Will The F-117 NIGHTHAWK Be Good? (War Thunder Dev Server)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 289

  • @WeBeStronk
    @WeBeStronk  27 днів тому +46

    SLETH PLEN is finally in the game!! Who'd have thought... the F-117 in War Thunder. Pigs truly can fly... what are your thoughts on it being added?

  • @maggaming7969
    @maggaming7969 27 днів тому +118

    I feel like this plane will boil down to this...
    Air-AB=dead on sight... Air RB=dead on sight... Ground RB= they don't ever see you at 35,000 feet dunkin' on half the enemy team... Sim= same, you are invisible and bombing airfields with impunity... It's a SIM grinder for sure... the only way you can find the thing in sim is to see it... and if you are playing a night game, its over for the enemy airfield...

    • @AHSValor
      @AHSValor 27 днів тому +8

      Inb4 aeoilaeiepae absolutely slaughters Air-AB with it somehow

    • @maggaming7969
      @maggaming7969 27 днів тому +3

      @@AHSValor somehow that wouldn't surprise me if he bombed the entire enemy team out of the air with it...

    • @AHSValor
      @AHSValor 27 днів тому

      @@maggaming7969 If there are GBUs, he will find a way

    • @sniper321fire
      @sniper321fire 26 днів тому +6

      Half the team, how you got 2 bombs, so 2 kills unless a group maybe 3 or 4 then

    • @SomeOrdinaryJanitor
      @SomeOrdinaryJanitor 26 днів тому

      @@sniper321fire Air Arcade reloads your ammo after an amount of time

  • @hypoel1660
    @hypoel1660 27 днів тому +204

    It's just a bomber with no deffensive option, like a bucanneer s1 or camberra

    • @WeBeStronk
      @WeBeStronk  27 днів тому +36

      At least the Canberra can turn!

    • @hypoel1660
      @hypoel1660 27 днів тому +3

      @@WeBeStronk but the bucanneer s1 can't :)

    • @hypoel1660
      @hypoel1660 27 днів тому +10

      @@WeBeStronk btw i think you need to fly the nighthawk above 8 km or 11km

    • @LB-ye1fj
      @LB-ye1fj 27 днів тому +15

      The F-117 was designed to absorb heat and distribute it across the body to avoid thermal detection. Also, it was designed in such a way to not only avoid radar detection, but also harder to see with your own eyes, if far away and at the correct angle. Stealth is technically a defense. The safest bomber is one that can’t be spotted in the first place.

    • @trentenidk8431
      @trentenidk8431 27 днів тому +1

      That cant even destroy a base :/

  • @bradleyrobinson8095
    @bradleyrobinson8095 27 днів тому +80

    i have a feeling the Nighthawk will shine in Air Simulator Battles, where it can actually use its stealth.

    • @GermaniumSteel
      @GermaniumSteel 26 днів тому +3

      It only has like 2000lbs bombs so not very useful against bases

    • @GermaniumSteel
      @GermaniumSteel 26 днів тому +2

      But I see your point , where it will have realistic stealth so you can’t really detect it on any radar unlike arcade or realistic battles

    • @michael_aagaard
      @michael_aagaard 23 дні тому +1

      @@GermaniumSteel There are things besides bases to bomb in air sim. Hopefully it'll get it's GBU-27s on the live server, and that they'll be good at blowing up ships.

    • @itmejac6945
      @itmejac6945 9 днів тому

      This is what I’m thinking, you’d be invisible

  • @jjkrayenhagen
    @jjkrayenhagen 27 днів тому +171

    I wonder if having the bomb bays open changes it's detectability. The only F-117 shot down was because the SAM operator turned it on at the exact moment the bomb bays were open.

  • @ziggy8190
    @ziggy8190 27 днів тому +28

    I hope this increases the Avro Vulcan’s chances now especially with this and the recent use of the model in the Brazil moments of valour video

    • @colbym7610
      @colbym7610 22 дні тому +1

      It drives me so insane that people don’t want more bombers because “they are useless”. Some people just enjoy flying their favorite planes!

    • @ziggy8190
      @ziggy8190 22 дні тому +1

      @ That’s my viewpoint too. I’d love to be able to fly the tin triangle!

