Kinda biased but have to respect for creating such video it must have taken a lot of time and effort to built the idea and script it and making it look real. I would like to know how you guys make such video. Good work.
I want to point out one mistake. JASDF and RoKAF aircraft would have gotten into the air once air defenses detect and intercepted many missiles. Then there's naval ships with AEGIS and a few American air defenses as well.
The JMSDF also operates SM-3 Block IIA, which are very lethal ship launched BMD missiles, as well as SM-6 very long SAM. The 120 Ballistic Missile is unlikely to get through the Korean and Japanese BMD system. It can't even get through Taiwanese BMD systems
The proof of such is claim is from what real world experience? Two things we know, Ballistic missiles have been tested numerous time in battle. They are fired and arrive at or near their targets. Its a simple fact. The second thing is defense systems which have been designed to stop Ballistic Missiles have failed time and again to intercept ballistic missiles. Real world facts. Gulf war Scuds had no problem getting past patriots, actually not a single intercept. In Saudi Arabia Patriot pac 3 failed to stop Tochkas and Houthi Fajir 5... In Ukraine you can watch as KH47 defeats patriot again. In Iraq the Iranian Fataha BM defeated Patriot as well as short range sam and phalynx to hit american bases. There is no current system that is fielded that has any real world record of successful intercepts of a BM. Let alone a massed attack. Including sm3 and sm6, neither of which have been proven to work in a real world situation/combat. all historical data suggests that the BM would be the clear winner.
You know I realized something recently, the HHQ-9B has a quoted range of about 250km, and is meant to be the cutting edge for China, but the US' SM-2 ER Blk IV from 1999 has a range of 370km... and, the US Arleigh Burke has 96 missile cells while the standard Type 052D only has 64, some of which are reserved for anti ship/land attack missiles...
Although the concept of a large naval battle such as this is totally within the scopes of naval warfare, betting the Koreans and Japanese to fight the Chinese would be far away from reality. The ROKN and JMSDF are oriented on coastal defense rather than moving into open water. This is why JGSDF and ROKA operates ground-based anti-ship missiles.
5:36 The Japanese Maritime Defence Force probably remembered that China always loses a naval battle anytime they fight Japan so they were supper confident
It is unlikely that j-20 will have an upper hand in the air battle against f-35. There is a big difference in stealth performance, detection performance, and missile performance.
That's exactly how a large scale naval warfare would happen IRL. Awesome bro.
Thanks^^
That’s exactly the opposite. The video is content over realism
Kinda biased but have to respect for creating such video it must have taken a lot of time and effort to built the idea and script it and making it look real. I would like to know how you guys make such video. Good work.
That was mad !! It was really well put together 🫡
I want to point out one mistake. JASDF and RoKAF aircraft would have gotten into the air once air defenses detect and intercepted many missiles. Then there's naval ships with AEGIS and a few American air defenses as well.
To reduce the kinetic energy of a fleet air missile? We could have a little more chance of avoiding it.
Yes overlapping means of defense, plus... JGSDF Type 88 and Type 12 should got engaged as well.
The entire video is a mistake, everything is wrong
The JMSDF also operates SM-3 Block IIA, which are very lethal ship launched BMD missiles, as well as SM-6 very long SAM. The 120 Ballistic Missile is unlikely to get through the Korean and Japanese BMD system. It can't even get through Taiwanese BMD systems
The proof of such is claim is from what real world experience? Two things we know, Ballistic missiles have been tested numerous time in battle. They are fired and arrive at or near their targets. Its a simple fact. The second thing is defense systems which have been designed to stop Ballistic Missiles have failed time and again to intercept ballistic missiles. Real world facts. Gulf war Scuds had no problem getting past patriots, actually not a single intercept. In Saudi Arabia Patriot pac 3 failed to stop Tochkas and Houthi Fajir 5... In Ukraine you can watch as KH47 defeats patriot again. In Iraq the Iranian Fataha BM defeated Patriot as well as short range sam and phalynx to hit american bases. There is no current system that is fielded that has any real world record of successful intercepts of a BM. Let alone a massed attack. Including sm3 and sm6, neither of which have been proven to work in a real world situation/combat. all historical data suggests that the BM would be the clear winner.
This is only for show. In a real war, CCP will lose 2/3 of their naval force before USA comes in.
can you please list how to get the miss for the Japanese and korean ships
Why missiles still do not zig zag during terminal approach ? That ability has been available for decades.
Prob bc the owner didn’t buy the more expensive mod
"You thought it was Haneda, but it was I, Dio! Wryyyyyy!" Proceeds to terrorize Chinese fleet
Awesome work!
You know I realized something recently, the HHQ-9B has a quoted range of about 250km, and is meant to be the cutting edge for China, but the US' SM-2 ER Blk IV from 1999 has a range of 370km... and, the US Arleigh Burke has 96 missile cells while the standard Type 052D only has 64, some of which are reserved for anti ship/land attack missiles...
That KF-21 mod for DCS is cool, where did you get it ??
I asked a 3D designer to make it.
Please make a video about indian navy
Why not show missile😊 function at target
😎 Su 33 next?
Even if Su33 comes out, it won't change much.
@@milsimkcab you do a russian atampt at push8ng the northen fleet through the bering strait
Who is the winner 🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩😀🙏🙏
The winner hasn't been decided yet. This is one of the long series.
Who is the winner
This video is one of the long series.
The story goes on.
😮
日本語カタコトすぎるしこの世界線では出雲はもう空母化されて配備されてるのかな？
Although the concept of a large naval battle such as this is totally within the scopes of naval warfare, betting the Koreans and Japanese to fight the Chinese would be far away from reality. The ROKN and JMSDF are oriented on coastal defense rather than moving into open water. This is why JGSDF and ROKA operates ground-based anti-ship missiles.
Cheaper to use guns?
Compared to missiles, yes.
15:16 K-Yakhont 😊
5:36 The Japanese Maritime Defence Force probably remembered that China always loses a naval battle anytime they fight Japan so they were supper confident
羽田くんすこ
I hope this is real hahaha
No funcionan los subtítulos... canceló mi subscripción
Try using Auto-translate. You can use it by pressing Settings.
❤ B
🇺🇸🇰🇷🇯🇵🆚🇨🇳
J20 just like tofu striking a rock f35
It is unlikely that j-20 will have an upper hand in the air battle against f-35. There is a big difference in stealth performance, detection performance, and missile performance.
@@milsimktaking into account size and engine performance, I would include kinematic performance as an F-35 advantage, also.
Don't play any more simulated battle ..show the real one...
@@brionjohnson2985 SB