theres no way to be fully sure whether he actually reveals ALL his poker strategies, therefore the $1000 price tag is much too high. If you have that much faith in the course then give it to me for free and the first $1000 i win will go directly to upswing
By this logic, wouldnt it just be best to show a video where he won the hand? Just wanted to find an interesting hand to discuss from a high roller with Nick in it
Wow! These guys really are Professionals. ALL OF THEM! All of them have a stone cold statuesque poker face. I find it uncanny and interesting, that they all seem to be able to hold their poker gaze amazingly for the same amount of time it takes for Doug to get his point across.
I think you should do a reverse bankroll challenge where you take 100k down to 20 bucks and then back to 100k, and then maybe you'll be a respectable poker player
I have failed to make an effective joke in the youtube comment section..FML...I'll exile myself to the Doug Polk comedy Lab and try to comeback in a few months...i will miss you all!!!
Great video. Listening to you discuss hands has improved my game dramatically, especially when you breakdown what hands to call with in a difficult spot. You think strategically about the game rather than act on your gut feeling, and strategy will trump your gut in the long run.
I really like the fold. Phil Ivey knows he cannot be overbluffing this spot with his KhXx hands or he will be punting so much into a range that has an easy defense. So Petrangelo knows that it is very unlikely for Phil to be overbluffing this spot, which means that Ivey will very likely have less than 26.1% bluffs, which means Petrangelo would not be making a profitable calloff. Deeper analysis of river: For Ivey to be bluffing at least 26.1%, to balance out his combos of 3 AA, 3 JJ, 1 99, 6 combos of A9, 6 of J9, and maybe 9 combos of KX of hearts, and like 6 QX of hearts. This approx 34 combinations of value hands Ivey can have, so he needs at least 9 bluff combinations to be bluffing over 26.1% of the time (which is how often he must bluff to make Petrangelo completely indifferent with bluff catcher in this spot). So Ivey needs to be turning some kind of Kh hand into a bluff with at least 9 combos, and if he does not do it this often then Petrangelo can lay this down. But I would not put it past Ivey to be bluffing a spot like this, it just seems like a dicey spot to bluff for Ivey given he is facing a fairly uncommon line and his opponent is fairly polarized to a flush or bluff. So based off the fact that Ivey does not have a slam dunk great bluffing spot here, I like folding the 32. Even if Ivey is overbluffing this spot somehow, it was not likely that he was based off the way the hand played out, so I like playing safe and maybe over folding these spots a bit. But now if we are underdefending based off this logic, Ivey can start bluffing us wide and making a sick profit doing so, which means we must be careful in these spots to construct our calling range in a less exploitable way. So make sure if you underdefend this spot that you are not against a player who is capable of reading you as a player who will fold most of their hands to this raise. Or you will likely get owned. Sick hand I really enjoyed, make more vids Vanessa
You act like petrangelo would know the frequency that ivey would bluff with king of hearts. Sure if petrangelo had every hand that phil ivey played mapped out he might get a accurate statistic but how many keycard flush drse bluffs has petrangelo actually seen ivey do? Does he scower the internet searching for all the video clips of all televised clips of phil ivey playiing? How many key card fkush draw bluffs have u seen do on televised poker? I dont think there is more than one or 2. Do you actually think the# of televised hands ivey has played is a statistically significant sample size to gauge these bluffing frequencies. absolutely not, its the tip of the iceberg of the # of habds he has played in his lifetime. more accurate indicators would simply be how often is he raising all in on my river-bet in a tournament whether he is capable of raising all in on the river against me and my line with bluffs. another more sccurate indicator against players would be live reads but in case of phil ivey that might be hard, hes a great liar. But lookin at statsand wondering how many king high hesrt bluffs he woukd have is such an unaccurate measurement or indivation on how frewyently he actually does this. Phil ivey is not thinking about making sure he does this ~27.7% of the time rtc. he himself has stated he gauges his play with the habds hes being dealt, is he card dead or getting alot of premiums and bases his table image off of that To dictate his play
Justin Doss , Ivey is overrated. In 2014, Ivey is the second biggest loser in online poker. In 2015, Ivey is the biggest LOSER in online poker. Nowadays, top poker players run circle on Ivey.