    • @freezie4511
      @freezie4511 12 днів тому

      I know, it would be so good! I lived on an RAF base while I was younger so had the privilege of going to ALOT of air shows and was able to see the Vulcan a few times before it was retired.

  • @glamrockfoxy3962
    @glamrockfoxy3962 27 днів тому +10

    In about another two decades or more, it'll be paving the way for the stealth fighters we have today, for example, the raptor would be first to get in I think since it's the oldest, but the F 35 could come first too since it's being exported

  • @sanelushim
    @sanelushim 27 днів тому +38

    That turns better than the starfighters (f104s), and those do not turn.

    • @SerbijaSupreme
      @SerbijaSupreme 27 днів тому +5

      Spicy pencil doesn't need to turn

    • @getehrwolf6111
      @getehrwolf6111 27 днів тому +3

      Why y'all wt players want everything to turn? 😂

    • @ghOStDiVision790
      @ghOStDiVision790 27 днів тому

      These guys will see a bomber and expect it to turn like a fighter ​@@getehrwolf6111

    • @watershot5941
      @watershot5941 19 днів тому

      So they can bend over and fuk​@@getehrwolf6111

  • @Lcpl_Spartan
    @Lcpl_Spartan 27 днів тому +20

    tbh it feels like Gaijin has jumped the shark with this one.
    rather annoying that they go this far for content but wont finish the old bomber models. (still don't have cockpits)
    oh and i bet there will be constant arguments over the stealth mechanic.

    • @AHSValor
      @AHSValor 27 днів тому

      There's still constant arguments over how some aircraft don't have their historical bomb loads or types

    • @comandantegorrion7271
      @comandantegorrion7271 23 дні тому

      I still think that they should’ve just made a completely separate game for the post-World War II stuff, tbh.

  • @gojithecringe
    @gojithecringe 27 днів тому +18

    I hope you play it when it comes to the game to see how different will it be

    • @WeBeStronk
      @WeBeStronk  27 днів тому +5

      That's the plan!

    • @gojithecringe
      @gojithecringe 27 днів тому

      @@WeBeStronk now thats hype because it will be interesting to see the F-117 face off against stuff like F-86, F-104 and stuff like it in a full match

  • @ltcdefusion415
    @ltcdefusion415 27 днів тому +11

    10,000,000 GE is crazy

  • @bahadirmukan
    @bahadirmukan 27 днів тому +46

    What was that, what the hell was that?
    It went by like we were standing still!
    Blue leader to group, get off the ai-
    Last words of a Me 262 pilot who forced to fight F117s

    • @exmachina1405
      @exmachina1405 27 днів тому +5

      Until the Me 262 pilots realize that it doesnt have any offensive armament and then simply shoot it down

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 27 днів тому +1

      @@exmachina1405they go around the same speed and the 262s guns are horrid and it’s engines weak can’t this just run from it

    • @exmachina1405
      @exmachina1405 27 днів тому +1

      @@TinyBearTim it probably could but I'd wager it depends on altitude and a few other factors, and if it's the 262 with the boosters I'm probably putting money on that specific 262

    • @bahadirmukan
      @bahadirmukan 26 днів тому +1

      @@exmachina1405 yeah bro I compare F117 with C2-b variant. This thing should be 7.7.

    • @bahadirmukan
      @bahadirmukan 26 днів тому +1

      @@exmachina1405 what about 40 years of difference? I mean we want historical accuracy, those BR changes will make up for it:
      Me 262 (all) : 5.7
      Tiger (e): 4.0
      He 162 : 6.7
      Bf109 K-4: 5.0
      P51H : 7.3
      P51 D-30 : 5.7
      Me 163 (all) : 6.0
      A6M5 Ko : 4.7
      A6M2 : 3.3
      Ho 229 : 6.0
      Maus : 4.0
      G56 : 5.7
      F4u-4B : 6.0
      Ju 288 : 5.7
      B29A-BN : 6.0

  • @DaYemenball
    @DaYemenball 14 днів тому +1

    So for the longest time, I could only name the B-2, but I still knew the nighthk but only as the night hawk. It wasn’t until a year ago that I learned that the invisible flying cheese wedge was called the F-117.
    I love this thing!

