Now why would scripture say Paul revealed a mystery kept hidden if the disciples preached the same thing? These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. Matthew 10:5-7 KJV Pauls Gospel is found in 1st Corinthians 15 1-4 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; by which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV
It reminds me of the simpsons episode where sleezy attorney Lionel Hutz had a business card that read: "Works on Contingency" "No Money Down" When Lionel was confronted about demanding money, hence calling him a liar, he fake-splained how it actually said: -Works on Contingency"?"- -No. "Money Down!"
One word in one verse and this guy comes up with a brand new, contrary to any other doctrine. Ironic that eight verses earlier we see this: Romans 16: 17 I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them. 18 For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites.
Pauls message makes so much more sense that way bc he was a strict Jew...he learned from the best of the best at that time from Rabbi Gamalio...if there was anyone who could tell the Jews that Jesus was their awaited Messiah...it was Paul...He didnt teach a different Gospel...he taught the same Gospel with his point of view as a strict Jew.....people just believe what they want to believe and nitpick
A Mormon would say the same thing about his or her beliefs, not different or contrictory, just complimentary and in unity to the Gospel taught by Christ and his Apostles.
Who knew that the guy who said Jesus "committed the sin of racism" would be a bad interpreter of Paul.
Practically anybody who acknowledges this guy as the heretical teacher that he is.
@@benobrien547
Still not much better, and still untrue!
It’s usually a mistake to be so certain when psychoanalyzing dead people. IP may be correct here. But, there could be better solutions to this questions we don’t about because of lost cultural contexts-which are myriad.
The trinity is three gods.
@@alonzoharris9049 No it’s not
Robertson is on pace to have atleast 6 new heresies named after him
Nicea hasn't seen a good counsel in a while. Let's send him the way of Arius
@Ben O Brien Those who don't know it........REPEAT it.
The devil has NO new tricks, just the same old same old, with a different "face" accompanying them.
It's not a new heresy. My neighbour was pumping that BS back in 2003
Exactly brother Michael Jones out here exposing false teachers. AMEN fellow brothers and sisters in Christ our Lord and God bless you ALL 🙏 ❤️ 👊. I'm glad more people are learning to understand The Bible, Christianity and theism in it's context through Apologetics like Inspiring Philosophy 💯. I hate this New Age Theology BS 🤔😕😑. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college student. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't.
I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict.
Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers.
Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years
ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word.
Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant.
Jesus loves all of you! Turn to him before it’s too late!
I swear 90% of criticisms of Christianity are literally just people nitpicking what the Bible says.
A lot of people read the Bible like an American lawyer, taking everything at literal face value while ignoring the wider context of the writings.
Even atheists can be literalists. How many boast that they've read the bible from cover to cover? Doing so doesn't mean one is educated.
Also, most of them haven't read it.
@@Vaxxedhole most R former Fundamentalists and that's the same way they view the Bible because it fits their need.
There is no trinity in the bible.
Can we just call this man a cult leader
Sure. I hope he repents and gets saved.❤
@@charlotteroblin5374what is repentance to you?
Yup
I really hope Robert finds The Truth that he claims to uphold but rejects simultaneously through false teachings and lies. Exactly brother Michael Jones out here exposing false teachers. AMEN fellow brothers and sisters in Christ our Lord and God bless you ALL 🙏 ❤️ 👊. I'm glad more people are learning to understand The Bible, Christianity and theism in it's context through Apologetics like Inspiring Philosophy 💯. I hate this New Age Theology BS 🤔😕😑. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college student. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't.
I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict.
Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers.
Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years
ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word.
Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant.
@@justingary5322 “evolution requires life to already exist”. Couldn’t have said it better. Their entire ideology is based off the ignorance of the fact that NOTHING comes from nothing. It’s the complete rejection of truth and reason
Brandon is anti-Pauline bc he loves his sin more than he does God's commands
We all sin, but we must look for forgiveness to Christ, and confess and repent of our sins, but that guy "Brandon" is a false prophet
Paul is a false profit
Many such cases
There are a whole ton of people spreading misinterpretations of Paul's writings, still twisting them around to reflect their own desires, rather than leaving his teaching clear. Sad.
Paul directly contradicts the words of Jesus. Jesus told his followers that their would be false teachers.
Paul also tells how he spent time with Peter (and James maybe?), and compared what he has been preaching with the Gospel they taught and that it was the same.
We should pray for this guy that he finds The Truth and repents.
Before the bible was completed, the truths of the Scriptures, as we know it now, was revealed over time. Peter and the other 11 didnt even know the mystery that Jesus would reveal to Paul more than a year after the resurrection. Peter's sermon in acts 2 was about the Jews killing the Messiah and they had to repent of it and be baptized for the remission of sins. Just on the face of it we can see that he wasnt preaching the wonder that happenend at the cross to those people in Acts 2. He wasnt telling them that their sins were forgiven because Jesus died in their place to satisy the wrath of God and they just needed to believe to be saved. Even though I firmly believe that the 12 and Paul were 100% on the same page at the end, there was most definitely a transitioning period, most cleary observed in the book of Acts. Paul's message was 100% complimentary to the 12's, yet there were deeper truths to be revealed. That first period after pentacost, Peter and the 11 were instructed to only go to the lost sheep of Isreal. And I believe their ministry was to God fearing Jews, especially those who rejected Jesus yet followed the torah. They believed in God, but not yet believed that Jesus was the Messiah. It's really cool to study up on what the Messiah means to the jews. What their expectations were, etc.