@@danyhermawan7654 exactly Dnegs is still my boy and so is Doug love how they both play and how great they are at breaking down hands. I always play my suited connecters Dnegs taught me well :)
@@grimerat You may be right...I did find it hard to believe he would play an $800 Deepstack. I think he said his name was Kevin or something. But this guy looked incredibly similar.
Before I watched this video on UA-cam I had to sit through an ad for Daniel Negreanus Masterclass series....so yeah there is a better poker tuition video out there Doug.
i fast forward , it helps , some times the babbling is over the top, like in this video , especially near the end, i wish i could speed it up so he sounds like a chipmunk at least then it would be somewhat entertaining
Nick knew that Phil knew that Nick knew that Phil would never bluff there, so Phil decided to make a move where he actually DIDN’T bluff! Because why would Phil not just check it down for information if Nick knows that Phil always has it, and can just fold denying the information? Obvious valuebet. Ez fold. #HitTheMuck This is the kind of thinking these players are doing. - Joe Hachem 2015
@@sternbergjoe It is satire. Sometimes people post things about poker where they are over leveling and making things more complicated than they really are.
Doug, question about your river analysis. Isn't it better to check alot of your range when the runout is better for the IP player than the OP player? Its hard to imagine us in the bb have any full houses given the line. As the OP player can have almost all of it?
So K10 with a heart is a check call on the turn from Nicks spot because of equity? So we want to bet when we have meh or strong equity and check call stronger combo draws?
Joshua Patrick I also wonder if Nick has any form of check raising range on the turn. Hard to balance both a lead and x/r range but he is elite. If so, K10 with a heart does make sense as a hand to put in the x/r range as it has stronger equity if the turn is checked back and we arent given a chance to bluff than a hand like K8 with a heart. But I'm not sure if he has a check raising range and if not, I don't see why K10 with a heart wouldn't be in the turn lead range at least some proportion of the time.
Doug, raising FDs (like here OTF) is something old school upswing style gets very wrong. This is the worst FD to raise flop and the higher the FD the more often it should be raised. This is because when the flush comes in and the pot is bloated from the flop raise it's crucial to be on the better end of the flush vs flush cooler. So it's correct to put money in by raising higher flushes and coolering opponent's lower flushes, not donating with 3 high flush when it gets in.
I get what you are saying, but in reality the solvers suggests to raise all flushdraws at some frequencies in these kind of spots. Also the 32s has higher equity cause of the backdoor straight draw .
Great hand analysed like a boss :P . I dont get it though... How come it would make more sense to call with middling to lower flushes over higher flushes if ivey's is bluffing with Kh or Qh in this spot? Is it because a hand like QhTh or Th8h would be blocking hard Iveys bluffing range?
nik predom yes. If we know that Phil bluffs with Kh and Qh type hands (which is something we can't know for sure but for this hypothetical we will assume), then having K high and Q high flushes means that Phil's raise range on the river is more value heavy than it normally would be as we block the hands with which he has to bluff.
we also don't expect a 6 high flush to raise for value (it would value own itself against our flush heavy range). So all flushes have the same theoretical value meaning we'd be more inclined to call with a 5 high flush than a K high in that assumption.
Here's a fantastic "trick" to pull in a poker game... Say your opponent bets the river with what you think is an overpair, two-pair kind of hand with possible straights and flushes out there that you missed. You raise him and he goes into the tank and you just poker-face it. After a minute of uncomfortable thinking the player asks you "If I fold will you show?" Give him a little laugh and say something like "I never show for free, but you give me $20 I'll show you after you fold." Inevitably they'll kind of stare you down, and you start hustling the price down. "OK, $20's a lot, $5 and I'll show you." I've used this a handful of times over the years and I've never had a recreational player actually call the bluff. Sometimes they give you the money to see, other times they just fold satisfied they got information out of me. I've run one variation of this play where I had the ace that would have made the nut flush and my other hole card would complete the straight and told the player he could pick one card to look at if he gave me $20 and he could decide after seeing it if he wants to call or fold. He shot me the 4 chips, I let him pick the card he wanted (it was the ace) and he snap-folded after seeing it. Probably my proudest hustle ever.
One hand you didn’t mention that Ivey could go all in with is T8, preferably with one heart, which makes it a more difficult fold for Petrangelo with that one value hand that he beats, in addition to all bluffs
Joe if that’s all you wanted why not just watch the event? Instead you chose to watch a hand breakdown with analysis then you bitched about it.... typical comment for UA-cam nowadays i guess.
