Hello guys. Firstly, the terms masculine and feminine are by no means trying to insult one or the other. One culture was adept at war, while the other was more adept at spiritual practice - it's not that one is better than the other. The point is everyone is a mix, which means everyone can embody the qualities of both. Please also watch the clarification video which is next in line (Part 3) PS. There is a misconception that the Aryans are 'European' - they were NOT, they were from the Eurasian Steppe, near the Caucasus mountains (hence the word CAUCASIAN). This is not a European invasion of any sort. They are far more ancient than any concept of "Europe".
Are you getting this info from sadhguru because he is totally wrong about aryan - dravidian history.... check out Rajiv Malhotra on youtube for that.. For eg... Sadhguru states that "In South India, they don’t ascribe to the Vedas." is nonsense. Shankaracharya (Kerala), Ramanuja (Tamil Nadu) & Madhavacharya (Karnataka), who wrote Bhashyas for Brahmasutras are from South India. Pandyas & Cheras participated in the Mahabharata war! There are hundreds of Vedic shakas in South India. There are 2 cosmologies: Chandramana & Souramana and both are practiced in south. Vedic Jyotisha is practised in a major way and is the mainstream astrology. So for sadhguru to say that South India or dravidian culture was not part of Vedic culture is a false statement. Aryan-Dravidian theory is completely bogus. There is no scientific evidence for it ...again search for rajiv malhotra on youtube.... Sadhguru is good as an enlightened master in teaching yoga but not so much in history... This video says that the "indigenous" People considered Earth as their mother not the Supposed "Aryans" is completely Baseless. "Mata Bhoomi: putro aham prithvya" (Atharva veda (12.1.12) (meaning: Earth is the Mother and I am her son) is enshrined in the Vedas and no where in the Vedas its said that GOD is somewhere in the SKY on the contrary Vedas firmly establish that GOD is present every where as the all pervading consciousness "Sarvam khalvidam brahma"..
Infognostica thankyou for your efforts. I understand you mean no harm or foul play in any sense. But it turns out there is lot to be uncovered on this topic. All we can do is try our best to search for more information and keep the discussions going...:)
I'm not getting it from Sadhguru guys, there is strong evidence that it happened, hapolotypes show inward migration c.4000 years ago. This is NOT about western imperialism, as the aryans were NOT Europeans - they were just related to them. Everyone is now a mix.
@King George that's fake news by British to dhravids and Aryan are originated in india & all have same treditions and life style all are spiritual and not warmongers like west & middle east.... We are descendants of Aryan and dravids we are Indians then mongals & British spoiled every thing distroyed history...
@@maruthimaruthi3720 But I will we must considers the Muslims as much Indians as us who have been living and dying here since generations. Who don't have anymore connections with other nations.
@@andyparackal7471 there are no dravidan and aryan and it is proven many times new DNA findians from rakhagiri and stuff from keeladi site back this statement
how were the dravidians masculine, if their gods were all women, and they never developed proper weaponry? how were the aryans feminine if they conquered the dravidians, due to superior technology and physical characteristics? now here's something for you to sit with; when the pastoralist, raw milk drinking, curd-eating aryan warriors with blue eyes and golden hair matched with golden skin from a lifetime of basking in the sun of the eurasian steppe, rolled in on chariots and found a matriarchal society of shorter and swarthier people living off of grains and worshipping sculptures of obese women, and subsequently conquered these people, who were the "masculine" ones and who were the "feminine" ones?
@TamilArasan-rg6zl No they were black people, the rakshasa mentioned in Ramayana and Mahabharata were Dravidians, After intermixing of Aryans and Dravidians, brown skin tone came
@@rlmpproductions the original Dravidian (proto Dravidian) were Iranian farmers, but when they migrated to South India they intermix to the hunter gatherers Wich have dark skin and create the Dravidian language (not longer a proto-dravidian)
Haha!! Similar to Aryan Invasion is the Zimbabwe history. When British found an old civilization there... They said it was made by our old white ancestors who came many thousand years back, before us. The point they try to make is... Anything of significance has to be by them or their ancestors. This is how they put supremacy in their work
Keshav I am not sure how you think? www.thehindu.com/society/history-and-culture/theres-no-confusion-the-new-reports-clearly-confirm-arya-migration-into-india/article29409611.ece/amp/
@@sumanrai8921 that was British laziness to name all non Islam, non Christian,non Jain,nonsikh as Hindu , we do not have same culture , tradition, beliefs, language as utterpradesh
@@matthewmartin2422 Sinauli is a new archeological site( the largest ever metropolitan burial site found) which debunked this theory. As the burial site is more than 4200 years old and has warrior class women (The first female warriors ever) and war chariots in the grounds which even pre-dates Mesopotamia (which was believed the first chariots till now)
@@babla69420 I am a telugu Hindu and in my family dead people are buried.... I am sorry to break your bubble but Hinduism is not a religion but a belief system and way of living. You cannot confine it to a rule book like other faiths there 100000's sects of people who follow different customs for different reasons and the point is.. yes! People are buried after death in various places in india since the inception of time as we know it... Edit: even saints who were buried still recieve prayers in india, example... my family devotes to raghavendra swamy in mantralayam a place where I have been many times since childhood. All the information is just Google away, it just takes an effort to listen and a mindset to understand...
@@Sai_2346 omg nigga tries to break bubble, well since we playing this game im a fair northie from a brahmin family, pretty sure came from southern Kazakhstan 4000 years ago, and lemme tell you indra agni and varun the major gods of vedic ideology are nowhere to be found among harappan gods, and worship of phallus wasn't very popular in vedic culture whereas there are a ton of evidence phallus was worshipped in harappa. The later hinduism was a result of mixing of then developing aryan and declining harappan cultures. I don't know what do you bhakts are trying to achive by denying the aryan migration, like we're all literally migrants from africa what is the point of denying and twisting scientific researches to prove a single race of homogeneous indians with their own purely indigenous religion without any outside influence. K i gotta go now lal salam
Aryans were organic to Indian peninsula & Himalayan ranges but shitty people still believe in aryan invasion theory in age of DNA science 😂 it's fkin hilarious
@@hemishshah6666even first people came from South Africa, it is was Dravidians who settled in India first time, which is also called indus valley civilization
@@zuxic8124 ACTUALLY... NORTH INDIAN PPL ARE MIGRATED FRM... IRAQ, IRAN, WEST AND EVEN FRM CENTRAL ASIA TO NORTH IÑDIA... IN MIDDLE/UPPER PALEOLITHIC AGE... PPL OF SOUTH IÑDIA... THEY STARTED THEIR OWN CULTURE FRM THERE ITSELF...
BY THE WAY... IÑDIA IS HUGE DIVERSED COUNTRY... BEING AN IÑDIA TOGETHER... WE'VE TO RESPECT... OUR HUGE DIVERSITY... N ALSO WE'VE TO FEEL PROUD FOR, LARGE DIVERSE, LARGEST DEMOCRACY IN D WORLD 🤟😎🚩🇮🇳♥️🔥
@@zuxic8124 BEING A COMMON MAN... WT CAN I DO FOR THEM MAN🥺.. I'M NOT A LEADER TO BRING THEM BACK FRM THERE... U KNW... NARENDRA MODI.. IS REALLY A GRT LEADER... COZ OF "CAA" HE'S BRINGING BACK HINDHU, BUDHA, JAIN, SIKHS OF IÑDIA FRM PAK, BANGLADESH ETC. ETC., I CAN DO NOTHING FOR THEM MAN... BT HE DOES... LET'S WISH HIM GRT .. THAT'S IT😊👐
@Khushal Singh no dude aryans came from top side of Asia and after that they traveled to all over the world there is Aryan logos in iran and Greece and es near Caspian see and in India too
@@greaterbharat4175 dude as persian/kurd and an Iranian we have still some of old world from aryans in our language night =Nacht nicht =nist (zano) means knee to is one old aryans world and ............ and names to still use =Armin Arta Arya Aryan Artin Arses Arvin Artemis Arat Armando Aryana and....
@@armin3068 iranin are only languagestic indo European , zoroatrianism God is ahura Mazda ( asura) ,asura is assarians deity which they monothiestly worshipped , devtas are demons in zoroatrianism but all Indo Europeans call Their Gods as devta but not zoroatrians
@@armin3068 ashura/ ahura Mazda dipiction similar to Mesopotamic god ( anunakis with wings ) not to Indo Europeans dipiction / and about now iranin are Islamic
Oh God save my country. Let my fellow Indians realise that being mixed race is not a sin and no one cares indeed. and plz save us from the people with religion mask 😂😂😂
I am a Malaysian Indian and I agree with you. My cousin's husband is a Chinese and my uncle's wife is a Malay.... And their children are all hybrid. Lol
In Southern Kerala, until 1947, the family wealth was inherited by daughters and not sons. The 700 year old kingdom of Travancore had kings who are sons of King's daughter. If king had only sons, they adopt a daughter and marry her and the next king will be her son's.
Not all south Indians are Dravidians. Especially Kerala is established by Aryan Immigrant Brhamins. Brahmins from Kerala formed senators of various Indian kingdoms. As trade with these kingdoms became expensive affair, Rome realized that disintegraiting indian kingdoms is possible by evangelizing kerala.
@Msvks Kerala did exist before with Tribal population. It has history going back to BC 5000. The tribal population exist still. Something like Maoris of NewZeland.
@Msvks Racism doesn't always means hatred. Before Hitler, it was not a word for Hatred. Races can co exist peacefully without intermixing if they botb have self-respect and not under influence of foreign ideologies. The tribes live in forests. They grew honey for the king inside the border forests. In ancient times, Islamist attacks via forest were blocked by releasing honeybees. Watch this. ua-cam.com/video/hOhZKAGgbQU/v-deo.html
If take a closer look at northern India and parts of Pakistan, you can see some people who have slightly lighter skin and lighter hair. Maybe even blue or green eyes and reddish or even slight dark blond hair. The facial structure looks more similar to that of Europeans. Whereas in southern India, many locals look almost black and faces like Aborigines or Africans. very fascinating.
Not not true Dravidian also have blue ,green eyes even they are dark ( but they can be light tho ) I sees blue eyes man in south India and he has brown skinned ( most of north isn't fair but wheatish ) fair people are central Asian , Pakistan ( due to pathans, Indo Iranic people)
Lol not true, I'm a Pakistani we clearly don't have people of those phenotype who you are describing. Maybe we do but they are less than a 1% a very very small minority. Although you can find people with light/white skinned and black hair and eyes in India and Pakistan both the regions.
they have dark skin but they dont look very similar to africans at all in terms of features. its a unique population and as such the comparison is unnecessary, aboriginal/melanisian people are actually the least closely related to africans out of any population on earth.
@@Quizooh North Indians are from Indus valley civilisation... IVC is not destroyed by aryans or anyone... It's destroyed by soil erosion it's evident from the skulls that recovered from Indus valley...
@@haragopal1 hahaha this is not 90s man.Ppl who lived in Indus and Keezhadi are tamils.It is proved by genetics too.An 5000 yr old skeleton of indus area didnt match with aryans but with "The Irular" grp of tamilnaadu.The symbols,scripts all were same in both indus and keezhadi.It is proved by both archeologically and genetically,And aryans came 3400yrs ago as the genetics say sudden changes happened 3400yrs ago in north india i mean sudden genetic mixures ,The foreign gene got mixed up with the indigenous ppl of india Which is "R1A1" .this gene is the aryan gene which connects brahmins of india and jews .Brahmins are the Jews who came from khazar and I forgot the other place name.And the dam of indus was broken by The aryans who gave trouble which destroyed the indus civilization.The period of the aryan invasion and indusvalley destruction is the same .They (ppl of indus)moved to tamilnadu and developed the Keezhadi i mean Vaigai valley civilization with the symbols which exactly links with indus scripts and later brahmi(tamil brahmi) scripts which evolved from it.Ppl who didnt migrate to south got mixed up with aryans(today's northies) and they later improved brahmi scripts(U know tamil brahmi is 300yrs earlier to Ashoka brahmi)All these were proven facts by historians but still the aryans of north indians(brahmins) are not rdy to accept.U can search these things in internet . Research,learn.
@@Quizooh give me evidence that says IVC is destroyed by force not by climate change.... British said IVC is destroyed by aryans as they are beaty and developed race.... But it's proved wrong
@@Quizooh Brahmins and Dalits are same Read the Ambedkar research.... Brahmins are all over India....... Does Brahmins in Andhra Pradesh don't have same dna as Dalits in Andhra Pradesh.... Lol 😆😆😆😆😆😆 Read Ambedkar research on """who were Sudras""'' He concluded it Brahmins are Aryans so are Dalits.... If Brahmins are not Aryans so do the Dalits....
@@yoloswag1357 What about the Boros, Koches,Ahoms, Karbis, Dimasa, Chutiya, Moran, Motok, Singpho, Khampti, Rabha, Saraniya, Totla, Modahi, Shyam, Turung, Phakial, Deory, Barmans, Reangs, Kukis, Hmars, etc.who are indigenous people of Assam. Again, many Nagas, Garos, Khasis, Manipuries, and Mizos (besides residing in their own states )also reside in Assam. Kalitas,the other indigenous people of Assam are, of course, of Alpine origin. Assamese language is of Indo Aryan origin but with Tibeto Burman and Austric influences as exemplified by Dr. Bani Kanta's monumental work on the Assamese language. Race and language are two different things you must remember.
Did he say you are not an Indian you wad? Its obvious where your ancestors came from. And this theory has quite some evidence backing it to. It will explain the fair skin present in Indians. Dravidians are not fair skinned people. Obviously somewhere the genes mixed.
not quite right. all human species are migrated from south east africa. except if you are in south africa you are native not anywhere else. and dravidian is locality not race.
