Soviet Union's other Moon Rocket: UR-700A
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 чер 2023
- The regular UR-700 had a payload capacity of 151 tons to Earth orbit, surpassing both the N1 (97 tons) and the American Saturn-5 (127 tons). Additionally, Chelomei's engineers developed a larger follow-on version called Skhema "A" (Configuration "A"), which incorporated nuclear engines. This configuration featured a solid-core nuclear reactor and increased the payload capacity to as much as 250 tons into Earth orbit.
The first two stages of the UR-700 with the "A" variant propulsion were similar to the regular UR-700. The six boosters in the first stage fed their own engines and simultaneously refueled the three boosters of the second stage. This ensured that the second stage had full tanks when it took over the powered ascent after the separation of the first stage.
The "atomic" version of the UR-700 included third and fourth stages developed from scratch, equipped with RO-31 nuclear engines (also known as RD-0411). These engines burned cryogenic liquid hydrogen or liquid methane and produced a thrust of 40 tons. The third stage featured seven RO-31 engines, while the fourth stage had three. The third stage could be responsible for sending a spacecraft on an escape trajectory from Earth orbit, while the fourth stage could perform a braking maneuver near the Moon or Mars. - Наука та технологія
Can't believe this channel doesn't have millions of followers.. your animations always blow me away!
same here. it looks like it's finally getting some attention, not long ago it seemed stuck at around 50k subscribers.
I’ve got a “doomsday scenario” rocket design. Basically, it’s that super Orion concept, except turned up to 11, with it using multiple nukes instead of just one, and with a much, much larger size and amount of boosters, alongside this, 12-24 sea dragon type boosters would be used alongside the nuclear bombs, expanding the speed range.
Which software is used to create these type of animations?
Another great animation! It only sinned at the end by using the Russian anthem instead of the Soviet anthem (same melody, but the lyrics are different). In Soviet-themed animations, it would be interesting if you used Soviet music that is associated with space. Soviet culture is very rich in that sense, and it would further enrich your work on the theme, instead of always using the Soviet anthem. There are several of them, which are classics (both in the USSR and worldwide) such as "Ya voz'mu etot bol'shoy mir" (I will take this big world) by Gennadiy Belov (music from the classic 1973 film "Moscow - Cassiopeia ") and the ultra popular "Trava u Doma" (Grass near home) by Zemlyane (a true 80's classic, an anthem of the cosmos!). Just suggestions from a fan who always follows this great channel. Always keep up the great work Hazegrayart!
Отличные советы! Всё в тему и по делу. Присоединяюсь))
Which software is used to create these type of animations??
Great sound design for the NTRs. Turbopumps and a low rumble.
Yeah, Hazegrayart is great at attention to detail like that.
This is how For All Mankind should’ve begun
Now this should have been in For all Mankind. Brilliantly done.
They reference a successor variant of the N-1, so I could see them use the UR-700 as that successor design.
@@FirstPassOfficial The UR-700 isn't quite the successor variant of the N-1 but a very different design. I've seen somewhere that there were plans to upgrade the N-1, but there has been little specific info available as far as I'm aware.
@@jmwoods190
I don't know if it's the best source of information about it, but look up the N-1 in the Astronautix site.
There were some reasonable, and some pretty extreme upgrades to the N-1 that were proposed.
The UR rockets were from a competing design bureau, and mostly got traction because after Korolev died his bureau struggled to solve lingering problems with their projects.
For All Mankind's timeline divergence point is that Korolev survived, fixed the N-1, and became a national hero, so the UR rockets ended up forgotten.
Смерть всему человечеству
Love your animations, what a incredible rocket.
You should do a video on the Energia family of rockets as well, those designs included the massive "Vulkan" moon rocket too.
Vulkan*
Nowadays this is important considering ULA’s Vulcan
I second this
Vulkan config was for Mars missions.
@@vitalegvitalegov привет!
@@vitalegvitalegov there were proposals for both the moon and mars utilising vulkan
This might be the most horrifying rocket design ever concieved!
Toxic hypergolic lower stages, nuclear upper stages.
If this thing blew up, it'd be a very, very bad day.
Amazing animation!
So Chernobyl if we strapped rockets full of poison to it?
The nuclear upper stage was a proposed variant only. Main version (the 151 ton payload) would only use hypergolics
Никогда не слышал, чтобы в СССР эта ракета рассматривалась как "ядерная". Это было слишком даже для Никиты Хрущева! 😝
@@bryanillenberg Still, pretty bad as-is. No wonder Korolev refused to work on it
@Hal Nordmann Korolev's personal fueds, personality, and Soviet power-politics between bureaus and directors probably had as much to do with it. And the Soviets tech and precision industry base wasn't up to making large engines, hypergolic fuel or not.