Joe and re-reading your comment, maybe you were saying that for the other comments that are complaining and if so then my first comment isn’t directed towards you but to the other complaining.
@@DougPolkPoker you go on and on and on and on and on though. (Get it?) You love the sound of your own voice. This could be 5-10mins shorter with the EXACT SAME EFFECT!!! YOU'RE A TWAT!!!
@@DougPolkPoker Pretty brutal these dudes here, but, Im a ling time student of the game and I fast forward through the bulk of your commentary about all the possible hands that could be out there or one could have etc etc.
If you guys do not like doing ranges or card removal than find a different person to learn the game from. Do not bash Doug on his video when it is well known this is what Doug teaches.
Maybe I just don’t know the data but how often do players bluff all in in a tournament when they really don’t need to? You have the smallest possible flush when Ivey could have all boats seems like just a fold conceptually
I really think u get carried away on over analyzing and u keep going on and on. I do appreciate your advice and u have helped my game in some situations.
It'd be cool if you did the hand nick played from this tournement where he check/raise barreled off against Dnegs on the stone bubble. That was a sick hand.
And what's the debate or conversation about? He's got the weakest flush out there and on the river someone goes over the top all in. 2,3 flush fold with not much thought. Sometimes you gotta fold a good hand to play a better one
Get Nick Petrangelo's course, Winning Poker Tournaments, here: upswingpoker.com/winning-poker-tournaments-with-nick-petrangelo/
Would totally get it if I could. But I can't afford $999 lul
theres no way to be fully sure whether he actually reveals ALL his poker strategies, therefore the $1000 price tag is much too high.
If you have that much faith in the course then give it to me for free and the first $1000 i win will go directly to upswing
I can vouche for Nick, his mom nit me a scarf the other day and its the shit!
Doug Polk Poker k,
Does he decide to make that decision? Reminds me of when somebody said Anderson Silvas precision is so precise :)
at first i was like why do you have a poster of vanessa selbst on your wall until you zoomed in and its you lol
This comment wins!😆😆
hahahaha i didnt notice!!! hahahah exactly
@@renatocherato but its really her, right?
@@maximo6037 lol now I'm really confused, it really looks like Vanessa to me :D Lets keep watching maybe it is not
@@lenux112 the face shape looks like Vanessa to me too
not surprised he folded, Doug wouldn't try and sell us the guys course and then show us a video of him making the wrong call
By this logic, wouldnt it just be best to show a video where he won the hand?
Just wanted to find an interesting hand to discuss from a high roller with Nick in it
@@DougPolkPoker Thats to obvious Doug. You are to smart for stuff like that. :P
Winning a pot generally takes alot less skill than making a great fold in a tight spot though, the guy is certainly right, which is fine overall
@@JakcCSGO your game is so high end that you leveled yourself into another dimension
not exactly since your focus is often on decision analysis, not analysis of results.
The hand starts at 2:40. You’re welcome.
Ty
That scene from Rounders was so well placed. Bravo!!!😈
I thought of the hand the instant the 9 fell on the river. Lol.
@@jeffreyyoungblood7438 #me too
@@strangelyrepulsive77 who else got molested by a 9 on the river, come on, don't be shy
ua-cam.com/users/shortsJTMWg8rf8pk?feature=share
Wow! These guys really are Professionals. ALL OF THEM! All of them have a stone cold statuesque poker face. I find it uncanny and interesting, that they all seem to be able to hold their poker gaze amazingly for the same amount of time it takes for Doug to get his point across.
Couldn't agree more. it almost looks as if Doug paused the video, they did not move at all.
ua-cam.com/users/shortsJTMWg8rf8pk?feature=share
I think you should do a reverse bankroll challenge where you take 100k down to 20 bucks and then back to 100k, and then maybe you'll be a respectable poker player
He already is a respectable poker player. You don't win a WSOP bracelet by being a mediocre player.
@@jimmybroughton2956 /s
Haters gonna hate I guess
I have failed to make an effective joke in the youtube comment section..FML...I'll exile myself to the Doug Polk comedy Lab and try to comeback in a few months...i will miss you all!!!
Jamie Gold already proved you wrong
Why does Vanessa Selbst make a poker video with a pic of Doug Polk winning a bracelet on the wall? Seems just weird
No, she retired...this Doug Polk guy is just her doppelganger.
So meta....