@@chirucapoeira5191 that we all came from South Africa very, very, very blurry estimations and nothing else. More importantly, if your people have been in a land for millennia as a majority, they are native.
@@iltoni6895 it is true that we all came from africa and genetics are the proof. if there is not enough evidence to disprove a theory of science then the theory is treated as fact unless future tech contradicts previous ones. and no, people who live for millenia will not become the natives of the land in scientific context. if the land was barren and people migrated there, they may become native not the after comers. if we go to mars and reside for milleniums then we are natives but if the mars had its own species and we replace them or mingle with them, no matter how long but we would still be an alien to the land in science. fyi: south asia had other species of neanderthals before hence all indians are migrants of various timeline.
Infognostica I think it would have been better for you to mention that the Aryans also invaded Europe & if I remember correctly wiped out the Matriarchal culture of the natives there. When people mention Aryan invasion it always refers to India & not Europe or Iran. This is where you went wrong.
Where is the evidence of the matriarchal culture? Because they worshipped a goddess, Mother Earth? Were women dominant in their society? What is the evidence of this?
That's the real truth that's why Aryans so called upper caste so much hate for Native Indians so called Lower caste because people of the same country can't have that kind of hate for their own citizens ...
Gadhe Arya means noble and Vedic was a period on whole world Bharatvarsh means entire world so it was common to marry the people far away Indians have both caucasin ,australsoid ,mongoloid and African gene And Aryans live in tribe in uttar Vedic period they start living in cities
@@blyat5352 their is no Dravidian gene , Dravidian is language that less similar to indo european Language , however similar to pre european Language like Hungarian , Finnish or uralic language
Haha!! Similar to Aryan Invasion is the Zimbabwe history. When British found an old civilization there... They said it was made by our old white ancestors who came many thousand years back, before us. The point they try to make is... Anything of significance has to be by them or their ancestors. This is how they put supremacy in their work
Amazing how defensive people can get when hearing facts they don't like. We Nth Indian's are descended from the Aryan's as well as the Dravidian's. GET OVER IT
Well, then we South indians aka so-called Dravidians are different than you. The real owner's of this land. The real owners of indian culture and traditions
@@gauthamkshatriya2953 You might want to listen again. The video states genetically the Dravidians dont exist solo. The combination of both genetics is the resulting present population. The culture traditions and contributions to humanity are wholly yours. The world is better for it!
@@augustusmcgovern6084 Well i can confirm you we south indians are more sanathani hindus then north indian so called aryans lol. Even we are rig vedis also we south indians are the one who can chant samskritha properly. North Indians are nomadics and persion blooded not real hindus or sanathanis. Real Hindus live in south india. Also we are the one's who restored sanathana dharma (Shankaracharya)
@@gauthamkshatriya2953 My point is the nth Indian's become defensive when they learn that they are descended from Aryan settlers in Nth India when it is fact. But it is also nonsense to suggest that Nth Indians are exclusively and ethnically 'Aryan'. There has clearly been a mixing of Dravidian and Aryan across Nth and Sth India. To suggest that Sth Indian's are ethnically / purely Dravidian is also nonsensical. This shouldn't be a competition. If our ancestors came into the subcontinent 1000s of years ago, to suggest that North Indians are not real Indian's makes you as stupid as the North Indian's complaining about being called Aryan. We are all mixed and our ancestors have been here for 1000s of years. Both Nth AND Sth Indian's need to GET OVER IT.
Dravidian is a racist term giving by English man to you which means uncivilized even the south kings didn't call themselves Dravidian you looks like a Propogandist
I don’t know what to say the man who give aryan invasion theory he say the nomadic people invade the most advanced civilisation of that time I can only laugh on him 😂😂😂
Your categories of Feminine and Masculine regarding Dravidian culture and people is completely false, perversely reductive and myopic. The mere fact that you chose those lenses to describe an entire people is evident that you have no clue what you are talking about and in no way understand Dravidian Culture nor should be considered an expert in this field no matter how many youtube links you have.
It's not popular nor politically correct in the standards of people of today. But it is accurate. The mechanism of nature is always in the opposites (nothing - something, day - night, good - bad, masculine - femenine). I guess it's diffcult to understand because of our culture but it makes sense...
@lord i dont understand what you are trying to say brother , all i wanted to say is that our female ancestors in hinduism are being prayed to as gods atleast in case of tamilnadu
Haha!! Similar to Aryan Invasion is the Zimbabwe history. When British found an old civilization there... They said it was made by our old white ancestors who came many thousand years back, before us. The point they try to make is... Anything of significance has to be by them or their ancestors. This is how they put supremacy in their work
Why Indians are agitating, going woooo, waaa ? Something fishy. If I come to know some facts about my country, I would look into it. I wouldn’t go mad. There must be some truth here which India not able to digest .
I am an Indian and I agreed this video , some one blindly opposes this theory because of some Political reason they try to hide The fact that they also come from Outside of India
Brahmins were medival war slaves of pagan origin doing menial jobs for their Master's & were transported to bharat (Afghanistan + tibet + bangladesh +pakistan+ srilanka) by the ruling brave tribes hailing from syria, iran, iraq and middle east. This is true I am a hussaini brahmin.
You can deny all you want but you can't beat Genetic technology....... The assimilation did happen, but whether or not it happened peacefully is up for debate......
@@strikerron2252 is it necessary to everyone to have blue eyes it's just a pigment that is responsible for the blue eyes then what about the hazel color and many more different color of the eyes
This video is not quite detailed on either the history or the genetics to really let people understand what went on back then, anyway. He probably doesn't even know the caste-system was already in place when the Early Iranians/Mixed Sintashta came in.
@@nusharfishcutting5306 yeah thats what ambedkar told These idiot irani desent aryans captured our lands😢 We dravidians should unite atleast now😢 they are making us to hate each other😢
Their is no proof of that , also archeologists found cow fat in pottery of indus which has definitely came from use of ghee,milk or curd , their was animal fat found in diet of indus not animal meat , milk ,ghee all have heavy cow fat in it
Some people here are offended because he called dravidians more feminine. You get offended if you think the masculine is better than the feminine. The other thing is that dravidians were more peaceful, egalitarian and had next to no weaponry. Majority of population had access to running water, bath which too many people today lack. They are the best example of a matriarchy. The theory about them being dominated by aryans is not plausible since they being so succesful and caring would more likely have welcomed them with open arms and intermingle with them which is supported by the genetic and historical facts. The third thing that this video misses is that dravidians were introverted while aryans were extremely extroverted. Look at the difference, aryans explored the outer world while dravidians gifted us with yoga and meditation which is the exploration of the inner world. Too think one is better than the other is both stupid and ignorant of the facts.
We are not offended because he called us feminine. We are offended because he called aryans masculine. You do know that rig veda has women composers too right? And it has female warriors too. As a south indian we are proud of being a matriarchal society, but thats not the issue here. The issue is the assumption of aryans being central asian people.
@@chirucapoeira5191 bruh both sides have both qualities but dravidians mostly preferred peace but that doesn't mean dravidians are feminine or some shit and also why are you being offended because he called them masculine there is nothing with it if masculinity doesn't exist then we wouldn't have existed also dravidians found martial art kalaripayattu
@@justarandomperson2957 where do you get these fantasies from? dravidians are literally the one and only group who somewhat waged war with outsiders. from odeya to cholas. they built cities like singapore through conquest and established their puppet kingdom as far as cambodia. unlike the northerners who didnt even step out of afghanistan when they had 100x the army of persians during mauryan era. and you are talking rubbish and out of context. you dont even understand what we are saying.
We are dravidians. We still keep our identity by loving languages and cultures, we worshipping nature's god's than man made religious gods and main thing is that we are not like or ready to war against any race. Our thoughts are very soft and still south india want to become most important place of the world through education and culture only, not through war, racism...
Vanakkam Thala I am a Malayali. We Are Dravidars by Marabu Inam and Malayali, Tamilar , Thelugu and Kannada by Dasaiya Inams . I Regularly Watch Adharmam Channel. I got This Information from That Channel only. The People of Kerala , Tamil Nadu , Karnataka and Andra Looks same While The North Indians Looks Different 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊.
I'm an Arya-Dravidian a Brahmin by ancestory but a proudly Indian. Whether our DNA's can differentiate but we both are together for the greater good of the Bharatvarsha. We both share same Dharma and have same motive to widespread it. Veer Bhogya Vasundhara
@@shubhankardasgupta4777 see , an Irish man and greek man has too many genetic difference yet they still come under Indo European family , scholars ever say invasion to native European by indo European so why india?
@@greaterbharat4175 they do say its invasion in europe. but they call south indians the indegenous people unlike in europe where they dont differentiate any. and the chitrakuta tribe of karnataka and ancient steppe pastorolist of yamnaya have more genetic relation than modern ukrainians themselves. highest R1A1 composition is in india, that too south indian scheduled caste.
@@chusmanjutt7644 mullah? 😂 aryan? Aryan worship Indra Agni surya rudra Brahma Varuna Mithra like gods and They worship rivers nature worshipers. Allah is non-aryans cult
skin colours based on geography, food etc. I have seen many Kerala,karantaka ppl are very fair and look like north indians where as ppl from tamilnadu and Ap are little darker in colour. Ppl in North India also mix of darker and light skin.we all are same.This colour discrimination created by Britishers to divide india and also the Aryan- Dravidian concept. I was laughing on one comment where one person was telling Shiva is north indian God😂😂 because he stays in himalaya.some stupid ppl divide gods also into north and south categories.
Haha!! Similar to Aryan Invasion is the Zimbabwe history. When British found an old civilization there... They said it was made by our old white ancestors who came many thousand years back, before us. The point they try to make is... Anything of significance has to be by them or their ancestors. This is how they put supremacy in their work
@@pulz1191 This is not the same! There are linguistic proof of the Aryan invasions. Explain why multiple word in Sanskrit are also in Latvian and Lithuanian thousands of years later?
What astonishes me is that the confidence at which these foreign content creaters make a concluding work of such a topic no one have ever been sure of. It has been proved that this theory is a nothing but bs Pr0pAgaNda.
Imagine ignoring the fact that Sanskrit in a Proto Indo European languge. *Introduced* into India as well as the swastika. marxist Indians denying their own history. ua-cam.com/video/4SRSWTkjfiQ/v-deo.html
@Khushal Mithra Nice try what? Don't get triggered. Don't want your money. You want proof watch the video I linked if you want to learn real non anti white cultural marxist history. Use common sense. I thought Indians were smart yet they're turning into the new we waz k.
Sir, your theory of the aryan invension /migration is basiclly just base on mere speculation , without any hardcore evidence . The DNA of Indians from South is very much similar to indians from north as compare to the larger part of europe, even the rakhigarhi specimen also shows no signs of AIT , Infact it supports the theory of migration from india to iran and then to europe. Both the language Sanskrit and vedas are originated in india and then migrated to europe.
Out of India theory is just a tool for religio-nationalistic politics. No solid evidence. Vague interpretations. And all people in India are the descendants of migrants. Homo Sapiens were originated in Africa, not in India. LoL
So you are saying some south Indians are pitch black and their features are not skinny because of south Indian sun that hit the skin of white north Indians who moved to south India. No way. South Indians were a mixture of Aryans and hunter gatherers who were the original African migrants. They occupied the land and Aryans invaded them and the hunter gatherers in Sri Lanka.
@@milochamp1586 soutg indians are not Africans but original indians like chattisgarh etc. South indians are majority fair in kerala and karnataka because of arab and jew mix
@@Mj-in5uj who is uneducated????? Recent studies , evidence ,papers proved that Aryan invasion was happened.... researchers from across the world accepted this , only northern indians still ignoring this fact like u ,, uneducated!!
What a senseless rant! Just take some exotic sounding words - yin, yang - mix it up with Aryan, Dravidian and there - a new esoteric gem is born. Infognostica gets the crown of mystic mumbo-jumbo.
Well, this debate is endless! I agree that humans have been migrating all over the earth. And we should be aiming for inclusiveness rather than divisiveness. I'm specifically against the highly politicised Aryan invasion/migration theory because there is substantial material refuting it. timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aryan-Dravidian-divide-a-myth-Study/articleshow/5053274.cms swarajyamag.com/culture/so-what-happened-to-the-unambiguous-genetic-evidence-of-aryan-migration swarajyamag.com/ideas/genetics-and-aryan-migration-setting-the-record-straight-once-again swarajyamag.com/culture/aryans-and-dravidians-an-invention-of-racist-nineteenth-century-scholars www.vedanet.com/the-aryan-dravidian-divide-is-a-political-myth/ varnam.nationalinterest.in/2009/09/the-aryan-dravidian-divide-myth/
Dimasa kachchari are the origin of ancient greater India, Aryan/arjya means they are coming from that place and outsider gypsy, hring khring bring swaha swami agni saraswati Dwarika hastinapur harappa mohenjudaro this words are belongs from Dimasa kachchari language....
@balaji krishnamurty Hahahhah spot on. I'd say this makes no sense but sounds like a credible authority with all those big wordy words. Except experts don't usually spout random shit like "the principles in our DNA".. because what the fuck does that mean. Being condescending while telling an entire culture to accept a narrative jammed down their throats by former oppressors is clearly going to be divisive. So the issue has moved on from who's 'right' now, it's about him being a dick with godawful debate/comprehension skills. I'm Eurasian btw, no horse in this race, but clumsily trying to redefine white supremacism as enlightenment is clearly not so fucking esoteric.
