Big thanks to Ridge for sending me this wallet and supporting the channel! Here’s the site if you want to check them out! > ridge.com/S75 Oh and also, do you nerds like data? Well, I recorded a bunch of information over the flight (such as lat/long, engine temperature) so if you want to analyze that, be my guest! Feel free to download the csv here: drive.google.com/file/d/1_dx2Cfos_2amoO7W_nQD6YQ0Ue3P_z65/view
@@Stratzenblitz75 We Australian's have such tiny rockets, but your rocket is a strong masculine rocket. Mucher than miner but. i have always dreamed of a rocket that sheds its weight like a snake. Like a pez dispenser. Yeah a pez rocket! Dude .... make a Pez Rocket. Hahaha
While it didn't die during the flight, it sometimes did if I crashed the plane. One time when I crashed it into the terrain, the game almost exceeded my 32 gb of memory.
He did only ~1/3 of 20th circumnavigation so he had ~2500km to go. Bouncing at 6.2m/s would take almost 5 Earth days, its over 3 times as much time as all the other 19 circumnavigations.
So that would mean if you were to fly from New York to let's say Singapore and you missed the approach (or you're just going around), you would just fly around the earth and try again. Well but one issue remaining is everyone on board starved to death by then...
Lines up pretty well taking into account that kerbin is 1/10 the size then 40,075 x 1.9 (19 rounds on kerbin) = 76,142.5 which is slightly over what he achived, likely caused by altitude variations and differences in equator path compared to the starting flight path
@@Ikaros--- The engine on its own can't get radiate enough heat and will blow up. But it transfers some heat to each attached flags, which each radiate some of the heat, they act like radiators. I think he didn't use normal radiators because those give more drag?
While this true, I wanted to a "low speed" circumnavigation challenge with an aircraft. Of course its really easy to beat this with anything that can get to orbit
"The engine is outputting almost 400 MW of heat." With 107 tons of jet fuel, burning it fast enough to produce that heat would burn through the tanks in about three hours. Kraken: lol conservation of energy
14:20-15:30 That has got to be the most breathtaking sequence I’ve ever seen in a KSP video. The visuals, the music, everything was so perfect it actually made me tear up, bravo sir.
FYI: Fuel consumption is directly correlated with thrust. Thrust decreases with altitude. Conveniently, so does drag. This bears further investigation.
I was really confused when he decided to make something fly at sea level. My efforts to make something akin to an SR-71 got really interesting really quick in terms of how far they could go by flying high and fast. I was impressed he got as far as he did with a low level flight like this.
As someone who has a modest understanding of aerodynamics and thermodynamics - I want to tear my hair out at KSP's silliness. JETS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY! As someone who loves a good engineering challenge, I salute your awesome work, once again! o7
Dude you are BY FAR my favourite YT channel, combining Electronic Gems, 3Blue1Brown, and Scott Manley all into one channel almost. THANK YOU for EVERY SINGLE VIDEO!!!!!!!!!!
It is incredible seeing how far you were able to compromise the other aspects of the plane in pursuit of range while still getting it to work. The fact that it needs to go super sonic to take off and takes multiple laps of Kerbin on a special low lying path to reach it’s cruising altitude is so cool to me.
What happened to your audio from 4:15 to 6:41? (it also happens a bit after flameout again) other than that very cool video, might try this out sometime
You have just invented the powered orbit! Congratulations! With your newfound knowledge (and possibly a bug or two), can you build an aircraft that does not need to land? I think solar may be your best option, but I don't know...
The cinematography is amazing, as always. The low flying shots, the appropriately metal jet engine shrine to the greatest engine of them all, shots with highly specific framing to make room for elements in post… The amount of thought and care that goes into filming these is incredible, and it really shows. I’ve watched your getting to orbit under jet power and Duna under electric power videos at least a dozen times, and they never fail to elicit a sense of awe. But Eve ∞ 2… that one is a masterwork. The music, the cinematography, the sheer scale and engineering of it… it gives me chills every time, even after easily twenty times watching it. Edit: I just rewatched it and how could I forget the *editing!* The smash cuts, the transitions, making use of music beats to accentuate events, make hard cuts feel natural, and so much more! There are so many little details that don’t just *happen.* It takes deliberate thought, time, care, and a loving attention to detail, and you demonstrate all of those time and time again.
