Derivations of 0th, 1st & 2nd order integrated rate law

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @abhijeet_ghosh
    @abhijeet_ghosh Рік тому +2

    Sir, this was extremely helpful. My chemistry class is made up of a majority of students who dont know calculus, and therefore the teacher just gave us the formulas and a brief explanation. This helped me understand 🙏

  • @tomasb7645
    @tomasb7645 3 роки тому +2

    This us one SWEET calculus-based explanation at deriving the integrated rate laws! THANK YOU!!!

  • @jeridahketty8280
    @jeridahketty8280 Рік тому

    This is now the best have been looking for, thank you.

  • @travisyoung6055
    @travisyoung6055 2 роки тому +1

    Amazingly comprehensive for the maths layman such as me

  • @nedeisenberg
    @nedeisenberg 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks for the thorough and descriptive video - really helped.

  • @MrMomentum1
    @MrMomentum1 8 місяців тому +1

    Incredible

  • @peterquiroz8899
    @peterquiroz8899 6 років тому +1

    Thank you sooo much. This video was very useful for a paper of mine!

  • @debisadebela9263
    @debisadebela9263 3 роки тому

    thank you verry much i appreciate you guys u are a genius man!

  • @anonimoalasad9581
    @anonimoalasad9581 Рік тому

    In case anyone missed it as i did, during the proof of the 1st order law the integer of d[a]/[a] is equal to ln[a] due to the fact that if we derived ln[a] we would have to apply the power rule and take the derivative of the ln (1/a) times the function embbeded inside the function, [a].

  • @DaniellaObikunle
    @DaniellaObikunle 2 роки тому +1

    Very precise, thank you.

  • @jarencascino7862
    @jarencascino7862 3 роки тому +2

    paying thousands to go to college just so I can look up a free video that does a better job of teaching it

  • @LochanKutz
    @LochanKutz 4 роки тому +3

    hello sir, your sign for the integral is wrong.
    the video was good either way.

    • @MrGrodskiChemistry
      @MrGrodskiChemistry  4 роки тому +2

      You are right! Great edit! For some reason I always wrote them that way.

    • @LochanKutz
      @LochanKutz 4 роки тому +1

      @@MrGrodskiChemistry 😁👍

  • @funnymalia8581
    @funnymalia8581 3 роки тому

    the only problem you have is that you uploaded this really long before people were interested in this :) If u had posted this sometime in the past year or so, you would surely have at least 50k views :) great work man!! you've done a really fine job! I sincerely hope more people find this gem.

  • @doer6002
    @doer6002 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much.

  • @SS-pn7ss
    @SS-pn7ss Рік тому

    Thankyou so much

  • @sakshishukla41
    @sakshishukla41 3 роки тому

    Hi, thanks for the video. However, I am still confused why [A] is constant (on the right side of the equation) in the differentiation for the first order equation?

    • @copiryte9535
      @copiryte9535 3 роки тому

      -d[a]/dt=k[a]
      in order to integrate both sides we need to get the same variables on both sides of the equation
      first lets get both [a] on one side and dt on the other side like so:
      d[a]/dt=-k[a]
      [a]*d[a]/dt = -k divide by [a]
      [a]*d[a] = -k*dt multiply by dt
      now plug in your integrals and you can solve!

  • @alexanderstephenson4120
    @alexanderstephenson4120 2 роки тому

    thank you so much :)

  • @achiriu1987
    @achiriu1987 2 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @dernayt2728
    @dernayt2728 2 роки тому

    Video is really helpfull, idk why but the textbook I use just wrote the equations without derivation. Btw, is it legal to integrate both sides with different variables in 14.33