Greetings my friend, that was a absolutely stunning build, you are a true master of WWI aircraft, looking forward to the next build, best regards from Australia
Absolutely love that livery.. looks so sharp. I'm amazed how sturdy those wings are given how tiny the pins are/were. Tamiya cement does wonders at times, eh? Well done Oleg!
Good effort and nice result. The kit is far easier to decal (fuselage) if you leave the wings off until final assembly. You might want to try weathering after matt coat. It will avoid the issue of the washes and filters being repelled by the gloss finish. All the best 😊😊
I thought about decaling before gluing wings, but I had to use putty, sand it and that would be even more headache. Also, weathering should be done on a gloss surface, because it would be much harder to remove it from matt surface
Understood. The wings were bolted to the longerons of the fuselage and strengthened by the bracing to the cabane 'pyramid' they were not faired in to the fuselage. Incidentally, the gaps at the wing roots were put in to aid the pilots line of sight during landing. One of the characteristics of monoplanes was a higher landing speed. I probably use different materials for weathering, you get good results anyway 😊😊@@FlyingCircusModels
Another great build! However, I've always questioned the practice of filling the wing roots on Great War aircraft. Due to the manufacturing method of joining the wing to the fuselage, there would be distinct demarcation between the wing and fuselage and, in some cases, even a visible gap. Filling and sanding creates an incorrect, seamless transition between wing and fuselage. If the fit is too poor you can always fill it, then scribe a line and apply a panel line wash to give a realistic appearance of the joint. Is the AEG IV next in line?
Thanks, and great point. I agree that wings were removable, at the same time you always need to take into account the scale. The gap on the real plane was couple of mms and if you reduce it to 1/32 or 1/48 scale - you will need to fill the gap and sand it anyways. That's my thought. AEG will be next year for sure, but not he next one, I already started a new project ;-)
0:56 to 2:28 You can fill all the holes you made there with extrathin glue. There will be no sawdust because the glue will etch them, so the holes will look better. 🙂
Wonderful job and a stunning looking plane.....my M1C was very plain in comparison, basically PC12 upper and sky blue lower....nothing fancy at all. I had the same problem with the wing joint so ended up drilling out and replacing with thin tube...so much better. Did you use the PE attachments for the rigging? I ended up using my own....the kit's was so tiny it was useless. Thanks for another great series.
мем про котів і красівоє. Доре, роздумую над придбанням цього кіта, з вигляду ніби якісніший ніж роден та і по ціні досить демократично @@FlyingCircusModels
Greetings my friend, that was a absolutely stunning build, you are a true master of WWI aircraft, looking forward to the next build, best regards from Australia
Thank you very much
Awesome work again my friend. Looking forward to your next build
Thanks the new project will be soon
Very nicely done and finished, I enjoyed your video, thank you
Thank you
Beautiful finish my friend! Thanks for inspiring me on my own WW1 aircraft’s!
Thank you
Outstanding I have built the 1/48 scale Bristol but not the 1/32 scale one nice build well done . Steve U.K.
Thanks Steve
Podoba mi się jak wykonałeś ten ciekawy model Gratulacje !!!
Bardzo dziękuję
Another outstanding video. Stunning 😊
Thanks again!
As you know, I always look forward to your videos and learn much in terms of technique, finish and detail. Thank you! Make more soon when you can.
Thanks, will do!
Absolutely love that livery.. looks so sharp. I'm amazed how sturdy those wings are given how tiny the pins are/were. Tamiya cement does wonders at times, eh? Well done Oleg!
Thanks, Mark, agreed, wings are massive for those tiny pins, but it's all good
Really cool paint job. 🖌
Thanks 👍
Good effort and nice result. The kit is far easier to decal (fuselage) if you leave the wings off until final assembly. You might want to try weathering after matt coat. It will avoid the issue of the washes and filters being repelled by the gloss finish. All the best 😊😊
I thought about decaling before gluing wings, but I had to use putty, sand it and that would be even more headache. Also, weathering should be done on a gloss surface, because it would be much harder to remove it from matt surface
Understood. The wings were bolted to the longerons of the fuselage and strengthened by the bracing to the cabane 'pyramid' they were not faired in to the fuselage. Incidentally, the gaps at the wing roots were put in to aid the pilots line of sight during landing. One of the characteristics of monoplanes was a higher landing speed. I probably use different materials for weathering, you get good results anyway 😊😊@@FlyingCircusModels
Thanks!
Thank you so much for the support!!!
Looks great!
Thanks!
Another great build! However, I've always questioned the practice of filling the wing roots on Great War aircraft. Due to the manufacturing method of joining the wing to the fuselage, there would be distinct demarcation between the wing and fuselage and, in some cases, even a visible gap. Filling and sanding creates an incorrect, seamless transition between wing and fuselage. If the fit is too poor you can always fill it, then scribe a line and apply a panel line wash to give a realistic appearance of the joint. Is the AEG IV next in line?
Thanks, and great point. I agree that wings were removable, at the same time you always need to take into account the scale. The gap on the real plane was couple of mms and if you reduce it to 1/32 or 1/48 scale - you will need to fill the gap and sand it anyways. That's my thought. AEG will be next year for sure, but not he next one, I already started a new project ;-)
0:56 to 2:28 You can fill all the holes you made there with extrathin glue. There will be no sawdust because the glue will etch them, so the holes will look better. 🙂
Thanks, great idea
Thank you for video. On my opinion varnish too shine, may be satin or even matt would be better. Any way we are waiting your further projects)
Thanks for the feedback, I did cover the model with semi-gloss, but as usual, when you make final pictures - you will have a shine from lights.
Wonderful job and a stunning looking plane.....my M1C was very plain in comparison, basically PC12 upper and sky blue lower....nothing fancy at all. I had the same problem with the wing joint so ended up drilling out and replacing with thin tube...so much better. Did you use the PE attachments for the rigging? I ended up using my own....the kit's was so tiny it was useless. Thanks for another great series.
Thanks for sharing, I used Gaspatch anchor points, as you said PE details were useless
😆 P r o m o S M
рибов
Шта? :-)
мем про котів і красівоє. Доре, роздумую над придбанням цього кіта, з вигляду ніби якісніший ніж роден та і по ціні досить демократично @@FlyingCircusModels
перший раз таке чую, ги... Я б сказав, що він такий самий як і Роден, тільки що травло та смола є
As usual, a beautiful model coming from all the hardwork you put into it. Always inspired by your builds. 👍🏻😀