Wait a minute. Whut? I thought this was a Doug Polk video with a picture of Vanessa on the wall? Aren't they an item?
Dude, the joke is old!
An ad for dnegs masterclass came on before this vid..lol
Dan James Lesson One - If the rake is too high, it's actually better...
A. Mathew C Negs and Vanessa have an ongoing feud so it’s ironic
I was looking for this comment
It’s still showing a year later... Good for Doug. Making some ad revenue...
That's why you don't call a preflop raise out of position with 32 suited, you get into trouble hands.
To avoid needless B.S., skip to 3:00
Really happy to see you're still doing poker hands! Thanks Doug!
ua-cam.com/users/shortsJTMWg8rf8pk?feature=share
Great video. Listening to you discuss hands has improved my game dramatically, especially when you breakdown what hands to call with in a difficult spot. You think strategically about the game rather than act on your gut feeling, and strategy will trump your gut in the long run.
ua-cam.com/users/shortsJTMWg8rf8pk?feature=share
I really like the fold. Phil Ivey knows he cannot be overbluffing this spot with his KhXx hands or he will be punting so much into a range that has an easy defense. So Petrangelo knows that it is very unlikely for Phil to be overbluffing this spot, which means that Ivey will very likely have less than 26.1% bluffs, which means Petrangelo would not be making a profitable calloff.
Deeper analysis of river:
For Ivey to be bluffing at least 26.1%, to balance out his combos of 3 AA, 3 JJ, 1 99, 6 combos of A9, 6 of J9, and maybe 9 combos of KX of hearts, and like 6 QX of hearts. This approx 34 combinations of value hands Ivey can have, so he needs at least 9 bluff combinations to be bluffing over 26.1% of the time (which is how often he must bluff to make Petrangelo completely indifferent with bluff catcher in this spot).
So Ivey needs to be turning some kind of Kh hand into a bluff with at least 9 combos, and if he does not do it this often then Petrangelo can lay this down. But I would not put it past Ivey to be bluffing a spot like this, it just seems like a dicey spot to bluff for Ivey given he is facing a fairly uncommon line and his opponent is fairly polarized to a flush or bluff. So based off the fact that Ivey does not have a slam dunk great bluffing spot here, I like folding the 32. Even if Ivey is overbluffing this spot somehow, it was not likely that he was based off the way the hand played out, so I like playing safe and maybe over folding these spots a bit.
But now if we are underdefending based off this logic, Ivey can start bluffing us wide and making a sick profit doing so, which means we must be careful in these spots to construct our calling range in a less exploitable way. So make sure if you underdefend this spot that you are not against a player who is capable of reading you as a player who will fold most of their hands to this raise. Or you will likely get owned.
Sick hand I really enjoyed, make more vids Vanessa
thepokerfish awesome
There’s no way Ivey was thinking on this level during this game
He thinks below that level?
You act like petrangelo would know the frequency that ivey would bluff with king of hearts. Sure if petrangelo had every hand that phil ivey played mapped out he might get a accurate statistic but how many keycard flush drse bluffs has petrangelo actually seen ivey do? Does he scower the internet searching for all the video clips of all televised clips of phil ivey playiing? How many key card fkush draw bluffs have u seen do on televised poker? I dont think there is more than one or 2. Do you actually think the# of televised hands ivey has played is a statistically significant sample size to gauge these bluffing frequencies. absolutely not, its the tip of the iceberg of the # of habds he has played in his lifetime. more accurate indicators would simply be how often is he raising all in on my river-bet in a tournament whether he is capable of raising all in on the river against me and my line with bluffs. another more sccurate indicator against players would be live reads but in case of phil ivey that might be hard, hes a great liar. But lookin at statsand wondering how many king high hesrt bluffs he woukd have is such an unaccurate measurement or indivation on how frewyently he actually does this. Phil ivey is not thinking about making sure he does this ~27.7% of the time rtc. he himself has stated he gauges his play with the habds hes being dealt, is he card dead or getting alot of premiums and bases his table image off of that To dictate his play
Live 2Learn exactly that’s a very good point
Phil Ivey is the master. I would love to meet the dude. I've watched and been his fan since I was 18. I'm now 32. Lol
Have the same age, but my favorite was Dnegs
Justin Doss , Ivey is overrated. In 2014, Ivey is the second biggest loser in online poker. In 2015, Ivey is the biggest LOSER in online poker. Nowadays, top poker players run circle on Ivey.