Paul had the ministry of speaking to unbelievers, gentile pagans who had no faith in the God of the bible. He didnt come with the accusation of them murdering Christ. He could just tell them who Christ is and what He did for the whole world, and they could come in faith and be saved.
It took a while for Peter to understand all of Pauls teachings and he even warns others that it is difficult and should be studied carefully and not be misrepresented, as for instance the extreme free grace believers would do
funny how Peter and james never mentioned Paul. it's easy to make claims that famous people agree with you, not so easy to show evidence this is the case.
@@velkyn1 galatians 1:18-19 Paul mentions seeing both of them.
Peter mentions Paul in his writtings and they were all together in acts 15. So they most certainly met.
@@AnniEast There is no evidence they met, nor that the events in acts or in any of paul's letters happened. They may have met, but Acts doesn't seem to indicate that since it presents Peter very strangely.
Peter's speech in Acts 15 is most curious since he was supposedly with jesus and jesus said that the law is to be followed, Matthew 5 and Matthew 19, as examples. Why would he have such a change of mind here?
@@velkyn1 no evidence they met? What more do you want than what is clearly written? If you want more than that then we can say there is hardly any evidence for anything that happened 2000 years ago. We werent there. We must trust that the Word of God is reliable.
You problem is right division. It is the problem most people have when they are faced with the apparent contradictions between Paul and James.
They cant reconcile it, so they drop one...usually Paul bc they figure since the others knew Christ in the flesh they are superior. But you just need to recognize you place in the story. Hint, you are part of the Body of Christ
Brandan Robertson twisting the truth like a false prophet.
Can any Christians name one eyewitness to Paul being appointed as a disciple/servant/apostle of Jesus Christ?
@@efootballmania The prisoners that Paul had travel with him that saw the light of Jesus as well. There was also Ananias who baptized and Paul received the Holy Spirit of God.
@@KingNazaru
Acts 9:7
[7]The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone.
Does this men have a name?
Ananias an eyewitness to Paul being appointed as a disciple/servant/apostle of Jesus Christ ? The reference?
@@efootballmania 1. It’s “Do these men have names?” not “Does this men have a name.” (Acts 9.15-16, 19; 22.12-16). Describe Jesus commissioning Paul to go to Damascus to receive further instruction, as well as Ananias baptizing Paul and his sight returning after receiving the Holy Spirit.
@@KingNazaru
They don't have a name?
Why does everyone hate Paul do much?
I think it’s because they say that he preach a gospel that is different from Jesus, for some reasons…
Because he had a good head on his shoulders. And people didn't like it.... especially the Romans.
Since when did sheep like lions anyway?
@@mellieg.7543 Exactly. That's why the Romans killed him.
Idk aswell
Paul explicitly says there is not another Gospel anyway...
"I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel- *not that there is another one,* but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ." Galatians 1: 6-7
@Notim the Judaizers
@_notim_ .
Hi.Pauls gospel has the following criteria,
Galatians 1:11 For I would have you know, brethren,that the gospel which was preached by me is not man's(b) gospel.
(b) footnote.Greek according to man.
Galatians 1:12 For I did not receive it from man,nor was I taught it,but it came through a revelation of Jesus Christ.
Galatians 1:20(In what I am writing to you,before God, I do not lie!) Rsv
Can any Christians name one eyewitness to Paul being appointed as a disciple/servant/apostle of Jesus Christ?
@@efootballmania Most of the 12 apostles.
If Daniel were to say "heed *my* prophecy" to the king of Babylon, does that mean his prophecy is in dialectical tension with the biblical prophecies that come before, or after? Of course not. It's the same with Paul's use of "my gospel." I'm pretty sure a five year old could figure this out.
Homosexuas are more confused than 5-year olds
Paul preached a different gospel.
@@alonzoharris9049 🤦🏽
@@tifeolasupo
Paul has a completely different theology than the gospels. Even the gospels don’t agree with eachother in theology.
People like Michael want to presuppose that all these different books are one book with one author with one theology. That’s how he arrives at his fallacy claim and arguments.
@@alonzoharris9049 you clearly do not understand the gospels in their contexts. You also do not understand Paul's words (hint: Peter said they are hard to understand though). If you want to learn, we could teach you.
Meanwhile, Michael does not presuppose that the books are one with one author. They are four different books written about one person from four different viewpoints (hence differences in details).
Galatians 1: *exists*
Brandon: "Do y' all hear sumn?"
EXACTLY. like, isn’t Galatians ask about the Judaizers claiming Paul was preaching a “different” gospel and Paul proving them wrong? Sheesh.
@@ragazzambulante Not only that, he has some VERY harsh language about the people who preach a different Gospel.
Can any Christians name one eyewitness to Paul being appointed as a disciple/servant/apostle of Jesus Christ?
@@efootballmania Ananias
@@susans3411
And who is the eyewitness to Ananias being appointed by Jesus Christ as a disciple ?
The sad part is that this Guy is a pastor. He once suggested that Jesus was racist and that Lazarus was gay.
WHAT???!!! And i tought that the pastors of my country were weird.
What in the entire Bible made him say Lazarus was gay?
@@aericabison23 his reasoning is that when Jesus says “Lazarus, come out,” it’s a declaration of Lazarus revealing his sexuality and not what it actually is. 🤦♀️
The trinity is three gods.
@@alonzoharris9049 Nothing biblical about this statement.. at all… 😅
One necessary Being spoke the universe into existence.. we know it as one universe.. yet it is three dimensional space: X axis, Y axis, Z axis;
His fingerprint.
