Siskel & Ebert: Best Of 1985 - Witness, Blood Simple, The Official Story, Streetwise, Shoah

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 сер 2021
  • In this episode, Siskel and Ebert talk about the best films of 1985. These films include: After Hours, Back to the Future, Blood Simple, Lost in America, Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, Mishima, Prizzi's Honor, Ran, Shoah, Streetwise, The Color Purple, The Falcon and the Snowman, The Official Story, The Purple Rose of Cairo and Witness.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 53

  • @paulvoorhies8821
    @paulvoorhies8821 10 місяців тому +4

    Blood Simple is an absolutely brilliant film. Especially for a debut.

    • @branagain
      @branagain 10 місяців тому +2

      I still think it’s the Coens’ best film.

    • @paulvoorhies8821
      @paulvoorhies8821 10 місяців тому +1

      @@branagain 100% agree. I saw it just a couple of months ago and might watch it again tonight. Honestly, I think it’s markedly better than Fargo.

  • @Jamal3.87
    @Jamal3.87 Рік тому +4

    My best of 1985:
    10. The Breakfast Club
    9. The Purple Rose of Cairo
    8. Witness
    7. Fright Night
    6. The Official Story
    5. The Color Purple
    4. Prizzi’s Honor
    3. Back to the Future
    2. Ran
    1. Shoah

  • @CR41489
    @CR41489 2 роки тому +11

    Both Gene and Roger had some real greats on both of their lists. 1985 did have some real good films. Glad they both had “The Falcon and the Snowman” on their lists. One of my favorites from that year. Great performances from Timothy Hutton and Sean Penn.

    • @acholl980
      @acholl980 2 роки тому +4

      One thing about 1985 was it was a big year for Steven Spielberg, 2 of the 4 films he produced are on their list with The Goonies being a cult classic (RIP Richard Donner). Also Shoah was the start of the Oscar's ignoring worthy documentaries that ran throughout the '90s.

    • @94Trish
      @94Trish 2 роки тому +3

      I also loved the Falcon and the Snowman. I think it was way underated by other critics.

    • @reneedennis2011
      @reneedennis2011 2 роки тому +2

      @@94Trish I agree.

    • @WalterDiamond
      @WalterDiamond 2 роки тому +2

      @@acholl980 Oh come on, it was only 9 and a half hours.

  • @adagiobreeze8493
    @adagiobreeze8493 2 роки тому +7

    The Breakfast Club and Kiss of the Spider Woman are my two favorites from this year

    • @JanetStarChild
      @JanetStarChild Рік тому +3

      Personally, the Breakfast Club is overrated and the ending was a disappointment.

    • @bnegs521
      @bnegs521 Рік тому +3

      @@JanetStarChild I disagree the Breakfast Club has stood the test of time more so than almost all movies on this list.

  • @rubbermaid4699
    @rubbermaid4699 Рік тому +2

    G-d bless these two forever for introducing 10 year old me to Werner Herztog, Midnight Cowboy...and just understanding film

  • @garrickragon1232
    @garrickragon1232 Рік тому +3

    The intro music, the movies, and of course these to men makes me long for for better and younger days

  • @kmetcalfe
    @kmetcalfe Рік тому +2

    Ah, 1985. The first year I had a car and had a job working in a movie theater. I could actually go and see the types of films these guys praised that no one else would ever see as there was no marketing, or they only played in the art house theaters. Many of these films played at my theater, a few I saw at other theaters, and some I've still never seen to this day. (Prizzi's Honor, I'm going to find you...)

  • @savage_skirt5386
    @savage_skirt5386 Рік тому +4

    '85 was a very strong year for film

  • @pdxtim97209
    @pdxtim97209 Рік тому +3

    Is Streetwise still available anywhere? I saw it in the theater, but it has disappeared, despite the oscar nomination. Great movie.

  • @pdxtim97209
    @pdxtim97209 Рік тому +2

    The Falcon and the Snowman especially relevant in today's headlines...some 21 year old in way over his head.

  • @littlekingtrashmouth9219
    @littlekingtrashmouth9219 2 роки тому +4

    Kind of a dull year. At least Back to the Future is a classic. I prefer Kagemusha to Ran, though it is a beautiful looking film. Blood Simple was the Coens starting off on the right foot. Purple Rose of Cairo may be the Woody Allen movie for people who hate Woody Allen movies.

  • @Mr.Goodkat
    @Mr.Goodkat 2 роки тому +5

    Wonder if either of them had seen "Come And See" yet crazy if they would think all 20 of those were better movies, also Ebert thinking Back To The Future isn't as good as Prizzi's Honour?, good gravy!

    • @linkbiff1054
      @linkbiff1054 2 роки тому +3

      If I’m not mistaken, Come and See’s American release date was 1987.

    • @Mr.Goodkat
      @Mr.Goodkat 2 роки тому +1

      @@linkbiff1054 Never seen Siskel say a word on it though and he was around for 12 more years after '87.