As biologist Because, people are believing in truth...Aryan Invasion theory is true * Archaeologically, there is no connection between Indus civilization and Vedic practices. There are evidences of arrival of Nomadic Aryans to India only from 1800 to 1500 BC. * Harappan people had their own pictograph language that is closely connected with Dravidian languages. Aryans Sanskrit doesn't evolved as a script until Panini write Sanskrit grammar during 4th century BC. * Aryans had a deep connection and affairs to do with horses. India is not a native of horses and no way connected with the practice of horse raiding and sacrifice * Very importantly, sanskrit doesn't have any worlds to mention the farm equipment's. There is no reference of agriculture practices during vedic period by vedic people, that confirms they are nomads hailed from central Asia or any other location in the world. * Sangam literature written in Tamil proves the absence of Vedic practices, Vedic sacrifices, Varunashirama, sati, unfamiliarity with horses in Dravidian areas.. * Aryan sanskrit has deep root with European languages and no way connected with Dravidian languages. Rig vedha is nothing but the modified form of Avesta. The battle of ten kings mentioned in the Rig vedha clearly denotes the Aryan Invasion. * Puranas on the other side proving Aryan hostilities with Dravidians. If you have a microscopic look at Puranas, Aryans (Rama, Vamana, Narasimma, Matsya, vishnu) were always targeting Dravidian kings like Ravana, Mahabali, Hiranya, Hiranyakshan, Mahisha, Naraga and depicted them as demon kings. * Puranas are no way considered as an evidence. If we consider their essence as as evidence, destruction of Dravidian kings and celebrating their defeat as festivals until modern time proves the Aryan invasion theory. * There are people claiming that Aryan invasion theory was proposed by British to divide the Indians. Mortimer wheeler proposed the Aryan invasion theory during 1953. By proposing Aryan invasion theory after independence, how can British divide and rule? There are anti elements trying to create another Purana by continuously saying Aryan invasion theory is wrong. But modern technology dont allow them to do so..
@@eldergod4817 humans originated from Africa is also fake? BS, does it even matter today when all aryans and dravidians are mixed. And explain why caste system exist in India since ancient times? It surely have something to with Aryan invasion. But in the end it doesn't matter, all are Indians including mongloid people from East.
@@lightr2187 caste system is not part of Hinduism it's a Portuguese system you idiot. The word caste itself is Portuguese, the Varna system is not caste system.
Its been proven that there were migrations of several groups of people in and out of India. Presently all northern and southern Indians are mix of ANI(aryan+ASI) and ASI(Iranian+Hunter gatherers) with admixture level differing according to individual, geographical location, caste etc. No one is pure ARYAN or DRAVIDIAN. Some indians don't want to understand this and fight with each other claiming they are aryan or dravidian. Secondly, according to recent archaeological studies it is found out that aryans didn't invade india but rather migrated to india and settled here. Sanskrit was formed after they assimilated to india it is not a foreign thing. Horses and chariots and warrior clans were already in India before aryans, it is recently discovered in sinauli excavations. Also these people migrated from india to other places.
@farus killer The base ancestry of all south asians is the indus valley ancestry. All southern and northern indians have ANI and ASI ancestry with different admixture level. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_archaeogenetics_of_South_Asia Even the paniya tribe who has the least ANI ancestry (according to a recent ancestry study) has 17 % ANI ancestry. Indians on average have 5-30% ANI ancestry and 40 to 70 % indus valley ancestry. When we go from north west to east and south of india, indigenous hunter gatherer ancestry increases on average, thats probably why we can see some phenotypical differences. Again southern and northern indians live in different zones, so darkness of skin is also justified as we go south. The women in the video is a rare case. We don't know her genetics details. She probably has some gene mutation. Nobody in india is pure ARYAN or DRAVIAN. All have mixed ancestry.
@farus killer what are you even talking about? What i meant was northern and southern indians are not different race but some people consider indians as different race(north indian and south indian), which is stupidity.Learn something dude.
ஒன்றே குலம் ஒருவனே தேவன் யாதும் ஊரே! பேதைமை அற்ற வாழ்வே பெருமைக்கு உரியது. இட்டார் பெரியார் இடாதார் இழிகுலத்தார். One is the clan One is God Anything? Life without sin To be proud of. Itar Periyar Itadhar is a tiger.
@@onduty7499 according to "lucette G r1a" research Indian variant of r1a ( oldest sampledate 15,500 years) in india this gene research happened in 2015 ( but mostly still west promote older 2007 research with no oldest sample from India)
What a load of crap, there is no proof that the migration was war like and just for your information chariots came a hell of a lot later and crafted iron swords
@Naveen Yadav hope you know about India's National Anthem.Grow up child only North India has this paranoid.And they call Mughal as Invanders. Hypocrite
@@ncxdf1277 Have you ever seen people of Hindi belt?Most of them look similar to average south Indian.This Aryan-dravidian thing is not good for India.Are you a tamilian?
@@gouthamkrishnan6718 Yeah those North Indians are obviously more Indian looking n has more native DNA. I was talking about Punjabis/kashmiris/northwest Indians that are actually mixed with central Asians/afghans. They look more Eurocentric
I'm bengali islander only in our island sandwip have matta rice which I found after moving in usa after 7 yrs living coming across a mallayi found out they also eat our rice matta I'm surprised
@t s Muthuraman where is that genetic study bro ur still in 2019 Aryan invasion theory brought by West with no prove cause they wanted to convert southern indians to Christian Divide and rule 😂😂
@t s Muthuraman The evidence u gave is not called evidence it's just nonesense Just think if aryan invasion happened than why there is no dead bodies found of that great war.
@t s Muthuraman but u can see the soil where mahabharat happen is red and historians already found the Dwarka nagri But for AIT there is no base it's baseless theory to divide india and rule to convert South indians
@t s Muthuraman bro it's up to you now you can consider ur father was your neighbor without dna test Or u can consider ur father was aryan with no evidence
@@user_uuwi no , looks like you never read history, Aryan does not live a tribal life( they had no reason for isolation) they made empire,ruled , roamed all over India ,and if you talking pure blood no human in entire World has pure blood nobody can have pure blood ( if it they mostly products of nuclear family or incest )
The origin of r1a is still not established. And here's the video creator already ready with his precise description of bronze age aryan migration. Different halogroups ofcourse mixed, it's just that where the halogroup "aryan" r1a1 gene originated is still nowhere near established.
It originated from the now Sub Saharan desert which was once a massive lush green forest with the largest lakes and rivers. With Atlantis being the capital, but since the global catastrophe 10000 years ago which wiped out that civilisation, forced the massive Aryan group to migrate eastward and break down into several groups and travel to different parts of the world. Indian subcontinent being one of them.
@@declanharp8644 WHats wrong pussi. There is actual empirical evidence supporting that. Along with records kept by ancient Greek writers and historians.
@@skylinelover9276this doesn't establish bronze age aryan migration theory. Indo-iranic split perhaps happened around 3500 BC. If that's the case the central asian route for indo-aryan is wrong and iranic route is more plausible making the aryan migration earlier than bronze age, and perhaps also part of indus valley civilization. I am not claiming it's indo europeans are indian origin, but that doesn't make bronze age migration automatically true. Too much politics in academia. Read this a-genetics.blogspot.com/2023/07/hybrid-model.html
This is completely wrong I have been studying on this subject for a long time Arya means the higher purity in sanskirt and the latest excavation of behalki up state of India have a striking point that Aryan invasion is completely wrong and I have so many proofs regarding to this Even the archeological and biological studies backs my statement
Proud Dravidian as we are the real owner of Indus Valley civilisation and indian subcontinent🔥. Aryans invaded indus and invented caste system and spreaded their agni vedic religion and renamed as hindu because old Dravidians had civilised lifestyle near indu river. Aryans then theft all cultures and literatures written in old tamil language as their own and mixed varnas and caste in it in which they can dominate as upper caste. Old Aryans are cruel minded and spreaded their false theories as they speak to fire, water, land. Old Dravidians were believed to be nature and ancestral worshipers. Now everywhere aryan descendents doing their modern discrimination to Dravidian community. We will fight for our rights until we die. We are not one ,we made to be one. So don't impose ur nationality and hindi on us. We are unique and we have our own equality culture. Proud Dravidian. Proud South Indian.🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💪💪💪💪💪💪
Too much pride is making you to lose control of your cerebrum. Come out of your delusion and accept the truth that these are all myth which were debunked already.
you are succesfully brainwashed kid. We Indians are all descendents of same people....The Aryan Invasion is a myth and Out of India Theory is proved to be right man
Fun facts is both sanskrit and Tamil formed and shaped and existing in India. Up to this day we can say tamil is the oldest and practicing language and sanskrit also old( not proven oldest) and still exists . And both language created and influenced many languages like my mother language malayalam ( which is a mix of both). We know for sure south Indians are also pioneers in sanskrit in that time . I don't know how but division based on language dates long before British. It was just like our kingdoms trying to prove which is better, but fun literally it helped to create most amazing scriptures in both languages and an unneccessary division . But unlike any other ancient language it STILL EXISTING ❤ . Please try understand and don't overstate. Just like we are saying I am not above or below you , I'm equal as you (which is namaste)
Indians have more no. Of race than population of some European countries, you quoted 2 , what about the others, we all are indians dont try to divide us
india is not homogeneous society. Indians are casteist and racist at the core of there hearts. they hate eachother. They've already divided themselves. There religion allow such division and hate. truth hearts but you have to accept it.
@kaustabh mate the dna evidence actually disproves that. yes there were migration. but rakhigadhi dna is the largest harappan site with no foreign dna[except iranian from 11000yrs ago] with advanced weapons and horse chariots. you may have white dna but that doesnt make you aryan coz last 1000yrs we had invaders from turkey, mongol and british for gods sake. then how does your dna is linked to ancient vedic people?
@@chirucapoeira5191 man that's what I am saying but those propagandic asshole don't understand , vedic civilization was actually Indus civilization , brahmin statue founded in Indus ( priest king) ajectly match with how brahmin sit and mediate ( Indus priest king mediating trataka ) , also we found chaiorts without any foreign involvement in Indus site swatika symbol, woman with wrists banglas and sindhur , fire altars ( Vedic Ritual)
@@greaterbharat4175 not exactly correct. vedic civilisation predates harappan civilisation. vedic people are from gangetic plain with hymns and chants of sanskrit. while harappan people were urban and composed yoga. as vedic people spread from ganga to sindhu they all combined each others culture including idol worship or temple building from south. fact: harappan were vedic people but cant confirm they spoke sanskrit[but i believe] yes. misconception: harappans also the composer of rig veda. vedic people and harappan people are like fingers and hinduism/dharma is a fist. we cant tell if harappans did speak sanskrit or not yet.but we can have no doubt that gangetic people were the native sanskrit speakers. lol. dont worry. no one subscribe to aryan theory anymore except those who are already invested in those studies. have you seen any young western scholars writing book about this? only indian left are trying this coz of their globalist agenda. in matter of a decade there will be no aryan theory. coz niraj rai[who believed aryan theory at first] says he has unpublished reports which would become a nail in the coffin. once he publishes that its all over. just like rakhigarhi his paper will bring a huge slap to indian wanna be whites.
@@chirucapoeira5191 yes , but for sure vedic= Indian civilization , we found the yantra tradition being oldest known tradition in India (25000bce -11000bce by archeological evidence) their is call yagna ritual is raplica of yantra ( not raplica but yantra to impress Vedic diety )
@@chirucapoeira5191 yantra have origin in vedic tradition even found in Russia (2000bce arkaim = ark ( konark) =Surya yantra styles settlement in Russia) which belong to Indo Europeans culture , right now yantra in India is not in temple form but as we still make big yantra rangoli and worshipped specific diety
@Archana Kulkarni , true! It's a Sanskrit word. But our body stock [Racial type is South Indian]. You have NO right to ethnic cleanse our South Indian race. You should accept it, because we exist!😅 Dravida is a modified Sanskrit word "Trivid" (indicates India's peninsula, Tri=three, vid=directions. It means, Water/Ocean surrounded land. Gradually the same word became "Thravida", and finally Dravida. After some time, Aryans started using the same word to call South Indian native people, before it was for the South Indian land or territory. [Source: Ancient Sanskrit texts composed by Brahmin scholars] [Brahmins, one of the important Aryan subgroup]. *ORIGINALLY* [👇] >>Aryans: Racial Description- European skin complexion, Tall/Lean, Pointed Nose, Thin Lips. Religion : Vedic Religion Social Classification: Brahmin, Ksatriya, Vysya, Sudra. Food Habits: Brahmins and majority of the Vysyas are vegetarians, Ksatriyas and Sudras are non-vegetarians. Beef haters! Cow (female cattle) is Godly figure. >> Dravidas: Racial Description- Native or Early Indian Settlers, Short/Heavy, Broad Nose, Thick Lips. Religion : Ethnic Beliefs Social Classification: Mainly Tamila, Kannadiga, Telugu, Malayali and other small Tribes Food Habits: Majority are non-vegetarians, Some are vegetarians. Neutral stand on Beef! Cow was not a Godly figure, its male counterpart Ox to some extent worshipable! In South Indian Temples we can see Bulls' statues! *OVER THE TIME* Because of Aryans' more population and dominating nature, their socio-cultural and religious elements entered South Indian territory and people! Where as Aryans didn't receive any of the South Indians socio-cultural or religious elements. ALSO, Because of 4000-4500 years of interaction between Aryans and Dravidians, through social and biological mingling like marriages [mainly among King/Rulers, South Indian rulers married Aryan girls/ladies]. Their next generations started showing Aryan features as well in South India! Also, South Indian kings invitations to Aryan priests/scholars, attracted them for new opportunities in South India. Some of these priests/scholars married South Indian girls, once again this resulted in showing Aryan features in South India. NOW [2020] in INDIA: Through out India we can find Aryan racial features. Currently Indian population is, Aryans racial features: 45-50% population. Dravidian racial features: 18-20% population. Aryan-Dravidian mixed features: ~20% population. Mangoloids features:~1% population. Various combinations of main groups: 19-20% population.