One Being, three persons. The Son having two natures, NOT two persons.
Proverbs 30:2-4 an Arabian gentile, named Agur who comes to the knowledge of the triune GOD:
“Surely I am more stupid than any man, And I do not have the understanding of a man. Neither have I learned wisdom, Nor do I have the knowledge of the Holy One. Who has ascended into heaven and descended? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has wrapped the waters in His garment? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His name or His son’s name? Surely you know!”
John 3:13
“No one has ascended into heaven, but He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man.”
John 17:6-8
““I have manifested Your name to the men whom You gave Me out of the world; they were Yours and You gave them to Me, and they have kept Your word. Now they have come to know that everything You have given Me is from You; for the words which You gave Me I have given to them; and they received them and truly understood that I came forth from You, and they believed that You sent Me.”
Brandon is the human equivalent of a migraine headache.
Not to mention that Paul basically says "I'll be damned if I should ever come up with a different Gospel!" (But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse!
Galatians 1:8 NIV)
Ah that must be the dude Jude was saying heaps abuse on celestial beings.
And the angels in Acts 1 and Revelation do preach a different gospel than Paul.
@@ChristinaFromUA-cam He meant the different gospels like Islam, mormonism or the like.
@@PhantommJ but Paul teaches a different gospel than Jesus of Nazareth.
"The Son of Man will send his angels and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."
Matthew 13:41-42
Jesus says in Matthew 24 many false Christs will be taught.
Paul is the worst of the bunch. At least Mohammad doesn't blame Jesus for his Lawlessness. They're both evil, but Paul is worse.
So its crazy to hyperfocus on Islam or Mormons when Paul is the Man of Lawlessness and he himself preaches the Anti-Christ.
It is Paul that Daniel prophesied of as Abomination of Desolation.
2 Peter 3:15-16
@@PhantommJ you can't stop at verse 16.
Without verse 17 someone might not realize Peter is WARNING his audience.
"Therefore, dear friends, since you have been *forewarned,* be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the *error of the lawless* and fall from your secure position."
2 Peter 3:17
Peter may call Paul "brother" when he warns against Lawlessness but Paul calls Peter, James and Barnabas "hypocrites" in Galatians 2 while promoting Lawlessness.
If you accept Paul then you have to believe Peter, James and Barnabas are hypocrites.
Besides, Paul did say he went to crosscheck his gospel with what the apostles were preaching to ensure he wasn't preaching a different gospel.
And they reprimanded him!!!! They told him he’s teaching falsehoods and asked him to bear an oath to stop
@@michael2514 oh, where did you read that?
They didn't, this guys taking the bible out of context. The apostles never said Paul was preaching a different gospel to what they were. Its a weak argument that has no basis.
@@RealRacingClubRRC dude is just quoting out of context... Well, may the eyes of his understanding be enlightened
This is as dumb as saying that when Paul says "I thank MY God" in Phil. 1:3 he acknowledges that his God is not the same God that Jesus preached.
Horrible analogy. I wonder why no one else made the mistake of calling it MY gospel.
There is an excellent chapter in the Historical Reliability of the New Testmament addressing whether Paul is the Founder of Christianity. Definately worth the read. The theology in both Paul's letters and the Gospels complement one another.
Paul never heard of the gospels. How can they be complementary?
@Alonzo Harris He heard the Gospel from those he knew in the early Church such as Peter, and from the Holy Spirit indwelling him. He likely also heard some earlier writings such as Mark.
@@alonzoharris9049 . . . I've never met Robert Oppenhiemer. Can not my views and understandings of physical chemistry be complementary? I've never met William Wilberforce nor John Newton. Are our views that buying and selling men as beasts and cattle uncomplementary?
This is a poor jump in logic. Paul clearly heard the gospel of Jesus, and this reflects in his writings.
@@alonzoharris9049 Example 1.
Cites 1 Corinthians 11:23-25 pg 416.
“All three Synoptic Gospels contain similar words attributed to Jesus on the last night of his earthly life (Mark 14:22-24; Matt 26:26-28; Luke 22:19-20).” -416
“We have seen earlier that Luke almost certainly wrote after Mark, using and editing him, and that a date in the early 60s is the earliest realistic date for the composition of the Gospel of Luke. That means that when Paul was writing 1 Corinthians, dated by virtually all scholars of any theological persuasion to the mid-50s, he could not have been copying Luke’s Gospel. It had to have been the oral tradition that was circulating on which he relied.” -417
“What is more, Paul does not appeal to human tradition here as he does sometimes elsewhere (e.g., 1 Cor 15:3). This information has come specifically “from the Lord” (11:23).” -417
“Both Jesus and Paul, therefore, believed that Christ’s death provided a substitutionary atonement for the sins of humanity (his death huper humōn- “on your behalf” or “for your sake” -1 Cor 11:24; Luke 22:29; cf. Rom 3:25; Mark 10:45), a central tenet of Christianity throughout its history.12” -417
Another great example:
***”He was born as a human (Rom. 9.5) to a woman and under the law, that is, as a Jew (Gal. 4.4), that he was descended from David’s line (Rom. 1.3; 15.12); though he was not like Adam (Rom 5.15), that he had brothers, including one named James (1 Cor. 9.15; Gal. 1.19), that he had a meal on the night he was betrayed (1 Cor. 11.23-25), that he was crucified and died on a cross (Phil. 2.8; 1 Cor. 1.23; 8.11; 15.3; Rom. 4:25; 5.6, 8; 1 Thess 2.15; 4.14, etc.), was buried (1 Cor. 15.40), and was raised three days later (1 Cor. 15.4; Rom. 4.25; 8.34; 1 Thess. 4.14, etc.), and that afterwards he was seen by Peter, the disciples and others (1 Cor. 15.5-7).46” -432
It is amazing how Brandon can quote mine and ignore large swathes of the Bible to spread his demonic agenda.