The whole lapping plane thing was cool and must have taken a lot of time, but the number of probes he put around Kerban must have taken WAY longer. Give this man a reward or something.
I mean, I know he's just flexing on the whole ksp community at this point, but jeez, the creativity, the effort, he puts into it, it's crazy!! Nice video, as always 😂😂
Yea... I wanted this to be a quicker video, but it turned into a huge endevour to get working. It took several days to optimize my design to the point I was happy with it, and then a literal day to fly the mission. It turned out this is really complicated thing to optimize for. As I mentioned in the video, its not a good idea to load up as much fuel as possible since then you'll end up flying slower. I did a lot of tests to find out what the best fuel loading would be and eventually settled on what I had in the video. In the end, I'm very happy that the supersonic option ended up better. With a subsonic design, I was only getting an estimated 10-15 circumnavigations and that would've taken much longer due to flying slower.
could you adjust for the coriolis force in your program, finding a new path that doesn't require steering? or is it impossible to fly a great circle like that
I once tried making a high distance plane that was meant to operate at high altitudes, I believe I called it the HAPP which stands for HighAtmospherePlanePrototype, and uh I mean it flew, but it was a giant pain to controll(or maybe I just cant be a good pilot) so it often stalker and kinda was not so great
Yes, it turned out to be a lot more efficient. Radiators don't work inside a fairing so they need to be exposed to the airstream to work... Which is a big problem since I'm flying over Mach 1 and thus the drag would be immense. By contrast, flags don't have any drag so I could place as many as I wanted without impacting the performance of the craft. In terms of heat radiated vs. mass, I don't know if radiators or flags are better. I didn't even consider this because the drag was much more important.
@@Stratzenblitz75 and later were finding out flags can generate lift in the right situations. If it wasn't for the part count I'd consider flag cooling.
@@Marxon1134 Yea, funny enough some negative AoA maneuvers with the craft showed a higher L/D than 5.5 over mach 1, which shouldn't be possible with wings. I thought it was an error with the L/D read out, but now I believe that the flags were causing this. Fortunately, the flag lift did not impact this run since the AoA was 0 on them and so they didn't generate any lift.
Just subbed! been watching you for a while a video I watched from you was the mass driver one that was great but on the other hand When Stratzenblitz releases a new video Me: Its about to get crazy
I did a transfer from the KSC to the south pole in 10 minutes with only jet power (all of it below 25km), is it good? (Also, the plane has enough delta-v to circle the earth (probably))
Uh... I'm not an expert but have had a bit of fun with planes. I think the stock Ravenspear Mk3 could probably do it in 15 minutes if you're good at landing, and it's not really a great plane. I threw together a plane in 15 minutes which is its equal but uses much less fuel. I'm almost sure the stock Dove could do it in 10 minutes if you unloaded the oxidizer. The Dove is pretty awesome in some ways; hard to beat for high lift, high speed, & high acceleration, but it's short-range. So... your plane is pretty good; up there with the best of stock.
I did did same thing a few months ago, got 9 times around kerbin exactley, landing at ksc with > 10 units left, part count of around 30 dont remember, with a cruising speed of about 1700m/s at an altitude of 24km
I wonder how much farther you could've gone by staging the fuel tanks and ejecting them once they were empty. It probably would've been a huge pain to deal with the aerodynamics of such a craft, but it might've been worth it.
It is funny how tips to maximize range in KSP are almost entirely different to the ones in real life. Also, your flights reminds me, I once circumnavigated the entire Kerbin using a propeller-powered boat ), with some small plane wheels to cross that land gap, (took few days of real-time, planned out some waypoints and used KOS program to follow them) except starting at KSC and then turning back to it, followed almost 100% the same path as your plane.
Pilot: Tower, be advised. We've got about 5% fuel left. ATC: Copy. Do you need a list of nearby airports for emergency landing? Pilot: Negative, tower. We can reach all of them. ATC: *blink*
unpopular opinion: if a piece of content (audio/video) is allowed to be used in a UA-cam video, then it should be allowed to remain as is even if the copyright status of the content changes.