  • @freezy4236
    @freezy4236 27 днів тому +8

    I think the f-117 is suppos to be use between 15,000 and 25,000 (4,500 to 7,600) mètres for a good stealth

    • @davidtv2224
      @davidtv2224 27 днів тому +6

      It takes like 8-10 mins to get to that altitude just tk drop 2 bombs and be out, it's horrendous, this plane was good, but irl, in game is shit

    • @borbduck
      @borbduck 26 днів тому

      Surprise surprise, a warthunder bomber doesn't spawn high enough for it to be useful, what a shocker! I never expected this!

  • @RadiantCataclysm
    @RadiantCataclysm 26 днів тому +4

    I don’t think that many people understand what stealth means, it’s not undetectable, it has limited detectability.

  • @ThatOneFrederick
    @ThatOneFrederick 21 день тому +1

    the most iconic stealth aircraft is the SR71 Blackbird

  • @royalty9025
    @royalty9025 26 днів тому +1

    Hey @WeBeStronk just a little tip for the gps bombs, you dont need to put the retical over the target at all because they will pitch up to hit the target unlike laser guided bombs so they can be dropped a significant amount of distance from the target point and still reach it, hope this helps! 👍👍

  • @wespatterson2830
    @wespatterson2830 27 днів тому +33

    They’re gonna have to give it missiles

    • @lantucker114
      @lantucker114 27 днів тому +15

      It’s a game at the end of the day and needs to be viable. Besides it can mount missiles, the military just didn’t do it. It could mount every munition in the American arsenal.

    • @andrewthomas8233
      @andrewthomas8233 26 днів тому +1

      It never had missiles irl. It was designated a fighter during the Cold War to trick the Russians.

    • @SomeOrdinaryJanitor
      @SomeOrdinaryJanitor 26 днів тому +6

      @@lantucker114 no it could not. as a matter of fact, there was a specific variant that was made FOR air to air ability. the Missiles that it could carry were only a test and even then it was more of an ad-hoc modification.

    • @cody1964
      @cody1964 26 днів тому +3

      Thats a terrible take

    • @Blossomy77
      @Blossomy77 26 днів тому +1

      This thing will be going against me 163's it does not need missiles

  • @JustinRice-ln4ql
    @JustinRice-ln4ql 20 днів тому +1

    It be perfect for ground realistic

  • @themonaclan
    @themonaclan 27 днів тому +1

    The funny thing is that this thing is gonna either encounter things with no radar or very weak radar so this stealth helps out a lot with those since it’s gonna be 10.0

  • @SIR_STuBz
    @SIR_STuBz 26 днів тому

    @1:52
    Looked away for a couple seconds and all i hear is
    "Look at it, its a flying triangle!!!"
    lost it😂, spilt my drink

  • @HMMR03
    @HMMR03 24 дні тому

    As an air sim player who's fav plane has been the F117 since I was a kid, this is a dream come true. been hard the entire 24 minutes of this video

  • @meanman6992
    @meanman6992 25 днів тому

    I personally think for air RB only friendlies should have the obvious tags. Enemies should only be visible, visually and only to other team mates if you target them and give a command to relay their location over radio. This would make the game play MUCH more realistic. Obviously have them show on radar that should go without saying but that way radar is actually useful far more in RB.

  • @The_gaming_guy-z7a
    @The_gaming_guy-z7a 15 днів тому

    its best use is gonna be precision targeting in night battles with the paveways. I don't see much of a use beyond that. It is a welcomed use case though since there isn't another plane like it, irl or in game

  • @ShuQ-
    @ShuQ- 13 днів тому

    17:10 that was me in the a4e early, i was looking at the plane cause it was so weird seeing a stealth aircraft that that br lol

  • @Maxwell_thecat143
    @Maxwell_thecat143 27 днів тому +6

    Can you play low tier helicopters pls?
    ITS PAIN

  • @dfwrailvideos
    @dfwrailvideos 27 днів тому +13

    Mk 24 Spitfires can see this thing. Crazy.