This guy Preaches a Different Gospel and Different Jesus because it needs to fit His Narrative. Without their Lies their Narrative Dies! Thank you brother, God bless you and your ministry!
I think if you look at the different conversion stories of Peter and Paul you can see why they approach the Gospel from different viewpoints. Paul's conversion was like lightning, a very rapid change from a horrible person to a saved man preaching the Gospel. Peter knew Christ personally, and his conversion was more of a process with many stumbles along the way. They are teaching the same Gospel, but from different personal experiences.
Paul was not really a horrible person by traditional jewish standards, he did what any good jew would do and reject anything that opposed what they(jews) thought to be correct at the time. According to the law those who worshipped other gods had to be stoned. Paul didnt yet understand that Jesus was God.
Paul actually had a lot of zeal for God. He thought he was doing God a service. He was operating in accordance with the law and what he was taught. He was not yet regenerated, but still a believer in God of the bible. His acts were dispicable, but he did it bc he thought it was the right thing to do, not because he was evil and had an appetite for violence.
Paul himself wrote that he was operating in unbelief that was because of ignorance, it was not willful like the pharisees that opposed Jesus.
1 Timothy 1:12 I thank Him who has given me strength, Christ Jesus our Lord, because He judged me faithful, appointing me to His service, 13 though formerly I was a blasphemer, persecutor, and insolent opponent. But I received mercy because I had acted ignorantly in unbelief,
Also Peter's initial message was to the jews, an accusation and conviction of their crime, them rejecting and murdering the Messiah. They had to repent of that unbelief and be baptized for the remission of sins. He didnt preach Christ crucified as good news, that Christ paid for their sins and if they believed He died in their place they would be forgiven. Maybe later, but definitely not in Acts 2. The cross as good news was not preached then. Paul on the other hand preached to those who never knew Christ. Who had no hand in His death. They could just believe and be saved based on the finished works of Christ on the cross. The death of Christ was preach as wonderful news! Both preached Jesus as the Messiah, both preached saved by faith, yet there were some differences in the beginning.
@@AnniEast all good points!
I hate the word conversion. Paul had an encounter with the Lord Jesus and it was the beginning of his transformation! Paul wasn’t converted to any type of Catholic/Protestant Christianity. Not to say you were implying that but for Paul the Revelation of Jesus based on the Scriptures as well as his encounter was radical.
@@fothgt yes I meant his conversion to Christ.
Also can we just emphasise that gospel literally means “good news”, it’s very normal for interpretations of this good news to differ, Paul’s audience was also very different from Peter’s and most of the other apostles. Even the actual gospels don’t say exactly the same thing because their written by different people. The most important thing is for the message to be the same (which they are) but how they are preached can be different for a multitude of reasons as I stated earlier (due to audience etc.)
The good news originally meant that the kingdom heaven arrived on earth and Jews were asked to join it. The gospel for us Gentiles is entirely different.
The message is not the same. The message is completely different.
@@Vaxxedhole No, the Gospel is that God has provided the means of restoration of man with God. That applies to both jew and gentile.
@@alonzoharris9049 see my response to order of treebeard.
@@masterkeep You're skipping ahead. John the Baptist preached that the king of heaven had arrived on earth. That WAS the good news. You skipped ahead.
Brandon needs to be saved; he needs a Paul experience.
He will never receive a Paul experience as he is willfully unbelieving, not just acting in ignorance as Paul was
@@AnniEast You never know what could happen in the years to come. It's not wise to judge things before their time. Atheists willfully reject God and God can, and indeed does, give them a change of heart.
You misunderstood...I did not say he cant be saved...I said he will not have a Paul experience as he has willfully rejected the truth. Brandon has to soften his heart and open his mind to the truth and only then can he be saved.
@@AnniEast It was my fault for saying something so hastily. But you're right.
@@DruPetty42 no worries, brother, youtube comment section is never a place where we can expect prefect insight to every comment. So much is lost if we dont speak face to face. I appreciate your heart, though, as most would just want to condemn Brandon. But the truth is that God loves him too and wants him to come to the knowledge of the truth. One has to ask, though, at what point does God further harden the hearts of those who continue to harden their own hearts? At what point does He give them over to what they want? I guess we cant know so we continue to pray that they will not harden their hearts further and listen to the Holy Spirit
One of the last subjects apostle Peter wrote about in his last epistle, was to endorse, apostle Paul epistles.
2 Peter 3:15-17 KJVS
And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; [16] As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. [17] Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.
Throughout Matthew John the Baptist, Jesus, and the disciples all peached a message summarized as "repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand." Paul's gospel is just a continuation of this... "the kingdom of heaven is no longer 'at hand.' It is here! I (Paul) am writing to you as an ambassador of the new King Jesus"
New? That's literally your imagination and opinion. You can't present interpretations as definitive evidence. There's a reason presumptions aren't allowed in law
Forget about what your "scholars" say and focus on Paul's gospel
1. The gospel of the grace of God. Acts 20:24.
2. According to the revelation of the Mystery; NOT seen by the OT prophets. Romans 16:25
3. Saved by God’s grace through faith APART from works. Ephesians 2:8+9.
4. Sins forgiven through the redemption IN Christ (Romans 3:24) and His shed blood (Ephesians 1:7).
5. Our ‘one baptism’ (Ephesians 4:5) is done by the ‘one Spirit’ (Ephesians 4:4) into the ‘one body’
(1Corinthians 12:13), which is into ‘Christ’s body.’ 1Corinthians 12:27.