@Archana Kulkarni Ever heard of Kumari Kandam? From where people migrated to Mesopotamia then Egypt. Aryans too were Dravidians, it's just about the migration.
Absolutely wrong theory and idea, Aryans were nothing to Influence Great Indus spiritual philosophyical social and most stuctured and Well organised Indus civilisation. In every region of world there is a mix-up of different raises or people, so nothing seems to be great for aryans than other mugal percian arabic etc
Kamlesh Yadav U should care , Aryan invasion theory is false and baseless. Church propaganda is huge , they want to convert a lie into truth. As historian proved this theory as baseless. So Christens missionaries using UA-cam for their propaganda.
Arians are the main reason for losing your identity. And adding the Second name YADAV with your name. We Tamil Nadu people will not have that because of many leaders like Periyar and we also can save oru language Tamil where else other parts of the nation slowly loosing their identities and following hindi and sanskrit
Vishal Maraj. Rakighari is recognised as the largest indus civilisation site, bigger then even Mohenjodaro by about 50 hectres. What are u trying to say exactly?
Puranānūru 335, Poet: Māngudi Kizhār, and there are no groups other than these four - thudi drummers, pānars, parai drummers and Kadampans. There are no gods, other than the memorial stones of heroes who blocked enemies, killed their elephants with lifted, bright tusks and got killed, to be worshiped with rice showerings!
Aryans probably moved down from Northern Central Asia or Russia. Where they split and some went to Europe and some came in Indian subcontinent. Assuming Aryans moved from Central Asia is a very vague claim made by historians. Its based on later interactions with Central Asian cultures. But originally even the asurs might just be Aryans too but grew as enemies.
Unlucky for those who went to India. They got assimilated and their descendants now living in the slums of India, when they could have been born in Europe instead, if their Aryan ancestors never bothered with India. LOOL
The Buddha had blue eyes and was Aryan. Iran translates to the land of the Aryans. Aryan has a noble context in India... Lol dravidians are in straight up denial. Even the goddess Danu who had blue skin has similar representations to God's in Europe who also had blue skin. The Tuatha De Danaan were said to have worshiped Danu... The Celtic God of fertility, oh what's that Hinduism has a fertility goddess named Danu... Well well well isn't that just a coincidence.....
@kseykshoykshaksat - No one today is Pure Aryan or Pure Dravidian. Every Indian is both Aryan and Dravidian to various degrees. I don't think I deny anything you've said. There's a reason why North Indian is called Indo-Aryan and not just Aryan. And why does it matter to you? So what if 80% Indians are non Brahmin origin (of course, why would there be any civilization with majority population descent from Preist/Scholar lineage? Seems that's how it should be). Calling one an Arya both in North and South India is very honorable thing (But that is viewed very old fashioned and nobody will even get you if you did.) If you're of Noble character and a follower of Noble values you're called an Arya. Aryan are those ancient people migrated to Iran and India bringing with them the term and concept. Indo-Aryans are the consequence of mixing of Aryans and other primals of India. Dravidian are also a consequence of mixing of Iranian agriculturists and Hunter Gatherers. If you're are of Noble character you'll be called an Arya too but not Aryan academically. Where's after Vedic Period all Indians mixed to various degrees. PIE shouldn't be called Aryan, Indo-Iranian of Southern PIE called their tribes Aryan not others.
Hello guys. Firstly, the terms masculine and feminine are by no means trying to insult one or the other. One culture was adept at war, while the other was more adept at spiritual practice - it's not that one is better than the other. The point is everyone is a mix, which means everyone can embody the qualities of both.
Please also watch the clarification video which is next in line (Part 3)
PS. There is a misconception that the Aryans are 'European' - they were NOT, they were from the Eurasian Steppe, near the Caucasus mountains (hence the word CAUCASIAN). This is not a European invasion of any sort. They are far more ancient than any concept of "Europe".
Are you getting this info from sadhguru because he is totally wrong about aryan - dravidian history.... check out Rajiv Malhotra on youtube for that..
For eg... Sadhguru states that
"In South India, they don’t ascribe to the Vedas." is nonsense.
Shankaracharya (Kerala), Ramanuja (Tamil Nadu) & Madhavacharya
(Karnataka), who wrote Bhashyas for Brahmasutras are from South India.
Pandyas & Cheras participated in the Mahabharata war! There are
hundreds of Vedic shakas in South India. There are 2 cosmologies:
Chandramana & Souramana and both are practiced in south. Vedic Jyotisha
is practised in a major way and is the mainstream astrology.
So for sadhguru to say that
South India or dravidian culture was not part of Vedic culture is a false statement.
Aryan-Dravidian theory is completely bogus. There is
no scientific evidence for it ...again search for rajiv malhotra on youtube....
Sadhguru is good as an enlightened master in teaching yoga but not so much in history...
This video says that the "indigenous" People considered Earth as
their mother not the Supposed "Aryans" is completely Baseless.
"Mata Bhoomi: putro aham prithvya" (Atharva veda (12.1.12) (meaning: Earth is the Mother and I am her son) is enshrined in the Vedas and no where in the Vedas its said that GOD is somewhere in the SKY on the contrary
Vedas firmly establish that GOD is present every where as the all pervading consciousness "Sarvam khalvidam brahma"..
Infognostica thankyou for your efforts. I understand you mean no harm or foul play in any sense. But it turns out there is lot to be uncovered on this topic. All we can do is try our best to search for more information and keep the discussions going...:)
Shiv-Shakti
I'm not getting it from Sadhguru guys, there is strong evidence that it happened, hapolotypes show inward migration c.4000 years ago. This is NOT about western imperialism, as the aryans were NOT Europeans - they were just related to them. Everyone is now a mix.
Infognostica, After uploading videos , you do care for the comments , n come back to explain. Good attitude bro 👍👍
I came here by searching my own name up
Aryan
Thakur yes my name is aryan
Is this movie accurate? I trust your opinion
😂😂😂
@@Nojell its the british theory, infact the opposite of this happened according to some historical
I came with 50% knowledge to this video and I am left with 0% knowledge after this video.
it simply means gained nothing .what u think u originated from the white men.
@King George that's fake news by British to dhravids and Aryan are originated in india & all have same treditions and life style all are spiritual and not warmongers like west & middle east.... We are descendants of Aryan and dravids we are Indians then mongals & British spoiled every thing distroyed history...
@@sonbon2879 thats fake propeganda by British...
@@sonbon2879 we all originated from Africans lol.
@@maruthimaruthi3720 But I will we must considers the Muslims as much Indians as us who have been living and dying here since generations. Who don't have anymore connections with other nations.
Wheather I am aryan or dravidian, I don't know but one thing I know that I am Indian and love my country people.
Then dont study history in your school
@@karthiksh5120 aryan theory proven wrong by the rakhagiri village DNA finding and kheeladi archeological stuff
@@andyparackal7471 there are no dravidan and aryan and it is proven many times
new DNA findians from rakhagiri and stuff from keeladi site back this statement
@@punalmanalan2346 there are dravidians and aryan commononly known as ancestral north indian and ancestral south indian, in the study of genetics.
Vicky u can actually be both and can embrace both identities. U dont need to diswon ur racial identity to prove ur patriotism
Actually the Aryans are the white feminine and the Dravidians are the darker masculine.
Skin colour doesn't define masculinity or femininity.
@@king_dmj5280 Testosterone has direct effects on skin melanin production and retention.
how were the dravidians masculine, if their gods were all women, and they never developed proper weaponry? how were the aryans feminine if they conquered the dravidians, due to superior technology and physical characteristics?
now here's something for you to sit with; when the pastoralist, raw milk drinking, curd-eating aryan warriors with blue eyes and golden hair matched with golden skin from a lifetime of basking in the sun of the eurasian steppe, rolled in on chariots and found a matriarchal society of shorter and swarthier people living off of grains and worshipping sculptures of obese women, and subsequently conquered these people, who were the "masculine" ones and who were the "feminine" ones?
So this means I can be both a badass and an innocent guy at the same time...😎😎😎😊😊😊
@@bobabearwastaken7896 most probably those two will be americans who are always thinking about color of skin😂😂🤣🤣
ABABIALIL IT DONT MATTER WHAT COLOR HIS FACE IS YOU GUYS!! HE SHOULD NOT BE RACIST OMGGGG
🤔🤔🤔I didn't know that my one comment is making some of you guys fight each other until now...🤣🤣🤣
J r S 1994 lmaooo
@@estrellaneie1543 🤣🤣🤣
New theory- aryans came from mars
Oof I get this reference and cringed
Nop. in ages ago, immigrated to Indus valley of India. Hence Hindu religion, Hindi language.
@@krisea3807 yeah, we know, it's a joke
@@krisea3807 to know is to have proof, but with no proof you can't "know"
U are right bro..... It is based on leftist Islamist and communist to divide india and to rule. Same as britisher... This theory is unproved.
Dravidians were never pale people. They were dark skinned black people.
They are not black just brown tone.
@TamilArasan-rg6zl No they were black people, the rakshasa mentioned in Ramayana and Mahabharata were Dravidians, After intermixing of Aryans and Dravidians, brown skin tone came
@@TamilArasan-rg6zlNo. They were black. From African origin.
Dravidianz wuz blekz n sheeiii
@@rlmpproductions the original Dravidian (proto Dravidian) were Iranian farmers, but when they migrated to South India they intermix to the hunter gatherers Wich have dark skin and create the Dravidian language (not longer a proto-dravidian)
Many cultures one india.
ಜೈ ಭುವನೇಶ್ವರಿ
Jai hind! 🇮🇳 long live 🇮🇳India❤🥰
Brother it's not India
It's Bharatvarsh
ಜೈ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಜೈ ಭಾರತ ❤
India has nice history and diversity, I send you Love from Tavastia, Finland.
Haha!! Similar to Aryan Invasion is the Zimbabwe history. When British found an old civilization there... They said it was made by our old white ancestors who came many thousand years back, before us. The point they try to make is... Anything of significance has to be by them or their ancestors. This is how they put supremacy in their work
Dr. subramanyam swamy wants to know your location.
Lol
Liar samy?
Keshav I am not sure how you think?
www.thehindu.com/society/history-and-culture/theres-no-confusion-the-new-reports-clearly-confirm-arya-migration-into-india/article29409611.ece/amp/
@@TheAbletester still un didn't answer him about " how can u deny DNA"🤭Sorry but lies and liars always fucked by TECHNOLOGY 😆😆
@@TheAbletester what about krishna holding mountain on his pinky finger??
Proud dravidian
Proud hindu
Me too
@@kaustubhnigam7027 we never proud Hindu we proud our Tamil
@@rajaa7951 but you do write HINDU in the religion column you moron.
@@sumanrai8921 that was British laziness to name all non Islam, non Christian,non Jain,nonsikh as Hindu , we do not have same culture , tradition, beliefs, language as utterpradesh
one word, SINAULI
Proved this theory correct ?
@@matthewmartin2422 Sinauli is a new archeological site( the largest ever metropolitan burial site found) which debunked this theory. As the burial site is more than 4200 years old and has warrior class women (The first female warriors ever) and war chariots in the grounds which even pre-dates Mesopotamia (which was believed the first chariots till now)
@@Sai_2346 they were buried instead of cremated?
@@babla69420 I am a telugu Hindu and in my family dead people are buried.... I am sorry to break your bubble but Hinduism is not a religion but a belief system and way of living. You cannot confine it to a rule book like other faiths there 100000's sects of people who follow different customs for different reasons and the point is.. yes! People are buried after death in various places in india since the inception of time as we know it...
Edit: even saints who were buried still recieve prayers in india, example... my family devotes to raghavendra swamy in mantralayam a place where I have been many times since childhood. All the information is just Google away, it just takes an effort to listen and a mindset to understand...
@@Sai_2346 omg nigga tries to break bubble, well since we playing this game im a fair northie from a brahmin family, pretty sure came from southern Kazakhstan 4000 years ago, and lemme tell you indra agni and varun the major gods of vedic ideology are nowhere to be found among harappan gods, and worship of phallus wasn't very popular in vedic culture whereas there are a ton of evidence phallus was worshipped in harappa. The later hinduism was a result of mixing of then developing aryan and declining harappan cultures.
I don't know what do you bhakts are trying to achive by denying the aryan migration, like we're all literally migrants from africa what is the point of denying and twisting scientific researches to prove a single race of homogeneous indians with their own purely indigenous religion without any outside influence. K i gotta go now lal salam
Darvidians are real indians
@ಕಾಡು ಹಂದಿ yes i am not i am a proud sindhi
No.
Dravids aren't the real indians either.
Adivasis are the first people who arrived in India.
Aryans were organic to Indian peninsula & Himalayan ranges but shitty people still believe in aryan invasion theory in age of DNA science 😂 it's fkin hilarious
But u muslims aren't
@@hemishshah6666even first people came from South Africa, it is was Dravidians who settled in India first time, which is also called indus valley civilization
WHO R DRAVIDIANS? :
TELGU, TAMIL
KANNADA, MALYALAM
PPL R DRAVIDIANS 🤟😎
But what about those living in Pakistan, east /central India ?
@@zuxic8124 ACTUALLY... NORTH INDIAN PPL ARE MIGRATED FRM... IRAQ, IRAN, WEST AND EVEN FRM CENTRAL ASIA TO NORTH IÑDIA... IN MIDDLE/UPPER PALEOLITHIC AGE... PPL OF SOUTH IÑDIA... THEY STARTED THEIR OWN CULTURE FRM THERE ITSELF...
