What the Apollo 11 Site Looks Like Today
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 гру 2022
- Get Exclusive NordVPN Deal Here: nordvpn.com/neovpn
Follow neo on social media:
Twitter: NeoExplains
Facebook: NeoExplains
Watch this video on Nebula:
nebula.tv/videos/neo-what-doe...
In this video, we will look at what the astronauts of Apollo 11 left behind. With the first people to step foot on the moon, NASA apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin having left the site, they also left behind different experiments including a seismometer, the laser lunar retroflector and commemorative items such as soviet medals and an apollo 1 mission patch. In this space video I am revisiting a significant historical site, Tranquility Base, that noone has has visited since. - Розваги
Ill never forget hearing my great grandma talk about how she had seen man go from a horse and buggy to landing on the moon. Thats pretty incredible
Same with my Grandfather bless his soul, he was an engineer and was so impressed by the moon landing, He used to tell me stories about seeing the first television in his neighbourhood and how they all went to their friends house down the road to watch the moon landing,, I'm, never forget his last words he told me "Stop shaking the ladder you little Shi..."
was she born in the 1800s? something like 1891
My grandma had a drinking problem too 😞
@@Valkron11 that’s why she worked at a brothel?
even tho she didnt see man landing on the moon.People are so dumb that they think proof of landing on the moon was shown on live tv.its easier to fool someone than convince them they have been fooled.
The fact that they left medals honoring cosmonauts is quite heartwarming.
Agreed 👍
do you think russia would have done the same had they won the race?
@@sandwichman100 the Cosmonauts MIGHT have....
@@sandwichman100 definitely not, russians hate everyone, including themselves
@@sandwichman100absolutely. Russians today or then aren't nearly as bigoted aS Americans are now.
I remember sitting in front of our black-and-white telly as a 9-year-old child and seeing this incredible landing being televised. literally blew my mind.
Do you still believe in Santa too?
Me too! I was 9 years old in 1969. Still have vivid memories of the moon landing. It was really mind boggling.
I hope not literally
Same age and TV here.
Unbelievable some people still believe we landed on the moon when we just crashed a lander on the lunar surface the other day! No human has ever ventured past low earth orbit because there is no way of dealing with space's radiation ie: van Allen belts or with the threat of a sudden solar storm/flare. It was a nice show Apollo, but is was all make-believe. Get a grip.
I watched the Apollo XI landing as a 10 year old Canadian schoolboy. When I visited the Kennedy Space Center, I chose some memorabilia to buy and bring home. One “must have” was the Apollo I mission patch. Never forget, RIP.
They died for a movie
Huh? Whatever you’re talking about, it’s pretty obscure. Explain.
@@johnspooner1403 it's pretty much self explanatory
@@nyeaglesfootballgarbagemen8346 - Nope. No it isn’t. It’s obtuse.
@@johnspooner1403 Oh right, you're frim Soviet Canuckistan
Your country is pretty slow
An alternate theory about the Apollo 11 flag goes as follows: After the flag blew over during Apollo 11's departure from the surface, the flags for the Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 missions were planted farther away from the lunar module and remained standing after the astronauts left. Those flags were almost certainly bleached out by the sun. With the Apollo 11 flag, however, it is possible that the same rocket exhaust that blew the flag over may have also covered it in lunar dust. If enough dust covered the flag to block most of sunlight, it's possible that the buried flag is the last one retaining it's original colors.
sounds very possible!
Later Apollo missions did plant the flag farther away to avoid what happened on Apollo 11. Great theory about the dust! I never thought about that!
How many pairs of spacesuit boot overlays still remain on the lunar surface
When the lunar capsule left the moon, it was on top of another rocket which stayed. It had the fuel for landing. So if the capsule took off, the exaust wouldn't have kicked up dust because the exaust would have hit the capsule that got left on the moon. Now about it being knocked over by the re-directed exaust I can't say because I don't know exactly how far away it was from the take off platform. But I assume that because there is less gravity and no atmosphere to speak of on the moon than there would be less resistance to slow down the exaust from the capsule.
Like your theory.
A lot of people don’t know how much respect the Russian and American space programs had/have for each other. The governments were competitive but not the space agencies
It is hard to compete for Fake Space that Don't exist 😂
WTF are you talking about, 1 russian died because of to pure oxygen did the Russians tell Americans NO that's why NASA lost 3 in fire inside capsule. No importaint life saving information was ever past between them. They were in a SPACE RACE ever heard that saying, the pilots might of had respect for each other but NASA was in a major competition with Russians they beat Americans in everything but the landing on the moon, why do you think so many Americans don't believe they landed on the moon when they claimed.
First satellite in space: Russians
First animal in space: dog Russians
First man in space: Russians
First man to return from space: Russians
First space walk: Russians
First women in space: Russians
First lost woman in space: Russians
First object on the moon: Russians
First man on moon: Americans?????
So why did I put question marks? Simple reely America couldn't get any rockets of the pad with out them blowing up, don't get me wrong Russia had many issues at the start too.
America couldn't get any Apollo rockets off the ground without them blowing up, then all of a sudden they are working perfectly and they are sending men to the moon in only short months later, OK maybe it was a glitch a easy fix but as so many have pointed out it seems very strange that the hardest task was done by America after so many issues and it went perfectly, well not really see NASA lost tapes on returning to earth these tapes were damaged when travelling through the radiation belt, also by radiation on the moon basically ruining the footage so they fixed it, but how they never went back to the moon at that point in time so how do you recover film on the moon.
They FAKED IT, oh I'm not talking about the moon landing, they got a movie set and retook the photos they had lost as well as some film they'd lost.
Now back when this happened you probably get shot for telling this, but it came out in the mid 80s, the smart people started to question and think well if they faked it to reposes the picture and film why couldn't they of faked the whole lot. Because of people coming up with that conclusion NASA went quiet again and its extremely hard to find evidence of what they did, hard but not impossible just need to know were to look.
But as far as friendship between NASA and Russian's in space race, it never happened until 1980s when they built the space station
Unfortunately the Russian space programme is part of the military, unlike the US...
Well done Amigo👍🦅
@JamieWex Okay, THAT is 100% a load of BS. The reason “most people don’t know” is because it doesn’t exist. The only thing the Russians care about is how much $$ they can extort from our mutual (NASA, ESA, etc.) Programs., and please, spare me the “It’s the Government” speech, because it isn’t.
The bastards not only doubled their Taxi Fare rate to the ISS after President Odumbass canned the Shuttle Program w/o first having a viable replacement vehicle, they were also several years behind schedule in delivering their ISS modules. All the Russians have ever “done” for us is cost us more money, headaches, and more problems. About the only thing the Russians have done right is NOT killing any of our Astronauts; yes, we’ve lost our share, but not in the horrific ways they have because of their stupidity. Even some of our Astronauts have passed on an ISS mission because they’d have to take a Russian vehicle both ways.
“Competitive”?? I Don’t THINK SO. “Respect”? 100% Pure Propaganda. Why? Because we still need public support, but that’s as far as it goes.