@@danyhermawan7654 exactly Dnegs is still my boy and so is Doug love how they both play and how great they are at breaking down hands. I always play my suited connecters Dnegs taught me well :)
you should get that luke schwartz graph framed tbh
I never knew that was Luke's graph. It makes perfect sense now
I think Doug just likes hearing himself talk
I ran into Petrangelo when he was playing a Venetian Deepstack. He totally introduced himself with a different name. The Meta Game is strong!
theres another tourney reg who looks very much like him, maybe you ran into his doppleganger.
@@grimerat You may be right...I did find it hard to believe he would play an $800 Deepstack. I think he said his name was Kevin or something. But this guy looked incredibly similar.
"His range is RICH with full houses." :)
Ryan Lim saturated even. Brimming. Teeming. Overflowing.
11.15 wtf i never thought the Goat Ivey would ever sit like this🤦♂️😂
Lukas Helmhart thought I was the only one who was horrified
Thumbs up if you're the type of guy who doesn't have $1000 just lying around to throw at a poker course....
I think I'd rather blow 1000 playing poker in hopes that I get better.
You can buy MasterClass for about $179
Both Phil Ivey and Daniel Negreanu have classes on there. It’s pretty legit.
Before I watched this video on UA-cam I had to sit through an ad for Daniel Negreanus Masterclass series....so yeah there is a better poker tuition video out there Doug.
Haha, lesson #1 table selection: find the one with the HIGHEST rake.
Is there a stack size or game type/environment where u fold a9 off per on the button?
Yes.
And THIS is why Nick Petrangelo is part of the Upswing crew. Nice fold.
The question is how many bigger fluffs are there?!
What would be REALLY interesting if Doug would make comments BEFORE the hole cards were revealed to HIM.
That moment when you realize it's a 5 hour long Polk video instead of just a 3 minute clip of the actual hand. :(
i fast forward , it helps , some times the babbling is over the top, like in this video , especially near the end, i wish i could speed it up so he sounds like a chipmunk at least then it would be somewhat entertaining
That was a very good read by petra
Alright Doug how much was Bruce buffers video and what’s his contact information
Why do we have to watch the action twice every time!? Can you not just do the explanations whilst we watch the first time pleeeasse.
Hova seriously its so annoying lmao
Please dear God yes, groundhog poker day
Was it actually worth getting Bruce Buffer
I would never have subscribed for Upswing Poker. But with this Bruce Buffer speech, I subscribed twice.
Every fucking penny
I can’t stand Bruce. His brother is great.
2:08 when did Russell Wilson become s professional poker player
Nick knew that Phil knew that Nick knew that Phil would never bluff there, so Phil decided to make a move where he actually DIDN’T bluff! Because why would Phil not just check it down for information if Nick knows that Phil always has it, and can just fold denying the information? Obvious valuebet. Ez fold. #HitTheMuck
This is the kind of thinking these players are doing.
- Joe Hachem 2015
lol :D
Huh? This makes no sense.
@@sternbergjoe It is satire. Sometimes people post things about poker where they are over leveling and making things more complicated than they really are.
Doug, question about your river analysis. Isn't it better to check alot of your range when the runout is better for the IP player than the OP player? Its hard to imagine us in the bb have any full houses given the line. As the OP player can have almost all of it?
Yeah it is, but as stacks get shorter you dont have to be as worried about your opponent having a range of the nuts you dont have
17:46
"There are some bigger fluffs"
Dude I'm fluffin right now
Doug is there a way we can analyze the hand before and make our own notes and then watch the video?
Realized thats difficult to pull off without playing spoiler
Why does Venessa have a poster of Doug??
Great play from Pietrangelo, that’s exactly why the Golden Knights signed him!
Does hi stake strategy carry over to low stake (much lower), not planning on playing any 100k buy in tourneys
glad to see you back making videos doug I missed you
Hi Doug, surely all the 9xhh combos nick has are by far the best call combos, as you block all the J9 and A9 99, combos?
the problem is i play low stakes. how can i playlike your pros wen we play dif type players. upswing does not help small stakes does it?
Wheren n how do i play for cash online? Tournaments, cash game , where?