After stranding Jeb on the island in the middle of Kerbin's big crater after he completed a high speed river run, I built an aircraft to pick up his Aeris 3 and bring it home. It was a tri-plane with dual goliaths. It was also a dual boom, with a claw in the middle. I also just filled it with plenty of fuel for the take off from the desert runway and back with the aeris 3A attached to the belly. The aircraft was so heavy that it took around 3 km of runway to get off of the ground, luckily I took off in a desert. It flew to the island no problem, I had to go through a lot of quicksaves to land the behemoth on a non-flat surface, but eventually I picked up the Aeris and realized that I had barely touched my fuel reserves. I then decided to fly all the way back to KSC, which the aircraft did just fine. I was able to drop the Aeris 3A in front of the space plane hanger, and I noticed that I still had plenty of fuel left, so I took off, and now that the craft was much lighter I didn't need to go beyond the runway, and I flew all the way back to the desert runway successfully circumnavigating kerbin. And I still had some fuel left, albeit not much
Big thanks to Ridge for sending me this wallet and supporting the channel! Here’s the site if you want to check them out! > ridge.com/S75
Oh and also, do you nerds like data? Well, I recorded a bunch of information over the flight (such as lat/long, engine temperature) so if you want to analyze that, be my guest! Feel free to download the csv here: drive.google.com/file/d/1_dx2Cfos_2amoO7W_nQD6YQ0Ue3P_z65/view
I like your ksp content
RIPOFF WALLET
Hey dude.
Is it possible to discard the used fuel tanks to reduce weight?
@@Bibibosh Adding drop tanks like this would allow it go significantly further, but then it wouldn't be single stage anymore.
@@Stratzenblitz75
We Australian's have such tiny rockets, but your rocket is a strong masculine rocket. Mucher than miner but.
i have always dreamed of a rocket that sheds its weight like a snake. Like a pez dispenser. Yeah a pez rocket!
Dude .... make a Pez Rocket.
Hahaha
"The aim of this mission is to achieve low Kerbin orbit."
"Sounds easy enough."
"You haven't heard HOW low..."
It's not a Stratzenblitz video without poor little wings trying their absolute hardest to lift a megachonker
It's also not a stratzenblitz video without over 1000 parts no matter what the size
Its also also not a Stratzenblitz video without spending at least a dozen hours piloting
0:55 never thought I would see a jet engine shrine in my life
No one jet should have so much pow-er!
That engine shines brighter than my future
I want it
Can we take a moment to appreciate this man's PC it didn't instantly die running 3.24 tons of flags
While it didn't die during the flight, it sometimes did if I crashed the plane. One time when I crashed it into the terrain, the game almost exceeded my 32 gb of memory.
rip
@@Stratzenblitz75 I would just to crash
@@Stratzenblitz75 3GB of Ram?! Why not 64 or 128? xD
@@Stratzenblitz75 What are your pc specs?
when that lil bit of water finally comes out of your ear 6:40
15:35 dangit again
i legitimately thought my speakers were dying
Glad I'm not the only one with this issue...
@@keithcrusader it's probably just that the audio in those sections got copyright struck
Stratzenblitz: No clipping tanks
Also Stratzenblitz: *810 FLAGS*
no clipping _tanks_
Never said anything about flags
That moment when you realize that If Stratz had just bounced for a couple more hours, he could've made a nice round 20 circumnavigations....
He did only ~1/3 of 20th circumnavigation so he had ~2500km to go.
Bouncing at 6.2m/s would take almost 5 Earth days, its over 3 times as much time as all the other 19 circumnavigations.
@@cyrylo23 but still.... ;-)
I'll have you all know I tried really hard to make this 20 circumnavigations. Sadly, my optimization efforts didn't quite make it...
What about utilizing the efficiency heat shield wings?
@@Stratzenblitz75 I hope this goes without saying, but I was just messing with ya ;-)
Couldn't resist trolling you a little hehe
classy music choices dude.
The musis is so enjoyable I didn't even skip the continuous and monotonous laps around kerbin. Just went with it (y)
Sadly I am only the 68th like in this comment
a man of culture i see. How ya doing peter?
didnt know you liked ksp
I only curate the best synthwave ;)
As a note for the curious, this aircraft (assuming Kerbal physics in real life) could almost circumnavigate the Earth twice (80,150 km vs 73,308 km).
So that would mean if you were to fly from New York to let's say Singapore and you missed the approach (or you're just going around), you would just fly around the earth and try again.
