14.5b Derivation of the Integrated Rate Laws | General Chemistry

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @andreandes7485
    @andreandes7485 9 місяців тому +21

    I suck at memorizing math. I like to prove what I’m doing. Which can Be a pain when doing general chemistry so thank you so much for this video

    • @ChadsPrep
      @ChadsPrep  9 місяців тому +2

      Glad the channel is helping you - Happy Studying!

  • @parsabehnia1281
    @parsabehnia1281 8 місяців тому +6

    nice to see proof search process for formulas in Gen-Chem, a very rare thing to see :) thanks for the clearance

    • @ChadsPrep
      @ChadsPrep  8 місяців тому

      You're welcome and Thank You.

  • @zahraaa59676
    @zahraaa59676 3 місяці тому +1

    This made everything so easy. Thank you so much!
    There’s another part which I wished to see, second order with two reactants instead of one. That part is very difficult right now, and I wished to see it in this video.

    • @ChadsPrep
      @ChadsPrep  3 місяці тому

      Glad you found it helpful. I'll keep that in mind for a future video.

  • @nicoscool2333
    @nicoscool2333 Рік тому +5

    Yay I’m in calculus and so chem I can do this now I don’t have to remember the integrated rate laws

  • @mackfieldgeorge
    @mackfieldgeorge Рік тому +1

    You're my academic guardian angel 😇

  • @Crystalfieldtheory
    @Crystalfieldtheory Рік тому +1

    Great explanation!

  • @jakyrabailey7940
    @jakyrabailey7940 Рік тому +2

    You are saving my chem grade rn.thank you!!

    • @ChadsPrep
      @ChadsPrep  Рік тому +1

      Glad the channel is helping - Happy Studying!

  • @aditibhatnagar2984
    @aditibhatnagar2984 11 місяців тому +1

    Rate law for second order =-1/2× dA/dt and rate=k[A]^2

  • @Chemcrown
    @Chemcrown 3 роки тому +5

    keep it up sir

  • @OnkarPawar00
    @OnkarPawar00 3 місяці тому

    Had this derivation in our chem textbook

  • @ÇağatayDönmez-k4g
    @ÇağatayDönmez-k4g Рік тому +1

    You are a great man!

    • @ChadsPrep
      @ChadsPrep  Рік тому +1

      Thank you - Happy Studying!

  • @user-yl5nc6ct6l
    @user-yl5nc6ct6l 2 місяці тому

    4:58 1/[A] integrates into ln[A], but why did you ignore the dA doesn’t that integrate into A ?

    • @Sphynxx9
      @Sphynxx9 Місяць тому

      It been a few years since I took calculus but I believe it just notation. You’re probably used to seeing dx which means the derivative with respect to x. In this case it’s the derivative with respect to A.

  • @MayaWaller
    @MayaWaller Рік тому +1

    bless you sir

  • @childofgod5818
    @childofgod5818 Рік тому +2

    ty!

  • @evaalao1613
    @evaalao1613 Рік тому +1

    Fight the good fight of faith bro 😉☺️

  • @tobymoy84
    @tobymoy84 11 місяців тому +1

    Thank youu

    • @ChadsPrep
      @ChadsPrep  11 місяців тому

      You're welcome!

  • @aditibhatnagar2984
    @aditibhatnagar2984 11 місяців тому +2

    Derivation for second order is wrong....check the rate law

    • @RyanRibeiro-te3ns
      @RyanRibeiro-te3ns 10 місяців тому

      No, sir. It's correct. Finishing the integration you get to the equation of second order. Or maybe I just did not understand what part you said that it was wrong

    • @peterlohnes1
      @peterlohnes1 4 місяці тому

      I think what you're focusing on are the negatives, but because everything becomes negative, you simply multiply both sides by negative one, and you get the integrated rate law. His one mistake was not finishing the 2nd order example to completion to show how that happens.