Pokerstars, Partypoker and 888 Poker are the three biggest sites. Give them all a try, and get a feel for which one is for you
Doug, have you considered calling your videos "Polker hands"? Sounds kinda cool
Great content thks Doug. Would be interesting to hear Nicks evalution of that hand, and if a fold is the 'correct' decision overall.
best
Such a gut wrenching fold. I would have called every time. That's why I'm not one of these guys. Wow. So good.
would have been fine to call here too, even from the money
Where is "PolkerNews"?
So K10 with a heart is a check call on the turn from Nicks spot because of equity? So we want to bet when we have meh or strong equity and check call stronger combo draws?
Joshua Patrick I also wonder if Nick has any form of check raising range on the turn. Hard to balance both a lead and x/r range but he is elite. If so, K10 with a heart does make sense as a hand to put in the x/r range as it has stronger equity if the turn is checked back and we arent given a chance to bluff than a hand like K8 with a heart. But I'm not sure if he has a check raising range and if not, I don't see why K10 with a heart wouldn't be in the turn lead range at least some proportion of the time.
Is Ivey really turning AJ into a bluff here? I feel like theres no way... especially that quickly.
A-J?
Anyone else get a Daniel N. Ad when watching this?
Buffer probably wasn’t cheap.
I love how Doug put the Rounders movie into it lol
Whos's graph is in the background?
After making announcement that Petrangelo was teaching a course on his site. I knew a fold was coming. Then I immediately signed up....... NOT
LMAO, if Poke knew as much about poker as he thinks he does, he'd still be a half-assed player.
Bruh he has two bracelets?
Silly comment.
@@georgejung5429 if you say so skippy.
@@52Rambler I do.
Can’t knock a guy who’s earned 10+ million playing poker.
Doug, raising FDs (like here OTF) is something old school upswing style gets very wrong. This is the worst FD to raise flop and the higher the FD the more often it should be raised. This is because when the flush comes in and the pot is bloated from the flop raise it's crucial to be on the better end of the flush vs flush cooler. So it's correct to put money in by raising higher flushes and coolering opponent's lower flushes, not donating with 3 high flush when it gets in.
I get what you are saying, but in reality the solvers suggests to raise all flushdraws at some frequencies in these kind of spots. Also the 32s has higher equity cause of the backdoor straight draw .
@@juusokoskela7075 but any SC there has a backdoorstraightdraw..
Do you think Ivey shoves all combos of AxKh and JxKh on river (6 combos total)? How does that change math on call?
doug polks a pro when he can see the whole cards
no way man, even if he didn't have insight into the flops, he'd still be a genius LMAO
Doug, why do you already need a new MTT course on upswing?
What about Pratush Buddigga's course?
Will this one be more geared towards beginners etc?
He let's me know I will never play at a live table in person. I have no idea what he is talking about. It's over my head.
We will get to hear some the interworkings of his poker mind "Fuck"
Great hand analysed like a boss :P . I dont get it though... How come it would make more sense to call with middling to lower flushes over higher flushes if ivey's is bluffing with Kh or Qh in this spot? Is it because a hand like QhTh or Th8h would be blocking hard Iveys bluffing range?
nik predom yes. If we know that Phil bluffs with Kh and Qh type hands (which is something we can't know for sure but for this hypothetical we will assume), then having K high and Q high flushes means that Phil's raise range on the river is more value heavy than it normally would be as we block the hands with which he has to bluff.
we also don't expect a 6 high flush to raise for value (it would value own itself against our flush heavy range). So all flushes have the same theoretical value meaning we'd be more inclined to call with a 5 high flush than a K high in that assumption.
You were great on PKA
Much appreciated
Here's a fantastic "trick" to pull in a poker game... Say your opponent bets the river with what you think is an overpair, two-pair kind of hand with possible straights and flushes out there that you missed. You raise him and he goes into the tank and you just poker-face it. After a minute of uncomfortable thinking the player asks you "If I fold will you show?"
Give him a little laugh and say something like "I never show for free, but you give me $20 I'll show you after you fold." Inevitably they'll kind of stare you down, and you start hustling the price down. "OK, $20's a lot, $5 and I'll show you." I've used this a handful of times over the years and I've never had a recreational player actually call the bluff. Sometimes they give you the money to see, other times they just fold satisfied they got information out of me.
I've run one variation of this play where I had the ace that would have made the nut flush and my other hole card would complete the straight and told the player he could pick one card to look at if he gave me $20 and he could decide after seeing it if he wants to call or fold. He shot me the 4 chips, I let him pick the card he wanted (it was the ace) and he snap-folded after seeing it. Probably my proudest hustle ever.