In 1981 I was visiting the National Bureau of Standards at Bolder Colorado known now as (NIST). While there I was taken to a lab that has telescopes that monitor the sun and moon. One of the researchers there said "you want to see something cool? ". While looking at screen from the lunar telescope, he flipped on a laser and illuminated retroreflectors from three of the lunar landing sites. An instrument panel also read out the distance from the scope to the moon. He was right it was very cool...
5 now as they located the 2 Russian rovers with Fench built retroreflectors.
@@DeputyNordburg
Six now (as of a few months ago on Chandrayaan-3). Or, even more if you include the ones that crashed and shattered into a million pieces.
Great 👍
was it possible to see the return red ? laser light with physical viewing through the telescope ? You hint yes but don't say so.
The monitors were black and white. (1981)
I was 11 at that time, followed the space program with the excitement of an 11 yo. One special memory that I have was my twin sisters we born the day after the landing. I couldn't go in to see my mom but her room had a window facing a patio, went to see her and she stood holding one of my sisters while in the background was a news broadcast of the men walking on the moon. That was awesome
We can all agree that the production quality and visuals of this video is simply incredible
I checked you out as well..your videos are pretty amazing
I can not agree.
@@salsa83 I agree with you not agreeing
@@David-kw6xp Thanks!..Hope you enjoyed
Why did you put (youtuber) in your channel name? Wouldn't that make it less professional?
Great job! Thanks from Russia. Everything related to the Apollo 11 flight is very close to me. In the 80s and 90s, I was very interested in the history of the development of the space programs of the USA and the USSR. In my collection there are articles from Soviet newspapers of the 60s and 70s about the flights of the ''Mercury'', ''Gemini'' and ''Apollo'' spacecraft, detailed from launch to landing. By the way, all the articles are very friendly and respectful. In 1994 I decided to write a letter to Neil Armstrong about my hobby and to my joy he personally replied to me by sending an autographed photo. Now it is our family heirloom, as well as letters from John Glenn and John Young - pioneers of space exploration. Good luck to everyone.
USA here, thanks for sharing that story ❤
@@TheRedRaven_ I sincerely thank you for your comment. Sergey, 62 years old. Saint Petersburg. Good luck.
Hello Sergei, Antoine here, from Switzerland! In the present difficult time between Russia and pretty much the rest of the world, I rejoice of your constructive and informative message. Congratulations on having been able to obtain those most precious souvenirs.
By the way, I first visited your beautiful home city when I was a young student... when it bore another name, back in July of 1975. Like it is for you, it does not make me a chick of the year! I went back later once, and to Moscow several times, as well as to a number of other places in Russia. My wife (who loves Russian's artists in general, but writers, painters and composers in particular) and I wanted to go back to St-Petersburgh for a few days of "cultural experience"... but... given the present events... this trip might have to be postponed for a long long time... for years certainly, decades perhaps!
@@st-ex8506 Thank you for the comment and for your memories. I do not agree with your statement that almost the whole world is against Russia now. And why do you consider it impossible for yourself to come to Russia for a few days?
@@sergei6572 Impossible it is not. Very difficult however it is. Even some Russian friends of mine, living in Switzerland, and now Swiss citizens, have decided to not visit her mother living in St-Petersburg, as they used to for Christmas. They seem to fear something… him being still a Russian citizen, of “mobilizable” age, and a former officer…
If my wife and I love many things in Russia, we absolutely condemn Russia’s behavior in Ukraine. All things we thought the “new” Russia was are being violated! We obviously know that it is not the will of all Russians, but the times are definitely not right for a visit!
I followed the Gemini and Apollo missions with avid interest, together with my dad when I was a kid. At age 8, I had read and studied the Apollo Lunar mission profile and also read lots of material on orbital mechanics and rocketry, so was able to explain it to the class when my science teacher asked, and was also proud to answer my dad's questions on the planned lunar voyages, how orbits work, etc. To me, that was a wonderful way to reciprocate my dad's kindness, care and patience in answering my endless questions about different kinds of engines and tools long before I reached the age of 8 years.
I also went to view lunar rock samples that were put on exhibit after the return of the Apollo 11 astronauts.
I would love to see, or even participate in, a trip to the Moon perhaps on SpaceX's Starship (currently under development), to land on a spot far enough from the Apollo 11 site -- to avoid damage to the site by rocket blast throwing up regolith during landing and launch -- then driving to the Apollo 11 landing site on a rover to view and film, but not touch, the artifacts left there so long ago. I would also be very honored to take an American flag with me to replace without touching (out of respect) the one knocked down by engine blast during departure of Apollo 11 ascent stage.
We all sat around and watched the landing in our home. I was 16. My Dad worked on the fuel cells that were on the Apollo spacecraft. A friend of mine’s Dad worked on the environmental pack they wore on the moon.
That was quite a summer. A few days before I dated a girl that is my wife.
Although it was not mentioned in the narration, I was pleased to see the ALSCC camera (Apollo Lunar Surface Closeup Camera), that was left behind. It's purpose was to take 3-D photos of the undisturbed surface of the moon. The film canister was then brought back to earth for processing.. I was involved in the development of the camera when I was employed at Kodak.
Great job! It worked perfectly! 👍🏻👨🚀
Who filmed the take-off from the Moon?
That camera on a pole
mhhmm then how'd the film get back ?.....ups?...being sarcastic i know the whole things a fraud.
@@alansharonpisarek1789 Like that movie, Capricorn One? Maybe! ;)
My dad was a radio man in the Navy during this time. He helped relay signals back to NASA and listened intently to the conversations. He was absolutely amazed. A young kid from a rural state getting to experience something so amazing.
He had no patience for landing deniers and got into argument with at least one person I remember. When he passed in 2020, I had to give the eulogy and I mentioned his experience doing this and mentioned that if there WERE a conspiracy about the landing, he never got his cut from the government to hush things up.
“As we all know, dad wouldn’t have shut up until he got his money.” Everyone laughed and it helped set the tone for the rest of the service.
Dad was proud he got to be part of this in a small way and I loved hearing the stories.
My father was also what was your father's name?
🤣🤣🤣 Yeah, because the magician lets everybody in on the secret of his trick.
There was enough of a signal delay for command to selectively exclude certain transmissions . Your dad was hearing the same "live" transmissions as everyone else.
@@John-ic9ov no.
@@John-ic9ov
Your reply is a non sequitur
We had passes to the new visitor center to watch the launch, but we couldn’t get close the entrance because of the millions of Americans trying to view the launch. A kind man offered to let my mom bring her son and daughter through his yard and sit on his sea wall on the Indian river to watch the launch on July 16th 1969.
I had moved my grandma’s TV into my bedroom (as she was away) and stayed up all night watching at the age of 12. Simply amazed that with all that 1960’s tech that they made it there and back safely.
1 was 12 too
Loved seeing this! I didn't know about the commemorative artifacts left behind. A wonderful human thing to do.
I'm curious if the 3D models are available to the public?
To leave all that medals and patches to celebrate the the ones who died to make this mission possible warms my heart ❤️
Dude.
Please.
If you believe that and get emotional about it, then I hope you've never been responsible for a child . . . or is Santa still real for 'em?!?