BY THE WAY... IÑDIA IS HUGE DIVERSED COUNTRY... BEING AN IÑDIA TOGETHER... WE'VE TO RESPECT... OUR HUGE DIVERSITY... N ALSO WE'VE TO FEEL PROUD FOR, LARGE DIVERSE, LARGEST DEMOCRACY IN D WORLD 🤟😎🚩🇮🇳♥️🔥
@dheeraj Vishwakarma
I meant what about those Dravidian ethnic groups living in Pakistan, east and central India? Don’t forget about them too.
@@zuxic8124 BEING A COMMON MAN... WT CAN I DO FOR THEM MAN🥺.. I'M NOT A LEADER TO BRING THEM BACK FRM THERE... U KNW... NARENDRA MODI.. IS REALLY A GRT LEADER... COZ OF
"CAA" HE'S BRINGING BACK HINDHU, BUDHA, JAIN, SIKHS OF IÑDIA FRM PAK, BANGLADESH ETC. ETC., I CAN DO NOTHING FOR THEM MAN... BT HE DOES... LET'S WISH HIM GRT .. THAT'S IT😊👐
False narrative... I'm Tamil myself ..I don't believe in this bullsh*t theory
I'm north indian and i believe in this theory. Its foolishness not to believe so.
Foool😂😂😂
I'm North Indian and I don't believe in it either
It's true and you aren't Tamil
3:36 ok thanos
Hammond, you idiot....
You won't get offended if you watch top gear
I'm one of them from iran land of aryans
iran means is land of aryans
@Khushal Singh no dude aryans came from top side of Asia and after that they traveled to all over the world
there is Aryan logos in iran and Greece and es near Caspian see
and in India too
@@armin3068 it's still a hypothesis
@@greaterbharat4175 dude as persian/kurd
and an Iranian we have still some of old world from aryans in our language
night =Nacht
nicht =nist
(zano) means knee to is one old aryans world and ............
and names to still use =Armin Arta Arya Aryan Artin Arses Arvin Artemis Arat Armando Aryana and....
@@armin3068 iranin are only languagestic indo European , zoroatrianism God is ahura Mazda ( asura) ,asura is assarians deity which they monothiestly worshipped , devtas are demons in zoroatrianism but all Indo Europeans call Their Gods as devta but not zoroatrians
@@armin3068 ashura/ ahura Mazda dipiction similar to Mesopotamic god ( anunakis with wings ) not to Indo Europeans dipiction / and about now iranin are Islamic
Oh God save my country. Let my fellow Indians realise that being mixed race is not a sin and no one cares indeed. and plz save us from the people with religion mask 😂😂😂
Herbal Shaman
Dont drag us in your sins.
Herbal Shaman
Who are you then?
Herbal Shaman
American?
I am a Malaysian Indian and I agree with you. My cousin's husband is a Chinese and my uncle's wife is a Malay.... And their children are all hybrid. Lol
@@rajeevranjan7403 😂😂 study about kumari kandam (lemuria)
In Southern Kerala, until 1947, the family wealth was inherited by daughters and not sons. The 700 year old kingdom of Travancore had kings who are sons of King's daughter. If king had only sons, they adopt a daughter and marry her and the next king will be her son's.
@Msvks The Matrilineal system ensures people cannot take away wealth using Abrahamic conversions
Not all south Indians are Dravidians. Especially Kerala is established by Aryan Immigrant Brhamins. Brahmins from Kerala formed senators of various Indian kingdoms. As trade with these kingdoms became expensive affair, Rome realized that disintegraiting indian kingdoms is possible by evangelizing kerala.
@@avantgarde4783 wrong
@Msvks
Kerala did exist before with Tribal population. It has history going back to BC 5000. The tribal population exist still. Something like Maoris of NewZeland.
@Msvks Racism doesn't always means hatred. Before Hitler, it was not a word for Hatred. Races can co exist peacefully without intermixing if they botb have self-respect and not under influence of foreign ideologies.
The tribes live in forests. They grew honey for the king inside the border forests. In ancient times, Islamist attacks via forest were blocked by releasing honeybees.
Watch this.
ua-cam.com/video/hOhZKAGgbQU/v-deo.html
Also: indian subcontinent have different eyes than rest asians
@Yoo Yoo I have green eyes I am from Mountain North India Uttarakhand
@Yoo Yoo I have green eyes I am from Mountain North India Uttarakhand
@@superboy3633 I’m half from Uttarakhand as well and I have the normal Asian/Indian eyes.
Actually every person has thier own eyes nobody leases them dipshit
@Yoo Yoo Nope.
proud to be a Tamil brahmin🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Nothing to be proud about being Brahmin. Be proud about being Tamilian.
@dobermans are real sigma men 😂😂😂
@@anishapoorwakispotta7754 Jai brahman 🔥
@dobermans are real sigma men proud that ur a dog
@@anishapoorwakispotta7754 bro if you’re tamil you have to let go the caste or else slowly it will be no where
If take a closer look at northern India and parts of Pakistan, you can see some people who have slightly lighter skin and lighter hair. Maybe even blue or green eyes and reddish or even slight dark blond hair. The facial structure looks more similar to that of Europeans. Whereas in southern India, many locals look almost black and faces like Aborigines or Africans. very fascinating.
Not not true Dravidian also have blue ,green eyes even they are dark ( but they can be light tho ) I sees blue eyes man in south India and he has brown skinned ( most of north isn't fair but wheatish ) fair people are central Asian , Pakistan ( due to pathans, Indo Iranic people)
Research has found Dravidian are causcasoid and can be proto causcasoid ( oldest European look like Dravidians )
Lol not true, I'm a Pakistani we clearly don't have people of those phenotype who you are describing. Maybe we do but they are less than a 1% a very very small minority. Although you can find people with light/white skinned and black hair and eyes in India and Pakistan both the regions.
they have dark skin but they dont look very similar to africans at all in terms of features. its a unique population and as such the comparison is unnecessary, aboriginal/melanisian people are actually the least closely related to africans out of any population on earth.
There are no blue or green eyed people in native North Indians of Bharat. Stop spreading Iies.
Aryan migration is proved by genetics.Dont scream just accept it.
@SOURABH DHANUKA religious texts are not history.Throw them and believe in science. No matter u gonna believe it or not, it is the fact.
@@Quizooh North Indians are from Indus valley civilisation... IVC is not destroyed by aryans or anyone...
It's destroyed by soil erosion it's evident from the skulls that recovered from Indus valley...
@@haragopal1 hahaha this is not 90s man.Ppl who lived in Indus and Keezhadi are tamils.It is proved by genetics too.An 5000 yr old skeleton of indus area didnt match with aryans but with "The Irular" grp of tamilnaadu.The symbols,scripts all were same in both indus and keezhadi.It is proved by both archeologically and genetically,And aryans came 3400yrs ago as the genetics say sudden changes happened 3400yrs ago in north india i mean sudden genetic mixures ,The foreign gene got mixed up with the indigenous ppl of india Which is "R1A1" .this gene is the aryan gene which connects brahmins of india and jews .Brahmins are the Jews who came from khazar and I forgot the other place name.And the dam of indus was broken by The aryans who gave trouble which destroyed the indus civilization.The period of the aryan invasion and indusvalley destruction is the same .They (ppl of indus)moved to tamilnadu and developed the Keezhadi i mean Vaigai valley civilization with the symbols which exactly links with indus scripts and later brahmi(tamil brahmi) scripts which evolved from it.Ppl who didnt migrate to south got mixed up with aryans(today's northies) and they later improved brahmi scripts(U know tamil brahmi is 300yrs earlier to Ashoka brahmi)All these were proven facts by historians but still the aryans of north indians(brahmins) are not rdy to accept.U can search these things in internet . Research,learn.
@@Quizooh give me evidence that says IVC is destroyed by force not by climate change....
British said IVC is destroyed by aryans as they are beaty and developed race.... But it's proved wrong
@@Quizooh Brahmins and Dalits are same
Read the Ambedkar research....
Brahmins are all over India.......
Does Brahmins in Andhra Pradesh don't have same dna as Dalits in Andhra Pradesh....
Lol 😆😆😆😆😆😆
Read Ambedkar research on """who were Sudras""''
He concluded it Brahmins are Aryans so are Dalits....
If Brahmins are not Aryans so do the Dalits....
What about us in the north east of India who don't fall into your Aryan/Dravidian categories? We are Indians too.
@@yoloswag1357 What about the Boros, Koches,Ahoms, Karbis, Dimasa, Chutiya, Moran, Motok, Singpho, Khampti, Rabha, Saraniya, Totla, Modahi, Shyam, Turung, Phakial, Deory, Barmans, Reangs, Kukis, Hmars, etc.who are indigenous people of Assam. Again, many Nagas, Garos, Khasis, Manipuries, and Mizos (besides residing in their own states )also reside in Assam. Kalitas,the other indigenous people of Assam are, of course, of Alpine origin. Assamese language is of Indo Aryan origin but with Tibeto Burman and Austric influences as exemplified by Dr. Bani Kanta's monumental work on the Assamese language. Race and language are two different things you must remember.
@@manjitrupbikram mongoloid
Did he say you are not an Indian you wad? Its obvious where your ancestors came from. And this theory has quite some evidence backing it to. It will explain the fair skin present in Indians. Dravidians are not fair skinned people. Obviously somewhere the genes mixed.
@@manjitrupbikram you are mongol and indian
@@eldergod4817 it could be but still every indian dont look same we are different from each other..
Fake research...
Vai kindly reply this to top comments.
My family is 100 percent dravidian. Native to the land right from the start
not quite right. all human species are migrated from south east africa. except if you are in south africa you are native not anywhere else. and dravidian is locality not race.
@@chirucapoeira5191 false
@@iltoni6895 how? And what is false?
@@chirucapoeira5191 that we all came from South Africa very, very, very blurry estimations and nothing else. More importantly, if your people have been in a land for millennia as a majority, they are native.
@@iltoni6895 it is true that we all came from africa and genetics are the proof. if there is not enough evidence to disprove a theory of science then the theory is treated as fact unless future tech contradicts previous ones.
and no, people who live for millenia will not become the natives of the land in scientific context. if the land was barren and people migrated there, they may become native not the after comers. if we go to mars and reside for milleniums then we are natives but if the mars had its own species and we replace them or mingle with them, no matter how long but we would still be an alien to the land in science.
fyi: south asia had other species of neanderthals before hence all indians are migrants of various timeline.
Infognostica I think it would have been better for you to mention that the Aryans also invaded Europe & if I remember correctly wiped out the Matriarchal culture of the natives there. When people mention Aryan invasion it always refers to India & not Europe or Iran. This is where you went wrong.
Agree
He literally said that some of them migrated to Europe also....
@@angadsingh9314 whereabouts?
Where is the evidence of the matriarchal culture? Because they worshipped a goddess, Mother Earth? Were women dominant in their society? What is the evidence of this?
@@dirtycasualgamer9399 Marija Gimbutas's - Kurgan Invasion
That's the real truth that's why Aryans so called upper caste so much hate for Native Indians so called Lower caste because people of the same country can't have that kind of hate for their own citizens ...
ha ha outdated theory
the caste system has nothing to do with race lol, there's little to no genetic difference between a brahmin and a dalit
Gadhe Arya means noble and Vedic was a period on whole world Bharatvarsh means entire world so it was common to marry the people far away Indians have both caucasin ,australsoid ,mongoloid and African gene And Aryans live in tribe in uttar Vedic period they start living in cities
dravidians are real indians moved to south and unfortunately we dont get power in india in central govt
Most North Indians are also genetically dravidians.
@@blyat5352 their is no Dravidian gene , Dravidian is language that less similar to indo european Language , however similar to pre european Language like Hungarian , Finnish or uralic language
@@blyat5352 I say about european language cuz many don't even know just like Indo Europeans language theory, their is Also uralo Dravidian theory
Lol, even her name is of Sanskrit origin, meanwhile we will consider Tejasvi Surya as future PM candidate.
Real Indian are andamanese people.
Dravidian Daa🔥
@Superman Prime 1 million 😂😂😂
Can someone tell me what "Da" means? I'm Telugu and never understood what other South Indians mean when they use it.
Njan oru malayali ada🔥
@@louisthelemur1238 Dravidian da💥
@@dheva1502 Dravidian da🔥
How nomadic people created literature like 'Vedas' and Most develop Language like 'Sanskrit'.
First they tried "Aryan invasion theory"
*FAILED*
Then "Aryan migration theory"
*FAILED*
Now what? Aryan tourism theory?? Huh?
@@bhaveshtochabbra6853 😂😂😂
Haha!! Similar to Aryan Invasion is the Zimbabwe history. When British found an old civilization there... They said it was made by our old white ancestors who came many thousand years back, before us. The point they try to make is... Anything of significance has to be by them or their ancestors. This is how they put supremacy in their work
@@praveena7625 ok cool. Tamil is the richest language. Now u okay?
@@praveena7625
Tamil is the shittiest language.
There is no good literature in Tamil.
Ramayana and Mahabharata is big, There is no famous Tamil works
Cristian missionary working so hard to break India and convert them to Cristianity.
So modi is a christian ? ⛪
But they were late. Aryans and Dravidians were together already
Yes we can see what's happening in kerala
Jai United States of South India
Oonga boonga
@@patrickbateman1935 which language is this?
@@user-ez7ub4dq7x People after living in USSI: 💩
Amazing how defensive people can get when hearing facts they don't like. We Nth Indian's are descended from the Aryan's as well as the Dravidian's. GET OVER IT
Well, then we South indians aka so-called Dravidians are different than you. The real owner's of this land. The real owners of indian culture and traditions
A voice of reason in a sea of butthurt.
@@gauthamkshatriya2953 You might want to listen again. The video states genetically the Dravidians dont exist solo. The combination of both genetics is the resulting present population. The culture traditions and contributions to humanity are wholly yours. The world is better for it!