6. We receive the Spirit when hearing (Romans 10:17*) and believing (Ephesians 1:13+14) Paul’s
Gospel by ‘hearing with faith*.’ Galatians 3:2.
7. We are justified by faith apart from works. Romans 4:4-6.
8. We are under grace and not under law. Romans 6:14.
“But when God, who had set me apart even from my mother’s womb and called me through His grace,
was pleased to reveal His Son in me so that I might preach Him among the Gentiles, I did not
immediately consult with flesh and blood, nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles
before me; but I went away to Arabia, and returned once more to Damascus.” Galatians 1:15-17.
The key phrase in the verses above is that God was well pleased to ‘reveal His Son ‘IN’ me,’ so Paul might preach
Christ Jesus among the Gentiles and gather the ‘sons of God’ to the ‘body of Christ’ (Ephesians 4:12).
God Almighty sent John the Baptist (John 1:6, 33), His Only Begotten Son (after John), the Holy Spirit
(Pentecost) with the ‘gospel of the kingdom’ in order to gather members to the prophetic ‘bride’ (John 3:29).
However, God sends His ‘Three Witnesses’ through the Apostle Paul in the same way He sends us today
because His Only Begotten Son is ‘in’ Paul and ‘God Who Is’ is ‘in’ Christ.
Robertson needs our prayers
Thank you, I have trouble listening to him, even in such a short clip because he is so false. Yes, he needs our prayer and I hope Jesus will open his eyes within my lifetime. I’d love to see him come to Christ. If it be God will amen.
He's assumed anti-Pauline because Paul refutes his doctrine. It became very clear when he participated in that debate against pastors.
Aint thay the preacher that had something odd happen on stage. Then said it was not God? I believe so, and i believe it was a sign from God.
I don't understand why people hate Apostle Paul so much he was an excellent Apostle of Christ our Lord after spending years persecuting Christians and rejecting Christ. I really hope Brandon finds The Truth that he claims to uphold but rejects simultaneously through false teachings and lies. Exactly brother Michael Jones out here exposing false teachers. AMEN fellow brothers and sisters in Christ our Lord and God bless you ALL 🙏 ❤️ 👊. I'm glad more people are learning to understand The Bible, Christianity and theism in it's context through Apologetics like Inspiring Philosophy 💯. I hate this New Age Theology BS 🤔😕😑. This has nothing and everything to do with the video but please listen if you want to otherwise leave it alone and ignore it. Hello my name is Justin and I'm a fellow Christian and Apologist but I'm also a college student. I'm not a closed minded Theist as I have nothing against Atheists or unbelievers as I speak to them often to understand their reasons for unbelief but we as Christians are convinced of God's Existence due to many real factors). I'm not trying to convert anyone or convince anyone to become Christians as that's The Holy Spirit's job to help people believe but only explain why I believe in Jesus Christ. There's actually evidence of God's Existence in Christianity. First of all there's proof that Jesus of Nazareth existed in history since the writings of Tacitus, Josephus Flavius, Pliny the younger and other historical documents prove that He was living two thousand years ago that even scholars both religious and Atheists agree with historically speaking but not that He's The Divine Son of God because obviously they don't.
I'm going to give you historical and archeological evidence for God's Existence as The Scriptures have prophecies that predate the events recorded in them by several millennia including Matthew, Hosea and Zechariah which prophesy accurately of the people of Israel becoming a nation again after over 1900 years of being scattered around the nations since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 A.D. spoken of by Christ in Matthew 23:29-24:3 and returning to their homeland after The Holocaust with Jerusalem as their capital in 1948 exactly as Jesus The Christ said. The prophets including Daniel spoke of the time where several world empires would arise and fall including the Babylonian kingdom, Medes and Persians, Roman Empire, and Saladin and the Muslims which went in consecutive order for the past few millennia. The people of Israel becoming a nation after The Holocaust in 1948 (ironically the melting point of gold as God compares Israel to gold that's tested in fire in Zechariah 13:8 and Jeremiah 16:15) exactly how Jesus The Christ said would happen since God us everything to come in The Scriptures and not just because people were working towards as Atheists claim which are impossible for any regular man to predict.
Just before anyone says Christianity is a white man's religion made to oppress blacks during slavery you obviously aren't aware that the first Christians were Jews in The Middle East and that Christianity just like any religion can be used by evil and corrupt people to oppress others but you forget that the first Abolitionists/Civil Rights activists were Christians who sought to abolish slavery, racism, segregation, injustice and prejudice throughout American history. Jesus The Christ loves you enough not to give you what we all deserve which is God's Wrath by His Own Blood. Charles Darwin didn't originally come up with The Theory of Evolution over 200 years ago as it is mentioned in the writings of Ancient Greeks who believed in Demons that gave knowledge to philosophers.