The patches may have been blown far away by the rocket blast when they left.
@@steverobertson6393even the Soviet appreciate the gesture, the goddamns USSR acknowledge it.
@@lesaber251 Unlikely as the accent stage blasted into the decent stage. And in vacuum, that dissipates very quickly. And even if they were, they are still on the moon.
Yeah... and all the bureaucrats and politicians got their names on there, too. Got to keep the funds flowing!
Interesting that the only equipment to keep operating was a mirror... probably cost a $1M or so.
Would be cool if we went back to this landing site to film a documentary about it, recording it with our high tech cameras of today. That would be amazing to watch.
Yea bud, it would be cool.
Why don't we?
How come we can't see the Apollo capsule up close at the Smithsonian anymore.
How come China hasn't gone?
Why did Russia never go?
. . .
It must be too hard. Technology and all.
@@steverobertson6393 I'm sure you have a "theory" about it...
@@midiprog2266 Ha ha!
Love that!
Taking pot shots from the cheap seats.
Do you have a chorus of similarly fated-in-life losers behind you?
That's how I picture it.
Here's how it works MidiProg, if you think you are smarter (and you do) then you need to demonstrate that in some way.
I probably do have a theory about "it", because I have lots of em cause I have thoughts.
Yea.
All the time.
I know, it sucks, but they just keep on comin!
Good luck, buddy.
@@JuanRivera-gc7fq Nah.
It can't.
If it could, it would.
The moon is too close for Hubble to get a good resolution, so no it can't.@@JuanRivera-gc7fq
After reading just a few comments I wonder how we still have any aluminum foil left on earth cause I have a feeling some of y’all have a 1960s bomb shelter stacked full of it
Well, just the amount used for hats around here may impact global supplies.
Watched as a 7 year old in extreme rapture. TV was grainy back then so everything looked about as good as you'd expect.
I watched the first moon landing with my grandfather on a little black and white television in a cabin in Gatlinburg, Tennessee. I will never forget that!
Nostalgia is a powerful drug. In the 1980s I watched Mickey Mouse with my parents on the tell-a-vision.
Was woken up by my dad to see it live here in England. I was Seven. I have never forgotten it.
You genuinely believe that we actually got to the moon with 1960’s technology?
@@bryannicholas2130 Yes, now shut up.
@@bryannicholas2130 Do you actually believe they couldn't have the technology in the 1960s? The automobile was invented in the late 1800s to early 1900s. People were not as stupid then as they are now.
I truly believe that the Apollo Program is the single most impressive feat of engineering ever performed by humans. The sheer amount of workforce, genius and technology this feat took to archive is nothing short of mesmerizing. Literally and figuratively the highest we've been as a species and it's a damn shame we're yet to return to our lovely neighbor.
Artemis is planing to make a 'base' of sorts... a mining facility to mine water, use solar power to break the water into Hydrogen and Oxygen, the basic chemicals in rocket feul... we're turning the moon into a gas station.
Western nations decided to devote all their resources to babysitting third world savages.
@@Cliffmchristyeah too bad we never been on the moon
@@dellyirving6702 Far too much evidence to prove otherwise, but keep drinking the apollo denial cult kool-aid.
@@Cliffmchrist so who seen the iss being built?
can you do more for all apollo landings?
or a video about "what if alexei leonov landed on the surfuce of the moon first and then (more importantly) what surfuce/eva actions will they do"?
like apollo 11 set up cctv camera, take some surfuce samples, set a mirror and seismometer etc
In 1969 I watched the full TV coverage live or close to it for the time here in Western Australia it was the 21st of July, I was given the day off school for me to watch the TV at home. I have slide film of the pictures taken on the Moon
It was faked.
You’re fake.
@@user-kb2th2om4e How can you fake a day off school???
The black & white TV camera was stowed on the descent stage in what we called the Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA). The crew could deploy the MESA prior to going down the ladder, so the TV could record Neil's first steps. The rock boxes were also stowed on the MESA, along with many tools to be used during the EVA. The Portable Life Support Sytem (PLSS) worn during the EVA's were discarded to make room inside the LM for the rock boxes to be brought back to earth. The Astronauts were not messy - every item left on the moon was pre-planned to ensure a safe liftoff in the LM ascent stage - every pound left on the moon gave us a little more run time for the LM ascent rocket engine.
very helpful comment....i was just thinking how they captured mans first steps on the moon after setting up a camera lol
The first thing you saw Neil do after going down the ladder was going over to the camera and disconnecting it to put farther out on a stand.
On Apollo 12 the astronaut tried to point it at the earth before putting it on the stand so we on earth could look at ourselves and got a blip of direct intense sunlight in the lens and fried it.
Did you notice the spacesuit boot overlays which were alleged to be tossed out of the lunar lander before lift off from the lunar surface
In one of those bubble tents, custom made with green screen flooring
@@adaptercrash Would be quite a feat green screen in the 60's
My Dad worked for Singer-Link maintaining the Apollo simulators. Prior to my 10th birthday he woke me up late in the evening and told me I needed to see history. We watched together and I loved him for it.
I was 7 when we went to the Moon. I sort of knew it was a big deal, but at that age, nothing seems impossible lol. We got off school early, Richard Nixon was speaking on the radio when I hopped in the car. I asked my mother what all the fuss was about, and she said it was history being made. Never forgotten that moment.
Same, mine, too.
My dad worked on crew that filmed the moon landings in a large warehouse. Don't believe the nasa lies. Research the alive challenger astronauts. They are still alive today, with the same names. Nasa can't be trusted.
Oh wow. my father worked for Singer-Link as well at Wright Patterson.. on the blue arm that spun up the Astronauts to create G forces.
I was 6 when man landed on the moon, was up as well watching history.
I wish I'd had a dad like you did. Don't get me started.
This is the first I've ever heard of the Toss Zone. That illustration was mind-blowing.
Appreciate the effort you put into this one.
Perhaps one day in the distant future, a museum will be created around this landing spot.
Probably will be Surrounded by Jeff Bezos owned mining rigs. Or a colony of billionaires and multi millionaires moon mansions owned by Elon Musk.
Certainly
Or they can just send it to the museum on Earth from the production studio where it was filmed
@@azzamatic4190 🤪
@@azzamatic4190 Lunar surface footage was TV; not film. You subhumans are getting tiresome.
Like the rest of the world, I was glued to my tv. Watching Armstrong come down that ladder is one of those things you don’t forget.
Glued to an electrical device viewing 'strangers' that Tell A Vision?
Did'nt your mom tell you not to listen to strangers?
@@SmedleyWarIsaRacket well what else do you think the Government would record it on? the internet?
I was 11 years old. I remember the picture being upside down and very fuzzy. We didn't have the best antenna.
Stanley Kubrick was the first man on the Moon. He had to direct the action.
Not even his style. Wrong. @@1pcfred
One more time, then. The photos of the Apollo landing sites taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter have been available online for over 10 years. Ahem.
Ahem.
There's photographs of Apollo 12 and 17. I have seen nothing of Apollo 11. I appreciate you actually responding with actual evidence though, I'm tired of people asking for evidence and getting nothing but religious and shaming language in return lol.