@@augustusmcgovern6084 Well i can confirm you we south indians are more sanathani hindus then north indian so called aryans lol. Even we are rig vedis also we south indians are the one who can chant samskritha properly. North Indians are nomadics and persion blooded not real hindus or sanathanis. Real Hindus live in south india. Also we are the one's who restored sanathana dharma (Shankaracharya)
@@gauthamkshatriya2953 My point is the nth Indian's become defensive when they learn that they are descended from Aryan settlers in Nth India when it is fact. But it is also nonsense to suggest that Nth Indians are exclusively and ethnically 'Aryan'. There has clearly been a mixing of Dravidian and Aryan across Nth and Sth India. To suggest that Sth Indian's are ethnically / purely Dravidian is also nonsensical. This shouldn't be a competition. If our ancestors came into the subcontinent 1000s of years ago, to suggest that North Indians are not real Indian's makes you as stupid as the North Indian's complaining about being called Aryan. We are all mixed and our ancestors have been here for 1000s of years. Both Nth AND Sth Indian's need to GET OVER IT.
I am proud dravidian long live dravidians ❤🙏
long live bharat this Aryan dravidian theory is bs
Dravidian is a racist term giving by English man to you which means uncivilized even the south kings didn't call themselves Dravidian you looks like a Propogandist
@@mac.505 it's real
@@mac.505 Dump go to school
@@mac.505 no only dravidians
I don’t know what to say the man who give aryan invasion theory he say the nomadic people invade the most advanced civilisation of that time I can only laugh on him 😂😂😂
Such a intelligent comment 👍👍👌
Most advanced. Maybe after egypt. Moroever the theory is as of now accepted my most historians
@@swapnil7521 no scholer believe in AIT
@@दीपकनागर-ज6द really? Soruce plz.
@@swapnil7521 it's changed to migration theory. Invasion theory has no proofs so it's no more
Your categories of Feminine and Masculine regarding Dravidian culture and people is completely false, perversely reductive and myopic. The mere fact that you chose those lenses to describe an entire people is evident that you have no clue what you are talking about and in no way understand Dravidian Culture nor should be considered an expert in this field no matter how many youtube links you have.
masculine / feminine dichtonomy is just odd not sure how that's scientific at all
How is one culture being more patriarchal than another “not scientific”?
It's not popular nor politically correct in the standards of people of today. But it is accurate. The mechanism of nature is always in the opposites (nothing - something, day - night, good - bad, masculine - femenine). I guess it's diffcult to understand because of our culture but it makes sense...
come to tamilnadu , india brother , see our temples and you can find we have 90 % feminine gods who were prolly our ancestors
@lord i dont understand what you are trying to say brother , all i wanted to say is that our female ancestors in hinduism are being prayed to as gods atleast in case of tamilnadu
Men are not war freaks
Women are not harmless
This is exactly a copy of the wiki page about "Dravidian".
First they tried "Aryan invasion theory"
*FAILED*
Then "Aryan migration theory"
*FAILED*
Now what? Aryan tourism theory?? Huh?
@@bhaveshtochabbra6853 aryan teleportation theory
Aryan time traveling theory 🙋
Haha!! Similar to Aryan Invasion is the Zimbabwe history. When British found an old civilization there... They said it was made by our old white ancestors who came many thousand years back, before us. The point they try to make is... Anything of significance has to be by them or their ancestors. This is how they put supremacy in their work
Why Indians are agitating, going woooo, waaa ? Something fishy. If I come to know some facts about my country, I would look into it. I wouldn’t go mad. There must be some truth here which India not able to digest .
It's just plain wrong. They are telling it how it is. All of this is just British propoganda
there is s diffrence between facts and fiction...
I am an Indian and I agreed this video , some one blindly opposes this theory because of some Political reason they try to hide The fact that they also come from Outside of India
Brahmins were medival war slaves of pagan origin doing menial jobs for their Master's & were transported to bharat (Afghanistan + tibet + bangladesh +pakistan+ srilanka) by the ruling brave tribes hailing from syria, iran, iraq and middle east.
This is true I am a hussaini brahmin.
It's the other way around lol complete buloshit ahahahh
Well! I see Indians fighting again.
They even fight in Srilankan history vedios, honestly they just fight everywhere lol
That is something we treasure and protect deeply within our ANI and ASI genes, lol. People in my country get butthurt for the pettiest things, sadly.
@@hiran4935 they even come in our pakistani pukthoon videos and say pukhtoons are south asians smh
I have not even witnessed a single comment regarding any debate or fight💀
@@ritviksood2654 People who can't fight in real life tend to fight online alot
You need to study more before making such videos, there are serious factual mistakes in this video. Get yourself a search engine and an unbiased mind.
What if your the one who doesn't know
Aryans getting angry in comments :D
@@sumairakhurram8890 same can be said abt u, islamist Arabic invasions, hypocrit much??
@@infinite5795 Aryans also foreign to India.
@@tamizhanda1850 Islam also foreign to india
Tamil is greatest and oldest language in the world..Tamil mother of all languages..We are Dravidian...
So?? What r we supposed to do with that
@@subhadeepbaidya1420 Go out India.
@@rajendracholan2938 then go back to Africa
@@vansh6038 Mamata Banerjee says once Asia is full of Tamil.. The real Indians are Tamils..
@@vansh6038 so you go back to Indonesia..
Aryans white, drawidians black.thats it. (:
You can deny all you want but you can't beat Genetic technology....... The assimilation did happen, but whether or not it happened peacefully is up for debate......
ua-cam.com/video/YLNJAB2HuRA/v-deo.html
it's fake report
@@Fun-qv7eh Just by you saying fake doesn't make it fake. Don't BS. Give your point of view with DATA that you want to present.
@Suraj Badhani lol indians went and spread over Europe lol that means we indians should have blue eyes and blonde hair
@@strikerron2252 is it necessary to everyone to have blue eyes it's just a pigment that is responsible for the blue eyes then what about the hazel color and many more different color of the eyes
your yin yang masc and feminine judgment killed the whole thing dude.
shut up femboy
Absolutely.
This video is not quite detailed on either the history or the genetics to really let people understand what went on back then, anyway. He probably doesn't even know the caste-system was already in place when the Early Iranians/Mixed Sintashta came in.
Dravidian 🖤❤️🔥
Indian
Love From Bangladesh, You People Are The Real Owner of India. Aryan (North Indian) Are Outsiders.
@@Adithyank2006looks like other invasion is needed
@@nusharfishcutting5306 Bangladeshi are also Aryan don't forget
North Indian are also real indian
According to your logic everyone is African
@@nusharfishcutting5306 yeah thats what ambedkar told
These idiot irani desent aryans captured our lands😢
We dravidians should unite atleast now😢 they are making us to hate each other😢
Aryans brought the myth of cow to sindhu ghati before that cows were not sacred and were sacrificed by natives india
Their is no proof of that , also archeologists found cow fat in pottery of indus which has definitely came from use of ghee,milk or curd , their was animal fat found in diet of indus not animal meat , milk ,ghee all have heavy cow fat in it
Aryans were of India not outside cow is sacred for humanity
Anybody that automatically assumes that the feminine cultures were the more passive never met my mother-in-law.
Your mother in law can fight with armed men?
Lol.
Some people here are offended because he called dravidians more feminine. You get offended if you think the masculine is better than the feminine.
The other thing is that dravidians were more peaceful, egalitarian and had next to no weaponry. Majority of population had access to running water, bath which too many people today lack. They are the best example of a matriarchy.
The theory about them being dominated by aryans is not plausible since they being so succesful and caring would more likely have welcomed them with open arms and intermingle with them which is supported by the genetic and historical facts.
The third thing that this video misses is that dravidians were introverted while aryans were extremely extroverted. Look at the difference, aryans explored the outer world while dravidians gifted us with yoga and meditation which is the exploration of the inner world.
Too think one is better than the other is both stupid and ignorant of the facts.
We are not offended because he called us feminine. We are offended because he called aryans masculine. You do know that rig veda has women composers too right? And it has female warriors too.
As a south indian we are proud of being a matriarchal society, but thats not the issue here. The issue is the assumption of aryans being central asian people.
Sinouli that's it
@@chirucapoeira5191 bruh both sides have both qualities but dravidians mostly preferred peace but that doesn't mean dravidians are feminine or some shit and also why are you being offended because he called them masculine there is nothing with it if masculinity doesn't exist then we wouldn't have existed also dravidians found martial art kalaripayattu
@@justarandomperson2957 where do you get these fantasies from? dravidians are literally the one and only group who somewhat waged war with outsiders. from odeya to cholas. they built cities like singapore through conquest and established their puppet kingdom as far as cambodia. unlike the northerners who didnt even step out of afghanistan when they had 100x the army of persians during mauryan era.
and you are talking rubbish and out of context. you dont even understand what we are saying.
good observation.
We are dravidians. We still keep our identity by loving languages and cultures, we worshipping nature's god's than man made religious gods and main thing is that we are not like or ready to war against any race. Our thoughts are very soft and still south india want to become most important place of the world through education and culture only, not through war, racism...
Vanakkam Thala I am a Malayali. We Are Dravidars by Marabu Inam and Malayali, Tamilar , Thelugu and Kannada by Dasaiya Inams . I Regularly Watch Adharmam Channel. I got This Information from That Channel only. The People of Kerala , Tamil Nadu , Karnataka and Andra Looks same While The North Indians Looks Different 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊.
I'm an Arya-Dravidian a Brahmin by ancestory but a proudly Indian. Whether our DNA's can differentiate but we both are together for the greater good of the Bharatvarsha. We both share same Dharma and have same motive to widespread it. Veer Bhogya Vasundhara
@@shubhankardasgupta4777 see , an Irish man and greek man has too many genetic difference yet they still come under Indo European family , scholars ever say invasion to native European by indo European so why india?
You don't speak for every South indian
@@greaterbharat4175 they do say its invasion in europe. but they call south indians the indegenous people unlike in europe where they dont differentiate any.
and the chitrakuta tribe of karnataka and ancient steppe pastorolist of yamnaya have more genetic relation than modern ukrainians themselves.
highest R1A1 composition is in india, that too south indian scheduled caste.
ARYANS came from mountains of caucus which is now Georgia and Azerbaijan and also iran. And i belong to a jAtt family of Pakistan , a proud Aryan
No I'm not a baloch. I'm a punjabi jatt. I don't know about baloch history
@@chusmanjutt7644 mullah? 😂 aryan? Aryan worship Indra Agni surya rudra Brahma Varuna Mithra like gods and They worship rivers nature worshipers. Allah is non-aryans cult
Aryan came from outside of india...
We are the native of india and we are dravidians... We are proud of our great heritage
Lol ur name doesn't tell u Dravidian. Stop lying
@@Gmmmw13 here comes a butthurt aryan outsider
@@दीपकनागर-थ5छ you first leave this country and then comment here
@@deepakkumar-lu6jf "here comes a butthurt aryan outsider".Insulting urself lololololol
@@deepakkumar-lu6jf go check your dna 😂
Aryan invasion theory is a false one but Aryan migration is true.
I believe, There were not Kingdom & Empires, thousands of year ago so they're was no war shed for land and resources.
skin colours based on geography, food etc. I have seen many Kerala,karantaka ppl are very fair and look like north indians where as ppl from tamilnadu and Ap are little darker in colour. Ppl in North India also mix of darker and light skin.we all are same.This colour discrimination created by Britishers to divide india and also the Aryan- Dravidian concept. I was laughing on one comment where one person was telling Shiva is north indian God😂😂 because he stays in himalaya.some stupid ppl divide gods also into north and south categories.
At first it was talking about science but on end he went full on esoteric superstition 🤨. Like wtf ?
Haha!! Similar to Aryan Invasion is the Zimbabwe history. When British found an old civilization there... They said it was made by our old white ancestors who came many thousand years back, before us. The point they try to make is... Anything of significance has to be by them or their ancestors. This is how they put supremacy in their work
@@pulz1191 This is not the same! There are linguistic proof of the Aryan invasions. Explain why multiple word in Sanskrit are also in Latvian and Lithuanian thousands of years later?
What astonishes me is that the confidence at which these foreign content creaters make a concluding work of such a topic no one have ever been sure of. It has been proved that this theory is a nothing but bs Pr0pAgaNda.
Its a fake issue nothing sensitive
Politicians have made up bulllshit.
N what kind of bs is this wE get To ReSeArCh sensitive topics
@@alice_in_wonderland42 yes. It's nothing but bs😡 i edited my comment.
the chad aryans and the virgin dravidians
Imagine believing Aryan migration myth today
Cope
Ultra cope , there was a movement of original Aryans but not from Europe but from the Eurasian mountains in Caucasus.
@@deebeefr lmao what a bunch of b.s
Imagine ignoring the fact that Sanskrit in a Proto Indo European languge. *Introduced* into India as well as the swastika. marxist Indians denying their own history.
ua-cam.com/video/4SRSWTkjfiQ/v-deo.html
@Khushal Mithra Nice try what? Don't get triggered. Don't want your money. You want proof watch the video I linked if you want to learn real non anti white cultural marxist history. Use common sense. I thought Indians were smart yet they're turning into the new we waz k.
Sir, your theory of the aryan invension /migration is basiclly just base on mere speculation , without any hardcore evidence . The DNA of Indians from South is very much similar to indians from north as compare to the larger part of europe, even the rakhigarhi specimen also shows no signs of AIT ,
Infact it supports the theory of migration from india to iran and then to europe. Both the language Sanskrit and vedas are originated in india and then migrated to europe.
