So the real issue is you blocking the public from trespassing on what is not actually a public sidewalk. Someone needs to educate the local ticket patrol on what is public vs private land.
The Berlin Wall was WITHIN East Berlin and they used to lodge formal complaints with the West Berlin authorities about the graffiti done to it by trespassers, so it's just as likely this guy owns the footpath - BUT where I think he may be falling foul is the KERB it is that section of 'East Berlin' he's perhaps 'trespassing' on and the krauts at the town hall don't like it
All it takes is money. The Council needs cash. Basically, they want you to purchase a variance. Now, you can offer to purchase a variance, or spend money taking it to court. The Courts also need money, so it can continue to pay for its expected lifestyle. Since all governments are in effect thieving "public" corporations, it's very likely that you will fight this obvious injustice in court, lose, all the while also causing the price of a variance to increase. Blood and money. Unless you have a high-ranking sponsor among the criminal classes of government, first, the government will take your money, and then it'll drain some blood out of your ass too, just for being uppity.
Why dont you either fence your property with a large gate or dig up the asphalt and mark your property with florescent paint or sound them a bill for land usage every time they step on your property?
Surely the pavement does not belong to you - if it did, you could put up a fence which would block pedestrians - and the same would apply to other landowners = pedestrians would have to walk in the road!
Virginia Fry he COULD put up a fence to the extent of his boundry. listen to the video again-he clearly says it is on his deed.that makes it his regardless of a fence or not. you are judging this on your ignorance/faulty hearing/or ignorance of prolerty rights and boundrys based on your own limited experience.
He specifically stated in the video that the property deed gives him ownership of the pavement. The only possible factor that might weigh against him is if there is an established "easement" or "public right of way" to use that pavement as a sidewalk. I'm not from the UK, but I know that in some other places, a piece of property you own can have an easement or right of way associated with it which restricts what you can do with it, even though you legally own it.
So the real issue is you blocking the public from trespassing on what is not actually a public sidewalk. Someone needs to educate the local ticket patrol on what is public vs private land.
simple you own it so withdraw any right of way across it they would soon sort it out
Get some legal action! If you've got proof you own it.. They'll never win!
Ok. This was nearly three years ago. What was the outcome?
It turned out the road wasn’t on his deeds therefore he didn’t actually own it.
The Berlin Wall was WITHIN East Berlin and they used to lodge formal complaints with the West Berlin authorities about the graffiti done to it by trespassers, so it's just as likely this guy owns the footpath - BUT where I think he may be falling foul is the KERB it is that section of 'East Berlin' he's perhaps 'trespassing' on and the krauts at the town hall don't like it
All it takes is money. The Council needs cash. Basically, they want you to purchase a variance. Now, you can offer to purchase a variance, or spend money taking it to court. The Courts also need money, so it can continue to pay for its expected lifestyle. Since all governments are in effect thieving "public" corporations, it's very likely that you will fight this obvious injustice in court, lose, all the while also causing the price of a variance to increase.
Blood and money. Unless you have a high-ranking sponsor among the criminal classes of government, first, the government will take your money, and then it'll drain some blood out of your ass too, just for being uppity.
Why dont you either fence your property with a large gate or dig up the asphalt and mark your property with florescent paint or sound them a bill for land usage every time they step on your property?
what the fuck.
Put a fence up simple
Move!
but yet you should NOT park on the pavement thats what roads are for
Hmmm
Surely the pavement does not belong to you - if it did, you could put up a fence which would block pedestrians - and the same would apply to other landowners = pedestrians would have to walk in the road!
Virginia Fry he COULD put up a fence to the extent of his boundry.
listen to the video again-he clearly says it is on his deed.that makes it his regardless of a fence or not.
you are judging this on your ignorance/faulty hearing/or ignorance of prolerty rights and boundrys based on your own limited experience.
Did you not watch the video knobend? He owns that sidewalk per his deed
He specifically stated in the video that the property deed gives him ownership of the pavement. The only possible factor that might weigh against him is if there is an established "easement" or "public right of way" to use that pavement as a sidewalk. I'm not from the UK, but I know that in some other places, a piece of property you own can have an easement or right of way associated with it which restricts what you can do with it, even though you legally own it.
nice
Guy is a bellend.