It can't be described how shameful and sad it is that people call humanity's greatest achievement fake.
😂
But you must understand that the video we just saw, is a CGI. Not real. In the same way, the television show in 1969, was fake.
@@markuslehtipuu3939 Dude of course video is a CGI isn't it obvious? It is a documentary and every single video on this channel is made by using CGI. Does anyone really think that this video was captured on a moon or the last video on this channel about nuke transportation depicted real nukes?
They also seem oblivious to the fact that there were 6 manned moon landings, not just the one they call faked. So, apparently the first one was not real, and the other 5 didn’t happen at all. Amazing.
American truth about apollo landing on the Moon = american truth about biological weapon in Iraque 2003.America creates its own truth!Opon your eyes and cure your ignorance!
Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins, RIP.
I remember seeing the mission on TV, remember Walter Cronkite saying quite a few times, "...if all goes well". It sure did!
The actors had a pretty nice trailer, and spent only 3 hours a day filming so it went fairly well I suppose
Walter Cronkite even did updates on Nazi Germany!!…
in TNO, the AI alternate timeline.😂😂
And under the gold foil wrapping, in the corner of one of the sides, is taped a photo of the daughter of one of the electricians who worked on the project. I worked with him back in the mid 90s and he told me.
I salute his daring craftiness.
If it recorded footage of the first steps on the moon, how did the camera get setup so far away?
Armstrong took it from the MESA (where it recorded the first steps) and mounted it to a tripod, and carried it to its final spot where it took video of the rest of the moonwalk.
@@rockethead7 That makes sense. You can tell in the footage that it's mounted on the craft. I didn't mean to imply Kubrick put it there.
It was filmed in a studio
Shhhhhhh.
Wow! Great CGI! And just the right content and length! Many thanks!
U rlly think they went live from space?
@@DaeJhuan "...went live from space?" Your question makes no sense. Did you even think through your question before posting text that makes no sense? Did you proofread your question before clicking "Reply?" If you did, then I don't know what "went live from space" is supposed to mean. If you want to edit your question so that it makes sense, I'll be glad to respond.
But just out of curiosity: Do you believe the Earth is flat?
Neil also left a piece of the *Wright Brothers* flyer *Kitty Hawk* to signify progress of mankind. Well aware of the historical significance.
Hahahaha wel that didn't age well, did it. Aircraft technology advanced rapidly over a short space of time, whereas Apollo stands as the singular, solitary event in which technology has gone in reverse. Think about that....the technical data, telemetry, video, all gone never to be repeated? The historical significance is massive, indeed.
But shall we remove the elephant from the room for a second.... the Van Allen radiation belts have never, and will never be passed by humans. Fact. Cheers.
@@deanhall6045 then how did the D.R.I. Laser Reflectors get placed up there ?? 🤔
@@waylonmccrae3546 get with it mate, they weren't put there by humans. Its easy to land anything on the moon, except humans. The Van Allen radiation belts kill humans. Probes and landers can get there, do you really think that humans put those reflectors there ? Really ?
@@waylonmccrae3546 there's zero, nil, absolutely no evidence of anyone ever being there, prove otherwise. I'll save you time, you can't. Cheers.
@@waylonmccrae3546 they weren't put there by humans. Fact.
I remember watching it live on TV every moment of it, this was a historic time indeed, a great achievement.
That legacy remains and always will do.
Leaving behind the remnants to be cleared up one day.
Human presence on the moon leading to further longer distance goals in years to come.
Great achievement? More like a great hoax!
I watched the Neal Armstrong step on the moon about 3 am EST. It was B&W but exciting event!
Excellent video, learned a lot from it. Thank You.
They also left a piece of the Wright Brothers' original airplane on the Moon.
Yeah, part of the fabric from the left wing! Really cool idea tbh, first ever powered flying machine making it all the way to the moon :)
Also on the mars helicopter. They better stop taking pieces or there will be nothing left!
Orville & Wilbur probably never imagined that pieces of their aircraft would travel to other worlds. But my guess is that bits of it will travel with astronauts to whatever other worlds humans visit@@sgauntt
I did not know that! So cool to honor the Wright Brothers that way!!!
Bro, the production quality is just astounding. Good job neo!
Keyword 'production' :-) ... all BS !
In Andy Weir's book "Artemis" the Apollo 11 site is a preserved historic site on the moon. It even has a Visitor Center. Visitors take a half hour "train" ride from the Lunar Base to visit it. Perhaps one day, that will be true.
Love how every single video showing the moon is all animated
Not all; there are films, pictures and video.
@@jaybee9269 not a single independent photo of anything allegedly left on the moon
@@maaruz1979 >> What?! Landing sites have been photographed by spacecraft of various nations. Not to mention it’s a silly belief to think the moon landings were faked. No one fakes thousands of engineering drawings!
@@jaybee9269 source? there are no photos of clearly visible landing gear allegedly left behind
@@maaruz1979 >> Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter images are probably the best. I shall not argue consensus reality with you…
I can't imagine those flags lasted more than a couple years up there. The UV is very intense and the nylon would break down much more quickly than here on earth
True about the UV. But there is no atmosphere, so no oxidation or micro-organisms to break down the fibres. There are LRO photos of the sites, where you can see the shadow from the flag move from one photo to another due to the angle of the sun changing. Here is a quote about what LRO found: "From the LROC images it is now certain that the American flags are still standing and casting shadows at all of the sites, except Apollo 11. Astronaut Buzz Aldrin reported that the flag was blown over by the exhaust from the ascent engine during liftoff of Apollo 11, and it looks like he was correct!" End of quote.
It has been speculated that the flags would lose its colors and be totally white now.
It’s in space it won’t break down lol
That’s because they ran to Walmart and bought a new one for the film set
Tru. Ever see what the sun does to plastic toys meant to be outside, and you see and feel the break down of plastics.
@@luv2bbq Walmart? The first one had just opened the following month!
I spent 4 years at Orroral Valley tracking station in Australia. Daily uploading of commands, and downloading data from ALSEP. A CSIRO team lased LRRR from their facility adjacent to Orroral.
Before they "lost" proof of telemetry?
@@swervedriver5260
They didn’t lose anything except a backup copy of the slow-scan TV tape. Sotheby’s actually auctioned a set of Apollo 11 tapes a few years back, nearly $2 million from memory..
@@stephenpage-murray7226
Tapes of....
@@stephenpage-murray7226 I'm confused. I thought the telemetry tapes were lost and that the Sotheby's tapes were copies made for broadcasting purposes. Quote: "Some of the media coverage leading up to Sotheby's sale conflated [Gary] George's tapes, which contain footage converted for TV broadcast, with the telemetry tapes that NASA was unable to find in a highly-publicized 2005 search. The confusion resulted in the space agency issuing a statement before the auction that said, in part, that the tapes up for bid "contain no material that hasn't been preserved at NASA."
@@clintflicker2645
Every single item js in the national archives. Look at several projects here on UA-cam that utilise the data.
I remember being a child watching the moon landing, I was fascinated and I feel privileged living that day.
And yet.. Some idiots still believe it wasn't real..