  • @CrazyChemistPL
    @CrazyChemistPL 25 днів тому

    I'm pretty sure the Nighthawk wasn't supersonic because it would require afterburners, and afterburners would 1) greatly increase thermal signature, 2) most likely mess up with the specially shaped engine nozzles of the F-117.
    I want the Handley Page Victor though.

  • @jacksonsmith6283
    @jacksonsmith6283 23 дні тому

    As a person who plays msfs and war thunder player that landing had me ascending I’ve never seen anything like it in the game

  • @williamwoznack5312
    @williamwoznack5312 26 днів тому

    WeBe: "Look at it! It's a triangle!"
    Me: *muffed angry aviation nerd noises*
    IT'S A *_HOPELESS DIAMOND_* , NOT A TRIANGLE

  • @CaptainChip501
    @CaptainChip501 24 дні тому

    1:57 When I was 3 or 4, one of these things flew really close to the ground at my house and looking back it probably was about to crash into the yard/me but pulled up in time. Must have been like 150-200 feet from the ground.

  • @FreeWorld937
    @FreeWorld937 26 днів тому

    you know whats better, it has forward facing guns and a rear turret. The wirraway which is why you should fly it

  • @thegreyostrich6559
    @thegreyostrich6559 23 дні тому

    i feel like the F-117 has just been added to test out stealth mechanics so they might be adding stuff like the f-22 in the future for example

  • @njorunmimisofficial
    @njorunmimisofficial 23 дні тому

    In my opinion I think that the Stealth Bomber will introduce a different Category of playstyle.
    F-35's and Stealth Modern Aircrafts and because this introduction this means that people or players will have the ability to increase the chances to get to higher tiers. with better output.
    For example:
    Taking out a Stealth Bomber plane is going to double maybe triple your Lions, This is because it is "Semi-Invisible" to Radar from the front. But Hitting this Aircraft is extremely difficult for even Modern Aircraft. IR Missiles are going to struggle as the Exhaust of the plane has a dispersion effect as it flies it still produces thrust... But that thrust is hyper cooled, This is also additionally to the B-2 Bomber. This is also going to be an extreme High Altitude bomber. This bomber is best used during Night operations due to the Dark paint making it practically invisible.
    As for gameplay... I am eager to wonder what they intend with Stealth capabilities. Due to the game modes they have it's 100% not going to be enjoyable. It doesn't take a Critic or a enthusiast to know that Gaijin is making a risky move... But on the upside their updated graphics and capabilities is going to be nice. One final thing I will say though.
    The maximum speed is 623 mph (1,003 km/h; 541 kn) at high altitude, the max rate of climb is 2,820 feet (860 m) per minute, and service ceiling is 43,000 to 45,000 feet (13,000 to 14,000 m).
    So this plane can climb pretty quickly and some Jet Bombers especially in the U.S.A side does not have this Relic... It's going to be interesting in Med-top tier.

  • @ajtheflame9180
    @ajtheflame9180 27 днів тому +2

    Actually, the first stealth aircraft was the fathers of Ka-50 players

  • @ThatSimoSims
    @ThatSimoSims 25 днів тому

    Would be interesting to see 3 friends formation flying this for a laugh!

  • @BaronVonDelta
    @BaronVonDelta 26 днів тому

    Absolutely agree on allowing "useless" plane and vehicles in WT. They've admitted as much when it comes to the Sturmtiger, Tog 2, and now this how they're a novelty and not as practical. Having it as squadron vehicle as opposed to grind event is also appreciated, players can unlock it at their leisure.
    As far as stealth aspect goes for the F-117 IRST and contrast locking missiles seem to ignore it head on while everything else can lock from behind. I can see future stealth aircraft posing an issue balance wise (stealth fighter vs non stealth fighters) but we know Gaijin will add them eventually, maybe in a "balanced" state like the Brimstone missiles.

  • @tenjedenpolak1
    @tenjedenpolak1 26 днів тому

    3:07 - WeBeStronk : "Ooh Yeaah" - bro became Vector for a second

  • @TheUnseenWaffle
    @TheUnseenWaffle 26 днів тому

    I just wanna say. I appreciate your videos.