Evolution makes no sense when nothing has evolved after thousands of years of human history and supposedly the first creature came from primordial sludge several millions of years
ago funny how they won't believe that God an Eternal Almighty Spirit Being created us from the Earth) which came from a supermassive expansion of matter at high temperature that inexplicably created everything in the known universe that supposedly came from nothing billions of years ago. How did the organs evolve before there were bones, skin, substance and how did any creatures see before eyes evolved? I've studied evolution and abiogenesis in the past and read Darwin's " Origin of The Species" and I'm not convinced of macro Evolutionary biology whereas I accept micro Evolution like speciation and adaptation but not macro Evolution because there's no evidence of it nor clear observable examples of it where living creatures evolve into other kinds of species plus the fact that fossils don't show evidence of evolution and genetic entropy rules out evolution. The question begs how did two genders evolve from a common ancestor with a perfectly hospitable and sustainable environment with breathable oxygen and resources to survive on inexplicably? Atheists have the burden of proof to explain how everything came to be and why our existence is possible without the Existence of God from an godless perspective just as Christians have to provide evidence of God's Existence and the validity of His Word.
Evolution requires life to already exist in order to take any effect in living organisms so it doesn't account for the existence of Life and reality. Also evolution is impossible because it goes against The Law of entropy and the second Law of thermodynamics because evolution makes things better whereas nothing continues to get better but decays and turns to absolute destruction in the end. Mark Ridley an Evolutionist said "No evolutionist whether gradualist or punctuationist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of The Theory of Darwinian Evolution as opposed to special Creation". God's Existence is made perfectly known and observable in the universe as demonstrated in His Handiwork in the intelligently designed manner that Creation was made, human consciences and consciousness historical and archaeological evidence of God's Word being valid history, fulfillment of Bible Prophecies God in His Holiness and Righteousness could give us what we deserve in Hell for our since but He's merciful to give us free will to choose to accept or reject His gift of salvation by grace through faith in His Son Jesus. I don't mean this is any condescending manner but if you'd like to discuss The Scriptures with me or have me listen to your view on anything my instagram account is Savage Christian Kombatant
Acts 15 - counsel of jerusalem establishes to not practice sexual immorality, strange meat eating and no meats from idol worship!
1 Corinthians 8 - Paul disagrees with meat from idols! It’s okay since an idol is just an idol! But if it offended (weaker) believers, then don’t do it in front of them!
Revelations 2:14 - to the church of Pergamum, Jesus said to repent for they hold the ways of Balaam by eating things sacrificed to idols or Jesus will make war with them by his word!
In conclusion, Paul eventually taught a different gospel to abolish the law which Jesus still honored due to Christ using OT script regarding Balak as an example!
This guy tries to discredit Paul mostly because of what Paul says about homosexuality.
i think this is the guy who claims Jesus was gay
I disagree 💯. Pual had a different gospel. He Killed new followers of Christ at the time. Promoted how the "NEW" Followers of Christ should behave. Lied 3 times how he "met" Christ. Not to mention that he was from the Tribe of Benjamin, who was prophesied to be " A Wolf in sheeps clothing".
The early Church had these writings. They saw no conflict. This should tell us something.
Your videos have been a huge blessing to me. It's amazing how many times I've watched one of your videos, and then later on someone has brough up the very issue you've explained!
St. Michael the Frustrated, before he became the legendary figure who delivers scholarly works to children on Christmas, once punched the heretic Robertson in the face at the second Council of Nicea.
Paul also meets with Peter for several days, years later, & tells him what he's been preaching, so he can get feedback on if he erred in his own preaching of the gospel..
I cannot take Robertson seriously. I identify as a progressive Christian, but this man just speaks heresy
When the text conflicts, is unclear, or is errant, then you get to make up the meaning.
Please do a more thoughroug refutation of this belief, I've met a couple of people that say we are only bound by Paul's teachings and not by the rest because that was binding to the jews.
Galatians 1:6-9
If anyone preach to you a gospel besides the one we preach; let him be anathema.
Goodness it was the guy who actually calls himself a pastor! 🤮
“My gospel “ also allows him to differentiate from the early false gospels of the time when writing letters to the churches.
Brandon is definitely sharing a different gospel.
Paul clearly thought his Gospel was superior as it came from the risen Jesus. We know this because of his public rebuke of Peter (Cephas) and his very clear letter, "the gospel preached by me is not of human origin. " Galatians 1:11.
"You got a source on that, Paul?"
"-just trust me, bro."
Gotta love these UA-cam Scholars & Tik Tok Academics.
Self evident and undeniable.
I think it's really interesting that Both Muslims and progressive 'Christians,' as well as a bunch of other anti-Christ ideologues, CONSTANTLY attack Paul. Makes me think there's a lot in Oaks writing that is pivotally important.
Stuff like this is the problem that arises from everyone supposedly having equal authority to interpret scripture as the Holy Spirit shows them.
This, people, is yet another example of why Jesus established His formal, hierarchical church--to hold fast to the teachings the Apostles gave us, whether by word of mouth or by letter (2 Thess 2:15).
I feel Paul is the ultimate test from God. Yeshua said “At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it.
If we judge people by their fruits; Paul is a bad apple for allowing Stephen to be stoned to death.
Complementary ie to complete. Complimentary is to compliment something ie saying something is good.
If that guy does believe that Paul taught a different gospel than Jesus, who does he call Lord, Jesus or Paul?
Shocker, the guy who says Jesus repented of his racism misinterprets scripture again 🤦♂️💀
My goodness... I really admire your patience bro. May God bless you.
Paul was not an apostle, he contradicts Yeshua ...
Jesus loves all of you! Turn to him before it’s too late!