@@sinabarzyar5766 probably all woke
I was college age at the time of the landing. During the summer months there were 8-12 of us that would travel the state on weekends. One of trips was to Tri-Cites for the Atomic Cup which had hydroplanes race on the Columbia River. The PA system broadcasted the landing and 250,000 hydroplane fans erupted in cheers, hugs, and back pats. We hurried home after the final race and watched Armstrong step off the ladder and onto the moon. When I returned to college that fall, a friend showed me a photo he took of his TV screen of the first steps. I was in awe of his B&W 8x10. I wished I had done the same.
I remember sitting in my living room with my parents and siblings watching Neil Armstrong taking those first steps on the moon. I was 9 years old. And I am still as fascinated as I was then at the accomplishments that the astronauts and all the people that worked together to put a man on the moon. Thank you for sharing this with us.
Same here👍
I was 10 and I recall it the same way!
And I remember hearing all of Santa's reindeer in the Winter of 1984 right there up on the roof of my childhood home.
@@steverobertson6393 Funny watching you try to troll, but really everyone just thinks you're retarted.
Same here. I was 13 at the time.
It’s so cool that this vid was released during the 50 year anniversary of the Apollo 17 lunar stay. For those who don’t know, Apollo 17 was the final human mission to the moon. It carried former Navy fighter pilot Eugene Cernan and Geologist Harrison “Jack” Schmitt (the only geologist to walk on the moon.) The last human being to set foot on the moon was Gene Cernan on Dec 13, 1972 and the LM “Challanger” lifted off the moon on Dec 14 to rejoin Ronald Evans in the CM “America”. There’s a pretty cool video of the liftoff as seen by the Rover camera that I highly recommend you watch if you haven’t already seen.
They left a plaque on the Descent Stage similar to the one on Apollo 11. The one on 17 says: “Here Man completed his first explorations of the Moon. December 1972 A.D. May the spirit of peace in which we came be reflected in the lives of all mankind.” The last words spoken on the moon by Gene Cernan were “And as we leave the moon at Taurus-Littrow, we leave as we came... and God willing as we shall return... with Peace, and Hope, for all mankind.”
"Jack” Schmitt (the only geologist to walk on the moon.)" Yes, which was a big mistake, there should have been several geologists except perhaps on Apollo 11.
@@rigolonzinbrin Agreed. Actually, they were lucky to even have Schmitt. As it was, he had been scheduled for the cancelled Apollo 18 mission. They had to swap him out with Joe Engle.
"We shall return" ok when? It's been 50 damn years! This moon landing story is getting ridiculous.
@@pedrokantor3997 No one knew it would take that long. It’s great that you can accurately predict everything that’s going to happen in the next 50 years, including what humans will and won’t accomplish, but the majority of people can’t. You want to know why we haven’t returned? 6 words: Space Shuttle and Lack of funding.
@@aerospacematt9147 The longer it takes the less people will believe we've ever been there to begin with. How long can NASA keep this up 60 years? 70? 80? What if it becomes 100 years? You think the majority of people will believe the moon landing story by then? I don't have a crystal ball like you claim, I'm just massively disappointed that we haven't been on the moon in my lifetime and am starting to believe we never did. It just doesn't make sense. And the Russians haven't even tried despite sending the first satellite and humans to space? LOL!
Meanwhile radio telescopes on Earth have detected the Apollo landing sites. Optical telescopes on Earth have detected the laser reflectors at 3 Apollo sites, and optical telescopes on moon satellites from 3 countries have detected the Apollo landing sites and produced images.
Sources? Can they prove it?
@@anthonymoser4096 Naugolnaia, M. N.; Spangenberg, E. E.; Soboleva, N. S.; Fomin, V. A. Determination of selenographic coordinates of objects by RATAN-600. Pisma v Astronomicheskii Zhurnal, vol. 4, Dec. 1978, p. 562-565. (Soviet Astronomy Letters, vol. 4, Nov.-Dec. 1978, p. 302-303).
They did prove it.
I like to imagine a time far far in the future where this site is encased as a museum exhibit on the moon. Like possibly at the moon space port, where the most people will see it!
Thank you for this video, I really enjoyed it! I appreciate how slowly you "flew" over the area as you showed everything that was left on the moon. I can't take the super fast paced barrage of images videos that many ppl make these days. You get an A+ from me on this very interesting and nicely paced production!
You do know this video was nothing more than CGI and he could have put lois griffen bent over the luner module and Cleveland Brown pounding that ass like never b4. NASA has lied to you, your GOVT has lied to you and you lying to yourself if you believe this bullshit. Its all fake
Very good point, Sir.
It does make a huge difference.
Nice fake pics as one would expect?
@@rowdyyates4273 i made the photos, yes they are fake and also the sun isn't real, i made that too
@@rowdyyates4273 Leave, subhuman.
The Oxygen Purge Systems (OPS) that were attached to the top of the Portable Life Support System (PLSS) backpacks were removed and kept aboard Eagle during the ascent. This was done in case the astronauts had to go EVA to get back into the Command Module if there were an issue with the docking hatch. In later missions, the Command Module Pilot would use one of the OPS units to perform an EVA to retrieve film cartridges from the Service Module.
Michael, I worked for a year to get Rockwell to install handrails on both the LM and the Command Module, just to do what you mention - i.e. to go around outside in case the docking mechanisms, which must be removed from the tunnel to permit the crew to crawl back to the CSM from the LM, were damaged and could not be removed from the tunnel. We learned on Gemini that handrails were the simplest and most efficient way of manually controlling yourself during EVA. Since the Apollo spacecrafts were being designed and built during the Gemini program, their design was complete, and we had to convince every Apollo subsystem manager that our handrails wouldn't damage his system ! The first unmanned Apollo mission in earth orbit ended with the handrails on the command module re-entering in perfect shape, much to the approval of the swimmers in the water, who now had rails to hold onto when they swam up the the spacecraft to assist the crew in their exit. We tested them with the crew on Apollo 9 in earth orbit, and thankfully never had to use the in lunar orbit, since the docking hardware, a probe and a drogue, were easily removed by the crew on each of the 6 missions in which the LM and CSM docked in lunar orbit.
A fascinating insight. It's amazing that these days we can be getting input from a person with such first hand knowledge.
I'd never realised there was the option to go around the outside! I hadn't even put together the fact that both craft had two hatches.
The original idea was that the forward hatch would also be for docking too. Then the LM as the "active" spacecraft during rendezvous would just fly straight up to the CM and dock. If there was an issue, they could use the top hatch. But those docking adapters take up weight and it was decided to just make the forward hatch strictly for EVA.@@alanm8932
Thanks for sharing that! Another unsung hero! @@frankparker5760
@@alanm8932 There was a lot of back ups or redundancy on a mission of that scope. There had to be. Apollo 13 was proof of that.
Never thought about that one. Old vid. but thanks!
Nice work. Well done.
Outstanding video! I still get goosebumps 53 years after Apollo 11 blazed this fantastic trail. Seeing what was left by these brave, exceptional men is breathtaking when one considers what it took to get there and back. Hopefully, some time in the near future, we will be able to see first-hand the landing sites as they are. This video gives us a very good idea. Thank you.