The N1's 30+ engines didn't do it in though. They had a massively better thrust/weight ratio and Specific Impulse than the American Rocketdyne F1 for the Saturn V. The tech for complex fluid dynamics simulation and modeling hydrostatic shocks from startup and shutdown didn't exist for anybody then. And the use of one-time pyrotechnic burst valves precluded lots of testing like Pad static-fires. And in the rush, mistakes like installing a first stage guidance unit upside-down didn't help any.
Considering how shoestring the rest of the Soviet Moon mission architecture was, they arguably needed that 150 tons to LEO. only 2 Cosmonauts, nothing like the Apollo computers, and the tiny margins of the one-man LK lander were "sketchy," to say the least.
“I'm going to the one place that hasn't been corrupted by Capitalism: SPACE!”
-Anatoly Cherdenko-
Lol
Damnit! You beat me to it!
The printed word loses so many hidden syllables.
Not to mention you really think the Russians can pull that off, there is no way in another life maybe
I don't think Capitalism will take long to corrupt space too.
Very good. I think the camera view from between the nuclear engines would have had some radiation artefacts, but good animation.
Nice looks like a better design than the N1
Not quite. Hypergolics in the lower stages and nuclear in the upper stages. Not exactly environment-friendly, especially in case of a failure.
I mean it would melt Central Asia but the Soviets were gonna do that anyway.
Somewhat better. But there's a lot of "unobtanium" tech for the Soviet Union of the late 60s & early 70s. Primarily the large first stage engines. The massive turbopumps and other tech details of the large engines would have been problematic, if not impossible, for the state of their precision industry. Using hypergolics or kerolox.
The proposed nuclear upper stages aren't as concerning, honestly. The incredibly hard, dense, and high-temperature refractory materials needed for an NTR go a long way to ensuring they're the one piece of hardware that will survive a catastrophic launch failure or explosion largely intact.
The operating temperatures of thousands of degrees, the pressures, and the velocity of gas moving at hypersonic speeds arguably are more strenuous than an explosion.
So, a launch failure scenario where an NTR of any competent design distributes fine dust/fallout of enriched U²³⁵ over a wide area is pretty unlikely.
@@andrew32155 Yeah, makes more sense to be worried about the thousands of tons of hypergolic fuels in the lower stages
Realy cool video, enjoyed watching that, the sound effects are awesome, and the animation is so good.
The actual name of those engines was RD-0411, "RO-31" is just (western?) code name.
As usual, nailed it! Great Video!!
Very good!!! Congratulations.
Now waiting for part 2.
Stunning, as always.
Now we know that the color of the exhaust is a SpaceX Starship not the same as that of the UR-700, exhaust color, reddish-orange.
It's because of the different fuel
Yes, hypergolic fuel typically gives an orange smoke. You can see this on Titan II launches.
@@JohnWilliamNowakalso pink on the upper stages for the NTRs
Could we get a video of Energia's Zenit boosters being reused ?
He did this. Energia II Uragan
@@Merku808 i think he means original booster reuse scheme. With landing legs, retrorockets and chutes
Great video!
You´re a true artist man !
although thats a very beautiful animation exhaust plume color is totally of UR-700 is basically Proton on super steroids with same engines on first stage - so color must be same - purple bluish not orange
Excellent work.
This boutta be lit 👀👀👀👀🔥🔥🔥🔥
I love Your videos. Excellent work. Regards.
Magnificent as usual
I look forward to the second part of this video
Спасибо за классное видео, tovarish!
Is that a TKS I see? I've always loved that thing, despite how impossible it would have been for the soviet economy to sustain it like soyuz.
More likely to be the LK-700 lunar lander. TKS was designed for LEO.
@@powderedash7495 LK-700? I'm not familiar with that design. Any similarity to the "regular" LK?
@@bryanillenberg Not at all- completely different design by a different man(Chelomei). The LK700 was to be a direct ascent lander(i.e. the whole craft lands on the lunar surface) that has a cone capsule like its Apollo counterpart.
@@jmwoods190 Thanks
@@powderedash7495 well, VA (manned capsule from TKS) was heavily redesigned early LK-700 concept.
эх, жаль, не дали Челомею разгуляться
In Soviet Union, Atoms move you!
Thats so fire❤💥🧡
Yiuuupi. My favorite flying Bobhal is rendering! 😍
wonderfully deadly machine, if anything i would have loved for them to just develop the nuclear part of the rocket for further testing.