  • @nokillkam-t7m
    @nokillkam-t7m 24 дні тому +3

    14:23 You had your bomb bay doors open so it ruins the stealth capabilities. Thats why he saw you mate.

  • @southpaw1364
    @southpaw1364 27 днів тому

    I’m definitely using this in GRB that’s for sure. I’m actually at this tier in tanks

  • @dmmino
    @dmmino 26 днів тому

    Great! Maybe you’ll be able to attack convoys in Air Sim EC with out being killed at 5k ft. 👍🏻

  • @Armless45
    @Armless45 26 днів тому +1

    From what I’ve seen it sounds like the perfect aircraft to grind US air

  • @SolarEmu716
    @SolarEmu716 26 днів тому

    At 14:00 you got sot down by the LAV AD. This is probably due to the fact you had your bomb bay open increasing your radar cross section, making you more visible.

    • @partyparrot168
      @partyparrot168 26 днів тому +2

      IR missiles have no problem shooting you down. The F-117 is all about the radar stealth

    • @SolarEmu716
      @SolarEmu716 26 днів тому

      @@partyparrot168 it also has IR reduction. But yeah it is mainly radar cross-section reduction at most AOE.

  • @andreluismouramaciel2828
    @andreluismouramaciel2828 25 днів тому

    I remember when i was a kid they used to say that it used alien technology from area 51 to build this XD

  • @DaYemenball
    @DaYemenball 14 днів тому

    I think if they put this thing at 10.0, maybe 9.3, it would be able to do its job and use its special ability.
    Most planes with radar at 9.3 and 10.0 aren’t the absolute best and you can achieve perfect stealth without facing the enemy by just flying low or in front of mountains.

  • @acha5667
    @acha5667 27 днів тому +2

    you sold by keeping the bomb bay doors open

  • @JulianGarcis-zg8ul
    @JulianGarcis-zg8ul 25 днів тому +1

    I wish the f 117 could carry mavericks

  • @jjkrayenhagen
    @jjkrayenhagen 27 днів тому +1

    I mean the wooden planes in WW2 like the Mossie were invisible to the radars of the time.

    • @AHSValor
      @AHSValor 27 днів тому

      Yes, but aircraft radar just isn't vaible in WT at that time

    • @Kendricklamarglazer17
      @Kendricklamarglazer17 25 днів тому

      ​@@AHSValorI think there are like 4 late ww2 aircraft in wt that have radar but yeah i think early ww2 radar shoild be more included

  • @thegamingpotato2815
    @thegamingpotato2815 27 днів тому

    I'm going to treat it like a M109 and bring it into top tier because that's what it was designed for. Plus the f-117 can prob hold its own unless it gets to close and gets gunned

  • @tylerjohn18yt29
    @tylerjohn18yt29 26 днів тому +1

    There is going to be hell if Gaijin doesn't get the Vulcan Howell correct

  • @loadfactorr
    @loadfactorr 10 днів тому

    i think the reason they could see u is cuz u had ur bomb doors open creating a signature

  • @Speedy.557
    @Speedy.557 24 дні тому +1

    Dev server?

  • @VolcanoQueen
    @VolcanoQueen 23 дні тому

    leaves bomb bay door open.
    gets shot down by missile.
    "that's not very stealthy" 🤨🙄

  • @thereturnofjon
    @thereturnofjon 26 днів тому

    i think the f-117 would be great for ground pounding or be near bombers and take out a base they couldnt

  • @BobbyRaySetliff2cuh
    @BobbyRaySetliff2cuh 23 дні тому

    Hear me out...
    Make another version with Air to air capabilities, for the current one make it a nuke bomber for night battles, also make it completely undetectable as a nuke bomber, meaning the only way to stop it is aim.

  • @SpiiiiiceeMAN
    @SpiiiiiceeMAN 25 днів тому

    Gaijin should just give it a fog, like if you try to lock on to it, all you see is a blur of static and your radar lock locking everywhere but the nighthawk.

  • @KodeKing-cc8pf
    @KodeKing-cc8pf 24 дні тому

    The important part about the F-117 is not the aircraft it self but the intrudoction of stealth in my opinion!