Brave 🤣🤣🤣🤣
They’re all actors
I cannot believe u think the moon landings are real.
Go get mentally examined
@@SelfHealersNutrition what was so technologically unachievable that they had to fake it? They spent billions to develop the rocket and equipment to go there, as well as the astronauts only spent 1 hour in the van Allen belts on there way to the moon. But yeah sure it’s fake smh 🤦♂️ dumbass
@@zyzzbrah154 ur a fucking idiot
I want u to watch the videos and pictures
U can see the obvious cgi, it’s fake
The moon isn’t solid ground
@@zyzzbrah154 u can’t even leave low earth orbit
We never been back to the moon because we never went to begin
U should look at the flimsy space craft that supposedly took them there and back
It’s an impossible thing made into a Hollywood fantasy
All u believe is lies
Yes and the movie studio will be a landmark one day.
The beginning of your video says it all, a historical site no one has ever visited since- the site of the FIRST moon landing. Which also still marks man's greatest achievement in history as well. The footprints, the very first ones by man, and they are still there after all these years..I really enjoyed this content👍👍❤️.
Proverbs 14:12
There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.
Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
If God isn't real, why did I get visions of what is in the bible a day or so after giving my life fully to God? Why do the new 125 times zoom cameras show images of stars that look like crystal clear squiggling lines? Why have they now photographed lightning sprites that look like they are shooting off of a firmament ceiling that is described in the first 7 verses of the bible? Why have only Freemasons & Mormans (began by a Freemason) been to outer space? Why did Satanist Anton Lavey celebrate his death only to then slip away saying, "oh my, oh my, something's wrong"? Why does billionaire Elon Musk think we live in a video game?
Isaiah 65:12 Therefore will I number you to the sword, and ye shall all bow down to the slaughter: because when I called, ye did not answer; when I spake, ye did not hear; but did evil before mine eyes, and did choose that wherein I delighted not.
@@clickhereforshowittoothers2184 WTF are you talking about
@@rockinrobbie1985 Mark 16:15,16 15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
Don't let anybody trick you. The spirit world is a real thing. The billionaires of this world are into Old Testament Say -tan -eesm. It's not fun like they pretend on their Saturday Night Live shows and such. I gave my life fully to God and a day or so later got open eye visions of biblical things. I didn't even know it was from the bible so it's not like I thought those things up in my own mind.
@@clickhereforshowittoothers2184We call that the mountaintop experience. It goes away with time. It’s just your brain messing with you.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What about the little rover they drove around up there? That was a big deal to overlook.😮
On six landings they took three. But none on Apollo 11. Did you overlook that?
@@DeputyNordburgSo where it be
@@CashMoneyCaz da moon.
No "little rover" on the Apollo 11 mission! That was a big deal for you to overlook.
Absolute genius. Believing in a conspiracy without even looking into the simplest details. Truly speaks to your intelligence. Don't reply either and embarrass yourself.
very interesting video, I was not aware of all these objects that was left on the moon. How else did all that stuff get there, we left it there.
Thank you for making this video, I’m 62 years old and remember watching the landings on a 13” black & white TV Live! I’ve always wondered what became of all the things that were left behind! I’ve always thought that it would be great for someone someday to go back and retrieve all of those things and bring them back to earth including the LandRovers and then use them again or go to the moon and hook up some batteries to them and then use them! I think it’s possible!
Why cgi and not real pictures?
@@bighornriverpaul omg
@@bighornriverpaul Why CGI and not real pictures? Let me try and address that question. This is just a guess, a stab in the dark and only my personal view you understand... Its pure speculation on my part but, I assume 'NEO', this channels author, is just a UA-camr of limited financial means. I am quite sure that if this channels uploader had access to roughly $11.75 Billion he would have financed the development of a rocket propelled system that would have allowed him to transport an equally expensive remote control drone type camera device approximately 250,000 miles to the Moon and return it over the same distance to Earth. I further assume that this UA-camr would have figured a way to land the returning spacecraft in his back garden, as those aircraft carriers and the accompanying naval fleet that retrieve returning spacecraft in the mid Pacific Ocean are bloody expensive! I am sorry that the producer of this 9.31 minute UA-cam video didn't satisfy you by going just 'That Extra Mile', but I'm sure that now I have outlined the monetary constraints it would have imposed, why he/she opted for the CGI option.
No, it's not a TV remote which will start working after you swap batteries 😀, the equipments would have suffered significant decay.
@@DarkKnight-OO7 Public, look and listen these deceived souls, who try to go on a light ball (moon) to look for a beings they call "ALIENS". ALIENS - have we ever analysed this word? A LIES N S
A LIES - wait a minute, where to place the letter "N"? - for it seems to have no place.
Therefore what`s truth is:
Hey, public, look and listen these deceived souls, who try to go on a light ball (moon) to look for A LIES.
You surprise me every ti.e with the quality of your graphics i love them
Did you use blender?
A marvelous adventure. Can't imagine the experience!
I think it would be cool if the projected moon missions would include a landing near one of the Apollo lunar landers so the effects of time could be studied in detail.
6:30 can’t help but remember that heart-wrenching bracelet scene from “First Man”. It may have been a fictional scene but it’s still based upon the fact that Neil Armstrong went over the edge of that crater.
Karen Armstrong's bracelet.
That film got so much wrong it's a testament to corrupt revisionists.
Rubbish. AI just called all Apollo moon photos fake. All of them, your own AI. Fraudsters, Armstrong, Collins and especially Aldrin, they should be locked up now that the truth is out. Imagine that, your own AI calling the Chinese probe photos genuine, but Apollo's all fake.
Enjoy your awakening.
That’s one of the few moments I’ve ever actually teared up while watching a movie
Approximately five minutes before Armstrong took his first historic step, Aldrin handed Armstrong a white bag, full of detritus from food wrappers to containers of human waste. Armstrong dropped the jett bag to the surface, before even making the historic first step.
ironically, the very first photograph that Neil Armstrong took on the moon featured the garbage bag prominently in the foreground.
It’s unclear why Neil Armstrong caught the garbage bag on his Hasselblad camera, but it might have been a test picture of some sort. In any case, he realized his artistic mishap and kicked the bag under the Lunar Module.
The first thing humans do when arriving in another world is litter ..
.
That’s an interesting bit of Apollo history I was not aware of.
@@dansv1 Indeed and I think it says a lot about our relationship with Nature... AS11-4-5850 is the name of the first picture Neil Armstrong took during the Apollo 11 EVA, if you Google it, you'll see the trash bag.
@@Superjeanmarc really doubt the moon has a biosphere to suffer from littering.
Not that putting it in a landfill is somehow more healthy for nature either.
So technically someday someone can retrieve those 50 + year old turds?
They left their DNA there
The littering was my first thought. We humans litter everywhere we go. In this case necessary though
Landing on the moon was such an amazing feat. A combination of the technology created during WWII, the brilliance of that German rocket designer, an army of intelligent people, insane budgets, a dash of luck and sheer determination.