Do you have any prove
Out of India theory is just a tool for religio-nationalistic politics. No solid evidence. Vague interpretations. And all people in India are the descendants of migrants. Homo Sapiens were originated in Africa, not in India. LoL
So you are saying some south Indians are pitch black and their features are not skinny because of south Indian sun that hit the skin of white north Indians who moved to south India. No way. South Indians were a mixture of Aryans and hunter gatherers who were the original African migrants. They occupied the land and Aryans invaded them and the hunter gatherers in Sri Lanka.
@@milochamp1586 soutg indians are not Africans but original indians like chattisgarh etc. South indians are majority fair in kerala and karnataka because of arab and jew mix
@@milochamp1586 you are right
Fact - this entire video is completely wrong.
Yea for Hindu andh Bakts duhh
@@erennn1620 lmfao and this video and both theory is coming from roman nationalists mud dwellers 😂🤣🤣
@@varshaa_ Go sh*t in the street first weirdo 😂
If Aryans came to India and started their own culture, then ofcourse there should be similar culture in Central Asia but there is not
@yitzhak shekkelsteingoldmanberg
Yes, East Europeans wear dhothi, pyjamas sarees lol
@Sudhamay
May be people of Himachal Pradesh migrated to Europe
@Sudhamay
Then y stil there is no same Vedas, Upanishads and other Aryan practices in Europe why only in India.
@Sudhamay
They just following vedic religion in their own version.
Everything spreaded from India to other parts not vice versa
This is true👈💯💯💯💯
Only for delusional people like you, uneducated fool.
@@Mj-in5uj who is uneducated?????
Recent studies , evidence ,papers proved that Aryan invasion was happened.... researchers from across the world accepted this ,
only northern indians still ignoring this fact like u ,, uneducated!!
@Ankit Tiwari shut up u vandheris🤮😂
What a senseless rant! Just take some exotic sounding words - yin, yang - mix it up with Aryan, Dravidian and there - a new esoteric gem is born. Infognostica gets the crown of mystic mumbo-jumbo.
ua-cam.com/video/rrWqZdpc58o/v-deo.html
Well, this debate is endless! I agree that humans have been migrating all over the earth. And we should be aiming for inclusiveness rather than divisiveness.
I'm specifically against the highly politicised Aryan invasion/migration theory because there is substantial material refuting it.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aryan-Dravidian-divide-a-myth-Study/articleshow/5053274.cms
swarajyamag.com/culture/so-what-happened-to-the-unambiguous-genetic-evidence-of-aryan-migration
swarajyamag.com/ideas/genetics-and-aryan-migration-setting-the-record-straight-once-again
swarajyamag.com/culture/aryans-and-dravidians-an-invention-of-racist-nineteenth-century-scholars
www.vedanet.com/the-aryan-dravidian-divide-is-a-political-myth/
varnam.nationalinterest.in/2009/09/the-aryan-dravidian-divide-myth/
Dimasa kachchari are the origin of ancient greater India, Aryan/arjya means they are coming from that place and outsider gypsy, hring khring bring swaha swami agni saraswati Dwarika hastinapur harappa mohenjudaro this words are belongs from Dimasa kachchari language....
Its almost like its talking about how the different cultures embodied the different parts of yin and yang and thats why he said it.
@balaji krishnamurty Hahahhah spot on.
I'd say this makes no sense but sounds like a credible authority with all those big wordy words.
Except experts don't usually spout random shit like "the principles in our DNA".. because what the fuck does that mean.
Being condescending while telling an entire culture to accept a narrative jammed down their throats by former oppressors is clearly going to be divisive.
So the issue has moved on from who's 'right' now, it's about him being a dick with godawful debate/comprehension skills.
I'm Eurasian btw, no horse in this race, but clumsily trying to redefine white supremacism as enlightenment is clearly not so fucking esoteric.
Brilliant , except that Ying Yang nonsense at the end.
As biologist Because, people are believing in truth...Aryan Invasion theory is true
* Archaeologically, there is no connection between Indus civilization and Vedic practices. There are evidences of arrival of Nomadic Aryans to India only from 1800 to 1500 BC.
* Harappan people had their own pictograph language that is closely connected with Dravidian languages. Aryans Sanskrit doesn't evolved as a script until Panini write Sanskrit grammar during 4th century BC.
* Aryans had a deep connection and affairs to do with horses. India is not a native of horses and no way connected with the practice of horse raiding and sacrifice
* Very importantly, sanskrit doesn't have any worlds to mention the farm equipment's. There is no reference of agriculture practices during vedic period by vedic people, that confirms they are nomads hailed from central Asia or any other location in the world.
* Sangam literature written in Tamil proves the absence of Vedic practices, Vedic sacrifices, Varunashirama, sati, unfamiliarity with horses in Dravidian areas..
* Aryan sanskrit has deep root with European languages and no way connected with Dravidian languages. Rig vedha is nothing but the modified form of Avesta. The battle of ten kings mentioned in the Rig vedha clearly denotes the Aryan Invasion.
* Puranas on the other side proving Aryan hostilities with Dravidians. If you have a microscopic look at Puranas, Aryans (Rama, Vamana, Narasimma, Matsya, vishnu) were always targeting Dravidian kings like Ravana, Mahabali, Hiranya, Hiranyakshan, Mahisha, Naraga and depicted them as demon kings.
* Puranas are no way considered as an evidence. If we consider their essence as as evidence, destruction of Dravidian kings and celebrating their defeat as festivals until modern time proves the Aryan invasion theory.
* There are people claiming that Aryan invasion theory was proposed by British to divide the Indians. Mortimer wheeler proposed the Aryan invasion theory during 1953. By proposing Aryan invasion theory after independence, how can British divide and rule?
There are anti elements trying to create another Purana by continuously saying Aryan invasion theory is wrong. But modern technology dont allow them to do so..
No Aryan invasion theory is proven fake
@@eldergod4817 your claim. Aryan theory Today is fact like gravity and evolution.
@@eldergod4817 humans originated from Africa is also fake? BS, does it even matter today when all aryans and dravidians are mixed. And explain why caste system exist in India since ancient times? It surely have something to with Aryan invasion. But in the end it doesn't matter, all are Indians including mongloid people from East.
@@lightr2187 caste system is not part of Hinduism it's a Portuguese system you idiot. The word caste itself is Portuguese, the Varna system is not caste system.
@@lightr2187 stop eating western version of history. It's a totally made up crap
IAM ARYAN....
LIKE IF U ARE ARYAN TOO..
@Rakesh Kumar so what ..we are indians..
Are you Moroun this is just theory not proof yet & all human are descended from Africa
@@pewpewpwq2526 iam homosapian..
Aryans are coming from begging food for India.
Idiot there is nothing called aryan, finish your school first before coming to politics.
Its been proven that there were migrations of several groups of people in and out of India. Presently all northern and southern Indians are mix of ANI(aryan+ASI) and ASI(Iranian+Hunter gatherers) with admixture level differing according to individual, geographical location, caste etc. No one is pure ARYAN or DRAVIDIAN. Some indians don't want to understand this and fight with each other claiming they are aryan or dravidian.
Secondly, according to recent archaeological studies it is found out that aryans didn't invade india but rather migrated to india and settled here. Sanskrit was formed after they assimilated to india it is not a foreign thing. Horses and chariots and warrior clans were already in India before aryans, it is recently discovered in sinauli excavations.
Also these people migrated from india to other places.
@farus killer The base ancestry of all south asians is the indus valley ancestry. All southern and northern indians have ANI and ASI ancestry with different admixture level.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_archaeogenetics_of_South_Asia
Even the paniya tribe who has the least ANI ancestry (according to a recent ancestry study) has 17 % ANI ancestry. Indians on average have 5-30% ANI ancestry and 40 to 70 % indus valley ancestry. When we go from north west to east and south of india, indigenous hunter gatherer ancestry increases on average, thats probably why we can see some phenotypical differences. Again southern and northern indians live in different zones, so darkness of skin is also justified as we go south.
The women in the video is a rare case. We don't know her genetics details. She probably has some gene mutation.
Nobody in india is pure ARYAN or DRAVIAN. All have mixed ancestry.
Well said
@farus killer what are you even talking about? What i meant was northern and southern indians are not different race but some people consider indians as different race(north indian and south indian), which is stupidity.Learn something dude.
@farus killer as far as I'm concerned ppl in north of India and Iran are Aryans
ua-cam.com/video/Ms66sy11P8k/v-deo.html
It is fake bro
@t s Muthuraman false
I am from pondichéry , Tamil Nadu...
Love you all ....❤️
Why you are not indian?
@@xrxnpop1222 what kinda question is this?? Never seen an Indian map before?
@Saloni Dam I think everyone has the right to express whatever they want unless it’s not hurting others’ feelings ..
@@trishitashivakumar744 tamils are not indians
@@мувн-ш4ы yaah they are from Jupiter .
I'm a mix of greek, balkan and india i can say i am 100% indo aryan ^^
@@Sajangrg69 lol
You suck..just shut up and accept you are a human being,,
@@AlejandroGonzalez-uo8ss fuc k off idiot
@@AlejandroGonzalez-uo8ss you shut up you moron
proud to be an indo aryan
ஒன்றே குலம்
ஒருவனே தேவன்
யாதும் ஊரே!
பேதைமை அற்ற வாழ்வே
பெருமைக்கு உரியது.
இட்டார் பெரியார்
இடாதார் இழிகுலத்தார்.
One is the clan
One is God
Anything?
Life without sin
To be proud of.
Itar Periyar
Itadhar is a tiger.
@@TheDak1234 here Periyar means elders😅
@@TheDak1234 not that periyar
Finally our Tamil comment is Spotted 🔥
Aryns dravidans north Indians south Indians
Aryans : we are the Badass!🎯
Tamils : Say it again!? 😂🔪🏹
Still we can't say that this theory is true. I am also tamizhan
@@TAnbalagan.9051 DNA testing is the Proof!
Long live Aryans
Long live european blood
@@a.b7797 😂👍
@@onduty7499 according to "lucette G r1a" research Indian variant of r1a ( oldest sampledate 15,500 years) in india this gene research happened in 2015 ( but mostly still west promote older 2007 research with no oldest sample from India)
What a load of crap, there is no proof that the migration was war like and just for your information chariots came a hell of a lot later and crafted iron swords
True
No
True, they're just calling the Aryans bad because they had lighter skin than the Dravidians.
*Proud to be descended from Dravidian (Indian indigenous ) 😍😍*
Dravida Nadu💪🏽
@Naveen Yadav hope you know about India's National Anthem.Grow up child only North India has this paranoid.And they call Mughal as Invanders. Hypocrite
@Naveen Yadav no they are not south Indians are different in appearance and culture to north Indians
@@eldhosesaji2327
Exactly. North Indians look more Europeans while us South Indians look native indian. :))
@@ncxdf1277 Have you ever seen people of Hindi belt?Most of them look similar to average south Indian.This Aryan-dravidian thing is not good for India.Are you a tamilian?
@@gouthamkrishnan6718
Yeah those North Indians are obviously more Indian looking n has more native DNA. I was talking about Punjabis/kashmiris/northwest Indians that are actually mixed with central Asians/afghans. They look more Eurocentric
Proud Aryan!!!
💩💩💩 outsiders
lmao
I'm bengali islander only in our island sandwip have matta rice which I found after moving in usa after 7 yrs living coming across a mallayi found out they also eat our rice matta I'm surprised
bro are you close from noakhali
Aryan picnic theory😂😂
Wake up bro Dravidians and aryans is fake theory India is one
@t s Muthuraman there is no evidence of aryans invasion you can also ask any archologist Or search on the internet
@t s Muthuraman where is that genetic study bro ur still in 2019
Aryan invasion theory brought by West with no prove cause they wanted to convert southern indians to Christian
Divide and rule 😂😂
@t s Muthuraman The evidence u gave is not called evidence it's just nonesense
Just think if aryan invasion happened than why there is no dead bodies found of that great war.
@t s Muthuraman but u can see the soil where mahabharat happen is red and historians already found the Dwarka nagri
But for AIT there is no base it's baseless theory to divide india and rule to convert South indians
@t s Muthuraman bro it's up to you now you can consider ur father was your neighbor without dna test Or u can consider ur father was aryan with no evidence
Proud to be DRAVIDAN
Proud to be a aryan from Punjab ✌️✌️✌️
@@wzsuniverse6494Fair enough for you since you are from Punjab but I am from South India so I support dravida nadu and dravidians
@@eldhosesaji2327 LoL 😜😜😜✌️😜
@@eldhosesaji2327 are u black
@@wzsuniverse6494 no I am Indian from kerala and my skin colour is brown/dark brown
aryans ❤❤❤❤
Lol,a real ariyans are living only at Himalayas ,that's not you
@@user_uuwi pajeet dravid 🤡
@@user_uuwi no , looks like you never read history, Aryan does not live a tribal life( they had no reason for isolation) they made empire,ruled , roamed all over India ,and if you talking pure blood no human in entire World has pure blood nobody can have pure blood ( if it they mostly products of nuclear family or incest )
@@gajendrasinghbhati4490the only p@jeet here is u
The origin of r1a is still not established. And here's the video creator already ready with his precise description of bronze age aryan migration. Different halogroups ofcourse mixed, it's just that where the halogroup "aryan" r1a1 gene originated is still nowhere near established.
It originated from the now Sub Saharan desert which was once a massive lush green forest with the largest lakes and rivers.
With Atlantis being the capital, but since the global catastrophe 10000 years ago which wiped out that civilisation, forced the massive Aryan group to migrate eastward and break down into several groups and travel to different parts of the world. Indian subcontinent being one of them.
@@intermilan9731 Wow, bro chill!
@@declanharp8644 WHats wrong pussi. There is actual empirical evidence supporting that. Along with records kept by ancient Greek writers and historians.