Just beautiful…
AMAZINGNES!!!
Great video...👍
Which software is used to create these type of animationed videos?
@@myfactstime9590>>> If that question was addressed to me, I have no idea.
That thing could take the orchestra and choir all the way to the Moon and return it again safely so it could sing the Soviet national anthem all the way there and back.
Awsome can you do the UR-700M as well
You just answered my request!!!
отличная анимация! практически как настоящий запуск смотришь. спасибо за ваш труд! Челомей гений. его разработки , и те что были в космосе , и перспективные -тому доказательство.
nice
Although dangerous
Im genuinely wishing this flew
No wonder Korelev didn't want this to be a reality, Imagine the damage it would cause if it exploded at the launchpad
Под нее и космический корабль был разработан, при том с прямой посадкой.
С прямой в том смысле что не надо было делить космический корабль на лунный и командный модули?
Didn’t the USA made a nuclear moon rocket that was much bigger than the Saturn 5? The one that had I believe 5 stages and had between 15 to 20 engines?
Nuclear? Not that I heard. But there was the Saturn C-8 Nova. Named for eight F-1 engines on the first stage, in contrast to the Saturn V’s, well, five F-1 engines
This sounds like a nuclear N1.
But I think that’s the Nova rocket you think about.
@@oliwierkwiatkowski8817 That is what I am more thinking about.
@@jaypaint4855 There have been many post-Apollo Nova designs studied part from the Saturn/Nova C-8, and they varied widely in design. Some of them had up to 18-20 F-1 engines on giant 1st stages, some of them with nuclear upper stages, BUT none of them had 5 stages(though some smaller designs had 4).
@@jaypaint4855 I don't believe the Saturn V was named for the number of engines; it was based on the C-5, a paper rocket which originally had four F1 engines.
The C-8 is discussed in Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Astronautica, but it's not brought up in Stages to Saturn, possibly because it was a tentative proposal made obsolete by LOR.
That is a really Kerbal Rocket
Чёта на УР-700 не очень похожа (или я уже забыл, как выглядел проект, а уточнять лень)). Да и гимн в конце н есоветский , а уже новый российский. А так видео красивое. Короче, лайк!
Maravilloso ❤
And the Cosmonauts are never seen alive again!
Nice, but it never left the drawing bard..
Perhaps you should ad, this is a Kerbal space fantasy?
Which software is used to create these type of animationed videos?
blender, maybe after effects for the tape filter
Good show 😅😅
Хорошо пошла
UR-700S😦
Отлично!
Но есть пару моментов, которые немного выбиваются из всей этой красоты.
Первое- расположение советской символики на оконечности ускорителей ракеты. Они находятся внизу и им там делать- совершенно не чего. Символика- это нечто, что наносится на верхнюю часть ракеты - так что вот.
Второе - Гимн. Он в тему и вполне уместен, но это Гимн России. А поскольку у нас символика СССР, то и гимн должен быть той эпохи - со словами "...и Ленин великий нам путь озарил...". Понимаю, что в Америке они звучат одинаково, но всё дело в словах- такая тонкость, которая от вас ускользнула. Исправьте, пожалуйста.
Great!
But there are a couple of moments that stand out a little from all this beauty.
The first is the location of Soviet symbols on the tip of the rocket boosters. They are at the bottom and there is absolutely nothing for them to do there. Symbolism is something that is applied to the top of the rocket - so here it is.
The second is the Anthem. It is in the subject and quite appropriate, but it is the Anthem of Russia. And since we have the symbols of the USSR, then the anthem should be of that era - with the words "... and Lenin the great illuminated our path...". I understand that in America they sound the same, but it's all about the words - such a subtlety that escaped you. Please fix it.
What year was this insane thing designed? I mean it's brilliant in theory except the exhaust alone would have (likely) contravened the above ground nuclear test treaties put in place in the early 60s. (even the US nuclear powered cruise missile SLAM was abandoned for similar reasons (the emissions and the mission profile both pushed beyond the limits of MAD which would have caused all manner of mayhem in the arms race - which was already dealing with ABMs which fell into later treaties). Although SLAM's guidance systems (and more) were recycled into the first gen cruise missile put into service so it wasn't a total loss budget and case-use.