Never mind Galations 2 where Paul shares the gospel that he preaches with the apostles and they "had nothing to add" to what he was preaching.
A stellar book on Paul: From Paul to Mark: PaleoChristianity
Paul and Peter preached two different gospels and you have to purposely ignore scriptures to say otherwise.
The answer is clearly in Galatians 2:7&8 "But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)"
When Paul said 'my gospel', he is talking about his divine assignment to take the gospel to the gentiles in contrast to those whose assignment was to the Jews.
Why Paul says "his gospel" I believe, is that there were other gospels preached and he wanted to empathize that he's talking about the things he has teached
What Brandon meant is, "Brandons Gospel". He just as well say it because it's a separate religion all together at this point.
Dispensational teachers claim this Gospel by Paul is not the same as the one Preached by Christ. This guy wants to claim Pauls Gospel allows for perversion. Got it. 🤦♀️🤦♀️😳🙄🙄🙄
If he'd read Romans 1 he wouldve save you all this time but knowing his theology, that chapter is probably banned 🤷🏾♂️
I've heard it said before that Paul's gospel is a reference to one of the four gospels and his gospel was specifically what would be written as the gospel of Luke since Luke was his close friend and its likely they would have access to the same information, when Paul quotes the gospel, his writings are quotations from the gospel of Luke. Not that the gospel of Luke is contradictory to the other 3 but that he's sourcing his information from what is written in the gospel of Luke.
What? That doesnt even make sense as Paul's letters are some of the first written in the NT, maybe James could have been first, but that is but one possibility. The rest definitely came later. Also Luke never walked with Jesus, everything he wrote was second hand accounts, as you can see with Acts.
@@AnniEast perhaps I wasn't clear in my original comment. I said that I had heard that Paul and Luke had the same sources. I am aware that Paul's letters are dated before the gospel of Luke. I'm not saying Paul quoted Luke but rather had the same access to what Luke used to write his gospel. They were close friends and Paul no more walked walked with Jesus than Luke did. The beginning of the gospel of Luke is stated to be based on eye witnesses so Luke is saying he did research on his gospel account. That probably took time and Paul likely had access to Luke's information.
Also to reinforce the idea that I heard this, I'm not necessarily making a truth claim. Anyone who has good reason to suggest that is false, is certainly welcome to do so.
Paul wrote in Galatians 1
For I would have you know, brothers, that the gospel that was preached by me is not man's gospel.[c] 12 For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ. 13 For you have heard of my former life in Judaism, how I persecuted the church of God violently and tried to destroy it. 14 And I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my own age among my people, so extremely zealous was I for the traditions of my fathers. 15 But when he who had set me apart before I was born,[d] and who called me by his grace, 16 was pleased to reveal his Son to[e] me, in order that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not immediately consult with anyone;[f] 17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me, but I went away into Arabia, and returned again to Damascus.
18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas and remained with him fifteen days. 19 But I saw none of the other apostles except James the Lord's brother. 20 (In what I am writing to you, before God, I do not lie!)
paul is not an apostel and a false prophet. he was misguided by satan. his book is not god's word.
I would add, when Peter boldy proclaimed the Gospel, which is the same Gospel Paul preaches when he says his Gospel, you can still conclude that the Gospelhe calls his Gospel is the same as the Gospel.
My thoughts is simply that Paul owned the gospel message. He took it to heart, and it was dear to him. His gospel that he owned so dearly is the precious gospel of Jesus Christ. It was Paul's, because he loved it so dearly. It is ours, because we love it so dearly. It is the message of our great Lord and savior, and we take hold of it, and own it. My thoughts.
He loved the gospel because after his encounter with Jesus he began to see among many other things the scriptural predictions of the gospel being proclaimed. Roman’s 1:1-17. He also would “marvel”’at the plan of God of salvation, Romans 11:33-36! Sadly something many stumble over today. It seems to me their “cognitive understanding” blinds them to the Revelation of God IN CHRIST!!!
Isn’t that the same preacher that claims to be queer and a Christian? The dude is clearly delusional.
Paul preached the gospel taught directly to him from Christ, as he says his gospel did not come from the other apostles…question? Why would Christ come down from the right hand of God to teach Paul a gospel that already existed?
Because Paul said so?
We should just call Paul the founder of Christianity. Paul was the one who really promoted the idea of the divinity of Christ, the disciples and Jesus said differently and no friendly scholar like Aaron white can change it
All 12 apostles taught the divinity of Christ and so did Jesus himself. That's literally why he was crucified boss. John 5:18, John 10:33, John 19:7.
Paul definitely preached a different ‘gospel’.
He wrote: I want you to know, brothers and sisters, that the gospel I preached is not of human origin. I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ. Galatians
As you can see he claimed his gospel is different from any other gospel: it has no human origin. His gospel is from Jesus the spirit not from Jesus the flesh. Mind you he dismisses any teaching of Jesus in the flesh because that was gone and obsolete. The apostles of Jesus were preaching an obsolete gospel.
He continues:
But when God, who set me apart from my mother’s womb and called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, my immediate response was not to consult any human being. I did not go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went into Arabia. Later I returned to Damascus. Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Cephas and stayed with him fifteen days. I saw none of the other apostles-only James, the Lord’s brother. I assure you before God that what I am writing you is no lie. Then I went to Syria and Cilicia. I was personally unknown to the churches of Judea that are in Christ.
He distances himself from the apostles of Jesus. His teaching supersedes theirs and he has no use for them. He has a direct line to Jesus. He even went so far as to curse the apostles of Jesus and the gospel they preach which is the real gospel of Jesus.