Russians doesn't have South Asian hunter gatherers DNA admixture while north Indians have European Hunter gatherers DNA admixture
@@skylinelover9276this doesn't establish bronze age aryan migration theory. Indo-iranic split perhaps happened around 3500 BC. If that's the case the central asian route for indo-aryan is wrong and iranic route is more plausible making the aryan migration earlier than bronze age, and perhaps also part of indus valley civilization. I am not claiming it's indo europeans are indian origin, but that doesn't make bronze age migration automatically true. Too much politics in academia. Read this a-genetics.blogspot.com/2023/07/hybrid-model.html
This is completely wrong
I have been studying on this subject for a long time
Arya means the higher purity in sanskirt and the latest excavation of behalki up state of India have a striking point that Aryan invasion is completely wrong and I have so many proofs regarding to this
Even the archeological and biological studies backs my statement
Shut up you didn't know our history because you are a White person
Irony is that both Aryans and muslims came through khaiber bolan pass but you guys spread hatred that they don't belong here?
Shut up
Proud Dravidian as we are the real owner of Indus Valley civilisation and indian subcontinent🔥. Aryans invaded indus and invented caste system and spreaded their agni vedic religion and renamed as hindu because old Dravidians had civilised lifestyle near indu river. Aryans then theft all cultures and literatures written in old tamil language as their own and mixed varnas and caste in it in which they can dominate as upper caste. Old Aryans are cruel minded and spreaded their false theories as they speak to fire, water, land. Old Dravidians were believed to be nature and ancestral worshipers. Now everywhere aryan descendents doing their modern discrimination to Dravidian community. We will fight for our rights until we die. We are not one ,we made to be one. So don't impose ur nationality and hindi on us. We are unique and we have our own equality culture. Proud Dravidian. Proud South Indian.🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥💪💪💪💪💪💪
Too much pride is making you to lose control of your cerebrum. Come out of your delusion and accept the truth that these are all myth which were debunked already.
@vishwa T 💯💯 true u r the original inhabitants
😌 🍭🍭 congratulation 😆
Real Owner 🤣🤣, Sudan and Ethiopia
you are succesfully brainwashed kid.
We Indians are all descendents of same people....The Aryan Invasion is a myth and Out of India Theory is proved to be right man
this is a false theorey
Fun facts is both sanskrit and Tamil formed and shaped and existing in India. Up to this day we can say tamil is the oldest and practicing language and sanskrit also old( not proven oldest) and still exists . And both language created and influenced many languages like my mother language malayalam ( which is a mix of both). We know for sure south Indians are also pioneers in sanskrit in that time . I don't know how but division based on language dates long before British. It was just like our kingdoms trying to prove which is better, but fun literally it helped to create most amazing scriptures in both languages and an unneccessary division . But unlike any other ancient language it STILL EXISTING ❤ . Please try understand and don't overstate. Just like we are saying I am not above or below you , I'm equal as you (which is namaste)
ua-cam.com/video/gbpdE8n_QWo/v-deo.html
Dravidian culture is hindu 🕉️ culture 😊 Dravidian culture is origin of Hinduism 🔱🕉 ❤❤❤😊😊😊
@@tokitomuimuiok
@@tokitomuimui
Current day Hinduism, is mixture of Dravidian culture and Vedic culture.
Nobody exists called Dravidian..
Aravind phoenix Rahul Dravid
I am a human
@@a.dnotta1772 😂
Indians have more no. Of race than population of some European countries, you quoted 2 , what about the others, we all are indians dont try to divide us
well india is divided in different cultures etc but is united "unity in diversity"
india is not homogeneous society. Indians are casteist and racist at the core of there hearts. they hate eachother. They've already divided themselves. There religion allow such division and hate.
truth hearts but you have to accept it.
Virgin dravidians vs chad Indo-Aryans
Sounds more like a fictional story, as you've provided no evidence.
@kaustabh mate the dna evidence actually disproves that. yes there were migration. but rakhigadhi dna is the largest harappan site with no foreign dna[except iranian from 11000yrs ago] with advanced weapons and horse chariots. you may have white dna but that doesnt make you aryan coz last 1000yrs we had invaders from turkey, mongol and british for gods sake. then how does your dna is linked to ancient vedic people?
@@chirucapoeira5191 man that's what I am saying but those propagandic asshole don't understand , vedic civilization was actually Indus civilization , brahmin statue founded in Indus ( priest king) ajectly match with how brahmin sit and mediate ( Indus priest king mediating trataka ) , also we found chaiorts without any foreign involvement in Indus site swatika symbol, woman with wrists banglas and sindhur , fire altars ( Vedic Ritual)
@@greaterbharat4175 not exactly correct. vedic civilisation predates harappan civilisation. vedic people are from gangetic plain with hymns and chants of sanskrit. while harappan people were urban and composed yoga. as vedic people spread from ganga to sindhu they all combined each others culture including idol worship or temple building from south.
fact: harappan were vedic people but cant confirm they spoke sanskrit[but i believe] yes.
misconception: harappans also the composer of rig veda.
vedic people and harappan people are like fingers and hinduism/dharma is a fist.
we cant tell if harappans did speak sanskrit or not yet.but we can have no doubt that gangetic people were the native sanskrit speakers.
lol. dont worry. no one subscribe to aryan theory anymore except those who are already invested in those studies. have you seen any young western scholars writing book about this? only indian left are trying this coz of their globalist agenda. in matter of a decade there will be no aryan theory. coz niraj rai[who believed aryan theory at first] says he has unpublished reports which would become a nail in the coffin. once he publishes that its all over. just like rakhigarhi his paper will bring a huge slap to indian wanna be whites.
@@chirucapoeira5191 yes , but for sure vedic= Indian civilization , we found the yantra tradition being oldest known tradition in India (25000bce -11000bce by archeological evidence) their is call yagna ritual is raplica of yantra ( not raplica but yantra to impress Vedic diety )
@@chirucapoeira5191 yantra have origin in vedic tradition even found in Russia (2000bce arkaim = ark ( konark) =Surya yantra styles settlement in Russia) which belong to Indo Europeans culture , right now yantra in India is not in temple form but as we still make big yantra rangoli and worshipped specific diety
Thank you bro, I'm a Dravidian.
no. there are no pure people left. Everyone is mixed.
U mean south Indian eh??
@@harry9238 Yes PROUD SOUTH INDIAN
@Archana Kulkarni , true!
It's a Sanskrit word. But our body stock [Racial type is South Indian]. You have NO right to ethnic cleanse our South Indian race. You should accept it, because we exist!😅
Dravida is a modified Sanskrit word "Trivid" (indicates India's peninsula, Tri=three, vid=directions. It means, Water/Ocean surrounded land. Gradually the same word became "Thravida", and finally Dravida. After some time, Aryans started using the same word to call South Indian native people, before it was for the South Indian land or territory. [Source: Ancient Sanskrit texts composed by Brahmin scholars] [Brahmins, one of the important Aryan subgroup].
*ORIGINALLY* [👇]
>>Aryans:
Racial Description- European skin complexion, Tall/Lean, Pointed Nose, Thin Lips.
Religion : Vedic Religion
Social Classification: Brahmin, Ksatriya, Vysya, Sudra.
Food Habits: Brahmins and majority of the Vysyas are vegetarians, Ksatriyas and Sudras are non-vegetarians. Beef haters! Cow (female cattle) is Godly figure.
>> Dravidas:
Racial Description- Native or Early Indian Settlers, Short/Heavy, Broad Nose, Thick Lips.
Religion : Ethnic Beliefs
Social Classification: Mainly Tamila, Kannadiga, Telugu, Malayali and other small Tribes
Food Habits: Majority are non-vegetarians, Some are vegetarians. Neutral stand on Beef! Cow was not a Godly figure, its male counterpart Ox to some extent worshipable! In South Indian Temples we can see Bulls' statues!
*OVER THE TIME*
Because of Aryans' more population and dominating nature, their socio-cultural and religious elements entered South Indian territory and people! Where as Aryans didn't receive any of the South Indians socio-cultural or religious elements.
ALSO,
Because of 4000-4500 years of interaction between Aryans and Dravidians, through social and biological mingling like marriages [mainly among King/Rulers, South Indian rulers married Aryan girls/ladies]. Their next generations started showing Aryan features as well in South India! Also, South Indian kings invitations to Aryan priests/scholars, attracted them for new opportunities in South India. Some of these priests/scholars married South Indian girls, once again this resulted in showing Aryan features in South India.
NOW [2020] in INDIA:
Through out India we can find Aryan racial features.
Currently Indian population is,
Aryans racial features: 45-50% population.
Dravidian racial features: 18-20% population.
Aryan-Dravidian mixed features: ~20% population.
Mangoloids features:~1% population.
Various combinations of main groups: 19-20% population.
@Archana Kulkarni Ever heard of Kumari Kandam? From where people migrated to Mesopotamia then Egypt. Aryans too were Dravidians, it's just about the migration.
Absolutely wrong theory and idea, Aryans were nothing to Influence Great Indus spiritual philosophyical social and most stuctured and Well organised Indus civilisation.
In every region of world there is a mix-up of different raises or people, so nothing seems to be great for aryans than other mugal percian arabic etc
@Msvks sanskrit is the mother of most languages
Egyptian,japanese,some greek,Sumerian ,indian gods are same because of migration from india
@@ayushmantyagi7156 but sanskrit rules and grammer rules are made by pānini...
He is called father of linguists... He has nothing to do with aryans
germanic & sanskrit are of similer indo-european language family...both hav same mother-lang group..
@@Tanveer0795 that's due to Indus valley civilisation is contact with every other civilisation
@@haragopal1 which type of conatct??explain.
Exactly mythic Aryans Aryan invention theory given by Britishers that's just myth myth but sad reality is that in school you don't read reality😢
It's not a myth
It is myth
I don't care who is Aryan or Dravidian all I see is Indian
Kamlesh Yadav
U should care , Aryan invasion theory is false and baseless.
Church propaganda is huge , they want to convert a lie into truth.
As historian proved this theory as baseless.
So Christens missionaries using UA-cam for their propaganda.
Totally agreed
Arians are the main reason for losing your identity. And adding the Second name YADAV with your name. We Tamil Nadu people will not have that because of many leaders like Periyar and we also can save oru language Tamil where else other parts of the nation slowly loosing their identities and following hindi and sanskrit
Rakigari is much older and the Indus valley went extinct so anyone who claims to have conclusive evidence in this topic is quite frankly a liar.
@ Any body why are you asking everyone to report ? We are quite capable of thinking what is what
Oh Alright Anybody. I saw so many of your messages asking them to report. That's why. No probs. Yup Satyamevajayathe. I truly believe that.
Vishal Maraj. Rakighari is recognised as the largest indus civilisation site, bigger then even Mohenjodaro by about 50 hectres. What are u trying to say exactly?
I'm dravidian.tamil
Respect
I am dravidian also. ORON tribe of jharkhand bihar.my language KURUKH.
Adi Malayali!
Dravidian culture is hindu 🕉️ culture 😊 Dravidian culture is origin of Hinduism 🔱🕉 ❤❤❤😊😊😊
It's not hinduism is the collection of many cultures
Puranānūru 335, Poet: Māngudi Kizhār,
and there are no groups other than these four
- thudi drummers, pānars, parai drummers and
Kadampans. There are no gods, other than the
memorial stones of heroes who blocked enemies,
killed their elephants with lifted, bright tusks
and got killed, to be worshiped with rice showerings!
Aryans probably moved down from Northern Central Asia or Russia. Where they split and some went to Europe and some came in Indian subcontinent. Assuming Aryans moved from Central Asia is a very vague claim made by historians. Its based on later interactions with Central Asian cultures. But originally even the asurs might just be Aryans too but grew as enemies.
Is there any scientific evidence for that?
Unlucky for those who went to India. They got assimilated and their descendants now living in the slums of India, when they could have been born in Europe instead, if their Aryan ancestors never bothered with India. LOOL
@@savitar8002 source: trust me bro.
Indians migrated form India to Europe
The Buddha had blue eyes and was Aryan. Iran translates to the land of the Aryans. Aryan has a noble context in India... Lol dravidians are in straight up denial. Even the goddess Danu who had blue skin has similar representations to God's in Europe who also had blue skin.
The Tuatha De Danaan were said to have worshiped Danu... The Celtic God of fertility, oh what's that Hinduism has a fertility goddess named Danu... Well well well isn't that just a coincidence.....
Archelogical department proved this theory wrong
Brahmin archeologist?
@@narendranarendra5143 😆😆😆 bruh.. Cry cry...
*tha enaku Hindi theriathuda..
@kseykshoykshaksat - what's your point?
@kseykshoykshaksat - No one today is Pure Aryan or Pure Dravidian. Every Indian is both Aryan and Dravidian to various degrees. I don't think I deny anything you've said. There's a reason why North Indian is called Indo-Aryan and not just Aryan. And why does it matter to you? So what if 80% Indians are non Brahmin origin (of course, why would there be any civilization with majority population descent from Preist/Scholar lineage? Seems that's how it should be). Calling one an Arya both in North and South India is very honorable thing (But that is viewed very old fashioned and nobody will even get you if you did.) If you're of Noble character and a follower of Noble values you're called an Arya. Aryan are those ancient people migrated to Iran and India bringing with them the term and concept. Indo-Aryans are the consequence of mixing of Aryans and other primals of India. Dravidian are also a consequence of mixing of Iranian agriculturists and Hunter Gatherers. If you're are of Noble character you'll be called an Arya too but not Aryan academically. Where's after Vedic Period all Indians mixed to various degrees. PIE shouldn't be called Aryan, Indo-Iranian of Southern PIE called their tribes Aryan not others.
Everything after 3:06 is nonsense