One hand you didn’t mention that Ivey could go all in with is T8, preferably with one heart, which makes it a more difficult fold for Petrangelo with that one value hand that he beats, in addition to all bluffs
Good video. The fast forward button comes in real handy when you just want to see the action take place.
Joe if that’s all you wanted why not just watch the event? Instead you chose to watch a hand breakdown with analysis then you bitched about it.... typical comment for UA-cam nowadays i guess.
Joe and re-reading your comment, maybe you were saying that for the other comments that are complaining and if so then my first comment isn’t directed towards you but to the other complaining.
Ivey playing that time bank chip before jamming is gangster
Rounders is 5/5 greatest poker ASMR movie ever created.
Phil Ivey could have Ace King, Ace Queen, Ace Jack, Ace ten. I'm sure it was tempting to call. Nice fold.
Those hands would just call not raise
If you didn't flash your photo, I would have thought the picture behind you was of Vanessa Selbst
Why do you have a photo of Vanessa Selbst winning a tournament on your wall?
Damn it, everyone already made this joke 😭
Yo can you put your screen shot in the thumbnail
So it was hilarious to see Negraneau(?) in a YT add before your video. Lol
whoose graph is that in background?
how many hands in that hour 2 or you think you might be able t squeeze a third one in
This video would've been better without the guy in the corner stopping the video and babbling about the obvious.
Cant do that bud, this channel is to analyze popular poker hands
Doug Polk Poker I think he is right. If someone tells me how to play Poker, I want it atleast to be someone who understands how Rake works.
@@DougPolkPoker you go on and on and on and on and on though. (Get it?) You love the sound of your own voice. This could be 5-10mins shorter with the EXACT SAME EFFECT!!!
YOU'RE A TWAT!!!
@@DougPolkPoker Pretty brutal these dudes here, but, Im a ling time student of the game and I fast forward through the bulk of your commentary about all the possible hands that could be out there or one could have etc etc.
If you guys do not like doing ranges or card removal than find a different person to learn the game from. Do not bash Doug on his video when it is well known this is what Doug teaches.
I would love to see Doug lay this down against Phil Ivey. I don't see that happening.
how much was the bruce buffer appearance?
How did you do that Bruce buffer thing did he do that for you lmao?
Why do I always struggle to stay awake while Doug is rambling on.........
Dude....so why are you watching ???
I gave up after a few minutes.
Ivey wasn't thinking a call. He was dreaming about going to vegas and competing in the wsop main event
found out about you on PKA, after watching about 10 hours of your videos, I finally made $100 starting from $3 :D
I just see the Ace peel right away and a full flop of red color... ACTION
Maybe I just don’t know the data but how often do players bluff all in in a tournament when they really don’t need to? You have the smallest possible flush when Ivey could have all boats seems like just a fold conceptually
Hahaha that was an awesome introduction
i cant find buddiga course
Doug, do you think Ivey could represent AKo with the King of hearts even after checking the turn?
Ivey called nicks lead not checked
I think kh9x is the only realistic bluff combo here
Also doug do you think the invariancy in the AJ offshoot coupled with the matrix possibility of the inverted 5K sequence might have a chance??
and if so, should i go all in or use the euclidean evaluation to determine my next bet?
what’s that from 11:28
What's with the Big scarf???
Will this course be discounted on Black Friday?
I really think u get carried away on over analyzing and u keep going on and on. I do appreciate your advice and u have helped my game in some situations.
No thank you, I will continue to stick to my "Jamie Gold tips to win tournaments!"
Ivey bluff off his wsop main event. Nick was probably thinking about his
Gekko's Opinion , yep
Thanks for coming on pka.
It'd be cool if you did the hand nick played from this tournement where he check/raise barreled off against Dnegs on the stone bubble. That was a sick hand.
Dam that's a great fold
What hand calls Nicks river bet that he can beat? Maybe Phil thinks hes bluffing and hero calls with Ax? Bet fold river is optimal over check?
starts at 2:40
And what's the debate or conversation about? He's got the weakest flush out there and on the river someone goes over the top all in. 2,3 flush fold with not much thought. Sometimes you gotta fold a good hand to play a better one
Wow he’s from Old Westbury? Lol I’m around the block watching this.