    • @linkbiff1054
      @linkbiff1054 2 роки тому +2

      @@Mr.Goodkat Well they can’t review every movie in the world that comes out

    • @Mr.Goodkat
      @Mr.Goodkat 2 роки тому +1

      @@linkbiff1054 They sure as hell can Chip! - Ricky Bobby.

    • @film79
      @film79 2 роки тому +3

      He’s definitely seen Come and See cause I remember him basically declaring a masterpiece at some point. Also like link biff said I don’t think we got Come and See till later.
      Edit- I looked it up Ebert had Come and See in his “Greatest Films” series.

  • @vincentwilliams5271
    @vincentwilliams5271 Рік тому +3

    The Color Purple is a classic movie and the stage play is good also.

  • @savage_skirt5386
    @savage_skirt5386 Рік тому +2

    Really? I've never seen the Falcon and the Snowman and I immediately knew it was Sean Penn in that clip.

  • @gooddoggy3257
    @gooddoggy3257 Рік тому +4

    The Color Purple was overhyped. Has not held up well over time.

  • @SoulStylistJukeBox
    @SoulStylistJukeBox Рік тому +4

    Beyond Thunderdome? Oof.

    • @tekharthazenyatta2310
      @tekharthazenyatta2310 Рік тому +1

      It's the worst of the Mad Max films by far. Ebert must've briefly gone insane.

  • @kennethzinke9168
    @kennethzinke9168 2 роки тому +2

    Both Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert reviewed Blood Simple on The Best of 1985, but is that not enough Siskel and Ebert because are they alive in 2022?

    • @robertawesome2410
      @robertawesome2410 Рік тому +3

      What??? lol

    • @kennethzinke9168
      @kennethzinke9168 Рік тому +3

      They did review Blood Simple and 11 years later, they reviewed Fargo.

    • @WordUnheard
      @WordUnheard 10 місяців тому +1

      What?

    • @kennethzinke9168
      @kennethzinke9168 10 місяців тому +2

      They did review Blood Simple in 1985 and 11 years later, Fargo. They are both best movies. 14 years after Fargo was reviewed, True Grit was released in movie theaters. Besides Blood Simple, Siskel and Ebert reviewed The Color Purple, Witnesses and the others on The Best Movies of 1985.

  • @footofjuniper8212
    @footofjuniper8212 2 роки тому +3

    No love for BTTF?

    • @hevyonez97
      @hevyonez97 2 роки тому +2

      It's on Gene's list...did you watch the entire episode?

    • @footofjuniper8212
      @footofjuniper8212 2 роки тому +2

      @@hevyonez97 must have missed it. I guess I was expecting them to praise it more in depth.

    • @hevyonez97
      @hevyonez97 2 роки тому +3

      @@footofjuniper8212 they did that in July when the movie was first released....

    • @footofjuniper8212
      @footofjuniper8212 2 роки тому +2

      @@hevyonez97 yeah, I've seen that one too. Just curious that they didn't give it more attention in this year-end retrospective episode. Oh well, no biggie.

  • @paulvoorhies8821
    @paulvoorhies8821 10 місяців тому +2

    I didn’t like After Hours-at all.

  • @branagain
    @branagain Рік тому +4

    I don’t understand the love for Prizzi’s Honor. And I consider myself a Jack Nicholson fan. I did not think it was a good movie.

    • @kennywood9911
      @kennywood9911 Рік тому +3

      Agree. Anjelica Hutson gave a great performance, but Nicholson's character was unconvincing, and he had zero chemistry with Kathleen Turner.

    • @iluvmylovebirdandmybudgiet7729
      @iluvmylovebirdandmybudgiet7729 Рік тому +1

      was a great dark comedy

  • @mattvandewater4840
    @mattvandewater4840 Рік тому +3

    And neither list had the eventual Best Picture winner, Out of Africa. A long bore of a movie. They were right to leave it off both lists.

  • @jdayala-wright8875
    @jdayala-wright8875 2 роки тому +4

    I'm sorry "After Hours" is a bad comedy, technically and visually sound by Scorcese but the screenplay sucks lacks any real cathartic comedy

    • @adagiobreeze8493
      @adagiobreeze8493 2 роки тому +3

      Goodfellas was a better Black Comedy

    • @Tokolos
      @Tokolos 2 роки тому +4

      First half is great, then it falls apart unfortunately.

  • @visitsoutherncalifornia930
    @visitsoutherncalifornia930 Рік тому +3

    This is where you realize Sisley and Ebert don’t hold up as journalists or movie critics. Back to the Future is an all time classic and considered a perfect movie in general. And it wasn’t on Eberts list and was number 9 on Siskels? Falcon and the Snowman is a movie nobody remembers and Mad Max BTD is considered the worst of all the MM movies by far. Even Mel Gibson hated it. Prizis Honor? Give me a fucking break. Witness at least got a shoutout. But where was Goonies? A classic that is still beloved to this day. These guys are and always will be elitists snobs

  • @freddyfurrah3789
    @freddyfurrah3789 Місяць тому

    I HATE THAT YEAR. WITH GOOD REASONS.