Well but one issue remaining is everyone on board starved to death by then...
Lines up pretty well taking into account that kerbin is 1/10 the size then 40,075 x 1.9 (19 rounds on kerbin) = 76,142.5
which is slightly over what he achived, likely caused by altitude variations and differences in equator path compared to the starting flight path
@@super4jet We can carry food... Oh wait, Can humans drink Liquid "fuel".
i mean humans have made planes that flew for 2 months straight so its definitely possible but very improbable
@@super4jet you wouldn't starve to death in 2 days
stratzen: im gonna do 19 circumnavigations of the world over 21 hours of real time and land it intact again
ocean: hehe water bouncy
"To cool the engine, I put 3 tons of flags"
Seems alright
I need an explanation of this.
@@Ikaros--- The engine on its own can't get radiate enough heat and will blow up. But it transfers some heat to each attached flags, which each radiate some of the heat, they act like radiators. I think he didn't use normal radiators because those give more drag?
@@kedrednael flags radiate more heat per ton than radiators
@@captainheat2314 Wow that's crazy. Thanks captain heat!
@@captainheat2314 KSP logic at it’s finest
We all know rapiers are the best for endurance flights! The trick is to get above the atmosphere. You don’t even need your engine much after that!
Man's a damn genius. Why didn't he think if getting into orbit. Infinite circumnavigations
@@danielstatler954 there is a way to get to orbit but you need to use momentum from rotation
@@greecevstheworld he made a video on that..
hey that's me in the pilot's seat
How ya feeling after 19 circumnavigation
:husk:
@@prrki well said
I thought you were called Perky
Do you feel tired after hours of flying on a jet?
I have just started doing "real physics" in school, and can I just say, these have been a big help
That's awesome! I'm really happy these videos are helpful for you
What is "real physics"?
@ Ele ta estudando física
Ok Stratz, but you've already done jets to orbit, which is infinity circumnavigations lol
Orbit decay is a thing, but you’re right, it would be thousands of circumnavigations (maybe more I don’t know how aggressive orbit decay in KSP is)
@@crugleberryandfriends4740 past 60 (maybe 70) kilometers, KSP doesn't simulate an atmosphere
@@jackwarbiany6067 it does a little bit if you're in physics warp although that could be bc of floating point errors
@@jamnchips probably the latter. Considering how easy it is to awake the kraken i guess its the error XD
While this true, I wanted to a "low speed" circumnavigation challenge with an aircraft. Of course its really easy to beat this with anything that can get to orbit
This is honestly air-intaking... I mean breathtaking
Breathtaking.
@@turf6863 thanks!
@@davisdf3064 Thanks*
Why must we suffer Reaper poopyhead*
Que the dad jokes
This is what Bradley Whistance means when he says that he is going to take a “shallow ascent profile”.
"The engine is outputting almost 400 MW of heat." With 107 tons of jet fuel, burning it fast enough to produce that heat would burn through the tanks in about three hours.
Kraken: lol conservation of energy
Alternative title: Kerbin's Longest Yeet
or as i would say the worlds longest yeet that doesn't end in a burning pile of wreckage in the first two minutes
I saw you doing this on the discord stream... all I can say is, you had fun trying to land the craft in the water
hehe angry stratz go brrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
🤣
I love how this turned out to also be an accidental infinite range kraken drive watercraft.
A thing thats good on your videos is that we can hear the fun you had while doing that. Dont change.
14:20-15:30 That has got to be the most breathtaking sequence I’ve ever seen in a KSP video. The visuals, the music, everything was so perfect it actually made me tear up, bravo sir.
6:40 when you finally pop your ears
FYI: Fuel consumption is directly correlated with thrust. Thrust decreases with altitude. Conveniently, so does drag. This bears further investigation.
I was really confused when he decided to make something fly at sea level. My efforts to make something akin to an SR-71 got really interesting really quick in terms of how far they could go by flying high and fast.
I was impressed he got as far as he did with a low level flight like this.
For some earthly reference, that's roughly about 1.83 trips around the Earth's circumference
"Special thanks to *the people in the vc for helping with sanity*"
I guess I'm ready to have my mind blown again
Really should be the most upvoted comment
laughs in desk fan with an RTG and wings
1 word: Art.
Absolutely love the mathematical approach.
"We have a strange case of bouncy water."