  • @aislingheld5816
    @aislingheld5816 23 дні тому

    i would assume an open bomb bay probably increases ur radar signature

  • @mirzamorza9115
    @mirzamorza9115 26 днів тому

    They can give it agm 65 maverick and harm missile and put it at 12-13 br range.

  • @banyanyas839
    @banyanyas839 26 днів тому

    I like how they put a plane that will do amazing in simulator, but they did fuck all to that game modes in the last 5 years

  • @opposingcritter
    @opposingcritter 27 днів тому +1

    Grinding the upgrades will be hell esp with those shitty starting bombs

  • @andrewdavis4065
    @andrewdavis4065 22 дні тому

    once the bomb bay opens, you lose all stealth until it closes. its the predecessor to the F22.

  • @jmirsp4z
    @jmirsp4z 27 днів тому +8

    gaijin give me my YF-23 premium here's the money... get on with it..

  • @Urssaff
    @Urssaff 26 днів тому

    The plane in any gamemode with markers is dead though in ground rb and sim it might be quite efficient

  • @botyi5518
    @botyi5518 25 днів тому

    quite interesting plane! weebe you should try the 1.3 do 17 z7 its very powerful in headons and i got a lot of kills with it

  • @andrewthomas8233
    @andrewthomas8233 26 днів тому

    It's clearly one of the coolest jets ever made hands down

  • @surgygamer4983
    @surgygamer4983 25 днів тому

    daaamn you should have more subs, +1

  • @7ThePrimagen
    @7ThePrimagen 26 днів тому

    yes webe, that is ourageously high packet loss
    it's what I deal with every day, and lookit me
    I turned out... fine XD

  • @EZB747
    @EZB747 27 днів тому

    Maybe spaceclimb and use as an airfield troller at the end of the

  • @Hammerpair
    @Hammerpair 26 днів тому

    gps guided bombs are a select target and cannot follow moving targets take laser guided instead

  • @watchingsometube
    @watchingsometube 25 днів тому

    But since you get a contrail above 6k anyway, it wont work in sim, everyone will just fly up and shoot you down. It will be easy pickings.

  • @hungryhedgehog4201
    @hungryhedgehog4201 24 дні тому

    one of the very few bombers with a cockpit...

  • @frost177st
    @frost177st 13 днів тому

    When are they going to make the blackbird next?😊

  • @Danokopia
    @Danokopia 18 днів тому

    It’s only real use will be in sim and high tier GRB imo.

  • @alphabro4189
    @alphabro4189 27 днів тому

    you already did a video to the strike eagle?

  • @catalinike
    @catalinike 23 дні тому

    it goes 1100 km , but gajin wants this to be ballanced

  • @soundsofexpressions3720
    @soundsofexpressions3720 20 днів тому

    When are we going to get the b52 strato fortresses

  • @BuffleMcDuffle
    @BuffleMcDuffle 27 днів тому

    Can you try playing the cannon Mustang next?

  • @Bandit1909
    @Bandit1909 27 днів тому

    I still think it's just a test plane for more stealth jets like Eurofighter,f-22, f-35, su-57 and maybe b-2. Yes the Eurofighter has a slight stealth capability from the front.

    • @aquilesca5tr0
      @aquilesca5tr0 27 днів тому +2

      since when do you think eurofighter and su57 are stealth? The eurofighter has just a system that makes it trim with aileronds instead of canards

    • @Bandit1909
      @Bandit1909 27 днів тому

      ​@@aquilesca5tr0 just Google it took me 2 minutes to find it and I said it had a slight stealth capability and not overall. It's not an f-22 or f-35

    • @ezye97
      @ezye97 27 днів тому +1

      He obviously meant stealth suite not the stealth plane itself, both su57 and euro fighter boast variety of stealth suits

    • @RhodesianSuperiority
      @RhodesianSuperiority 27 днів тому +1

      @@ezye97the euro fighter is not stealth in the slightest

    • @ezye97
      @ezye97 24 дні тому

      @@RhodesianSuperiority What part of ‘suites’ can you not understand….Stealth isn’t just obtuse angles and paint?