Source - my father who didn't work for Nintendo - but worked for Martin (before they became Martin Marietta), Douglas and others behind the Altas, the Titan II and the Nike Zeus (my fave of the 3 - insane flight profile on that one). It's one of many reasons why we all laughed at war depictions like 'the day after' (where people were shown stuck in cars in evacuation traffic). With 14 minutes to confirm inbounds and chain of command being top-level only - you'd never know what'd hit you if all hell broke loose. Best bet to find a barrier to gamma radiation pulses and the assorted heat and over-pressure shock - and if you still had a pulse after all that - get your ass underground unless you were upwind of the RAND simulation maps.
You DID check the RAND (or NCAR) jestream maps for the year didn't you? You didn't? Oh. Oh dear. Well ... that's gonna suck .. as in 'suck a lot' of strontium 90 into your lungs from exposure. Don't worry I'm sure you took iodine pills for your thyroid glands. You didn't? Well - don't worry about hair care products and long term plans - you're fine!
(such was the life of a 'cold-war kid' - we knew more about your future than you ever did - including how short it might be. Fun times! - and if you didn't hear about Able Archer in 1983 it's because it brought us closer to WWIII than the Cuban Missile Crisis - so ... best not to mention it)
*feel free to ask me anything about the above - I can bore the tits off you from all this useless data (yields, time to impact plus yield with topography, transonic signatures on launch (now called MaxQ)- ablative shields on ABMs (insanely cool design), megaton range from the Atlas to the MX / Peacekeeper MIRVS (plus the true nature of the MX that made it the coolest platform of the time - since it was orbital - not ballsistic) and more (Titan II held the record for single mt yield for a warhead - 9mt (or more). Fun reads for everyone else, I highly recommend two books for bedtime : the making of the atomic bomb' (won a pulizer) and 'Dark Sun' both by Richard Rhodes. Both are thicc - but fast reads and fascinating if you want deep-background on nukes (both Abomb and Hbomb - including the Soviet program and spy efforts). I still haven't seen a reader-friendly read on the various missile programs in a single volume. I may have to fix that personally - now that I'm semi-retired.
The Nike Zeus sounds interesting. What kind of zany and cursed flight profile did it have?
@@mariasirona1622 it was essentially transonic on LAUNCH - and shed most of its weight from ablative shielding in mere minutes. It also carried a 1mt warhead (although it could be dialed up to 3mt) to melt the inbounds Guidance systems if they weren't hit outright. (I need to double check the yields since my father worked on the flight profile and intercept programs specifically - even he was unaware that they carried a nuke payload until he took a job elsewhere in civil aviation - after a short detour for 2.5 years in Utah working with Morton Thiokol on the SRBs for the shuttle program - and that's another rabbit hole I can bore you with too). But going past MACH 5 in less than 120 seconds in one hell of a woosh for any platform. Staying on target and not cooking late 60s guidance packages on assent was quite the challenge. To say the least. If you want to see a live fire exercise, north of San Francisco, in the hills of Sausalito you'll find retired members of the crew that will scramble for the launch procedure from their decommissioned installation (highly recommended). It ranks right up there with the Titan II crews that man the Missile museum south of Tuscon AZ.
@@mgabrysSF very interesting! I can assure you are not boring me at all.
@@mariasirona1622 From one insomniac to another thank yew! BTW - the Titan II silo in AZ was used for a Star Trek movie, 'First Contact' - it's a fantastic tour and give you a real sense of scale and launch procedure which was much simpler than the Titan I silos (which were massive in comparison).
The Titan II was 'up close and personal' compared to the Minuteman systems used today (which are very remote from control center to vehicle staging). The neatest thing is the battery systems since they were assembled at launch. How do you keep a battery fresh for decades to a launch scenario? Simple - MAKE the battery when the keys are turned. The electrolytics were held in bags over the anodes which were then pierced and then filled the DC systems. Pretty clever idea really.
@@mgabrysSF this Star Trek fact i am nerdy enough to know! However i am not an insomniac, i am finnish (timezone UTC+2)
What would the moon lander have been?
LK-700
Mmmh Soviet moon landing at the low cost of vapouring Kazakstan.
Again and again
As per usual
even I not watch to the end
thumb is up immediatelly :)
F&E, Mustard......you guys have a competitor
👼 Анимация очень красивая, но не точная, такого космодрома у нас не было, ландшафт нарисован, по воспоминаниям людей, котрые никогда не были в СССР))), + плюс это гимн современной России, а не гимн СССР))), и конечно символика на ракете, в духе представления Голливуда, не хватает только медведя, и очень странно, что ракета не взорвалась))). Мне понравилось, особенно то, чего никогда не было..