Next video: infinite range boat powered by bouncy water.
"bouncy water" kinda just sounds like waves
As someone who has a modest understanding of aerodynamics and thermodynamics - I want to tear my hair out at KSP's silliness. JETS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!
As someone who loves a good engineering challenge, I salute your awesome work, once again! o7
Sometimes, I feel like that. I couldn't make a plane like this and be happy with it except just sometimes, like when I'm in the mood for hacks.
Sounds like the both of you need Ferram Aerospace
Dude you are BY FAR my favourite YT channel, combining Electronic Gems, 3Blue1Brown, and Scott Manley all into one channel almost. THANK YOU for EVERY SINGLE VIDEO!!!!!!!!!!
I half expected the bouncing to be part of your plan and have you bounce around the world again.
0:56 the legendary jet engine of glory it will give stranzenblitz75 his likes and subscribers
The distance visualization is super cool!
It is incredible seeing how far you were able to compromise the other aspects of the plane in pursuit of range while still getting it to work. The fact that it needs to go super sonic to take off and takes multiple laps of Kerbin on a special low lying path to reach it’s cruising altitude is so cool to me.
18:06 and he waddles away
0:56 its also the "i break when you touch me with a finger" engine
What happened to your audio from 4:15 to 6:41? (it also happens a bit after flameout again) other than that very cool video, might try this out sometime
There is most likely copyrighted music and UA-cam I believe has a tool that removes the music while attempting to preserve all other audio
@@sb1396u Yeah... I've used it before, not the greatest thing, that's why I always check if a song is copyrighted.
what happened to the audio at 4:10 ?
Copyrighted music
When you realise that his calming and interesting voice got you to watch 20 mins of a plane flying in a straight line..
You have just invented the powered orbit! Congratulations!
With your newfound knowledge (and possibly a bug or two), can you build an aircraft that does not need to land? I think solar may be your best option, but I don't know...
"Let's do this again"
Wait what
*Actually lands this monstrosity at 70 m/s*
w h a t
"I had a lot of fun doing that"... 21hrs straight behind a screen doing circles around Kerbin... not my definition of fun but damn you got my respect
Why is the audio weird past 5 mins
Strange
My guess is that the background music is copyrighted and was cut out by youtube. This results in a very bad audio quality of what's left.
Cause he is in a plane
Copyrighted music. It’s UA-cam’s automatic music removal tool
@@Akotski-ys9rr ah that makes sense I guess
The cinematography is amazing, as always. The low flying shots, the appropriately metal jet engine shrine to the greatest engine of them all, shots with highly specific framing to make room for elements in post…
The amount of thought and care that goes into filming these is incredible, and it really shows. I’ve watched your getting to orbit under jet power and Duna under electric power videos at least a dozen times, and they never fail to elicit a sense of awe.
But Eve ∞ 2… that one is a masterwork. The music, the cinematography, the sheer scale and engineering of it… it gives me chills every time, even after easily twenty times watching it.
Edit: I just rewatched it and how could I forget the *editing!* The smash cuts, the transitions, making use of music beats to accentuate events, make hard cuts feel natural, and so much more! There are so many little details that don’t just *happen.* It takes deliberate thought, time, care, and a loving attention to detail, and you demonstrate all of those time and time again.
I appreciate the time you dedicated to this.. I love ksp and everything related to it... Very cool vids as always
The whole lapping plane thing was cool and must have taken a lot of time, but the number of probes he put around Kerban must have taken WAY longer. Give this man a reward or something.
Was kinda expecting you to end with making a custom version out of rotors and fairings
Any plans for the next livestream?
With (custom car engine) - fuel injector and burner torch?
Congratulations. You built a... Loiter capableish intercontinental supersonic cruise missile, with terrain guidance. What the hell.
For reference, the longest IRL flight was 41,467.46 km by Steve Fossett
In the 60's a couple of guys flew a cessna during almost 70 days covering 150,000 miles.
That was with refuelling tho...
@@dsdy1205it's still a long flight
I’m expecting the next video to be something like ‘in flight drilling and refuelling’ or ‘air to air refuelling’
I appreciate seeing LaTeX in a KSP video
Great video, amazing editing, and love how you do data collection. Really inspires me to learn more. :)
Thank you! I did the data collection with KRPC. If you're interested in programming, I highly recommend you check it out; its super versatile
Damn that was almost 1 and 7/8 of a circumnavigation of the IRL Earth
Absolutely mindblowing! I don't have any other words to say.