Most people have no idea how insane the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo budgets were. In the 60s, American GNP was greater than the sum of the next 12 richest nations, because we were the ONLY major power to come out of WWII with our infrastructure intact. The 4% of the annual budget that America spent on space was at least half the annual budget of any other nation, including the USSR.
@@marksprague1280 yes, exactly. When I visited Cape Canaveral I asked how the US achieved all these amazing things in space. The reply was "lots of money and lots of people!" But it was only possible with these insane budgets. That's why we haven't been back to the moon. It's not worth the cost since we've already been there. Hehe
@@visualonestudio Frankly, it makes no sense to spend a billion dollars to send two men on a 3 day sightseeing trip when the advances on robotics make it possible to send a probe that can perform the same functions indefinitely for a fraction of the cost. Before we send men to the moon and beyond, we need to be able to establish self-supporting habitats -- something that we have thus far been unable to do.
In decades to come, when/if colonies are established, this will be a major, MAJOR tourist attraction. I can see the merch in the store now: Apollo 11 coffee mugs, plushie astronauts, Revell plastic models of the craft, copies of the memorial artifacts, etc. Monetization possibilites are endless.
The moon is of no military or economic value. There will never be colonies unless that changes.
Um, you do know that all of that merchandise already exists, right?
@@rockethead7 Yeah, but it'll be purchased at the actual site
@@RamblinRick_ Sales tax on the moon will be prohibitive.
I find it very impressive that even though they were politically opposed at that time, the astronauts still had a sense of commonality with the astronauts of the other nation. This can also be seen, for example, in the fact that not only a medal for the Apollo 1 astronauts, but also medals for Gagarin and Komarov were left on the moon to commemorate all those who gave their lives for space exploration. And I'm sure the Russians also have similar respect for their American colleagues.
There’s also the Fallen Astronaut tribute left by the Apollo 15 crew. Small sculpture and a plague naming all astronauts who had died in the pursuit.
There’s a few names missing as we hadn’t learned about them yet though
We only "hate" other countries because we are told to through propaganda.
they never went to the moon.. look at their expressions at the first press conference, it was like Christmas day and Santa didn't leave them anything but a lump of coal
You know it was all Faked right ?
You people need to stop drinking there Kool aid
This was extremely cool. Thank you for bringing this. Artwork outstanding. Very well put together and laid out. Happy Travels!
I believe the plaque was farther down on the gear leg. About eye level when standing on the pad. Behind the first or second ladder rung I believe.
04:18 The Lunar Laser Retroreflector was featured on an episode of American sitcom "The Big Bang Theory".
A big factor that they didn't capture in the video is that the large door on the bottom left side of the LM should be open. That was called the MESA. They had experiments, equipment and the camera that broadcast Neil's first step on the moon in there. Later they moved the camera onto the tripod set further away, so that we and mission control could watch both astronauts work on the moon.
Hey why don’t you have a whinge ?
Right. Okay. Sure.
Moonlanding is fake. Wakey Wakey
LOL
The live video was an incredible Public Relations coup. But the real reason for the live video was to allow mission control to observe the mission and get the astronauts to do more in the little time they had. Collect more moon rocks, set up experiment packages more precisely etc. A team of geologists could observe and direct which samples to collect and which to photograph for example.
This video brings back warm, exciting memories! I remember watching Neil Armstrong going down that ladder to the Moon's surface, and then the liftoff from the Moon from an old black-and-white TV set. The video quality was quite grainy, and the exhaust from the liftoff blew a lot more dust than depicted in this video. Didn't know until decades later that they put a mirror on the Moon during that mission.
it was on tv it must be true.its easier to fool someone than convince them they have been fooled.sorry but you didnt watch a live feed from the moon dummy.why arent their live feeds now or ever since ?
That's because they didn't mention it until decades later. That is when it occurred to them that if there was a mirror placed on the moon it would be proof they went. All the while they know no mirror is required to reflect a laser from the moon....
@@kevinh891 Thanks for demonstrating your total ignorance. You`ve just made a fool of yourself. So simple to research this. But you aren`t intelligent enough to do so. ASTOUNDING!
@@baneverything5580 Dude they can't even land on the moon now!!!!!
@@kevinh891 It must be horrifying to live with such sub par brain function. Go watch some more clickbait videos by scammers like Bart Sibrel. Attempting to study and understand the widely available Apollo Mission scientific data is pointless with absolutely no education in basic science, photography, or any understanding of simple radio theory. Any moderately intelligent person can 100% prove we landed on the moon in under 30 minutes unless you claim the moon mapping and pictures of the landing sites taken by other nations are faked too.
Every single ridiculous claim made by the moon hoax crowd has been thoroughly debunked in multiple ways. Oddly enough no HAM radio operators question how NASA communicated with the astronauts on the moon, or how a simple phone call from Nixon was patched into a radio network, and no photographers make hundreds of videos making wild claims about the pictures the astronauts took, and no scientists are ranting and raving and confused about how it was done. I wonder why this is?
Very nice work
It's amazing to me that many older Americans at that time, like my grandfather, didn't believe we really landed on the moon.
Conspiracy theory isn't new. Bigfoot, Trolls under bridges...
It's amazing that some people could have watched the broadcast and looked up at the moon, saying, "There's *people* there *right now* "
What's even more amazing is that people actually believed we landed men on the moon.
@@salvation4all313 at last someone in the comment section that is not deluded
@@beyondnow1600 they are *literally* deluded BY definition
That's exactly what my brothers and I did! We went out to our backyard that night and said that!
@@Waldenpunk Wow, that must have actually been awesome, I wish I could've been alive then to see that.
Wouldn't it be funny if Armstrong went to the little west crater and saw beer cans at the bottom of the crater? Now that would be a discovery!
@@kevb8983 That was my first thought Aussies on the moon.
It was.. Coca-Cola bottle ..google it..
Excellent video!
Nice contraption
That thing couldn't send a moon pebble back to earth
My father was 28 years old when the moon landing happened, and I’ll be in my 20’s when we go back for a second time. I am excited for all the wonderful advancements in space flight that are to come.
So your dad was in his sixties when you were born?
@@kenotube3160 61
Ha ha ha, you're not gonna be in your 20's when "go back"
How much ya wanna bet?
I'm down for a DM and a legally binding contract.
You in?
No jokes.
I can bet the house, the ranch, the trucks.
What are you willing to put up?
@@steverobertson6393 I’ll bet $1,000 USD that humans land on the moon before the I turn 30.
@@tomblaise Humans on the moon. Let's do this.
I'll take your money.
We'll run it thru my attorney.
Before you sign anything, google the "Van Allen Belts".
It's not right taking your money because you're a good a trusting person who fell for the lies of scumbags. This isn't your fault.
Good people get fooled much more easily than dirtbags like me.
Still, I'm in.
Respect on your fast reply.
Good man!
It's incredible that no real images of the landing sites exist. It's all depicted in CGI
Understandable, since there are no cameras closer than the orbiting observatories above the moon's surface.
NASA took some really nice real images of the landing sites on film back in the late 60s and early 70s. But since then it's been digital. I fully support the moon hoax people sending their own missions to check on NASA. Are you involved in that effort?