😊 🙏 🌼
Как раз наоборот! Ландшафт вполне байконурский. Стартовая площадка прям копия от Н-1, об этом говорит и высоченная мачта обслуживания. Вот с гимном да, не попали. ) Ну а дизайн ракеты... Так ее и не было в железе. Дизайнер так увидел )
@@user-he3ok3iq6v 👼Без обид, но я знал о чём писал, а вы увидели всё, через призму, западного мира, извините за такое сравнение.. Это мультик, причём самого западного пошиба, и Байконур там, только в их фантазии, вы даже там не были, но уже сравнили мысленно, какое то ч/б фото, из 50х годов.
А знаете, это не важно, что я вам, тут пытаюсь доказать, каков смысл)))? Вы увидели, что увидели, это не плохо и не хрошо, это очевидно, что у многих людей, уже мозги по другому работают.. Прошли вас, прошли.
😊 🙏 🌼
@@olegverizhenko я этот Байконур вдоль и поперек излазил. Мне лучше знать. А все домыслы оставь себе.
@@user-he3ok3iq6v 👼 Оууу, так вы тоже персонаж из этого мультика))))), тогда ладно, даже извините, бро 😆👈!
😊 🙏 🌼
Стартовая площадка похожа на пл110 Байконура
😮
Incredible video, but the modern Russian anthem plays at the end, not the Soviet one.
Which software is used to create these type of animations?
You need SpaceX's Starship Vs Soviet UR-700A
Simply THE best. Hazegrey🤘🏻🌎🚀🌗
I'm not sure because they similar but Iy feel like you used modern russian anthem instead of soviet one
لماذا تسقط أجهزة الدفع رغم تجاوز حدود الجاذبية
Lost count of stages
Ngl the final part just made me stand 😂
Oh yeeah
Very cool looking design. Hope one day the Russians make a moon landing.
Why did you use the Russian Federation anthem in a video about the Soviet Union?
Потому что Россия доделает начатое Советским Союзом. Буржуи, трепещите! :)
A decade after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the music was adopted with new lyrics, again written by Mikhalkov, as the Russian national anthem.
@@isleifoterogarcia4478 still, it is incorrect to use post soviet lyrics for a video of a moment of history when the USSR was still around
@@Pedro1745 It was previously the regional anthem of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic from 1990 until 1991 (until 1990 it used the State Anthem of the Soviet Union). Unlike most national anthems, it had no official lyrics (although unofficial ones written for it were proposed, they were not adopted).
@@MrTaramka кто-то до сих пор ждет левого поворота от путинских олигархов?)
It is amazing how all of SpaceX tech has been copied or derived from the old soviet stuff! 😱😁🤪🤣👍👍🇺🇸
Bro will you make video on PSLV c52 rocket and GSLV Mark 3 rocket ??!
😮😮well ingormeti0n 😮😮😮
The Soviet anthem with Putin-era lyrics is anachronistic, otherwise great video!
У блин красиво... а сделаете...😮
Это не УР 700.
Пооекты атомных были, но чисто эскизные.
Опасно же.
Comically large Soyuz
Hypergolic fuels
Seeing the cloud of RFNA at launch makes me want to buy a good pair of running shoes. At least they won't have to worry about wildlife near the launch site I guess.
Hyperawesome fuels
@@davisdf3064indeed
But still very deadly!
Wrong anthem in the end. Russian, not Soviet. Otherwise superb video
Loved this, but LK-700 probably wouldn't need side blocks if launched on this rocket
Только мультик и остался от Ур700
Но проект ур-700 дальше бумаги не пошел
Это не "УР-700"!!!Автор,изучите тему!
I'm quite early
Для особо одарённых идиотов напишу : "1 - ая космическая скорость равна 7,9 км.сек.Это что бы выйти на орбиту вокруг Земли. Вторая равна 11,2 км.сек.Это что бы уйти с около земной орбиты на орбиту полёта к Луне. Такой тепловоз отправлять с планеты на Луну, тупость. Уже сейчас Россия может собрать на орбите станцию, загрузить всем и отправить её к Луне. Там будут до 10 спускаемых аппаратов и все необходимое для жизни на Луне
☝️🇷🇺🦾💪
😎🇷🇺❤️
гимн не настоящий :(
Как бы выйти на контакт с Иланом Маском , у нас есть технологии опережающие всё современные на сотню лет, готовы поделиться
A total máss at launch of 16,500 metric tonn. A and a 500 tonn to low earth Orbit what an amazing rocket
UR-700 - projeto de Chelomey.
Muito melhor do que o N-1...
Can we get a full animation of an entire N1 mission, landing and all? 🥺👉👈
not URSS anthem but Russia
What horrible rocket design, thank god it never happened