Thank you Ondrik!
Why is the audio busted? Around 5-7 minutes in.
I mean, I know he's just flexing on the whole ksp community at this point, but jeez, the creativity, the effort, he puts into it, it's crazy!!
Nice video, as always 😂😂
The amount of time you must have put into this video is ridiculous
Yea... I wanted this to be a quicker video, but it turned into a huge endevour to get working. It took several days to optimize my design to the point I was happy with it, and then a literal day to fly the mission.
It turned out this is really complicated thing to optimize for. As I mentioned in the video, its not a good idea to load up as much fuel as possible since then you'll end up flying slower. I did a lot of tests to find out what the best fuel loading would be and eventually settled on what I had in the video.
In the end, I'm very happy that the supersonic option ended up better. With a subsonic design, I was only getting an estimated 10-15 circumnavigations and that would've taken much longer due to flying slower.
And after all that, my favorite bit is the kerbal on the beach
could you adjust for the coriolis force in your program, finding a new path that doesn't require steering? or is it impossible to fly a great circle like that
Huh, thats a very interesting idea. If I do this again, I'll have to see if I can do that
Everyone else using flags as cosmetics and Strats is here using them as radiators and light speed progectiles
I once tried making a high distance plane that was meant to operate at high altitudes, I believe I called it the HAPP which stands for HighAtmospherePlanePrototype, and uh I mean it flew, but it was a giant pain to controll(or maybe I just cant be a good pilot) so it often stalker and kinda was not so great
Imagine a rocket engine with this efficiency.
It's called a kraken drive
@@t_y8274 e v e n b e t t e r
Its the Legendary N U C L E A R T H E R M A L E N G I N E
yep
nerve engine
@@XTARSAGENCY about a quater of isp
I love the love you put on your videos. THANKS
wow. I never really used goliaths for anything before except for airliners. Now I really want to make a laythe SSTO with them
Amazing video and at 7:00 do I hear one of my favourite tracks! by FM-84! :D "Fade" (Running In The Night)!!! and Maverick!!
"Oh no the nose cone blew up. Gotta try that again."
Me: Oh I lost an engine, a landing leg and a Kerbal. Eh that's the best I got time to go home.
Eh its *just spares*
Was passive cooling via flags really more efficient than active cooling and an appropriate power supply?
Yes, it turned out to be a lot more efficient. Radiators don't work inside a fairing so they need to be exposed to the airstream to work... Which is a big problem since I'm flying over Mach 1 and thus the drag would be immense. By contrast, flags don't have any drag so I could place as many as I wanted without impacting the performance of the craft.
In terms of heat radiated vs. mass, I don't know if radiators or flags are better. I didn't even consider this because the drag was much more important.
@@Stratzenblitz75 and later were finding out flags can generate lift in the right situations.
If it wasn't for the part count I'd consider flag cooling.
@@Marxon1134 Yea, funny enough some negative AoA maneuvers with the craft showed a higher L/D than 5.5 over mach 1, which shouldn't be possible with wings. I thought it was an error with the L/D read out, but now I believe that the flags were causing this.
Fortunately, the flag lift did not impact this run since the AoA was 0 on them and so they didn't generate any lift.
@@Stratzenblitz75 this game is 4d spaghetti code I swear.
SUPERLIMINAL WHEELS!
Bro why when you get to the part where u introduce the thing the voice goes weird???
UA-cam compression over time, I watched it long ago and it sounded normal
@@chwedcheesebgr It'll be because UA-cam or himself has isolated his voice probably because of copyrighted music.
@@Almond_ESQ that doesn't explain the dive in quality in the voice unless it was lazily done and was left low bit
I love FM84 holy shit. Never thought I'd see someone using his stuff in a KSP video of all places.
Just subbed! been watching you for a while a video I watched from you was the mass driver one that was great but on the other hand
When Stratzenblitz releases a new video
Me: Its about to get crazy
Looks like you did get hearted, gg
told ya
Your videos are insanely underrated!!
I did a transfer from the KSC to the south pole in 10 minutes with only jet power (all of it below 25km), is it good?