@@bradleyrex2968Oh you don't say
There are lots of 'pictures' of Bigfoot, the Lock Ness monster,the Abominable Snowman, Dementia Joe voters, etc
@@nyeaglesfootballgarbagemen8346 Well I typed it more than said it. But naming other conspiracy theories is a classic way to deflect. Its a variation on a straw man argument. Good job.
@@bradleyrex2968 Way to parrot a hackneyed phrase
I took logic and philosophy courses at a well known university, how about you
You don't wish to debate me, kid -- I'll make you look dumber than you already are
One day, our human civilization will revisit this amazing site.
It is truly amazing what those brave men accomplished.
Yes they accomplished a fake moon landing.
LOL, incredible, isn't it?
@@squarerootof2yeah... almost unbelievable
@@squarerootof2 Please leave, subhuman. The humans are talking.
@@user-ur9xy6ow3i Please leave, subhuman. The humans are talking.
I watched Apollo 11 land on the moon. I was 7 years old and was enthralled by it all.
I heard the famous words . It was supposed to come out that's one small step( for a) man...one giant leap for mankind.
You watched a lovely movie and believed it was real.
@@dimitar297at this point, I don’t even know if people like you actually believe this shit or it’s just a troll looking for a reaction
@@dimitar297 How sad that you are unable to appreciate the achievements of a nation.
@@phildavenport4150 go ahead you celebrate Agent Orange next, same era.
@@dimitar297 Any other irrelevancies you'd like to add?
Thank for informing 😊
Of what, a hoax? 😂🤣🤣🤣
@@tommytimmons9932Get off youtube, ai bot
We can (and do) bounce lasers off of the retroreflectors even now. Those retroreflectors didn’t get there by magic.
Lighting was wrong in this re-creation. The sun was actually behind them, slightly to their left. That was by design in order that Armstrong and Aldrin wouldn't be blinded by sunlight while landing (and liftoff).
Did I miss something? When did he say that he was attempting to show the site at the same time in the lunar day that the astronauts were there?
I know an extraordinary video when I see one and this is definitely one of them!
I remember seeing the moon landing in a b/w tv in a restaurant in some beach town in Scotland. My father bought the Daily Telegraph. I still have that issue with me.
Amazing info!
What GREAT information. Thank you for leaving your sponsor's plug to the end of the video.
Wow, it's really fascinating to think that every time we look up at the moon, we are looking at everything that was left behind. Awesome video! One cool thing I noticed too was how it was shot all as one continuous take, really felt like we were along for the ride taking a tour of the moon. The visuals are out of this world, thanks for the great content!
Nothing is up there! If it were, we could see it from here with a powerful telescope.
@@danhumphrey5755 I'm going to guess you've never used a telescope, and have no idea how far away the moon is... Why are you even watching this video?
You don't need a telescope, all you need is just to squint really hard ;)
@@danhumphrey5755 I'm sure you have tried it with your "powerful telescope"!
I find it more impressive that me and my daughter live 150 miles apart and we can't see each other, yet we can both look up and see the moon which is 230thousand miles away 😮
Very nice video. I don't think I've heard about the Gagarin and Korolyov medals, that was a very estimable idea, I like it.
They left Gagarin and Komarov (Another cosmonaut who died in accident) medals, not Korolyov
I'm vewy pwoud of de astwonauts and I'm vewy happy dey made it safely back to erf.
People that dont believe the moon landing im sure were the same kind of people that doubted there was a "New world" back when we were exploring the earth
Still amazes me that with 1960s technology NASA IN 9 years from not even having a rocket , that they managed to get a man on the moon .
Already have, called "SLS"...
What is even more amazing is the fact that here we are. Over 50 years later. With computers thousands of times more powerful. And all our modern tech. We still can't land on the moon. And even stranger than that. Is the fact that NOBODY QUESTIONS IT!!!!!!!!
@@kevinh891 Is there any use?
@@sonnylatchstring No. People believe what they are told...
The main tech was rocketry, and it did take them a few years, but they didn't start from scratch. A lot of things were actually very advanced in the 1960s.
Consider:
* The crewed air speed record set by the X-15 in 1967 (4,520 miles per hour) not only remains unbeaten today, no modern plane even comes close to that speed.
* The Concorde, which commenced regular passenger service in the 1970s, was capable of traveling at twice the speed of sound. Today, no passenger plane can even reach 1x the speed of sound.
* The Saturn V rocket which was used for the Apollo missions was, until last month, the largest, most powerful rocket ever launched into space. On November 15th, 2022, it was finally superseded by the SLS, which is only _15%_ more powerful.
* The crewed bathyscaphe _Trieste_ descended to nearly 7 miles below the surface of the ocean in 1960. Only one other craft has ever gone deeper (and by only 56 feet)!
They didn't have snapchat back then, but computer tech isn't what gets you to the Moon, rockets do (and a LOT of money - they spent WAY more than the US budget allots for such endeavours now).
How did they get the camera set up on the moon before anyone stepped foot on the moon to set up the camera? I'm not a denier. I just always wondered about that.
Then simply google search 'Apollo descent stage MESA bay, Westinghouse camera, Armstrong ladder'. Or 'How we saw Armstrong's first steps' from the National Air and Space Museum.
I am really curious who claimed they did.
When the camera was shooting the first steps it was attached to the lander. Selfie stick level technology. After the first steps they moved the camera.
There was a lever on the platform outside the LM hatch, Armstrong pulled it which deployed a camera that took the pics of him coming down the ladder. All the remaining shots were taken either from Armstrongs suit camera or a stationary camera they set up.
5:53 I believe 12 cameras were left, but this is definitely not a representation of the camera that filmed Armstrong's first steps. That camera was mounted to an arm in the decent module, which makes sense, since who would be there to set up a tripod for Armstrong? It's my understanding the camera that filmed his first steps stated connected to the landing module arm, with the landing module.
The video camera that shot Armstrong's first steps ran continuously for 3+ hours. It was mounted to the MESA, a swing out storage system on the side of the spacecraft that Armstrong opened and lowered with a tape. After Armstrong descends, he removes the camera (still running) attaches it to a tripod, and walks it out about 30 feet away from the lander. Houston instructs him to aim it in different directions and this ends with the camera pointed at the lander. The position of the camera remains the same until departure.
This video is about how things were left, it does not delve into the arrival of the camera, or the first steps.
If you want to see the above happening, "Historic Apollo 11 Moonwalk Footage" is one video here on YT.
Great comments Ranstone & Tex. Very sad how this video states THAT camera is what captured the 1st steps on the Moon. Huge mis-take.
I love this channel so much, I thought that it was inactive for a while. Great video Neo, hope to see more Great videos in the future!
My 1st cousin twice removed was Neil Armstrong I sadly never got to meet him or talk to him but I always love hearing stuff about the moon because of him the only person in my family who got to meet him was my aunt who got a signed photo of him saying "From a cousin to a cousin"
That's really cool man :D
wow great
you should be famous
@@dextynlabelle9326 maybe he would removed once but twice
@@dextynlabelle9326 if he would removed once yes but twice