  • @ch1rpo
    @ch1rpo 26 днів тому

    The faster you go the more heat you create causing less stealth

  • @Domo6768
    @Domo6768 25 днів тому

    The only reason everyone remembers the hopeless diamond is because its been shot down. And it is has a fighter designation so lets not refer to it as a bomber as its classification by the USA AIR FORCE and USA Government as a fighter

  • @doktorbrot41
    @doktorbrot41 27 днів тому

    How is stelth supposed to work if you have a bomb shaft outside?

  • @Ikovr
    @Ikovr 22 дні тому

    New Dorito in town

  • @turtleman1466
    @turtleman1466 27 днів тому

    This aircraft should be given better stealth, as its not very effective as it stands and wouldn't even be able to bomb at all, however It would also be balanced by that fact that it is basically made of tissue paper and can't turn for shot and would be torn to bits by gunfire of likely any kind.

  • @SomeOrdinaryJanitor
    @SomeOrdinaryJanitor 26 днів тому

    it's 8.7 in AIR BATTLES, what's it's GRB br.

  • @bullitzfromabove5376
    @bullitzfromabove5376 26 днів тому

    Heat seeking missiles be like 🗿

  • @finnleykoons5485
    @finnleykoons5485 27 днів тому +2

    Day 8 of asking Webe to play the Xp 55

  • @hungryhedgehog4201
    @hungryhedgehog4201 24 дні тому

    Surprised the stealth coating isnt a module knowing gaijin....

  • @JusSkywalker
    @JusSkywalker 11 днів тому

    You sound just like stampy longheaf

  • @dakqwasant
    @dakqwasant 27 днів тому

    Can wait for the f-117 spam

  • @crazymonkey7291
    @crazymonkey7291 23 дні тому

    In real life if your bomb bay is open you’re easily seen by radar so that’s why the LAVAD saw you

  • @Goostave-sb9zb
    @Goostave-sb9zb 17 днів тому

    If we get the F-22 next year I’ll eat a shoe.

  • @STORMRACER09
    @STORMRACER09 25 днів тому

    War thunder, you got some explaining to do I just fed the snail $25 and I still have bad luck WTF.

  • @krypticpanda6670
    @krypticpanda6670 27 днів тому

    Are those runways longer too?

  • @spud4839
    @spud4839 27 днів тому +1

    It feels to new to be in the game tho

    • @Matteneer
      @Matteneer 26 днів тому

      Crazy thing is this plane was made operational around 41 years ago, and retired in 2008
      It feels new because of how advanced it was made back then, still being comparable to modern bomber designs now

  • @Tsirkon
    @Tsirkon 26 днів тому +8

    It just feels odd for this to be in 8.7, fighting along with aircrafts 30 years behind... Yes I get it, it's only carrying 2 bombs but still. Imagine a match of sabres and mig-15s, and then suddenly there's an F-117 stealth attack aircraft.

    • @mmmaiamm3078
      @mmmaiamm3078 25 днів тому +1

      Stealth attacking what? Its got no offensive armaments.

    • @StalkersAlt
      @StalkersAlt 25 днів тому +1

      also this happens often with ground battles, just used to it, this game isnt meant to be accurate to real life

    • @alexanderjones7769
      @alexanderjones7769 25 днів тому

      ​@StalkersAlt so what? Not everything needs to be competitive. This thing would arguably be better at a higher br than 8.7

    • @liamseven1604
      @liamseven1604 19 днів тому

      @@alexanderjones7769 definitely not, in air rb it would simply just die.

    • @alexanderjones7769
      @alexanderjones7769 19 днів тому

      @@liamseven1604 and...? So should we put all bombers and strike aircraft at 1.0 because they just die?

  • @lantucker114
    @lantucker114 27 днів тому +8

    It’s a game at the end of the day and needs to be viable. Besides it can mount missiles, the military just didn’t do it. It could mount every munition in the American arsenal.

  • @CZD31095
    @CZD31095 24 дні тому

    how do you have 10 mil ge? how to vid maybe? or yt shorts?

  • @ognjensarcevic8898
    @ognjensarcevic8898 27 днів тому

    Maybe don't open you bomb bay until your over the target