(Also, the plane has enough delta-v to circle the earth (probably))
Uh... I'm not an expert but have had a bit of fun with planes. I think the stock Ravenspear Mk3 could probably do it in 15 minutes if you're good at landing, and it's not really a great plane. I threw together a plane in 15 minutes which is its equal but uses much less fuel. I'm almost sure the stock Dove could do it in 10 minutes if you unloaded the oxidizer. The Dove is pretty awesome in some ways; hard to beat for high lift, high speed, & high acceleration, but it's short-range. So... your plane is pretty good; up there with the best of stock.
@@eekee6034 oh a lot of stuff happened since i made this comment, my new plane is capable of doing atmospheric orbits now :D
My man had a sponsor,let's congratulate him:)
I did did same thing a few months ago, got 9 times around kerbin exactley, landing at ksc with > 10 units left, part count of around 30 dont remember, with a cruising speed of about 1700m/s at an altitude of 24km
discovering the wiggler drive by accident was a great way to finish this.
What’s with the sudden audio quality decrease?
I wonder how much farther you could've gone by staging the fuel tanks and ejecting them once they were empty. It probably would've been a huge pain to deal with the aerodynamics of such a craft, but it might've been worth it.
9:30
mmyes powr
"We've also run out of ice shit" 7:04
Is it possible to be disconnected feom earth's servers if you have too much Jet Lag?
These are the best ksp videos available. Keep up the good work.
5 days 4 hours = 34 hours of continuous flight
kerbin days are 6 hours long, so that does work out to 34 hours. Its is weird how short kerbin days are
Then again, the kerbin Soler system is a lot smaller than earths. (I'm shore everyone knew that)
And I'm sure I spelt shore right
It is funny how tips to maximize range in KSP are almost entirely different to the ones in real life.
Also, your flights reminds me, I once circumnavigated the entire Kerbin using a propeller-powered boat ), with some small plane wheels to cross that land gap, (took few days of real-time, planned out some waypoints and used KOS program to follow them) except starting at KSC and then turning back to it, followed almost 100% the same path as your plane.
is it just me or does the audio sound like he's underwater sometimes in this video
yeah i was wondering why nobody pointed this out
@@yeetus9191 copyright
copyright
Pilot: Tower, be advised. We've got about 5% fuel left.
ATC: Copy. Do you need a list of nearby airports for emergency landing?
Pilot: Negative, tower. We can reach all of them.
ATC: *blink*
unpopular opinion: if a piece of content (audio/video) is allowed to be used in a UA-cam video, then it should be allowed to remain as is even if the copyright status of the content changes.
I like how this contraption is capable of going SO FAST that it's capable of racing the goddamn Sun. that's poggers as hell
hehehe the plane looks like me drawing a goose at age 5
As always, a remarkably impressive video, can’t imagine the work that went into it, thumbs up for sure
If you crash this thing you’re going to have an instantaneous ecological disaster with all that fuel
I like this guy. he plays games to learn and use math and stuff. I enjoy hearing about all this. subscribed
Why is UA-cam recommended always so up to date?
I love your commentary vids, really combine well with the epic music video skills!
I want to play with that "sol flyer" now to reverse engineer it
After stranding Jeb on the island in the middle of Kerbin's big crater after he completed a high speed river run, I built an aircraft to pick up his Aeris 3 and bring it home. It was a tri-plane with dual goliaths. It was also a dual boom, with a claw in the middle. I also just filled it with plenty of fuel for the take off from the desert runway and back with the aeris 3A attached to the belly. The aircraft was so heavy that it took around 3 km of runway to get off of the ground, luckily I took off in a desert. It flew to the island no problem, I had to go through a lot of quicksaves to land the behemoth on a non-flat surface, but eventually I picked up the Aeris and realized that I had barely touched my fuel reserves. I then decided to fly all the way back to KSC, which the aircraft did just fine. I was able to drop the Aeris 3A in front of the space plane hanger, and I noticed that I still had plenty of fuel left, so I took off, and now that the craft was much lighter I didn't need to go beyond the runway, and I flew all the way back to the desert runway successfully circumnavigating kerbin. And I still had some fuel left, albeit not much
Range is technically infinite with in-flight refueling.
wow. just wow. why are you so dedicated to us?!?! 21 hours! jeez dude, you didn't need to do that!