He writes:
I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you to live in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel- which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!
There you have it. He cursed the apostles and the gospel they learned from Jesus. The guy was an antichrist. A false apostle and prophet.
I guess Paul told Aaron w white what he meant to say. 😂
Whoever taught him and whoever hired him to teach the Bible needs to be FIRED.
In 2 Peter 3:15&16 Peter says that his message of God’s long suffering being salvation, is the same as Paul’s and the unlearned and unstable wrest (twist) those and other scriptures.
If you read the whole chapter you'll see that he calls it his gospel to distinguish it from the teachings of "those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught" and the whole verse in question is "Now to him who is able to strengthen you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery that was kept secret for long ages." If you read it carefully what paul is really saying is Christ will be able to strengthen them just as paul has taught them and just as Jesus proclaimed he would during his time on earth. It is not a verse primarily focused on whether Paul's gospel is the same as the one preached by Christ on earth but it does claim that they are in agreement, so as far as this verse is concerned it is evidence that paul thought his teachings agreed with Christ's and not the opposite.
Paul said "My Gospel" because at the time gospel or "good news" had a secular meaning too. Let's say a Roman general had won a war, the official declaration of victory is also called gospel. Saying "my good news" is different from just saying "good news". Historical context matters.
I cannot believe nor fathom that I would agree with this guy about anything, but he is right.
Jesus preached repentance, water baptism, keeping the Law, forgiving others, and faith in who He was as necessary for salvation.
Paul preached faith alone in the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ as necessary for salvation.
Those are completely different doctrine.
Paul decided that people could not live to be perfect as Jesus, even though Jesus says it is possible through the Spirit, so he decreed all you had to do is have faith and believe. That is a historical fact. You may believe and follow what you will.
In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, for Gods glory, you all now know.
Gospel just means good news
A shame he didn't seem to read what Paul said to the Ephesians about "another Gospel."
Where does Jesus say to stop circumcision so the gentiles will be more receptive to joining the Jesus cult? Where does Jesus even say to worship him and build churches?
Robertson acts like the resurrected Jesus didn’t appear to Paul and tell him what was up or that Paul spent years conversing with the other apostles to make sure their gospels were exactly the same. The Bible itself disproves this idiocracy. Bruh
Paul Preaches CHRIST CRUCIFIED!
Jesus warned us of false teachers and prophets who will come in their name. Clearly he meant Paul
Bingo, no way The Lord Jesus was going to send someone else, all the preachings and teachings had to come from the 12 apostles, not from one who NEVER met The Lord Jesus in person, when He was alive (before crucifiction)
By the way, have you ever read Revelations 21v14 ? it says "the twelve apostles of the lamb", not 13 apostles, there is no paul.
Jesus appointed Peter to lead the church before he ascended. To deny Paul is to deny Peter and thereby indirectly reject Jesus his decision to make Peter the leader of the church.
2 Peter 3:14-16
''14 So then, dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with him. 15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.''
It was a mystery kept hidden from before the world began so wasnt the same Gospel as the Gospel of the Kingdom
There's only 1 gospel and that's the gospel of Jesus. Mark 1:1. Paul didn't preach anything different than the gospel of Jesus. Paul didn't have his own gospel.
@@KyrieEleisonMaranatha
Mark 1.1 was the Gospel of the Kingdom that was prophesied by the prophets.
Pauls preached the mystery that was hidden from before the world began.
Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,
Romans 16:25 KJV
Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; and to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:
Ephesians 3:8-9 KJV
Now why would scripture say Paul revealed a mystery kept hidden if the disciples preached the same thing?
These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand.
Matthew 10:5-7 KJV
Pauls Gospel is found in 1st Corinthians 15 1-4
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; by which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; and that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV
A gay guy distorting the bible?! Wow never would've thought!
It reminds me of the simpsons episode where sleezy attorney Lionel Hutz had a business card that read:
"Works on Contingency"
"No Money Down"
When Lionel was confronted about demanding money, hence calling him a liar, he fake-splained how it actually said:
-Works on Contingency"?"-
-No.
"Money Down!"
Is that the woke priest who was giving his sermon on how christians could learn from trans people and then the churches power went out?
One word in one verse and this guy comes up with a brand new, contrary to any other doctrine.
Ironic that eight verses earlier we see this:
Romans 16: 17 I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them. 18 For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites.
Pauls message makes so much more sense that way bc he was a strict Jew...he learned from the best of the best at that time from Rabbi Gamalio...if there was anyone who could tell the Jews that Jesus was their awaited Messiah...it was Paul...He didnt teach a different Gospel...he taught the same Gospel with his point of view as a strict Jew.....people just believe what they want to believe and nitpick
MASSIVE W. God bless you IP, God is truly doing some amazing work through you! ❤️🙌🏼😎
Also Gospel comes from the Greek for good news. He is literally saying "My good news about Christ..."
Anything to twist the scriptures to fit their narrative.
They are completely different. One is of works and one is of complete grace, apart from works. There are MANY verses which reference this
This guy is really an embarrassment to devout Christians who tentatively defend side a
And if that were even the case Paul would be bringing a curse on himself according to Galatians 1:8-9
this guy has to be the greatest heretic of our time.
Eusebius said it was specifically his copy of the Gospel of St Luke
A Mormon would say the same thing about his or her beliefs, not different or contrictory, just complimentary and in unity to the Gospel taught by Christ and his Apostles.